Misplaced Pages

2005 Quran desecration controversy: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:12, 26 September 2006 edit66.209.214.23 (talk) See also← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:52, 1 December 2024 edit undoPincrete (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers51,205 edits unnecessary bypassing 
(296 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|2005 Islam-related controversy}}{{Islamophobia}}
], ], following allegations that U.S. military personnel had desecrated the Qur'an]]
The '''] controversy of 2005''' captured international attention in April 2005 when '']'' published an article containing allegations that ] personnel at the ] prison camp had deliberately damaged a copy of the book in order to torment the prison's ] captives.


The '''2005 Quran desecration controversy''' began when '']''{{'s}} April 30, 2005, issue contained a report asserting that United States prison guards or interrogators had ] a copy of the ].
For some people, the article confirmed several previous allegations, and a worldwide controversy erupted. The report sparked protests throughout the ] and riots in ], where pre-planned demonstrations turned deadly.
A week later, ''The New Yorker'' reported the words of Pakistani politician ]: "This is what the U.S. is doing—desecrating the Quran." This incident caused violent unrest in some parts of the Muslim world.<ref name="NewYorker20050530">
{{cite news
| url=https://www.newyorker.com/archive/2005/05/30/050530ta_talk_hertzberg
| title=Big News Week
| publisher=]
| author=Hendrik Hertzberg
| author-link=Hendrik Hertzberg
| date=May 30, 2005
| access-date=2007-12-24
| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20071113063810/http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2005/05/30/050530ta_talk_hertzberg| archive-date= 13 November 2007 | url-status= live}}</ref>


The ''Newsweek'' article, parts of which were subsequently retracted, alleged that government sources had confirmed that United States personnel at the ] had deliberately damaged a copy of the book by flushing it in a toilet in order to torment the prison's ] captives.
The Newsweek article stated that an official had seen a preliminary copy of an unreleased U.S. government report confirming the deliberate damage. Later on, the magazine retracted this when the (still) unnamed official changed his story.


A Pentagon investigation uncovered at least five cases of Qur'an mishandling by U.S. personnel at the base, but insisted that none of these were acts of ]. The Pentagon's report also accused a prisoner of damaging a copy of the ] by putting it in a toilet. The ''Newsweek'' article stated that an official had seen a preliminary copy of an unreleased U.S. government report confirming the deliberate damage. Later on, the magazine retracted this when the (still) unnamed official changed his story. A ] investigation uncovered at least five cases of Quran mishandling by U.S. personnel at the base, but insisted that none of these were acts of desecration. The Pentagon's report also accused a prisoner of damaging a copy of the ] by putting it in a toilet. In 2007, the ], suing under the ], secured the release of a 2002 FBI report containing a detainee's accusation of ill-treatment, including throwing a Quran into a toilet.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/guantnamo-denounced-as-a-gulag/|title = Guantánamo denounced as a "gulag"|date = 26 May 2005}}</ref><ref name="ACLU">
{{cite news
| url=https://www.aclu.org/torturefoia/search/searchdetail.php?r=2694&q=+%2BKORAN+%2BTOILET| title=Formica Report Annex #195 Sworn Statement of
| publisher=]
| access-date=2007-12-24
}} {{dead link|date=May 2016|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref>
This specific accusation had been made on several occasions by other Guantanamo detainees since 2002; ''Newsweek''{{'s}} initial account of a government report confirming it sparked protests throughout the ] and riots in ], where pre-planned demonstrations turned deadly. A worldwide controversy followed.


The affair turned the spotlight on earlier media reports of such incidents. Accusations of ] as a part of U.S. interrogations at prisons in Afghanistan and ] as well as Guantánamo Bay had been made by a number of sources going back to ]. The ''Newsweek'' affair turned the spotlight on earlier media reports of such incidents. Accusations of Quran desecration as a part of U.S. interrogations at prisons in Afghanistan and ] as well as Guantánamo Bay had been made by a number of sources going back to 2002.


==History== ==History==
There were over a dozen pre-''Newsweek'' reports alleging U.S. Qur'an abuse, including the following: There were over a dozen pre-''Newsweek'' reports in the mainstream media alleging U.S. Quran abuse, including the following:
* Several times in 2002 and in early 2003, the ] reported complaints by detainees at Guantanamo Bay prison of desecration of the Quran by U.S. guards in Guantanamo.<ref name="AlJazeera20050521">

{{cite news
* In August ], according to FBI interrogation records, numerous detainees complained of Qur'an abuse, including one who said that guards had flushed his Qu'ran down the toilet.
* Several times in ] and in early ], the ] reported complaints by detainees at Guantanamo Bay prison of desecration of the Qur'an by U.S. guards in Guantanamo. |url = http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/62102DB1-210D-4FC9-9846-C06FABF4C700.htm
|title = ICRC told US of Quran abuse in 2002
* In ], an Afghan former prisoner told the '']'' that U.S. soldiers tormented him by throwing the Qur'an in the toilet.
|publisher = ]
* The ] reported on ], ] that the former Guantánamo prisoner ] maintained that "American soldiers used to tear up copies of the Koran and throw them in the toilet."
|date = May 21, 2005
* In a book review dated ], ], the '']'' reported that five ] detainees, after their release, claimed that they "had seen other prisoners sexually humiliated, had been hooded, and were forced to watch copies of the Koran being flushed down toilets." (Compare: ])
|access-date = 2007-12-24
* '']'' reported on ], ] that there were complaints concerning guards who had "defaced their copies of the Koran and, in one case, had thrown it in a toilet."
|url-status = dead
* '']'' reported on ], ] that three Guantánamo captives &mdash; Fawzi al Odah, 27, Fouad al Rabiah, 45, and Khalid al Mutairi, 29 &mdash; "separately complained to their lawyer that military police threw their Korans into the toilet."
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20060830182445/http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/62102DB1-210D-4FC9-9846-C06FABF4C700.htm
* ''The Miami Herald'' also reported on ], ] that Guantánamo Base staff insulted ] and "threw Korans into toilets."
|archive-date = August 30, 2006
}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2005/5/19/icrc-told-us-of-quran-abuse-in-2002|title=ICRC told US of Quran abuse in 2002|website=www.aljazeera.com}}</ref>
* In 2003, an Afghan former prisoner told '']'' that U.S. soldiers tormented him by throwing the Quran in the toilet.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A29276-2003Mar25&notFound=true|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110514024216/http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A29276-2003Mar25&notFound=true|url-status=dead|archive-date=May 14, 2011|title=Returning Afghans Talk of Guantanamo (washingtonpost.com)|newspaper = ]|date=May 14, 2011}}</ref><ref name="WashingtonPost20050514">{{cite news
|url = https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/13/AR2005051301377.html
|title = Pentagon Probes Detainee Reports Of Koran Dumping
|pages = A16
|newspaper = The Washington Post
|author = John Mintz
|date = May 14, 2005
|access-date = 2007-12-24
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110514025405/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/13/AR2005051301377.html
|archive-date = 2011-05-14
|url-status = live
}}</ref>
* It was reported on 27 October 2004 that four British former detainees alleged that guards threw Korans into toilets.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.irishtimes.com/news/four-british-guantanamo-detainees-sue-us-1.993506|title=Four British Guantanamo detainees sue US|newspaper=The Irish Times}}</ref>
* The ] reported on December 30, 2004, that the former Guantánamo prisoner ] maintained that "American soldiers used to tear up copies of the Quran and throw them in the toilet."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2005/05/18/desecration-of-koran-had-been-reported-before/7ec74a82-5de2-45d8-8cf3-e043e888e8e0/|title=Desecration of Koran Had Been Reported Before|website=www.washingtonpost.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://archive.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2005/05/27/why_muslims_distrust_the_west/|title=Why Muslims distrust the West - The Boston Globe - Boston.com - Op-ed - News|website=archive.boston.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna7889427|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210414210125/https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna7889427|url-status=dead|archive-date=April 14, 2021|title=Desecration of Koran Had Been Reported Before|website=]|date=18 May 2005 }}</ref>
* In a book review dated January 16, 2005, the '']'' reported that five British detainees, after their release, claimed that they "had seen other prisoners sexually humiliated, had been hooded, and were forced to watch copies of the Koran being flushed down toilets."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-xpm-2005-01-16-0501160601-story.html|title=GUANTANAMO LIKE ABU GHRAIB|first=JOHN FREEMAN; Special to The Courant John Freeman is a writer in New|last=York|website=courant.com|date=16 January 2005 }}</ref>
* '']'' reported on January 20, 2005, that there were complaints concerning guards who had "defaced their copies of the Koran and, in one case, had thrown it in a toilet."<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/nation/10685611.htm|title=Lawyers allege abuse of 12 at Guantanamo|website=www.inquirer.com|access-date=2021-04-14|archive-date=2006-02-19|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060219195310/http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/nation/10685611.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref>
* The '']'' reported on March 6, 2005, that three Guantánamo captives{{spaces}}— Fawzi al Odah, 27, Fouad al Rabiah, 45, and Khalid al Mutairi, 29{{spaces}}— "separately complained to their lawyer that military police threw their Quran into the toilet."<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/americas/guantanamo/article1928582.html| url-status = dead| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20210212045402/https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/americas/guantanamo/article1928582.html| archive-date = 2021-02-12| title = Captives allege religious abuse {{!}} Miami Herald| website = ]}} </ref>
* ''The Miami Herald'' also reported on March 9, 2005, that Guantánamo Base staff insulted ] and "threw Qurans into toilets".


== The ''Newsweek'' report == == The ''Newsweek'' report ==
On ], 2005 '']'' magazine published an article claiming that an unnamed ] official had seen a government report supporting a "previously unreported" charge <ref> Among the previously unreported cases, sources tell NEWSWEEK: interrogators, in an attempt to rattle suspects, flushed a Qur'an down a toilet and led a detainee around with a collar and dog leash. </ref> of ] at ], a U.S. military detention facility in Guantánamo Bay. The prospect that U.S. personnel may have deliberately defaced the ] provoked massive anti-U.S. demonstrations throughout the Islamic world, with at least 17 deaths during riots in ]. On April 30, 2005, '']'' magazine published an article claiming that an unnamed United States official had seen a government report supporting a "previously unreported" charge. Among the previously unreported cases that sources reportedly told ''Newsweek'': interrogators, in an attempt to rattle suspects, flushed a Quran down a toilet and led a detainee around with a collar and dog leash.<ref name="Newsweek20050508gitmo">John Barry and ], {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110126104315/http://www.newsweek.com/2005/05/08/gitmo-southcom-showdown.html |date=2011-01-26 }}, ''Newsweek'', May 9, 2005</ref> The prospect that U.S. personnel may have deliberately defaced the Quran provoked massive anti-U.S. demonstrations throughout the Islamic world, with at least 17 deaths during riots in ].


The ''Newsweek'' article, by reporter ], was one of over a dozen such reports of similar incidents that had surfaced in prior months in the U.S. and ] media, but the first involving a U.S. government source acknowledging an inquiry into the event. The Isikoff article was later retracted by ''Newsweek,'' which nonetheless defended both its reporter and the story, stating "neither we nor the Pentagon had any idea it would lead to deadly riots." The case turned the spotlight on other reports of desecration of the Qur'an at Guantánamo. The ''Newsweek'' article, by reporter ], was one of over a dozen such reports of similar incidents that had surfaced in prior months in the U.S. and UK media, but the first involving a U.S. government source acknowledging an inquiry into the event. The Isikoff article was later retracted by ''Newsweek'', which nonetheless defended both its reporter and the story, stating "neither we nor the Pentagon had any idea it would lead to deadly riots." The case turned the spotlight on other reports of desecration of the Quran at Guantánamo.


The article went largely unnoticed for five days. On ], a popular member of the ] ], ], held a press conference. Khan, who is a sharp critic of both Islamist terrorism and of Pakistani President ], criticized his country's government, saying, "This war on terrorism is self-defeating if, on the one hand, you are demanding that we help them and on the other hand, they are desecrating the book on which our entire faith is based." Khan's press conference was rebroadcast throughout the Muslim world. The article went largely unnoticed for five days. On May 6, Pakistani politician, ], held a press conference. Khan criticized his country's government, saying, "This war on terrorism is self-defeating if, on the one hand, you are demanding that we help them and on the other hand, they are desecrating the book on which our entire faith is based." Khan's press conference was rebroadcast throughout the Muslim world.


The ''Newsweek'' report cited an anonymous source, said to be a senior government official, who claimed to have seen a confidential investigative report documenting the alleged incident &mdash; in which interrogators, "in an attempt to rattle suspects, reportedly flushed a Qur'an down a toilet." However, on ], ''Newsweek'' retracted the statement that the abuse had been uncovered by an "internal military investigation." after the source of the story was later unable to confirm where he had seen the information. In its ] issue, ''Newsweek'' stated that: The ''Newsweek'' report cited an anonymous source, said to be a senior government official, who claimed to have seen a confidential investigative report documenting the alleged incident{{spaces}}— in which interrogators, "in an attempt to rattle suspects, reportedly flushed a Quran down a toilet." However, on May 16, ''Newsweek'' retracted the statement that the abuse had been uncovered by an "internal military investigation." after the source of the story was later unable to confirm where he had seen the information. In its May 23 issue, ''Newsweek'' stated that


: ''Our original source later said he couldn't be certain about reading of the alleged Qur'an incident in the report we cited, and said it might have been in other investigative documents or drafts. Top administration officials have promised to continue looking into the charges, and so will we. But we regret that we got any part of our story wrong, and extend our sympathies to victims of the violence and to the U.S. soldiers caught in its midst.'' {{blockquote|Our original source later said he couldn't be certain about reading of the alleged Quran incident in the report we cited, and said it might have been in other investigative documents or drafts. Top administration officials have promised to continue looking into the charges, and so will we. But we regret that we got any part of our story wrong, and extend our sympathies to victims of the violence and to the U.S. soldiers caught in its midst.}}


The '']'' quoted Isikoff as saying: '']'' quoted Isikoff as saying:


: ''Neither ''Newsweek'' nor the Pentagon foresaw that a reference to the desecration of the Koran was going to create the kind of response that it did. The Pentagon saw the item before it ran, and then they didn't move us off it for 11 days afterward. They were as caught off guard by the furor as we were. We obviously blame ourselves for not understanding the potential ramifications.'' {{blockquote|Neither ''Newsweek'' nor the Pentagon foresaw that a reference to the desecration of the Quran was going to create the kind of response that it did. The Pentagon saw the item before it ran, and then they didn't move us off it for 11 days afterward. They were as caught off guard by the furor as we were. We obviously blame ourselves for not understanding the potential ramifications.}}


==International reaction==
<!--<nowiki>
See http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how
to generate footnotes using the <ref> and </ref> tags, and the template below
</nowiki>-->
{{FootnotesSmall|resize={{{1|100%}}}}}


On May 10 and continuing the following week, many anti-American protests took place. In ], demonstrations that began in the eastern provinces and spread to ] were reported to have caused at least seventeen deaths. The ], as a precautionary measure, withdrew all its foreign staff from ], where two of its guest houses were attacked, government buildings and shops were targeted, and the offices of two international aid groups were destroyed. Demonstrations also took place in ], ], ], Pakistan and ], leading to the death of at least 15 people.<ref name="Bbc29959512">{{cite news
==International reaction ==
|url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4539477.stm
]
|title = Afghan anti-US violence escalates
On ] and continuing the following week, many anti-American protests took place, and in some areas these turned into violent riots. In ], demonstrations that began in the eastern provinces and spread to ] were reported to have caused at least seventeen deaths. The ], as a precautionary measure, withdrew all its foreign staff from ], where two of its guest houses were attacked, government buildings and shops were targeted, and the offices of two international aid groups were destroyed. Demonstrations also took place in ], ], ], Pakistan and ], leading to the death of at least 15 people.
|publisher = BBC
|date = 12 May 2005
|access-date = 2007-12-24
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20060221103709/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4539477.stm
|archive-date = 2006-02-21
|url-status = live
}}</ref><ref name="BBC20050514">{{cite news
|url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4547413.stm
|title = Karzai condemns anti-US protests
|publisher = BBC
|date = 14 May 2005
|access-date = 2007-12-24
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20081217074631/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4547413.stm
|archive-date = 2008-12-17
|url-status = live
}}</ref>


White House press secretary ] said, "The report had real consequences, people have lost their lives. Our image abroad has been damaged." However, in a press release issued by the ] on ], General ] claimed that the ''Newsweek'' story was not a chief cause of the riots: "He has been told that the Jalalabad, Afghanistan, rioting was related more to the ongoing political reconciliation process in Afghanistan than anything else." White House press secretary ] said, "The report had real consequences, people have lost their lives. Our image abroad has been damaged." However, in a press release issued by the ] on May 12, General ] claimed that the ''Newsweek'' story was not a chief cause of the riots: "He has been told that the Jalalabad, Afghanistan, rioting was related more to the ongoing political reconciliation process in Afghanistan than anything else."<ref name="StateDeptDenials">
{{cite web
|url = http://usinfo.state.gov/usinfo/Archive/2005/May/12-273892.html?chanlid=washfile
|title = Afghan Riots Not Tied to Report on Quran Handling, General Says: Army investigating allegations of mishandling at Guantanamo Bay facility
|publisher = ]
|author = Jacquelyn S. Porth
|date = 12 May 2005
|access-date = 2007-12-24
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20071117035438/http://usinfo.state.gov/usinfo/Archive/2005/May/12-273892.html?chanlid=washfile
|archive-date = 17 November 2007
|url-status = dead
}}</ref>


On ], thousands of demonstrators gathered in what the ''] ''referred to as "waves of protest" in Pakistan, Egypt, Indonesia, Bangladesh, and the Middle East, "mostly centered on Friday prayer gatherings." The ''Times'' reported that U.S. flags were burned at some demonstrations, and that, although most of the protests were peaceful, overt calls for an "Islamic revolution" were loudly supported by the crowds in Pakistan, further complicating a difficult political situation for General Musharraf. On May 27, thousands of demonstrators gathered in what ''The New York Times'' referred to as "waves of protest" in Pakistan, Egypt, Indonesia, Bangladesh, and the Middle East, "mostly centered on Friday prayer gatherings". The ''New York Times'' reported that U.S. flags were burned at some demonstrations, and that, although most of the protests were peaceful, overt calls for an "Islamic revolution" were loudly supported by the crowds in Pakistan, further complicating a difficult political situation for General Musharraf.


A ] spokesperson Simon Schorno confirmed that U.S. personnel at ] had displayed "disrespect" to the Qur'an, and that U.S. officials knew of this activity. Delegates from the International Committee of the Red Cross informed U.S. authorities, who took action to stop the alleged abuse, said Schorno. He declined to specify the nature of the incidents. A ] spokesperson Simon Schorno confirmed that U.S. personnel at ]{{Citation needed|date=April 2008}} had displayed "disrespect" to the Quran, and that U.S. officials knew of this activity. Delegates from the International Committee of the Red Cross informed U.S. authorities, who took action to stop the alleged abuse, said Schorno. He declined to specify the nature of the incidents.


::"We're basically referring in general terms to disrespect of the Qur'an, and that's where we leave it," Schorno told The Associated Press. "We believe that since, U.S. authorities have taken the corrective measures that we required in our interventions." , {{blockquote|"We're basically referring in general terms to disrespect of the Quran, and that's where we leave it", Schorno told The Associated Press. "We believe that since, U.S. authorities have taken the corrective measures that we required in our interventions."<ref name="LATimes20050522">{{cite news
|url = https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/842922491.html?dids=842922491:842922491&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=May+22%2C+2005&author=Richard+A.+Serrano+and+John+Daniszewski&pub=Los+Angeles+Times&edition=&startpage=A.1&desc=Dozens+Have+Alleged+Koran%27s+Mishandling
|title = Dozens Have Alleged Koran's Mishandling
|pages = A.1
|work = ]
|author = Richard A. Serrano, John Daniszewski
|date = May 22, 2005
|access-date = 2007-12-24
|url-access=subscription
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070930235831/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/842922491.html?dids=842922491:842922491&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=May+22,+2005&author=Richard+A.+Serrano+and+John+Daniszewski&pub=Los+Angeles+Times&edition=&startpage=A.1&desc=Dozens+Have+Alleged+Koran's+Mishandling
|archive-date = 2007-09-30
|url-status = dead
}}</ref><ref name="BBC20050519">{{cite news
|url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4564405.stm
|title = Red Cross 'raised Koran concerns'
|publisher = BBC
|date = 19 May 2005
|access-date = 2007-12-24
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080227003742/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4564405.stm
|archive-date = 2008-02-27
|url-status = live
}}</ref>}}


], who participated in the ], may have had his ideology reinforced by allegations of Qur'an abuse. His cousin Mohammad Saleem noted that "Incidents like desecration of the Koran have always been in his mind." The cousin of ], who participated in the ], claimed that Tanweer's ideology was reinforced by allegations of Quran abuse, "incidents like desecration of the Koran" had "always been in his mind."<ref name="TheTimes20050722">{{cite news
|url = http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,22989-1704235,00.html
|title = Cousin listened to boasts about suicide mission
|work = ]
|author = Daniel McGrory, Zahid Hussain
|date = July 22, 2005
|access-date = 2007-12-24
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080808140205/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,22989-1704235,00.html
|archive-date = 2008-08-08
|url-status = dead
}}</ref>


==Other news reports== ==Other news reports==
]
<!-- these 2 bullets should be merged with the "dozens" of pre-Newsweek reports. -->
* The ''New York Times'' reported on ], ] that " said ... a protest of guards' handling of copies of the Koran, which had been tossed into a pile and stepped on, a senior officer delivered an apology over the camp's loudspeaker system, pledging that such abuses would stop."
*Former Guantánamo Bay detainee Moazzam Begg gave an interview in June ] in which he claimed to have witnessed "incidents that provoked fury, including the placing of Qur’ans in an area used as a latrine."


<!-- these two bullets should be merged with the "dozens" of pre-''Newsweek'' reports. -->
==US military findings==
* ''The New York Times'' reported on May 1, 2005 that " said ... a protest of guards' handling of copies of the Quran, which had been tossed into a pile and stepped on, a senior officer delivered an apology over the camp's loudspeaker system, pledging that such abuses would stop."
On ], ], a U.S. military investigation by the base commander, Brigadier General Jay Hood , reported four (possibly five) incidents of "mishandling" of the Qur'an by U.S. personnel at Guantánamo Bay. Hood said his investigation "revealed a consistent, documented policy of respectful handling of the Qur'an dating back almost two and a half years."
* Former Guantánamo Bay detainee ] gave an interview in 2005 in which he claimed to have witnessed "incidents that provoked fury, including the placing of Qurans in an area used as a latrine."<ref>{{cite web|title=British ex-detainees back claims US interrogators abused Koran|work=The Birmingham Post|date=May 17, 2005|url=https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-132495778.html|quote=But in his testimony to Islamic human rights website Cageprisoners.com, Mr Begg said it was 'widely known' that a US Marine had torn up a copy of the Koran in Kandahar. He adds: 'In Bagram, that same year (2002), I saw incidents that provoked fury, including the placing of Qurans (Korans) in an area used as a latrine.|publisher=|access-date=2016-05-04|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171204061226/https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-132495778.html|archive-date=December 4, 2017|url-status=dead|df=mdy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Britons Allege They Saw US Guards Desecrate Quran|url=http://old.cageprisoners.com/articles.php?id=7312|publisher=Cage Prisoners|date=May 17, 2005|access-date=2016-05-04|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170326051615/http://old.cageprisoners.com/articles.php?id=7312|archive-date=2017-03-26|url-status=dead}}</ref>
* Six former Guantánamo detainees told the ] that they had seen Koran desecration while in custody at the facility. Two of them claimed to have been abused by having their interrogators throw Korans into buckets of urine. Another claimed that during his interrogation a US soldier threw his Koran in "a bucket of feces".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/more-detainees-claim-quran-abuse/|title=More Detainees Claim Quran Abuse|website=www.cbsnews.com|date=28 June 2005 }}</ref>
* Multiple detainees claimed to have seen guards urinating on the Koran as well as seeing them tear it up and throw pages into dirty water.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2005-may-22-fg-koran22-story.html|title=Dozens Have Alleged Koran's Mishandling|date=May 22, 2005|website=Los Angeles Times}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.theage.com.au/world/iraqi-afghan-detainees-claim-koran-abuse-20050524-ge07z6.html|title=Iraqi, Afghan detainees claim Koran abuse|date=May 24, 2005|website=The Age}}</ref>


==U.S. military findings==
CBC News reported:
On June 3, 2005, a U.S. military investigation by the base commander, Brigadier General Jay Hood, reported four (possibly five) incidents of "mishandling" of the Quran by U.S. personnel at Guantánamo Bay. Hood said his investigation "revealed a consistent, documented policy of respectful handling of the Quran dating back almost two and a half years."<ref name="VoaNews20050603a">
:"The U.S. Pentagon confirmed Friday a list of abuses involving the Qur'an, Islam's holy book, by American personnel at Guantanamo Bay, but said the incidents were relatively minor."
{{cite news
| url=http://www.voanews.com/mediaassets/english/2005_06/Other/pdf/PR050603a.pdf
| title=Koran Inquiry: Description of Incidents
| publisher=]
| author=Jay Hood
| author-link=Jay Hood
| date=June 3, 2005
| access-date=2007-12-24
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080530003544/http://www.voanews.com/mediaassets/english/2005_06/Other/pdf/PR050603a.pdf |archive-date = 2008-05-30}}</ref>

] reported:
{{blockquote|The U.S. Pentagon confirmed Friday a list of abuses involving the Qur'an, Islam's holy book, by American personnel at Guantanamo Bay, but said the incidents were relatively minor.<ref name="Cbc20050604">{{cite news
|url = https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/u-s-admits-abuses-to-qur-an-in-guantanamo-1.537573
|title = U.S. admits abuses to Quran in Guantanamo
|publisher = ]
|date = June 4, 2005
|access-date = 2007-12-24
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070820113849/https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/u-s-admits-abuses-to-qur-an-in-guantanamo-1.537573
|archive-date = 2007-08-20
|url-status = live
}}</ref>}}


According to the Hood report: According to the Hood report:
*a soldier intentionally kicked a Qur'an; * a soldier intentionally kicked a Quran;
*an interrogator intentionally stepped on a Qur'an; * an interrogator intentionally stepped on a Quran;
*a guard's urine came through an air vent, unintentionally splashing a detainee and his Qur'an; * a guard's urine came through an air vent, unintentionally splashing a detainee and his Quran;
*water balloons thrown by prison guards at one another unintentionally caused a number of Qur'ans to get wet; and * water balloons thrown by prison guards at one another unintentionally caused a number of Qurans to get wet; and
*a two-word obscenity was written in English on the inside cover of a Qur'an (whether US personnel were responsible for this act, however, could not be confirmed). * a two-word obscenity was written in English on the inside cover of a Quran (whether US personnel were responsible for this act, however, could not be confirmed).
The report laid out the circumstances of these incidents and disciplinary actions taken. It also stressed that such mishandling was rare, and that guards were usually respectful of the Qur'an, following strict regulations the military laid down for handling the Qur'an. (The Qur'an handling policy was codified in a policy letter in January 2003 in response to reports by the Red Cross of Quran abuse.) The report laid out the circumstances of these incidents and disciplinary actions taken. It also stressed that such mishandling was rare, and that guards were usually respectful of the Quran, following strict regulations the military laid down for handling the Quran.<ref name="VoaNews20050603b">
{{cite news
| url=http://www.voanews.com/mediaassets/english/2005_06/Other/pdf/PR050603-b.pdf
| title=Excerpts from Joint Task Force Guantanamo Headquarters, Detention Operations Group Standard Operating Procedures
| publisher=]
| author=Jay Hood
| author-link=Jay Hood
| date=February 1, 2005
| access-date=2007-12-24
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080530003553/http://www.voanews.com/mediaassets/english/2005_06/Other/pdf/PR050603-b.pdf |archive-date = 2008-05-30}}</ref>
(The Quran handling policy was codified in a policy letter in January 2003 in response to reports by the Red Cross of Quran abuse.<ref name="VoaNews20050603Complete">
{{cite news
| url=http://www.voanews.com/mediaassets/english/2005_06/Other/pdf/PR050603.pdf
| title=HOOD COMPLETES KORAN INQUIRY
| publisher=]
| author=Jay Hood
| author-link=Jay Hood
| date=June 3, 2005
| access-date=2007-12-24
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080530003534/http://www.voanews.com/mediaassets/english/2005_06/Other/pdf/PR050603.pdf |archive-date = 2008-05-30}}</ref>)


The Hood report also listed 15 reported incidents of detainees mishandling their own copies of the Qur'an, including complaints made by other detainees. The Hood report also listed 15 reported incidents of detainees mishandling their own copies of the Quran, including complaints made by other detainees.
One of these cases involved a prisoner "attempting to flush a Qur'an down the toilet and urinating on the Qur'an." One of these cases involved a prisoner "attempting to flush a Quran down the toilet and urinating on the Quran."


The statement did not provide any explanation about why the detainees might have abused their own holy books. The statement did not provide any explanation about why the detainees might have abused their own holy books.<ref name=Cbc20050604/>


==FBI documents and other reports==
Before the release of this report, the U.S. government had denied many claims of Qu'ran abuse, including the multiple allegations by released detainees that Qur'ans had been placed in toilets. The Hood report and accompanying statements continue to deny any verified instances of U.S. personnel placing the Qur'an in toilets at Guantanamo Bay. The denials, however, remain controversial.
The ''Newsweek'' article and the ensuing controversy turned the spotlight on other reports of Quran desecration and spurred additional investigations by others. After a verdict by a federal court on May 25, 2005, the ] (ACLU) obtained documents from the ] interrogations of Guantánamo Bay detainees dating back to August 2002. The documents stated that some detainees had claimed to have witnessed Quran desecration (including "flush a Quran in the toilet"), among other acts, on many occasions by their guards — in a document dated August 1, 2002. The pertinent excerpt reads as follows:


{{blockquote|rior to his capture, had no information against the United States. Personally, he has nothing against the United States. The guards in the detention facility do not treat him well. Their behavior is bad. About five months ago, the guards beat the detainees. They flushed a Koran in the toilet. The guards dance around when the detainees are trying to pray. The guards still do these things.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4581383.stm|title=FBI records detail Koran claims|date=May 26, 2005|via=news.bbc.co.uk}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.sbs.com.au/news/fbi-cites-koran-abuse|title=FBI cites Koran abuse|website=SBS News|access-date=2021-04-14|archive-date=2021-04-14|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210414183420/https://www.sbs.com.au/news/fbi-cites-koran-abuse|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2005-may-26-na-gitmo26-story.html|title=Detainees Told FBI of Koran Desecration|date=May 26, 2005|website=Los Angeles Times}}</ref><ref name="AcluFbiSecret">
==Independent findings==
{{cite news
| url=https://www.aclu.org/projects/foiasearch/pdf/DOJFBI003232.pdf
| title=Investigation on redacted
| publisher=]
| author=redacted
| date=August 2, 2002
| access-date=2007-12-19
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070929130547/http://www.aclu.org/projects/foiasearch/pdf/DOJFBI003232.pdf |archive-date = 2007-09-29}}</ref>}}


The ruling of the court forcing the release of this and other documents came under the ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://news.trust.org//humanitarian/|title=Humanitarian &#124; Thomson Reuters Foundation News|website=news.trust.org}}</ref>
The recent book ] by ] and ] supports the claim of the Qur'an being placed in toilets at Guantanamo and describes many other abuses faced by the prisoners there. Saar is a former U.S. soldier who worked as a translator at Guantanamo Bay; his book reports such situations as a female interrogator taunting the prisoner sexually and wiping what seemed to be menstrual blood on the detainee. (It appears to have been ink; Saar reports that the prisoner was unable to clean himself and hence unable to pray.) Accounts of beatings by the ] (initial reaction force) have also been reported in Saar's book. An from December 2003, six months after Saar left Guantanamo, said that Defense Department interrogators at Guantanamo had impersonated FBI agents while using "torture techniques" on a detainee.


The ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero said, in a news release, that "The United States government continues to ] to mounting evidence of widespread abuse of detainees held in its custody."
==FBI documents and other reports==
The ''Newsweek'' article and the ensuing controversy turned the spotlight on other reports of Qu'ran desecration and spurred additional investigations by others. After a verdict by a federal court on ], ], the ] (ACLU) obtained documents from the ] interrogations of ] detainees dating back to August ]. The documents stated that some detainees had claimed to have witnessed Qur'an desecration (including "flush a Koran in the toilet"), among other acts, on many occasions by their guards &mdash; in a document dated ], ].


The FBI declared that it could not investigate the matter, as it was up to the Defense Department to do so. For its part, the Pentagon, through its spokesman Lawrence Di Rita, appeared to have transitioned from flat denials to vagueness and unsettled syntax: "There have been instances, and we'll have more to say about it as we learn more, but where a Quran may have fallen to the floor in the course of searching a cell." Scott McClellan, the White House press secretary, told reporters that "past accusations have had credibility issues."
The ruling of the court came under the ]


James Jaffer, an attorney working for the ACLU, was quoted by the ''New York Times'' as stating that errors in the ''Newsweek'' story had been used to discredit other investigative efforts conducted by his organization and other groups "that were not based on anonymous sources, but government documents, reports written by FBI agents."
The ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero said, in a news release, that "The United States government continues to ] to mounting evidence of widespread abuse of detainees held in its custody."


Many questioned the veracity of such accounts, noting that the FBI, in 2004, had released a captured Al-Qaeda training manual<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.usdoj.gov/ag/trainingmanual.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050331091340/http://www.usdoj.gov/ag/trainingmanual.htm|url-status=dead|archive-date=March 31, 2005|title=Al Qaeda Training Manual|date=March 31, 2005}}</ref> which ] ] spokesmen claimed shows that Al-Qaeda members are trained to make false accusations once captured.
The FBI declared that it could not investigate the matter, as it was up to the Defense Department to do so. For its part, the Pentagon, through its spokesman Lawrence Di Rita, appeared to have transitioned from flat denials to vagueness and unsettled syntax: "There have been instances, and we'll have more to say about it as we learn more, but where a Qur'an may have fallen to the floor in the course of searching a cell." Scott McClellan, the White House press secretary, told reporters that "past accusations have had credibility issues."
<!--
Actually, the manual tells readers to seek a medical examination prior to capture, to provide a "before" picture. Arguably, this is the exact opposite of what they should do if they were going to lie about torture. This document was written prior to 9-11, when if potential readers of the manual were captured they would be captured by countries known to make routine use of torture.


IMO, Bush Presidency spin-doctors are deliberately misinterpreting this document, trusting that readers won't bother to download it and read it for themselves.
James Jaffer, an attorney working for the ACLU, was quoted by the ''New York Times'' as stating that errors in the ''Newsweek'' story had been used to discredit other investigative efforts conducted by his organization and other groups "that were not based on anonymous sources, but government documents, reports written by FBI agents."


IMO, the manual is not instructing it readers to lie about torture. Rather, the manual assumes its readers will face torture.
Many questioned the veracity of such accounts, noting that the FBI, in 2004, had released a indicating that Al-Qaeda members are trained to make false accusations once captured. However, most of the accusations of Qur'an "toilet" desecrations now on the public record have been made by former detainees who were released by the U.S. government after being held without trial, and thus would seem to be low-probability candidates for al-Qaeda membership.
-->


==The SERE connection== ==The SERE connection==


Several reports have alleged a connection between events at Guantanamo Bay and a ]-funded program known as ], which stands for "Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape." Several reports have alleged a connection between events at Guantanamo Bay and a Department of Defense program "]" (SERE).


On May 16, 2005, ] published an email from a former SERE attendee who reported abuse of the Christian holy book in training. The emailer had no direct knowledge of operations at Guantanamo, but noted that this tactic sounded similar to that alleged in the Newsweek story. On May 16, 2005, ] published an email from a former SERE attendee who reported abuse of the Christian holy book in training.<ref name="JuanCole">
{{cite news
| url=http://www.juancole.com/2005/05/guantanamo-controversies-bible-and.html
| title=Guantanamo Controversies: The Bible and the Koran
| author=Juan Cole
| author-link=Juan Cole
| date= May 16, 2005
| access-date=2007-12-19
| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20071109161328/http://www.juancole.com/2005/05/guantanamo-controversies-bible-and.html| archive-date= 9 November 2007 | url-status= live}}</ref>
The emailer had no direct knowledge of operations at Guantanamo, but noted that this tactic sounded similar to that alleged in the Newsweek story.


In July 2005, an article in ] magazine suggested that the SERE program involved a number of techniques which paralleled those allegedly used at Guantanamo Bay, including the desecration of religious texts. The writer contacted Juan Cole's anonymous source who said that in 1999 he attended a Navy SERE program in California. In July 2005, an article in '']'' magazine suggested that the SERE program involved a number of techniques which paralleled those allegedly used at Guantánamo Bay, including the desecration of religious texts. The writer contacted Juan Cole's anonymous source who said that in 1999 he attended a Navy SERE program in California.<ref>{{cite magazine|last=Mayer|first=Jane|title=In Gitmo|url=https://www.newyorker.com/online/content/articles/050711on_onlineonly01|magazine=The New Yorker|date=July 6, 2005|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050709021535/http://www.newyorker.com/online/content/articles/050711on_onlineonly01|archive-date=July 9, 2005|url-status=dead}}</ref>


:So the ] trashing happened when this guy had us all in the courtyard sitting for one of his speeches. They were tempting us with a big pot of soup that was boiling - we were all starving from a few days of chow deprivation. He brought out the Bible and started going off on it verbally - how it was worthless, we were forsaken by God, etc. Then he threw it on the ground and kicked it around. It was definitely the climax of his speech. Then he kicked over the soup pot and threw us back in the cells. {{blockquote|So, the ] trashing happened when this guy had us all in the courtyard sitting for one of his speeches. They were tempting us with a big pot of soup that was boiling{{spaces}}– we were all starving from a few days of chow deprivation. He brought out the Bible and started going off on it verbally{{spaces}}– how it was worthless, we were forsaken by God, etc. Then he threw it on the ground and kicked it around. It was definitely the climax of his speech. Then he kicked over the soup pot and threw us back in the cells.}}


The SERE program's chief psychologist, Col. Morgan Banks, issued guidance in early 2003 for "behavioral science consultants" who helped to devise Guantánamo's interrogation strategy -- although Banks has emphatically denied that he advocated the use of SERE counter-resistance techniques to break down detainees. However, General ], chief of the U.S. Southern Command, confirmed that a team from Guantanamo went "up to our SERE school and developed a list of techniques" for "high-profile, high-value" detainees. According to an ] in the November 14 2005 '']'' by M. Gregg Bloche and Jonathan H. Marks, two lawyers with no first-hand knowledge of SERE, "General Hill had sent this list -- which included prolonged isolation and sleep deprivation, stress positions, physical assault and the exploitation of detainees' phobias -- to Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, who approved most of the tactics in December 2002. Some within the Pentagon warned that these tactics constituted torture, but a top adviser to Secretary Rumsfeld justified them by pointing to their use in SERE training, a senior Pentagon official told us last month." Their column failed to mention that the tactics in dispute ]. The SERE program's chief psychologist, Col. Morgan Banks, issued guidance in early 2003 for "behavioral science consultants" who helped to devise Guantánamo's interrogation strategy—although Banks has emphatically denied that he advocated the use of SERE counter-resistance techniques to break down detainees. However, General ], chief of the U.S. Southern Command, confirmed that a team from Guantanamo went "up to our SERE school and developed a list of techniques" for "high-profile, high-value" detainees. According to an ] in the November 14, 2005 ''The New York Times'' by ] and Jonathan H. Marks, two lawyers with no first-hand knowledge of SERE, "General Hill had sent this list{{spaces}}– which included prolonged isolation and sleep deprivation, stress positions, physical assault and the exploitation of detainees' phobias{{spaces}}– to Secretary of Defense ], who approved most of the tactics in December 2002. Some within the Pentagon warned that these tactics constituted torture, but a top adviser to Secretary Rumsfeld justified them by pointing to their use in SERE training, a senior Pentagon official told us last month."<ref name="Nytimes20051114">{{cite news
|url = https://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/14/opinion/14blochemarks.html
|title = Doing Unto Others as They Did Unto Us
|work = The New York Times
|author = Gregg Bloche, Jonathon H. Marks
|date = November 14, 2005
|access-date = 2007-12-19
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110505213857/http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/14/opinion/14blochemarks.html
|archive-date = 2011-05-05
|url-status = live
}}</ref>


==See also== ==See also== <!-- please respect alphabetical order -->
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] (2006) * ]
* ]
* ]
* ]

==References==
{{Reflist}}


==External links== ==External links==
* &ndash; original ], ] ''Newsweek'' story * original May 9, 2005 ''Newsweek'' story
* *
* —searchable ACLU archive of documents released under court order via the Freedom of Information Act, featuring recently declassified documents about reported Guantanamo Quran desecration
* &ndash; ''Newsweek's'' ], ] apology
* – ''Newsweek's'' May 23, 2005 apology
* *
* *
* *
* *
* commentary by ] * {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121014205245/http://townhall.com/columnists/charleskrauthammer/2005/06/03/gitmo_grovel_enough_already |date=2012-10-14 }} commentary by ]
* *
* New Yorker article about SERE techniques at Guantanamo Bay * ''New Yorker'' article about SERE techniques at Guantanamo Bay
*

{{Controversies surrounding people captured during the War on Terror}}
]


{{DEFAULTSORT:Quran desecration controversy}}
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 17:52, 1 December 2024

2005 Islam-related controversy
Part of a series on
Islamophobia
No mosque
Issues
Status by country
ExamplesAttacks on mosques:

Genocide:

Massacres, torture, expulsion:

Other incidents:

Media
Opposition

The 2005 Quran desecration controversy began when Newsweek's April 30, 2005, issue contained a report asserting that United States prison guards or interrogators had deliberately damaged a copy of the Quran. A week later, The New Yorker reported the words of Pakistani politician Imran Khan: "This is what the U.S. is doing—desecrating the Quran." This incident caused violent unrest in some parts of the Muslim world.

The Newsweek article, parts of which were subsequently retracted, alleged that government sources had confirmed that United States personnel at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp had deliberately damaged a copy of the book by flushing it in a toilet in order to torment the prison's Muslim captives.

The Newsweek article stated that an official had seen a preliminary copy of an unreleased U.S. government report confirming the deliberate damage. Later on, the magazine retracted this when the (still) unnamed official changed his story. A Pentagon investigation uncovered at least five cases of Quran mishandling by U.S. personnel at the base, but insisted that none of these were acts of desecration. The Pentagon's report also accused a prisoner of damaging a copy of the Quran by putting it in a toilet. In 2007, the American Civil Liberties Union, suing under the Freedom of Information Act, secured the release of a 2002 FBI report containing a detainee's accusation of ill-treatment, including throwing a Quran into a toilet. This specific accusation had been made on several occasions by other Guantanamo detainees since 2002; Newsweek's initial account of a government report confirming it sparked protests throughout the Islamic world and riots in Afghanistan, where pre-planned demonstrations turned deadly. A worldwide controversy followed.

The Newsweek affair turned the spotlight on earlier media reports of such incidents. Accusations of Quran desecration as a part of U.S. interrogations at prisons in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as Guantánamo Bay had been made by a number of sources going back to 2002.

History

There were over a dozen pre-Newsweek reports in the mainstream media alleging U.S. Quran abuse, including the following:

  • Several times in 2002 and in early 2003, the International Committee of the Red Cross reported complaints by detainees at Guantanamo Bay prison of desecration of the Quran by U.S. guards in Guantanamo.
  • In 2003, an Afghan former prisoner told The Washington Post that U.S. soldiers tormented him by throwing the Quran in the toilet.
  • It was reported on 27 October 2004 that four British former detainees alleged that guards threw Korans into toilets.
  • The BBC reported on December 30, 2004, that the former Guantánamo prisoner Abdullah Tabarak Ahmad maintained that "American soldiers used to tear up copies of the Quran and throw them in the toilet."
  • In a book review dated January 16, 2005, the Hartford Courant reported that five British detainees, after their release, claimed that they "had seen other prisoners sexually humiliated, had been hooded, and were forced to watch copies of the Koran being flushed down toilets."
  • The Philadelphia Inquirer reported on January 20, 2005, that there were complaints concerning guards who had "defaced their copies of the Koran and, in one case, had thrown it in a toilet."
  • The Miami Herald reported on March 6, 2005, that three Guantánamo captives — Fawzi al Odah, 27, Fouad al Rabiah, 45, and Khalid al Mutairi, 29 — "separately complained to their lawyer that military police threw their Quran into the toilet."
  • The Miami Herald also reported on March 9, 2005, that Guantánamo Base staff insulted Allah and "threw Qurans into toilets".

The Newsweek report

On April 30, 2005, Newsweek magazine published an article claiming that an unnamed United States official had seen a government report supporting a "previously unreported" charge. Among the previously unreported cases that sources reportedly told Newsweek: interrogators, in an attempt to rattle suspects, flushed a Quran down a toilet and led a detainee around with a collar and dog leash. The prospect that U.S. personnel may have deliberately defaced the Quran provoked massive anti-U.S. demonstrations throughout the Islamic world, with at least 17 deaths during riots in Afghanistan.

The Newsweek article, by reporter Michael Isikoff, was one of over a dozen such reports of similar incidents that had surfaced in prior months in the U.S. and UK media, but the first involving a U.S. government source acknowledging an inquiry into the event. The Isikoff article was later retracted by Newsweek, which nonetheless defended both its reporter and the story, stating "neither we nor the Pentagon had any idea it would lead to deadly riots." The case turned the spotlight on other reports of desecration of the Quran at Guantánamo.

The article went largely unnoticed for five days. On May 6, Pakistani politician, Imran Khan, held a press conference. Khan criticized his country's government, saying, "This war on terrorism is self-defeating if, on the one hand, you are demanding that we help them and on the other hand, they are desecrating the book on which our entire faith is based." Khan's press conference was rebroadcast throughout the Muslim world.

The Newsweek report cited an anonymous source, said to be a senior government official, who claimed to have seen a confidential investigative report documenting the alleged incident — in which interrogators, "in an attempt to rattle suspects, reportedly flushed a Quran down a toilet." However, on May 16, Newsweek retracted the statement that the abuse had been uncovered by an "internal military investigation." after the source of the story was later unable to confirm where he had seen the information. In its May 23 issue, Newsweek stated that

Our original source later said he couldn't be certain about reading of the alleged Quran incident in the report we cited, and said it might have been in other investigative documents or drafts. Top administration officials have promised to continue looking into the charges, and so will we. But we regret that we got any part of our story wrong, and extend our sympathies to victims of the violence and to the U.S. soldiers caught in its midst.

The New York Times quoted Isikoff as saying:

Neither Newsweek nor the Pentagon foresaw that a reference to the desecration of the Quran was going to create the kind of response that it did. The Pentagon saw the item before it ran, and then they didn't move us off it for 11 days afterward. They were as caught off guard by the furor as we were. We obviously blame ourselves for not understanding the potential ramifications.

International reaction

On May 10 and continuing the following week, many anti-American protests took place. In Afghanistan, demonstrations that began in the eastern provinces and spread to Kabul were reported to have caused at least seventeen deaths. The United Nations, as a precautionary measure, withdrew all its foreign staff from Jalalabad, where two of its guest houses were attacked, government buildings and shops were targeted, and the offices of two international aid groups were destroyed. Demonstrations also took place in Palestine, Egypt, Sudan, Pakistan and Indonesia, leading to the death of at least 15 people.

White House press secretary Scott McClellan said, "The report had real consequences, people have lost their lives. Our image abroad has been damaged." However, in a press release issued by the United States Department of State on May 12, General Richard Myers claimed that the Newsweek story was not a chief cause of the riots: "He has been told that the Jalalabad, Afghanistan, rioting was related more to the ongoing political reconciliation process in Afghanistan than anything else."

On May 27, thousands of demonstrators gathered in what The New York Times referred to as "waves of protest" in Pakistan, Egypt, Indonesia, Bangladesh, and the Middle East, "mostly centered on Friday prayer gatherings". The New York Times reported that U.S. flags were burned at some demonstrations, and that, although most of the protests were peaceful, overt calls for an "Islamic revolution" were loudly supported by the crowds in Pakistan, further complicating a difficult political situation for General Musharraf.

A Red Cross spokesperson Simon Schorno confirmed that U.S. personnel at Camp X-Ray had displayed "disrespect" to the Quran, and that U.S. officials knew of this activity. Delegates from the International Committee of the Red Cross informed U.S. authorities, who took action to stop the alleged abuse, said Schorno. He declined to specify the nature of the incidents.

"We're basically referring in general terms to disrespect of the Quran, and that's where we leave it", Schorno told The Associated Press. "We believe that since, U.S. authorities have taken the corrective measures that we required in our interventions."

The cousin of Shehzad Tanweer, who participated in the 7 July 2005 London bombings, claimed that Tanweer's ideology was reinforced by allegations of Quran abuse, "incidents like desecration of the Koran" had "always been in his mind."

Other news reports

  • The New York Times reported on May 1, 2005 that " said ... a protest of guards' handling of copies of the Quran, which had been tossed into a pile and stepped on, a senior officer delivered an apology over the camp's loudspeaker system, pledging that such abuses would stop."
  • Former Guantánamo Bay detainee Moazzam Begg gave an interview in 2005 in which he claimed to have witnessed "incidents that provoked fury, including the placing of Qurans in an area used as a latrine."
  • Six former Guantánamo detainees told the Associated Press that they had seen Koran desecration while in custody at the facility. Two of them claimed to have been abused by having their interrogators throw Korans into buckets of urine. Another claimed that during his interrogation a US soldier threw his Koran in "a bucket of feces".
  • Multiple detainees claimed to have seen guards urinating on the Koran as well as seeing them tear it up and throw pages into dirty water.

U.S. military findings

On June 3, 2005, a U.S. military investigation by the base commander, Brigadier General Jay Hood, reported four (possibly five) incidents of "mishandling" of the Quran by U.S. personnel at Guantánamo Bay. Hood said his investigation "revealed a consistent, documented policy of respectful handling of the Quran dating back almost two and a half years."

CBC News reported:

The U.S. Pentagon confirmed Friday a list of abuses involving the Qur'an, Islam's holy book, by American personnel at Guantanamo Bay, but said the incidents were relatively minor.

According to the Hood report:

  • a soldier intentionally kicked a Quran;
  • an interrogator intentionally stepped on a Quran;
  • a guard's urine came through an air vent, unintentionally splashing a detainee and his Quran;
  • water balloons thrown by prison guards at one another unintentionally caused a number of Qurans to get wet; and
  • a two-word obscenity was written in English on the inside cover of a Quran (whether US personnel were responsible for this act, however, could not be confirmed).

The report laid out the circumstances of these incidents and disciplinary actions taken. It also stressed that such mishandling was rare, and that guards were usually respectful of the Quran, following strict regulations the military laid down for handling the Quran. (The Quran handling policy was codified in a policy letter in January 2003 in response to reports by the Red Cross of Quran abuse.)

The Hood report also listed 15 reported incidents of detainees mishandling their own copies of the Quran, including complaints made by other detainees. One of these cases involved a prisoner "attempting to flush a Quran down the toilet and urinating on the Quran."

The statement did not provide any explanation about why the detainees might have abused their own holy books.

FBI documents and other reports

The Newsweek article and the ensuing controversy turned the spotlight on other reports of Quran desecration and spurred additional investigations by others. After a verdict by a federal court on May 25, 2005, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) obtained documents from the FBI interrogations of Guantánamo Bay detainees dating back to August 2002. The documents stated that some detainees had claimed to have witnessed Quran desecration (including "flush a Quran in the toilet"), among other acts, on many occasions by their guards — in a document dated August 1, 2002. The pertinent excerpt reads as follows:

rior to his capture, had no information against the United States. Personally, he has nothing against the United States. The guards in the detention facility do not treat him well. Their behavior is bad. About five months ago, the guards beat the detainees. They flushed a Koran in the toilet. The guards dance around when the detainees are trying to pray. The guards still do these things.

The ruling of the court forcing the release of this and other documents came under the Freedom of Information Act.

The ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero said, in a news release, that "The United States government continues to turn a blind eye to mounting evidence of widespread abuse of detainees held in its custody."

The FBI declared that it could not investigate the matter, as it was up to the Defense Department to do so. For its part, the Pentagon, through its spokesman Lawrence Di Rita, appeared to have transitioned from flat denials to vagueness and unsettled syntax: "There have been instances, and we'll have more to say about it as we learn more, but where a Quran may have fallen to the floor in the course of searching a cell." Scott McClellan, the White House press secretary, told reporters that "past accusations have had credibility issues."

James Jaffer, an attorney working for the ACLU, was quoted by the New York Times as stating that errors in the Newsweek story had been used to discredit other investigative efforts conducted by his organization and other groups "that were not based on anonymous sources, but government documents, reports written by FBI agents."

Many questioned the veracity of such accounts, noting that the FBI, in 2004, had released a captured Al-Qaeda training manual which Bush Presidency spokesmen claimed shows that Al-Qaeda members are trained to make false accusations once captured.

The SERE connection

Several reports have alleged a connection between events at Guantanamo Bay and a Department of Defense program "Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape" (SERE).

On May 16, 2005, Juan Cole published an email from a former SERE attendee who reported abuse of the Christian holy book in training. The emailer had no direct knowledge of operations at Guantanamo, but noted that this tactic sounded similar to that alleged in the Newsweek story.

In July 2005, an article in The New Yorker magazine suggested that the SERE program involved a number of techniques which paralleled those allegedly used at Guantánamo Bay, including the desecration of religious texts. The writer contacted Juan Cole's anonymous source who said that in 1999 he attended a Navy SERE program in California.

So, the Bible trashing happened when this guy had us all in the courtyard sitting for one of his speeches. They were tempting us with a big pot of soup that was boiling – we were all starving from a few days of chow deprivation. He brought out the Bible and started going off on it verbally – how it was worthless, we were forsaken by God, etc. Then he threw it on the ground and kicked it around. It was definitely the climax of his speech. Then he kicked over the soup pot and threw us back in the cells.

The SERE program's chief psychologist, Col. Morgan Banks, issued guidance in early 2003 for "behavioral science consultants" who helped to devise Guantánamo's interrogation strategy—although Banks has emphatically denied that he advocated the use of SERE counter-resistance techniques to break down detainees. However, General James T. Hill, chief of the U.S. Southern Command, confirmed that a team from Guantanamo went "up to our SERE school and developed a list of techniques" for "high-profile, high-value" detainees. According to an op-ed in the November 14, 2005 The New York Times by M. Gregg Bloche and Jonathan H. Marks, two lawyers with no first-hand knowledge of SERE, "General Hill had sent this list – which included prolonged isolation and sleep deprivation, stress positions, physical assault and the exploitation of detainees' phobias – to Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, who approved most of the tactics in December 2002. Some within the Pentagon warned that these tactics constituted torture, but a top adviser to Secretary Rumsfeld justified them by pointing to their use in SERE training, a senior Pentagon official told us last month."

See also

References

  1. Hendrik Hertzberg (May 30, 2005). "Big News Week". New Yorker magazine. Archived from the original on 13 November 2007. Retrieved 2007-12-24.
  2. "Guantánamo denounced as a "gulag"". 26 May 2005.
  3. "Formica Report Annex #195 Sworn Statement of [redacted]". ACLU. Retrieved 2007-12-24.
  4. "ICRC told US of Quran abuse in 2002". Al Jazeera. May 21, 2005. Archived from the original on August 30, 2006. Retrieved 2007-12-24.
  5. "ICRC told US of Quran abuse in 2002". www.aljazeera.com.
  6. "Returning Afghans Talk of Guantanamo (washingtonpost.com)". The Washington Post. May 14, 2011. Archived from the original on May 14, 2011.
  7. John Mintz (May 14, 2005). "Pentagon Probes Detainee Reports Of Koran Dumping". The Washington Post. pp. A16. Archived from the original on 2011-05-14. Retrieved 2007-12-24.
  8. "Four British Guantanamo detainees sue US". The Irish Times.
  9. "Desecration of Koran Had Been Reported Before". www.washingtonpost.com.
  10. "Why Muslims distrust the West - The Boston Globe - Boston.com - Op-ed - News". archive.boston.com.
  11. "Desecration of Koran Had Been Reported Before". NBC News. 18 May 2005. Archived from the original on April 14, 2021.
  12. York, JOHN FREEMAN; Special to The Courant John Freeman is a writer in New (16 January 2005). "GUANTANAMO LIKE ABU GHRAIB". courant.com.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  13. "Lawyers allege abuse of 12 at Guantanamo". www.inquirer.com. Archived from the original on 2006-02-19. Retrieved 2021-04-14.
  14. "Captives allege religious abuse | Miami Herald". Miami Herald. Archived from the original on 2021-02-12.
  15. John Barry and Michael Isikoff, Gitmo: SouthCom Showdown Archived 2011-01-26 at the Wayback Machine, Newsweek, May 9, 2005
  16. "Afghan anti-US violence escalates". BBC. 12 May 2005. Archived from the original on 2006-02-21. Retrieved 2007-12-24.
  17. "Karzai condemns anti-US protests". BBC. 14 May 2005. Archived from the original on 2008-12-17. Retrieved 2007-12-24.
  18. Jacquelyn S. Porth (12 May 2005). "Afghan Riots Not Tied to Report on Quran Handling, General Says: Army investigating allegations of mishandling at Guantanamo Bay facility". United States Department of State. Archived from the original on 17 November 2007. Retrieved 2007-12-24.
  19. Richard A. Serrano, John Daniszewski (May 22, 2005). "Dozens Have Alleged Koran's Mishandling". Los Angeles Times. pp. A.1. Archived from the original on 2007-09-30. Retrieved 2007-12-24.
  20. "Red Cross 'raised Koran concerns'". BBC. 19 May 2005. Archived from the original on 2008-02-27. Retrieved 2007-12-24.
  21. Daniel McGrory, Zahid Hussain (July 22, 2005). "Cousin listened to boasts about suicide mission". The Times. Archived from the original on 2008-08-08. Retrieved 2007-12-24.
  22. "British ex-detainees back claims US interrogators abused Koran". The Birmingham Post. May 17, 2005. Archived from the original on December 4, 2017. Retrieved May 4, 2016. But in his testimony to Islamic human rights website Cageprisoners.com, Mr Begg said it was 'widely known' that a US Marine had torn up a copy of the Koran in Kandahar. He adds: 'In Bagram, that same year (2002), I saw incidents that provoked fury, including the placing of Qurans (Korans) in an area used as a latrine.
  23. "Britons Allege They Saw US Guards Desecrate Quran". Cage Prisoners. May 17, 2005. Archived from the original on 2017-03-26. Retrieved 2016-05-04.
  24. "More Detainees Claim Quran Abuse". www.cbsnews.com. 28 June 2005.
  25. "Dozens Have Alleged Koran's Mishandling". Los Angeles Times. May 22, 2005.
  26. "Iraqi, Afghan detainees claim Koran abuse". The Age. May 24, 2005.
  27. Jay Hood (June 3, 2005). "Koran Inquiry: Description of Incidents" (PDF). Southcom. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-05-30. Retrieved 2007-12-24.
  28. ^ "U.S. admits abuses to Quran in Guantanamo". CBC. June 4, 2005. Archived from the original on 2007-08-20. Retrieved 2007-12-24.
  29. Jay Hood (February 1, 2005). "Excerpts from Joint Task Force Guantanamo Headquarters, Detention Operations Group Standard Operating Procedures" (PDF). Southcom. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-05-30. Retrieved 2007-12-24.
  30. Jay Hood (June 3, 2005). "HOOD COMPLETES KORAN INQUIRY" (PDF). Southcom. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-05-30. Retrieved 2007-12-24.
  31. "FBI records detail Koran claims". May 26, 2005 – via news.bbc.co.uk.
  32. "FBI cites Koran abuse". SBS News. Archived from the original on 2021-04-14. Retrieved 2021-04-14.
  33. "Detainees Told FBI of Koran Desecration". Los Angeles Times. May 26, 2005.
  34. redacted (August 2, 2002). "Investigation on redacted" (PDF). FBI. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-09-29. Retrieved 2007-12-19.
  35. "Humanitarian | Thomson Reuters Foundation News". news.trust.org.
  36. "Al Qaeda Training Manual". March 31, 2005. Archived from the original on March 31, 2005.
  37. Juan Cole (May 16, 2005). "Guantanamo Controversies: The Bible and the Koran". Archived from the original on 9 November 2007. Retrieved 2007-12-19.
  38. Mayer, Jane (July 6, 2005). "In Gitmo". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on July 9, 2005.
  39. Gregg Bloche, Jonathon H. Marks (November 14, 2005). "Doing Unto Others as They Did Unto Us". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2011-05-05. Retrieved 2007-12-19.

External links

Controversies surrounding people captured during the War on Terror
Guantanamo Bay
detention camp
CIA black site operations
Prison and detainee abuse
Prison uprisings
and escapes
Deaths in custody
Tortured
Forced disappearances
Reports and legal developments
Related media
Categories: