Misplaced Pages

User talk:Psychonot: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:04, 26 September 2017 editEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,210 edits September 2017: Don't remove reports from AIV← Previous edit Latest revision as of 14:48, 29 June 2018 edit undoBonadea (talk | contribs)Edit filter helpers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers150,939 edits Notification: listing at articles for deletion of Dennis Di Lorenzo. (TW
(22 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
] ]


== September 2017 ==
] Please stop ].
* If you are engaged in an article ] with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek ] with them. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's ] page, and ask for independent help at one of the ].
* If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's ].
If you continue to disrupt Misplaced Pages, you may be ]. ''Cross-article disruption. -''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive3 --> ] (]) 19:29, 6 September 2017 (UTC)


== Stop removing sourced material ==
Hi there,


Please stop from the articles. --] <sup>]</sup> 14:00, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
{{ping|LouisAragon}} I don't have any content dispute with anyone. If you have any problem with any of my edit, revert them. I really don't care. I edit sometime just for timepass. I created some articles like ] and ]. Some editors wanted to delete them, I let them do it, but they were not deleted . I don't have any content dispute, or any dispute with anyone. Thanks and best regards,--] (]) 16:22, 7 September 2017 (UTC)


:Check the diff as well as my futher edits, I did not remove anything. Also further talk with you will be on ].--] (]) 18:27, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
::You need to check the diff once again. You had removed "] argues that ..." which was "nicely" sourced. --] <sup>]</sup> 19:30, 27 September 2017 (UTC)


:::I believe I already responded to this on --] (]) 19:36, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
=== Template:Nuclear power in Iran ===
I have reverted your edit to ] where you added Khamenei's name to the section 'Iranian nuclear negotiators'. Khamenei is not a 'nuclear negotiator' involved in negotiations, unless you can provide some ] stating such. ] (]) 19:55, 6 September 2017 (UTC)


== 1RR violation ==
{{ping|DA1}} Iranian Supreme Leader Khamenei issued a letter of guidelines to President Rouhani, on how to proceed with the deal. The new conditions set by him nullifed the original agreement I thought that makes him involved as a negotiator.


As you know, ] is under ] and it says that "If an edit is reverted by another editor, its original author may not restore it within 24 hours." In violation to this ruling, you (the original author) my reverts and might be blocked after being reported. However, I can understand that you could've missed this sanction being applied to the article. So, are you going to revert your self and remove the materials as I did and , or do you want me to report your violation so that admins address your case? I think, we can settle it down without making any reports. --] <sup>]</sup> 19:37, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
: That does not make him a negotiator, just as a lecture or command is not a debate. You need to be involved 'in' formal negotiations to be a nuclear negotiator, which he is not. ] (]) 02:27, 12 September 2017 (UTC)


::Hi there, thanks for following up on this!--] (]) 18:52, 12 September 2017 (UTC) I reverted only one edit and editor, not mine and not within 24 hours. However, you have engaged in persistent edit war with multiple editors at that article.--] (]) 19:39, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
:It's the last time I'm elaborating on this. Yes, you did 1. However, the applied sanction restricts restoring the materials written by you, even with just one revert. By the way, please show diff proving that I "have engaged in persistent edit war with multiple editors at that article." --] <sup>]</sup> 19:44, 27 September 2017 (UTC)


::The material in question was added several days ago, obviously not with 24 hrs. Regarding your editwars, it's in the article's edit history. There's nothing to argue about that.--] (]) 19:47, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
== Stop removing sourced material ==
:::Your reverted me (and restored your material), less than 24 hrs after I had done the edit. So, let's see what the admins say. Regards. --] <sup>]</sup> 19:50, 27 September 2017 (UTC)


::::Wow! the material was actually in the article already from at least 2016 (under fatwa), you removed it first.
Please stop from the articles. --] <sup>]</sup> 14:00, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
*I have reported you ]. --] <sup>]</sup> 20:46, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

== Please don't make personal attacks ==

Hey, besides the points I noted above, please note that you have committed ] by calling me "" and me and ] of canvassing and having "a recent history of tag-teaming as pro-Iran regime." Also, you already another accusation. Please, avoid repeating such comments; Act per ] and {{tq|"Comment on content, not on the contributor."}} The guideline adds that "Repeated or egregious personal attacks may lead to sanctions including blocks." Regards. --] <sup>]</sup> 20:03, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

== SPI notice ==

] You are suspected of ], which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Misplaced Pages accounts for prohibited purposes. Please familiarize yourself with the ], then respond to the evidence at ].] (]) 21:15, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

== Ways to improve Mercy College School of Business ==

Hi, I'm AngusWOOF. Psychonot, thanks for creating ]!

I've just tagged the page, using our ] tools, as having some issues to fix. Needs notability and significant coverage independent of Mercy College. Article as is has numerous references pointing to the website, press releases, non-notable "Patch" articles, and then directory listings

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on ]. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at ].

] (] • ]) 19:44, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

== Ways to improve Mercy College School of Business ==

Hi, I'm AngusWOOF. Psychonot, thanks for creating ]!

I've just tagged the page, using our ] tools, as having some issues to fix. Needs more information on its history, program reception (ranking among business schools), related organizations and businesses

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on ]. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at ].

] (] • ]) 19:48, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

== Speedy deletion nomination of John Thompson (businessman) ==

Hello Psychonot,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged ] for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created ]. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can <span class="plainlinks">''''''</span>, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on ] if you have questions.


<sup>]]]</sup> 00:23, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
== September 2017 ==
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ].


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> '']'' <small>] ]</small> 14:48, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->] (]) 21:39, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
:His involvement now has a source. Next time don't waste people's time removing information which is known to be true because it has a lacking citation, find a better one.] (]) 21:43, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
::Psychonot, please don't remove reports by others from ]. If the report isn't valid it will be declined anyway. ] (]) 22:04, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:48, 29 June 2018

Battle of Hawijah


Stop removing sourced material

Please stop removing sourced materials from the articles. --Mhhossein 14:00, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Check the diff as well as my futher edits, I did not remove anything. Also further talk with you will be on Talk:Ali Khamenei.--Psychonot (talk) 18:27, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
You need to check the diff once again. You had removed "Gareth Porter argues that ..." which was "nicely" sourced. --Mhhossein 19:30, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
I believe I already responded to this on Talk:Ali_Khamenei#Porter.27s_opinion--Psychonot (talk) 19:36, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

1RR violation

As you know, the article is under WP:ARBPIA and it says that "If an edit is reverted by another editor, its original author may not restore it within 24 hours." In violation to this ruling, you (the original author) reverted my reverts and might be blocked after being reported. However, I can understand that you could've missed this sanction being applied to the article. So, are you going to revert your self and remove the materials as I did here and here, or do you want me to report your violation so that admins address your case? I think, we can settle it down without making any reports. --Mhhossein 19:37, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

I reverted only one edit and editor, not mine and not within 24 hours. However, you have engaged in persistent edit war with multiple editors at that article.--Psychonot (talk) 19:39, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

It's the last time I'm elaborating on this. Yes, you did 1. However, the applied sanction restricts restoring the materials written by you, even with just one revert. By the way, please show diff proving that I "have engaged in persistent edit war with multiple editors at that article." --Mhhossein 19:44, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
The material in question was added several days ago, obviously not with 24 hrs. Regarding your editwars, it's in the article's edit history. There's nothing to argue about that.--Psychonot (talk) 19:47, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Your reverted me (and restored your material), less than 24 hrs after I had done the edit. So, let's see what the admins say. Regards. --Mhhossein 19:50, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Wow! the material was actually in the article already from at least 2016 (under fatwa), you removed it first.

Please don't make personal attacks

Hey, besides the points I noted above, please note that you have committed personal attack by calling me "persistent editwarrior with agenda" and accusing me and Pahlevun of canvassing and having "a recent history of tag-teaming as pro-Iran regime." Also, you already made another accusation. Please, avoid repeating such comments; Act per WP:PA and "Comment on content, not on the contributor." The guideline adds that "Repeated or egregious personal attacks may lead to sanctions including blocks." Regards. --Mhhossein 20:03, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

SPI notice

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Misplaced Pages accounts for prohibited purposes. Please familiarize yourself with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Mangoeater1000.LM2000 (talk) 21:15, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Mercy College School of Business

Hi, I'm AngusWOOF. Psychonot, thanks for creating Mercy College School of Business!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Needs notability and significant coverage independent of Mercy College. Article as is has numerous references pointing to the website, press releases, non-notable "Patch" articles, and then directory listings

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:44, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Mercy College School of Business

Hi, I'm AngusWOOF. Psychonot, thanks for creating Mercy College School of Business!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Needs more information on its history, program reception (ranking among business schools), related organizations and businesses

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:48, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John Thompson (businessman)

Hello Psychonot,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged John Thompson (businessman) for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

00:23, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Dennis Di Lorenzo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dennis Di Lorenzo is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Dennis Di Lorenzo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. bonadea contributions talk 14:48, 29 June 2018 (UTC)