Misplaced Pages

Talk:Seuna (Yadava) dynasty: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:23, 25 September 2006 editDineshkannambadi (talk | contribs)Rollbackers29,841 edits Nothing disgusting about History if you open your eyes~~~~← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:42, 10 October 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,292,140 editsm Archiving 13 discussion(s) to Talk:Seuna (Yadava) dynasty/Archive 2) (bot 
(145 intermediate revisions by 50 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User:MiszaBot/config
==Kannadi marketing==
| algo = old(730d)
This article is another case of Kannadi marketing.Plz see the article for how Kannada is being glorified against Marathi and Sanskrit.I will be shortly getting reference to end up this Kannadisation for I am pretty sure about the Yadavas and Marathi being official language during their reign.Merging Yadavs with Seuns is infact unwarrented.
| minthreadsleft = 2

| minthreadstoarchive = 1
If I rememeber this article is about 2-3rd in row including ] ].This is very disguisting.Few users are deliberately moulding history to satisfy their lingual fanaticsm.They are well-equiped with nonsense and crappy sources like that of Kannadi fanatic Mr.Kamath.Nonetheless,I am sure I shall be getting a good citation to wipe out this utter nonsense which endorses karnataka.
| counter = 2
] 08:08, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
| archive = Talk:Seuna (Yadava) dynasty/Archive %(counter)d
| maxarchivesize = 75k
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
}}
{{Skip to talk}}
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject India|importance=low|karnataka=yes|karnataka-importance=mid|maharashtra=yes|maharashtra-importance=mid|history=yes|history-importance=mid|assess-date=March 2012}}
{{WikiProject History|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Former countries}}
{{WikiProject Jainism|importance=low}}
}}
{{contentious topics/page restriction talk notice|protection=semi|ipa}}


== Nothing disgusting about History if you open your eyes] 14:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC) == == Nothing disgusting about History if you open your eyes] 14:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC) ==


There is nothing disgusting nor is their any Kannadaization of this article as you claim. Read books and then talk. People without knowledge or the habit of acquiring it should not post blatant comments. All info has been sourced from reliable reference source which has been provided. In fact I intend to work on this next more closely , with an additional source (scholarly ofcourse). Your lack of historiacal knowledge is your loss. There is nothing disgusting nor is their any Kannadaization of this article as you claim. Read books and then talk. People without knowledge or the habit of acquiring it should not post blatant comments. All info has been sourced from reliable reference source which has been provided. In fact I intend to work on this next more closely , with an additional source (scholarly ofcourse). Your lack of historiacal knowledge is your loss. If you try to remove any material without arbitration, you will find youself in a soup and quit cribbing about Vijayanagar empire, you cant do anything there. I am fully sourced from 4 different sources of research.

== Maharashtra history is intimately tied to Karnataka History] 15:02, 25 September 2006 (UTC) ==

The day you guys realise this, much of the disputes will go away. Unfortunately as I have stated earlier, politicials and false history propaganda machinery has I believe hidden much of real history from Indians. I am not saying this with malice against any particular state.

Regarding the Yadavas or Seunas, remember that they were feudatories first of the Rashtrakuta
(late period of Rashtrakuta) and all the way thru the Kalyani Chalukya rule before declaring independence. I have quoted the names of the Kannada scholars in the Suena court, their works etc. I have also given balanced info about the arrival of Marathi literature only because thats what the source says. I have done this without any prejudice or personal gains. Its upto you to see this with an open mind. Feel free to bring other sources. In fact I can quote you a source other then Kamath (Since you hate him). Please take time to read history first and discuss and Tag. Creating alternate pages for the same topic based on challenge and ego is not acceptable to either history or probably wikipedia.

Dinesh Kannambadi

== Insecurity] 15:33, 25 September 2006 (UTC) ==

Forgot to log in earlier. Lets not forget you received a similar message from your friend Arya also when he came across the Seuna page.

== Common history] 13:14, 26 September 2006 (UTC) ==

When I said the history of Karnataka and Maharashtra are tied together, it was meant to be a Phylosophical statement to help develop friendship and appreciate history and discard acrimony. It was not meant to be a derogatory statement. I would not take it as one if the same statement had come from one of you guys. Infact, India is a product of a ''Sum Contribution'' and thats what I was trying to emphasise on. Being neighbouring states, this is all the more true. Did you know that ], father of carnatic music was born in Pandharapur, Maharashtra. Dont we consider him our own?. I did not realise that being tied to ''Kannadis'' was such an offence to you guys. However whatever may be your reaction, I intend to complete this page in detail from other sources. There are always people who acknowledge and others who dont.
Also, regarding my article on Belgaum page, I have always regretted having written that.

Dinesh Kannambadi

== decency ==

Please have the decency to intimate the person (myself) who has taken the trouble to put together this page before making large scale modifications and {{Tl|Fact}} tags. I understand we all have the right to make edits, but that does not mean you get together and just start doing things because it suits you. The least one of you could do (not the two illmannered guys Mahawiki and Arya Raajya whatever...) is intimate me so I could be involved. After all, there is nothing you guys can do to disprove the facts I have put there.

Dineshkannambadi

== walk before you run ==

Read the book. All references have been provided. It does not matter who changed it. We all make mistakes.

Dineshkannambadi

== citations ==

Sir, I have reverted back to your version but added my citations to the places where you put {{Fact}. You have asked me ''Which research''? for many points on the page. Sir, I think this is a question best asked to Dr. Kamath himself. I have merely quoted the scholar himself thats all. If you ask me which research, am I supposed to ask Dr. Kamath, which research?? We are supposed to trust our historians to some extent otherwise Dr. Kamath would not be given a ''Sahitya Academy award'' for this origianl work in 1973.

I hope you understand my point.

Dineshkannambadi

== Rathors of Baglan ==

It is probable that at this date the Rathors of Baglan were tributaries of the Yadavas of Deogiri.


Imperial gazetteer of India: Provincial series, Volume 8



http://books.google.co.in/books?ei=V8OiTc2eJ4vQrQen85D7Ag&ct=result&id=Ph62AAAAIAAJ&dq=yadavs+are+rathors&q=Rathors+of+Baglan+
Dinesh KAnnambadi

Latest revision as of 16:42, 10 October 2024

Skip to table of contents
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Seuna (Yadava) dynasty article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconIndia: Karnataka / Maharashtra / History Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Karnataka (assessed as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
Note icon
This article was last assessed in March 2012.
WikiProject iconHistory High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconFormer countries
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country
WikiProject iconJainism Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Jainism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Jainism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

  • You must be logged-in to an autoconfirmed or confirmed account (usually granted automatically to accounts with 10 edits and an age of 4 days)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Nothing disgusting about History if you open your eyesDineshkannambadi 14:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

There is nothing disgusting nor is their any Kannadaization of this article as you claim. Read books and then talk. People without knowledge or the habit of acquiring it should not post blatant comments. All info has been sourced from reliable reference source which has been provided. In fact I intend to work on this next more closely , with an additional source (scholarly ofcourse). Your lack of historiacal knowledge is your loss. If you try to remove any material without arbitration, you will find youself in a soup and quit cribbing about Vijayanagar empire, you cant do anything there. I am fully sourced from 4 different sources of research.

Maharashtra history is intimately tied to Karnataka History129.42.208.182 15:02, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

The day you guys realise this, much of the disputes will go away. Unfortunately as I have stated earlier, politicials and false history propaganda machinery has I believe hidden much of real history from Indians. I am not saying this with malice against any particular state.

Regarding the Yadavas or Seunas, remember that they were feudatories first of the Rashtrakuta (late period of Rashtrakuta) and all the way thru the Kalyani Chalukya rule before declaring independence. I have quoted the names of the Kannada scholars in the Suena court, their works etc. I have also given balanced info about the arrival of Marathi literature only because thats what the source says. I have done this without any prejudice or personal gains. Its upto you to see this with an open mind. Feel free to bring other sources. In fact I can quote you a source other then Kamath (Since you hate him). Please take time to read history first and discuss and Tag. Creating alternate pages for the same topic based on challenge and ego is not acceptable to either history or probably wikipedia.

Dinesh Kannambadi

InsecurityDineshkannambadi 15:33, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Forgot to log in earlier. Lets not forget you received a similar message from your friend Arya also when he came across the Seuna page.

Common historyDineshkannambadi 13:14, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

When I said the history of Karnataka and Maharashtra are tied together, it was meant to be a Phylosophical statement to help develop friendship and appreciate history and discard acrimony. It was not meant to be a derogatory statement. I would not take it as one if the same statement had come from one of you guys. Infact, India is a product of a Sum Contribution and thats what I was trying to emphasise on. Being neighbouring states, this is all the more true. Did you know that Purandaradasa, father of carnatic music was born in Pandharapur, Maharashtra. Dont we consider him our own?. I did not realise that being tied to Kannadis was such an offence to you guys. However whatever may be your reaction, I intend to complete this page in detail from other sources. There are always people who acknowledge and others who dont. Also, regarding my article on Belgaum page, I have always regretted having written that.

Dinesh Kannambadi

decency

Please have the decency to intimate the person (myself) who has taken the trouble to put together this page before making large scale modifications and {{Fact}} tags. I understand we all have the right to make edits, but that does not mean you get together and just start doing things because it suits you. The least one of you could do (not the two illmannered guys Mahawiki and Arya Raajya whatever...) is intimate me so I could be involved. After all, there is nothing you guys can do to disprove the facts I have put there.

Dineshkannambadi

walk before you run

Read the book. All references have been provided. It does not matter who changed it. We all make mistakes.

Dineshkannambadi

citations

Sir, I have reverted back to your version but added my citations to the places where you put {{Fact}. You have asked me Which research? for many points on the page. Sir, I think this is a question best asked to Dr. Kamath himself. I have merely quoted the scholar himself thats all. If you ask me which research, am I supposed to ask Dr. Kamath, which research?? We are supposed to trust our historians to some extent otherwise Dr. Kamath would not be given a Sahitya Academy award for this origianl work in 1973.

I hope you understand my point.

Dineshkannambadi

Rathors of Baglan

It is probable that at this date the Rathors of Baglan were tributaries of the Yadavas of Deogiri.


Imperial gazetteer of India: Provincial series, Volume 8


http://books.google.co.in/books?ei=V8OiTc2eJ4vQrQen85D7Ag&ct=result&id=Ph62AAAAIAAJ&dq=yadavs+are+rathors&q=Rathors+of+Baglan+

Categories: