| Revision as of 02:09, 27 April 2017 editLibStar (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers114,240 edits Undid revision 777418235 by Doncram (talk) it's closed and don't amend it← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 13:33, 27 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | ||
| The result was '''keep'''. |
The result was '''keep'''. ] (]) 09:40, 27 April 2017 (UTC) | ||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| Line 13: | Line 12: | ||
| fails WP:ORG. could only find 1 gnews hit for its name in Chinese. if someone can find significant coverage in Chinese, I will reconsider. ] (]) 07:34, 26 April 2017 (UTC) | fails WP:ORG. could only find 1 gnews hit for its name in Chinese. if someone can find significant coverage in Chinese, I will reconsider. ] (]) 07:34, 26 April 2017 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''': I found zero significant coverage after multiple searches. Fails ]. ] (]) 16:52, 26 April 2017 (UTC) | *'''Delete''': I found zero significant coverage after multiple searches. Fails ]. ] (]) 16:52, 26 April 2017 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''', obviously. It includes a major temple which does not have a separate article. This is the . Look at the pictures. Try alternate spellings, e.g. the Luerhmen Mazu Temple. It is notable. --]]] 21:02, 26 April 2017 (UTC) | *'''Keep''', obviously. It includes a major temple which does not have a separate article. This is the . Look at the pictures. Try alternate spellings, e.g. the Luerhmen Mazu Temple. It is notable. --]]] 21:02, 26 April 2017 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''', I think. I'm not sure the standards applied to a corporation etc. should be applied to a museum, which is more of a history-thing than an organization-thing... Assuming their website is truthful, "The museum has a rich collection of artifacts from Zheng Chenggong’s time, such as weapons, armor, and books including a map of Taiwan that was made starting in 1703 and completed in 1722" in addition to including the temple and also a historical house. It there was a similar-size museum in Virginia we would probably keep it. Granted, its not well ref'd and according to the nominator can't be. But we should give a little leeway maybe for museums in non-English countries; they are going to harder to source naturally, but are possibly still worthwhile. ] (]) 22:06, 26 April 2017 (UTC) | *'''Keep''', I think. I'm not sure the standards applied to a corporation etc. should be applied to a museum, which is more of a history-thing than an organization-thing... Assuming their website is truthful, "The museum has a rich collection of artifacts from Zheng Chenggong’s time, such as weapons, armor, and books including a map of Taiwan that was made starting in 1703 and completed in 1722" in addition to including the temple and also a historical house. It there was a similar-size museum in Virginia we would probably keep it. Granted, its not well ref'd and according to the nominator can't be. But we should give a little leeway maybe for museums in non-English countries; they are going to harder to source naturally, but are possibly still worthwhile. ] (]) 22:06, 26 April 2017 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''', I've heavily expanded the article, the museum is listed in the Ministry of Culture website of ] (Republic of China), listed in the local gov Tainan City Government website, found coverage of the temple in online news (Focus Taiwan - 2 sources & Taiwan News - 1 source), and it is about ] (Zheng Chenggong) a very famous figure in East Asia. The article is heavily linked to other articles as well. ] (]) 00:23, 27 April 2017 (UTC) | *'''Keep''', I've heavily expanded the article, the museum is listed in the Ministry of Culture website of ] (Republic of China), listed in the local gov Tainan City Government website, found coverage of the temple in online news (Focus Taiwan - 2 sources & Taiwan News - 1 source), and it is about ] (Zheng Chenggong) a very famous figure in East Asia. The article is heavily linked to other articles as well. ] (]) 00:23, 27 April 2017 (UTC) | ||
| {{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:33, 27 February 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Withdrawn by nominator Shirt58 (talk) 09:40, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Luerhmen History and Culture Museum
- Luerhmen History and Culture Museum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:ORG. could only find 1 gnews hit for its name in Chinese. if someone can find significant coverage in Chinese, I will reconsider. LibStar (talk) 07:34, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: I found zero significant coverage after multiple searches. Fails WP:CORP. SL93 (talk) 16:52, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, obviously. It includes a major temple which does not have a separate article. This is the Luermen Matzu Temple. Look at the pictures. Try alternate spellings, e.g. the Luerhmen Mazu Temple. It is notable. --doncram 21:02, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, I think. I'm not sure the standards applied to a corporation etc. should be applied to a museum, which is more of a history-thing than an organization-thing... Assuming their website is truthful, "The museum has a rich collection of artifacts from Zheng Chenggong’s time, such as weapons, armor, and books including a map of Taiwan that was made starting in 1703 and completed in 1722" in addition to including the temple and also a historical house. It there was a similar-size museum in Virginia we would probably keep it. Granted, its not well ref'd and according to the nominator can't be. But we should give a little leeway maybe for museums in non-English countries; they are going to harder to source naturally, but are possibly still worthwhile. Herostratus (talk) 22:06, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, I've heavily expanded the article, the museum is listed in the Ministry of Culture website of Taiwan (Republic of China), listed in the local gov Tainan City Government website, found coverage of the temple in online news (Focus Taiwan - 2 sources & Taiwan News - 1 source), and it is about Koxinga (Zheng Chenggong) a very famous figure in East Asia. The article is heavily linked to other articles as well. Chongkian (talk) 00:23, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.