Noncommutative quantum field theory: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 16:30, 10 September 2017 editJCW-CleanerBot (talk \| contribs)Bots129,443 editsm →top: task, replaced: Phys. Rev. Letters → Physical Review Letters using AWB ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 07:27, 25 July 2024 edit undo193.205.210.74 (talk) →Further reading Tag: Visual edit
(14 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{technical\|date=May 2023}}

			{{Short description\|Quantum field theory using noncommutative mathematics}}
	{{redirect\|Noncommutative field\|mathematical objects known as "non-commutative fields"\|Division ring}}		{{redirect\|Noncommutative field\|mathematical objects known as "non-commutative fields"\|Division ring}}
	In ], '''noncommutative quantum field theory''' (or quantum field theory on noncommutative spacetime) is an application of noncommutative mathematics to the ] of ] that is an outgrowth of ] and ] in which the coordinate functions <ref>It is possible to have a noncommuting time coordinate as in the paper by Doplicher, Fredenhagen and Roberts mentioned below, but this causes many problems such as the violation of ] of the ]. Hence most research is restricted to so-called "space-space" noncommutativity. There have been attempts to avoid these problems by redefining the ]. However, ] derivations of noncommutative coordinates excludes time-space noncommutativity.</ref> are ]. One commonly studied version of such theories has the "canonical" commutation relation:		In ], '''noncommutative quantum field theory''' (or quantum field theory on noncommutative spacetime) is an application of noncommutative mathematics to the ] of ] that is an outgrowth of ] and ] in which the coordinate functions<ref>It is possible to have a noncommuting time coordinate as in the paper by Doplicher, Fredenhagen and Roberts mentioned below, but this causes many problems such as the violation of ] of the ]. Hence most research is restricted to so-called "space-space" noncommutativity. There have been attempts to avoid these problems by redefining the ]. However, ] derivations of noncommutative coordinates excludes time-space noncommutativity.</ref> are ]. One commonly studied version of such theories has the "canonical" commutation relation:
	<!--		<!--
	The \,\! is to keep the formula rendered as PNG instead of HTML to		The \,\! is to keep the formula rendered as PNG instead of HTML to
Line 8:		Line 11:
	=i \theta^{\mu \nu} \,\!		=i \theta^{\mu \nu} \,\!
	</math>		</math>
	~~which~~ means that (with any given set of axes), it is impossible to accurately measure the position of a particle with respect to more than one axis. In fact, this leads to an uncertainty relation for the coordinates analogous to the ].		where <math>x^{\mu}</math> and <math>x^{\nu}</math> are the hermitian generators of a noncommutative <math>C^*</math>-algebra of "functions on spacetime". That means that (with any given set of axes), it is impossible to accurately measure the position of a particle with respect to more than one axis. In fact, this leads to an uncertainty relation for the coordinates analogous to the ].

	Various lower limits have been claimed for the noncommutative scale, (i.e. how accurately positions can be measured) but there is currently no experimental evidence in favour of such a theory or grounds for ruling them out.		Various lower limits have been claimed for the noncommutative scale, (i.e. how accurately positions can be measured) but there is currently no experimental evidence in favour of such a theory or grounds for ruling them out.

	One of the novel features of noncommutative field theories is the ]<ref>See, for example,		One of the novel features of noncommutative field theories is the ]<ref>See, for example,
	Shiraz Minwalla, Mark Van Raamsdonk, Nathan Seiberg (2000) "" ''Journal of High Energy Physics'', and Alec Matusis, ], Nicolaos Toumbas (2000) "" ''Journal of High Energy Physics''.</ref> phenomenon in which the physics at high energies affects the physics at low energies which does not occur in quantum field theories in which the coordinates commute.		Shiraz Minwalla, Mark Van Raamsdonk, Nathan Seiberg (2000) "," ''Journal of High Energy Physics'', and Alec Matusis, ], Nicolaos Toumbas (2000) "," ''Journal of High Energy Physics''.</ref> phenomenon in which the physics at high energies affects the physics at low energies which does not occur in quantum field theories in which the coordinates commute.

	Other features include violation of ] due to the preferred direction of noncommutativity. ] can however be retained in the sense of twisted ] of the theory.<ref>M. Chaichian, P. Prešnajder, A. Tureanu (2005)		Other features include violation of ] due to the preferred direction of noncommutativity. ] can however be retained in the sense of twisted ] of the theory.<ref>M. Chaichian, P. Prešnajder, A. Tureanu (2005)
	"" ''Physical Review Letters'' 94: .</ref> The ] is modified from that of the commutative theories.		"," ''Physical Review Letters'' 94: .</ref> The ] is modified from that of the commutative theories.

	==History and motivation==		==History and motivation==
Line 22:		Line 25:
	] was the first to suggest extending noncommutativity to the coordinates as a possible way of removing the infinite quantities appearing in field theories before the ] procedure was developed and had gained acceptance. The first paper on the subject was published in 1947 by ]. The success of the renormalization method resulted in little attention being paid to the subject for some time. In the 1980s, mathematicians, most notably ], developed ]. Among other things, this work generalized the notion of ] to a noncommutative setting. This led to an ]ic description of noncommutative ]s, with the problem that it classically corresponds to a manifold with positively defined ], so that there is no description of (noncommutative) causality in this approach. However it also led to the development of a ] on a noncommutative ].		] was the first to suggest extending noncommutativity to the coordinates as a possible way of removing the infinite quantities appearing in field theories before the ] procedure was developed and had gained acceptance. The first paper on the subject was published in 1947 by ]. The success of the renormalization method resulted in little attention being paid to the subject for some time. In the 1980s, mathematicians, most notably ], developed ]. Among other things, this work generalized the notion of ] to a noncommutative setting. This led to an ]ic description of noncommutative ]s, with the problem that it classically corresponds to a manifold with positively defined ], so that there is no description of (noncommutative) causality in this approach. However it also led to the development of a ] on a noncommutative ].

	The particle physics community became interested in the noncommutative approach because of a paper by ] and ].<ref>Seiberg, N. and E. Witten (1999) "" ''Journal of High Energy Physics'' .</ref> They argued in the context of ] that the coordinate functions of the endpoints of open strings constrained to a ] in the presence of a constant ~~Neveu-Schwarz~~ B-field—equivalent to a constant ] on the brane—would satisfy the noncommutative algebra set out above. The implication is that a quantum field theory on noncommutative spacetime can be interpreted as a low energy limit of the theory of open strings.		The particle physics community became interested in the noncommutative approach because of a paper by ] and ].<ref>Seiberg, N. and E. Witten (1999) "," ''Journal of High Energy Physics'' .</ref> They argued in the context of ] that the coordinate functions of the endpoints of open strings constrained to a ] in the presence of a constant Neveu–Schwarz B-field—equivalent to a constant ] on the brane—would satisfy the noncommutative algebra set out above. The implication is that a quantum field theory on noncommutative spacetime can be interpreted as a low energy limit of the theory of open strings.

	Two papers, one by Sergio Doplicher, Klaus Fredenhagen and John Roberts<ref>Sergio Doplicher, Klaus Fredenhagen, John E. Roberts (1995) "" ''Commun. Math. Phys''. 172: 187-220.</ref>		Two papers, one by ], ] and John Roberts<ref>Sergio Doplicher, Klaus Fredenhagen, John E. Roberts (1995) "," ''Commun. Math. Phys''. 172: 187-220.</ref>
	and the other by D. V. Ahluwalia,<ref>D. V. Ahluwalia (1993) "" ``Phys. Lett. B339:301-303,1994. A look at preprint dates shows that this work takes priority over Doplicher et al. publication by eight months</ref>		and the other by D. V. Ahluwalia,<ref>D. V. Ahluwalia (1993) "," ``Phys. Lett. B339:301-303,1994. A look at preprint dates shows that this work takes priority over Doplicher et al. publication by eight months</ref>
	set out another motivation for the possible noncommutativity of space-time.		set out another motivation for the possible noncommutativity of space-time.
	The arguments go as follows: According to ], when the energy density grows sufficiently large, a ] is formed. On the other hand, according to the Heisenberg ], a measurement of a space-time separation causes an uncertainty in momentum inversely proportional to the extent of the separation. Thus energy whose scale corresponds to the uncertainty in momentum is localized in the system within a region corresponding to the uncertainty in position. When the separation is small enough, the ] of the system is reached and a ] is formed, which prevents any information from escaping the system. Thus there is a lower bound for the measurement of length. A sufficient condition for preventing gravitational collapse can be expressed as an uncertainty relation for the coordinates. This relation can in turn be derived from a ] relation for the coordinates.		The arguments go as follows: According to ], when the energy density grows sufficiently large, a ] is formed. On the other hand, according to the Heisenberg ], a measurement of a space-time separation causes an uncertainty in momentum inversely proportional to the extent of the separation. Thus energy whose scale corresponds to the uncertainty in momentum is localized in the system within a region corresponding to the uncertainty in position. When the separation is small enough, the ] of the system is reached and a ] is formed, which prevents any information from escaping the system. Thus there is a lower bound for the measurement of length. A sufficient condition for preventing gravitational collapse can be expressed as an uncertainty relation for the coordinates. This relation can in turn be derived from a ] relation for the coordinates.

	It is worth stressing that, differently from other approaches, in particular those relying upon Connes' ideas, here the noncommutative spacetime is a proper spacetime, i.e. it extends the idea of a four-dimensional ]. On the other hand, differently from Connes' noncommutative geometry, the proposed model turns out to be ~~coordinates~~ dependent from scratch.		It is worth stressing that, differently from other approaches, in particular those relying upon Connes' ideas, here the noncommutative spacetime is a proper spacetime, i.e. it extends the idea of a four-dimensional ]. On the other hand, differently from Connes' noncommutative geometry, the proposed model turns out to be coordinate-dependent from scratch.
	In Doplicher Fredenhagen Roberts' paper noncommutativity of coordinates concerns all four spacetime coordinates and not only spatial ones.		In Doplicher Fredenhagen Roberts' paper noncommutativity of coordinates concerns all four spacetime coordinates and not only spatial ones.

Line 42:		Line 45:

	==Further reading==		==Further reading==
	*{{cite book \| last=Grensing \| first=Gerhard \| year=2013 \| title=Structural Aspects of Quantum Field Theory and Noncommutative Geometry \| publisher=World Scientific \| isbn=978-981-4472-69-2 ~~\| url = http://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/8771~~}}		*{{cite book \| last=Grensing \| first=Gerhard \| year=2013 \| title=Structural Aspects of Quantum Field Theory and Noncommutative Geometry \| publisher=World Scientific \| doi=10.1142/8771 \| isbn=978-981-4472-69-2 }}
	* M.R. Douglas and N. A. Nekrasov (2001) "" ] 73: ~~977–1029~~.		* M. R. Douglas and N. A. Nekrasov, (2001). ''''. Rev. Mod. Phys., 73(4), 977.
	* ~~Szabo,~~ R. (2003) "" ''Physics Reports'' 378: 207-99. An expository article on noncommutative quantum field theories.		* Richard J. Szabo (2003) "," ''Physics Reports'' 378: 207-99. An expository article on noncommutative quantum field theories.
	* on arxiv.org		* on arxiv.org
	* V. Moretti (2003), "" Rev. Math. Phys. 15: 1171-1218. An expository paper (also) on the difficulties to extend non-commutative geometry to the Lorentzian case describing causality		* Valter Moretti (2003), "," Rev. Math. Phys. 15: 1171-1218. An expository paper (also) on the difficulties to extend non-commutative geometry to the Lorentzian case describing causality
	{{Quantum field theories}}		{{Quantum field theories}}

Latest revision as of 07:27, 25 July 2024

This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. Please help improve it to make it understandable to non-experts, without removing the technical details. (May 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Quantum field theory using noncommutative mathematics "Noncommutative field" redirects here. For mathematical objects known as "non-commutative fields", see Division ring.

In mathematical physics, noncommutative quantum field theory (or quantum field theory on noncommutative spacetime) is an application of noncommutative mathematics to the spacetime of quantum field theory that is an outgrowth of noncommutative geometry and index theory in which the coordinate functions are noncommutative. One commonly studied version of such theories has the "canonical" commutation relation:

=i\theta ^{\mu \nu }\,\!

where $x^{\mu }$ and $x^{\nu }$ are the hermitian generators of a noncommutative $C^{*}$ -algebra of "functions on spacetime". That means that (with any given set of axes), it is impossible to accurately measure the position of a particle with respect to more than one axis. In fact, this leads to an uncertainty relation for the coordinates analogous to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.

Various lower limits have been claimed for the noncommutative scale, (i.e. how accurately positions can be measured) but there is currently no experimental evidence in favour of such a theory or grounds for ruling them out.

One of the novel features of noncommutative field theories is the UV/IR mixing phenomenon in which the physics at high energies affects the physics at low energies which does not occur in quantum field theories in which the coordinates commute.

Other features include violation of Lorentz invariance due to the preferred direction of noncommutativity. Relativistic invariance can however be retained in the sense of twisted Poincaré invariance of the theory. The causality condition is modified from that of the commutative theories.

History and motivation

Heisenberg was the first to suggest extending noncommutativity to the coordinates as a possible way of removing the infinite quantities appearing in field theories before the renormalization procedure was developed and had gained acceptance. The first paper on the subject was published in 1947 by Hartland Snyder. The success of the renormalization method resulted in little attention being paid to the subject for some time. In the 1980s, mathematicians, most notably Alain Connes, developed noncommutative geometry. Among other things, this work generalized the notion of differential structure to a noncommutative setting. This led to an operator algebraic description of noncommutative space-times, with the problem that it classically corresponds to a manifold with positively defined metric tensor, so that there is no description of (noncommutative) causality in this approach. However it also led to the development of a Yang–Mills theory on a noncommutative torus.

The particle physics community became interested in the noncommutative approach because of a paper by Nathan Seiberg and Edward Witten. They argued in the context of string theory that the coordinate functions of the endpoints of open strings constrained to a D-brane in the presence of a constant Neveu–Schwarz B-field—equivalent to a constant magnetic field on the brane—would satisfy the noncommutative algebra set out above. The implication is that a quantum field theory on noncommutative spacetime can be interpreted as a low energy limit of the theory of open strings.

Two papers, one by Sergio Doplicher, Klaus Fredenhagen and John Roberts and the other by D. V. Ahluwalia, set out another motivation for the possible noncommutativity of space-time. The arguments go as follows: According to general relativity, when the energy density grows sufficiently large, a black hole is formed. On the other hand, according to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, a measurement of a space-time separation causes an uncertainty in momentum inversely proportional to the extent of the separation. Thus energy whose scale corresponds to the uncertainty in momentum is localized in the system within a region corresponding to the uncertainty in position. When the separation is small enough, the Schwarzschild radius of the system is reached and a black hole is formed, which prevents any information from escaping the system. Thus there is a lower bound for the measurement of length. A sufficient condition for preventing gravitational collapse can be expressed as an uncertainty relation for the coordinates. This relation can in turn be derived from a commutation relation for the coordinates.

It is worth stressing that, differently from other approaches, in particular those relying upon Connes' ideas, here the noncommutative spacetime is a proper spacetime, i.e. it extends the idea of a four-dimensional pseudo-Riemannian manifold. On the other hand, differently from Connes' noncommutative geometry, the proposed model turns out to be coordinate-dependent from scratch. In Doplicher Fredenhagen Roberts' paper noncommutativity of coordinates concerns all four spacetime coordinates and not only spatial ones.

Footnotes

It is possible to have a noncommuting time coordinate as in the paper by Doplicher, Fredenhagen and Roberts mentioned below, but this causes many problems such as the violation of unitarity of the S-matrix. Hence most research is restricted to so-called "space-space" noncommutativity. There have been attempts to avoid these problems by redefining the perturbation theory. However, string theory derivations of noncommutative coordinates excludes time-space noncommutativity.
See, for example, Shiraz Minwalla, Mark Van Raamsdonk, Nathan Seiberg (2000) "Noncommutative Perturbative Dynamics," Journal of High Energy Physics, and Alec Matusis, Leonard Susskind, Nicolaos Toumbas (2000) "The IR/UV Connection in the Non-Commutative Gauge Theories," Journal of High Energy Physics.
M. Chaichian, P. Prešnajder, A. Tureanu (2005) "New concept of relativistic invariance in NC space-time: twisted Poincaré symmetry and its implications," Physical Review Letters 94: .
Seiberg, N. and E. Witten (1999) "String Theory and Noncommutative Geometry," Journal of High Energy Physics .
Sergio Doplicher, Klaus Fredenhagen, John E. Roberts (1995) "The quantum structure of spacetime at the Planck scale and quantum fields," Commun. Math. Phys. 172: 187-220.
D. V. Ahluwalia (1993) "Quantum Measurement, Gravitation, and Locality," ``Phys. Lett. B339:301-303,1994. A look at preprint dates shows that this work takes priority over Doplicher et al. publication by eight months

Misplaced Pages