Revision as of 05:50, 15 May 2017 editSeraphim System (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,199 edits added new source, provided attribution for existing sources and expanded section →Attitude towards sexuality← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 07:17, 13 December 2024 edit undoJCW-CleanerBot (talk | contribs)Bots129,453 editsm clean up, replaced: Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte → Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte:Tag: AWB | ||
(261 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|none}} | |||
{{Multiple issues| | |||
Jewish traditions across different eras and regions devote considerable attention to sexuality.<ref name=":1">{{Cite book |chapter-url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-guide-to-jewish-history-religion-and-culture/jewish-private-life-gender-marriage-and-the-lives-of-women/A40EA9FFE1AAA178F47DC942A01336B8 |chapter=Jewish Private Life: Gender, Marriage, and the Lives of Women |last=Baskin |first=Judith R. |editor2-first=Kenneth |editor2-last=Seeskin |editor1-first=Judith R |editor1-last=Baskin |year=2010 |website=The Cambridge Guide to Jewish History, Religion, and Culture |language=en |doi=10.1017/cbo9780511780899.016 |access-date=2019-02-14 |title=The Cambridge Guide to ''Jewish'' History, Religion, and Culture |pages=357–380 |isbn=9780511780899}}</ref><ref>Seidman, Naomi. "Carnal Knowledge: Sex and the Body in Jewish Studies." Jewish Social Studies. New Series, Vol. 1, No. 1 (Autumn, 1994), pp. 115-146.</ref> Sexuality is the subject of many narratives and laws in the ] (Hebrew Bible) and ]. | |||
{{Religious text primary|date=September 2014}} | |||
{{POV|date=July 2015}} | |||
}} | |||
The Jewish tradition devotes considerable attention to sexuality. Sexuality is the subject of many narratives and laws in the ] and ]. | |||
In Judaism, sexuality is viewed as having both positive and negative potential, depending on the context in which it is expressed. Sexual activity has traditionally often been viewed as a grave sin if it is outside of the bounds of permissible behavior. On the other hand, many sources express a positive attitude towards sex between a married couple, also within same-sex marriages according to ], ], and ], and to a certain degree ]. | |||
== Attitude towards sexuality == | |||
In Judaism, sexuality is viewed as having both positive and negative potential, depending on the context in which it is expressed. According to the Rabbinical enumerations of the ], the commandment to procreate is the first ] in the ]:<ref>See Rambam, Sefer Hamitzvot mitzvah #125 and Sefer haChinnuch mitzvah #1</ref> | |||
== Attitudes towards sexuality within marriage== | |||
{{quote | |||
|text="And God blessed them; and God said unto them: '''Be fruitful, and multiply''' , and replenish the earth, and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that creepeth upon the earth" | |||
|sign= ], 1:28 | |||
}} | |||
===Laws and Biblical sources=== | |||
This commandment, known as ''pru urvu'' (פרו ורבו), is only binding on men; women are exempt because childbirth puts them in physical danger, though a dissenting opinion is recorded in the ] Yevamot 6:6. This commandment was originally binding on all of humanity, as it was given to ], the progenitor of all mankind. However, after the giving of the Torah it became obligatory on Jews only.{{citation needed|date=April 2014}} | |||
According to medieval Rabbinical enumerations of the ], the ] ({{Bibleverse|Genesis|1:28|HE}}) is the first ] in the ].<ref name=pr>See ] (Jerusalem: Rav Kook Institute, 1990), p. 55.</ref> This commandment was understood by the rabbis to be only binding on men; women are exempt, though minority views imposed the obligation on both men and women.<ref>] Yevamot 6:6</ref> One of the common explanation for this was because childbirth puts them in physical danger, therefore they cannot be ordered to accomplish an act that put them at risk.<ref>] Hilchot Ishut 15:2</ref><ref>Judith Hauptman, Rereading the Rabbis, 130-149</ref> According to many thinkers, the central nature of this mitzvah is due to the fact that God desires for the world to be populated.<ref name=pr/> | |||
There is another Torah commandment known as '']'' which obligates a man to provide pleasurable sexual intercourse to his wife on a regular basis (if she desires it), even if they have already had children, or are incapable of having children.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://jwa.org/encyclopedia/article/baalei-ha-nefesh|title=Ba'alei Ha-Nefesh {{!}} Jewish Women's Archive|website=jwa.org|access-date=2019-02-28}}</ref><ref></ref> | |||
{{Bibleverse|Deuteronomy|24:5|HE}} requires a man who has been married within the last year to "gladden" his wife at home, rather than joining the army to fight in a war which is ongoing. In later Jewish tradition, this is understood as a general requirement for every husband to stay at home with his wife for the first year of marriage, and for them to "rejoice" together.<ref></ref> | |||
The Jewish ] recognized that the sexual need of mankind (also known as ''Yitzra De'arayot'') is essential for perpetuating society, despite having its negative sides which may lead to sins. For this reason, Chazal's attitude and statements on the matter are dual, and they recognize two inclinations in mankind, the '']'' (the "Good inclination") and the ] (the "evil inclination"), that can both influence sexuality and sexual behaviours. ] discusses this dichotomy explicitly: | |||
] permits a married couple to engage in nearly any form of sexual activity: | |||
{{quote | |||
{{Blockquote | |||
|text="A man's wife is permitted to him. Therefore a man may do whatever he desires with his wife. He may engage in relations whenever he desires, kiss any organ he desires, engage in vaginal or other intercourse or engage in physical intimacy without relations, provided he does not release ]. Nevertheless, it is pious conduct for a person not to act frivolously concerning such matters and to sanctify himself at the time of relations, as explained in ''Hilchot Deot''. He should not depart from the ordinary pattern of the world. For this act was solely for the sake of procreation... | |||
|text=A man's wife is permitted to him. Therefore, a man may do whatever he desires with his wife. He may engage in relations whenever he desires, kiss any organ he desires, engage in vaginal or other intercourse, or engage in physical intimacy without relations, provided he does not release ].<ref name=mt>], Issurei Biah, 21:9,11</ref> | |||
|sign= | |||
}} | }} | ||
In many sources, it is recommended that husband and wife have sex on ]. Often, this is said to be related to the obligation to delight in the Sabbath.<ref>], Hilkhot Shabbat 30:14</ref> There are also other reasons that contributed to this tradition, including saying that this is the only day of the week when Torah scholars have time, or that this is in order to imitate cosmic unions that happens on Friday night between God and the ], as imagined by the ]. | |||
{{quote | |||
|text=... Our Sages do not derive satisfaction from a person who engages in sexual relations excessively and frequents his wife like a ]. This reflects a very blemished ; it is the way underdeveloped people conduct themselves. Instead, everyone who minimizes his sexual conduct is praiseworthy, provided he does not neglect his conjugal duties, without the consent of his wife" | |||
Any emission of semen by a man makes him ], and if this occurs during sex with a woman, she too becomes ritually impure. However, there is no prohibition on becoming ritually impure, and no consequence to ritual impurity except the inability to visit the ] or touch certain sanctified objects. Since the Temple has been destroyed in the 1st c. CE, these are practically not a concern anymore.<ref>{{Bibleverse|Leviticus|15:16-18|HE}}; see also ]</ref> | |||
|sign= ], Issurei Biah, 21:9,11 | |||
===Acceptance of the value of sex in a marriage=== | |||
Some might say that in the Talmud and other classical rabbinic texts, "there is no revulsion from pleasure nor recoil from romantic passion."<ref>], </ref> Others might disagree and find there texts that do reject lust, for example. One passage suggests that sexual relations are one of three activities which are "a taste of the world to come".<ref>Brachot 57b</ref> Elsewhere, the Talmud criticizes one who sleeps in the same room as a husband and wife, preventing them from having sex that night.<ref>Eruvin 63b</ref> Another example of seemingly positive attitude to marital sexuality is ]'s statement that the purpose of ] laws is so that, upon the couple's resumption of sexual activity, "she should be as desirable to her husband as when she entered the marriage canopy."<ref></ref> | |||
In one story in the Talmud, while ] was having sex with his wife, his student ] hid underneath the bed. Rav scolded Kahana for this behavior, but Kahana countered that sex is part of the Torah, and therefore he must learn about it from his teacher.<ref>Babylonian Talmud, Berakhot 62a</ref> | |||
While sexual lust is categorized as a form of "evil inclination" (]), the rabbis recognized its necessity as a motivator of procreation, and thus described it as "very good" in one source.<ref>] 9:7; see also Yoma 69b</ref> | |||
Other talmudic texts show less enthusiasm regarding sexual activity. Thus, for example, some texts say that the above mentioned impurity created by ejaculation exists "in order that Torah scholars would not be with their wives like roosters" (B. Berakhot 22a): in other words, to reduce their sexual activity. | |||
According to ''Iggeret HaKodesh'' ("The Holy Letter", a 12th-century work sometimes mistakenly attributed to ]<ref></ref>), a man should arouse his wife during sex, and even that he should ensure that she achieves orgasm before he does. He also says: "But we who have the Torah and believe that God created all in His wisdom created anything inherently ugly or unseemly. If we were to say that intercourse is repulsive, then we blaspheme God who made the genitals". | |||
Some medieval rabbis even allowed forms of contraception (which otherwise might be forbidden) so that couples could engage in sex for pleasure.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qrptAAAAMAAJ|title=Jewish history: essays in honour of Chimen Abramsky|last=Assis|first=Yom Tov|date=1988|publisher=Halban|isbn=9781870015196|pages=25–59|language=en|chapter=Sexual behaviour in mediaeval Hispano-Jewish society}}</ref> | |||
===Ascetic views=== | |||
Despite the general acceptance of sexuality in marriage as described above, some sources advocate that especially pious people should minimize their engagement in sex. | |||
According to rabbinic sources, ] was physically separate from his wife ] while he fulfilled his role as prophet and leader of the Jewish people. This has been understood in various ways. According to one view, ritual purity is a precondition for prophecy, and Moses avoided sex to ensure he was ritually pure and able to receive prophecy at any moment. According to Maimonides, though, sexual pleasure is a distraction which is incompatible with the intellectual focus needed for high-level prophecy. No other prophet separated from his wife; only Moses had this high level of prophecy. This is not actually an ascetic view towards sexuality; rather it was a one-off exception.<ref></ref> | |||
] permits a married couple to engage in nearly any form of sexual activity, but praises one who limits sexual activity to the minimum necessary: | |||
{{Blockquote | |||
|text=A man's wife is permitted to him. Therefore, a man may do whatever he desires with his wife... Nevertheless, it is pious conduct for a person not to act frivolously concerning such matters, and to sanctify himself at the time of relations, as explained in ''Hilchot Deot''. He should not depart from the ordinary pattern of the world. For this act was solely for the sake of procreation... Our Sages do not derive satisfaction from a person who engages in sexual relations excessively and frequents his wife like a ]. This reflects a very blemished ; it is the way underdeveloped people conduct themselves. Instead, everyone who minimizes his sexual conduct is praiseworthy, provided he does not neglect his conjugal duties, without the consent of his wife.<ref name=mt/> | |||
}} | }} | ||
] went further, writing that "sexual relations are remote and disgusting according to the Torah, except for the perpetuation of the human species".<ref>Nahmanides, commentary to Leviticus 18:6</ref> | |||
Some theologians, including Rabbi Michael Gold, have argued that the basic Jewish positive attitude towards sex and sexuality within marriage is opposed to Christianity.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/the-purpose-and-meaning-of-sex-in-judaism/ |title=The Purpose and Meaning of Sex in Judaism |author=Rabbi Michael Gold |access-date=April 20, 2017 |quote=Judaism rejected the negative teachings about sex that later became prevalent in Christianity}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.thelocal.se/20100709/27708 |title=Jews better at sex than Christians: theologian |publisher=The Local Europe AB |access-date=May 2, 2017 |quote=Leif Carlsson, a speaker at the Hönö Conference, wants Christians to come to terms with the faith's negative views on sex and compare them with those found in Judaism, according to a report in Christian newspaper Dagen... Within Judaism, sexuality has always been viewed as something fundamentally good.}}</ref>The BBC reported that "Christianity's suspicions of sex as an element of 'the fall' are absent" in Jewish tradition, which holds that God commanded his people to "be fruitful and multiply."<ref>{{Cite web |title=Judaism and contraception |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/judaism/jewishethics/contraception.shtml |date=July 21, 2009 |access-date=May 2, 2017 |publisher=BBC |quote=Judaism has had a largely positive attitude to sex since God commanded his people to 'be fruitful and multiply' (Genesis I:28; 9:1). Christianity's suspicions of sex as an element of 'the fall' are absent.}}</ref> | |||
Christian writers developed more restrictive views of sex then rabbis.<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.co.il/books?id=SiGe-Zf0nTIC&pg=PA74&lpg=PA74&dq=sex+in+judaism+as+opposed+to+in+christianity&source=bl&ots=R3fTSYES2b&sig=jVpFUC-Xyxla81ImMAX14GJ95is&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiTuorXhtHTAhWFLsAKHXVuAeYQ6AEIXzAK#v=onepage&q=sex%20in%20judaism%20as%20opposed%20to%20in%20christianity&f=false |title=Law, Sex, and Christian Society in Medieval Europe |author=James A. Brundage |publisher=University of Chicago Press |year=1987 |page=74 |quote=Hebrew tradition viewed marital sex as a divinely ordained component of human life. Since God wished humans to increase and multiply and since he had endowed their sexual organs with the capacity to produce exquisite pleasure, the rabbis saw no reason to limit the individual's enjoyment of sex... Christian writers began nto express much more rstrictive view of the role of sex in human life.}}</ref> Early Christian writers, including ], were influenced by the philosophy of ]. Clement wrote that "moral self-restraint is common to all human beings who have chosen it." Under this view ] could submit their bodily impulses to the "rational will". <ref>{{cite book|last1=Pagels|first1=Elaine|title=Adam, Eve and the Serpent|date=1989|publisher=Vintage}}</ref> James A. Brundage points out that in Jewish tradition rabbis did not think enjoyment of sex needed to be restricted because God has given humans the capacity to "produce exquisite pleasure" through sexual acts.<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.co.il/books?id=SiGe-Zf0nTIC&pg=PA74&lpg=PA74&dq=sex+in+judaism+as+opposed+to+in+christianity&source=bl&ots=R3fTSYES2b&sig=jVpFUC-Xyxla81ImMAX14GJ95is&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiTuorXhtHTAhWFLsAKHXVuAeYQ6AEIXzAK#v=onepage&q=sex%20in%20judaism%20as%20opposed%20to%20in%20christianity&f=false |title=Law, Sex, and Christian Society in Medieval Europe |author=James A. Brundage |publisher=University of Chicago Press |year=1987 |page=74 |quote=Hebrew tradition viewed marital sex as a divinely ordained component of human life. Since God wished humans to increase and multiply and since he had endowed their sexual organs with the capacity to produce exquisite pleasure, the rabbis saw no reason to limit the individual's enjoyment of sex... Christian writers began nto express much more rstrictive view of the role of sex in human life.}}</ref> | |||
According to ], there are four permitted "kavvanot" (intentions) for a man's sexual relations which receive Divine reward: for procreation, for ] of the ], to fulfill a wife's desire, and that he relieves his lust through intercourse with his wife rather than in a forbidden manner. Yet the last one is a lesser reward, since the man should have had the strength to resist. If he does not show any strength, and has sex anytime he wants, this would not be rewarded.<ref>Raavad, ''Baalei Hanefesh'', Shaar Hakedushah</ref> Although sex would not be rewarded by Heaven in this last case but it is not forbidden either.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Marienberg |first=Evyatar |date=2019-01-01 |title=Evyatar Marienberg, "'Close Your Eyes and Think of These Four': Correct Thoughts During Sex According to an Important 12th Century Provençal Jewish Author", The Medieval Magazine 121 (February 2019), pp. 70-79 |url=https://www.academia.edu/38357389 |journal=The Medieval Magazine}}</ref> | |||
On the other hand, sexual activity is also viewed as a grave sin within Judaism if it outside of the bounds of permissible behavior. Certain types of forbidden sexual behaviors, known as ], are viewed so negatively that a Jew is obliged to sacrifice his life before committing them. | |||
== Forbidden sexual acts in Judaism == | == Forbidden sexual acts in Judaism == | ||
=== Isurei bi'ah === | === Isurei bi'ah === | ||
{{Main |
{{Main|Forbidden relationships in Judaism}} | ||
The term ''isurei bi'ah'' (Hebrew איסורי ביאה) refers to those one may not have intercourse with. The most serious of these form a subset known as ''arayot'' (Hebrew: עריות). Intercourse with arayot is one of the few acts in Judaism which one may not perform even to save one's life. | The term ''isurei bi'ah'' (Hebrew איסורי ביאה) refers to those one may not have intercourse with. The most serious of these form a subset known as ''arayot'' (Hebrew: {{Script/Hebrew|עריות}}), based on the word ''erva'' ("nakedness") in {{Bibleverse|Leviticus|18:6|HE}}. Intercourse with arayot is one of the few acts in Judaism which one may not perform even to save one's life. The term ''erva'' is also used to describe parts of a woman considered to be immodest and sexually provocative, including hair, thighs, and singing voice.{{Cn|date=May 2024}} | ||
Arayot |
Arayot include:{{Cn|date=May 2024}} | ||
* ]<ref>]</ref> | * ]<ref>]</ref> | ||
* Male |
* Male-male anal intercourse | ||
* Bestiality | * Bestiality | ||
* |
* Sex with a Jewish woman during her ] (known as ]) | ||
Other isurei bi'ah include: | Other isurei bi'ah include:{{Cn|date=May 2024}} | ||
* Sexual intercourse between Jews and |
* Sexual intercourse between Jews and Gentiles | ||
* Divorcees or converts |
* Divorcees or female converts with ] (priests) | ||
* ]im |
* ]im (offspring of adulterous unions) with regular Jews | ||
When two people are forbidden from having sex together, the laws of '']'' prohibit them from engaging in lesser sexual touch (including hugging and kissing), while the laws of '']'' prohibit them from spending time together in private in a manner that would allow them to have sex undetected. These prohibitions do not apply in certain situations where sexual relationships are unlikely, for example among close family members.{{Cn|date=May 2024}} | |||
==== Homosexuality and bisexuality ==== | |||
{{See also|Judaism and sexual orientation}} | |||
=== Homosexuality === | |||
The traditional view is that the ] forbids all anal intercourse between two males, and this is the view of ]; there are other modern views that disagree. The source of this prohibition is a verse from the ]: "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind; it is abomination." (Leviticus, 18:22). However, ] interpreted the matter as only prohibiting anal sexual acts between two men (and not other sexual acts between them), as he stated: "As one would penetrate a blue-brush into a receiver." But other authoritative commentators of the Torah see all sexual acts between two males to be included within the ban on "sperm in vain".{{Citation needed|date=January 2012}} The Jewish sages added additional barriers to this ban, and forbid males to put themselves in any situation that might lead to such an offense. For example: Chazal prohibited two single males from sleeping under the same blanket.{{Citation needed|date=July 2012}} | |||
{{Main|Homosexuality and Judaism}} | |||
The traditional view is that the ] forbids ] between two males (i.e. ]), and this is the view of ], based on {{Bibleverse|Leviticus|18:22|HE}}: "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind; it is abomination."<ref name=":2">{{cite web |title=Translations and interpretations of Leviticus 18:22; all views |url=http://www.religioustolerance.org/interpreting-Leviticus-18-22.htm |access-date=19 June 2019 |website=www.religioustolerance.org}}</ref><ref>Babylonian Talmud Sanhedrin 54a and b; Josephus, Against Apion 2.199; and Philo, Abraham 135. Some modern authors stating this view include {{harvp|Alter|2004|p=623, 632}}; {{harvp|Boyarin|1995|p=339, 343}}; {{harvp|Brooten|1996|p=61}}; {{harvp|Cohen|1990|p=6}}; {{harvp|Daube|1986|p=447}}; {{harvp|Milgrom|2000|p=1568}}; {{harvp|Olyan|1994|p=185}}; {{harvp|Thurston|1990|p=16}}; and {{harvp|Walsh|2001|p=208}}.</ref>{{sfnp|Brodsky|2009}} Rabbinic sources extend this prohibition to all other sexual acts between two men, which are prohibited similar to how they would be prohibited between an unmarried man and woman.<ref>Yonatan Rosensweig, התמודדות מקראית פרשנית הלכתית ומחשבתית עם משכב זכר</ref> | |||
There is no ban on female-female intercourse in the ], but in later rabbinical halakhic texts such is mentioned as a forbidden act, as ] wrote: "A conduct of women rubbing oneself against the other, lesbians" (Maimonides' ], Book of Kedushah, Issurei Biah, 21:8).<ref></ref> | |||
There is no explicit ban on female-female intercourse in the ], but it is similarly condemned in later rabbinical halakhic texts.<ref>Maimonides' ], Book of Kedushah, Issurei Biah, 21:8; {{cite web|url=http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/7024/jewish/Perek-21.htm|title=Issurey Bi'ah - Perek 21 - איסורי ביאה - פרק כא|website=www.chabad.org|language=Hebrew}}</ref> | |||
==== Extramarital sex ==== | |||
Opinions on extramarital sex differ. It is universally frowned upon; according to some authorities it even falls under a biblical prohibition. | |||
Classical rabbinic sources also condemn marriage between two men, which they see as an activity performed by non-Jews which invited Divine punishment.<ref>Chullin 92a-b; ] 26:5</ref> | |||
=== Masturbation === | |||
Some medieval Jewish authors wrote fiction and poetry which portrayed homosexual love positively,<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|title=Eros and the Jews : from biblical Israel to contemporary America|author1-link=David Biale|author1=Biale, David|date=1997|publisher=University of California Press|isbn=978-0520211346|location=Berkeley|oclc=36681737}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Decter|first=Jonathan|date=September 2011|title=A Hebrew "sodomite" tale from thirteenth-century Toledo: Jacob Ben El'azar's story of Sapir, Shapir, and Birsha|journal=Journal of Medieval Iberian Studies|volume=3|issue=2|pages=187–202|doi=10.1080/17546559.2011.610176|s2cid=159695995|issn=1754-6559}}</ref> though often these seem to be adaptations of a style found in contemporary Arabic poetry, unlikely to be based on real-life love affairs. These narratives are not intended as literal accounts, instead conveying a more symbolic message.<ref>Raymond P. Scheindlin, "A Miniature Anthology of Medieval Hebrew Love Poems", ''Prooftexts'', Vol. 5, No. 2 (MAY 1985), pp. 105-135</ref> | |||
{{Cleanup|section|date=August 2013|reason=It appears that another article entitled "Sperm in vain" has been inexpertly merged into this section. Cleanup is therefore needed}} | |||
In ], homosexual relationships are considered acceptable,<ref>BBC Religions, </ref> and weddings are conducted for same-sex couples.<ref>Benjamin Cohen, , ''Pink News'' 25 Nov 2005</ref> This is also true for several other liberal Jewish denominations. | |||
{{Main article|Judaism and masturbation}} | |||
=== Extramarital sex === | |||
Despite not having been explicitly prohibited in the Torah,<ref>] stated that the Tanakh does not explicitly prohibit masturbation, see Maimonides, ''Commentary to the Mishnah, Sanhedrin'' 7:4, apud {{cite book|last1=Dorff|first1=Elliot N.|author-link1=Elliot N. Dorff|last2= |first2= |author-link2= |last3= |first3= |author-link3= |last4= |first4= |author-link4= |last5= |first5= |author-link5= |display-authors= |author-mask= |author-name-separator= |author-separator= |lastauthoramp= |date= |year=2003|origyear=1998|chapter=Chapter Five. Preventing Pregnancy|trans_chapter= |chapterurl=https://books.google.com/books?id=lp9zk0IGZpgC&pg=PA117 |editor1-last= |editor1-first= |editor1-link= |editor2-last= |editor2-first= |editor2-link= |editor3-last= |editor3-first= |editor3-link= |editor4-last= |editor4-first= |editor4-link= |editor5-last= |editor5-first= |editor5-link= |display-editors= |title=Matters of life and death : a Jewish approach to modern medical ethics|trans_title= |url= |format= |type= |series= |language= |volume= |issue= |others= |edition=First paperback|location=Philadelphia, PA|publisher=Jewish Publication Society|publication-date= |page=117|pages= |at= |nopp= |arxiv= |asin= |bibcode= |doi= |doi_brokendate= |isbn=0827607687|issn= |jfm= |jstor= |lccn= |mr= |oclc=80557192|ol= |osti= |pmc= |pmid= |rfc= |ssrn= |zbl= |id= |accessdate= |via= |registration= |subscription= |laysummary= |laysource= |laydate= |quote=Jews historically shared the abhorrence of male masturbation that characterized other societies.<sup>2</sup> Interestingly, although the prohibition was not debated, legal writers had difficulty locating a biblical base for it, and no less an authority than Maimonides claimed that it could not be punishable by the court because there was not an explicit negative commandment forbidding it.<sup>3</sup>|separator= |postscript= |ref= }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Patton|first=Michael S.|date=June 1985|title=Masturbation from Judaism to Victorianism|journal=Journal of Religion and Health|volume=24|issue=2|pages=133–146|publisher=Springer Netherlands|issn=0022-4197|doi=10.1007/BF01532257|accessdate=12 November 2011|url=http://www.springerlink.com/content/r407h39183426645/|quote=Nevertheless, there is no legislation in the Bible pertaining to masturbation.|pmid=24306073}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Kwee|first=Alex W.|author2=David C. Hoover |year=2008|title=Theologically-Informed Education about Masturbation: A Male Sexual Health Perspective|journal=Journal of Psychology and Theology|volume=36|issue=4|pages=258–269|location=La Mirada, CA, USA|publisher=Rosemead School of Psychology. Biola University|issn=0091-6471|accessdate=12 November 2011|url=http://www.alexkwee.com/uploads/kwee_hoover08.pdf|quote=The Bible presents no clear theological ethic on masturbation, leaving many young unmarried Christians with confusion and guilt around their sexuality.}}</ref> the ] and the ] view ] as an Halakhic prohibition and a great sin. The attitude towards a male sperm is one of a potential future living human being, and thus masturbation is referred to as a murder, in which the masturbator is exterminating his potential offspring. | |||
Extramarital sex is frowned upon by all Jewish groups, even though its legal meaning is not always obvious; according to some authorities, it falls under a biblical prohibition. Traditionally and according to Torah adultery is only defined by sex involving a married woman; a married man do not commit adultery if he has sex with an unmarried woman. Some contemporary thinkers conjecture that the written Torah never explicitly forbids sex outside the context of marriage, with the exception of adultery<ref name=coogan> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110919213022/http://www.summitstonehill.com/opinion/5-questions-with-professor-michael-d-coogan-1.1716380 |date=2011-09-19 }} The Summit, October 19, 2010. New URL: http://admin2.collegepublisher.com/se/the-summit/opinion/5-questions-with-professor-michael-d-coogan-1.1716380 {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110919213022/http://www.summitstonehill.com/opinion/5-questions-with-professor-michael-d-coogan-1.1716380 |date=2011-09-19 }} . Quote: "In ancient Israel, premarital sex by a woman was discouraged because in the patriarchal society of that time, a daughter was her father's property. If she was not a virgin, her value--the bride price her father would get from a prospective husband--was diminished. Also, any child born to an unmarried woman would be fatherless--the Biblical term is "orphan"-- and so, without either a male protector or any possibility of an inheritance, which was passed from father to son. There is no explicit prohibition in the Old Testament of premarital or extramarital sex by men, except for adultery, which meant having sex with another man's wife."</ref><ref name="incest"/> and incest,<ref name="incest">{{cite web|url=http://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/traditional-sources-on-sex-outside-marriage/|title=Traditional Sources on Sex Outside Marriage - My Jewish Learning}}</ref> however, most authorities<ref>{{Cite web |title=Sefer HaMitzvot, Negative Commandments 355:1 |url=https://www.sefaria.org/Sefer_HaMitzvot,_Negative_Commandments.355.1?lang=he&with=Deuteronomy&lang2=he |access-date=2023-04-16 |website=www.sefaria.org}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Maimonides |first=Rabbi Moses |title=Mishneh Torah, Negative Mitzvot 355 |url=https://www.sefaria.org/Mishneh_Torah%2C_Negative_Mitzvot.355?lang=bi}}</ref> understand it to be explicit in Deuteronomy 23:18, "No Israelite woman shall be a prostitute". According to {{bibleverse|Exodus|22:15-16|HE}}, the man who entices<ref>{{cite web|url=http://lexiconcordance.com/hebrew/6601.html|title=Strong's Number 6601 Hebrew Dictionary of the Old Testament Online Bible with Strong's Exhaustive Concordance, Brown Driver Briggs Lexicon, Etymology, Translations Definitions Meanings & Key Word Studies - Lexiconcordance.com|website=lexiconcordance.com}}</ref> a single woman to have sex must offer to marry her afterwards or the equivalent in compensation, unless her father refuses to allow him. This law is only for virginal women, as their value in the marriage market, as it were, decreases. Therefore, the man must either offer to marry her or pay for her lesser value, as it were, in a marriage market that highly values virginity.<ref name="Broyde2005">{{cite book|first=Michael J.|last=Broyde|title=Marriage, Sex and Family in Judaism|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nRy_AAAAQBAJ&pg=PA96|date=22 August 2005|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield Publishers|isbn=978-1-4616-3996-1|page=96}}</ref> | |||
=== Masturbation === | |||
Sperm in vain (]: זרע לבטלה, pronounced: ''Zera Levatala'') is a Talmudic term for any sexual act in which a male's sperm is consciously "wasted".<ref> i.e., released as an act not for the purpose of procreation, or in normal intercourse with one's wife, even when she is for whatever reason not able to become pregnant from that seed, Glossary</ref> However, if his wife is pregnant, infertile, or elderly it is not considered wasting seed since this is for the purpose of fulfilling the "]" Mitzvah-commandment, the husband's marital obligations. | |||
{{Main|Judaism and masturbation}} | |||
Despite not having been prohibited in the Torah in the form of an explicit commandment,<ref>] stated that the Tanakh does not explicitly prohibit masturbation, see Maimonides, ''Commentary to the Mishnah, Sanhedrin'' 7:4, apud {{cite book|last1=Dorff|first1=Elliot N.|author-link1=Elliot N. Dorff|year=2003|orig-year=1998|chapter=Chapter Five. Preventing Pregnancy|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lp9zk0IGZpgC&pg=PA117|title=Matters of life and death : a Jewish approach to modern medical ethics|edition=First paperback|location=Philadelphia, PA|publisher=Jewish Publication Society|page=|isbn=978-0827607682|oclc=80557192|quote=Jews historically shared the abhorrence of male masturbation that characterized other societies.<sup>2</sup> Although the prohibition was not debated, legal writers had difficulty locating a biblical base for it, and no less an authority than Maimonides claimed that it could not be punishable by the court because there was not an explicit negative commandment forbidding it.<sup>3</sup>|url=https://archive.org/details/mattersoflifedea0000dorf/page/117}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Patton|first=Michael S.|date=June 1985|title=Masturbation from Judaism to Victorianism|journal=Journal of Religion and Health|volume=24|issue=2|pages=133–146|issn=0022-4197|doi=10.1007/BF01532257|quote=Nevertheless, there is no legislation in the Bible pertaining to masturbation.|pmid=24306073|s2cid=39066052}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Kwee|first=Alex W.|author2=David C. Hoover |year=2008|title=Theologically-Informed Education about Masturbation: A Male Sexual Health Perspective|journal=Journal of Psychology and Theology|volume=36|issue=4|pages=258–269|issn=0091-6471|access-date=12 November 2011|url=http://www.alexkwee.com/uploads/kwee_hoover08.pdf|quote=The Bible presents no clear theological ethic on masturbation, leaving many young unmarried Christians with confusion and guilt around their sexuality.|doi=10.1177/009164710803600402|s2cid=142040707}}</ref><ref name="eva60">{{cite book |last1=Williams |first1=Daniel K. |year=2013 |chapter=5. Sex and the Evangelicals: Gender Issues, the Sexual Revolution, and Abortion in the 1960s |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LfK9AAAAQBAJ&dq=masturbation+bible+evangelicals+sexual+revolution&pg=PA104 |editor1-last=Schäfer |editor1-first=Axel R. |title=American Evangelicals and the 1960s |location=Madison, Wisconsin |publisher=University of Wisconsin Press|page=104|isbn= 978-0-299-29363-5 |oclc=811239040 |quote=The leading evangelical sex advice books of the late 1940s had contained strong warnings against masturbation, placing it in the same category of such sexual sins as homosexuality and prostitution. Even in the early 1960s, some evangelical sexual advice books for teens still contained warnings about masturbation, but by the end of the decade, those warnings had disappeared, because evangelicals who noticed that the Bible said nothing directly about masturbation believed that they had made a mistake to proscribe it.<sup>19</sup>}}</ref> the ] and the ] view male ] as a Halakhic prohibition and a great sin, deriving it as a biblical prohibition from Genesis 38:7.<ref>Babylonian Talmud, Niddah 13a-b</ref> The attitude towards a male sperm is one of a potential future living human being, and thus, masturbation is referred to as morally, though not legally, similar to murder, in that the masturbator is exterminating his potential offspring. Kabbalistic literature declared the act of masturbation to be a major sin. | |||
{{quote | |||
|text=But why all these precautions? — Because otherwise one might emit semen in vain, and R. Johanan stated: Whosoever emits semen in vain deserves death, for it is said in Scripture. | |||
|sign= Babylon ], Tractate Niddah, p. 13a | |||
}} | |||
Female masturbation is less frowned upon, and indeed very rarely mentioned in any Jewish text.{{Citation needed|date=December 2024}} | |||
Prior to the 20th century, it was a Jewish term usually (but not only) referring to male masturbation. In '']'', on ], it is stated that wasting sperm is considered a sin greater than any sin in the ]. In modern days, the Halakhic question on whether taking male semen and sperm for the purpose of medical examinations or insemination remains in dispute among Jewish legal authorities. | |||
In modern days, the Halakhic question on whether taking male semen for the purpose of medical examinations or insemination is a sin remains in dispute among Jewish legal authorities.<ref></ref> | |||
Homosexual intercourse is also considered an act of sperm in vain, in addition to having its own prohibition. According to many opinions, even marital sexual acts in which the sperm does not enter the vagina are considered no less an act of sperm in vain. | |||
Many Ashkenazi authorities allowed for a married man to - under certain specific circumstances - ejaculate outside his wife's body as part of their sexual relations together, following a text by ] in his comments on the Shulkhan Arukh.<ref></ref> | |||
The Halakhic attitude towards female masturbation is found in the opinions of the ],<ref>, quoting the ] in ''Shaar HaKavanos, Inyan Drushei Layla'', sec. </ref> who says that it is wrong because it creates evil forces ('']'') and brings the woman to connect spiritually with the evil angel ], and Rabbi ],<ref>''Igros Moshe, Even Ha'ezer'' 1, sec. 69.</ref> who forbids it because it involves indulging in sexual fantasy about men, which falls under the prohibition of forbidden thoughts, which are forbidden for women as well. However, it does not carry the severity of male masturbation, because it does not involve the release of seed. | |||
=== Sexual fantasy |
=== Sexual fantasy === | ||
{{See also|Technology Awareness Group|Atzat Nefesh|Religious views on pornography#Judaism}} | {{See also|Technology Awareness Group|Atzat Nefesh|Religious views on pornography#Judaism}} | ||
The halakhic literature discusses the prohibitions of ''hirhur'' (lit. thought) and ''histaklut'' (lit. gazing). Many of the practices of ] (modesty) serve to prevent these prohibitions from occurring. | The halakhic literature discusses the prohibitions of ''hirhur'' (lit. thought) and ''histaklut'' (lit. gazing).<ref>{{Cite book |title=Shulchan Aruch |pages=Even HaEzer, Siman 21–23}}</ref> Many of the practices of ] (modesty) serve to prevent these prohibitions from occurring. | ||
=== Pornography === | |||
{{See also|Religious views on pornography|Religious views on masturbation}} | |||
Pornography is not explicitly mentioned in any halakhic texts, but it is prohibited by many ] laws. The first of these laws are the laws of ], or modesty. Acting in a pornographic film breaks the rules of modesty by exposing one's naked body. Additionally, those involved in the production of these films (even those who are not being filmed) are breaking the laws of tzniut by looking upon those in a sexually compromised position. The second set of halakhic laws prohibiting the production of pornography are those surrounding extramarital sex. Although extramarital relations were prevalent in the ], rabbis of the ] outlawed extramarital sex. Therefore, sexual intercourse between two unmarried porn actors would be prohibited by halakha. Finally, pornography is prohibited by halakhic laws surrounding masturbation, with which it over goes hand-in-hand. Not only is the viewing of pornographic content forbidden by these laws, but so is the production of pornographic content. The Kitzur Shulchan Arukh prohibits the spilling of seed, thus forbidding that a man engage in sexual intercourse without the intention to conceive. This not only prohibits men from creating pornographic content with a partner or partners, but also from creating solo content. Women, in slight contrast, have no such command to not spill seed, and thus the laws of masturbation do not prohibit them from creating pornographic content. Ultimately, however, people of all genders are prohibited from producing or consuming porn because of the laws of tzniut. | |||
While pornography is specifically prohibited by halakhic texts, modern rabbinic ] have mixed opinions on the subject. For example, it has been argued by some ] rabbis that consuming pornography is the equivalent of having extramarital relations.<ref name="myjewishlearning.com">{{Cite web |title=Judaism and Sex: Questions and Answers |url=https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/judaism-and-sex-questions-and-answers/ |access-date=2023-04-25 |website=My Jewish Learning |language=en-US}}</ref> Contrastingly, some ] rabbis suggest that the consumption of erotic material could benefit marital relations.<ref name="myjewishlearning.com"/> Contemporary rabbis within and between the denominations of Judaism have not come to a consensus as to whether or not pornography is acceptable in the modern age. | |||
== Sexual practices and culture == | |||
The Talmud says that a man cannot force his wife into having sex.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.sefaria.org/Eruvin.100b.14?lang=bi&with=all&lang2=en|title=Eruvin 100b:14|website=www.sefaria.org|access-date=2019-03-17}}</ref> The Talmud also claims that rebellious children will come from people who conceive a child in certain ways, including if a woman has sex out of fear of her husband, if either one is drunk, and if a woman is raped, along with other examples.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.sefaria.org/Nedarim.20b?lang=bi|title=Nedarim 20b|website=www.sefaria.org|access-date=2019-03-17}}</ref> | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
{{Portal|Judaism| |
{{Portal|Judaism|LGBTQ|Israel}} | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] (see the section "Polyamory and religion") | |||
* ] | |||
* ] (see the section "Polyamory and religion") | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] (''Modesty'') | * ] (''Modesty'') | ||
* ] | |||
== Further reading == | |||
* Rabbi Lisa J. Grushcow, ''The Sacred Encounter: Jewish Perspectives on Sexuality'', CCAR Press, 2014, ISBN 9780881232035. | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
{{Reflist}} | {{Reflist}} | ||
===Works cited=== | |||
{{refbegin|2}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Alter |first=Robert |title=The five books of Moses: a translation with commentary |date=2004}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last=Boyarin |first=Daniel |title=Are there any Jews in 'The History of Sexuality'? |journal=] |volume=5 |number=3 |date=1995}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Brodsky |first=David |chapter=Sex in the Talmud: How to Understand Leviticus 18 and 20 |date=28 October 2009 |title=Torah Queeries |pages=157–169 |editor1-last=Drinkwater |editor1-first=Gregg |editor2-last=Lesser |editor2-first=Joshua |editor3-last=Shneer |editor3-first=David |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-8147-2012-7 |doi=10.18574/nyu/9780814720127.003.0030 |chapter-url=http://nyu.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.18574/nyu/9780814720127.001.0001/upso-9780814720127-chapter-30 |access-date=26 January 2021 }} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Brooten |first=Bernadette |title=Love Between Women: Early Christian Responses to Female Homoeroticism |date=1996}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last=Cohen |first=Martin |title=The Biblical Prohibition of Homosexual Intercourse |journal=] |volume=19 |number=4 |date=1990 |pages=3–20 |doi=10.1300/J082v19n04_02 |pmid=2230109}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last=Daube |first=David |title=The Old Testament Prohibitions of Homosexuality |journal=Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Romantische Abteilung |volume=103 |date=1986}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Milgrom |first=Jacob |title=Leviticus 17–22 |date=2000}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1=Olyan |first1=Saul M. |title="And with a Male You Shall Not Lie the Lying down of a Woman": On the Meaning and Significance of Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 |journal=] |date=1994 |volume=5 |issue=2 |pages=179–206 |jstor=3704197 |pmid=11639358 |issn=1043-4070}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Thurston |first=Thomas |chapter=Leviticus 18:22 and the Prohibition of Homosexual Acts |title=Homophobia and the Judeo-Christian Tradition |editor1-first=Michael L. |editor1-last=Stemmeler |editor2-first=J. Michael |editor2-last=Clark |date=1990}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last=Walsh |first=Jerome |title=Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13: Who Is Doing What To Whom? |journal=] |volume=120 |number=2 |date=2001 |pages=201–209 |doi=10.2307/3268292 |jstor=3268292 |url=http://www.sbl-site.org/Publications/JBL/JBL1202.pdf |access-date=2023-01-01 |archive-date=2007-01-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070104151350/http://www.sbl-site.org/Publications/JBL/JBL1202.pdf |url-status=dead }}Also available | |||
{{refend}} | |||
== Further reading == | |||
* Shmuley Boteach, ''Kosher Sex,'' Harmony, 1998. | |||
* Rabbi Lisa J. Grushcow, ''The Sacred Encounter: Jewish Perspectives on Sexuality'', CCAR Press, 2014, {{ISBN|9780881232035}}. | |||
* Seymour Hoffman, ''Standards of Sexual Modesty, Gender Separation and Homosexuality: Rabbinic and Psychological Views'', Mondial, 2020, {{ISBN|9781595694010}}. | |||
* Evyatar Marienberg, '''', Brill, 2022 | |||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
* , for an additional in depth reading on the matter; "My Jewish Learning" - Article | * , for an additional in depth reading on the matter; "My Jewish Learning" - Article | ||
* . | * . | ||
* . | * {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120121005738/http://www.aish.com/sp/so/48949396.html |date=2012-01-21 }}. | ||
* . | * . | ||
* . | * . | ||
Line 113: | Line 152: | ||
{{Halakha}} | {{Halakha}} | ||
{{Sex}} | |||
{{Women in Judaism}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Judaism And Sexuality}} | |||
] | ] |
Latest revision as of 07:17, 13 December 2024
Jewish traditions across different eras and regions devote considerable attention to sexuality. Sexuality is the subject of many narratives and laws in the Tanakh (Hebrew Bible) and rabbinic literature.
In Judaism, sexuality is viewed as having both positive and negative potential, depending on the context in which it is expressed. Sexual activity has traditionally often been viewed as a grave sin if it is outside of the bounds of permissible behavior. On the other hand, many sources express a positive attitude towards sex between a married couple, also within same-sex marriages according to Reconstructionist, Humanistic, and Reform Judaism, and to a certain degree Conservative Judaism.
Attitudes towards sexuality within marriage
Laws and Biblical sources
According to medieval Rabbinical enumerations of the 613 commandments, the commandment to procreate (Genesis 1:28) is the first mitzvah in the Torah. This commandment was understood by the rabbis to be only binding on men; women are exempt, though minority views imposed the obligation on both men and women. One of the common explanation for this was because childbirth puts them in physical danger, therefore they cannot be ordered to accomplish an act that put them at risk. According to many thinkers, the central nature of this mitzvah is due to the fact that God desires for the world to be populated.
There is another Torah commandment known as onah which obligates a man to provide pleasurable sexual intercourse to his wife on a regular basis (if she desires it), even if they have already had children, or are incapable of having children.
Deuteronomy 24:5 requires a man who has been married within the last year to "gladden" his wife at home, rather than joining the army to fight in a war which is ongoing. In later Jewish tradition, this is understood as a general requirement for every husband to stay at home with his wife for the first year of marriage, and for them to "rejoice" together.
Maimonides permits a married couple to engage in nearly any form of sexual activity:
A man's wife is permitted to him. Therefore, a man may do whatever he desires with his wife. He may engage in relations whenever he desires, kiss any organ he desires, engage in vaginal or other intercourse, or engage in physical intimacy without relations, provided he does not release seed in vain.
In many sources, it is recommended that husband and wife have sex on Shabbat. Often, this is said to be related to the obligation to delight in the Sabbath. There are also other reasons that contributed to this tradition, including saying that this is the only day of the week when Torah scholars have time, or that this is in order to imitate cosmic unions that happens on Friday night between God and the Shekihnah, as imagined by the Kabbalists.
Any emission of semen by a man makes him ritually impure, and if this occurs during sex with a woman, she too becomes ritually impure. However, there is no prohibition on becoming ritually impure, and no consequence to ritual impurity except the inability to visit the Temple in Jerusalem or touch certain sanctified objects. Since the Temple has been destroyed in the 1st c. CE, these are practically not a concern anymore.
Acceptance of the value of sex in a marriage
Some might say that in the Talmud and other classical rabbinic texts, "there is no revulsion from pleasure nor recoil from romantic passion." Others might disagree and find there texts that do reject lust, for example. One passage suggests that sexual relations are one of three activities which are "a taste of the world to come". Elsewhere, the Talmud criticizes one who sleeps in the same room as a husband and wife, preventing them from having sex that night. Another example of seemingly positive attitude to marital sexuality is Rabbi Meir's statement that the purpose of niddah laws is so that, upon the couple's resumption of sexual activity, "she should be as desirable to her husband as when she entered the marriage canopy."
In one story in the Talmud, while Rav was having sex with his wife, his student Rav Kahana hid underneath the bed. Rav scolded Kahana for this behavior, but Kahana countered that sex is part of the Torah, and therefore he must learn about it from his teacher.
While sexual lust is categorized as a form of "evil inclination" (yetzer hara), the rabbis recognized its necessity as a motivator of procreation, and thus described it as "very good" in one source.
Other talmudic texts show less enthusiasm regarding sexual activity. Thus, for example, some texts say that the above mentioned impurity created by ejaculation exists "in order that Torah scholars would not be with their wives like roosters" (B. Berakhot 22a): in other words, to reduce their sexual activity.
According to Iggeret HaKodesh ("The Holy Letter", a 12th-century work sometimes mistakenly attributed to Nahmanides), a man should arouse his wife during sex, and even that he should ensure that she achieves orgasm before he does. He also says: "But we who have the Torah and believe that God created all in His wisdom created anything inherently ugly or unseemly. If we were to say that intercourse is repulsive, then we blaspheme God who made the genitals".
Some medieval rabbis even allowed forms of contraception (which otherwise might be forbidden) so that couples could engage in sex for pleasure.
Ascetic views
Despite the general acceptance of sexuality in marriage as described above, some sources advocate that especially pious people should minimize their engagement in sex.
According to rabbinic sources, Moses was physically separate from his wife Tzipporah while he fulfilled his role as prophet and leader of the Jewish people. This has been understood in various ways. According to one view, ritual purity is a precondition for prophecy, and Moses avoided sex to ensure he was ritually pure and able to receive prophecy at any moment. According to Maimonides, though, sexual pleasure is a distraction which is incompatible with the intellectual focus needed for high-level prophecy. No other prophet separated from his wife; only Moses had this high level of prophecy. This is not actually an ascetic view towards sexuality; rather it was a one-off exception.
Maimonides permits a married couple to engage in nearly any form of sexual activity, but praises one who limits sexual activity to the minimum necessary:
A man's wife is permitted to him. Therefore, a man may do whatever he desires with his wife... Nevertheless, it is pious conduct for a person not to act frivolously concerning such matters, and to sanctify himself at the time of relations, as explained in Hilchot Deot. He should not depart from the ordinary pattern of the world. For this act was solely for the sake of procreation... Our Sages do not derive satisfaction from a person who engages in sexual relations excessively and frequents his wife like a rooster. This reflects a very blemished ; it is the way underdeveloped people conduct themselves. Instead, everyone who minimizes his sexual conduct is praiseworthy, provided he does not neglect his conjugal duties, without the consent of his wife.
Nahmanides went further, writing that "sexual relations are remote and disgusting according to the Torah, except for the perpetuation of the human species".
According to Raabad, there are four permitted "kavvanot" (intentions) for a man's sexual relations which receive Divine reward: for procreation, for welfare of the fetus, to fulfill a wife's desire, and that he relieves his lust through intercourse with his wife rather than in a forbidden manner. Yet the last one is a lesser reward, since the man should have had the strength to resist. If he does not show any strength, and has sex anytime he wants, this would not be rewarded. Although sex would not be rewarded by Heaven in this last case but it is not forbidden either.
Forbidden sexual acts in Judaism
Isurei bi'ah
Main article: Forbidden relationships in JudaismThe term isurei bi'ah (Hebrew איסורי ביאה) refers to those one may not have intercourse with. The most serious of these form a subset known as arayot (Hebrew: עריות), based on the word erva ("nakedness") in Leviticus 18:6. Intercourse with arayot is one of the few acts in Judaism which one may not perform even to save one's life. The term erva is also used to describe parts of a woman considered to be immodest and sexually provocative, including hair, thighs, and singing voice.
Arayot include:
- Incestuous relations
- Male-male anal intercourse
- Bestiality
- Sex with a Jewish woman during her menstrual period (known as niddah)
Other isurei bi'ah include:
- Sexual intercourse between Jews and Gentiles
- Divorcees or female converts with Kohanim (priests)
- Mamzerim (offspring of adulterous unions) with regular Jews
When two people are forbidden from having sex together, the laws of negiah prohibit them from engaging in lesser sexual touch (including hugging and kissing), while the laws of yichud prohibit them from spending time together in private in a manner that would allow them to have sex undetected. These prohibitions do not apply in certain situations where sexual relationships are unlikely, for example among close family members.
Homosexuality
Main article: Homosexuality and JudaismThe traditional view is that the Torah forbids anal intercourse between two males (i.e. sodomy), and this is the view of Orthodox Judaism, based on Leviticus 18:22: "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind; it is abomination." Rabbinic sources extend this prohibition to all other sexual acts between two men, which are prohibited similar to how they would be prohibited between an unmarried man and woman.
There is no explicit ban on female-female intercourse in the Hebrew Bible, but it is similarly condemned in later rabbinical halakhic texts.
Classical rabbinic sources also condemn marriage between two men, which they see as an activity performed by non-Jews which invited Divine punishment.
Some medieval Jewish authors wrote fiction and poetry which portrayed homosexual love positively, though often these seem to be adaptations of a style found in contemporary Arabic poetry, unlikely to be based on real-life love affairs. These narratives are not intended as literal accounts, instead conveying a more symbolic message.
In Liberal Judaism (United Kingdom), homosexual relationships are considered acceptable, and weddings are conducted for same-sex couples. This is also true for several other liberal Jewish denominations.
Extramarital sex
Extramarital sex is frowned upon by all Jewish groups, even though its legal meaning is not always obvious; according to some authorities, it falls under a biblical prohibition. Traditionally and according to Torah adultery is only defined by sex involving a married woman; a married man do not commit adultery if he has sex with an unmarried woman. Some contemporary thinkers conjecture that the written Torah never explicitly forbids sex outside the context of marriage, with the exception of adultery and incest, however, most authorities understand it to be explicit in Deuteronomy 23:18, "No Israelite woman shall be a prostitute". According to Exodus 22:15–16, the man who entices a single woman to have sex must offer to marry her afterwards or the equivalent in compensation, unless her father refuses to allow him. This law is only for virginal women, as their value in the marriage market, as it were, decreases. Therefore, the man must either offer to marry her or pay for her lesser value, as it were, in a marriage market that highly values virginity.
Masturbation
Main article: Judaism and masturbationDespite not having been prohibited in the Torah in the form of an explicit commandment, the Halakha and the Oral Torah view male masturbation as a Halakhic prohibition and a great sin, deriving it as a biblical prohibition from Genesis 38:7. The attitude towards a male sperm is one of a potential future living human being, and thus, masturbation is referred to as morally, though not legally, similar to murder, in that the masturbator is exterminating his potential offspring. Kabbalistic literature declared the act of masturbation to be a major sin.
Female masturbation is less frowned upon, and indeed very rarely mentioned in any Jewish text.
In modern days, the Halakhic question on whether taking male semen for the purpose of medical examinations or insemination is a sin remains in dispute among Jewish legal authorities.
Many Ashkenazi authorities allowed for a married man to - under certain specific circumstances - ejaculate outside his wife's body as part of their sexual relations together, following a text by Moses Isserles in his comments on the Shulkhan Arukh.
Sexual fantasy
See also: Technology Awareness Group, Atzat Nefesh, and Religious views on pornography § JudaismThe halakhic literature discusses the prohibitions of hirhur (lit. thought) and histaklut (lit. gazing). Many of the practices of tzniut (modesty) serve to prevent these prohibitions from occurring.
Pornography
See also: Religious views on pornography and Religious views on masturbationPornography is not explicitly mentioned in any halakhic texts, but it is prohibited by many halakhic laws. The first of these laws are the laws of tzniut, or modesty. Acting in a pornographic film breaks the rules of modesty by exposing one's naked body. Additionally, those involved in the production of these films (even those who are not being filmed) are breaking the laws of tzniut by looking upon those in a sexually compromised position. The second set of halakhic laws prohibiting the production of pornography are those surrounding extramarital sex. Although extramarital relations were prevalent in the Torah, rabbis of the Talmudic period outlawed extramarital sex. Therefore, sexual intercourse between two unmarried porn actors would be prohibited by halakha. Finally, pornography is prohibited by halakhic laws surrounding masturbation, with which it over goes hand-in-hand. Not only is the viewing of pornographic content forbidden by these laws, but so is the production of pornographic content. The Kitzur Shulchan Arukh prohibits the spilling of seed, thus forbidding that a man engage in sexual intercourse without the intention to conceive. This not only prohibits men from creating pornographic content with a partner or partners, but also from creating solo content. Women, in slight contrast, have no such command to not spill seed, and thus the laws of masturbation do not prohibit them from creating pornographic content. Ultimately, however, people of all genders are prohibited from producing or consuming porn because of the laws of tzniut.
While pornography is specifically prohibited by halakhic texts, modern rabbinic responsum have mixed opinions on the subject. For example, it has been argued by some Orthodox rabbis that consuming pornography is the equivalent of having extramarital relations. Contrastingly, some Reform rabbis suggest that the consumption of erotic material could benefit marital relations. Contemporary rabbis within and between the denominations of Judaism have not come to a consensus as to whether or not pornography is acceptable in the modern age.
Sexual practices and culture
The Talmud says that a man cannot force his wife into having sex. The Talmud also claims that rebellious children will come from people who conceive a child in certain ways, including if a woman has sex out of fear of her husband, if either one is drunk, and if a woman is raped, along with other examples.
See also
- Jewish views on marriage
- Polyamory (see the section "Polyamory and religion")
- Religion and sexuality
- Tzniut (Modesty)
- Sexual violence during the Holocaust
References
- Baskin, Judith R. (2010). "Jewish Private Life: Gender, Marriage, and the Lives of Women". In Baskin, Judith R; Seeskin, Kenneth (eds.). The Cambridge Guide to Jewish History, Religion, and Culture. pp. 357–380. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511780899.016. ISBN 9780511780899. Retrieved 2019-02-14.
{{cite book}}
:|website=
ignored (help) - Seidman, Naomi. "Carnal Knowledge: Sex and the Body in Jewish Studies." Jewish Social Studies. New Series, Vol. 1, No. 1 (Autumn, 1994), pp. 115-146.
- ^ See Sefer haChinuch (Jerusalem: Rav Kook Institute, 1990), p. 55.
- Mishnah Yevamot 6:6
- Mishneh Torah Hilchot Ishut 15:2
- Judith Hauptman, Rereading the Rabbis, 130-149
- "Ba'alei Ha-Nefesh | Jewish Women's Archive". jwa.org. Retrieved 2019-02-28.
- מצוות עונה – חובת הבעל כלפי אשתו
- טבלת המצוות המלאה
- ^ Mishneh Torah, Issurei Biah, 21:9,11
- Mishneh Torah, Hilkhot Shabbat 30:14
- Leviticus 15:16–18; see also Tumah and taharah
- Aharon Lichtenstein, "Of Marriage: Relationship and Relations"
- Brachot 57b
- Eruvin 63b
- Niddah 31b
- Babylonian Talmud, Berakhot 62a
- Genesis Rabbah 9:7; see also Yoma 69b
- Iggeret Ha-Kodesh
- Assis, Yom Tov (1988). "Sexual behaviour in mediaeval Hispano-Jewish society". Jewish history: essays in honour of Chimen Abramsky. Halban. pp. 25–59. ISBN 9781870015196.
- Moshe Leaves His Wife and the Nature of Prophecy
- Nahmanides, commentary to Leviticus 18:6
- Raavad, Baalei Hanefesh, Shaar Hakedushah
- Marienberg, Evyatar (2019-01-01). "Evyatar Marienberg, "'Close Your Eyes and Think of These Four': Correct Thoughts During Sex According to an Important 12th Century Provençal Jewish Author", The Medieval Magazine 121 (February 2019), pp. 70-79". The Medieval Magazine.
- Leviticus 18
- "Translations and interpretations of Leviticus 18:22; all views". www.religioustolerance.org. Retrieved 19 June 2019.
- Babylonian Talmud Sanhedrin 54a and b; Josephus, Against Apion 2.199; and Philo, Abraham 135. Some modern authors stating this view include Alter (2004), p. 623, 632; Boyarin (1995), p. 339, 343; Brooten (1996), p. 61; Cohen (1990), p. 6; Daube (1986), p. 447; Milgrom (2000), p. 1568; Olyan (1994), p. 185; Thurston (1990), p. 16; and Walsh (2001), p. 208.
- Brodsky (2009).
- Yonatan Rosensweig, התמודדות מקראית פרשנית הלכתית ומחשבתית עם משכב זכר
- Maimonides' Mishneh Torah, Book of Kedushah, Issurei Biah, 21:8; "Issurey Bi'ah - Perek 21 - איסורי ביאה - פרק כא". www.chabad.org (in Hebrew).
- Chullin 92a-b; Genesis Rabbah 26:5
- Biale, David (1997). Eros and the Jews : from biblical Israel to contemporary America. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0520211346. OCLC 36681737.
- Decter, Jonathan (September 2011). "A Hebrew "sodomite" tale from thirteenth-century Toledo: Jacob Ben El'azar's story of Sapir, Shapir, and Birsha". Journal of Medieval Iberian Studies. 3 (2): 187–202. doi:10.1080/17546559.2011.610176. ISSN 1754-6559. S2CID 159695995.
- Raymond P. Scheindlin, "A Miniature Anthology of Medieval Hebrew Love Poems", Prooftexts, Vol. 5, No. 2 (MAY 1985), pp. 105-135
- BBC Religions, "Liberal Judaism"
- Benjamin Cohen, "Liberal Judaism launches gay marriage ceremonies in Britain", Pink News 25 Nov 2005
- 5 Questions with Professor Michael D. Coogan Archived 2011-09-19 at the Wayback Machine The Summit, October 19, 2010. New URL: http://admin2.collegepublisher.com/se/the-summit/opinion/5-questions-with-professor-michael-d-coogan-1.1716380 Archived 2011-09-19 at the Wayback Machine . Quote: "In ancient Israel, premarital sex by a woman was discouraged because in the patriarchal society of that time, a daughter was her father's property. If she was not a virgin, her value--the bride price her father would get from a prospective husband--was diminished. Also, any child born to an unmarried woman would be fatherless--the Biblical term is "orphan"-- and so, without either a male protector or any possibility of an inheritance, which was passed from father to son. There is no explicit prohibition in the Old Testament of premarital or extramarital sex by men, except for adultery, which meant having sex with another man's wife."
- ^ "Traditional Sources on Sex Outside Marriage - My Jewish Learning".
- "Sefer HaMitzvot, Negative Commandments 355:1". www.sefaria.org. Retrieved 2023-04-16.
- Maimonides, Rabbi Moses. "Mishneh Torah, Negative Mitzvot 355".
- "Strong's Number 6601 Hebrew Dictionary of the Old Testament Online Bible with Strong's Exhaustive Concordance, Brown Driver Briggs Lexicon, Etymology, Translations Definitions Meanings & Key Word Studies - Lexiconcordance.com". lexiconcordance.com.
- Broyde, Michael J. (22 August 2005). Marriage, Sex and Family in Judaism. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. p. 96. ISBN 978-1-4616-3996-1.
- Maimonides stated that the Tanakh does not explicitly prohibit masturbation, see Maimonides, Commentary to the Mishnah, Sanhedrin 7:4, apud Dorff, Elliot N. (2003) . "Chapter Five. Preventing Pregnancy". Matters of life and death : a Jewish approach to modern medical ethics (First paperback ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Jewish Publication Society. p. 117. ISBN 978-0827607682. OCLC 80557192.
Jews historically shared the abhorrence of male masturbation that characterized other societies. Although the prohibition was not debated, legal writers had difficulty locating a biblical base for it, and no less an authority than Maimonides claimed that it could not be punishable by the court because there was not an explicit negative commandment forbidding it.
- Patton, Michael S. (June 1985). "Masturbation from Judaism to Victorianism". Journal of Religion and Health. 24 (2): 133–146. doi:10.1007/BF01532257. ISSN 0022-4197. PMID 24306073. S2CID 39066052.
Nevertheless, there is no legislation in the Bible pertaining to masturbation.
- Kwee, Alex W.; David C. Hoover (2008). "Theologically-Informed Education about Masturbation: A Male Sexual Health Perspective" (PDF). Journal of Psychology and Theology. 36 (4): 258–269. doi:10.1177/009164710803600402. ISSN 0091-6471. S2CID 142040707. Retrieved 12 November 2011.
The Bible presents no clear theological ethic on masturbation, leaving many young unmarried Christians with confusion and guilt around their sexuality.
- Williams, Daniel K. (2013). "5. Sex and the Evangelicals: Gender Issues, the Sexual Revolution, and Abortion in the 1960s". In Schäfer, Axel R. (ed.). American Evangelicals and the 1960s. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press. p. 104. ISBN 978-0-299-29363-5. OCLC 811239040.
The leading evangelical sex advice books of the late 1940s had contained strong warnings against masturbation, placing it in the same category of such sexual sins as homosexuality and prostitution. Even in the early 1960s, some evangelical sexual advice books for teens still contained warnings about masturbation, but by the end of the decade, those warnings had disappeared, because evangelicals who noticed that the Bible said nothing directly about masturbation believed that they had made a mistake to proscribe it.
- Babylonian Talmud, Niddah 13a-b
- The Use of Cryopreserved Sperm and Pre-embryos In Contemporary Jewish Law and Ethics
- אין הלכה כיוחנן בן דהבאי
- Shulchan Aruch. pp. Even HaEzer, Siman 21–23.
- ^ "Judaism and Sex: Questions and Answers". My Jewish Learning. Retrieved 2023-04-25.
- "Eruvin 100b:14". www.sefaria.org. Retrieved 2019-03-17.
- "Nedarim 20b". www.sefaria.org. Retrieved 2019-03-17.
Works cited
- Alter, Robert (2004). The five books of Moses: a translation with commentary.
- Boyarin, Daniel (1995). "Are there any Jews in 'The History of Sexuality'?". Journal of the History of Sexuality. 5 (3).
- Brodsky, David (28 October 2009). "Sex in the Talmud: How to Understand Leviticus 18 and 20". In Drinkwater, Gregg; Lesser, Joshua; Shneer, David (eds.). Torah Queeries. New York University Press. pp. 157–169. doi:10.18574/nyu/9780814720127.003.0030. ISBN 978-0-8147-2012-7. Retrieved 26 January 2021.
- Brooten, Bernadette (1996). Love Between Women: Early Christian Responses to Female Homoeroticism.
- Cohen, Martin (1990). "The Biblical Prohibition of Homosexual Intercourse". Journal of Homosexuality. 19 (4): 3–20. doi:10.1300/J082v19n04_02. PMID 2230109.
- Daube, David (1986). "The Old Testament Prohibitions of Homosexuality". Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Romantische Abteilung. 103.
- Milgrom, Jacob (2000). Leviticus 17–22.
- Olyan, Saul M. (1994). ""And with a Male You Shall Not Lie the Lying down of a Woman": On the Meaning and Significance of Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13". Journal of the History of Sexuality. 5 (2): 179–206. ISSN 1043-4070. JSTOR 3704197. PMID 11639358.
- Thurston, Thomas (1990). "Leviticus 18:22 and the Prohibition of Homosexual Acts". In Stemmeler, Michael L.; Clark, J. Michael (eds.). Homophobia and the Judeo-Christian Tradition.
- Walsh, Jerome (2001). "Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13: Who Is Doing What To Whom?" (PDF). Journal of Biblical Literature. 120 (2): 201–209. doi:10.2307/3268292. JSTOR 3268292. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-01-04. Retrieved 2023-01-01.Also available
Further reading
- Shmuley Boteach, Kosher Sex, Harmony, 1998.
- Rabbi Lisa J. Grushcow, The Sacred Encounter: Jewish Perspectives on Sexuality, CCAR Press, 2014, ISBN 9780881232035.
- Seymour Hoffman, Standards of Sexual Modesty, Gender Separation and Homosexuality: Rabbinic and Psychological Views, Mondial, 2020, ISBN 9781595694010.
- Evyatar Marienberg, Traditional Jewish Sex Guidance: A History, Brill, 2022
External links
- Judaism and sexuality, for an additional in depth reading on the matter; "My Jewish Learning" - Article
- The Journal of Halacha: Artificial Insemination.
- Aish.com: Spirituality: My personal struggles with homosexuality Archived 2012-01-21 at the Wayback Machine.
- Wiley Online Library: Kosher medicine and medicalized halacha: An exploration of triadic relations among Israeli rabbis, doctors, and infertility patients.
- American Reform responsa: Collected responsa of the Central Conference of American Rabbis.
- jewishwomenshealth.org: Expulsion of Semen (Hotza'at Zera Levatalah);
Halakha (Jewish religious law) | |
---|---|
Ethics | |
Ritual purity | |
Modesty | |
Agrarian laws | |
Halakhic principles |
|
Punishment | |
Related boxes |
Women in Judaism | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
General topics |
| ||||||
Life cycle events |
| ||||||
Practices and concepts |
| ||||||
Organizations |
| ||||||
Places | |||||||