| Revision as of 22:24, 3 October 2006 editEowbotm1 (talk | contribs)55 editsNo edit summary | Latest revision as of 01:37, 20 February 2023 edit undoSheepLinterBot (talk | contribs)Bots50,297 editsm fix font tags linter errorsTag: AWB | ||
| (20 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Ok...if anyone has anything to say, please be concise, to the point, and avoid ] attacks |
Ok...if anyone has anything to say, please be concise, to the point, and avoid ] attacks, or other ]. Thanks.] 22:24, 3 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==Gibberish== | |||
| Just letting you know that I caught you adding nonsense in of ]. If you want to avoid having this account permanently blocked as well, I suggest you refrain from further acts of vandalism. Thankyou. --] 18:40, 11 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Unblock== | |||
| {| align="center" class="notice noprint" style="background: none; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em auto;" | |||
| |- | |||
| | valign="top" style="padding: 0.1em" | ] | |||
| | style="padding: 0.1em" | | |||
| '''Your request to be unblocked''' has been '''granted''' for the following reasons: | |||
| <br><br>] of ] lifted. Sorry for the trouble. | |||
| ''Request handled by:'' ] 01:03, 12 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Request accepted (after-block request) --> | |||
| |} | |||
| ==Removing warnings from your own talk page== | |||
| It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|]|an article}}. Please be careful not to remove content from Misplaced Pages without a valid reason, which you should specify in the ] or on the article's ]. Take a look at our ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. <!-- Template:Test1a (First level warning) --> --] 20:59, 1 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Removing warnings from other talk pages== | |||
| Please do not target one or more user's pages or talk pages for abuse or insults, unwarranted doctoring or blanking{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, as you did with ]}}. It can be seen as ] and may get you ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:Tpv2 --> --] 20:59, 1 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Blocked== | |||
| You have been blocked as a reincarnation of indefinitely blocked user <span class="plainlinks">] (] • ] • ] • ] • ])</span>. If you wish to appeal this block please do so from your main account. ''']''' <small>(])</small> 13:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|What the hell? reincarnation of eowbotm? that username was taken when I got here. What exactly have I done to merit a block? And this ''is'' my main account. I haven't ever really vandalized. Please explain.|decline=You haven't "really" vandalized? It's apparent that you're only here to be disruptive. Not only do you share a username prefix, but the same editing patterns. ] is enough justification for the blocking of all your accounts on sight. -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">] ]</span></small> 02:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)}} | |||
| What do you mean, same editing patterns? I looked at eowbotm, and he seems to have been blocked after like 6 pure vandalism. I have only made legit edits (the "really" was because a few of them were biased). And, again, I am not affiliated with him in any way. Perhaps you could look at more "evidence" than a site which says "people may want to review eowbotm1, but the others..." I don't understand why I have been blocked for the actions of someone else who so happens to have a similar username as mine. I don't know where he got it from, but its the name I've used in several of my online usernames: a joke from an online comic I like to read. Perhaps he got it from the same thing. In conclusion, don't punish me for the actions of another.] 02:28, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :You were previously for sharing the same IP address as ] (] <small>•</small> ]). Considering that both this account and you have tried to vandalise ] by inappropriately inserting "gibberish" and you are definitely up to no good. So good bye. -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">]]</span></small> 06:18, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:37, 20 February 2023
Ok...if anyone has anything to say, please be concise, to the point, and avoid ad hominem attacks, or other logical fallacies. Thanks.Eowbotm1 22:24, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Gibberish
Just letting you know that I caught you adding nonsense in this edit of English language. If you want to avoid having this account permanently blocked as well, I suggest you refrain from further acts of vandalism. Thankyou. --Imroy 18:40, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Unblock
|
Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reasons:
Request handled by: Luna Santin 01:03, 12 October 2006 (UTC) |
Removing warnings from your own talk page
It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from an article. Please be careful not to remove content from Misplaced Pages without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --ArmadilloFromHellGateBridge 20:59, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Removing warnings from other talk pages
Please do not target one or more user's pages or talk pages for abuse or insults, unwarranted doctoring or blanking. It can be seen as vandalism and may get you blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. --ArmadilloFromHellGateBridge 20:59, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Blocked
You have been blocked as a reincarnation of indefinitely blocked user Eowbotm (talk • contribs • • block user • ). If you wish to appeal this block please do so from your main account. Guy (Help!) 13:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Eowbotm1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
What the hell? reincarnation of eowbotm? that username was taken when I got here. What exactly have I done to merit a block? And this is my main account. I haven't ever really vandalized. Please explain.
Decline reason:
You haven't "really" vandalized? It's apparent that you're only here to be disruptive. Not only do you share a username prefix, but the same editing patterns. This is enough justification for the blocking of all your accounts on sight. -- Netsnipe ► 02:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
What do you mean, same editing patterns? I looked at eowbotm, and he seems to have been blocked after like 6 pure vandalism. I have only made legit edits (the "really" was because a few of them were biased). And, again, I am not affiliated with him in any way. Perhaps you could look at more "evidence" than a site which says "people may want to review eowbotm1, but the others..." I don't understand why I have been blocked for the actions of someone else who so happens to have a similar username as mine. I don't know where he got it from, but its the name I've used in several of my online usernames: a joke from an online comic I like to read. Perhaps he got it from the same thing. In conclusion, don't punish me for the actions of another.Eowbotm1 02:28, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- You were previously autoblocked for sharing the same IP address as Freemoneyplz (talk • contribs). Considering that both this account and you have tried to vandalise English language by inappropriately inserting "gibberish" here and here you are definitely up to no good. So good bye. -- Netsnipe ► 06:18, 5 December 2006 (UTC)