| Revision as of 08:16, 5 October 2006 editPolarscribe (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,997 edits →[]← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 19:44, 6 September 2022 edit undoHouseBlaster (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators58,591 editsm Fix linter errors (via WP:JWB) |
| (129 intermediate revisions by 38 users not shown) |
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
|
{| width = "100%" |
|
{| width = "100%" |
|
|- |
|
|- |
|
! width="50%" align="left" | <font color="gray"><</font> ] |
|
! width="50%" align="left" | <span style="color:gray;"><</span> ] |
|
! width="50%" align="right" | ] <font color="gray">></font> |
|
! width="50%" align="right" | ] <span style="color:gray;">></span> |
|
|} |
|
|} |
|
</div> |
|
</div> |
| Line 14: |
Line 14: |
|
Please notify the administrator who performed the action that you wish to be reviewed by leaving {{subst:DRVNote|page name}} on their talk page. |
|
Please notify the administrator who performed the action that you wish to be reviewed by leaving {{subst:DRVNote|page name}} on their talk page. |
|
--> |
|
--> |
|
====]==== |
|
|
] was by Jimbo Wales with the edit summery of "rm corporate spam." This content was created by a commercial source and released under ]. But it was placed in good faith within the rules of wikipedia by an unconnected third party (myself). The content was legitimate and the article was neutral. I haven't been able to identify what, if any, policy the article violated... so I request the article be undeleted and a proper AFD could be preformed to gain community consensus. ---] (]|]) 05:21, 5 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
*'''Put frankly, I have no idea'''. It is generally accepted that you don't over-rule Jimmy when it comes to admin actions - many arbcom cases (the userbox wheel war comes to mind) have resulted in admins losing their administrative powers because they reverted Jimmy in a ]. I honestly don't think DRV is going to get anywhere on this topic. The only way this will serve a purpose is if {{user2|Jimbo Wales}} reads it, and decides to act upon arguments (if they are presented) to restore. Having never seen the article, and not knowing terribly much about Jimmy's action in this case (I've read the talk page of ], that's about all), I have no idea. <font face="sans-serif">''']]]'''</font> 07:13, 5 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*Per Daniel Bryant, this DRV is moot because overturning a Jimbo action is verboten. Take it up with him. ] 08:16, 5 October 2006 (UTC) |
|