Revision as of 14:23, 25 September 2006 editDineshkannambadi (talk | contribs)Rollbackers29,841 edits Nothing disgusting about History if you open your eyes~~~~← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:42, 10 October 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,292,140 editsm Archiving 13 discussion(s) to Talk:Seuna (Yadava) dynasty/Archive 2) (bot | ||
(145 intermediate revisions by 50 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
==Kannadi marketing== | |||
| algo = old(730d) | |||
This article is another case of Kannadi marketing.Plz see the article for how Kannada is being glorified against Marathi and Sanskrit.I will be shortly getting reference to end up this Kannadisation for I am pretty sure about the Yadavas and Marathi being official language during their reign.Merging Yadavs with Seuns is infact unwarrented. | |||
| minthreadsleft = 2 | |||
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |||
If I rememeber this article is about 2-3rd in row including ] ].This is very disguisting.Few users are deliberately moulding history to satisfy their lingual fanaticsm.They are well-equiped with nonsense and crappy sources like that of Kannadi fanatic Mr.Kamath.Nonetheless,I am sure I shall be getting a good citation to wipe out this utter nonsense which endorses karnataka. | |||
| counter = 2 | |||
⚫ | ] |
||
| archive = Talk:Seuna (Yadava) dynasty/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| maxarchivesize = 75k | |||
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} | |||
}} | |||
{{Skip to talk}} | |||
{{Talk header}} | |||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1= | |||
{{WikiProject India|importance=low|karnataka=yes|karnataka-importance=mid|maharashtra=yes|maharashtra-importance=mid|history=yes|history-importance=mid|assess-date=March 2012}} | |||
{{WikiProject History|importance=high}} | |||
{{WikiProject Former countries}} | |||
{{WikiProject Jainism|importance=low}} | |||
}} | |||
{{contentious topics/page restriction talk notice|protection=semi|ipa}} | |||
== Nothing disgusting about History if you open your eyes] 14:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC) == | == Nothing disgusting about History if you open your eyes] 14:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC) == | ||
There is nothing disgusting nor is their any Kannadaization of this article as you claim. Read books and then talk. People without knowledge or the habit of acquiring it should not post blatant comments. All info has been sourced from reliable reference source which has been provided. In fact I intend to work on this next more closely , with an additional source (scholarly ofcourse). Your lack of historiacal knowledge is your loss. | There is nothing disgusting nor is their any Kannadaization of this article as you claim. Read books and then talk. People without knowledge or the habit of acquiring it should not post blatant comments. All info has been sourced from reliable reference source which has been provided. In fact I intend to work on this next more closely , with an additional source (scholarly ofcourse). Your lack of historiacal knowledge is your loss. If you try to remove any material without arbitration, you will find youself in a soup and quit cribbing about Vijayanagar empire, you cant do anything there. I am fully sourced from 4 different sources of research. | ||
== Maharashtra history is intimately tied to Karnataka History] 15:02, 25 September 2006 (UTC) == | |||
The day you guys realise this, much of the disputes will go away. Unfortunately as I have stated earlier, politicials and false history propaganda machinery has I believe hidden much of real history from Indians. I am not saying this with malice against any particular state. | |||
Regarding the Yadavas or Seunas, remember that they were feudatories first of the Rashtrakuta | |||
(late period of Rashtrakuta) and all the way thru the Kalyani Chalukya rule before declaring independence. I have quoted the names of the Kannada scholars in the Suena court, their works etc. I have also given balanced info about the arrival of Marathi literature only because thats what the source says. I have done this without any prejudice or personal gains. Its upto you to see this with an open mind. Feel free to bring other sources. In fact I can quote you a source other then Kamath (Since you hate him). Please take time to read history first and discuss and Tag. Creating alternate pages for the same topic based on challenge and ego is not acceptable to either history or probably wikipedia. | |||
⚫ | Dinesh Kannambadi | ||
⚫ | == Insecurity] 15:33, 25 September 2006 (UTC) == | ||
Forgot to log in earlier. Lets not forget you received a similar message from your friend Arya also when he came across the Seuna page. | |||
== Common history] 13:14, 26 September 2006 (UTC) == | |||
When I said the history of Karnataka and Maharashtra are tied together, it was meant to be a Phylosophical statement to help develop friendship and appreciate history and discard acrimony. It was not meant to be a derogatory statement. I would not take it as one if the same statement had come from one of you guys. Infact, India is a product of a ''Sum Contribution'' and thats what I was trying to emphasise on. Being neighbouring states, this is all the more true. Did you know that ], father of carnatic music was born in Pandharapur, Maharashtra. Dont we consider him our own?. I did not realise that being tied to ''Kannadis'' was such an offence to you guys. However whatever may be your reaction, I intend to complete this page in detail from other sources. There are always people who acknowledge and others who dont. | |||
Also, regarding my article on Belgaum page, I have always regretted having written that. | |||
Dinesh Kannambadi | |||
== decency == | |||
Please have the decency to intimate the person (myself) who has taken the trouble to put together this page before making large scale modifications and {{Tl|Fact}} tags. I understand we all have the right to make edits, but that does not mean you get together and just start doing things because it suits you. The least one of you could do (not the two illmannered guys Mahawiki and Arya Raajya whatever...) is intimate me so I could be involved. After all, there is nothing you guys can do to disprove the facts I have put there. | |||
Dineshkannambadi | |||
== walk before you run == | |||
Read the book. All references have been provided. It does not matter who changed it. We all make mistakes. | |||
Dineshkannambadi | |||
== citations == | |||
Sir, I have reverted back to your version but added my citations to the places where you put {{Fact}. You have asked me ''Which research''? for many points on the page. Sir, I think this is a question best asked to Dr. Kamath himself. I have merely quoted the scholar himself thats all. If you ask me which research, am I supposed to ask Dr. Kamath, which research?? We are supposed to trust our historians to some extent otherwise Dr. Kamath would not be given a ''Sahitya Academy award'' for this origianl work in 1973. | |||
I hope you understand my point. | |||
Dineshkannambadi | |||
== Rathors of Baglan == | |||
It is probable that at this date the Rathors of Baglan were tributaries of the Yadavas of Deogiri. | |||
Imperial gazetteer of India: Provincial series, Volume 8 | |||
http://books.google.co.in/books?ei=V8OiTc2eJ4vQrQen85D7Ag&ct=result&id=Ph62AAAAIAAJ&dq=yadavs+are+rathors&q=Rathors+of+Baglan+ | |||
⚫ | Dinesh |
Latest revision as of 16:42, 10 October 2024
Skip to table of contents |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Seuna (Yadava) dynasty article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Nothing disgusting about History if you open your eyesDineshkannambadi 14:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
There is nothing disgusting nor is their any Kannadaization of this article as you claim. Read books and then talk. People without knowledge or the habit of acquiring it should not post blatant comments. All info has been sourced from reliable reference source which has been provided. In fact I intend to work on this next more closely , with an additional source (scholarly ofcourse). Your lack of historiacal knowledge is your loss. If you try to remove any material without arbitration, you will find youself in a soup and quit cribbing about Vijayanagar empire, you cant do anything there. I am fully sourced from 4 different sources of research.
Maharashtra history is intimately tied to Karnataka History129.42.208.182 15:02, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
The day you guys realise this, much of the disputes will go away. Unfortunately as I have stated earlier, politicials and false history propaganda machinery has I believe hidden much of real history from Indians. I am not saying this with malice against any particular state.
Regarding the Yadavas or Seunas, remember that they were feudatories first of the Rashtrakuta (late period of Rashtrakuta) and all the way thru the Kalyani Chalukya rule before declaring independence. I have quoted the names of the Kannada scholars in the Suena court, their works etc. I have also given balanced info about the arrival of Marathi literature only because thats what the source says. I have done this without any prejudice or personal gains. Its upto you to see this with an open mind. Feel free to bring other sources. In fact I can quote you a source other then Kamath (Since you hate him). Please take time to read history first and discuss and Tag. Creating alternate pages for the same topic based on challenge and ego is not acceptable to either history or probably wikipedia.
Dinesh Kannambadi
InsecurityDineshkannambadi 15:33, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Forgot to log in earlier. Lets not forget you received a similar message from your friend Arya also when he came across the Seuna page.
Common historyDineshkannambadi 13:14, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
When I said the history of Karnataka and Maharashtra are tied together, it was meant to be a Phylosophical statement to help develop friendship and appreciate history and discard acrimony. It was not meant to be a derogatory statement. I would not take it as one if the same statement had come from one of you guys. Infact, India is a product of a Sum Contribution and thats what I was trying to emphasise on. Being neighbouring states, this is all the more true. Did you know that Purandaradasa, father of carnatic music was born in Pandharapur, Maharashtra. Dont we consider him our own?. I did not realise that being tied to Kannadis was such an offence to you guys. However whatever may be your reaction, I intend to complete this page in detail from other sources. There are always people who acknowledge and others who dont. Also, regarding my article on Belgaum page, I have always regretted having written that.
Dinesh Kannambadi
decency
Please have the decency to intimate the person (myself) who has taken the trouble to put together this page before making large scale modifications and {{Fact}} tags. I understand we all have the right to make edits, but that does not mean you get together and just start doing things because it suits you. The least one of you could do (not the two illmannered guys Mahawiki and Arya Raajya whatever...) is intimate me so I could be involved. After all, there is nothing you guys can do to disprove the facts I have put there.
Dineshkannambadi
walk before you run
Read the book. All references have been provided. It does not matter who changed it. We all make mistakes.
Dineshkannambadi
citations
Sir, I have reverted back to your version but added my citations to the places where you put {{Fact}. You have asked me Which research? for many points on the page. Sir, I think this is a question best asked to Dr. Kamath himself. I have merely quoted the scholar himself thats all. If you ask me which research, am I supposed to ask Dr. Kamath, which research?? We are supposed to trust our historians to some extent otherwise Dr. Kamath would not be given a Sahitya Academy award for this origianl work in 1973.
I hope you understand my point.
Dineshkannambadi
Rathors of Baglan
It is probable that at this date the Rathors of Baglan were tributaries of the Yadavas of Deogiri.
Imperial gazetteer of India: Provincial series, Volume 8
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-5 vital articles in History
- B-Class vital articles in History
- B-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- B-Class India articles of Low-importance
- B-Class Karnataka articles
- Mid-importance Karnataka articles
- B-Class Karnataka articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Karnataka articles
- B-Class Maharashtra articles
- Mid-importance Maharashtra articles
- B-Class Maharashtra articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Maharashtra articles
- B-Class Indian history articles
- Mid-importance Indian history articles
- B-Class Indian history articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Indian history articles
- WikiProject India articles
- B-Class history articles
- High-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles
- B-Class former country articles
- WikiProject Former countries articles
- B-Class Jainism articles
- Low-importance Jainism articles