| Revision as of 21:29, 28 September 2006 editByrgenwulf (talk | contribs)1,234 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:22, 21 March 2023 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,669,042 editsm Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <center> (1x)Tag: Fixed lint errors | ||
| (141 intermediate revisions by 56 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| ] contains earlier material from the talk page; June 2006 -- September 2006. ] <small>(])</small> 22:30, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | ] contains earlier material from the talk page; June 2006 -- September 2006. ] <small>(])</small> 22:30, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ] contains earlier material from the talk page; September 2006 -- January 2007. ] <small>(])</small> 23:33, 27 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] contains earlier material from the talk page; January 2007 -- October 2007. ] <small>(])</small> 17:22, 21 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ''Please'' post new comments to the bottom of the talk page; I will almost always respond to comments on this page itself (makes comments easier to find -- I encourage you to do the same) so check back! ] <small>(])</small> 22:56, 4 April 2006 (UTC) | ''Please'' post new comments to the bottom of the talk page; I will almost always respond to comments on this page itself (makes comments easier to find -- I encourage you to do the same) so check back! ] <small>(])</small> 22:56, 4 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| <s>After a couple of months contributing to wikipedia in various ways, I've found that it's no longer as much fun as before. I've decided to go on an extended wikibreak, and I wish everyone luck. ] <small>(])</small> 01:02, 16 February 2006 (UTC)</s> <s>I'm back, and working on ] again. I still have a great deal of faith in the wikipedia project. ] <small>(])</small> 22:54, 4 April 2006 (UTC)</s> I have gone on another break; please see my user page for more discussion of this issue. ] <small>(])</small> 18:02, 27 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for the note — I feel quite the same, actually. Completely demoralised — when I sat down earlier to do some work I battled, because I kept on thinking of this discussion and trying to force myself to stay away and not feed the flames. | |||
| ==]== | |||
| I similarly apologise for being condescending (and I have). I actually wholeheartedly agree that the article needs something on Lorentz invariance violations (arguments pro and contra), just maybe not quite as it was — we've certainly, between us, dug up enough ''concrete'' citations to do it properly. Removing your paragraph entirely was perhaps a mistake: the better thing would have been to change it. But I haven't the time at the moment, and am ''so'' impatient with the situation here that I just deleted (although ye gods this little discussion has taken enough time that the whole article could have been rewritten properly!). | |||
| Don't turn this into an ]. Please explain your wikilinking of ], in contradiction to Misplaced Pages standards for ] to an article which do not ]. Do you honestly think there will ever be a Misplaced Pages article with that title? And please start using appropriate ]. Thank you. ] 16:09, 27 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I reverted my deletion after finding a new article for the wikilink. What I find ironic and even mystifying, is that you wrote an essay for Misplaced Pages on resolving conflict, yet you decided to deal with this issue by making a personal attack ("grumpy person") rather than providing adequate edit summaries which could have avoided the confusion in the first place. ] 17:12, 27 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Come on Ward; you were being grumpy, and I called you on it. Now that I've created the article, I don't anticipate further conflict. ] <small>(])</small> 17:17, 27 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Flagged revs == | |||
| Thanks for your nice note. I hope the idea is dead, but I'm afraid that the next Seigenthaler-style hoohah will push it through. Anyway, nice to know that somebody besides Larry Sanger reads the blog! ] 19:50, 15 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Multiple Theories == | |||
| If you wish to amuse yourself (and possibly me) by sharing your hypotheses, you are welcome to email me as (all one word, no caps or spaces) at btinternet.com ] (]) 17:18, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disputed fair use rationale for Image:2005riot shooting.jpg== | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at ] carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at ] is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. | |||
| If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->] (]) 04:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Fair use rationale for Image:Brattlebororeformer.gif== | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. You've indicated that the image meets Misplaced Pages's ], but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to ] and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at ]. | |||
| Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. ] (]) 14:11, 22 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Image:Stonewalldb.gif listed for deletion == | |||
| An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:Idw --> ] (]) 17:39, 2 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ''Ichthus'': January 2012 == | |||
| <div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> | |||
| {| style="text-align:center; border:10px solid black; background-color:black; width:100%;" | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |- padding:15em;padding-top:5em;" | |||
| |style="font-size: 350%; color:gold; "|<br>'''<big>I</big>CHTHUS''' <br><br> | |||
| |- padding:15em;padding-top:5em;" | |||
| |style="color:gold;"|'''January 2012''' | |||
| |} | |||
| <div style="background-color:#FFF; font-size: 120%;font-weight:bold;"> | |||
| ''In this issue...'' <br /> | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| </div> | |||
| ----- | |||
| <div class="center"><small>''Ichthus'' is the newsletter of Christianity on Misplaced Pages • It is published by ]<br>For submissions contact the ] • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list ]</small></div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- EdwardsBot 0237 --> | |||
| == ]: ] == | |||
| Hi - an article you contributed to has been nominated for deletion. Feel free to comment. Thanks, ] (]) 08:41, 13 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691963760 --> | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> —]_] 14:41, 3 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| I am not even a mindless defender of loops. ''Simp'' — I wouldn't bet on it being right. ''Sal'' — I wouldn't bet on string theory, either. I know the theory has lots of problems, but I just don't think that the Lorentz violation thing is one of them (although, of course, maybe there ''is'' some breaking of Lorentz invariance waiting to be discovered, and it isn't a "problem"). At the moment, I don't care. But I'm glad we can draw this to a fairly amicable close. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ''']''' (]) 23:53, 29 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| I am replying here because I shall be archiving my own talk page anon. Remove this as well, when you have read it, if that's what you want. ] 21:29, 28 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:22, 21 March 2023
archive contains earlier material from the talk page; August 2005 -- February 2006. Sdedeo (tips) 20:11, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
archive2 contains earlier material from the talk page; March 2006 -- June 2006. Sdedeo (tips) 23:43, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
archive3 contains earlier material from the talk page; June 2006 -- September 2006. Sdedeo (tips) 22:30, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
archive4 contains earlier material from the talk page; September 2006 -- January 2007. Sdedeo (tips) 23:33, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
archive5 contains earlier material from the talk page; January 2007 -- October 2007. Sdedeo (tips) 17:22, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Please post new comments to the bottom of the talk page; I will almost always respond to comments on this page itself (makes comments easier to find -- I encourage you to do the same) so check back! Sdedeo (tips) 22:56, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
General intelligence factor
Don't turn this into an edit war. Please explain your wikilinking of The g Factor: General Intelligence and Its Implications, in contradiction to Misplaced Pages standards for links to an article which do not add content or meaning. Do you honestly think there will ever be a Misplaced Pages article with that title? And please start using appropriate edit summaries. Thank you. Ward3001 16:09, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- I reverted my deletion after finding a new article for the wikilink. What I find ironic and even mystifying, is that you wrote an essay for Misplaced Pages on resolving conflict, yet you decided to deal with this issue by making a personal attack ("grumpy person") rather than providing adequate edit summaries which could have avoided the confusion in the first place. Ward3001 17:12, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- Come on Ward; you were being grumpy, and I called you on it. Now that I've created the article, I don't anticipate further conflict. Sdedeo (tips) 17:17, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Flagged revs
Thanks for your nice note. I hope the idea is dead, but I'm afraid that the next Seigenthaler-style hoohah will push it through. Anyway, nice to know that somebody besides Larry Sanger reads the blog! Casey Abell 19:50, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Multiple Theories
If you wish to amuse yourself (and possibly me) by sharing your hypotheses, you are welcome to email me as (all one word, no caps or spaces) at btinternet.com Myopic Bookworm (talk) 17:18, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:2005riot shooting.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:2005riot shooting.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Brattlebororeformer.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Brattlebororeformer.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Misplaced Pages's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:11, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Image:Stonewalldb.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Stonewalldb.gif, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 17:39, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Ichthus: January 2012
 |
ICHTHUS |
| January 2012 |
In this issue...
- From the Editor
- What are You doing For Lent?
- Fun and Exciting Contest Launched
- Spotlight on WikiProject Catholicism
Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Misplaced Pages • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
2nd nomination for deletion: Heim theory
Hi - an article you contributed to has been nominated for deletion. Feel free to comment. Thanks, Maschen (talk) 08:41, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Quis-ego for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quis-ego is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Quis-ego until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —me_and 14:41, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of New Wittgenstein for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Wittgenstein is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/New Wittgenstein until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 23:53, 29 March 2017 (UTC)