| Revision as of 14:35, 28 July 2017 editNicoScribe (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers15,780 edits →No reason to bypass the redirects: update← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:50, 19 March 2020 edit undoDibbydib (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers5,012 edits Notification: listing of Category:Sesame Street Grouches at categories for discussion. (TW) | ||
| (20 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Blocked == | |||
| Hi, thanks for your edits! Please note that on en.WP, we don't normally years, dates, or common terms. Cheers. ] ] 12:27, 30 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| I have blocked you based on your request here: ]. Since you have not specified the duration, it is currently set to indefinite. If you have any questions, feel free to {{tl|ping}} myself or others. ]] 02:43, 18 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for December 2== | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| <blockquote>Fails ].</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:11, 2 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| == August 2015 == | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 01:07, 27 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ] Please do not add or change content, as you did at ], without citing a ]. Please review the guidelines at ] and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> ] (]) 00:46, 10 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ==] has been nominated for deletion== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''', which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. <span style="color:blue;background-color:#aaa">] <small style="background-color:#ccc">Ping me!</small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></span> 02:50, 19 March 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Redirects == | |||
| May I ask why you keep ignoring ] and ] (the latter of which is a guideline and part of the Manual of Style) in the "]" article? - ] ] 00:55, 17 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :I see that you continue to ignore ], also ]; therefore, ] Welcome to Misplaced Pages, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a ] that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-mos1 --> --] 🌹 (]) 11:41, 19 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::Please stop violating ]. —] (] '''·''' ]) 01:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ] Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a ], and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-mos2 --> —] (] '''·''' ]) 13:20, 22 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for September 9== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] ( | ). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:35, 9 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi,<br> | |||
| You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692239519 --> | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for December 4== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] ( | ). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:37, 4 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == ]: Voting now open! == | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Grouches101. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/41&oldid=750780210 --> | |||
| == No reason to bypass the redirects == | |||
| Hello,<br /> | |||
| I have noticed ''''. This is not compliant with several guidelines, see ] and ]. They explain that redirects should be kept. In your modification, the previous link <nowiki>] was better than ]</nowiki> because it was more precise. Moreover, if <nowiki>]</nowiki> becomes an article about the Emmy ceremonies, the previous link would be OK whereas your new link would have to be corrected.<br /> | |||
| Several people have already mentioned redirects in your talk page. These guidelines reflect ]. Do you intent to go to ] to change the guidelines?<br /> | |||
| Regards --] (]) 21:40, 12 July 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :Hello, have you seen my message? Your first edit after my message was to replace a redirect. --] (]) 09:06, 26 July 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::I thank you for your answer in my talk page, but the discussion began here so it is simpler to continue it here. You wrote "''I still just don't understand what the big deal is; I hate redirects & my edits should b helpful as I'm clearing most of them away to help clean these articles up. Why exactly does it matter so much?''", but: | |||
| ::#Have you read ] and ]? | |||
| ::#Why do you think that "Henson at the 1989 <nowiki>]s" is better than "Henson at the 1989 ]</nowiki>"? | |||
| ::#At least 5 users have already explained to you the benefits of redirects: {{u|JuneGloom07}} in , {{u|AnemoneProjectors}} in , {{u|Redrose64}} in , {{u|Mx. Granger}} in + + , me in and other users have reverted your edits with clear edit summaries. Have you read ]? | |||
| ::--] (]) 17:54, 26 July 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :::I thank you for your answer in my talk page, but the discussion began here so I copy your last text here. You wrote: "''OK, since it's quite clear that my primary concern as far as me editing Misplaced Pages is clearly seen as worthless & unhelpful & a complete waste of time & effort, I am outta here. I will NEVER make another single edit here again. Good day & good luck.''" | |||
| :::--] (]) 14:35, 28 July 2017 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:50, 19 March 2020
Blocked
I have blocked you based on your request here: Special:Diff/796019095. Since you have not specified the duration, it is currently set to indefinite. If you have any questions, feel free to {{ping}} myself or others. Alex Shih 02:43, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Mrs. Grouch
The article Mrs. Grouch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 01:07, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Category:Sesame Street Grouches has been nominated for deletion
Category:Sesame Street Grouches, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. dibbydib Ping me!/✏ 02:50, 19 March 2020 (UTC)