Revision as of 23:18, 21 June 2017 editTheZuza777 (talk | contribs)23 edits →The remainder term: typo in the reminder. Used an undefined symbol P_p instead of B_p← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:21, 15 October 2024 edit undoRsjaffe (talk | contribs)Administrators55,227 editsm clean up, typo(s) fixed: Therefore → Therefore,Tag: AWB | ||
(58 intermediate revisions by 46 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Summation formula}} | |||
In ], the '''Euler–Maclaurin formula''' provides a powerful connection between ]s (see ]) and sums. It can be used to approximate integrals by finite sums, or conversely to evaluate finite sums and ] using integrals and the machinery of calculus. For example, many asymptotic expansions are derived from the formula, and ] for the sum of powers is an immediate consequence. | |||
{{Use American English|date = March 2019}} | |||
In ], the '''Euler–Maclaurin formula''' is a formula for the difference between an ] and a closely related ]. It can be used to approximate integrals by finite sums, or conversely to evaluate finite sums and ] using integrals and the machinery of ]. For example, many asymptotic expansions are derived from the formula, and ] for the sum of powers is an immediate consequence. | |||
The formula was discovered independently by ] and ] around 1735 |
The formula was discovered independently by ] and ] around 1735. Euler needed it to compute slowly converging infinite series while Maclaurin used it to calculate integrals. It was later generalized to ]. | ||
==The formula== | ==The formula== | ||
If |
If {{mvar|m}} and {{mvar|n}} are ]s and {{math|''f''(''x'')}} is a ] or ] valued ] for ]s {{mvar|x}} in the ] {{math|}}, then the integral | ||
<math display=block>I = \int_m^n f(x)\,dx</math> | |||
:<math>I = \int_m^n f(x)\,dx</math> | |||
can be approximated by the sum (or vice versa) | can be approximated by the sum (or vice versa) | ||
<math display=block>S = f(m + 1) + \cdots + f(n - 1) + f(n)</math> | |||
(see ]). The Euler–Maclaurin formula provides expressions for the difference between the sum and the integral in terms of the higher ]s {{math|''f''{{isup|(''k'')}}(''x'')}} evaluated at the endpoints of the interval, that is to say {{math|''x'' {{=}} ''m''}} and {{math|''x'' {{=}} ''n''}}. | |||
Explicitly, for {{mvar|p}} a positive ] and a function {{math|''f''(''x'')}} that is {{mvar|p}} times ] on the interval {{math|}}, we have | |||
:<math>S = f(m + 1) + \cdots + f(n - 1) + f(n)</math> | |||
<math display=block>S - I = \sum_{k=1}^p {\frac{B_k}{k!} \left(f^{(k - 1)}(n) - f^{(k - 1)}(m)\right)} + R_p,</math> | |||
where {{mvar|B<sub>k</sub>}} is the {{mvar|k}}th ] (with {{math|''B''<sub>1</sub> {{=}} {{sfrac|1|2}}}}) and {{mvar|R<sub>p</sub>}} is an ] which depends on {{mvar|n}}, {{mvar|m}}, {{mvar|p}}, and {{mvar|f}} and is usually small for suitable values of {{mvar|p}}. | |||
The formula is often written with the subscript taking only even values, since the odd Bernoulli numbers are zero except for {{math|''B''<sub>1</sub>}}. In this case we have<ref name=":0" /><ref name="DLMF">{{cite web|url=http://dlmf.nist.gov/2.10|title=Digital Library of Mathematical Functions: Sums and Sequences|publisher=]}}</ref> | |||
(see ]). The Euler–Maclaurin formula provides expressions for the difference between the sum and the integral in terms of the higher derivatives <math>f^{(k)}(x)</math> evaluated at the end points of the interval, that is to say when <math>x=m</math> and <math>x=n.</math> | |||
<math display=block>\sum_{i=m}^n f(i) = | |||
Explicitly, for a natural number <math>p</math> and a function <math>f(x)</math> that is <math>p</math> times continuously differentiable in the interval <math>,</math> we have | |||
:<math> S - I = \sum_{k=1}^p {\frac{B_k}{k!} (f^{(k - 1)}(n) - f^{(k - 1)}(m))} + R</math> | |||
where <math>B_k</math> is the <math>k</math>th ] (with <math>B_1=1/2</math>) and <math>R</math> is an ] which is normally small for suitable values of <math>p</math> and depends on <math>n, m, p,</math> and <math>f.</math> | |||
The formula is often written with the subscript taking only even values, since the odd Bernoulli numbers are zero except for <math>B_1,</math> in which case we have<ref name=":0" /><ref name="DLMF">{{cite web|url=http://dlmf.nist.gov/2.10|title=Digital Library of Mathematical Functions: Sums and Sequences|publisher=]}}</ref> | |||
:<math>\sum_{i=m}^n f(i) = | |||
\int^n_m f(x)\,dx + \frac{f(n) + f(m)}{2} + | \int^n_m f(x)\,dx + \frac{f(n) + f(m)}{2} + | ||
\sum_{k=1}^{\lfloor p |
\sum_{k=1}^{\left\lfloor \frac{p}{2}\right\rfloor} \frac{B_{2k}}{(2k)!} \left(f^{(2k - 1)}(n) - f^{(2k - 1)}(m)\right) + R_p, | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
or alternatively | or alternatively | ||
<math display=block>\sum_{i=m+1}^n f(i) = | |||
:<math>\sum_{i=m+1}^n f(i) = | |||
\int^n_m f(x)\,dx + \frac{f(n) - f(m)}{2} + | \int^n_m f(x)\,dx + \frac{f(n) - f(m)}{2} + | ||
\sum_{k=1}^{\lfloor p |
\sum_{k=1}^{\left\lfloor \frac{p}{2}\right\rfloor} \frac{B_{2k}}{(2k)!} \left(f^{(2k - 1)}(n) - f^{(2k - 1)}(m)\right) + R_p. | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
===The |
===The remainder term=== | ||
{{see also|Bernoulli polynomials}} | |||
The formula is derived below using repeated integration by parts applied to successive intervals <math></math> for integers <math>r=m, m+1, \cdots, n-1.</math> The derivation uses the periodic Bernoulli functions, <math>P_k(x),</math> which are defined in terms of the ]s <math>B_k(x)</math> for <math>k=0,1,2 \cdots.</math> | |||
The remainder term arises because the integral is usually not exactly equal to the sum. The formula may be derived by applying repeated ] to successive intervals {{math|}} for {{math|''r'' {{=}} ''m'', ''m'' + 1, …, ''n'' − 1}}. The boundary terms in these integrations lead to the main terms of the formula, and the leftover integrals form the remainder term. | |||
The Bernoulli polynomials may be defined recursively by | |||
The remainder term has an exact expression in terms of the periodized Bernoulli functions {{math|''P<sub>k</sub>''(''x'')}}. The Bernoulli polynomials may be defined recursively by {{math|''B''<sub>0</sub>(''x'') {{=}} 1}} and, for {{math|''k'' ≥ 1}}, | |||
:<math>\begin{align} | |||
<math display=block>\begin{align} | |||
B_0(x) &= 1 \\ | |||
B_k'(x) &= kB_{k - 1}(x) \ |
B_k'(x) &= kB_{k - 1}(x), \\ | ||
\int_0^1 B_k(x)\,dx &= 0. | |||
\end{align}</math> | \end{align}</math> | ||
The periodized Bernoulli functions are defined as | |||
<math display=block>P_k(x) = B_k\bigl(x - \lfloor x\rfloor\bigr),</math> | |||
where {{math|⌊''x''⌋}} denotes the largest integer less than or equal to {{mvar|x}}, so that {{math|''x'' − ⌊''x''⌋}} always lies in the interval {{math|[0,1)}}. | |||
With this notation, the remainder term {{mvar|R<sub>p</sub>}} equals | |||
and the periodic Bernoulli functions are defined as | |||
<math display="block">R_{p} = (-1)^{p+1}\int_m^n f^{(p)}(x) \frac{P_p(x)}{p!}\,dx. </math> | |||
When {{math|''k'' > 0}}, it can be shown that for {{math|0 ≤ ''x'' ≤ 1}}, | |||
:<math> P_k(x) = B_k \left(x - \lfloor x\rfloor\right) </math> | |||
<math display=block>\bigl|B_k(x)\bigr| \le \frac{2 \cdot k!}{(2\pi)^k}\zeta(k),</math> | |||
where {{mvar|ζ}} denotes the ]; one approach to prove this inequality is to obtain the Fourier series for the polynomials {{math|''B<sub>k</sub>''(''x'')}}. The bound is achieved for even {{mvar|k}} when {{mvar|x}} is zero. The term {{math|''ζ''(''k'')}} may be omitted for odd {{mvar|k}} but the proof in this case is more complex (see Lehmer).<ref name="Lehmer">{{cite journal|last1=Lehmer|first1=D. H.|author-link=D. H. Lehmer |title=On the maxima and minima of Bernoulli polynomials | date=1940 | journal=]|volume=47|issue=8|pages=533–538 |doi=10.2307/2303833|jstor=2303833}}</ref> Using this inequality, the size of the remainder term can be estimated as | |||
<math display=block>\left|R_p\right| \leq \frac{2 \zeta(p)}{(2\pi)^p}\int_m^n \left|f^{(p)}(x)\right|\,dx.</math> | |||
===Low-order cases=== | |||
where <math>\lfloor x \rfloor</math> denotes the largest integer that is not greater than <math>x</math> so that <math>x - \lfloor x \rfloor</math> always lies in the interval <math>[0,1).</math> | |||
The Bernoulli numbers from {{math|''B''<sub>1</sub>}} to {{math|''B''<sub>7</sub>}} are {{math|{{sfrac|1|2}}, {{sfrac|1|6}}, 0, −{{sfrac|1|30}}, 0, {{sfrac|1|42}}, 0}}. Therefore, the low-order cases of the Euler–Maclaurin formula are: | |||
It can be shown that <math>B_k(1) = B_k(0)</math> for all <math>k \neq 1</math> so that except for <math>P_1(x),</math> all the periodic Bernoulli functions are continuous. The functions <math>P_k(x)</math> are sometimes written as <math>\tilde{B}_k(x).</math> | |||
<math display=block>\begin{align} | |||
\sum_{i=m}^n f(i) - \int_m^n f(x)\,dx &= \frac{f(m)+f(n)}{2} + \int_m^n f'(x)P_1(x)\,dx \\ | |||
&=\frac{f(m)+f(n)}{2} + \frac{1}{6}\frac{f'(n) - f'(m)}{2!} - \int_m^n f''(x)\frac{P_2(x)}{2!}\,dx \\ | |||
&=\frac{f(m)+f(n)}{2} + \frac{1}{6}\frac{f'(n) - f'(m)}{2!} + \int_m^n f'''(x)\frac{P_3(x)}{3!}\,dx \\ | |||
&=\frac{f(m)+f(n)}{2} + \frac{1}{6}\frac{f'(n) - f'(m)}{2!} - \frac{1}{30}\frac{f'''(n) - f'''(m)}{4!}-\int_m^n f^{(4)}(x) \frac{P_4(x)}{4!}\, dx \\ | |||
&=\frac{f(m)+f(n)}{2} + \frac{1}{6}\frac{f'(n) - f'(m)}{2!} - \frac{1}{30}\frac{f'''(n) - f'''(m)}{4!} + \int_m^n f^{(5)}(x)\frac{P_5(x)}{5!}\,dx \\ | |||
&=\frac{f(m)+f(n)}{2} + \frac{1}{6}\frac{f'(n) - f'(m)}{2!} - \frac{1}{30}\frac{f'''(n) - f'''(m)}{4!} + \frac{1}{42}\frac{f^{(5)}(n) - f^{(5)}(m)}{6!} - \int_m^n f^{(6)}(x)\frac{P_6(x)}{6!}\,dx \\ | |||
&=\frac{f(m)+f(n)}{2} + \frac{1}{6}\frac{f'(n) - f'(m)}{2!} - \frac{1}{30}\frac{f'''(n) - f'''(m)}{4!} + \frac{1}{42}\frac{f^{(5)}(n) - f^{(5)}(m)}{6!} + \int_m^n f^{(7)}(x)\frac{P_7(x)}{7!}\,dx. | |||
\end{align}</math> | |||
==Applications== | |||
===The remainder term=== | |||
===The Basel problem=== | |||
The remainder term <math>R</math> can be written as | |||
The ] is to determine the sum | |||
<math display=block> 1 + \frac14 + \frac19 + \frac1{16} + \frac1{25} + \cdots = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n^2}. </math> | |||
Euler computed this sum to 20 decimal places with only a few terms of the Euler–Maclaurin formula in 1735. This probably convinced him that the sum equals {{math|{{sfrac|''π''<sup>2</sup>|6}}}}, which he proved in the same year.<ref>{{cite book | |||
:<math> R = (-1)^{p+1}\int_m^n f^{(p)}(x) {B_{p}(x) \over p!}\,dx. </math> | |||
| last = Pengelley | first = David J. | |||
| arxiv = 1912.03527 | |||
| contribution = Dances between continuous and discrete: Euler's summation formula | |||
| location = Washington, DC | |||
| mr = 2349549 | |||
| pages = 169–189 | |||
| publisher = Mathematical Association of America | |||
| series = MAA Spectrum | |||
| title = Euler at 300 | |||
| year = 2007}}</ref> | |||
===Sums involving a polynomial=== | |||
When <math>k>0,</math> it can be shown that | |||
{{see also|Faulhaber's formula}} | |||
If {{mvar|f}} is a ] and {{mvar|p}} is big enough, then the remainder term vanishes. For instance, if {{math|''f''(''x'') {{=}} ''x''<sup>3</sup>}}, we can choose {{math|''p'' {{=}} 2}} to obtain, after simplification, | |||
<math display=block>\sum_{i=0}^n i^3 = \left(\frac{n(n + 1)}{2}\right)^2.</math> | |||
===Approximation of integrals=== | |||
:<math>\left| B_k (x) \right| \le \frac{2 \cdot k!}{(2\pi)^k}\zeta(k)</math> | |||
The formula provides a means of approximating a finite integral. Let {{math|''a'' < ''b''}} be the endpoints of the interval of integration. Fix {{mvar|N}}, the number of points to use in the approximation, and denote the corresponding step size by {{math|''h'' {{=}} {{sfrac|''b'' − ''a''|''N'' − 1}}}}. Set {{math|''x<sub>i</sub>'' {{=}} ''a'' + (''i'' − 1)''h''}}, so that {{math|''x''<sub>1</sub> {{=}} ''a''}} and {{math|''x<sub>N</sub>'' {{=}} ''b''}}. Then:<ref name="Devries">{{cite book |last1=Devries |first1=Paul L. |last2=Hasbrun |first2=Javier E. |title=A first course in computational physics. |edition=2nd |publisher=Jones and Bartlett Publishers |year=2011 |page=156}}</ref> | |||
<math display=block> | |||
where <math>\zeta</math> denotes the ]; one approach to prove this inequality is to obtain the Fourier series for the polynomials <math>B_k(x).</math> The bound is achieved for even <math>k</math> when <math>x</math> is zero. The term <math>\zeta(k)</math> may be omitted for odd <math>k</math> but the proof in this case is more complex (see Lehmer).<ref name="Lehmer">{{cite journal|last1=Lehmer|first1=D. H. |title=On the maxima and minima of Bernoulli polynomials | date=1940 | journal=The American Mathematical Monthly|volume=47|issue=8|pages=533–538 |doi=10.2307/2303833}}</ref> Using this inequality, the size of the remainder term can be estimated using | |||
:<math>\left|R\right|\leq\frac{2 \zeta (p)}{(2\pi)^{p}}\int_m^n\left|f^{(p)}(x)\right|\ \, dx. </math> | |||
===Applicable formula=== | |||
We can use the formula as a means of approximating a finite integral, with the following simple formula:<ref name="Devries">{{cite book |last1=Devries |first1=Paul L. |last2=Hasbrun |first2=Javier E. |title=A first course in computational physics. |edition=2nd |publisher=Jones and Bartlett Publishers |year=2011 |page=156}}</ref> | |||
:<math> | |||
\begin{align} | \begin{align} | ||
I & = \ |
I & = \int_a^b f(x)\,dx \\ | ||
& |
&\sim h\left(\frac{f(x_1)}{2} + f(x_2) + \cdots + f(x_{N-1}) + \frac{f(x_N)}{2}\right) + \frac{h^2}{12}\bigl - \frac{h^4}{720}\bigl + \cdots | ||
\end{align} | \end{align} | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
This may be viewed as an extension of the ] by the inclusion of correction terms. Note that this asymptotic expansion is usually not convergent; there is some {{mvar|p}}, depending upon {{mvar|f}} and {{mvar|h}}, such that the terms past order {{mvar|p}} increase rapidly. Thus, the remainder term generally demands close attention.<ref name="Devries"/> | |||
where <math>N</math> is the number of points in the interval of integration from <math> x_0 </math> to <math> x_N </math> and <math>h</math> is the distance between points so that <math> h=(x_N - x_0)/N.</math> Note the series above is usually not convergent; indeed, often the terms will increase rapidly after a number of iterations. Thus, attention generally needs to be paid to the remainder term. | |||
This may be viewed as an extension of the ] by the inclusion of correction terms.<ref name="Devries"/> | |||
==Applications== | |||
===The Basel problem=== | |||
The ] asks to determine the sum | |||
:<math> 1 + \frac14 + \frac19 + \frac1{16} + \frac1{25} + \cdots = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n^2}. </math> | |||
Euler computed this sum to 20 decimal places with only a few terms of the Euler–Maclaurin formula in 1735. This probably convinced him that the sum equals <math>\pi^2/6,</math> which he proved in the same year.<ref>Pengelley, David J. , in: Robert Bradley and Ed Sandifer (Eds), ''Proceedings, Euler 2K+2 Conference (Rumford, Maine, 2002)'', ], 2003.</ref> ] for the ] of <math>f(x)=x</math> gives the same result. | |||
===Sums involving a polynomial=== | |||
If <math>f</math> is a ] and <math>p</math> is big enough, then the remainder term vanishes. For instance, if <math>f(x)=x^3,</math> we can choose <math>p=2</math> to obtain after simplification | |||
:<math>\sum_{i=0}^n i^3 = \left(\frac{n(n + 1)}{2}\right)^2</math> | |||
(see ]). | |||
===Numerical integration=== | |||
The Euler–Maclaurin formula is also used for detailed ] in ]. It explains the superior performance of the ] on smooth ]s and is used in certain ]. ] is essentially a change of variables to cast an arbitrary integral in terms of integrals of periodic functions where the Euler–Maclaurin approach is very accurate (in that particular case the Euler–Maclaurin formula takes the form of a ]). This technique is known as a periodizing transformation. | The Euler–Maclaurin formula is also used for detailed ] in ]. It explains the superior performance of the ] on smooth ]s and is used in certain ]. ] is essentially a change of variables to cast an arbitrary integral in terms of integrals of periodic functions where the Euler–Maclaurin approach is very accurate (in that particular case the Euler–Maclaurin formula takes the form of a ]). This technique is known as a periodizing transformation. | ||
===Asymptotic expansion of sums=== | ===Asymptotic expansion of sums=== | ||
In the context of computing ]s of sums and ], usually the most useful form of the Euler–Maclaurin formula is | In the context of computing ]s of sums and ], usually the most useful form of the Euler–Maclaurin formula is | ||
<math display=block>\sum_{n=a}^b f(n) \sim \int_a^b f(x)\,dx + \frac{f(b) + f(a)}{2} + \sum_{k=1}^\infty \,\frac{B_{2k}}{(2k)!} \left(f^{(2k - 1)}(b) - f^{(2k - 1)}(a)\right),</math> | |||
where {{mvar|a}} and {{mvar|b}} are integers.<ref>{{Cite book | editor1-last=Abramowitz | editor1-first=Milton | editor1-link=Milton Abramowitz | editor2-last=Stegun | editor2-first=Irene A. | editor2-link=Irene Stegun | title=] | publisher=] | location=New York | isbn=978-0-486-61272-0 | year=1972 | pages = 16, 806, 886}}</ref> Often the expansion remains valid even after taking the limits {{math|''a'' → −∞}} or {{math|''b'' → +∞}} or both. In many cases the integral on the right-hand side can be evaluated in ] in terms of ]s even though the sum on the left-hand side cannot. Then all the terms in the asymptotic series can be expressed in terms of elementary functions. For example, | |||
:<math>\sum_{n=a}^b f(n) \sim \int_a^b f(x)\,dx + \frac{f(b) + f(a)}{2} + \sum_{k=1}^\infty \,\frac{B_{2k}}{(2k)!} (f^{(2k - 1)}(b) - f^{(2k - 1)}(a))</math> | |||
<math display=block>\sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{(z + k)^2} \sim \underbrace{\int_0^\infty\frac{1}{(z + k)^2}\,dk}_{= \dfrac{1}{z}} + \frac{1}{2z^2} + \sum_{t = 1}^\infty \frac{B_{2t}}{z^{2t + 1}}.</math> | |||
Here the left-hand side is equal to {{math|''ψ''<sup>(1)</sup>(''z'')}}, namely the first-order ] defined by | |||
where <math>a</math> and <math>b</math> are integers.<ref>{{harvtxt|Abramowitz|Stegun|1972}}, 23.1.30</ref> Often the expansion remains valid even after taking the limits <math>a\rightarrow-\infty</math> or <math>b\rightarrow +\infty</math> or both. In many cases the integral on the right-hand side can be evaluated in ] in terms of ]s even though the sum on the left-hand side cannot. Then all the terms in the asymptotic series can be expressed in terms of elementary functions. For example, | |||
:<math>\psi^{(1)}(z) = \frac{d^2}{dz^2}\log \Gamma(z);</math> | |||
the ] {{math|Γ(''z'')}} is equal to {{math|(''z'' − 1)!}} when {{mvar|z}} is a ]. This results in an asymptotic expansion for {{math|''ψ''<sup>(1)</sup>(''z'')}}. That expansion, in turn, serves as the starting point for one of the derivations of precise error estimates for ] of the ] function. | |||
====Examples==== | |||
:<math>\sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{(z + k)^2} \sim \underbrace{\int_0^\infty\frac{1}{(z + k)^2}\,dk}_{= 1/z} + \frac{1}{2z^2} + \sum_{t = 1}^\infty \frac{B_{2t}}{z^{2t + 1}}.</math> | |||
If {{mvar|s}} is an integer greater than 1 we have: | |||
<math display=block>\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{k^s} \approx \frac 1{s-1}+\frac 12-\frac 1{(s-1)n^{s-1}}+\frac 1{2n^s}+\sum_{i=1}\frac{B_{2i}}{(2i)!}\left.</math> | |||
Collecting the constants into a value of the ], we can write an asymptotic expansion: | |||
Here the left-hand side is equal to <math>\psi^{(1)}(z),</math> namely the first-order ] defined through <math>\psi^{(1)}(z) = D^2( \log \Gamma(z) ); </math> the ] <math>\Gamma(z) </math> is equal to <math>(z-1)! </math> if <math>z </math> is a ]. This results in an asymptotic expansion for <math>\psi^{(1)}(z). </math> That expansion, in turn, serves as the starting point for one of the derivations of precise error estimates for ] of the ] function. | |||
<math display=block>\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{k^s} \sim\zeta(s)-\frac 1{(s-1)n^{s-1}}+\frac 1{2n^s}-\sum_{i=1}\frac{B_{2i}}{(2i)!}\frac{(s+2i-2)!}{(s-1)!n^{s+2i-1}}.</math> | |||
For {{mvar|s}} equal to 2 this simplifies to | |||
===Examples=== | |||
<math display=block>\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{k^2} \sim\zeta(2)-\frac 1n+\frac 1{2n^2}-\sum_{i=1}\frac{B_{2i}}{n^{2i+1}},</math> | |||
or | |||
*]s: | |||
<math display=block>\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{k^2} \sim \frac{\pi^2}{6} -\frac{1}{n} +\frac{1}{2n^2} -\frac{1}{6n^3}+\frac{1}{30n^5}-\frac{1}{42n^7} + \cdots.</math> | |||
When {{math|''s'' {{=}} 1}}, the corresponding technique gives an asymptotic expansion for the ]s: | |||
:: <math>\begin{align} | |||
\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{k} |
<math display=block>\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{k} \sim \gamma + \log n + \frac{1}{2n} - \sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{B_{2k}}{2kn^{2k}},</math> | ||
where {{math|''γ'' ≈ 0.5772...}} is the ]. | |||
&\approx \log n + \gamma +\frac{1}{2n} -\frac{1}{12n^2} + \frac{1}{120n^4} - \frac{1}{252n^6} | |||
\end{align}</math> | |||
: where <math>\gamma \approx 0.5772156649015328606065</math> is the ], | |||
*<math>\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{k^2} \approx \frac{\pi^2}{6} -\frac{1}{n} +\frac{1}{2n^2} -\frac{1}{6n^3}+\frac{1}{30n^5}-\frac{1}{42n^7}. </math> | |||
== Proofs == | == Proofs == | ||
=== Derivation by mathematical induction === | === Derivation by mathematical induction === | ||
We |
We outline the argument given in Apostol.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal| first = T. M. | title = An Elementary View of Euler's Summation Formula | journal = ] | volume = 106 | date = 1 May 1999 | issue = 5 | pages = 409–418 | issn = 0002-9890| last = Apostol | doi = 10.2307/2589145| author-link= Tom M. Apostol| publisher = Mathematical Association of America| jstor = 2589145}}</ref> | ||
The ] {{math|''B<sub>n</sub>''(''x'')}} and the periodic Bernoulli functions {{math|''P<sub>n</sub>''(''x'')}} for {{math|''n'' {{=}} 0, 1, 2, ...}} were introduced above. | The ] {{math|''B<sub>n</sub>''(''x'')}} and the periodic Bernoulli functions {{math|''P<sub>n</sub>''(''x'')}} for {{math|''n'' {{=}} 0, 1, 2, ...}} were introduced above. | ||
The first several Bernoulli polynomials are | The first several Bernoulli polynomials are | ||
<math display=block>\begin{align} | |||
B_0(x) &= 1, \\ | |||
:<math>\begin{align} | |||
B_1(x) &= x - \ |
B_1(x) &= x - \tfrac{1}{2}, \\ | ||
B_2(x) &= x^2 - x + \ |
B_2(x) &= x^2 - x + \tfrac{1}{6}, \\ | ||
B_3(x) &= x^3 - \ |
B_3(x) &= x^3 - \tfrac{3}{2}x^2 + \tfrac{1}{2}x, \\ | ||
B_4(x) &= x^4 - 2x^3 + x^2 - \ |
B_4(x) &= x^4 - 2x^3 + x^2 - \tfrac{1}{30}, \\ | ||
& |
&\,\,\,\vdots | ||
\end{align}</math> | \end{align}</math> | ||
The values {{math|''B<sub>n</sub>''( |
The values {{math|''B<sub>n</sub>''(1)}} are the ] {{math|''B''<sub>''n''</sub>}}. Notice that for {{math|''n'' ≠ 1}} we have | ||
<math display=block>B_n = B_n(1) = B_n(0),</math> | |||
and for {{math|''n'' {{=}} 1}}, | |||
:<math>B_n(0) = B_n(1) = B_n\quad(n\text{th Bernoulli number})</math> | |||
<math display=block>B_1 = B_1(1) = -B_1(0).</math> | |||
For {{math|''n'' {{=}} 1}}, | |||
:<math> B_1(0) = -B_1(1) = B_1</math> | |||
The functions {{math|''P''<sub>''n''</sub>}} agree with the Bernoulli polynomials on the interval {{math|}} and are ] with period 1. Furthermore, except when {{math|''n'' {{=}} 1}}, they are also continuous. Thus, | The functions {{math|''P''<sub>''n''</sub>}} agree with the Bernoulli polynomials on the interval {{math|}} and are ] with period 1. Furthermore, except when {{math|''n'' {{=}} 1}}, they are also continuous. Thus, | ||
<math display=block> P_n(0) = P_n(1) = B_n \quad \text{for }n \neq 1.</math> | |||
:<math> P_n(0) = P_n(1) = B_n \quad (n \neq 1)</math> | |||
Let {{math|''k''}} be an integer, and consider the integral | Let {{math|''k''}} be an integer, and consider the integral | ||
<math display=block> \int_k^{k + 1} f(x)\,dx = \int_k^{k + 1} u\,dv,</math> | |||
:<math> \int_k^{k + 1} f(x)\,dx = \int_k^{k + 1} u\,dv</math> | |||
where | where | ||
<math display=block>\begin{align} | |||
u &= f(x), \\ | |||
:<math>\begin{align} | |||
|
du &= f'(x)\,dx, \\ | ||
|
dv &= P_0(x)\,dx & \text{since }P_0(x) &= 1, \\ | ||
v &= P_1(x). | |||
dv &= P_0(x)\,dx && \text{since }P_0(x) = 1 \\ | |||
v &= P_1(x) | |||
\end{align}</math> | \end{align}</math> | ||
], we get | ], we get | ||
<math display=block>\begin{align} | |||
\int_k^{k + 1} f(x)\,dx &= \bigl_k^{k + 1} - \int_k^{k + 1} v\,du \\ | |||
:<math>\begin{align} | |||
&= \bigl_k^{k + 1} - \int_k^{k+1} f'(x)P_1(x)\,dx \\ | |||
&= |
&= B_1(1)f(k+1)-B_1(0)f(k) - \int_k^{k+1} f'(x)P_1(x)\,dx. | ||
&= B_1(1)f(k+1)-B_1(0)f(k) - \int_k^{k+1} f'(x)P_1(x)\,dx | |||
\end{align}</math> | \end{align}</math> | ||
Using |
Using {{math|''B''<sub>1</sub>(0) {{=}} −{{sfrac|1|2}}}}, {{math|''B''<sub>1</sub>(1) {{=}} {{sfrac|1|2}}}}, and summing the above from {{math|''k'' {{=}} 0}} to {{math|''k'' {{=}} ''n'' − 1}}, we get | ||
<math display=block>\begin{align} | |||
\int_0^n f(x)\, dx &= \int_0^1 f(x)\,dx + \cdots + \int_{n-1}^n f(x)\,dx \\ | |||
:<math>\begin{align} | |||
\ |
&= \frac{f(0)}{2}+ f(1) + \dotsb + f(n-1) + \frac{f(n)}{2} - \int_0^n f'(x) P_1(x)\,dx. | ||
&= \frac{f(0)}{2}+ f(1) + \dotsb + f(n-1) + {f(n) \over 2} - \int_0^n f'(x) P_1(x)\,dx | |||
\end{align}</math> | \end{align}</math> | ||
Adding |
Adding {{math|{{sfrac|''f''(''n'') − ''f''(0)|2}}}} to both sides and rearranging, we have | ||
<math display=block> \sum_{k=1}^n f(k) = \int_0^n f(x)\,dx + \frac{f(n) - f(0)}{2} + \int_0^n f'(x) P_1(x)\,dx.</math> | |||
:<math> \sum_{k=1}^n f(k) = \int_0^n f(x)\,dx + {f(n) - f(0) \over 2} + \int_0^n f'(x) P_1(x)\,dx\qquad (1)</math> | |||
The last two terms therefore give the error when the integral is taken to approximate the sum. | |||
Next, consider | |||
:<math> \int_k^{k+1} f'(x)P_1(x)\,dx = \int_k^{k + 1} u\,dv </math> | |||
This is the {{math|''p'' {{=}} 1}} case of the summation formula. To continue the induction, we apply integration by parts to the error term: | |||
<math display=block>\int_k^{k+1} f'(x)P_1(x)\,dx = \int_k^{k + 1} u\,dv,</math> | |||
where | where | ||
<math display=block>\begin{align} | |||
u &= f'(x), \\ | |||
:<math>\begin{align} | |||
|
du &= f''(x)\,dx, \\ | ||
|
dv &= P_1(x)\,dx, \\ | ||
|
v &= \tfrac{1}{2}P_2(x). | ||
v &= \frac{1}{2}P_2(x) | |||
\end{align}</math> | \end{align}</math> | ||
The result of integrating by parts is | |||
Integrating by parts again, we get | |||
<math display=block>\begin{align} | |||
\bigl_k^{k + 1} - \int_k^{k + 1} v\,du &= \left_k^{k+1} - \frac{1}{2}\int_k^{k+1} f''(x)P_2(x)\,dx \\ | |||
:<math>\begin{align} | |||
|
&= \frac{B_2}{2}(f'(k + 1) - f'(k)) - \frac{1}{2}\int_k^{k + 1} f''(x)P_2(x)\,dx. | ||
&= {B_2 \over 2}(f'(k + 1) - f'(k)) - {1 \over 2}\int_k^{k + 1} f''(x)P_2(x)\,dx | |||
\end{align}</math> | \end{align}</math> | ||
Summing from {{math|''k'' {{=}} 0}} to {{math|''k'' {{=}} ''n'' − 1}} and substituting this for the lower order error term results in the {{math|''p'' {{=}} 2}} case of the formula, | |||
<math display=block>\sum_{k=1}^n f(k) = \int_0^n f(x)\,dx + \frac{f(n) - f(0)}{2} + \frac{B_2}{2}\bigl(f'(n) - f'(0)\bigr) - \frac{1}{2}\int_0^n f''(x)P_2(x)\,dx.</math> | |||
:<math> \sum_{k=1}^n f(k) = \int_0^n f(x)\,dx + {f(n) - f(0) \over 2} + \frac{B_2}{2}(f'(n) - f'(0)) - {1 \over 2}\int_0^n f''(x)P_2(x)\,dx. </math> | |||
This process can be iterated. In this way we get a proof of the Euler–Maclaurin summation formula which can be formalized by ], in which the induction step relies on integration by parts and on identities for periodic Bernoulli functions. | |||
<!--Commented out because it's imprecise and contains false information. In order to get bounds on the size of the error when the sum is approximated by the integral, we note that the Bernoulli polynomials on the interval attain their maximum absolute values at the endpoints (see Lehmer in references below), and the value ''B<sub>n</sub>''(1) is the ''n''th ].--> | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Line 218: | Line 202: | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
== |
==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
== |
==Further reading== | ||
{{refbegin |
{{refbegin}} | ||
* {{cite journal|first1= H. W. |last1=Gould | first2=William | last2=Squire | title = Maclaurin's second formula and its generalization | year=1963| journal=Amer. Math. Monthly | volume=70 | number=1 | pages=44–52| jstor=2312783 | mr=0146551 | doi=10.2307/2312783}} | |||
* {{Cite book | editor1-last=Abramowitz | editor1-first=Milton | editor1-link=Milton Abramowitz | editor2-last=Stegun | editor2-first=Irene A. | editor2-link=Irene Stegun | title=] | publisher=] | location=New York | isbn=978-0-486-61272-0 | year=1972 | id=tenth printing | ref=harv }}, pp. 16, 806, 886 | |||
* {{cite web|last1=Gourdon | first1=Xavier|last2=Sebah|first2=Pascal |url=http://numbers.computation.free.fr/Constants/Miscellaneous/bernoulli.html |title= Introduction on Bernoulli's numbers|year=2002}} | |||
* {{MathWorld|title=Euler–Maclaurin Integration Formulas|urlname=Euler-MaclaurinIntegrationFormulas}} | |||
* {{cite journal|first1=Erich | last1=Martensen | title= On the generalized Euler-Maclaurin formula|journal=Z. Angew. Math. Mech. | volume =85 | number=12 | pages=858–863 | doi=10.1002/zamm.200410217 | mr=2184846 | year=2005| bibcode=2005ZaMM...85..858M | s2cid=123419717 }} | |||
* Gourdon, Xavier; Sebah, Pascal '''', (2002) | |||
* {{cite book | first1=Hugh L. | |
* {{cite book | first1=Hugh L. |last1=Montgomery | author-link=Hugh Montgomery (mathematician) |first2=Robert C. |last2=Vaughan |author-link2=Robert Charles Vaughan (mathematician) | title=Multiplicative number theory I. Classical theory | series=Cambridge tracts in advanced mathematics | volume=97 | year=2007 | isbn=978-0-521-84903-6 | pages=495–519}} | ||
{{refend}} | {{refend}} | ||
==External links== | |||
* {{MathWorld|title=Euler–Maclaurin Integration Formulas|urlname=Euler-MaclaurinIntegrationFormulas}} | |||
{{Leonhard Euler}} | |||
{{Calculus topics}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Euler-Maclaurin Formula}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:Euler-Maclaurin Formula}} | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] |
Latest revision as of 21:21, 15 October 2024
Summation formulaIn mathematics, the Euler–Maclaurin formula is a formula for the difference between an integral and a closely related sum. It can be used to approximate integrals by finite sums, or conversely to evaluate finite sums and infinite series using integrals and the machinery of calculus. For example, many asymptotic expansions are derived from the formula, and Faulhaber's formula for the sum of powers is an immediate consequence.
The formula was discovered independently by Leonhard Euler and Colin Maclaurin around 1735. Euler needed it to compute slowly converging infinite series while Maclaurin used it to calculate integrals. It was later generalized to Darboux's formula.
The formula
If m and n are natural numbers and f(x) is a real or complex valued continuous function for real numbers x in the interval , then the integral can be approximated by the sum (or vice versa) (see rectangle method). The Euler–Maclaurin formula provides expressions for the difference between the sum and the integral in terms of the higher derivatives f(x) evaluated at the endpoints of the interval, that is to say x = m and x = n.
Explicitly, for p a positive integer and a function f(x) that is p times continuously differentiable on the interval , we have where Bk is the kth Bernoulli number (with B1 = 1/2) and Rp is an error term which depends on n, m, p, and f and is usually small for suitable values of p.
The formula is often written with the subscript taking only even values, since the odd Bernoulli numbers are zero except for B1. In this case we have or alternatively
The remainder term
See also: Bernoulli polynomialsThe remainder term arises because the integral is usually not exactly equal to the sum. The formula may be derived by applying repeated integration by parts to successive intervals for r = m, m + 1, …, n − 1. The boundary terms in these integrations lead to the main terms of the formula, and the leftover integrals form the remainder term.
The remainder term has an exact expression in terms of the periodized Bernoulli functions Pk(x). The Bernoulli polynomials may be defined recursively by B0(x) = 1 and, for k ≥ 1, The periodized Bernoulli functions are defined as where ⌊x⌋ denotes the largest integer less than or equal to x, so that x − ⌊x⌋ always lies in the interval [0,1).
With this notation, the remainder term Rp equals
When k > 0, it can be shown that for 0 ≤ x ≤ 1, where ζ denotes the Riemann zeta function; one approach to prove this inequality is to obtain the Fourier series for the polynomials Bk(x). The bound is achieved for even k when x is zero. The term ζ(k) may be omitted for odd k but the proof in this case is more complex (see Lehmer). Using this inequality, the size of the remainder term can be estimated as
Low-order cases
The Bernoulli numbers from B1 to B7 are 1/2, 1/6, 0, −1/30, 0, 1/42, 0. Therefore, the low-order cases of the Euler–Maclaurin formula are:
Applications
The Basel problem
The Basel problem is to determine the sum
Euler computed this sum to 20 decimal places with only a few terms of the Euler–Maclaurin formula in 1735. This probably convinced him that the sum equals π/6, which he proved in the same year.
Sums involving a polynomial
See also: Faulhaber's formulaIf f is a polynomial and p is big enough, then the remainder term vanishes. For instance, if f(x) = x, we can choose p = 2 to obtain, after simplification,
Approximation of integrals
The formula provides a means of approximating a finite integral. Let a < b be the endpoints of the interval of integration. Fix N, the number of points to use in the approximation, and denote the corresponding step size by h = b − a/N − 1. Set xi = a + (i − 1)h, so that x1 = a and xN = b. Then:
This may be viewed as an extension of the trapezoid rule by the inclusion of correction terms. Note that this asymptotic expansion is usually not convergent; there is some p, depending upon f and h, such that the terms past order p increase rapidly. Thus, the remainder term generally demands close attention.
The Euler–Maclaurin formula is also used for detailed error analysis in numerical quadrature. It explains the superior performance of the trapezoidal rule on smooth periodic functions and is used in certain extrapolation methods. Clenshaw–Curtis quadrature is essentially a change of variables to cast an arbitrary integral in terms of integrals of periodic functions where the Euler–Maclaurin approach is very accurate (in that particular case the Euler–Maclaurin formula takes the form of a discrete cosine transform). This technique is known as a periodizing transformation.
Asymptotic expansion of sums
In the context of computing asymptotic expansions of sums and series, usually the most useful form of the Euler–Maclaurin formula is
where a and b are integers. Often the expansion remains valid even after taking the limits a → −∞ or b → +∞ or both. In many cases the integral on the right-hand side can be evaluated in closed form in terms of elementary functions even though the sum on the left-hand side cannot. Then all the terms in the asymptotic series can be expressed in terms of elementary functions. For example,
Here the left-hand side is equal to ψ(z), namely the first-order polygamma function defined by
the gamma function Γ(z) is equal to (z − 1)! when z is a positive integer. This results in an asymptotic expansion for ψ(z). That expansion, in turn, serves as the starting point for one of the derivations of precise error estimates for Stirling's approximation of the factorial function.
Examples
If s is an integer greater than 1 we have:
Collecting the constants into a value of the Riemann zeta function, we can write an asymptotic expansion:
For s equal to 2 this simplifies to or
When s = 1, the corresponding technique gives an asymptotic expansion for the harmonic numbers: where γ ≈ 0.5772... is the Euler–Mascheroni constant.
Proofs
Derivation by mathematical induction
We outline the argument given in Apostol.
The Bernoulli polynomials Bn(x) and the periodic Bernoulli functions Pn(x) for n = 0, 1, 2, ... were introduced above.
The first several Bernoulli polynomials are
The values Bn(1) are the Bernoulli numbers Bn. Notice that for n ≠ 1 we have and for n = 1,
The functions Pn agree with the Bernoulli polynomials on the interval and are periodic with period 1. Furthermore, except when n = 1, they are also continuous. Thus,
Let k be an integer, and consider the integral where
Integrating by parts, we get
Using B1(0) = −1/2, B1(1) = 1/2, and summing the above from k = 0 to k = n − 1, we get
Adding f(n) − f(0)/2 to both sides and rearranging, we have
This is the p = 1 case of the summation formula. To continue the induction, we apply integration by parts to the error term: where
The result of integrating by parts is
Summing from k = 0 to k = n − 1 and substituting this for the lower order error term results in the p = 2 case of the formula,
This process can be iterated. In this way we get a proof of the Euler–Maclaurin summation formula which can be formalized by mathematical induction, in which the induction step relies on integration by parts and on identities for periodic Bernoulli functions.
See also
- Cesàro summation
- Euler summation
- Gauss–Kronrod quadrature formula
- Darboux's formula
- Euler–Boole summation
References
- ^ Apostol, T. M. (1 May 1999). "An Elementary View of Euler's Summation Formula". The American Mathematical Monthly. 106 (5). Mathematical Association of America: 409–418. doi:10.2307/2589145. ISSN 0002-9890. JSTOR 2589145.
- "Digital Library of Mathematical Functions: Sums and Sequences". National Institute of Standards and Technology.
- Lehmer, D. H. (1940). "On the maxima and minima of Bernoulli polynomials". The American Mathematical Monthly. 47 (8): 533–538. doi:10.2307/2303833. JSTOR 2303833.
- Pengelley, David J. (2007). "Dances between continuous and discrete: Euler's summation formula". Euler at 300. MAA Spectrum. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America. pp. 169–189. arXiv:1912.03527. MR 2349549.
- ^ Devries, Paul L.; Hasbrun, Javier E. (2011). A first course in computational physics (2nd ed.). Jones and Bartlett Publishers. p. 156.
- Abramowitz, Milton; Stegun, Irene A., eds. (1972). Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. New York: Dover Publications. pp. 16, 806, 886. ISBN 978-0-486-61272-0.
Further reading
- Gould, H. W.; Squire, William (1963). "Maclaurin's second formula and its generalization". Amer. Math. Monthly. 70 (1): 44–52. doi:10.2307/2312783. JSTOR 2312783. MR 0146551.
- Gourdon, Xavier; Sebah, Pascal (2002). "Introduction on Bernoulli's numbers".
- Martensen, Erich (2005). "On the generalized Euler-Maclaurin formula". Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 85 (12): 858–863. Bibcode:2005ZaMM...85..858M. doi:10.1002/zamm.200410217. MR 2184846. S2CID 123419717.
- Montgomery, Hugh L.; Vaughan, Robert C. (2007). Multiplicative number theory I. Classical theory. Cambridge tracts in advanced mathematics. Vol. 97. pp. 495–519. ISBN 978-0-521-84903-6.
External links
Calculus | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Precalculus | |||||
Limits | |||||
Differential calculus |
| ||||
Integral calculus | |||||
Vector calculus |
| ||||
Multivariable calculus | |||||
Sequences and series |
| ||||
Special functions and numbers | |||||
History of calculus | |||||
Lists |
| ||||
Miscellaneous topics |
|