Misplaced Pages

Talk:The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:53, 1 October 2006 editTKD (talk | contribs)23,353 edits →Absurd requests for references or sources.: different matter← Previous edit Latest revision as of 00:12, 19 November 2024 edit undoQuicoleJR (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers14,617 edits Notification: listing of Stock Pot Inn at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle 
(373 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Article history
{{skiptotoctalk}}
|action1=PR
{{featured}}
|action1date=02:22, 9 December 2005
{{Mainpage date|October 1|2006}}
|action1link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask/archive2
{{talkheader}}
|action1result=reviewed
{{oldpeerreview}}
|action1oldid=30652455
{{zeldaproj|class=FA|importance=Top}}
{{cvgproj|class=FA|importance=mid|selected=yes}}


|action2=FAC
==Masks==
|action2date=01:06, 19 December 2005
Well, now that I've made a more indepth mask section, can I delete the previous one, or is mine a bit too much?
|action2link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask/archive1
:The previous section probably shouldn't be completely deleted. I combined the two for now. --] 01:32, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
|action2result=promoted
|action2oldid=31810179


|action3=FAR
== 10 feet tall? ==
|action3date=January 4, 2006
|action3link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article removal candidates/The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask
|action3result=demoted
|action3oldid=33910571


|action4=FAC
This may be slightly unimportant, but I don't think the Fierce Diety mask makes Link 10 feet tall, this is an exaggeration. The Fierce Diety mask uses a similar player model to that of adult Link in ''Ocarina of Time'', and adult Link isn't that tall!
|action4date=21:28, 18 January 2006
|action4link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask
|action4result=promoted
|action4oldid=35722576


|action5=FTC
:While the Fierce Deity model is based on the Adult Link one in shape, its size is in fact much larger. Try standing next to a wall with brick work (so you have horizontal lines) such as in the room for Odalwa, the first boss, and change from Link's various forms into FD and you will notice quite a difference. He is more than twice as tall as Link, and considerably taller than Zora Link. However 10 foot is, as far as I am aware, just an estimation, and I shall reword the info for the mask and a couple of others. ] 14:46, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
|action5date=22:54, 4 May 2008
|action5link=Misplaced Pages:Featured topic candidates/The Legend of Zelda titles
|action5result=promoted
|action5oldid=210182789


|action6=FAR
::Well, if we guesstimate that Adult Link was 6ft, and Fierce Deity is even bigger as mentioned, 10 foot may not be far off, but it should be changed, not because it "sounds" wrong (a 10-ft-high person, out of context, sounds exaggerated) but since there is no unrefutable ingame proof. What would be nice is if someone with the *coughemulatedcough* game could make a screenshot montage with Child Link and Oni Link side by side, to show users the height difference. Heck, a height guesstimate could be made using that by counting the pixels!
|action6date=14:34, 11 July 2008
::So if someone could make that and make it fit nicely on the page, it would probably be very helpful. In the meantime I'll see if I can get my hands on the Oni Link promotional art I saw a while back. ] 11:08, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
|action6link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask/archive1
|action6result=kept
|action6oldid=224958887


|action7=FTR
:::My bad, it's gone now. But even so a comparison shot could be nice. ] 11:25, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
|action7date=21:05, 31 March 2010
|action7link=Misplaced Pages:Featured topic removal candidates/The Legend of Zelda titles/archive1
|action7result=demoted
|action7oldid=353231604


|action8=FAR
:::: As a side note, everything in cyberspace has no height at all. Absolutely none. IF things had size, computers would be huge.
|action8date=23:09, 20 August 2010
|action8link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask/archive2
|action8result=kept
|action8oldid=379830019


|maindate=October 1, 2006
Stand next to someone in town, then you'll really see how tall he is..
|currentstatus=FA
I would say... 9 or 10 feet. ] 09:35, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
|action9 = FAR
|action9date = 2024-11-08
|action9link = Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask/archive3
|action9result = kept
|action9oldid = 1252231292
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=FA|
{{WikiProject Video games|class=FA|importance=Mid|Nintendo=yes}}
}}
{{refideas
|1= https://archive.org/details/the-legend-of-zelda-majoras-mask-complete-guide-book-ntt-publishing
|2= https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Legend_of_Zelda_Majora_s_Mask/7g8FEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1
|3=https://web.archive.org/web/20141008002302/http://www.officialnintendomagazine.co.uk/2633/features/zelda-the-man-behind-the-legend/
}}
{{Archives}}


__TOC__
:This is both difficult to verify and completely unimportant. How about we just say "large"? ] 10:45, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


==]==
== Oath to Order/Ode of Order ==
Many unsourced sentences, paragraphs, and sections. ] (]) 10:06, 11 December 2022 (UTC)


== Sourcing Issues ==
Are there versions of the game that display this song in the inventory as "Ode of Order"? I just checked my version (Zelda Collector's Edition, Gamecube) and it clearly shows "Oath to Order" after it's played and in the inventory. I found an N64 screenshot showing "Oath to Order" <del>here</del>. ] 09:59, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
:<small>Link removed per spam filter request. ] ] 12:55, 7 April 2006 (UTC)</small>


:Not having the actual game, I relied on various hint/cheat sites to verify the correct word. I (and they) could definitely be wrong for at least some games. Maybe we should replace 'Ode' with 'Ode/Oath'? ] ] 04:06, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC) This article seems to be lacking sources for some sections, mainly the gameplay and plot. I don't really know what sources would be best for this, while avoiding stuff like fan sites. ] (]) 14:24, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
:Agreed, this needs work. This featured article should be reviewed as it has several large sections with missing citations. ] (]) 05:40, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
::Yeah, I'm very new at dealing with stuff like this but it seems to me like it should be reviewed. I've made a start on it and added a couple of sources, but it still needs more work. ] (]) 15:45, 9 August 2023 (UTC)


== Marketing budget ==
::They could be mistranslations or older versions, but I'm not sure which. A Google search for ''Zelda "Oath to Order"'' shows 600+ links, while ''Zelda "Ode of Order"'' shows only two, one of which is a dupe of this article. ] 04:50, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)


] do you know where to put this? $8 million. ] (]) 23:17, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
:::Sometimes games (not necessarily Zelda) are revised for a different region, changing words if they are "wrong" in that region. So say a game mentioned ], it'd probably be changed to ] for non-US countries. However I don't think Oath/Ode would be inapplicable in ANY English-speaking country...
:That would be fodder for a release section. If there's more to build in it, I usually migrate sales to that and put such sections before the critical reception. ] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 13:33, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

::I've put it before the "Technical differences from Ocarina of Time" section for now. ] (]) 14:56, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
:::There was some de-religion-ising in revised versions of OOT (removal of Muslim symbol, alteration of song based off Muslim chant, etc.) so it could be that this game too had content changed. Maybe someone thought "Ode" alluded to praying to/singing to a god or something like that, I don't know.
== "]" listed at ] ==

]
:::So one of those is possibly the answer. You could always ask at the 1964 emulator forum or something, and I'm sure they'd tell you which ROM revisions featured it, and whether or not it had been altered for the GC versions. ] 11:22, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 14#Zelda 6}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 15:02, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

== "]" listed at ] ==
::::I know this is a year late, but if anybody is wondering, this is probably because the spanish version of the game does, in fact, read "''Ode to Order''" (note the ''to'', not ''of''). The other song name change I can recall is that "''New Wave Bossa Nova''" was simply ''"New Bossa Nova''". By the way, as far as I have seen, there wasn't any removal of anything in ''Majora's Mask''... which is probably why it feels so "dark". Maybe just the translation of 'Oni' to 'Fierce Deity', but Fierce Deity actually SOUNDS darker (it's just a fancy way of saying "evil god", after all.) --] 14:09, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
]

The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 21#Four Giants}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <span style="font-family:Segoe Script">]</span><span style="font-size:115%">]</span> 10:48, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
==Lack of Screenshots==
== "]" listed at ] ==

]
It'd be nice if someone could take some shots of the game, preferably with your console hooked to the computer through a TV tuner (although, a rom would be an alright alternative). :3 -- ] 23:25, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 19#Latte Milk Bar}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 00:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

== "]" listed at ] ==
:Emulated screenshots are the purest and the ideal, as long as the game is run at original resolution (640x480?) and with all enhancements (Super2xSaI, antialiasing, etc.) turned off.
]
:Alternately, using unwatermarked press pack screenshots would be fine, but of course then it's limited to only what Ninty screenshotted. ]<sup>]</sup> 23:36, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 19#Stock Pot Inn}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 00:12, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
:What about the TV tuner idea? I mean, if it could be done, shouldn't it be done as such? -- ] 00:10, July 11, 2005 (UTC)
::Using a TV tuner passes the graphics through several lossy transformations, resulting in a marked decrease in quality. Emulation screenshots are better as long as the emulator is accurate. High density or progressive scan output is also better for very recent games which support it, but requires more expensive TV tuners to capture. ] 10:48, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

== What is Zelda Gaiden?? ==

"Gaiden" means "sidestory" (approximately) in Japanese. It was the development title for Majora's Mask. (It is, after all, a sidestory.) ] 07:30, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

Wasn't THe Legend of Zelda Gaiden originally for the 64DD as an expansion for the Ocarina of Time, (like the Ura Zelda), Zelda Gaiden, would include a different overworld and a new adventure. And the project was cancelled due to the lack of popularity of the 64DD, Nintendo decided just to make Zelda Gaiden a stand alone game the Majora's Mask. And the Ura Zelda was added to a special 'Master Quest' for Gamecube.

This website would explan it better
http://www.japan-101.com/video_games/ura_zelda.htm

== Interesting intentions ==

I may be twenty-four years old, but I am currently playing ''Majora's Mask'', and due to this, I have attained knowledge that I am positive will be informative and rewarding to this article. Also, I am a Wikipedian who contributes to articles that eventually receive ], this desire coming from improving Misplaced Pages on a daily basis. This is a campaign I have started outside Misplaced Pages boundaries. So first and foremost, this article should begin citing its sources and references. --] 14:51, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

:I can't see what references or sources one would need to add or cite (except maybe the EGM award, one can cite where they found that information). The Wikipedians probably wrote this entire article on their own, from their own knowledge of the game. I, myself, know enough about the game to write an article like this one. -- ] 15:52, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

::Some of what you have edited thus far is...somewhat odd. For one, you erased the "Fixed 3d|3D" pipe, so now it just says "Fixed 3d", which looks bad. Second, on the Ocarina Songs, you decapitalized all the first letter after the &mdash-es. They need to be caps. That's what I found so far by skimming your edits. Other parts you changed look good so far. -- ] 16:16, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

:::"3D" is unnecessary, as it is too vague compared to "Fixed 3d", which gives the reader a better vision of the game's appearance. Also, the "caps lock on the first letters" is not true standard English, but your point will not be ignored, as it does make some sense. Now on to the issue with references: if no references are added to the article, then it will not be able to achieve featured status. Looking at the article as a whole right now, I would add references for what is presumed in the game, like the fact that the beginning of the game could be located in the Lost Woods. There should also be a reference of the storyline, for readers (and whiny Wikipedians) not to assume that we have made it up. Believe me, I had a friend who went through the featured article process, and it was no walk in the park for her. You might want to check out ], where practically every line is being referenced. --] 17:28, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

::::I have accomplished excessive editing and removed the "Trivia" section from the article, which is better suited for a fan site or something along the lines of that. I will be seeking references and hope to finish the article in time for a nomination in the near future. --] 17:53, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

:::::Good luck. I'll give the article a look-over and see if I can do anything with it. -- ] 18:40, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

::::Does anyone know where I can access images from the video game? I'm quite stumped with internet locations (regrettably). --] 14:02, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

:::I have located a minimal number of images. --] 20:33, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

::::What images do you still need? I can try to get some. -- ] 20:57, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

:::::An image of Deku Link would be admirable &mdash; since the main character spends the beginning of the game in this form, I find it rather acceptable for its presence. If that can't be found on the internet, then perhaps an image of one of the side characters (Romani, Anju, Kafei, Gorman, etc.) or one of the landscape to exhibit Termina's soils and grounds. Then there's the greedy me who would prefer both. Those are just my suggestions, but I do think that they would add the most variety. --] 00:50, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

Here's some images that I got, some of them have bad brightness, but whatever...:

http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/5382/smaskusnap00901ru.jpg - Majora, Tatl and Tatl

http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/589/smaskusnap00913yc.jpg - Deku Link with Tatl

http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/73/smaskusnap00920cl.jpg - Deku Link in light

http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/6822/smaskusnap00938do.jpg - Deku Link on Deku Flower

http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/6215/smaskusnap00959vz.jpg - Deku Link Horror Reflection

http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/2228/smaskusnap00969xn.jpg - Deku Link 3rd Day Clocktower Battle

http://img464.imageshack.us/img464/6835/smaskusnap01018vk.jpg - Termina Field (botched sun for some reason)

http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/2585/smaskusnap00985sn.jpg - Deku Link in Tatl's Light

:"Deku Link on Deku Flower" amuses me; do you have the copyright information, ]? --]

::I believe it's <nowiki>{{game-screenshot}}</nowiki>. -- ] 00:00, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

:::Good, good. Should I add it to any particular place in the article? --] 23:27, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

::::The copyright? When you upload the image to Misplaced Pages, you insert the "<nowiki>{{game-screenshot}}</nowiki>" in the upload summary. -- ] 02:36, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

:::::Sorry, I was not clear enough: where should I add the image to the article? --] 21:16, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

::::::Anywhere you want, I'm just supplying the images :) -- ] 21:56, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

:::::History has been made: the image has been added! What else should the article include? --] 02:49, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

::::The new image of Zora Link playing the guitar is preferrable &mdash; much thanks, ]. Are there any other adjustments we should make to the article? I still recommend references; if we do not include any, then the article will be turned down in the blink of an eye at featured article nomination time. &ndash;] 19:42, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

I'm going to submit this article to ] &mdash; although I am positive that it will not succeed in its first attempt, whenever one wants a review of the article that will be useful to enhancing it, that's the place to go. Not ]. Peer review is useless, if you ask me. &mdash;] 13:30, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

:I've upgraded the article substantially, although I still do not feel as though it is prepared for featured article candidates, however, I am not hesitant on submitting it. Any ideas or input? &mdash;] 14:37, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

::A useful peer review has resulted to the request I made at ]. I am rather impressed, since this is rarely the case. The article has improved substantially with the comments made, and I'll be addressing a few more headers and knick-knacks before I submit ''Majora'' to ]. &mdash;] 14:23, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

== ChristianAnswers? ==

I have one question. What on Earth is the following phrase doing in a Legend of Zelda article?

:: David Cady of ChristianAnswers commented, "The game does have a darker feel than the original, though I believe that it has improved in its morals."

Yes, it is all good and well that it has a darker feel than the original but what on Earth does its morales have to do with gameplay? Couldn't a better quote be used?

Let's have his comment put into context shall we?

::The game does have a darker feel than the original, though I believe that it has improved in its morals. There is magic used, but not magic by witches or sorcerers. It is only used to increase your sword attack or a new arrow attack. The violence is at a minimal; there is no blood. You just fight against creatures, like giant spiders, or fish; no human harm is done. This game does teach perseverance, hard work, and compassion.
:: Source:

I think I'll go and replace that quote by David Cady with one that isn't about the Christian persepective on the game.

] 14:08, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

:One source, regardless of what it is, is enough to verify whether a game is darker than its predecessor. If this comment is not included in the article, then objections will be raised come nomination time for featured article. Or do you believe that a better source could be located and featured in the article instead? &mdash;] 21:53, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

If you had looked at my change, you would have seen a source tagged onto it. Frankly, I don't think David Cady's quote is good, because the focus of the article was on its Christian-ness and not the game's darkness. In the meantime, I have in fact found a different one.

"In the first of our second sittings with important titles of recent years, we look at the oddest, darkest and saddest of all Zelda games" - Edge Magazine, December 2004 issue, page 121.

How's about we use that one instead? And frankly, do we really need the quote, as long as we put the reference down as I had done in my change to the article?

] 22:22, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

:It would be preferrable to place the quote in the Notes section; when I nominate the article for featured status, I really don't want people complaining. It must be placed where it belongs, and in this case, the "Notes" is where the quote belongs. A very good quote too, I must admit! &mdash;] 14:44, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

The comment made by the ''ChristianAnswers'' user has been removed. I will not restore it. &mdash;] 01:53, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Speaking as someone who is a Christian, I know that nothing in the game bothered me. This game is very tame compared to some of the other games out there.

==]==
The article has improved substantially&mdash;perhaps even considerably or remarkably&mdash;since the nomination process begun. Please vote at ]. Thank you! &mdash;] 00:47, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

: is a better version of ]. I'm putting this here instead of uploading it myself because the current one seems to be squished in order for it to be almost square-like (so it would look better on the article), and you can do what you want with it, then fix it. -- ] 01:57, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

::Corrected. Thanks! :D &mdash;] 02:49, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

:::Any time! -- ] 02:50, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

''I don't believe erasing and replacing the review with a different word usage is anymore rewarding''

Care to explain? I added "in its review" because it seemed to add more variation to the prose, nothing else. - ] | ]] 22:38, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

:No, I was emphasizing the "erasing", but I suppose I failed; this is the internet after all. Are you going to address your vote at the nomination process? Sorry if I sound pushy. &mdash;] 22:56, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

::No, I intend to do a few more changes first. ] | ]] 22:57, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Two questions:

#What are those changes?
#I've noticed that whenever you sign your posts, your talk page and contributions appear. How is it that one can do this?

&mdash;] 23:02, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

#Essentially, work on the gameplay section. I think the layout can be improved, some details should be removed, and a few bits of information are missing. I'd also like to get some better screenshots.
#Go to preferences, check "raw signature" and set "Nickname" to whatever you like. ] | ]] 23:14, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

:Which screenshots do you believe should be removed? &mdash;] 23:18, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
::Well, the biggest problem is that most screenshots are from cutscenes. I would at least like to replace some of them with equivalents that show some dialogue, but also add more action shots. Also, the aesthetics could be improved (the Goron shot is not particularly pretty) and some of them have visible emulation artifacts. ] | ]] 14:58, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

:The Goron screenshot is supposed to demonstrate the landscape of Termina. Essential images include the Skull Kid, Moon, and Tatl and Tael. &mdash;] . . . (]) 17:39, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

::I agree on all points, but it's possible to get '''better''' images. ] | ]] 22:49, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

== Spoiler tags ==

We don't need the spoiler tags, because nothing is being spoilt. All the information given here is also in the manual, except possibly some details of the intro that we'd probably be better off removing. ] | ]] 22:48, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

:I strongly disagree. If we are going to be narrating the opening scenes of the video game, the spoiler tags are required. Why else would the tags have been created? &mdash;] . . . (]) 23:40, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

::I've replaced the structure of the article in its previous form; the newer edition was not the apple of my eye and turned me away. &mdash;] . . . (]) 23:48, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

:They were created for endings, solutions to puzzles, and plot twists. ] | ]] 23:58, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

== Declining ==

Declining!

I had a reason for all the minor changes, such as moving the mention of "fixed 3D" to the section on technical development since it has nothing to do with gameplay (it is in fact directly related to the extra 4 MB of memory), removing speculation ("presumably the Lost Woods"), removing errors (Majora's Mask has indeed been cited as one of the greatest games of all time) -- and others which you just reverted without comment seemingly because you disagreed about the structure of the article, which isn't a very productive way to edit.

I also feel that my general changes to structure, layout and style improve the article -- eg "Graphical similarity to Ocarina of Time" vs just "characters", when that's what it's about, putting information on time travel in one place and transformations in one other place, instead of repeating the same information three times in different sections. I am not interested in waging a revert war; so for what it's worth, I'll rather let my FAC objection stand than continue with this. ] | ]] 23:57, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

:I have not removed your edits but merely attempted to restructure them. What do you think as it currently stands? &mdash;] . . . (]) 00:03, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

::The inaccuracies I removed have been re-added (and you have introduced a few new ones, for example, claiming that the article ] is about the game's gameplay). ] | ]] 00:08, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

:No, Termina is where the ''game is played''. I find it acceptable enough to add it under this header despite that it is not directly related. &mdash;] . . . (]) 00:25, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

==Featured status==
The article is now a ]! Thank you to everybody who contributed, and I'd like to announce that my next project is to upgrade '']'' to featured status! :) &mdash;] . . . (]) 01:14, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

This article seems very poorly referenced...how did it reach featured article status? A mistake was made by giving this article featured status when it lacks sufficient references/citations in a number of sections. ] 20:39, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

== Resubmitted to FAC ==

It's been done. Hopefully this time it will pass despite previous allegations of fraud. - ] 20:54, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

== Inline citation ==

I just converted the notes section to the new ] format that was created. This format will make things a bit easier to manage when we do inline citations. During the conversion, I discovered that the ref to the following source was broken. I commented it out in the article, but i also brought it here. Does anyone know what this source was used for origianlly in the note section.

Miyamoto, Shigeru. ''N-Sider''. . Retrieved December 11, 2005.

--] ] 06:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

==The Woods==

I'm sure that the woods that Link is in when searching for his friend is in Hyrule because this is before he steps on the portal that
leads to Termina. ] 15:00, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

:True, it's definitely not Termina. However, Link is searching for Navi - it is possible that he wandered past the boundaries of Hyrule in his search. There's no way to know for sure. I'm reverting since this is speculation. Thanks for the copyedit changes, by the way, I've been trying to get help with that. --] 02:02, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

:I reverted a few things that I'm explaining here just to be clear: the ''Foo, then bar.'' construction is legitimate. If you add a conjunction, the comma cannot stay. (''Foo and bar.'' not ''Foo, and bar.'') The other revert is "Story and gameplay details.... show that the opening story ... as well as the use of masks ... '''are''' already in place". ''Story'' and ''use of masks'' take a plural verb here. --] 02:08, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

:I think that Nintendo has claimed that it was a section of the Lost Woods that were never visited in ]
--] 21:58, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Yea, I do beleive that it is the Lost Woods, since there are no other woods mentioned in the entire game. And he was searching for Navi.

==Edits by anonymous contributer==
I edited the article and made a few changes:

*The spoiler tag was in the wrong section; half of the plot was placed outside of the <nowiki>{{spoilers}}</nowiki>.
**This is intentional, and was implemented to address a concern on the FAC submission. The first part of the plot is not really a spoiler, it was even known before the game's release.
*The "References" header was unusually farther down the page than other headers.
*One of the images clashed with the header change.
*Rewrote a poorly-written sentence (the last one) next to the image of the fish playing the guitar.
**Your rewrite replaced "he is much taller than adult Link" with the awkward (and somewhat incorrect) "his size is much taller than that of adult Link's" and introduced a punctuation error. If you feel the sentence is poorly worded, feel free to discuss it here.
] 20:53, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

I'm reverting most of your changes, see my reasons above. --] 22:32, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

:I disagree with placing the spoilers tag in the middle of the section because the first part is still a spoiler: the antagonist of Link is introduced; the Ocarina of Time and Epona are stolen; Link is transformed into a Deku Scrub. I find these to be spoilers, especially the latter two. You are right pointing out that the sentence in the next section if incorrect; I am going to rewrite it once more. I also noticed that you furthered the "References" header down the article again; isn't this incorrect in correspondence to the rest of the article and Misplaced Pages articles as a whole? ] 00:05, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

I placed the spoilers tag at the top of the section in which it appears once again for the reasons noted above. Some other edits include switching the side of the article the image of the moon appears on due to writing contrasts (this will not appear on everybody's computer, but I have made this edit for the sake of people with the same computer as mine); I rewrote the "height" sentence once again, and added some wikilinks which were missing. ] 00:14, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

I'm at a loss. You've now replaced "is much taller than Adult Link" with "is much taller compared to the height of Adult Link", which is the same problem as before - why do you insist on adding unecessary words? What else would one compare in that situation? As for moving references down, it's easy to overlook something minor like that when performing a partial revert; it wasn't intentional. The majority of the changes you are making are undoing the work agreed upon in the FAC submission. I request that you discuss proposed changes here and obtain a consensus before proceeding, as there were no objections to the changes you are undoing at the FAC submission.

Long story short, I suspect you are Hollow Wilerding, evading a block, and have submitted a CheckUser request. --] 02:07, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

:I've submitted my opposition to the FAC of this article. I don't know who Hollow Wilerding is or what a CheckUser request is. ] 02:31, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

::By the way, "compare", from an English Oxford dictionary states:
::*To consider or describe as similar, equal, or analogous; liken.
::*To examine in order to note the similarities or differences of.
::One does not need to compare more than one object in order to make a point. ] 02:35, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

::I know what ''compare'' means, although I think you mean "Oxford English Dictionary". I don't know what the definition has to do with anything. My point is that you're complicating the sentence without gain. Nothing is wrong with the phrase "is taller than". You don't have to say "compared to the height of", that's understood &mdash; taller is a comparison of height. It's like saying "A kilometer is longer than the length of a meter." instead of "A kilometer is longer than a meter". It's just silly. --] 03:55, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
::I rewrote the sentence, hopefully it will be agreeable to us both. --] 04:11, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
:It's better than before, but not perfect. I won't argue though. Could you please place the moon image on the right side of the screen? On my computer, and on other various formats, the writing is literally moving into the image, but if you place it on the right side, no interference occurs. Could you please place it on the right? I still disagree with the spoilers tag, but I'll leave it for now. ] 20:42, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
::I'll leave it, I didn't know it caused a problem for you. Which text is in the picture, and what operating system and browser are you using? --] 00:46, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
:::The last sentence of the Storyline section was running into the image. Windows XP is the operating system that I access, however, I am not aware of the browser as this is a public computer. ] 00:51, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
::::That gives it about a 99% chance of being IE. That should be a common combo, anyone else experiencing a problem like this? --] 01:30, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
:::I centred the reviews in the review template as it emphasizes the writing. I don't mind if one reverts these edits as it was based on personal taste. ] 02:20, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
::I went through the history and found a few wikilinks that had been removed and replaced them in the article. I think I'm finished editing this article, and may register an account on Misplaced Pages next month if I find the time to. Ciao! ] 21:13, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

==Alcohol reference==
Majora's Mask has an alcohol reference. In the milk bar there is a man named Gorman drinking milk at the counter, and he's acting like he's drunk. <small>&mdash;''The preceding ] comment was added by'' ] (]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;]) {{{2|}}}.</small><!--Inserted with Template:Unsigned-->
:That is true, but I am not sure that that is notable enough to warrant a mention in the article. But thank you, anonymous user, for suggesting it. ] | ] 18:48, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
::I daresay Link's rampant ] and habit of murdering all the local wildlife is a worse influence on kids than one drunk guy anyway :) -- <font color="#668353">]</font> <font color="#ff4487">]</font> 23:33, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
:::Yes, yes, I agree. &mdash;] | ] 14:45, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
He may not be drunk, maybe just crazy. That happens sometimes.
:::Hey dude, kleptomania is a serious psychological condition. What would Link's therapist think if she saw this webpage? ] 10:55, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

I say that milkbars got me thinking on the good ol' ultraviolence.. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) {{{2|}}}.</small>

== Image ==

Since there is Zora and Goron Link, and there is a ] in the N64 page... can we put it or the article has images enough? ] ] 18:10, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
:I don't believe we should placed another image in the article as it could disrupt the fair use policy. Also, there are already quite a number of screenshots. &mdash;] | ] 21:29, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

== Giant's mask ==

I think we need some hands-on research or a source for the Giant's Mask issue. It would seem that we're not quite sure whether it's required to defeat Twinmold. My understanding is that you can only do it with either the Giant's Mask ''or'' the Fierce Diety Mask...but having the latter requires the former. Is it possible with the Bow and Arrows? Is it reasonable, given the number of arrows you'd need? Clearly it's intended to be required, so should we just leave it at that? -- <font color="#668353">]</font> <font color="#F8FCFF">]</font> 02:31, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
:"Hands-on research" is ]. Listing the four masks required is barely encyclopedic as it is, I don't want to add much more to the paragraph. '''<font color="8855DD">]</font><font color="#6666AA">]</font>''' 04:17, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
::Ah, but we can use OR to satisfy our own curiosities safely on the talk page - this will keep us from repeatedly tweaking the article. -- <font color="#668353">]</font> <font color="#F8FCFF">]</font> 04:28, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
:::No its not needed. I originally beat the Twinmold without it. Just use bomb mask and stand near one of the snake things and explode against it. Pretty easy. ] 04:17, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
:::Oh and i accidently was anonymous for previous change... ] 04:18, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
::When I was playing ''Majora's Mask'', the use of the Giant's Mask was pretty straight-forward. I have never defeated Twinmold without its assistance (although I have attempted it). &mdash;] | ] 15:33, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
:::I defeated the twin worms with just the bow and arrows, because I ran out of mana required to continue use of the mask. It can be done, and it was much more fun than transforming and slash-smashing the worms into non-existance. {{unsigned|70.95.59.46}}

== Box art ==

Recently ] added multiple box arts to the article , which were re-ordered by ] and then reverted entirely by ] (subsequent diffs from that edit). I think we should have all three box arts somewhere in this article - this is not ] Misplaced Pages, it's for everyone. (I would agree that we need to choose where to place them, and that the box art in Japanese should be de-emphasized because this is not the Japanese Misplaced Pages.) Please note that ] has multiple boxes as well. What do you all think about having all three boxes here? -- <font color="#668353">]</font> <font color="#F8FCFF">]</font> 01:40, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
:It's true that some of the other cover art boxes could be displayed, but where could they be inserted into the article? There are already far too many fair use images, and the inclusion of another may be violating the ]. In addition to that, when an image is tagged for fair use, it has to expand upon the text to make it appear visual; there is currently not section in the article where an art box would live up to the fair use. I also noted in my edit summary that there is limited space remaining as well. &mdash;] | ] 20:08, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
::] suggests that they could perhaps appear in a gallery? I would suggest removing the Tatl and Tael image and putting the gallery down near the critical review section - the reviews represent international opinions. I think what this really boils down to an argument over which guidelines are more important - NPOV vs fair use & article size. -- <font color="#668353">]</font> <font color="#F8FCFF">]</font> 22:26, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
:::I'm not really fond of galleries since it is like they serve the purpose of wasting valuable writing space. Perhaps we could remove the Tatl and Tael image and include the Japanese art box. I don't believe the "special edition" box (or whatever it was) really qualifies as fair use; it is certainly pushing boundaries. &mdash;] | ] 01:13, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
::::It was the PAL version. On the one hand, I think the PAL version would be more useful to this article (it's the English version of the game for non-North-American countries) than the Japanese version simply because it's in English. On the other hand, the PAL box is pretty similar to the US cover art we already have. Displaying the Japanese art as a switch for Tatl and Tael would make a good compromise, I think, although I'm hoping someone else will weigh in with an opinion. I've collected the box arts in a gallery below for comparison - if you want to delete the gallery after consensus is reached feel free. -- <font color="#668353">]</font> <font color="#F8FCFF">]</font> 01:22, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
:::::Are there any other comments? &mdash;] | ] 00:03, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
::::::I too am not a huge fan of galleries, but in this case it may be the best way out of a bad situation. ] | ] 00:13, 14 April 2006
:::::::I'm still rather reluctant to place a gallery template in the article. Perhaps we should insert the Japanese cover art into the article first (which has also been accomplished at ])? If this fails, then... we'll continue to elaborate. &mdash;] | ] 01:37, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

'''Box art images''': ] ] ]

==Sequel==
Isn't this game the sequel to Ocarina of Time terms of story?{{unsigned|Ryu Ematsu|05:15, May 14, 2006}}
:Yes, it is. When writing on talk pages, put new topics at the '''bottom''', and don’t forget to sign your comments by typing four tildes( <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). -- ] (]) 06:37, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

== giant's mask?? ==

I didn't think it was required to beat the stone tower boss

I haven't played in years, but I seem to remember running out of mana and finishing the battle in small form.

--] 17:08, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

== Wow ==

I haven't visited this article in a while and didn't catch it when it was featured, but I'm a huge fan of the game and I'm extremely impressed at the detailed information and terse, well-written prose throughout this article, much of which even I never knew. This is an article that wastes no words and says nothing twice. Among the best I've seen. ] 12:18, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

== Earthquakes and such ==

The added statements about earthquakes on the last day and a timer in the last six hours are true, but I personally don't think they add very much. All sorts of things change as time runs out, like people leaving the streets of Clock Town and of course the moon getting closer. ] 03:08, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
:Agreed. True statement, adds nothing to the article. ] 03:16, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
::Yes of course. Why would something to do with the game be relevant to the game article? --] 18:35, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

==Spoiler tags==
I recently removed a spoiler tag. However, this was quickly put back by the user ], claiming "Plot" doesn't imply spoilers below. Dictionary.com states:

<blockquote>
Also called storyline. the plan, scheme, or main story of a literary or dramatic work, as a play, novel, or short story.
</blockquote>

This clearly shows that plot is going to reveal the main story - meaning Plot DOES imply spoiler below. This enough is evidence for redundancy, but there's also the matter that Misplaced Pages is an '''encyclopedia'''. It is not a game guide. Misplaced Pages is for information. Moreover, all Final Fantasy articles that have been featured (there are 5) do not have spoiler tags. Is there any good reason for the placement of the spoiler tags in an '''encyclopedia'''? Please do not tell me that 'it's nice', because an encyclopedia's task is not to be 'nice', it is to give information. --] 05:46, 1 October 2006 (UTC)



==Stone Tower Temple==
I haven't played this game in years but I do remeber that it is possible to defeat the boss in the Stone Tower temple without actually completing the temple itself. If I remember rightly when the temple is inverted there is a walkway on which you have to defeat some kind of large enemy. Once you have done this to the bottom right of the walkway there is a wooden chest just in range of the hookshot. Link can hookshot to this lower level using this chest and then can then enter a room on this level, defeat the enemy within the room for which he is rewarded the boss key. With this you can now defeat the boss without completing the temple.

As it is so long since I played this game I'm not sure if the above is completely correct, but I do know that I defeated the boss without completing the temple first time I played this game by using the above described sploitz with the hookshot. I think someone should research this as other gliches in the gameplay are mentioned in the article. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) {{{2|}}}.</small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

==Reception==
Shouldn't there be some sort of reference in the reception section to the way in which many Zelda fans considered the game to be far too short (4 temples compared to the Ocarina of Time's 10), easy, and the way in which your items and much of your progress was lost after you save the game? I know that this is a view shared by myself and all my friends who played this game. We can't have been the only ones to have thought this, surely? <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) {{{2|}}}.</small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

:Clarification, the main story was short, and if you ignored all the sidequests, the game would be shorter. But with the sidequests, the game was much longer. In terms of difficulty, I'm pretty sure most agree this game was harder than OOT. The last point was an issue for some, but not for me (I thought it added to the challenge). ] 17:18, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

== Absurd requests for references or sources. ==

Now, I'm not sure of the exact policy for citation requirement, but does this article *really* need to cite references for the setting? The only thing one could cite, after all, would be the game itself, or the manual. Similarly, do we need to cite references for information about the temples? Or the *songs* in the game? All these needless requests for references are cluttering up the article. ] 21:38, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

: The game and manual would, of course, be primary sources and thus ineligible as sources under ]. Secondary sources only, please. ] 21:43, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

:: I don't see how they aren't eligible as valid sources, given that is the scope taken by other articles on popular culture ... I take it there should be a citation for every major thesis proposed in the article, yes, but I see this fulfilled. ] 22:17, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

::: Wrong. Just because other articles are also wrong doesn't make this position any more right. It is, in fact, original research; see ]. ] 22:19, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

::Actually, ] mentions nothing about secondary sources. You may be thinking of ], which in fact states that it is acceptable to use primary sources in articles about themselves. Now, I'll be the first one to criticize an article based ''only'' on primary soures, but that's not the case here. Also, it's usually taken as implicit that, in an article about a single fictional work, the plot is implicitly sourced to the work. More recent FAs have begun to explicitly cite dialogue, to address these concerns, but, as long as the plot section doesn't contain novel interpretations, it's generally deemed acceptable. I don't know of any FA nomination that has failed for merely using the fictional work itself as a source for ''uncontroversial'' plot info (and there have been enough such nominations over time), so consensus seems to be that this does not constitute original research. — ]::] 22:41, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

::: "using the work as a source for uncontroversial plot info has almost never been disputed" (in edit summary) — Really? I've seen it happen time and time again. On what basis was ] deleted, for example, despite being one of the most widespread Internet memes since All Your Base? This is but one example of many, and I've come to understand and appreciate the Misplaced Pages way of ''requiring'' reliable sources. Anything else, I understand, will lead to deletion. ] 22:46, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

::::That's a different matter. The primary source can never establish notability. Reputable, third-party secondary sources do that. That does not preclude using the primary source for what descriptive claims do exist in the article, as long as encyclopedic context is sufficiently established. I did not see the original Limecat article, but the deletion debates make it sound as if the original article failed to provide good sources for web content notability. — ]::] 22:53, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

: Also, please note that " cluttering up the article" is not a valid reason to remove citation-needed tags. ] 21:47, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

:: Oh, I agree with both of your points, but you didn't address my question: does an article about a game need to cite sources for the content contained therein; and if so, where would one cite this information from? ] 22:02, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

::: Every article on Misplaced Pages must cite sources for the content contained therein. Any unverified information ''must'' be removed. If you don't believe me, see ], ], and ]. ] 22:09, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

::: Oh, almost forgot to mention: Enjoy your stay on Misplaced Pages! ] 22:16, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

If this article doesn't cite sources, then it should not be a featured article. ]]]] 21:49, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Elements of gameplay do not need to be cited. The primary source (The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask) covers all of this. --- ] 22:42, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:12, 19 November 2024

Featured articleThe Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Misplaced Pages community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 1, 2006.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 9, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
December 19, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
January 4, 2006Featured article reviewDemoted
January 18, 2006Featured article candidatePromoted
May 4, 2008Featured topic candidatePromoted
July 11, 2008Featured article reviewKept
March 31, 2010Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
August 20, 2010Featured article reviewKept
November 8, 2024Featured article reviewKept
Current status: Featured article
This article is rated FA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconVideo games: Nintendo Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Nintendo task force.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks
AfDs Merge discussions Other discussions No major discussions Featured content candidates Good article nominations DYK nominations Reviews and reassessments
Articles that need...
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Archives
Archive 1

WP:URFA/2020

Many unsourced sentences, paragraphs, and sections. A455bcd9 (talk) 10:06, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Sourcing Issues

This article seems to be lacking sources for some sections, mainly the gameplay and plot. I don't really know what sources would be best for this, while avoiding stuff like fan sites. 22090912l (talk) 14:24, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Agreed, this needs work. This featured article should be reviewed as it has several large sections with missing citations. Fieryninja (talk) 05:40, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Yeah, I'm very new at dealing with stuff like this but it seems to me like it should be reviewed. I've made a start on it and added a couple of sources, but it still needs more work. 22090912l (talk) 15:45, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Marketing budget

User:David Fuchs do you know where to put this? $8 million. Timur9008 (talk) 23:17, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

That would be fodder for a release section. If there's more to build in it, I usually migrate sales to that and put such sections before the critical reception. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs 13:33, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
I've put it before the "Technical differences from Ocarina of Time" section for now. Timur9008 (talk) 14:56, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

"Zelda 6" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Zelda 6 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 14 § Zelda 6 until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 15:02, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

"Four Giants" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Four Giants has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 21 § Four Giants until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 10:48, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

"Latte Milk Bar" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Latte Milk Bar has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 19 § Latte Milk Bar until a consensus is reached. QuicoleJR (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

"Stock Pot Inn" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Stock Pot Inn has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 19 § Stock Pot Inn until a consensus is reached. QuicoleJR (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Categories: