Misplaced Pages

Pretender: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:46, 29 September 2006 edit195.93.21.7 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:32, 6 November 2024 edit undoDiscospinster (talk | contribs)Administrators464,281 editsm Reverted edits by 142.134.229.6 (talk) (HG) (3.4.12)Tags: Huggle Rollback 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Someone who claims to be rightful holder of a throne that is vacant or held by another}}
{{otheruses1|"pretender" as applied to a ]}}
{{About|the term "pretender" as applied to monarchies|other uses}}
{{Order of Succession (Pretender)}}
{{More citations needed|date=August 2024}}
A '''Pretender''' is a claimant to an abolished or already occupied ].<ref>Note that the French word ''prétend'', a source of the English word "pretend", simply means "claim", with no implication of falsity, and that for the present purpose the English word retains the sense of the French word and not the modern English definition. In the context of the modern languages, they are, therefore, ]s, because the two words have noticeably different meanings in the two languages despite being almost identical (except for the ] in the former, bearing in mind that ] has adopted the use of diacritical marks only since the ]). Therefore a ''pretender'', whether to a throne or anything, as the phrase meant in the past, is simply a claimant. Indeed in the cases of pretenders to a throne, they would not be a serious problem if there were no hint of validity to the claim. Contrariwise, persons with a potential claim to a throne automatically become ''pretenders'', whether they press their claim or not, and this has led such persons to take extraordinary measures, such as emigrating to a foreign country under an assumed name, to preserve their safety against threats from other claimants or their allies.</ref> ] are not seen as pretenders, as the term only applies to those who have ''never'' occupied the throne. The ] equivalent is the ].


], later known as the ''Old Pretender'', depicted {{circa|1703}}, having been recognised in 1701 by King ] as the rightful claimant to the English, Irish, and Scottish thrones]]
== Modern pretenders ==
A '''pretender''' is someone who claims to be the rightful ruler of a country although not recognized as such by the current government.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151114002310/http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/american/pretender#pretender_4 |date=2015-11-14 }}, ''MacMillian Dictionary''. "someone who claims to be the true king, queen, or leader of a country, when another person holds this position."</ref> The term may often be used to either refer to a descendant of a deposed monarchy or a claim that is not legitimate.<ref name=curley>Curley Jr., Walter J. P. ''Monarchs-in-Waiting''. New York, 1973, pp. 4, 10. {{ISBN|0-396-06840-5}}.</ref><ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210624200847/https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pretender |date=2021-06-24 }}, ''Merriam-Webster'', "a claimant to a throne who is held to have no just title."<br>"pretender", ''Oxford English Dictionary'', 2nd edition, Oxford Dictionaries, 1989. "applied to a claimant who is held to have no just title."</ref>
{| border="2" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" style="margin: 1em 1em 1em 0; border: 1px #aaa solid; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 95%;"
! rowspan=1 valign="top" |
State
! rowspan=1 solid black;" valign="top" |
Pretender
! rowspan=1 solid black;" valign="top" |
Link to Past Monarchy
|-
| ]
| ], Crown Prince of Albania
| only son of ], last ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| descendant of ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| son of ], last ]
|-
| ]
| Archduke ], Crown Prince of Austria and Hungary
| eldest son of ], last ] and ]. Otto "renounced" his claim in order to pass freely into Austria, however, he continues to act (and is supported) as Head of the House of ]. Some royalists maintain that his renunciation had no validity and that the republican government in Austria is an illegitimate successor to the empire.
|-
| ]
| ]
| senior male-line descendant of ], ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| great-grandson of ], last ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| senior male-line descendant of ], last ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| head of the Vassouras branch of the descendants of ], last ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| head of the ], and thus heir to ] the last ], which reigned over Burma until 1886
|-
| ]
| ]
| daughter of ] ]
|-
| ]
| Crown Prince ]
| son of ], only ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| son of ], descendant of the ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| son of ], titular ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| grandson of ], last ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| grandson of ], elected but never reigned as ]
|-
| ]
| ] (])
| senior male-line descendant of ], last ]
|-
| ]
| ] (])
| senior male-line descendant of ], ]
|-
| ]
| ] (], ])
| senior male-line descendant of ], younger brother of ]
|-
| ]
| ] (Bonapartist, ])
| female-line descendant of ], younger brother of ]
|-
| ] and ]
| ]
| descendant of ], last ] and ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| head of the ] line which branched off from the ] in the 16th century but still claims the ]
|-
| ], ], and ]
| ] (])
| senior descendant of ]
|-
| ] and ]
| Statutory monarchy and republic.
| See discussion below.
|-
| ] and ]
| ]
| Head of the ] which ruled Hanover as Kings until ]; Brunswick-Lunenburg as Dukes until ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| senior of the remaining relatives of ] ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| descendant of ] ]
|-
| ] and ]
| ]
| descendant of ] ], adopted son of ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| descendant of ]; the ] line claimed ] following the death of the last prince, ], in 1869.
|-
| ]
| ]
| grandson of the last ] ]
|-
| ]
| ], Crown Prince of Iran
| son of the last ], ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| heir presumptive of the ]; descendant of ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| head of the ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| cousin of the last ], ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| son of the last ], ]
|-
<!---- | ]
| ]
| descendant of ], declared Head of the Italian royal house by the ''Council of the Senators of the Kingdom'', alledges that the ]' marriage was non-dynastic
|- ---->
| ]
| ]
| descendant of the last Tenno of ] (the Southern Dynasty)
|-
| ]
| ]
| son of ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| ]'s adopted son; descendant of ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| grandson of the last king, ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| son of ], last ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| son of ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| grandson of ], titular ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| son of Sultan ] who ruled from 1935 till 1943.
|-
| ]
| ]
| only surviving brother of ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| heir-representative of the Margraves of Brandenburg, to whom Mecklenburg would have passed on the extinction of the house
|-
| ]
| ]
| morganatic descendant of ]; bears a ducal title of Russian creation; allegedly recognized as a dynast.
|-
| ]
| ]
| descendant of ], who was the grandson of ] ] and the adopted son of the Habsburg ], ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| since 1978 Pretender to the Miskito Kingdom and hereditary chief of the Miskito Nation
|-
| ]
| ]
| head of the ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| descendant of ], last ]
|-
| ]
| ] ]
| descendent of ] last Mughal emperor, he is accepted as head of the ] by the ] government
|-
| ]
| ]
| grandson of ], last ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| grandson of ], ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| grandson of ], ]
|-
| ]
| ], ]
| great-grandson of ], ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| head of the house of ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| descendant of ], ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| descendant of ], ]
|-
| ]
| ] ]
| grandson of ], ] of Sarawak
|-
| ]
| ]
| grandson of ], last ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| descendant of ], ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| grandson of ], last ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| grandson of ], last ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| great-nephew of ], last Prince of Schaumburg-Lippe
|-
| ]
| ]
| senior male agnate of the ].
|-
| ] and ]
| ]
| son of ], last ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| son of ], last ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| descendant of ], ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| senior male-line descendant of ], last ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| senior male-line descendant of ], ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| descendant of ], ]
|-
| ]
| many
| The Catholic Church has experienced over 25 ] in 2000 years, the oddest circumstance being the so-called "]" (1378-1417) when up to three men simultaneously claimed to be pope with sizeable portions of clergy and laity supporting each of them. Since the Second Vatican Council in 1965, a few Catholics believe that Popes could not have allowed such changes in the Church and reject post-Vatican II popes, considering them illegitimate. Among these many ], a few have gone so far as to take it upon themselves to elect one.
|-
| ]
| Crown Prince ]
| son of ], last ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| grandson of ], last ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| senior male-line descendant of ], ]
|-
| ]
| ]
| son of ], last ]
|}


In addition, it may also refer to that of a deposed monarch, a type of claimant referred to as ].<ref>''Almanach de Gotha'' uses the "head of the house" terminology. It lists Karl von Habsburg as "Head of the Imperial House of Austria". It lists many others in the form "head of the royal house of ". (James, John. ''Almanach de Gotha'' 2016: Volume I Parts I & II) The classic {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221021114354/https://www.russianlegitimist.org/almanach-de-gotha|date=2022-10-21}} uses "chef de la maison" (p. 104).</ref> In addition, it may also refer to a former monarchy.
== Pretenders in the Roman Empire ==
] knew many pretenders to the office of ], especially during the ], the ] ran exceptionally thick.


] popularized this word, using it to refer to her Roman Catholic half-brother ], the ] heir, in an address to Parliament in 1708: "The French fleet sailed from Dunkirk ... with the Pretender on board."<ref>"pretender", ''Oxford English Dictionary'', 2nd edition, Oxford Dictionaries, 1989. Stuart had earlier been referred to as "the pretended prince of Wales".</ref>
These are customarily referred to as the ], which was an allusion to the ] at ] some five hundred years earlier; although the number is questionable, and the Romans were separate aspirants, not (as the Athenians were) a Committee of Public Safety. The ] translation of the appropriate chapter of the ] therefore represents the Latin ''triginta tyranni'' by "Thirty Pretenders" to avoid this artificial and confusing parallel. Not all of them were afterwards considered ''pretenders''; several were actually successful in becoming Emperor (at least in part of the Empire), although most of those were slain after holding the office for a brief period.


In 1807 the French Emperor ] complained that the '']'' continued to list German princes whom he had deposed.<ref>Napoleon wrote to his foreign minister, 20 October 1807: "Monsieur de Champagny, this year's ''Almanach de Gotha'' is badly done. I protest. There should be more of the French Nobility I have created and less of the German Princes who are no longer sovereign. Furthermore, the Imperial Family of Bonaparte should appear before all other royal dynasties, and let it be clear that we and not the Bourbons are the House of France. Summon the Minister of the Interior of Gotha at once so that I personally may order these changes."</ref> This episode established that publication as the pre-eminent authority on the titles of deposed monarchs and nobility, many of which were restored in 1815 after the end of Napoleon's reign.
==The Byzantine Empire==
Disputed successions to the Empire continued at ]. Most seriously, after the fall of Constantinople to the ] in 1204, and its eventual recovery by ], there came to be three Bysantine successor states, each of which claimed to be the Roman Empire, and several Latin claimants (including the ] and the houses of ] and ]) to the ] the Crusaders had set up in its place. There were sometimes multiple claimants to some of the inheritances, as well.


== Cypriot pretenders== == Etymology ==
The noun "pretender" is derived from the French verb ''prétendre,''<ref>Larousse, Dictionnaire de la langue francaise, "Lexis", Paris, 1979, p. 1494, ''prétendre à quelque chose = aspirer à l'obtenir''</ref> itself derived from the Latin ''praetendere'' ("to stretch out before", "to hold before (as a pretext)",<ref>''Cassell's Latin Dictionary'', Marchant, J.R.V, & Charles, Joseph F., (Eds.), Revised Edition, 1928, p. 436</ref> "to extend before"<ref>''' {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230130050239/https://www.ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=pretend |date=2023-01-30 }}''', ''The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language,'' Fifth Edition, 2020. "."</ref>), from the verb ''tendo'' ("to stretch"),<ref>''Cassell's Latin Dictionary'', Marchant, J.R.V, & Charles, Joseph F., (Eds.), Revised Edition, 1928, p. 569</ref> plus the preposition ''prae'' ("before, in front").<ref>''Cassell's Latin Dictionary'', Marchant, J.R.V, & Charles, Joseph F., (Eds.), Revised Edition, 1928, p. 429</ref> The English, French and Latin words have ''prima facie'' no pejorative connotation,<ref>" {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220503193557/https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/french-english/pretendant |date=2022-05-03 }}," ''Global French–English Dictionary,'' 2018, "''personne qui cherche à épouser''" (a suiter).</ref> although one who pretends to a position with no plausible claim or with an entirely false claim, may be differentiated as a "false pretender", see for example ].
Following the defeat and death of King Jacques III of Cyprus in 1474, his younger and illegitimate brother, ] (c1485-1523) had moved to Sicily, then Malta. He was acknowledged as Heir to Cyprus, Armenia, Jerusalem and Antioch, though never took it seriously. From a genealogical point, ] was created a ] and worked as a ] and in ].


==Roman Empire==
== French pretenders ==
] knew many pretenders to the offices making up the title of ], especially during the ].
Following the death of the childless legitimist pretender "Henry V", ], grandson of King ] in the 1880s, the majority of French monarchists accepted the Comte's selection as heir, his distant relative, the Orleanist pretender, the ], grandson of King ] (who descends from King ]) as the pretender to the French throne. A small minority refused to accept this designation, and chose instead a descendant of Louis XIV and the Spanish line.


These are customarily referred to as the ], which was an allusion to the ] of ] some five hundred years earlier; although the comparison is questionable, and the Romans were separate aspirants, not (as the Athenians were) a Committee of Public Safety. The ] translation of the appropriate chapter of the ] therefore represents the Latin ''triginta tyranni'' by "Thirty Pretenders" to avoid this artificial and confusing parallel. Not all of them were afterwards considered ''pretenders''; several were actually successful in becoming emperor at least in part of the empire for a brief period.
The arguments are, on one side, that ] renounced any future claim to the French throne when he became King of Spain, and that the ] were therefore recognized as the next heirs before the ]. On the other side, that this renunciation was invalid and impossible, and (in some cases) that ] and Louis-Philippe forfeited any remaining right to the crown for disloyalty. Hence there are two pretenders to the French throne; though the ] pretender, the present ], is accepted by most French monarchists as ''the'' pretender, as the list above shows.


==Greek pretenders==
There is also a pretender to the imperial throne of France, in the person of ], descendant of the ].


===Byzantine Empire===
== Russian Pretenders ==
Successions to the ] long continued at ]. Most seriously, after the fall of Constantinople to the ] in 1204, and its eventual recovery by ], there came to be three Byzantine successor states, each of which claimed to be the Roman Empire, and several Latin claimants (including the ] and the houses of ] and ]) to the ] the Crusaders had set up in its place. At times, some of these states and titles were subjected to multiple claims.
There is much debate over who is the legitimate heir to the Russian throne. ], son of ], is considered by some to be the legitimate heir, being the grandson of a cousin of Czar ]. Unequal marriages have made tracking a legitimate heir to the Russian throne very difficult, and some believe there is no legitimate heir at all. ], the president of ], a junior male descendant of the imperial family, is regarded by some as the head of the family, but he is born of a ] and therefore not entitled to inherit the throne under strict Russian succession law. Those who impersonated the murdered daughters of Nicholas II were not pretenders to the throne, as women could not succeed to the Russian throne while a male dynast was alive. The last male dynast, ], did not die until ]. There was also a woman named ] who attempted to prove she was the lost daughter of ], ], but DNA testing on her alleged remains seemed to prove her claim false.


== English, Irish, Scottish, Welsh and British pretenders == ===Cypriot pretenders===
Following the defeat and death of King ] ] in 1474, his younger and illegitimate brother, Eugène Matteo de Lusignan, also styled ''d'Arménie'' (died 1523) removed to ], then to ]. He was acknowledged as rightful heir to the thrones of ], ], ], and ], although he never made serious efforts to pursue the claims. The title of "Barone de Baccari" was created in 1508 for Jacques Matteo (sives Eugene Matteo) d'Armenia with the remainder to his descendants in perpetuity.<ref>''Ladies of Medieval Cyprus and Caterina Cornaro'' by Leto Severis, Nicosia 1995; p. 152; {{ISBN|9963810217}}.</ref> Eugene, illegitimate son of King Jacques II of Cyprus, had, when his family were exiled, first gone to Naples, then Sicily, then settled on Malta, marrying a Sicilian heiress, '']na'' Paola Mazzara (a descendant of the Royal House of Aragon of Sicily and Aragon), with issue.<ref>Leto Severis, ''Ladies of Medieval Cyprus and Caterina Cornaro''; Nicosia: 1995; {{ISBN|9963810217}}.</ref>
Pretenders to the thrones of the United Kingdom and its predecessor realms, as well as the other historical jurisdictions that are modernly England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, were essentially taken care of by making the Irish and English (and subsequently, British) monarchies purely statutory institutions. Ireland further precluded any and all possible pretenders by declaring itself a republic in 1949.


===Modern Greece===
Prior to the ] of ], ] used a system of elective kingship. England originated, in fact, about the year ], as an amalgam of several kingdoms (], ], ], ], ], etc.) under the transnational leadership of ]. The ] (pronounced "WEE-tun-aye-yuh-mut" in Old English), had the final say in who would or would not be "King of all Engla Land."
The Norman Conquest eliminated elective kingship in England - for a few centuries - by replacing the Witegenot with the Norman institution known as the King's Council, while The Thing simply disappeared. Gradually, however, the Normans became English; and modern forms of the old Anglo-Saxon institutions began to re-emerge. To this day, the form of Coronation contains vestigial elements of the consent of the people. In time, the new "Parlement" began to re-assert its ancient predecessor's right to choose the king, culminating in an Act of 1649, without the Royal Assent of ], on the morning of his execution. However, the power is now held to be vested in the Crown in Parliament, so that an Act was necessary to effect the abdication of ] in 1936. It is arguable whether or not the Sovereign has the right to withhold either the Sovereign's Consent to consider such a Bill, or the Royal Assent to such an Act)


The claimant to the throne of the last Greek kingdom is ]. He belongs to the ], the senior branch of the ]. His designated heir is his son ].
The change was first noticeable in England following the accession of ], after a long period of strife and civil wars that began when ] deposed ]. When Henry drafted his deed of succession - naming, first, his son, Edward, to succeed him; then, his two daughters, Mary and Elizabeth, in birth order - he submitted the document to Parliament for approval. When the regents for Edward then tried to change the succession to skip the teenage king's sisters, in favour of his cousin ] - (in fact, Edward's cousin ] was the next heir after Elizbeth and before Jane) - Edward signed the document but it did not have the approval of Parliament. Jane is still counted England's first queen regnant, but she only reigned nine days before Mary Tudor arrived from Lincoln. Mary was instantly recognised as Queen without fuss or question.


==French pretenders==
Attempts to disrupt the statutory nature of the monarchy in England were made by some of the Stuart monarchs, who had not experienced the English checks on royal power when they ruled in Scotland. The ] took care of that problem, and the ] essentially extended the Act of Settlement to Scotland. The ] subsequently extended the Act of Settlement to Ireland, but the Irish monarchy had already been made a statutory institution when ] was named King of Ireland by the Irish Parliament in 1542. Previously, the English kings had been styled Lord of Ireland.
<!--"Pretenders to the throne of France" and "Pretenders to the French throne" link here (MOS:HIDDENLINKADVICE)-->
{{See also|English claims to the French throne}}


The establishment of the ] and the execution of ] in 1793 led to the king's son becoming pretender to the abolished throne, styled as ]. As Louis XVII was a child and imprisoned in Paris by the revolutionaries, his uncle, the ], proclaimed himself regent in his nephew's name. After Louis XVII died in 1795, the Comte de Provence became pretender himself, as Louis XVIII.
Nevertheless, there have been some great pretenders over the centuries. A few famous ones are noted here, and a few passive claims are still made.


Louis XVIII was restored to the throne in 1814, and was succeeded by his brother ] in 1824.<ref name=valyn>Valynseele, Joseph. ''Les Prétendants aux trônes d'Europe.'' Paris, 1967, pp. 11, 187–190 (French).</ref> Charles X was, however, forced into exile by the ]. Charles X and his son, ], abdicated their claims in favor of Charles's grandson, ]; however, their cousin the ], a descendant of Louis XIV's younger brother, mounted the throne as Louis Philippe I, King of the French.
] was the Roman Catholic son of the deposed King ], forever eclipsed in the succession to the throne by the ]. Notwithstanding the ], he claimed the separate thrones of Scotland, as James VIII, and of England and Ireland, as James III, until his death in 1766.


For most of the July Monarchy, the ]s, as supporters of the exiled senior line came to be known, were uncertain of whom to support. Some believed the abdication of Charles and his son legal, and recognized the young Chambord as king, while others maintained that abdication was unconstitutional in France of the '']'', and continued to recognize first Charles X and then Louis-Antoine, until the latter's death in 1844. On his uncle's death, Chambord claimed the crown, but lived in exile and upon his death in 1883, the direct male-line of Louis XV became extinct.
James's sons carried on their own claims. ], the would-be Charles III, still famously known as ''Bonnie Prince Charlie'', died in 1788. He is unquestionably the most famous pretender in British history, if not world history. His younger brother, ], took up the mantle after his death, if only symbolically, as the would-be Henry IX of England. He died in 1807.


In 1848, Louis Philippe was himself overthrown by the ], and abdicated the throne in favor of his young grandson, ]. However, a republic was proclaimed, leaving Paris, like his cousin Chambord, merely a pretender to a no longer existing crown.<ref name=valyn/> Over the next several decades, there were several attempts at a so-called "fusion", to unite both groups of monarchists in support of the childless Chambord as king, who would recognize the Count of Paris as his heir. Those efforts failed in the 1850s, but after the establishment of the ] in 1870, when a royalist majority was elected to the ], fusion again became the monarchist strategy. As a result, in 1873 the Count of Paris withdrew his own bid for the throne and recognized Chambord as legitimate pretender to the French crown.<ref name=valyn/> In spite of this apparent unity among royalist forces, ] of the monarchy was not to be; Chambord refused to accept the ] flag, which rendered him unacceptable to most Frenchmen as a ].<ref name=valyn/> The monarchists hoped that after Chambord's death they could unite and crown the ] candidate. But Chambord lived until 1883, while France's royalists had lost their majority in parliament by 1877.<ref name=valyn/> The erstwhile Orléanist ] thus called Chambord "The French Washington", i.e. the true "founder" of the Republic.
James VIII & III was commonly called "the King over the water", because he was resident in France (across the Channel) and is also known as ''The Old Pretender.'' (As no Jacobite monarch since has resided in Britain, Jacobites ever since have toasted 'the King/Queen over the water'.) Bonnie Prince Charlie is also called ''The Young Pretender.'' See ] and ] for more information including the current Jacobite "pretender".


By 1883 most French monarchists accepted the Count of Paris as head of royal house.<ref name=valyn/> A minority of reactionaries, the so-called ''Blancs d'Espagne'' ("Spanish Whites"), continued to withhold support from the ] and chose instead ], the ] pretender to the Spanish throne, who also happened to be the senior male descendant of ].<ref name=valyn/>
] (1349-1416) is probably the best-known Welsh pretender, though whether he was pretender or Prince of Wales depends upon your source of information. Officially, ], who died in 1282, was the last native and arguably greatest Prince of Wales. Since 1301, the Prince of Wales has been the eldest living son of the King or Queen Regnant of England (subsequently of Great Britain, 1707, and of United Kingdom, 1801). The word "living" is important. Upon the death of ], Henry VII invested his second son, the future Henry VIII, with the title. The title is not automatic, however, but merges into the Crown when a prince dies or accedes to the throne, and has to be re-conferred by the sovereign.


The arguments are, on one side, that Louis XIV's younger grandson, ] renounced any future claim to the French throne when he left France to become king of Spain as Philip V in 1700 (the renunciation was ratified internationally by the ]), ostensibly leaving the ] as heirs to the throne of France in the event of extinction of descendants of Louis XIV's elder grandson ], which occurred in 1883.<ref name=valyn/> On the other side, Anjou's renunciation is held to be invalid because prior to the revolution it was a fundamental tenet of the French monarchy that the crown could never be diverted from the rightful (]) heir of ].<ref name=valyn/> Moreover, although the Orléans volunteered to defer their rival claim to the throne after 1873, the ] vote of their ancestor ] in 1789 and the usurpation of Louis Philippe in 1830 are alleged to have extinguished all rights to the throne for the Orléans branch.<ref name=valyn/> The schism has continued to the present day, with supporters of the senior line reclaiming the title of "Legitimist", leaving their opponent royalists to be known, once again, as "Orléanists". The current representative of the senior line is ], the senior legitimate living descendant of Hugh Capet (and of Philip V ''d'Anjou'' of Spain) who was born and raised in Spain. The Orléanist line, which returned to live in France when the law of ] was repealed in 1950, is represented by ], senior male-line descendant of King Louis Philippe.
Nevertheless, it is Glyndŵr whom many remember as the last native Prince of Wales. He was indeed proclaimed Prince of Wales by his supporters on 16 September 1400, and his revolt in quest of Welsh independence was not quashed by ] until 1409. Later, however, one of Glyndŵr's cousins, Owain Tudor, would marry the widow of ], and their grandson would become ], from whom the current British monarch is descended (through his daughter Margaret Tudor, who was married off to ]). So, in a way, Glyndŵr might be said to have had the last laugh.


In addition to these two claims to the historic royal throne of France, there have also been pretenders to the imperial throne of France, created first by ] in 1804 and recreated by his nephew Emperor ] in 1852 (] 1870). This claim is today disputed between ] and his own father, the self-avowed republican Prince ] (deemed to be excluded from the succession due to a ] re-marriage), both descendants of Napoleon I's youngest brother, ].
The business of Irish pretenders is rather more complicated because of the nature of kingship in Ireland before the Norman take-over of 1171. In both Ireland and Scotland, succession to kingship was elective, often (if not usually) by contest, according to matrilineal descent. That is, the head of state of any kingdom, sub-kingdom, high kingdom, etc., was always a king, but the king always inherited the crown through his mother, as a ranking princess royal, not through his father. (See, e.g., ''The Lion in the North: A Personal View of Scotland's History'', by John Prebble ISBN 0-14-003652-0 ; among other works.)


==Russian pretenders==
Thus, you, as king, would not be succeeded by your own son but would normally be succeeded by your mother's other sons; then by your sisters' sons; then, your maternal aunt's sons; and so on, traveling through the female line of the royal house. This combination of male succession through matrilineal descent produced a cumbersome system under which the throne passed cyclically from brother to brother, then uncle to nephew, and then cousin to cousin, before starting over as brother to brother, uncle to nephew, etc. {See, e.g., ''The Lion in the North: A Personal View of Scotland's History'', by John Prebble; among other works.} In Ireland, however, the high king from the time of Maelsheachlainn I (died 862) exercised a measure of control over the country. He belonged to the Ui Neill dynasty and under the Brehon laws, succession was open to any kinsman up to and including second cousin. His dynasty is today represented by the O'Neill family who would regard their head as the pretender. The O Conor dynasty provided two high kings and the head of the family, the O Conor Don, would also be considered a pretender to the Irish throne. The descendants of Brian Boroimhe are represented by Lord Inchiquin, who is also regarded as a claimant. In addition, pretenders or claimants exist to the localised kingdoms of Breifne, Fermanagh, Tyrconnel and Leinster. The O'Neills would also be regarded as claimants to the throne of Aileach and Lord Inchiquin to the throne of Thomond.


There is much debate over who is the legitimate heir to the Russian throne, and bitter dispute within the family itself.<ref name=massie>Massie, Robert K. ''The Romanovs: The Final Chapter''. New York, 1995, p. 278. {{ISBN|0-394-58048-6}}.</ref> ] is considered by some to be the legitimate heir.<ref name="petit">de Badts de Cugnac, Chantal. Coutant de Saisseval, Guy. ''Le Petit Gotha''. Nouvelle Imprimerie Laballery, Paris 2002, p. 702 (French) {{ISBN|2-9507974-3-1}}</ref> She is the only child of ] who died in 1992, a great-grandson of ], whom some considered the last male ] of the ]. Some of her opponents believe she is ineligible to claim the throne because she was born of a marriage that would have been deemed ] under Russia's monarchy, which was abolished in 1917.<ref name=massie/> Others oppose her for reasons similar to those of the anti-Orleanist rationale: her grandfather's perceived disloyalty and dynastic ambition are seen as removing any rights which might otherwise have belonged to her branch of the former dynasty.
In Scotland, ] tried to get around this system by killing off all of the heirs between himself and his grandson, Duncan; except for Prince ] of Moray, who was just five years old at the time and - more importantly - was successfully rumoured to be half-witted (thus, he survived). ] did become king, but Lulach's step-father, Maelbeth -rendered "]" in English - successfully claimed the throne in his own right and on Lulach's behalf.


Still others maintain that the restrictive, ] of the Romanovs leave no one who can claim to be rightful heir to the dynasty's legacy. Others recognized ] as head of the family,<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.reburial.um.dk/en/menu/ReburialEvents/TheReburialCeremony/PresenceOfTheRomanovFamilyAtTheReburial/ | publisher = Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark | title = Presence of the Romanov Family at the Reburial | work = Reburial of Empress Maria Fedorovna, September 2006 | date = 12 September 2006 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20081207142647/http://www.reburial.um.dk/en/menu/ReburialEvents/TheReburialCeremony/PresenceOfTheRomanovFamilyAtTheReburial/ | archive-date = 7 December 2008}}</ref> being a descendant of Emperor ] and the elected president of the ], which consists of most living male-line descendants of the Romanov emperors. Neither he nor his younger brother, ], had sons and since their deaths no new claims have been advanced by this branch.
Duncan I's son, ] 'Canmore', ultimately returned from exile in England and took the throne from Maelbeth and Lulach (the latter reigning 1057-1058, after the death of Maelbeth in battle against Malcolm). Malcolm was succeeded by his brother, as Duncan II, but then by four of his own sons - one of whom, ] (1097-1107), changed the official language of Scotland from Gàidhlig (then, still a Scottish dialect of Old Irish) to Scots (then, a language similar to English but missing the Saxon element that has always been part of standard English). Gaelic dominance of Scotland ended during the reign of ] (1107-1124), and the old Celtic system of matrilineal kingship finally ended and was replaced by a system of primogeniture.


] attempted to prove she was ], the lost daughter of ], but ]ing on her remains eventually proved her to be an impersonator.<ref name=massie1>Massie, Robert K. ''The Romanovs: The Final Chapter''. New York, 1995, pp. 239, 251. {{ISBN|0-394-58048-6}}.</ref> Although she did not claim the throne, ''per se'', as women could not succeed to the Russian throne so long as any male dynast survived, she became more famous than any of the various Romanov claimants to the throne.<ref name=massie1/>
Such a transition never happened in Ireland, but civil war and the imposition of Anglo-Norman rule intervened. Although Ireland had been culturally unified for centuries, it was not politically unified, even as a tribal nation. The Romans having ignored the big green island west of Britain, the Gaels themselves were the last people to successfully invade Ireland and, notwithstanding 750 years of English rule, it is very arguable whether the Norman English ever truly ''conquered'' Ireland. (They controlled Ireland, certainly, but that is not all there is to conquest.) So, even serious coastal encroachments by the Vikings a millennium after their arrival did not prompt the Gaels of Ireland to see a need for political unity even to build a concerted national defence. When a people believe they and their country are immune from invasion, it takes a while for them to realise how vulnerable they actually are.


]
The High King of Ireland was essentially a ceremonial, pseudo-federal overlord (where his over-lordship was even recognised), who exercised actual power only within the realm of which he was actually king. In the case of the southern branch of the Uí Niall, this would have been the Kingdom of Meath (modernly the counties of Meath, West Meath and part of County Dublin). High Kings from the northern branch of the family ruled various kingdoms in what eventually became the province of Ulster.
] (born 1952), who converted to the ] in 2013,<ref name=Wikinews-Russia>{{in lang|ru}} ] — Russian ], 11.06.2013</ref> is the latest pretender to the Russian throne under the name of Prince Nikolai Kirillovich of Leiningen. He is the grandson of ], (sister of Vladimir, and aunt of Maria Vladimirovna), and great-grandson of ]. The ] supports Prince Nikolai as the heir of the Russian throne, since they are of the opinion that Maria Vladimirovna Romanova and Nicholas Romanov are not dynasts.<ref name=Wikinews-Russia/> In early 2014, Nikolai Kirilovich declared himself ''Emperor Nicholas III'' (successor to ]).


In 2007 Nicholas married Countess Isabelle ] and in 2010 had a son, Emich.
Nevertheless, the Uí Niall were apparently powerful in ceremony if not in politic, so that political unification of Ireland was not aided by the usurpation of the high kingship from Mael Sechnaill II and the southern Uí Niall in 1002 by ''Briain ‘Boruma’ mac Cennédig'', of the Kingdom of Munster. This was the third of the so-called "Three Usurpations of Brian Boru."


==Spanish pretenders==
Brian Boru was a strong king who could have unified Ireland politically, and there is some suggestion he intended to make himself High King of Scotland as well. But he was killed in the Battle of Contarf in 1014, and twelve years as High King was not long enough to unify the island politically. Mael Sechnaill II was restored to the High Kingship but ''he'' died in 1022, too soon to undo the damage done by Brian's "coup." From 1022 through the Norman take-over of 1171, the High Kingship was held by "Kings with Opposition" - that is, whoever was strong enough to overthrow the High King of the day and take the Hill of Tara simply did so. This 150-year period of regnal unrest between families now called O'Brian, O'Conner, McLoughlin/O'Melaghlin, and others, was eventually immortalised in the children's game called "King of the Hill." The game is still popular among American children, who take turns trying to push each other off a low stool, chair, or other make-shift hill while arguing, "I'm king of the hill!" "No! I'm king!"


The ] line has claimed the ] after ] was succeeded by his daughter ] instead of his brother ]. Their claim was defended in ] during the 19th centuries. Following the death of the last senior-line claimant, ] in 1936, ] became regent and later claimed the throne as ''Javier I''. However, following the death of Xavier in 1977, the Carlist succession was in disarray as the heir, ], held left-wing socialist views that were viewed as incompatible with Carlism, and thus an incompatible claimant, leaving his younger, more conservative brother ] as a rival claimant. As of 2024, the two legitimate claimants to the Carlist succession are Prince Sixtus Henry of Bourbon-Parma, Duke of Aranjuez and his nephew ].
Because the native Irish high kingship never transitioned to a system of nation-state kingship primogeniture but simply faded into an oblivion of civil war between competing Irish royal families, there are literally as many as a million or more people who can make a claim to the ancient high kingship of Tara that is as equally valid as anybody else's under the old system disrupted by what may be called Brian Boru's "coup de tribe." Indeed, as a reputed descendant of Brian Boru and of the Uí Niall Dynasty both through his late grandmother, the current heir to the statutory throne that includes Northern Ireland, ], could be considered a viable pretender to the high kingship of Ireland, especially as he ''would'' be making the claim through the female line of his ancestry. {The British Royal Family has publicly claimed descent from Brian Boru through the late Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother, and from other ancestors associated with the Ui Niall Dynasty - usually via marriage through the Royal Family's Scottish ancestry; see the history section of the Royal Family's website for bloodlines and timelines.) But see the remarks above regarding existing native dynasties, whose claims are more valid than those of the current British royal family.


==British pretenders==
Interestingly, there was some talk right after the 1916 Easter Rising in Ireland about inviting the Kaiser's son, Prince Joachim of Prussia, to be King of Ireland. This was obviously anti-English sentiment following the execution of the leaders of the rebellion (except for Eamonn De Valera, who was an American citizen - born in New York City). Paradoxically, Irish public opinion was ''against'' the Easter Rising and the leaders were spat upon when they surrendered - but when the government executed them instead of just sending them to prison, public opinion swung completely the other way, against Britain and ''for'' independence - except in the northeast, where the majority of people were (still are) an ethnic mix of Scots-Irish, Anglo-Irish, Norse-Irish, and native Irish minorities.
{{Unreferenced section|date=March 2008}}


===England, Scotland and Ireland===
Insomuch as the whole of Ireland was a province of United Kingdom in 1916, Prince Joachim would never have become King of Ireland even if he had wanted the job. But if he ''had'' become king, and Ireland still had subsequently become a republic, Joachim's grandson, ], would be an Irish pretender; and, afterward, his son, ], would be an Irish as well as a Russian pretender. But if the Irish could not put up with the constitutional monarchs of Britain, it's highly unlikely they would ever have put up with the ''absolute'' monarchs of Germany and Russia.


After the execution by the English Parliament of ] King ] in 1649, his son ] was proclaimed king in Scotland (where he was crowned in 1651) and Ireland; but those two countries were invaded by English forces and annexed to the ] under ] in 1653. Thus, Charles II was pretender to the throne of England from 1649 to the restoration of 1660, and exiled/deposed King of Scots and King of Ireland, 1653 to 1660. He died in 1685 and his brother ] came to the throne. He had converted to Catholicism but this only became a worry when his second wife bore a son who would precede his two Protestant daughters. James was thus deposed by his elder daughter and his son-in-law (who was also his nephew, son of his sister Mary) during the ] in December 1688; they were formally offered the English and Scottish thrones by their respective parliaments a month later – which was still 1688 in England (where New Year's Day was 25 March until 1752) but was already 1689 in Scotland (which adopted 1 January as New Year's Day in 1600). James made several attempts to regain the throne before his death in 1701, the most important of which was an effort he made with Irish support – that country having not yet acceded to the succession of ] ] – which led to the ] and the ], and set the stage for the subsequent ] (or rebellions). These were a series of uprisings or wars between 1688 and 1746 in which supporters of James, his son ("The Old Pretender") and grandson ("The Young Pretender") attempted to restore his direct male line to the throne.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Seward |first1=Desmond |title=The King Over the Water: A Complete History of the Jacobites |date=28 April 2021 |publisher=Birlinn |isbn=978-1-78885-307-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=c1tVEAAAQBAJ |language=en}}</ref>
Some sources suggest that Alice, Duchess of Calabria, is a pretender to the throne of England. This is because she is the senior descendant of King Edward the Confessor.(See, ). However, this is debateable - firstly, because the kingship of England in the Anglo-Saxon period was elective; secondly, because Edward had no children and, thus, cannot possibly have any living descendants; and, thirdly, senior descandant means she is the ''eldest'' living representatives of Edward the Confessor, rather than the closest living relation.


* ], the Roman Catholic son of the deposed James II and VII, was barred from the succession to the throne by the ]. Notwithstanding the ], he claimed the separate thrones of Scotland, as James VIII, and of England and Ireland, as James III, until his death in 1766. In ] terms, Acts of Parliament (of England or Scotland) after 1688 (including the Acts of Union) did not receive the required ] of the legitimate Jacobite monarch and, therefore, were without legal effect. James was responsible for a number of conspiracies and rebellions, particularly in the Highlands of Scotland. The most notable was the ].
On the first point, when Edward the Confessor died, the Witenagemot convened the next day and selected ] to succeed him as king. Except by election by the Witenagemot, no person could be pretender to the throne of England who was not at least somehow related to Harold II Godwinson.
* ] ('''"Bonnie Prince Charlie"'''), James Francis' elder son and the would-be Charles III, who led in his father's name the last major Jacobite rebellion, the ]. He died in 1788 without legitimate issue.
* ] (best known as the '''Cardinal-Duke of York'''), the younger brother of Charles Edward and a Roman Catholic ], who took up the claim to the throne as the would-be Henry IX of England, though he was the final Jacobite heir to publicly do so. He died unmarried in 1807.


After 1807, the line of James VII and II became extinct. The Jacobites had ceased to have much political significance after the failure of the 1745 uprising, and the movement essentially became completely dormant after Henry's death. Genealogically, the next most senior line to the English and Scottish thrones was through James II's youngest sister, ], whose daughter had married into the ]. To the very limited extent that Jacobitism survived the death of Cardinal York, they supported the claims of this line. Its current representative is ], though he himself does not claim the title, his secretary having announced once that "HRM (]) is very content being a Prince of ]".
On the second point, Edward the Confessor had no children. His nearest blood relatives were William II of Normandy (later William I "The Conqueror" of England), and the rest of the Norman royal family. Edward - through his mother, Emma - was a grandson of Richard I of Normandy, while William was a great-grandson of Richard I. Edward and William's father were thus first cousins, making Edward and William first cousins once removed. ], however, as the son of ], who was the son of ] - elder half-brother of Edward the Confessor - would have been a nearer relative than William II of Normandy. But this becomes a moot point, since Edgar's sister, Margaret, married ], and their descendants include the current monarch, Queen ].


Other pretenders to the throne have included:<ref>{{cite book |last1=Potter |first1=Jeremy |title=Pretenders |date=1986 |publisher=Constable |isbn=978-0-09-465870-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pFRnAAAAMAAJ |language=en}}</ref>
The third point requires no real elaboration. The dowager Duchess of Calabria is the "senior representative" of living relatives of Edward the Confessor because she was born in ], very likely making her the eldest of the living relatives of Edward the Confessor.
*] ({{Circa|1477|1525}}) was a pretender to the throne of England. His claim to be ] in 1487 threatened the newly established reign of ] (reigned 1485–1509).
* ], a ] who claimed to be ], and tried twice to invade England and capture the throne in the late 15th Century.
* ], (1974- ) ] & head of the ]. Member of the ] family; also known as ''King Simon I''.


===Wales===
== Ottoman pretenders ==
] (1349–1416) is probably the best-known Welsh pretender, though whether he was pretender or Prince of Wales depends upon one's source of information. ], who died in 1282, was the only Prince of Wales whose status as ruler was formally recognised by the English Crown, though three of the four men who claimed the throne of Gwynedd between the assumption of the title by ] in the 1160s and the loss of Welsh independence in 1283 also used the title or similar. ] also briefly used the title during ]. Since 1301, the title of Prince of Wales has been given to the eldest living son of the King or Queen Regnant of England (subsequently of Great Britain, 1707, and of United Kingdom, 1801). The word "living" is important. Upon the death of ], Henry VII invested his second son, the future Henry VIII, with the title. The title is not automatic, however, but merges into the Crown when a prince dies or accedes to the throne, and has to be re-conferred by the sovereign.
Eldest son during the reign of his father, ] claimed the Sultanate although he was defeated in battle months later by his eldest brother (by birth) ]. He fled to Rhodes Island then eventually to the Papal Territories. His ] claimed ] rights until ] defeated the Ottomans in the 16th century.


Nevertheless, it is Glyndŵr whom many remember as the last native Prince of Wales. He was indeed proclaimed Prince of Wales by his supporters on 16 September 1400, and his revolt in quest of Welsh independence was not quashed by ] until 1409. Later, however, one of Glyndŵr's cousins, ], would marry the widow of ], and their grandson would become ], from whom the current British monarch is descended (through his daughter Margaret Tudor, who married ]).
== False pretenders ==
Some well-known ]s who claimed to be genuine pretenders include:


The various minor kingdoms that came together to form what is today known as the Principality of Wales each had their own royal dynasty. The most important of these realms were ], ] and ]. After 878 the ruling dynasties in these kingdoms each claimed descent from the sons of ] who had conquered them or otherwise achieved their thrones during his reign. ], the father of Rhodri Mawr, had come to power in Gwynedd because the native dynasty, known as the ''House of Cunedda'' had expired. Merfyn was descended from royalty through his own father Gwriad and claimed ancestors from among the rulers of British ] (in particular ]). It was acknowledged by all of the realms of Wales after the time of Rhodri Mawr that the House of Gwynedd (known as the ]) was senior and homage should be paid by each of them to the king of Gwynedd. After the reign of ] of Gwynedd the realm began to merge with the concept of a ''Principality of Wales''. This was realised by Owain's descendant ] in 1267. It was not to last and this new Wales was invaded by England and dismantled between 1277 and 1284. All of the descendants of Llywelyn "the last" and his brothers were either imprisoned or killed.
* Various impersonators of ], notably ], who some still believe was authentic.

* The fake ], whose real name probably was ]
==Irish pretenders==
* ], who claimed to be ]
The business of Irish pretenders is rather more complicated because of the nature of kingship in Ireland before the Norman take-over of 1171. In both Ireland and early Gaelic Scotland, succession to kingship was elective, often (if not usually) by contest, according to a system known as ].
* ], who claimed to be ]

The ] (''Ard Rí'') was essentially a ceremonial, federal ], who exercised actual power only within the realm which was his ]. Because of the laws of succession, there could not be a pretender to this title in the sense it is normally understood. From the 5th century onwards the kingship tended to remain within the dynasty of the ] until ] of Munster wrested control of much of Ireland from ] in 1002. Following his death in 1014 and that of Máel Sechnaill in 1022, the struggle for dominance resulted in Norman intervention from ] in 1171.

There were later attempts by Irish rulers fighting against the Normans to revive the High Kingship such as in 1258 when ] of Cenel Eoghan was so acknowledged, in 1262 when the crown was offered to ] and in 1315 when an offer was made to the Scottish ]. Effectively, the title fell into ]. Apart from the coronation oath, the title was not even used by the Kings of England, each of whom styled himself ]. In 1542 ], styled himself "King of Ireland".

Some Irish rebels discussed offering the Irish throne to ] (son of ]) before the 1916 ].<ref>, ]; Routledge & K. Paul, 1968, p. 141</ref><ref>, Seán Cronin, Continuum, 1981, p. 255</ref> After the failure of the Rising, the royalists were a minority among the rebels, and so the offer was never made.{{Citation needed|reason=Reliable source needed for the whole sentence|date=January 2017}} According to ], ] raised the idea of an Irish monarchy with his great-grandfather Juan O'Donnell.<ref>, Tim Pat Coogan, p. 175</ref>

==Ottoman pretenders==

], eldest of the sons of ] born during his reign, claimed the Sultanate after the death of his father; he was defeated in battle months later by his eldest brother (by birth) ]. He fled to the island of Rhodes, then eventually to the Papal States. His ] claimed his rights until ] in the 16th century. After the Ottoman Empire was abolished and the ] came into power, the successive heads of the Ottoman family claimed the throne of the Ottoman Empire. The latest pretender to the Imperial ] is ], since 18 January 2021.

==Kingdom of Jerusalem==
The ] held the title of "King of Zion" through their claim of descent from the Biblical ] through his son ]. ] dropped the use of this title. The Ethiopian Emperors continued to use the honorific of "Conquering Lion of the Tribe of Judah" up until the monarchy ended with the fall of Emperor ] in 1974.

Since the fall of the ], many European rulers have claimed to be its rightful heir. None of these, however, have actually ruled over a part of the former Kingdom. Today there are several potential European claimants on the basis of the inheritance of the title. None of the claimants have any power in the area of the former Kingdom.

==Asian pretenders==
===Japan===
In the fourteenth century, two lines of the Imperial clan, ] and ], claimed the throne.<ref>Nussbaum, Louis Frédéric and Käthe Roth. (2005). ''Japan Encyclopedia'', p. 251; n.b., Louis-Frédéric is the pseudonym of Louis-Frédéric Nussbaum, ''see'' {{webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20120524174828/http://dispatch.opac.ddb.de/DB=4.1/PPN?PPN=128842709 |date=2012-05-24 }}.</ref> Their rivalry was resolved in 1392: while every emperor of the Southern Court enthroned prior to 1392 was established as legitimate, the throne was determined by ] of the Northern Court and his successors.

Since 1911, the ] has declared the southern claimants were actually the rightful emperors despite the fact that all subsequent emperors including the then-] were descended from the Northern Court, reasoning the Southern Court retained possession of the ], thus converting the emperors of the former Northern court into mere pretenders. In other words, six former emperors of the Northern Court have been counted as pretenders instead since then. As a result of this compromise, the present ] is descended of the Northern Court Emperors.

] publicly challenged Emperor ], disputing the legitimacy of his bloodline.<ref>] (2000). </ref> Kumazawa claimed to be the 19th direct descendant of ],<ref>Pan-Asia Newspaper Alliance. (1959) ''The Asia Who's Who,'' p. 309.</ref> the last Emperor of the Southern Court.

===Singapore===
] ceded the territory of Singapore to the British in the 19th century, but their descendants lived in the former royal palace until expelled by the government. They now live in obscurity.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Lin |first1=Lin |last2=Su |first2=Edgar |last3=Geddie |first3=John |title=Cabbies and office workers: Meet Singapore's ordinary royals |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-singapore-royals-idUSKBN27C06O |website=Reuters |date=27 October 2020 |access-date=27 October 2020 |archive-date=27 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201027143223/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-singapore-royals-idUSKBN27C06O |url-status=live }}</ref>

==Heraldry==
Pretence is demonstrated in heraldry by placing on the shield of the pretender an ] of the arms of the former holder of the title pretended to, known as an "inescutcheon of pretence". As well as being used by royalty, the inescutcheon of pretence is also used by English aristocratic and gentry families where a husband of an heraldic heiress (i.e. a daughter with no brothers) will display his wife's paternal arms on an inescutcheon placed within his own coat of arms. Following the husband's death the couple's son and heir will remove the inescutcheon and show it instead as a quartering.

==False pretenders==
{{seealso|List of impostors#False royal heritage claims}}
Throughout history people have claimed fraudulently to be displaced monarchs or heirs who had disappeared or supposedly died under mysterious circumstances.
Some of them were ]s.
Such false{{Explain|reason=Why "false". See talk, for example ]|date=September 2022}} pretenders include:<ref>{{cite book |last1=Cheesman |first1=Clive |last2=Williams |first2=Dr Jonathan |title=Rebels, Pretenders & Imposters |date=2000 |publisher=British Museum |isbn=978-0-7141-0899-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=m9QWAQAAIAAJ |language=en}}</ref>
* Bertrand of Rais (or Ray), who claimed to be ]
* ], who claimed to be the blinded Byzantine Emperor ]
* ], who claimed to be ]<ref>{{cite book |last1=Amin |first1=Nathen |title=Henry VII and the Tudor Pretenders: Simnel, Warbeck, and Warwick |date=15 April 2021 |publisher=Amberley Publishing Limited |isbn=978-1-4456-7509-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=X3MqEAAAQBAJ |language=en}}</ref>
* ], who claimed to be ]<ref>{{cite book |title=Famous Imposters |hdl=2027/wu.89094736824 |url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/wu.89094736824 |language=en}}</ref>
* ], one of four people who claimed to be ]
* ], who claimed to be ] * ], who claimed to be ]
* ], actually reigned as Tsar of Russia for nearly a year before he was killed in a riot
* The three ]s of Russia
**]
* ] who claimed connection to the ]
**]
* ], one of over 30 pretenders who claimed to be ]
* ] who claimed connections to various European royal houses * ], who was claimed to be the stillborn son of ]
* ] who claimed descent from ] King ] * ], who claimed to be ]
* ], who claims to be the Jacobite heir to the Scottish throne. * ], who claimed to be a ]
* ], who claimed to be ]
* ], (aka "Rosario Saxe-Coburg-Bragança"), self-styled ] and heir of Hilda Toledano (self-named ''Maria Pia de Saxe-Coburg-Bragança''), claimed ] descendant of King ].


==Notes== ==See also==
* ]
<references/>
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


==References==
<!--Categories-->
{{Reflist}}
]


{{Coronation}}
<!--Other languages-->
{{Authority control}}
]

]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 19:32, 6 November 2024

Someone who claims to be rightful holder of a throne that is vacant or held by another This article is about the term "pretender" as applied to monarchies. For other uses, see Pretender (disambiguation).
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Pretender" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (August 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
James Francis Edward Stuart, later known as the Old Pretender, depicted c. 1703, having been recognised in 1701 by King Louis XIV of France as the rightful claimant to the English, Irish, and Scottish thrones

A pretender is someone who claims to be the rightful ruler of a country although not recognized as such by the current government. The term may often be used to either refer to a descendant of a deposed monarchy or a claim that is not legitimate.

In addition, it may also refer to that of a deposed monarch, a type of claimant referred to as head of a house. In addition, it may also refer to a former monarchy.

Queen Anne popularized this word, using it to refer to her Roman Catholic half-brother James Francis Edward Stuart, the Jacobite heir, in an address to Parliament in 1708: "The French fleet sailed from Dunkirk ... with the Pretender on board."

In 1807 the French Emperor Napoleon complained that the Almanach de Gotha continued to list German princes whom he had deposed. This episode established that publication as the pre-eminent authority on the titles of deposed monarchs and nobility, many of which were restored in 1815 after the end of Napoleon's reign.

Etymology

The noun "pretender" is derived from the French verb prétendre, itself derived from the Latin praetendere ("to stretch out before", "to hold before (as a pretext)", "to extend before"), from the verb tendo ("to stretch"), plus the preposition prae ("before, in front"). The English, French and Latin words have prima facie no pejorative connotation, although one who pretends to a position with no plausible claim or with an entirely false claim, may be differentiated as a "false pretender", see for example Perkin Warbeck.

Roman Empire

Ancient Rome knew many pretenders to the offices making up the title of Roman emperor, especially during the Crisis of the Third Century.

These are customarily referred to as the Thirty Tyrants, which was an allusion to the Thirty Tyrants of Athens some five hundred years earlier; although the comparison is questionable, and the Romans were separate aspirants, not (as the Athenians were) a Committee of Public Safety. The Loeb translation of the appropriate chapter of the Augustan History therefore represents the Latin triginta tyranni by "Thirty Pretenders" to avoid this artificial and confusing parallel. Not all of them were afterwards considered pretenders; several were actually successful in becoming emperor at least in part of the empire for a brief period.

Greek pretenders

Byzantine Empire

Successions to the Roman Empire long continued at Constantinople. Most seriously, after the fall of Constantinople to the Fourth Crusade in 1204, and its eventual recovery by Michael VIII Palaiologos, there came to be three Byzantine successor states, each of which claimed to be the Roman Empire, and several Latin claimants (including the Republic of Venice and the houses of Montferrat and Courtenay) to the Latin Empire the Crusaders had set up in its place. At times, some of these states and titles were subjected to multiple claims.

Cypriot pretenders

Following the defeat and death of King James III King of Cyprus in 1474, his younger and illegitimate brother, Eugène Matteo de Lusignan, also styled d'Arménie (died 1523) removed to Sicily, then to Malta. He was acknowledged as rightful heir to the thrones of Cyprus, Armenia, Jerusalem, and Antioch, although he never made serious efforts to pursue the claims. The title of "Barone de Baccari" was created in 1508 for Jacques Matteo (sives Eugene Matteo) d'Armenia with the remainder to his descendants in perpetuity. Eugene, illegitimate son of King Jacques II of Cyprus, had, when his family were exiled, first gone to Naples, then Sicily, then settled on Malta, marrying a Sicilian heiress, Donna Paola Mazzara (a descendant of the Royal House of Aragon of Sicily and Aragon), with issue.

Modern Greece

The claimant to the throne of the last Greek kingdom is Pavlos, Crown Prince of Greece. He belongs to the House of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg, the senior branch of the House of Oldenburg. His designated heir is his son Prince Constantine Alexios of Greece and Denmark.

French pretenders

See also: English claims to the French throne

The establishment of the First Republic and the execution of Louis XVI in 1793 led to the king's son becoming pretender to the abolished throne, styled as Louis XVII. As Louis XVII was a child and imprisoned in Paris by the revolutionaries, his uncle, the Comte de Provence, proclaimed himself regent in his nephew's name. After Louis XVII died in 1795, the Comte de Provence became pretender himself, as Louis XVIII.

Louis XVIII was restored to the throne in 1814, and was succeeded by his brother Charles X in 1824. Charles X was, however, forced into exile by the July Revolution. Charles X and his son, Louis-Antoine, Duke of Angoulême, abdicated their claims in favor of Charles's grandson, Henri, Count of Chambord; however, their cousin the Duke of Orléans, a descendant of Louis XIV's younger brother, mounted the throne as Louis Philippe I, King of the French.

For most of the July Monarchy, the legitimists, as supporters of the exiled senior line came to be known, were uncertain of whom to support. Some believed the abdication of Charles and his son legal, and recognized the young Chambord as king, while others maintained that abdication was unconstitutional in France of the ancien régime, and continued to recognize first Charles X and then Louis-Antoine, until the latter's death in 1844. On his uncle's death, Chambord claimed the crown, but lived in exile and upon his death in 1883, the direct male-line of Louis XV became extinct.

In 1848, Louis Philippe was himself overthrown by the February Revolution, and abdicated the throne in favor of his young grandson, Philippe, Comte de Paris. However, a republic was proclaimed, leaving Paris, like his cousin Chambord, merely a pretender to a no longer existing crown. Over the next several decades, there were several attempts at a so-called "fusion", to unite both groups of monarchists in support of the childless Chambord as king, who would recognize the Count of Paris as his heir. Those efforts failed in the 1850s, but after the establishment of the Third Republic in 1870, when a royalist majority was elected to the Chamber of Deputies, fusion again became the monarchist strategy. As a result, in 1873 the Count of Paris withdrew his own bid for the throne and recognized Chambord as legitimate pretender to the French crown. In spite of this apparent unity among royalist forces, restoration of the monarchy was not to be; Chambord refused to accept the Tricolor flag, which rendered him unacceptable to most Frenchmen as a constitutional king. The monarchists hoped that after Chambord's death they could unite and crown the Orléanist candidate. But Chambord lived until 1883, while France's royalists had lost their majority in parliament by 1877. The erstwhile Orléanist Adolphe Thiers thus called Chambord "The French Washington", i.e. the true "founder" of the Republic.

By 1883 most French monarchists accepted the Count of Paris as head of royal house. A minority of reactionaries, the so-called Blancs d'Espagne ("Spanish Whites"), continued to withhold support from the House of Orléans and chose instead Juan, Count of Montizon, the Carlist pretender to the Spanish throne, who also happened to be the senior male descendant of Louis XIV.

The arguments are, on one side, that Louis XIV's younger grandson, Philip de Bourbon, Duke of Anjou renounced any future claim to the French throne when he left France to become king of Spain as Philip V in 1700 (the renunciation was ratified internationally by the Treaty of Utrecht), ostensibly leaving the Dukes of Orléans as heirs to the throne of France in the event of extinction of descendants of Louis XIV's elder grandson Louis, Duke of Burgundy, which occurred in 1883. On the other side, Anjou's renunciation is held to be invalid because prior to the revolution it was a fundamental tenet of the French monarchy that the crown could never be diverted from the rightful (senior line) heir of Hugh Capet. Moreover, although the Orléans volunteered to defer their rival claim to the throne after 1873, the regicidal vote of their ancestor Philippe Égalité in 1789 and the usurpation of Louis Philippe in 1830 are alleged to have extinguished all rights to the throne for the Orléans branch. The schism has continued to the present day, with supporters of the senior line reclaiming the title of "Legitimist", leaving their opponent royalists to be known, once again, as "Orléanists". The current representative of the senior line is Louis Alphonse, Duke of Anjou, the senior legitimate living descendant of Hugh Capet (and of Philip V d'Anjou of Spain) who was born and raised in Spain. The Orléanist line, which returned to live in France when the law of banishment was repealed in 1950, is represented by Prince Jean, Duke of Vendôme, senior male-line descendant of King Louis Philippe.

In addition to these two claims to the historic royal throne of France, there have also been pretenders to the imperial throne of France, created first by Napoleon Bonaparte in 1804 and recreated by his nephew Emperor Napoleon III in 1852 (abolished 1870). This claim is today disputed between Jean-Christophe, Prince Napoléon and his own father, the self-avowed republican Prince Charles Napoléon (deemed to be excluded from the succession due to a non-dynastic re-marriage), both descendants of Napoleon I's youngest brother, Jérôme Bonaparte.

Russian pretenders

There is much debate over who is the legitimate heir to the Russian throne, and bitter dispute within the family itself. Grand Duchess Maria Vladimirovna is considered by some to be the legitimate heir. She is the only child of Grand Duke Vladimir who died in 1992, a great-grandson of Tsar Alexander II, whom some considered the last male dynast of the House of Romanov. Some of her opponents believe she is ineligible to claim the throne because she was born of a marriage that would have been deemed morganatic under Russia's monarchy, which was abolished in 1917. Others oppose her for reasons similar to those of the anti-Orleanist rationale: her grandfather's perceived disloyalty and dynastic ambition are seen as removing any rights which might otherwise have belonged to her branch of the former dynasty.

Still others maintain that the restrictive, pre-revolutionary marital rules of the Romanovs leave no one who can claim to be rightful heir to the dynasty's legacy. Others recognized Nicholas Romanov, Prince of Russia as head of the family, being a descendant of Emperor Nicholas I and the elected president of the Romanov Family Association, which consists of most living male-line descendants of the Romanov emperors. Neither he nor his younger brother, Prince Dimitri Romanov, had sons and since their deaths no new claims have been advanced by this branch.

Anna Anderson attempted to prove she was Grand Duchess Anastasia Nikolaevna of Russia, the lost daughter of Nicholas II, but DNA testing on her remains eventually proved her to be an impersonator. Although she did not claim the throne, per se, as women could not succeed to the Russian throne so long as any male dynast survived, she became more famous than any of the various Romanov claimants to the throne.

Karl Emich of Leiningen, also known under his Christian Orthodox name Nikolai Kirillovich Romanov

Prince Karl Emich of Leiningen (born 1952), who converted to the Eastern Orthodoxy in 2013, is the latest pretender to the Russian throne under the name of Prince Nikolai Kirillovich of Leiningen. He is the grandson of Grand Duchess Maria Cyrillovna of Russia, (sister of Vladimir, and aunt of Maria Vladimirovna), and great-grandson of Cyril Vladimirovich, Grand Duke of Russia. The Monarchist Party of Russia supports Prince Nikolai as the heir of the Russian throne, since they are of the opinion that Maria Vladimirovna Romanova and Nicholas Romanov are not dynasts. In early 2014, Nikolai Kirilovich declared himself Emperor Nicholas III (successor to Nicholas II).

In 2007 Nicholas married Countess Isabelle von und zu Egloffstein and in 2010 had a son, Emich.

Spanish pretenders

The Carlist line has claimed the throne of Spain after Ferdinand VII was succeeded by his daughter Isabella II instead of his brother Infante Carlos María Isidro, Count of Molina. Their claim was defended in several wars during the 19th centuries. Following the death of the last senior-line claimant, Infante Alfonso Carlos, Duke of San Jaime in 1936, Prince Xavier of Bourbon-Parma became regent and later claimed the throne as Javier I. However, following the death of Xavier in 1977, the Carlist succession was in disarray as the heir, Prince Carlos Hugo of Bourbon-Parma, held left-wing socialist views that were viewed as incompatible with Carlism, and thus an incompatible claimant, leaving his younger, more conservative brother the Duke of Aranjuez as a rival claimant. As of 2024, the two legitimate claimants to the Carlist succession are Prince Sixtus Henry of Bourbon-Parma, Duke of Aranjuez and his nephew Prince Carlos, Duke of Parma and Piacenza.

British pretenders

This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (March 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

England, Scotland and Ireland

After the execution by the English Parliament of Stuart King Charles I in 1649, his son Charles II was proclaimed king in Scotland (where he was crowned in 1651) and Ireland; but those two countries were invaded by English forces and annexed to the Commonwealth of England under Oliver Cromwell in 1653. Thus, Charles II was pretender to the throne of England from 1649 to the restoration of 1660, and exiled/deposed King of Scots and King of Ireland, 1653 to 1660. He died in 1685 and his brother James II and VII came to the throne. He had converted to Catholicism but this only became a worry when his second wife bore a son who would precede his two Protestant daughters. James was thus deposed by his elder daughter and his son-in-law (who was also his nephew, son of his sister Mary) during the Glorious Revolution in December 1688; they were formally offered the English and Scottish thrones by their respective parliaments a month later – which was still 1688 in England (where New Year's Day was 25 March until 1752) but was already 1689 in Scotland (which adopted 1 January as New Year's Day in 1600). James made several attempts to regain the throne before his death in 1701, the most important of which was an effort he made with Irish support – that country having not yet acceded to the succession of William and Mary – which led to the Battle of the Boyne and the Battle of Aughrim, and set the stage for the subsequent Jacobite risings (or rebellions). These were a series of uprisings or wars between 1688 and 1746 in which supporters of James, his son ("The Old Pretender") and grandson ("The Young Pretender") attempted to restore his direct male line to the throne.

  • James Francis Edward Stuart, the Roman Catholic son of the deposed James II and VII, was barred from the succession to the throne by the Act of Settlement 1701. Notwithstanding the Act of Union 1707, he claimed the separate thrones of Scotland, as James VIII, and of England and Ireland, as James III, until his death in 1766. In Jacobite terms, Acts of Parliament (of England or Scotland) after 1688 (including the Acts of Union) did not receive the required royal assent of the legitimate Jacobite monarch and, therefore, were without legal effect. James was responsible for a number of conspiracies and rebellions, particularly in the Highlands of Scotland. The most notable was the Jacobite rising of 1715–16.
  • Charles Edward Stuart ("Bonnie Prince Charlie"), James Francis' elder son and the would-be Charles III, who led in his father's name the last major Jacobite rebellion, the Jacobite rising of 1745–46. He died in 1788 without legitimate issue.
  • Henry Benedict Stuart (best known as the Cardinal-Duke of York), the younger brother of Charles Edward and a Roman Catholic Cardinal, who took up the claim to the throne as the would-be Henry IX of England, though he was the final Jacobite heir to publicly do so. He died unmarried in 1807.

After 1807, the line of James VII and II became extinct. The Jacobites had ceased to have much political significance after the failure of the 1745 uprising, and the movement essentially became completely dormant after Henry's death. Genealogically, the next most senior line to the English and Scottish thrones was through James II's youngest sister, Henriette Anne, whose daughter had married into the House of Savoy. To the very limited extent that Jacobitism survived the death of Cardinal York, they supported the claims of this line. Its current representative is Franz, Duke of Bavaria, though he himself does not claim the title, his secretary having announced once that "HRM (sic) is very content being a Prince of Bavaria".

Other pretenders to the throne have included:

Wales

Owain Glyndŵr (1349–1416) is probably the best-known Welsh pretender, though whether he was pretender or Prince of Wales depends upon one's source of information. Llywelyn ap Gruffydd ap Llywelyn, who died in 1282, was the only Prince of Wales whose status as ruler was formally recognised by the English Crown, though three of the four men who claimed the throne of Gwynedd between the assumption of the title by Owain Gwynedd in the 1160s and the loss of Welsh independence in 1283 also used the title or similar. Madog ap Llywelyn also briefly used the title during his revolt of 1294–95. Since 1301, the title of Prince of Wales has been given to the eldest living son of the King or Queen Regnant of England (subsequently of Great Britain, 1707, and of United Kingdom, 1801). The word "living" is important. Upon the death of Arthur, Prince of Wales, Henry VII invested his second son, the future Henry VIII, with the title. The title is not automatic, however, but merges into the Crown when a prince dies or accedes to the throne, and has to be re-conferred by the sovereign.

Nevertheless, it is Glyndŵr whom many remember as the last native Prince of Wales. He was indeed proclaimed Prince of Wales by his supporters on 16 September 1400, and his revolt in quest of Welsh independence was not quashed by Henry IV until 1409. Later, however, one of Glyndŵr's cousins, Owain Tudor, would marry the widow of Henry V, and their grandson would become Henry VII, from whom the current British monarch is descended (through his daughter Margaret Tudor, who married James IV of Scotland).

The various minor kingdoms that came together to form what is today known as the Principality of Wales each had their own royal dynasty. The most important of these realms were Gwynedd, Powys and Deheubarth. After 878 the ruling dynasties in these kingdoms each claimed descent from the sons of Rhodri Mawr who had conquered them or otherwise achieved their thrones during his reign. Merfyn Frych, the father of Rhodri Mawr, had come to power in Gwynedd because the native dynasty, known as the House of Cunedda had expired. Merfyn was descended from royalty through his own father Gwriad and claimed ancestors from among the rulers of British Rheged (in particular Llywarch Hen). It was acknowledged by all of the realms of Wales after the time of Rhodri Mawr that the House of Gwynedd (known as the House of Aberffraw) was senior and homage should be paid by each of them to the king of Gwynedd. After the reign of Owain ap Gruffudd of Gwynedd the realm began to merge with the concept of a Principality of Wales. This was realised by Owain's descendant Llywelyn ap Gruffudd in 1267. It was not to last and this new Wales was invaded by England and dismantled between 1277 and 1284. All of the descendants of Llywelyn "the last" and his brothers were either imprisoned or killed.

Irish pretenders

The business of Irish pretenders is rather more complicated because of the nature of kingship in Ireland before the Norman take-over of 1171. In both Ireland and early Gaelic Scotland, succession to kingship was elective, often (if not usually) by contest, according to a system known as Tanistry.

The High King of Ireland (Ard Rí) was essentially a ceremonial, federal overlord, who exercised actual power only within the realm which was his dynastic seat. Because of the laws of succession, there could not be a pretender to this title in the sense it is normally understood. From the 5th century onwards the kingship tended to remain within the dynasty of the Uí Néill until Brian Boru of Munster wrested control of much of Ireland from Máel Sechnaill mac Domnaill in 1002. Following his death in 1014 and that of Máel Sechnaill in 1022, the struggle for dominance resulted in Norman intervention from Henry II of England in 1171.

There were later attempts by Irish rulers fighting against the Normans to revive the High Kingship such as in 1258 when Brian Ua Néill of Cenel Eoghan was so acknowledged, in 1262 when the crown was offered to Haakon IV of Norway and in 1315 when an offer was made to the Scottish Edward Bruce. Effectively, the title fell into abeyance. Apart from the coronation oath, the title was not even used by the Kings of England, each of whom styled himself Lord of Ireland. In 1542 Henry VIII, styled himself "King of Ireland".

Some Irish rebels discussed offering the Irish throne to Prince Joachim of Prussia (son of Kaiser Wilhelm II) before the 1916 Easter Rising. After the failure of the Rising, the royalists were a minority among the rebels, and so the offer was never made. According to Hugo O'Donnell, 7th Duke of Tetuan, Éamon de Valera raised the idea of an Irish monarchy with his great-grandfather Juan O'Donnell.

Ottoman pretenders

Cem Sultan, eldest of the sons of Mehmet the Conqueror born during his reign, claimed the Sultanate after the death of his father; he was defeated in battle months later by his eldest brother (by birth) Bayezid II. He fled to the island of Rhodes, then eventually to the Papal States. His descendants claimed his rights until the Knights Hospitaller defeated the Ottomans in the 16th century. After the Ottoman Empire was abolished and the Republic of Turkey came into power, the successive heads of the Ottoman family claimed the throne of the Ottoman Empire. The latest pretender to the Imperial House of Osman is Harun Osman, since 18 January 2021.

Kingdom of Jerusalem

The Emperors of Ethiopia held the title of "King of Zion" through their claim of descent from the Biblical House of David through his son King Solomon. Menelik II dropped the use of this title. The Ethiopian Emperors continued to use the honorific of "Conquering Lion of the Tribe of Judah" up until the monarchy ended with the fall of Emperor Haile Selassie in 1974.

Since the fall of the Kingdom of Jerusalem, many European rulers have claimed to be its rightful heir. None of these, however, have actually ruled over a part of the former Kingdom. Today there are several potential European claimants on the basis of the inheritance of the title. None of the claimants have any power in the area of the former Kingdom.

Asian pretenders

Japan

In the fourteenth century, two lines of the Imperial clan, Northern Court and Southern Court, claimed the throne. Their rivalry was resolved in 1392: while every emperor of the Southern Court enthroned prior to 1392 was established as legitimate, the throne was determined by Emperor Go-Komatsu of the Northern Court and his successors.

Since 1911, the Japanese government has declared the southern claimants were actually the rightful emperors despite the fact that all subsequent emperors including the then-Emperor Meiji were descended from the Northern Court, reasoning the Southern Court retained possession of the Three Sacred Treasures, thus converting the emperors of the former Northern court into mere pretenders. In other words, six former emperors of the Northern Court have been counted as pretenders instead since then. As a result of this compromise, the present Japanese Imperial Family is descended of the Northern Court Emperors.

Kumazawa Hiromichi publicly challenged Emperor Hirohito, disputing the legitimacy of his bloodline. Kumazawa claimed to be the 19th direct descendant of Emperor Go-Kameyama, the last Emperor of the Southern Court.

Singapore

Sultan Hussein Shah of Johor ceded the territory of Singapore to the British in the 19th century, but their descendants lived in the former royal palace until expelled by the government. They now live in obscurity.

Heraldry

Pretence is demonstrated in heraldry by placing on the shield of the pretender an inescutcheon of the arms of the former holder of the title pretended to, known as an "inescutcheon of pretence". As well as being used by royalty, the inescutcheon of pretence is also used by English aristocratic and gentry families where a husband of an heraldic heiress (i.e. a daughter with no brothers) will display his wife's paternal arms on an inescutcheon placed within his own coat of arms. Following the husband's death the couple's son and heir will remove the inescutcheon and show it instead as a quartering.

False pretenders

See also: List of impostors § False royal heritage claims

Throughout history people have claimed fraudulently to be displaced monarchs or heirs who had disappeared or supposedly died under mysterious circumstances. Some of them were look-alikes. Such false pretenders include:

See also

References

  1. "pretender" Archived 2015-11-14 at the Wayback Machine, MacMillian Dictionary. "someone who claims to be the true king, queen, or leader of a country, when another person holds this position."
  2. Curley Jr., Walter J. P. Monarchs-in-Waiting. New York, 1973, pp. 4, 10. ISBN 0-396-06840-5.
  3. "pretender" Archived 2021-06-24 at the Wayback Machine, Merriam-Webster, "a claimant to a throne who is held to have no just title."
    "pretender", Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd edition, Oxford Dictionaries, 1989. "applied to a claimant who is held to have no just title."
  4. Almanach de Gotha uses the "head of the house" terminology. It lists Karl von Habsburg as "Head of the Imperial House of Austria". It lists many others in the form "head of the royal house of ". (James, John. Almanach de Gotha 2016: Volume I Parts I & II) The classic 1944 edition Archived 2022-10-21 at the Wayback Machine uses "chef de la maison" (p. 104).
  5. "pretender", Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd edition, Oxford Dictionaries, 1989. Stuart had earlier been referred to as "the pretended prince of Wales".
  6. Napoleon wrote to his foreign minister, 20 October 1807: "Monsieur de Champagny, this year's Almanach de Gotha is badly done. I protest. There should be more of the French Nobility I have created and less of the German Princes who are no longer sovereign. Furthermore, the Imperial Family of Bonaparte should appear before all other royal dynasties, and let it be clear that we and not the Bourbons are the House of France. Summon the Minister of the Interior of Gotha at once so that I personally may order these changes."
  7. Larousse, Dictionnaire de la langue francaise, "Lexis", Paris, 1979, p. 1494, prétendre à quelque chose = aspirer à l'obtenir
  8. Cassell's Latin Dictionary, Marchant, J.R.V, & Charles, Joseph F., (Eds.), Revised Edition, 1928, p. 436
  9. pretend Archived 2023-01-30 at the Wayback Machine, The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition, 2020. "."
  10. Cassell's Latin Dictionary, Marchant, J.R.V, & Charles, Joseph F., (Eds.), Revised Edition, 1928, p. 569
  11. Cassell's Latin Dictionary, Marchant, J.R.V, & Charles, Joseph F., (Eds.), Revised Edition, 1928, p. 429
  12. "prétendant Archived 2022-05-03 at the Wayback Machine," Global French–English Dictionary, 2018, "personne qui cherche à épouser" (a suiter).
  13. Ladies of Medieval Cyprus and Caterina Cornaro by Leto Severis, Nicosia 1995; p. 152; ISBN 9963810217.
  14. Leto Severis, Ladies of Medieval Cyprus and Caterina Cornaro; Nicosia: 1995; ISBN 9963810217.
  15. ^ Valynseele, Joseph. Les Prétendants aux trônes d'Europe. Paris, 1967, pp. 11, 187–190 (French).
  16. ^ Massie, Robert K. The Romanovs: The Final Chapter. New York, 1995, p. 278. ISBN 0-394-58048-6.
  17. de Badts de Cugnac, Chantal. Coutant de Saisseval, Guy. Le Petit Gotha. Nouvelle Imprimerie Laballery, Paris 2002, p. 702 (French) ISBN 2-9507974-3-1
  18. "Presence of the Romanov Family at the Reburial". Reburial of Empress Maria Fedorovna, September 2006. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark. 12 September 2006. Archived from the original on 7 December 2008.
  19. ^ Massie, Robert K. The Romanovs: The Final Chapter. New York, 1995, pp. 239, 251. ISBN 0-394-58048-6.
  20. ^ (in Russian) n:ru:Монархическая партия объявила об обретении наследника российского Императорского престола — Russian Wikinews, 11.06.2013
  21. Seward, Desmond (28 April 2021). The King Over the Water: A Complete History of the Jacobites. Birlinn. ISBN 978-1-78885-307-1.
  22. Potter, Jeremy (1986). Pretenders. Constable. ISBN 978-0-09-465870-7.
  23. Memoirs of Desmond FitzGerald, 1913–1916, Desmond FitzGerald; Routledge & K. Paul, 1968, p. 141
  24. Irish nationalism: a history of its roots and ideology, Seán Cronin, Continuum, 1981, p. 255
  25. Ireland In The 20th Century, Tim Pat Coogan, p. 175
  26. Nussbaum, Louis Frédéric and Käthe Roth. (2005). Japan Encyclopedia, p. 251; n.b., Louis-Frédéric is the pseudonym of Louis-Frédéric Nussbaum, see Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Authority File Archived 2012-05-24 at archive.today.
  27. Bix, Herbert P. (2000). Hirohito and the Making of Modern Japan, p. 566.
  28. Pan-Asia Newspaper Alliance. (1959) The Asia Who's Who, p. 309.
  29. Lin, Lin; Su, Edgar; Geddie, John (27 October 2020). "Cabbies and office workers: Meet Singapore's ordinary royals". Reuters. Archived from the original on 27 October 2020. Retrieved 27 October 2020.
  30. Cheesman, Clive; Williams, Dr Jonathan (2000). Rebels, Pretenders & Imposters. British Museum. ISBN 978-0-7141-0899-5.
  31. Amin, Nathen (15 April 2021). Henry VII and the Tudor Pretenders: Simnel, Warbeck, and Warwick. Amberley Publishing Limited. ISBN 978-1-4456-7509-1.
  32. Famous Imposters. hdl:2027/wu.89094736824.
Coronation and enthronement
Regalia
  • Items
  • rituals
By continent
Specific customs
See also
Category: