Misplaced Pages

Hippocratic Oath: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:54, 25 September 2006 edit212.135.1.185 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:01, 23 November 2024 edit undoSurial57 (talk | contribs)43 edits "First do no harm": Some tidying up of sentence order, and clarification about what is not known about the phrase's origin. 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Oath of ethics taken by physicians}}
{{otheruses}}
{{Other uses}}
The '''Hippocratic Oath''' is an ] traditionally taken by ]s pertaining to the ] practice of medicine. It is widely believed that the oath was written by ], the father of ], in the 4th Century B.C., or by one of his students {{rf|1|Farnell1}}. Classical scholar Ludwig Edelstein proposed that the oath was written by ], a theory that has been questioned due to the lack of evidence for a school of Pythagorean medicine. {{rf|2|Temkin}} Although mostly of historical and traditional value, the oath is considered a rite of passage for practitioners of medicine.They have to also like pies.
{{Distinguish|Hypocrisy}}
] (460–370 BC), to whom the oath is traditionally attributed]]
The '''Hippocratic Oath''' is an ] of ] historically taken by ]s. It is one of the most widely known of Greek medical texts. In its original form, it requires a new physician to swear, by a number of ], to uphold specific ethical standards. The oath is the earliest expression of ] in the Western world, establishing several principles of medical ethics which remain of paramount significance today. These include the principles of ] and ]. As the foundational articulation of certain principles that continue to guide and inform medical practice, the ancient text is of more than historic and symbolic value. It is enshrined in the legal statutes of various jurisdictions, such that violations of the oath may carry criminal or other liability beyond the oath's symbolic nature.


The original oath was written in ], between the fifth and third centuries BC.<ref>{{cite book |last=Edelstein |first=Ludwig |author-link=Ludwig Edelstein |title=The Hippocratic Oath: Text, Translation and Interpretation |page=56 |isbn=978-0-8018-0184-6 |date=1943|publisher=Johns Hopkins Press }}</ref> Although it is traditionally attributed to the Greek doctor ] and it is usually included in the ], some modern scholars do not regard it as having been written by Hippocrates himself.
==The Hippocratic Oath==
Original, translated from Greek.


==Text of the oath==
{{cquote|I swear by ], ], and ], and I take to witness all the gods, all the goddesses, to keep according to my ability and my judgement, the following Oath.
===Earliest surviving copy===
] 2547.]]
The oldest partial fragments of the oath date to circa AD 275. The oldest extant version dates to roughly the 10th–11th century, held in the ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://digi.vatlib.it/view/MSS_Urb.gr.64|title=Codices urbinates graeci Bibliothecae Vaticanae: Folio 64(Urb.gr.64) |page=folio:116 microfilm: 121|publisher=Vatican Library: DigiVatLib|year=900–1100}}</ref> A commonly cited version, dated to 1595, appears in ] with a Latin translation.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nlm.nih.gov/hmd/greek/greek_oath.html|publisher=National Institute of Health; National Library of Medicine; History of Medicine Division|title=Greek Medicine: "I Swear by Apollo Physician...": Green Medicine from the Gods to Galen|year=2002|first1=Michael|last1=North}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nlm.nih.gov/hmd/greek/popup/16_hippo_oath.html|title=Hippocrates. Τα ενρισκομενα Opera omnia|first1=Andreae |last1=Wecheli|year=1595|location=Frankfurt|publisher= National Institute of Health; National Library of Medicine; History of Medicine Division).}}</ref> In this translation, the author translates {{lang|grc|]}} to the Latin {{lang|la|]}}.


Below is the Hippocratic Oath, in Greek, from the 1923 Loeb edition, followed by the English translation:
To consider dear to me as my parents him who taught me ]; to live in common with him and if necessary to share my goods with him; To look upon his children as my own brothers, to teach them this art if they so desire without fee or written promise; to impart to my sons and the sons of the master who taught me and the disciples who have enrolled themselves and have agreed to the rules of the profession, but to these alone the precepts and the instruction.


{{Verse translation|lang=grc|italicsoff=y|ὄμνυμι Ἀπόλλωνα ἰητρὸν καὶ Ἀσκληπιὸν καὶ Ὑγείαν καὶ Πανάκειαν καὶ θεοὺς πάντας τε καὶ πάσας, ἵστορας ποιεύμενος, ἐπιτελέα ποιήσειν κατὰ δύναμιν καὶ κρίσιν ἐμὴν ὅρκον τόνδε καὶ συγγραφὴν τήνδε:
I will ] regimens for the good of my patients according to my ability and my judgment and never do harm to anyone.


ἡγήσεσθαι μὲν τὸν διδάξαντά με τὴν τέχνην ταύτην ἴσα γενέτῃσιν ἐμοῖς, καὶ βίου κοινώσεσθαι, καὶ χρεῶν χρηΐζοντι μετάδοσιν ποιήσεσθαι, καὶ γένος τὸ ἐξ αὐτοῦ ἀδελφοῖς ἴσον ἐπικρινεῖν ἄρρεσι, καὶ διδάξειν τὴν τέχνην ταύτην, ἢν χρηΐζωσι μανθάνειν, ἄνευ μισθοῦ καὶ συγγραφῆς, παραγγελίης τε καὶ ἀκροήσιος καὶ τῆς λοίπης ἁπάσης μαθήσιος μετάδοσιν ποιήσεσθαι υἱοῖς τε ἐμοῖς καὶ τοῖς τοῦ ἐμὲ διδάξαντος, καὶ μαθητῇσι συγγεγραμμένοις τε καὶ ὡρκισμένοις νόμῳ ἰητρικῷ, ἄλλῳ δὲ οὐδενί.
To please no one will I prescribe a deadly drug nor give advice which may cause his death.


διαιτήμασί τε χρήσομαι ἐπ᾽ ὠφελείῃ καμνόντων κατὰ δύναμιν καὶ κρίσιν ἐμήν, ἐπὶ δηλήσει δὲ καὶ ἀδικίῃ εἴρξειν.
Nor will I give a woman a ] to procure ].


οὐ δώσω δὲ οὐδὲ φάρμακον οὐδενὶ αἰτηθεὶς θανάσιμον, οὐδὲ ὑφηγήσομαι συμβουλίην τοιήνδε: ὁμοίως δὲ οὐδὲ γυναικὶ πεσσὸν φθόριον δώσω.
But I will preserve the purity of my life and my art.


ἁγνῶς δὲ καὶ ὁσίως διατηρήσω βίον τὸν ἐμὸν καὶ τέχνην τὴν ἐμήν.
I will not cut for ], even for patients in whom the disease is manifest; I will leave this operation to be performed by practitioners, specialists in ].


οὐ τεμέω δὲ οὐδὲ μὴν λιθιῶντας, ἐκχωρήσω δὲ ἐργάτῃσιν ἀνδράσι πρήξιος τῆσδε.
In every house where I come I will enter only for the good of my patients, keeping myself far from all intentional ill-doing and all seduction and especially from the pleasures of love with women or with men, be they free or slaves.


ἐς οἰκίας δὲ ὁκόσας ἂν ἐσίω, ἐσελεύσομαι ἐπ᾽ ὠφελείῃ καμνόντων, ἐκτὸς ἐὼν πάσης ἀδικίης ἑκουσίης καὶ φθορίης, τῆς τε ἄλλης καὶ ἀφροδισίων ἔργων ἐπί τε γυναικείων σωμάτων καὶ ἀνδρῴων, ἐλευθέρων τε καὶ δούλων.
All that may come to my knowledge in the exercise of my profession or in daily commerce with men, which ought not to be spread abroad, I will keep secret and will never reveal.


ἃ δ᾽ ἂν ἐνθεραπείῃ ἴδω ἢ ἀκούσω, ἢ καὶ ἄνευ θεραπείης κατὰ βίον ἀνθρώπων, ἃ μὴ χρή ποτε ἐκλαλεῖσθαι ἔξω, σιγήσομαι, ἄρρητα ἡγεύμενος εἶναι τὰ τοιαῦτα.
If I keep this oath faithfully, may I enjoy my life and practice my art, respected by all men and in all times; but if I swerve from it or violate it, may the reverse be my lot.}}


ὅρκον μὲν οὖν μοι τόνδε ἐπιτελέα ποιέοντι, καὶ μὴ συγχέοντι, εἴη ἐπαύρασθαι καὶ βίου καὶ τέχνης δοξαζομένῳ παρὰ πᾶσιν ἀνθρώποις ἐς τὸν αἰεὶ χρόνον: παραβαίνοντι δὲ καὶ ἐπιορκέοντι, τἀναντία τούτων.<ref name=Loeb_Greek>{{cite journal|last1=Hippocrates of Cos|title=The Oath|journal=Loeb Classical Library|date=1923|volume=147|pages=298–299|doi=10.4159/DLCL.hippocrates_cos-oath.1923|url=http://www.loebclassics.com/view/hippocrates_cos-oath/1923/pb_LCL147.299.xml|access-date=6 October 2015}}</ref>|I swear by ] Healer, by ], by ], by ], and by all the gods and goddesses, making them my witnesses, that I will carry out, according to my ability and judgment, this oath and this indenture.
==Modern relevance==
Several parts of the oath have been removed or re-shaped over the years in various ], ]s, and societies as the social, religious, and political importance of ] has changed. Most schools administer some form of oath, but the great majority no longer use the ancient version, which praised non-Abrahamic deities, advocated teaching of men but not women, and forbade general practitioners from surgery, ], ], or abuse of the prescription pad. Also missing from the ancient Oath and from many modern versions are the complex ethical issues associated with ]s, ]s, and whether ]s are technically closer to ] or an abortion.


To hold my teacher in this art equal to my own parents; to make him partner in my livelihood; when he is in need of money to share mine with him; to consider his family as my own brothers, and to teach them this art, if they want to learn it, without fee or indenture; to impart precept, oral instruction, and all other instruction to my own sons, the sons of my teacher, and to indentured pupils who have taken the Healer's oath, but to nobody else.
Changed portions of the oath:
# ''To teach medicine to the sons of my teacher.'' In the past, medical schools would give preferential consideration to the children of physicians. This too has largely disappeared.<br>&nbsp;
# ''Not to teach medicine to other people.'' If taken seriously, a physician who attempts to educate or make aware of treatment options, even online, to anyone not enrolled in medical school would lose his or her license.<br/>&nbsp;
# ''To practice and prescribe to the best of my ability for the good of my patients, and to try to avoid harming them.'' This beneficial intention is the purpose of the physician. However, this item is still invoked in discussions of ]. <br/>&nbsp;
# ''Never to do deliberate harm to anyone for anyone else's interest.'' Physician organizations in the U.S. and most other countries have strongly denounced physician participation in ]s.<br/>&nbsp;
# ''Never to attempt to induce an ].'' The wide availability of abortions in much of the world suggests that many physicians no longer feel bound by this.<br/>&nbsp;
# ''To avoid violating the morals of my community.'' Many licensing agencies will revoke a physician's license for offending the morals of the community ("moral turpitude").<br/>&nbsp;
# ''To avoid attempting to do things that other specialists can do better.'' The "stones" referred to are ]s or ]s, removal of which was judged too difficult for physicians, and therefore was left for surgeons (specialists). It is interesting how early the value of specialization was recognized. The range of knowledge and skills needed for the range of human problems has always made it impossible for any single physician to maintain expertise in all areas. This also highlights the different historical origins of the ] and the physician.<br/>&nbsp;
# ''To keep the good of the patient as the highest priority.'' There may be other conflicting "good purposes," such as community welfare, conserving economic resources, supporting the criminal justice system, or simply making money for the physician or his employer that provide recurring challenges to physicians.<br>&nbsp;
# ''To avoid sexual relationships or other inappropriate entanglements with patients and families.'' The value of avoiding conflicts of interest has never been questioned.<br>&nbsp;
# ''To keep confidential all private patient information.'' ] between ] continues to be valued and protected, but governments and third-parties have occasionally encroached upon it.


I will use those dietary regimens which will benefit my patients according to my greatest ability and judgment, and I will do no harm or injustice to them.<ref>{{cite web |title=Greek Medicine – The Hippocratic Oath |url=https://www.nlm.nih.gov/hmd/greek/greek_oath.html |website=www.nlm.nih.gov |publisher=National Library of Medicine – NIH |access-date=29 July 2020}}</ref> Neither will I administer a poison to anybody when asked to do so, nor will I suggest such a course. Similarly I will not give to a woman a ] to cause abortion. But I will keep pure and holy both my life and my art. I will not use the knife, not even, verily, on sufferers from ], but I will give place to such as are craftsmen therein.
==Modern versions and alternatives==
A widely used modern version of the traditional oath was penned by Louis Lasagna, former Dean of Tufts Medical School.


Into whatsoever houses I enter, I will enter to help the sick, and I will abstain from all intentional wrong-doing and harm, especially from abusing the bodies of man or woman, bond or free. And whatsoever I shall see or hear in the course of my profession, as well as outside my profession in my intercourse with men, if it be what should not be published abroad, I will never divulge, holding such things to be holy secrets.
In the 1970s cultural and social forces induced many American medical schools to abandon the Hippocratic Oath as part of graduation ceremonies, usually substituting a version modified to something considered more politically up to date, or an alternate pledge like the Oath or Prayer of ].


Now if I carry out this oath, and break it not, may I gain for ever reputation among all men for my life and for my art; but if I break it and forswear myself, may the opposite befall me.<ref name="Loeb_Greek" />|attr2=Translation by W.H.S. Jones}}
The Hippocratic Oath has been updated by the ]. In the ], the ] provides clear modern guidance in the form of its and statements.


==Primum non nocere== ==="First do no harm"===
{{Main|Primum non nocere}}
It is often said that "First do no harm" ({{Langx|la|Primum non nocere}}) is a part of the original Hippocratic oath. A related phrase is found in Epidemics, Book I, of the Hippocratic school: "Practice two things in your dealings with disease: either help or do not harm the patient".<ref>{{cite book|editor1-last=Lloyd|editor1-first=Geoffrey|title=Hippocratic Writings|date=1983|publisher=Penguin Books|location=London|isbn=978-0-14-044451-3|pages=|edition=2nd|url=https://archive.org/details/hippocraticwriti0000hipp/page/94}}</ref> Although no such phrase from which "First" or "Primum" can be translated appears in any well recognized version of the oath, a similar intention is vowed by, "I will abstain from all intentional wrong-doing and harm". "''Primum non nocere''" was claimed by the 19th-century English surgeon ] to date from the 17th-century English physician ],<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Sokol|first1=Daniel K.|author-link1=Daniel Sokol|title='First do no harm' revisited|journal=BMJ|date=2013|volume=347|pages=f6426|url=http://www.bmj.com/content/347/bmj.f6426|access-date=20 September 2014|doi=10.1136/bmj.f6426|pmid=24163087|s2cid=33952216}}</ref> but Sydenham's available writings contain no such phrase or equivalent,<ref>{{cite journal |last=Smith |first=C. M. |year=2005 |title=Origin and Uses of ''Primum Non Nocere'' – Above All, Do No Harm! |journal=] |volume=45 |issue=4 |pages=371–77 |doi=10.1177/0091270004273680|pmid=15778417 |s2cid=41058798 }}</ref> and it more likely took shape from longstanding popular nonmedical expression.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Suss |first=Richard A. |date=November 21, 2024 |title=''First Do No Harm'' Is Proverbial, Not Hippocratic |journal=OSF Preprints |language=en |doi=10.31219/osf.io/c23jq}}</ref>


==Context and interpretation==
It is a common misconception that the phrase ], “first, do no harm” is included in the Hippocratic Oath. It is not, but seems to have been derived through ] from ]’s ''Epidemics'' in which he wrote, “Declare the past, diagnose the present, foretell the future; practice these acts. As to diseases, make a habit of two things—to help, or at least to do no harm.”
] manuscript of the oath]]
The oath is arguably the best known text of the ], although most modern scholars do not attribute it to Hippocrates himself, estimating it to have been written in the fourth or fifth century BC.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Jouanna|first1=Jacques|title=Hippocrates|date=2001|publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press|location=Baltimore, Md.|isbn=978-0-8018-6818-4|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/hippocrates0000joua}}</ref> Alternatively, classical scholar ] proposed that the oath was written by the ], an idea that others questioned for lack of evidence for a school of Pythagorean medicine.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Temkin|first1=Owsei|title="On second thought" and other essays in the history of medicine and science|date=2002|publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press|location=Baltimore, MD|isbn=978-0-8018-6774-3|url=https://archive.org/details/onsecondthoughto0000temk}}</ref> While Pythagorean philosophy displays a correlation to the Oath's values, the proposal of a direct relationship has been mostly discredited in more recent studies.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Askitopoulou|first1=Helen|last2=Vgontzas|first2=Antoniοs N.|date=2018-07-01|title=The relevance of the Hippocratic Oath to the ethical and moral values of contemporary medicine. Part I: The Hippocratic Oath from antiquity to modern times|url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5348-4|journal=European Spine Journal|language=en|volume=27|issue=7|pages=1481–1490|doi=10.1007/s00586-017-5348-4|pmid=29080001|s2cid=10142596|issn=1432-0932}}</ref>

Its general ethical principles are also found in other works of the Corpus: the Physician mentions the obligation to keep the "holy things" of medicine within the medical community (i.e. not to divulge secrets); it also mentions the special position of the doctor with regard to his patients, especially women and girls.<ref>{{cite book|editor-last=Potter|editor-first=Paul|title=Hippocrates|date=1995|publisher=Harvard Univ. Press u.a.|location=Cambridge, Massachusetts|isbn=978-0-674-99531-4|pages=|edition=Reprint|url=https://archive.org/details/hippocrates01hipp_0/page/295}}</ref> However, several aspects of the oath contradict patterns of practice established elsewhere in the Corpus. Most notable is its ban on the use of the knife, even for small procedures such as ], even though other works in the Corpus provide guidance on performing surgical procedures.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Nutton|first1=Vivian|title=Ancient medicine|date=2012|publisher=Routledge|location=Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon|isbn=978-0-415-52095-9|page=68|edition=2nd}}</ref>

Providing poisonous drugs would certainly have been viewed as immoral by contemporary physicians if it resulted in murder. However, the absolute ban described in the oath also forbids ]. Several accounts of ancient physicians willingly ] have survived.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Edelstein|first1=Ludwig|title=Ancient Medicine: Selected Papers of Ludwig Edelstein|date=1967|publisher=Johns Hopkins Press|location=Baltimore, Md.|isbn=978-0-8018-0183-9|pages=9–15}}</ref> Multiple explanations for the prohibition of euthanasia in the oath have been proposed: it is possible that not all physicians swore the oath, or that the oath was seeking to prevent widely held concerns that physicians could be employed as political assassins.<ref name="swear by">{{cite journal|last1=Markel|first1=Howard|title="I Swear by Apollo" – On Taking the Hippocratic Oath|url=http://www.praxis-hegibach.ch/downloads-10/downloads-13/files/the%20hippocratic%20oath.pdf|journal=The New England Journal of Medicine|year=2004|volume=350|issue=20|pages=2026–2029|publisher=Massachusetts Medical Society|doi=10.1056/NEJMp048092|pmid=15141039|access-date=1 March 2017}}</ref>

The interpreted AD 275 fragment of the oath contains a prohibition of abortion that is in contradiction to original Hippocratic text ''On the Nature of the Child'', which contains a description of an abortion, without any implication that it was morally wrong,<ref>{{cite book|last1=Lonie|first1=Iain M.|title=The Hippocratic treatises, "On generation," "On the nature of the child," "Diseases IV" a commentary|date=1981|publisher=De Gruyter|location=Berlin|isbn=978-3-11-086396-3|page=7}}</ref> and descriptions of abortifacient medications are numerous in the ancient medical literature.<ref>{{cite book|last1=King|first1=Helen|title=Hippocrates' woman: reading the female body in ancient Greece|date=1998|publisher=Routledge|location=London|isbn=978-0-415-13895-6|pages=132–156}}</ref> The oath's stance on abortion was unclear even in the ancient world where physicians debated whether the specification of pessaries was a ban on simply ], or a blanket ban on all abortion methods.<ref name=":0">{{Cite thesis |title=The "Hippocratic" Stance on Abortion: The Translation, Interpretation, and Use of the Hippocratic Oath in the Abortion Debate from the Ancient World to Present-Day |url=https://qspace.library.queensu.ca/handle/1974/24465 |date=2018 |degree=Master of Arts |language=en |first=Olivia |last=De Brabandere |publisher=Queen's University |pages=3–4, 7, 58}}</ref> ] was adamant in AD 43 (the earliest surviving reference to the oath) that it precluded abortion.<ref name=Largus/> In the 1st or 2nd century AD work ''Gynaecology'', ] wrote that one party of medical practitioners followed the Oath and banished all abortifacients, while the other party—to which he belonged—was willing to prescribe abortions, but only for the sake of the mother's health.<ref name=Largus></ref><ref name=Soranus>{{cite book|last1=Soranus, Owsei Temkin|title=Soranus' Gynecology|date=1956|publisher=JHU Press|location=I.19.60|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YsKWfh31gxwC&q=soranus%20gynecology%20digital&pg=PR1|access-date=6 October 2015|isbn=978-0-8018-4320-4}}</ref> ] states that "abortion{{nbsp}} though doctors are forbidden to cause it, was possibly not condemned in all cases". He believed that the oath prohibited abortions, though not under all circumstances.<ref name=":0" /> ] argues that because Hippocrates specified pessaries, he only meant pessaries and therefore it was acceptable for a Hippocratic doctor to perform abortions using oral drugs, violent means, a disruption of daily routine or eating habits, and more. Other scholars, most notably ], believe that the author intended to prohibit any and all abortions.<ref name=":0" /> Olivia De Brabandere writes that regardless of the author's original intention, the vague and polyvalent nature of the relevant line has allowed both professionals and non-professionals to interpret and use the oath in several ways.<ref name=":0" /> While many Christian versions of the Hippocratic Oath, particularly from the Middle Ages, explicitly prohibited abortion, the prohibition is often omitted from many oaths taken in US medical schools today, though it remains controversial.<ref name="swear by"/>

The oath stands out among comparable ancient texts on medical ethics and professionalism through its heavily religious tone, a factor which makes attributing its authorship to Hippocrates particularly difficult. Phrases such as "but I will keep pure and holy both my life and my art" suggest a deep, almost monastic devotion to the art of medicine. He who keeps to the oath is promised "reputation among all men for my life and for my art". This contrasts heavily with Galenic writings on professional ethics, which employ a far more pragmatic approach, where good practice is defined as effective practice, without reference to deities.<ref>{{cite book|editor1-last=Wear|editor1-first=Andrew|editor2-last=Geyer-Kordesch|editor2-first=Johanna|editor3-last=French|editor3-first=Roger Kenneth|title=Doctors and Ethics: The Earlier Historical Setting of Professional Ethics|date=1993|publisher=Rodopi|location=Amsterdam|pages=10–37}}</ref>

The oath's importance among the medical community is nonetheless attested by its appearance on the tombstones of physicians, and by the fourth century AD it had come to stand for the medical profession.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=von Staden|first1=H|title=In a pure and holy way. Personal and professional conduct in the Hippocratic Oath|journal=Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences|volume=51|date=1996|issue=4|pages=404–437|doi=10.1093/jhmas/51.4.404|pmid=9019063}}</ref>

The oath continued to be in use in the Byzantine Christian world with its references to pagan deities replaced by a Christian preamble, as in the 12th-century manuscript pictured in the shape of a cross.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Nutton|first1=Vivian|title=Ancient medicine|date=2012|publisher=Routledge|location=Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon|isbn=978-0-415-52095-9|page=415, note 87|edition=2nd}}</ref>

==Modern versions and relevance==
], 1638]]
The Hippocratic Oath has been eclipsed as a document of professional ethics by more extensive, regularly updated ethical codes issued by national medical associations, such as the American Medical Association's ''Code of Medical Ethics'' (first adopted in 1847), and the British ] ''Good Medical Practice''. These documents provide a comprehensive overview of the obligations and professional behaviour of a doctor to their patients and wider society. Doctors who violate these codes may be subjected to disciplinary proceedings, including the loss of their license to practice medicine. Nonetheless, the length of these documents has made their distillations into shorter oaths an attractive proposition. In light of this fact, several updates to the oath have been offered in modern times,<ref>Buchholz B, et al. Prohibición de la litotomía y derivación a expertos en los juramentos médicos de la genealogía hipocrática. Actas Urologicas Espanolas. Volume 40, Issue 10, December 2016, Pages 640–645.</ref><ref>{{cite journal|pmc=2540578|year=1994|last1=Oswald|first1=H.|title=Outcome of childhood asthma in mid-adult life|journal=BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|volume=309|issue=6947|pages=95–96|last2=Phelan|first2=P. D.|last3=Lanigan|first3=A.|last4=Hibbert|first4=M.|last5=Bowes|first5=G.|last6=Olinsky|first6=A.|pmid=8038676|doi=10.1136/bmj.309.6947.95}}</ref> some facetious.<ref>{{Cite journal |doi=10.1056/NEJM198601023140122|pmid=3940324|title=The Hippocratic Oath — Corporate Version|journal=New England Journal of Medicine|volume=314|issue=1|pages=62|year=1986|last1=Schiedermayer|first1=D. L.}}</ref>

The oath has been modified numerous times.

One of the most significant revisions was first drafted in 1948 by the ] (WMA), called the ]. "During the post World War II and immediately after its foundation, the WMA showed concern over the state of medical ethics in general and over the world. The WMA took up the responsibility for setting ethical guidelines for the world's physicians. It noted that in those years the custom of medical schools to administer an oath to its doctors upon graduation or receiving a license to practice medicine had fallen into disuse or become a mere formality".<ref>{{cite web|last1=World Medical Association, Inc.|title=WMA History|url=http://www.wma.net/en/60about/70history/index.html|website=www.wma.net|publisher=World Medical Association, Inc.|access-date=1 November 2014|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150206154153/http://www.wma.net/en/60about/70history/index.html|archive-date=6 February 2015}}</ref> In ], medical students did not take the Hippocratic Oath, although they knew the ethic of "nil nocere"—do no harm.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Baumslag|first1=Naomi|title=Murderous Medicine: Nazi Doctors, Human Experimentation, and Typhus|url=https://archive.org/details/murderousmedicin0000baum/page/|url-access=registration|date=2005|publisher=Praeger Publishers|isbn=978-0-275-98312-3|pages=}}</ref>{{fv|date=September 2021}}

In the 1960s, the Hippocratic Oath was changed to require "utmost respect for human life from its beginning", making it a more secular obligation, not to be taken in the presence of any gods, but before only other people. When the oath was rewritten in 1964 by ], Academic Dean of the School of Medicine at Tufts University, the prayer was omitted, and that version has been widely accepted and is still in use today by many US medical schools:<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/body/hippocratic-oath-today.html|title=The Hippocratic Oath Today|website=] |date=27 March 2001 }}</ref>

<blockquote> I swear to fulfill, to the best of my ability and judgment, this covenant:

I will respect the hard-won scientific gains of those physicians in whose steps I walk, and gladly share such knowledge as is mine with those who are to follow.

I will apply, for the benefit of the sick, all measures are required, avoiding those twin traps of overtreatment and ].

I will remember that there is art to medicine as well as science, and that warmth, sympathy, and understanding may outweigh the surgeon's knife or the chemist's drug.

I will not be ashamed to say "I know not", nor will I fail to call in my colleagues when the skills of another are needed for a patient's recovery.

I will respect the privacy of my patients, for their problems are not disclosed to me that the world may know. Most especially must I tread with care in matters of life and death. If it is given me to save a life, all thanks. But it may also be within my power to take a life; this awesome responsibility must be faced with great humbleness and awareness of my own frailty. Above all, I must not play at God.

I will remember that I do not treat a fever chart, a cancerous growth, but a sick human being, whose illness may affect the person's family and economic stability. My responsibility includes these related problems, if I am to care adequately for the sick.

I will prevent disease whenever I can, for prevention is preferable to cure.
I will remember that I remain a member of society, with special obligations to all my fellow human beings, those sound of mind and body as well as the infirm.

If I do not violate this oath, may I enjoy life and art, respected while I live and remembered with affection thereafter. May I always act so as to preserve the finest traditions of my calling and may I long experience the joy of healing those who seek my help.</blockquote>

In a 1989 survey of 126 US medical schools, only three of them reported use of the original oath, while thirty-three used the Declaration of Geneva, sixty-seven used a modified Hippocratic Oath, four used the ], one used a covenant, eight used another oath, one used an unknown oath, and two did not use any kind of oath. Seven medical schools did not reply to the survey.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Crawshaw|first1=R|title=The Hippocratic oath. Is alive and well in North America|journal=BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|date=8 October 1994|volume=309|issue=6959|pages=952–953|pmid=7950672|pmc=2541124|doi=10.1136/bmj.309.6959.952}}</ref>

As of 1993, only 14% of medical oaths prohibited euthanasia, and only 8% prohibited abortion.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Markel|first1=Howard|title="I Swear by Apollo" — On Taking the Hippocratic Oath|url=http://www.praxis-hegibach.ch/downloads-10/downloads-13/files/the%20hippocratic%20oath.pdf|journal=The New England Journal of Medicine|year=2004|volume=350|issue=20|pages=2026–9|publisher=Massachusetts Medical Society|doi=10.1056/NEJMp048092|pmid=15141039|access-date=1 March 2017}}</ref>

In a 2000 survey of US medical schools, all of the then extant medical schools administered some type of professional oath. Among schools of modern medicine, sixty-two of 122 used the Hippocratic Oath, or a modified version of it. The other sixty schools used the original or modified Declaration of Geneva, Oath of Maimonides, or an oath authored by students or faculty or both. All nineteen osteopathic schools in the United States used the ],<ref name="content analysis">{{cite journal|last1=Kao|first1=AC|last2=Parsi|first2=KP|title=Content analyses of oaths administered at U.S. medical schools in 2000.|journal=Academic Medicine|date=September 2004|volume=79|issue=9|pages=882–7|pmid=15326016|doi=10.1097/00001888-200409000-00015|doi-access=free}}</ref> which is taken in place of or in addition to the Hippocratic Oath. The Osteopathic Oath was first used in 1938, and the current version has been in use since 1954.<ref name="osteopathic oath">{{cite news |title=Osteopathic Oath |url=http://www.osteopathic.org/inside-aoa/about/leadership/Pages/osteopathic-oath.aspx |access-date=28 November 2014 |newspaper=American Osteopathic Association}}</ref>

In France, it is common for new medical graduates to sign a written oath.<ref name="Medical oaths and declarations">{{cite journal|last=Sritharan|first=Kaji|author2=Georgina Russell |author3=Zoe Fritz |author4=Davina Wong |author5=Matthew Rollin |author6=Jake Dunning |author7=Bruce Wayne |author8=Philip Morgan |author9=Catherine Sheehan |title=Medical oaths and declarations|journal=BMJ|date=December 2000|volume=323|issue=7327|pages=1440–1|pmid=11751345|pmc=1121898|doi=10.1136/bmj.323.7327.1440}}</ref><ref name="Letters, BMJ 8/8/1994">{{cite journal|last1=Crawshaw|first1=R|last2=Pennington|first2=T H|last3=Pennington|first3=C I|last4=Reiss|first4=H|last5=Loudon|first5=I|title=Letters|journal=BMJ|date=October 1994|volume=309|pages=952–953|pmc=2541124|pmid=7950672|issue=6959|doi=10.1136/bmj.309.6959.952}}</ref>

In 1995, ], in his acceptance speech for the ], suggested a ].<ref>{{cite news | title = Nobel Prize winner calls for ethics oath| url = https://physicsworld.com/a/nobel-prize-winner-calls-for-ethics-oath/ | publisher = Physics World |date=19 December 1997 | access-date = 2008-07-19}}</ref>

In November 2005, ], then leader of ], declared that doctors should swear an oath to him instead of the Hippocratic Oath.<ref name="Turkmen Doctors">{{cite web | title=Turkmen Doctors Pledge Allegiance To Niyazov | website=RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty | date=15 November 2005 | url=https://www.rferl.org/a/1062955.html | access-date=24 August 2024}}</ref>

In 2007, US citizen ] was convicted for making a pledge to ], thus agreeing to provide medical aid to wounded terrorists.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://trial-and-terror.theintercept.com/people/7fcd767d-4a52-4f82-a10d-50d1ceb86ae9|title=Trial and Terror|access-date=2021-05-07|archive-date=2021-05-07|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210507125220/https://trial-and-terror.theintercept.com/people/7fcd767d-4a52-4f82-a10d-50d1ceb86ae9|url-status=dead}}</ref>

As of 2018, all US medical school graduates made some form of public oath but none used the original Hippocratic Oath. A modified form or an oath unique to that school is often used. A review of 18 of these oaths was criticized for their wide variability: "Consistency would help society see that physicians are members of a profession that's committed to a shared set of essential ethical values."<ref>{{cite web |last1=Weiner |first1=Stacey |title=The solemn truth about medical oaths |url=https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/solemn-truth-about-medical-oaths |website=aamc.org |publisher=American Association of Medical Colleges |access-date=17 June 2022 |date=10 July 2018}}</ref>

==Violations==
There is no direct punishment for breaking the Hippocratic Oath, although an arguable equivalent in modern times is ], which carries a wide range of punishments, from imprisonment to civil penalties.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Groner M.D.|first=Johnathan|title=The Hippocratic Paradox: The Role of The Medical Profession In Capital Punishment In The United States|journal=Fordham Urban Law |year=2008}}</ref> Medical professionals may also be subject to other parts of the criminal and civil law for conduct contrary to both an oath taken and to a more general prohibition on, for example, doing physical or other harm to other persons. In the United States, several major judicial decisions have made reference to the classical Hippocratic Oath, either upholding or dismissing its bounds for medical ethics: '']'', '']'', ''Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington'' (1996), and ''Thorburn v. Department of Corrections'' (1998).<ref name=Hasday_Yale>{{cite journal|last1=Hasday|first1=Lisa|title=The Hippocratic Oath as Literary Text: A Dialogue|journal=Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics|date=23 February 2013|volume=2|issue=2|page=Article 4|url=http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1045&context=yjhple|access-date=6 October 2015}}</ref> In antiquity, the punishment for breaking the Hippocratic oath could range from a penalty to losing the right to practice medicine.<ref>{{cite book|last=Nutton|first=Vivian|title=Ancient Medicine|year=2004|publisher=Routledge|location=New York, NY}}</ref>

In 2022, at a college in the ]n state of ], medical students took the ], a ] oath attributed to ancient sage and physician '']'' instead of the Hippocratic oath. The state government subsequently dismissed the Dean of the Madurai medical college for this act.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-05-01 |title=Madurai college dean removed after MBBS students take 'Charak Shapath' |url=https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/madurai-college-dean-removed-after-mbbs-students-take-charak-shapath-163459 |access-date=2022-05-02 |website=The News Minute |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-05-01 |title=Sanskrit replaces Hippocratic Oath; Tamil Nadu shunts out Madurai Medical College dean |url=https://www.deccanherald.com/national/south/sanskrit-replaces-hippocratic-oath-tamil-nadu-shunts-out-madurai-medical-college-dean-1105521.html |access-date=2022-05-02 |website=Deccan Herald |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=TN medical college dean removed after row over Charak Shapath |url=https://news.google.com/articles/CAIiEGRg_qknf35kzDh_5zdI-IYqGQgEKhAIACoHCAowzrL9CjDC7vQCMJmD1wU |access-date=2022-05-02 |website=Google News |language=en}}</ref> However, he was reinstated by the Tamil Nadu government and assumed office 4 days later.<ref>https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil-nadu/2022/May/06/charak-shapath-row-a-rathinavel-returns-as-dean-of-madurai-medical-college-2450259.html</ref>


==See also== ==See also==
{{columns-list|colwidth=30em|
* ]
* ] * ] Pledge
* ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* '']''
* {{section link|Sushruta#Followers}}
* ]
* ]
}}

; Ethical codes of conduct for physicians
{{columns-list|colwidth=30em|
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ]
}}


; Ethical principles for human experimentation
==Footnotes==
{{columns-list|colwidth=30em|
* {{ent|1|Farnell1}} cf. L.R. Farnell, ''Greek Hero Cults and Ideas of Immortality'', Chapter 10, "The Cult of Asklepios" (pp.234-279), p.269: "The famous Hippocratean oath may not be an authentic deliverance of the great master, but is an ancient formula current in his school."
* ]
* {{ent|2|Temkin}}, "On Second Thought," in ''"On Second Thought" and Other Essays in the History of Medicine'', Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002.
* ]
* ]
}}

; Ethical practices for engineers
{{columns-list|colwidth=30em|
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}
; Science

{{columns-list|colwidth=30em|
* ]
}}


==References== ==References==
{{reflist|30em}}
* - a BBC article about the oath

* - a PBS NOVA Online discussion with responses from doctors as well as 2 versions of the oath
==Further reading==
* Lewis Richard Farnell, ''Greek Hero Cults and Ideas of Immortality'', 1921.
*{{cite journal|last=Hulkower|first=Raphael|title=The History of the Hippocratic Oath: Outdated, Inauthentic, and Yet Still Relevant|journal=The Einstein Journal of Biology and Medicine|year=2010|volume=25/26|pages=41–44}}
* &ndash; a PBS NOVA online discussion with responses from doctors as well as 2 versions of the oath.
*{{cite book |last= Kass |first= Leon |date= 2008 |title= Toward a More Natural Science |publisher= Simon & Schuster |isbn= 978-0-02-917071-7 |url= https://archive.org/details/towardmorenatura00kass }}
*Lewis Richard Farnell, ''Greek Hero Cults and Ideas of Immortality'', 1921.
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210225045509/http://ethics.iit.edu/perspective/v19n1%20perspective.pdf |date=2021-02-25 }}, ethics.iit.edu


==External links== ==External links==
{{Wikiquote}}
* - Image of a 1595 copy of the Hippocratic oath with side-by-side original Greek and Latin translation
* - ] page about the Hippocratic oath. *, ] (]).
* &ndash; Classical version, pbs.org
*
* * &ndash; Modern version, pbs.org
* &ndash; Image of a 1595 copy of the Hippocratic oath with side-by-side original Greek and Latin translation, bium.univ-paris5.fr
*
* &ndash; ] page about the Hippocratic oath, nlm.nih.gov
*
*, zpu-journal.ru
*
* (from Britain's ])
*
{{Portal bar|Medicine}}


] ]
]
]
]
] ]
]
]


]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 23:01, 23 November 2024

Oath of ethics taken by physicians For other uses, see Hippocratic Oath (disambiguation). Not to be confused with Hypocrisy.
The Greek physician Hippocrates (460–370 BC), to whom the oath is traditionally attributed

The Hippocratic Oath is an oath of ethics historically taken by physicians. It is one of the most widely known of Greek medical texts. In its original form, it requires a new physician to swear, by a number of healing gods, to uphold specific ethical standards. The oath is the earliest expression of medical ethics in the Western world, establishing several principles of medical ethics which remain of paramount significance today. These include the principles of medical confidentiality and non-maleficence. As the foundational articulation of certain principles that continue to guide and inform medical practice, the ancient text is of more than historic and symbolic value. It is enshrined in the legal statutes of various jurisdictions, such that violations of the oath may carry criminal or other liability beyond the oath's symbolic nature.

The original oath was written in Ionic Greek, between the fifth and third centuries BC. Although it is traditionally attributed to the Greek doctor Hippocrates and it is usually included in the Hippocratic Corpus, some modern scholars do not regard it as having been written by Hippocrates himself.

Text of the oath

Earliest surviving copy

A fragment of the oath on the 3rd-century Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 2547.

The oldest partial fragments of the oath date to circa AD 275. The oldest extant version dates to roughly the 10th–11th century, held in the Vatican Library. A commonly cited version, dated to 1595, appears in Koine Greek with a Latin translation. In this translation, the author translates πεσσὸν to the Latin fœtum.

Below is the Hippocratic Oath, in Greek, from the 1923 Loeb edition, followed by the English translation:

ὄμνυμι Ἀπόλλωνα ἰητρὸν καὶ Ἀσκληπιὸν καὶ Ὑγείαν καὶ Πανάκειαν καὶ θεοὺς πάντας τε καὶ πάσας, ἵστορας ποιεύμενος, ἐπιτελέα ποιήσειν κατὰ δύναμιν καὶ κρίσιν ἐμὴν ὅρκον τόνδε καὶ συγγραφὴν τήνδε:

ἡγήσεσθαι μὲν τὸν διδάξαντά με τὴν τέχνην ταύτην ἴσα γενέτῃσιν ἐμοῖς, καὶ βίου κοινώσεσθαι, καὶ χρεῶν χρηΐζοντι μετάδοσιν ποιήσεσθαι, καὶ γένος τὸ ἐξ αὐτοῦ ἀδελφοῖς ἴσον ἐπικρινεῖν ἄρρεσι, καὶ διδάξειν τὴν τέχνην ταύτην, ἢν χρηΐζωσι μανθάνειν, ἄνευ μισθοῦ καὶ συγγραφῆς, παραγγελίης τε καὶ ἀκροήσιος καὶ τῆς λοίπης ἁπάσης μαθήσιος μετάδοσιν ποιήσεσθαι υἱοῖς τε ἐμοῖς καὶ τοῖς τοῦ ἐμὲ διδάξαντος, καὶ μαθητῇσι συγγεγραμμένοις τε καὶ ὡρκισμένοις νόμῳ ἰητρικῷ, ἄλλῳ δὲ οὐδενί.

διαιτήμασί τε χρήσομαι ἐπ᾽ ὠφελείῃ καμνόντων κατὰ δύναμιν καὶ κρίσιν ἐμήν, ἐπὶ δηλήσει δὲ καὶ ἀδικίῃ εἴρξειν.

οὐ δώσω δὲ οὐδὲ φάρμακον οὐδενὶ αἰτηθεὶς θανάσιμον, οὐδὲ ὑφηγήσομαι συμβουλίην τοιήνδε: ὁμοίως δὲ οὐδὲ γυναικὶ πεσσὸν φθόριον δώσω.

ἁγνῶς δὲ καὶ ὁσίως διατηρήσω βίον τὸν ἐμὸν καὶ τέχνην τὴν ἐμήν.

οὐ τεμέω δὲ οὐδὲ μὴν λιθιῶντας, ἐκχωρήσω δὲ ἐργάτῃσιν ἀνδράσι πρήξιος τῆσδε.

ἐς οἰκίας δὲ ὁκόσας ἂν ἐσίω, ἐσελεύσομαι ἐπ᾽ ὠφελείῃ καμνόντων, ἐκτὸς ἐὼν πάσης ἀδικίης ἑκουσίης καὶ φθορίης, τῆς τε ἄλλης καὶ ἀφροδισίων ἔργων ἐπί τε γυναικείων σωμάτων καὶ ἀνδρῴων, ἐλευθέρων τε καὶ δούλων.

ἃ δ᾽ ἂν ἐνθεραπείῃ ἴδω ἢ ἀκούσω, ἢ καὶ ἄνευ θεραπείης κατὰ βίον ἀνθρώπων, ἃ μὴ χρή ποτε ἐκλαλεῖσθαι ἔξω, σιγήσομαι, ἄρρητα ἡγεύμενος εἶναι τὰ τοιαῦτα.

ὅρκον μὲν οὖν μοι τόνδε ἐπιτελέα ποιέοντι, καὶ μὴ συγχέοντι, εἴη ἐπαύρασθαι καὶ βίου καὶ τέχνης δοξαζομένῳ παρὰ πᾶσιν ἀνθρώποις ἐς τὸν αἰεὶ χρόνον: παραβαίνοντι δὲ καὶ ἐπιορκέοντι, τἀναντία τούτων.

I swear by Apollo Healer, by Asclepius, by Hygieia, by Panacea, and by all the gods and goddesses, making them my witnesses, that I will carry out, according to my ability and judgment, this oath and this indenture.

To hold my teacher in this art equal to my own parents; to make him partner in my livelihood; when he is in need of money to share mine with him; to consider his family as my own brothers, and to teach them this art, if they want to learn it, without fee or indenture; to impart precept, oral instruction, and all other instruction to my own sons, the sons of my teacher, and to indentured pupils who have taken the Healer's oath, but to nobody else.

I will use those dietary regimens which will benefit my patients according to my greatest ability and judgment, and I will do no harm or injustice to them. Neither will I administer a poison to anybody when asked to do so, nor will I suggest such a course. Similarly I will not give to a woman a pessary to cause abortion. But I will keep pure and holy both my life and my art. I will not use the knife, not even, verily, on sufferers from stone, but I will give place to such as are craftsmen therein.

Into whatsoever houses I enter, I will enter to help the sick, and I will abstain from all intentional wrong-doing and harm, especially from abusing the bodies of man or woman, bond or free. And whatsoever I shall see or hear in the course of my profession, as well as outside my profession in my intercourse with men, if it be what should not be published abroad, I will never divulge, holding such things to be holy secrets.

Now if I carry out this oath, and break it not, may I gain for ever reputation among all men for my life and for my art; but if I break it and forswear myself, may the opposite befall me.

—Translation by W.H.S. Jones

"First do no harm"

Main article: Primum non nocere

It is often said that "First do no harm" (Latin: Primum non nocere) is a part of the original Hippocratic oath. A related phrase is found in Epidemics, Book I, of the Hippocratic school: "Practice two things in your dealings with disease: either help or do not harm the patient". Although no such phrase from which "First" or "Primum" can be translated appears in any well recognized version of the oath, a similar intention is vowed by, "I will abstain from all intentional wrong-doing and harm". "Primum non nocere" was claimed by the 19th-century English surgeon Thomas Inman to date from the 17th-century English physician Thomas Sydenham, but Sydenham's available writings contain no such phrase or equivalent, and it more likely took shape from longstanding popular nonmedical expression.

Context and interpretation

A 12th-century Greek manuscript of the oath

The oath is arguably the best known text of the Hippocratic Corpus, although most modern scholars do not attribute it to Hippocrates himself, estimating it to have been written in the fourth or fifth century BC. Alternatively, classical scholar Ludwig Edelstein proposed that the oath was written by the Pythagoreans, an idea that others questioned for lack of evidence for a school of Pythagorean medicine. While Pythagorean philosophy displays a correlation to the Oath's values, the proposal of a direct relationship has been mostly discredited in more recent studies.

Its general ethical principles are also found in other works of the Corpus: the Physician mentions the obligation to keep the "holy things" of medicine within the medical community (i.e. not to divulge secrets); it also mentions the special position of the doctor with regard to his patients, especially women and girls. However, several aspects of the oath contradict patterns of practice established elsewhere in the Corpus. Most notable is its ban on the use of the knife, even for small procedures such as lithotomy, even though other works in the Corpus provide guidance on performing surgical procedures.

Providing poisonous drugs would certainly have been viewed as immoral by contemporary physicians if it resulted in murder. However, the absolute ban described in the oath also forbids euthanasia. Several accounts of ancient physicians willingly assisting suicides have survived. Multiple explanations for the prohibition of euthanasia in the oath have been proposed: it is possible that not all physicians swore the oath, or that the oath was seeking to prevent widely held concerns that physicians could be employed as political assassins.

The interpreted AD 275 fragment of the oath contains a prohibition of abortion that is in contradiction to original Hippocratic text On the Nature of the Child, which contains a description of an abortion, without any implication that it was morally wrong, and descriptions of abortifacient medications are numerous in the ancient medical literature. The oath's stance on abortion was unclear even in the ancient world where physicians debated whether the specification of pessaries was a ban on simply pessaries, or a blanket ban on all abortion methods. Scribonius Largus was adamant in AD 43 (the earliest surviving reference to the oath) that it precluded abortion. In the 1st or 2nd century AD work Gynaecology, Soranus of Ephesus wrote that one party of medical practitioners followed the Oath and banished all abortifacients, while the other party—to which he belonged—was willing to prescribe abortions, but only for the sake of the mother's health. William Henry Samuel Jones states that "abortion  though doctors are forbidden to cause it, was possibly not condemned in all cases". He believed that the oath prohibited abortions, though not under all circumstances. John M. Riddle argues that because Hippocrates specified pessaries, he only meant pessaries and therefore it was acceptable for a Hippocratic doctor to perform abortions using oral drugs, violent means, a disruption of daily routine or eating habits, and more. Other scholars, most notably Ludwig Edelstein, believe that the author intended to prohibit any and all abortions. Olivia De Brabandere writes that regardless of the author's original intention, the vague and polyvalent nature of the relevant line has allowed both professionals and non-professionals to interpret and use the oath in several ways. While many Christian versions of the Hippocratic Oath, particularly from the Middle Ages, explicitly prohibited abortion, the prohibition is often omitted from many oaths taken in US medical schools today, though it remains controversial.

The oath stands out among comparable ancient texts on medical ethics and professionalism through its heavily religious tone, a factor which makes attributing its authorship to Hippocrates particularly difficult. Phrases such as "but I will keep pure and holy both my life and my art" suggest a deep, almost monastic devotion to the art of medicine. He who keeps to the oath is promised "reputation among all men for my life and for my art". This contrasts heavily with Galenic writings on professional ethics, which employ a far more pragmatic approach, where good practice is defined as effective practice, without reference to deities.

The oath's importance among the medical community is nonetheless attested by its appearance on the tombstones of physicians, and by the fourth century AD it had come to stand for the medical profession.

The oath continued to be in use in the Byzantine Christian world with its references to pagan deities replaced by a Christian preamble, as in the 12th-century manuscript pictured in the shape of a cross.

Modern versions and relevance

An engraving of Hippocrates by Peter Paul Rubens, 1638

The Hippocratic Oath has been eclipsed as a document of professional ethics by more extensive, regularly updated ethical codes issued by national medical associations, such as the American Medical Association's Code of Medical Ethics (first adopted in 1847), and the British General Medical Council's Good Medical Practice. These documents provide a comprehensive overview of the obligations and professional behaviour of a doctor to their patients and wider society. Doctors who violate these codes may be subjected to disciplinary proceedings, including the loss of their license to practice medicine. Nonetheless, the length of these documents has made their distillations into shorter oaths an attractive proposition. In light of this fact, several updates to the oath have been offered in modern times, some facetious.

The oath has been modified numerous times.

One of the most significant revisions was first drafted in 1948 by the World Medical Association (WMA), called the Declaration of Geneva. "During the post World War II and immediately after its foundation, the WMA showed concern over the state of medical ethics in general and over the world. The WMA took up the responsibility for setting ethical guidelines for the world's physicians. It noted that in those years the custom of medical schools to administer an oath to its doctors upon graduation or receiving a license to practice medicine had fallen into disuse or become a mere formality". In Nazi Germany, medical students did not take the Hippocratic Oath, although they knew the ethic of "nil nocere"—do no harm.

In the 1960s, the Hippocratic Oath was changed to require "utmost respect for human life from its beginning", making it a more secular obligation, not to be taken in the presence of any gods, but before only other people. When the oath was rewritten in 1964 by Louis Lasagna, Academic Dean of the School of Medicine at Tufts University, the prayer was omitted, and that version has been widely accepted and is still in use today by many US medical schools:

I swear to fulfill, to the best of my ability and judgment, this covenant:

I will respect the hard-won scientific gains of those physicians in whose steps I walk, and gladly share such knowledge as is mine with those who are to follow.

I will apply, for the benefit of the sick, all measures are required, avoiding those twin traps of overtreatment and therapeutic nihilism.

I will remember that there is art to medicine as well as science, and that warmth, sympathy, and understanding may outweigh the surgeon's knife or the chemist's drug.

I will not be ashamed to say "I know not", nor will I fail to call in my colleagues when the skills of another are needed for a patient's recovery.

I will respect the privacy of my patients, for their problems are not disclosed to me that the world may know. Most especially must I tread with care in matters of life and death. If it is given me to save a life, all thanks. But it may also be within my power to take a life; this awesome responsibility must be faced with great humbleness and awareness of my own frailty. Above all, I must not play at God.

I will remember that I do not treat a fever chart, a cancerous growth, but a sick human being, whose illness may affect the person's family and economic stability. My responsibility includes these related problems, if I am to care adequately for the sick.

I will prevent disease whenever I can, for prevention is preferable to cure.

I will remember that I remain a member of society, with special obligations to all my fellow human beings, those sound of mind and body as well as the infirm.

If I do not violate this oath, may I enjoy life and art, respected while I live and remembered with affection thereafter. May I always act so as to preserve the finest traditions of my calling and may I long experience the joy of healing those who seek my help.

In a 1989 survey of 126 US medical schools, only three of them reported use of the original oath, while thirty-three used the Declaration of Geneva, sixty-seven used a modified Hippocratic Oath, four used the Oath of Maimonides, one used a covenant, eight used another oath, one used an unknown oath, and two did not use any kind of oath. Seven medical schools did not reply to the survey.

As of 1993, only 14% of medical oaths prohibited euthanasia, and only 8% prohibited abortion.

In a 2000 survey of US medical schools, all of the then extant medical schools administered some type of professional oath. Among schools of modern medicine, sixty-two of 122 used the Hippocratic Oath, or a modified version of it. The other sixty schools used the original or modified Declaration of Geneva, Oath of Maimonides, or an oath authored by students or faculty or both. All nineteen osteopathic schools in the United States used the Osteopathic Oath, which is taken in place of or in addition to the Hippocratic Oath. The Osteopathic Oath was first used in 1938, and the current version has been in use since 1954.

In France, it is common for new medical graduates to sign a written oath.

In 1995, Sir Joseph Rotblat, in his acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize, suggested a Hippocratic Oath for Scientists.

In November 2005, Saparmurat Niyazov, then leader of Turkmenistan, declared that doctors should swear an oath to him instead of the Hippocratic Oath.

In 2007, US citizen Rafiq Abdus Sabir was convicted for making a pledge to al-Qaeda, thus agreeing to provide medical aid to wounded terrorists.

As of 2018, all US medical school graduates made some form of public oath but none used the original Hippocratic Oath. A modified form or an oath unique to that school is often used. A review of 18 of these oaths was criticized for their wide variability: "Consistency would help society see that physicians are members of a profession that's committed to a shared set of essential ethical values."

Violations

There is no direct punishment for breaking the Hippocratic Oath, although an arguable equivalent in modern times is medical malpractice, which carries a wide range of punishments, from imprisonment to civil penalties. Medical professionals may also be subject to other parts of the criminal and civil law for conduct contrary to both an oath taken and to a more general prohibition on, for example, doing physical or other harm to other persons. In the United States, several major judicial decisions have made reference to the classical Hippocratic Oath, either upholding or dismissing its bounds for medical ethics: Roe v. Wade, Washington v. Harper, Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington (1996), and Thorburn v. Department of Corrections (1998). In antiquity, the punishment for breaking the Hippocratic oath could range from a penalty to losing the right to practice medicine.

In 2022, at a college in the Indian state of Tamil Nadu, medical students took the Charaka shapath, a Sanskrit oath attributed to ancient sage and physician Maharishi Charak instead of the Hippocratic oath. The state government subsequently dismissed the Dean of the Madurai medical college for this act. However, he was reinstated by the Tamil Nadu government and assumed office 4 days later.

See also

Ethical codes of conduct for physicians
Ethical principles for human experimentation
Ethical practices for engineers
Science

References

  1. Edelstein, Ludwig (1943). The Hippocratic Oath: Text, Translation and Interpretation. Johns Hopkins Press. p. 56. ISBN 978-0-8018-0184-6.
  2. "Codices urbinates graeci Bibliothecae Vaticanae: Folio 64(Urb.gr.64)". Vatican Library: DigiVatLib. 900–1100. p. folio:116 microfilm: 121.
  3. North, Michael (2002). "Greek Medicine: "I Swear by Apollo Physician...": Green Medicine from the Gods to Galen". National Institute of Health; National Library of Medicine; History of Medicine Division.
  4. Wecheli, Andreae (1595). "Hippocrates. Τα ενρισκομενα Opera omnia". Frankfurt: National Institute of Health; National Library of Medicine; History of Medicine Division).
  5. ^ Hippocrates of Cos (1923). "The Oath". Loeb Classical Library. 147: 298–299. doi:10.4159/DLCL.hippocrates_cos-oath.1923. Retrieved 6 October 2015.
  6. "Greek Medicine – The Hippocratic Oath". www.nlm.nih.gov. National Library of Medicine – NIH. Retrieved 29 July 2020.
  7. Lloyd, Geoffrey, ed. (1983). Hippocratic Writings (2nd ed.). London: Penguin Books. pp. 94. ISBN 978-0-14-044451-3.
  8. Sokol, Daniel K. (2013). "'First do no harm' revisited". BMJ. 347: f6426. doi:10.1136/bmj.f6426. PMID 24163087. S2CID 33952216. Retrieved 20 September 2014.
  9. Smith, C. M. (2005). "Origin and Uses of Primum Non Nocere – Above All, Do No Harm!". The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 45 (4): 371–77. doi:10.1177/0091270004273680. PMID 15778417. S2CID 41058798.
  10. Suss, Richard A. (November 21, 2024). "First Do No Harm Is Proverbial, Not Hippocratic". OSF Preprints. doi:10.31219/osf.io/c23jq.
  11. Jouanna, Jacques (2001). Hippocrates. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-6818-4.
  12. Temkin, Owsei (2002). "On second thought" and other essays in the history of medicine and science. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-6774-3.
  13. Askitopoulou, Helen; Vgontzas, Antoniοs N. (2018-07-01). "The relevance of the Hippocratic Oath to the ethical and moral values of contemporary medicine. Part I: The Hippocratic Oath from antiquity to modern times". European Spine Journal. 27 (7): 1481–1490. doi:10.1007/s00586-017-5348-4. ISSN 1432-0932. PMID 29080001. S2CID 10142596.
  14. Potter, Paul, ed. (1995). Hippocrates (Reprint ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Univ. Press u.a. pp. 295–315. ISBN 978-0-674-99531-4.
  15. Nutton, Vivian (2012). Ancient medicine (2nd ed.). Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. p. 68. ISBN 978-0-415-52095-9.
  16. Edelstein, Ludwig (1967). Ancient Medicine: Selected Papers of Ludwig Edelstein. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins Press. pp. 9–15. ISBN 978-0-8018-0183-9.
  17. ^ Markel, Howard (2004). ""I Swear by Apollo" – On Taking the Hippocratic Oath" (PDF). The New England Journal of Medicine. 350 (20). Massachusetts Medical Society: 2026–2029. doi:10.1056/NEJMp048092. PMID 15141039. Retrieved 1 March 2017.
  18. Lonie, Iain M. (1981). The Hippocratic treatises, "On generation," "On the nature of the child," "Diseases IV" a commentary. Berlin: De Gruyter. p. 7. ISBN 978-3-11-086396-3.
  19. King, Helen (1998). Hippocrates' woman: reading the female body in ancient Greece. London: Routledge. pp. 132–156. ISBN 978-0-415-13895-6.
  20. ^ De Brabandere, Olivia (2018). The "Hippocratic" Stance on Abortion: The Translation, Interpretation, and Use of the Hippocratic Oath in the Abortion Debate from the Ancient World to Present-Day (Master of Arts thesis). Queen's University. pp. 3–4, 7, 58.
  21. ^ "Scribonius Largus"
  22. Soranus, Owsei Temkin (1956). Soranus' Gynecology. I.19.60: JHU Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-4320-4. Retrieved 6 October 2015.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
  23. Wear, Andrew; Geyer-Kordesch, Johanna; French, Roger Kenneth, eds. (1993). Doctors and Ethics: The Earlier Historical Setting of Professional Ethics. Amsterdam: Rodopi. pp. 10–37.
  24. von Staden, H (1996). "In a pure and holy way. Personal and professional conduct in the Hippocratic Oath". Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences. 51 (4): 404–437. doi:10.1093/jhmas/51.4.404. PMID 9019063.
  25. Nutton, Vivian (2012). Ancient medicine (2nd ed.). Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. p. 415, note 87. ISBN 978-0-415-52095-9.
  26. Buchholz B, et al. Prohibición de la litotomía y derivación a expertos en los juramentos médicos de la genealogía hipocrática. Actas Urologicas Espanolas. Volume 40, Issue 10, December 2016, Pages 640–645.
  27. Oswald, H.; Phelan, P. D.; Lanigan, A.; Hibbert, M.; Bowes, G.; Olinsky, A. (1994). "Outcome of childhood asthma in mid-adult life". BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.). 309 (6947): 95–96. doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6947.95. PMC 2540578. PMID 8038676.
  28. Schiedermayer, D. L. (1986). "The Hippocratic Oath — Corporate Version". New England Journal of Medicine. 314 (1): 62. doi:10.1056/NEJM198601023140122. PMID 3940324.
  29. World Medical Association, Inc. "WMA History". www.wma.net. World Medical Association, Inc. Archived from the original on 6 February 2015. Retrieved 1 November 2014.
  30. Baumslag, Naomi (2005). Murderous Medicine: Nazi Doctors, Human Experimentation, and Typhus. Praeger Publishers. pp. xxv. ISBN 978-0-275-98312-3.
  31. "The Hippocratic Oath Today". PBS. 27 March 2001.
  32. Crawshaw, R (8 October 1994). "The Hippocratic oath. Is alive and well in North America". BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.). 309 (6959): 952–953. doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6959.952. PMC 2541124. PMID 7950672.
  33. Markel, Howard (2004). ""I Swear by Apollo" — On Taking the Hippocratic Oath" (PDF). The New England Journal of Medicine. 350 (20). Massachusetts Medical Society: 2026–9. doi:10.1056/NEJMp048092. PMID 15141039. Retrieved 1 March 2017.
  34. Kao, AC; Parsi, KP (September 2004). "Content analyses of oaths administered at U.S. medical schools in 2000". Academic Medicine. 79 (9): 882–7. doi:10.1097/00001888-200409000-00015. PMID 15326016.
  35. "Osteopathic Oath". American Osteopathic Association. Retrieved 28 November 2014.
  36. Sritharan, Kaji; Georgina Russell; Zoe Fritz; Davina Wong; Matthew Rollin; Jake Dunning; Bruce Wayne; Philip Morgan; Catherine Sheehan (December 2000). "Medical oaths and declarations". BMJ. 323 (7327): 1440–1. doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7327.1440. PMC 1121898. PMID 11751345.
  37. Crawshaw, R; Pennington, T H; Pennington, C I; Reiss, H; Loudon, I (October 1994). "Letters". BMJ. 309 (6959): 952–953. doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6959.952. PMC 2541124. PMID 7950672.
  38. "Nobel Prize winner calls for ethics oath". Physics World. 19 December 1997. Retrieved 2008-07-19.
  39. "Turkmen Doctors Pledge Allegiance To Niyazov". RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty. 15 November 2005. Retrieved 24 August 2024.
  40. "Trial and Terror". Archived from the original on 2021-05-07. Retrieved 2021-05-07.
  41. Weiner, Stacey (10 July 2018). "The solemn truth about medical oaths". aamc.org. American Association of Medical Colleges. Retrieved 17 June 2022.
  42. Groner M.D., Johnathan (2008). "The Hippocratic Paradox: The Role of The Medical Profession In Capital Punishment In The United States". Fordham Urban Law.
  43. Hasday, Lisa (23 February 2013). "The Hippocratic Oath as Literary Text: A Dialogue". Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics. 2 (2): Article 4. Retrieved 6 October 2015.
  44. Nutton, Vivian (2004). Ancient Medicine. New York, NY: Routledge.
  45. "Madurai college dean removed after MBBS students take 'Charak Shapath'". The News Minute. 2022-05-01. Retrieved 2022-05-02.
  46. "Sanskrit replaces Hippocratic Oath; Tamil Nadu shunts out Madurai Medical College dean". Deccan Herald. 2022-05-01. Retrieved 2022-05-02.
  47. "TN medical college dean removed after row over Charak Shapath". Google News. Retrieved 2022-05-02.
  48. https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil-nadu/2022/May/06/charak-shapath-row-a-rathinavel-returns-as-dean-of-madurai-medical-college-2450259.html

Further reading

External links

Portal: Categories: