Misplaced Pages

:Peer review/Uncaria tomentosa/archive1: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Peer review | Uncaria tomentosa Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:04, 7 October 2006 editWLU (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers52,243 edits reply to mystar← Previous edit Latest revision as of 22:05, 19 February 2008 edit undoMelonBot (talk | contribs)56,411 editsm moved Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Uncaria tomentosa to Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Uncaria tomentosa/archive1: Standardising Peer review archive formatting 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
I seek input to the content to help me be a better editor.--] 04:15, 7 October 2006 (UTC) I seek input to the content to help me be a better editor.--] 04:15, 7 October 2006 (UTC)


⚫ The Cat's Claw is classified as a liana, a woody vine. Mystar added plagiarised information which I removed and replaced with a more generalized geographic category, which I justified in the talk page. He does not seem to have done any research. He reverted edits in which I had added a scientific, peer-reviewed article, specifically a review article. ] 13:04, 7 October 2006 (UTC)


:From the instructions above, "Requests for expansion or Cleanup, and content or neutrality disputes should be listed at Requests for comment." ] 00:08, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
⚫ The Cat's Claw is classified as a liana, a woody vine. Mystar added plagiarised information which I removed and replaced with a more generalized geographic category, which I justified in the talk page. He does not seem to have done any research. He reverted edits in which I had added a scientific, peer-reviewed article, specifically a review article. If Mystar is so well-versed in other healing plants, I am curious to see other edits made by him regards these plants, that don't involve single sentences copied and pasted from single websites.
*Please see ] peer review suggestions ]. Thanks, ] 20:55, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

] 13:04, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:05, 19 February 2008

Uncaria tomentosa

I'm trying to follow proper protocols and procedure. I would like some additional outside input. I feel the edits were of good quality and well made, as well as factually and accurately stated. I eliminated information of no relevance "Iliana", and added content that speak to the encyclopedic nature of the plant as well as that of Misplaced Pages policy. I know a great deal abou tthis plant as I haev taken it for a long time and done a grate deal of reasearch on it and other simalar plants with healing powers.

Understand I'm still very new at this and have been in an edit war with this user. I wish to separate any conflict and improve my editing skills and knowledge. A user did weigh in with his thoughts, but as WLU seems to own each and every pages she edits it made no difference at all.

I seek input to the content to help me be a better editor.--Mystar 04:15, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

The Cat's Claw is classified as a liana, a woody vine. Mystar added plagiarised information which I removed and replaced with a more generalized geographic category, which I justified in the talk page. He does not seem to have done any research. He reverted edits in which I had added a scientific, peer-reviewed article, specifically a review article. WLU 13:04, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

From the instructions above, "Requests for expansion or Cleanup, and content or neutrality disputes should be listed at Requests for comment." Sandy 00:08, 8 October 2006 (UTC)