Revision as of 21:23, 10 October 2006 editByrgenwulf (talk | contribs)1,234 edits →{{User|Byrgenwulf}}← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:59, 13 August 2024 edit undoNewyorkbrad (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators45,481 edits update to remove reference to RfCs, as user-conduct RfCs were discontinued several years ago | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{historical}} | |||
<!-- {{adminbacklog}}--> | |||
{{editabuselinks}}<br /> | |||
<!-- Please remove/add HTML comments around {{adminbacklog}}. --> | |||
⚫ | |||
:'''This process has been discontinued per ].''' | |||
== New reports == | |||
==={{User|Byrgenwulf}}=== | |||
This user has engaged in repeated personal attacks for the last several months. I have been busy lately and I noticed a new onslaught of mean-spirited edits. I feel that his behavior constitutes stalking. I don't feel safe. He has repeatedly intimidated me and now he is escalating. I would really appreciate it if you could make this user stop stalking me. | |||
The personal attack intervention noticeboard (PAIN), created on ] ], was intended as a counterpart to ]. A person with complaints over ] could, after giving warnings, report a personal attacker on this page. | |||
Here, in an RfC for another user, he . Incidently, my edits were a plea to him to stop following me and writing about me. I did edit a page because (i.e., totally ad hominem). I asked him as nicely as possible to please edit the page or delete it because it was upsetting me! I only repeated the edit once and he harassed me with a warning. This obsessed focus is making me feel extremely uncomfortable and intimidated. Can you please help me? --] 21:16, 10 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Unfortunately, the noticeboard generated a considerable amount of controversy. While ] is usually a clear cut case, and administrator intervention (i.e. blocking) is usually uncontroversial, determining whether a comment is a personal attack, incivil, or just simply blunt and frank, can be quite ]. That led to a lot of arguments, flame wars, tit-for-tat disputes and ] on this page. Even after several warnings as well as changes to the header designed to instruct users on how to use this page, this noticeboard continued to deteriorate. Due to this deterioration as well as some particularly poor exchanges in December 2006, the entire page was ], with the result that the noticeboard was closed on {{#formatdate:10 January 2007}}. | |||
:Note: I would strongly advise any admin handling this to read not only the page, but also take note of edit by DrL. Pots and kettles come to mind. The page that is upsetting DrL is in dispute resolution (i.e. the RfC) where it is being used as evidence of the disturbing behaviour of her "friend" {{User|Asmodeus}} and herself. I called her ''behaviour'' devious, after she claimed to archive a warning on her talk page about page blanking, when she actually just deleted it. Her calling me "Byrgleturd", on the other hand, is not only childish, but obviously uncivil as well. ] 21:23, 10 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
The closure of this noticeboard does not mean that personal attacks are tolerated; they should never be. It simply means that complaints over personal attacks are moved to different, and more appropriate venues such as the ], ] or, as a last resort, ]. | |||
==Open reports== | |||
<!-- Place reports below this line only after there has been reply to the report --> | |||
=== |
===Procedure=== | ||
⚫ | ] | ||
Repeated personal attacks, since September. , (this happened several times well before also), but was more than unacceptable from him. --] 01:38, 9 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
* Examining both user's contributions now. - ]<span class="plainlinks"> </span> 11:33, 9 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
* This appears to be a complex situation involving nationalism and suspected sockpuppetry. Left messages with both users to seek dispute resolution. - ]<span class="plainlinks"> </span> 11:57, 9 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
*I do not know if it is appropriate to report here, but my suspicion that VinceB is a sockpuppetmaster has been confirmed by CheckUser (see ]). VinceB was blocked and warned. Since my and PANONIAN's suspicion was corroborated, I believe there is no reason to see it as a personal attack. I hope this case will be closed soon. ] 19:26, 10 October 2006 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 17:59, 13 August 2024
This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
- This process has been discontinued per this discussion.
The personal attack intervention noticeboard (PAIN), created on 7 October 2005, was intended as a counterpart to the request for intervention against vandalism page. A person with complaints over personal attacks could, after giving warnings, report a personal attacker on this page.
Unfortunately, the noticeboard generated a considerable amount of controversy. While vandalism is usually a clear cut case, and administrator intervention (i.e. blocking) is usually uncontroversial, determining whether a comment is a personal attack, incivil, or just simply blunt and frank, can be quite subjective. That led to a lot of arguments, flame wars, tit-for-tat disputes and wikilawyering on this page. Even after several warnings as well as changes to the header designed to instruct users on how to use this page, this noticeboard continued to deteriorate. Due to this deterioration as well as some particularly poor exchanges in December 2006, the entire page was nominated for deletion, with the result that the noticeboard was closed on 10 January 2007.
The closure of this noticeboard does not mean that personal attacks are tolerated; they should never be. It simply means that complaints over personal attacks are moved to different, and more appropriate venues such as the administrators' noticeboard, dispute resolution or, as a last resort, arbitration.
Procedure
Misplaced Pages:Personal attack intervention noticeboard/Header
Categories: