Revision as of 04:53, 8 November 2017 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,298,192 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:TheTimesAreAChanging/Archive 7) (bot← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:46, 22 December 2024 edit undoTheTimesAreAChanging (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users23,372 edits →Mujaheddin: Re. | ||
(563 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| algo = old(31d) | | algo = old(31d) | ||
| archive = User talk:TheTimesAreAChanging/Archive %(counter)d | | archive = User talk:TheTimesAreAChanging/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| counter = |
| counter = 11 | ||
| maxarchivesize = 70K | | maxarchivesize = 70K | ||
| archiveheader = {{Talk archive navigation}} | | archiveheader = {{Talk archive navigation}} | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| minthreadsleft = 4 | | minthreadsleft = 4 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ |
{{Archives|collapsed=yes|image=none|search=no|]]]]]]]]]}} | ||
== |
== Jan 2023 == | ||
@] Hello, its one thing to make valid criticism of an edit, its yet another to make adhominem attacks against other editors like you did here with no regards to ]. If you have doubts regarding my ], you are welcome to discuss the edits with ] and by ], so long as you stop making ]. | |||
]. You do know that article is under 1RR, right? <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 17:28, 7 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
~~ ] (]) 14:58 28 January 2023 | |||
:No, I wasn't. If I don't see the notice at the top while editing, I usually just assume the standard 3RR is in force. For what it's worth, I don't think that {{U|Blythwood}} was aware that the article is under 1RR, either. In any case, all of my reverts have already been reverted, so there's nothing left to self-revert.] (]) 18:23, 7 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
::No, sorry, I didn't know this either. There's no message in the edit window and no comment on the top of the page pointing it out. I've added one.<br>Regarding the "modern day presidential" quote, I do support having it because I think it sums up Trump's attitude to social media: that it allows him to bypass the media and get attention as part of being "modern day presidential". So I'm not saying it's representative of his Twitter posts (what is?) but I think it's a reasonable way of kicking off the article. Still, I don't disagree that having it above the infobox is ugly. How about putting it in the Background section ranged left? ] (]) 18:40, 7 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
:::Yeah I figured this was in good faith (for both of you) which is why I've pointed it out here.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 23:01, 7 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
] | |||
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the ] regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. | |||
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!<!--Template:DRN-notice--> ] (]) 02:18, 17 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
== Re: casualties == | |||
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
Times, I respect that you will actually have a civil discussion on this or other issues. If you'd accept some kind of dispute resolution, I'd appreciate that. I'm not 100% convinced of what should be in this article, but from a purely ''methodological'' perspective, refugees really do play a major role in the determination of casualties, and this is known among epidemiologists. I think it's also clear that the creation of refugees and orphans is ''directly'' related to casualties in a conflict. -] (]) 01:39, 18 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
== Our old friend == | |||
</div> | |||
Could it be him ?--] (]) 10:57, 25 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
</div> | |||
:It seems to me, for many reasons. {{U|BowlAndSpoon}} (formerly known as {{U|Iloveandrea}}), any words in your defense?] (]) 08:04, 26 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1258243506 --> | |||
::Does BAS got a standard offer?--] (]) 16:29, 26 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
:::If I remember correctly, that is what he told me. That said, it must have happened after the BowlAndSpoon account was created on November 22, 2015; {{U|YeOldeGentleman}} was indeffed just three days earlier. For what it's worth, I have not seen any problematic editing from the BowlAndSpoon account.] (]) 01:28, 27 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
== Dreamcast Sales Numbers == | |||
Not guilty on this one! You can IP me and whatever. I'm not up to much on Misplaced Pages at the moment. And thank you to TTAAC for his evenhanded comments about me here. --] (]) 20:32, 29 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
Please actually check out the source I posted. Its from Sega of Japans offical Website. It isn't from a press release but from the Dreamcast page in their Hardware History section. They (the page doesn't have an author listed) state that the Dreamcast sold more than 10 million units. Just because someone else once falsly claimed that it sold 10.6 million units, which Sega doesn't even claim just that it sold more than 10 million units, doesn't mean that the 9.13 million sales number is written in stone. The source for the Playstation 2 sales numbers on Misplaced Pages is basically the same thing, a page from the offical Sony Website about their hardware history so I do not understand why this page couldn't be used as a source for the sales numbers of the Sega Dreamcast despite literally being from Sega themselve. ] (]) 09:46, 28 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
Also – just to make some sort of token effort to save the AusLondoner person some possible grief – if you look at my history of bannage, I have never used two accounts concurrently. I have been banned, then set up a new one to carry on where I left off, but I've never used two accounts at once. | |||
:Here is the relevant excerpt. The page was released on Novmeber 5, 2018 and is entirely in japanese: | |||
YeOldeGentleman was me. --] (]) 20:42, 29 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
:セガ最後の家庭用ゲーム機『ドリームキャスト』は累計1,000万台あまりが世に送り出されました。 | |||
:Which translates to: | |||
:Sega's last home video game console, the Dreamcast, sold a total of more than 10 million units. | |||
:Here is a link to the page as well as a link to an archive of the page from 3 days ago: | |||
:https://www.sega.jp/history/hard/column/column_06.html | |||
:https://web.archive.org/web/20241007020058/https://www.sega.jp/history/hard/column/column_06.html ] (]) 09:54, 28 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
::{{U|178.27.108.243}}, I reviewed the source that you provided; however, it appears to be close to a blog post, and not obviously more reliable than the 9.13 million CESA figure reported in Zackariasson ''et al.'' (], 2012). | |||
::More broadly, what happens on the ] article has no direct bearing on ]. You are now edit-warring against a prior talk page consensus, complete with a notice not to change the sales figure without consensus. | |||
::If you would like to discuss this further, it may be more productive to do so with the community at ], rather than on my user talk page.] (]) 10:11, 28 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
::{{U|178.27.108.243}}, tangentially, fails ] because the sources do not state that {{tq|"'']'' is the best-selling Sega Saturn game."}} Regardless of the truth of the claim, you should be aware that Misplaced Pages has strict sourcing requirements that do not permit editors to engage in ] ] of reliable sources to reach conclusions not directly supported by the citations provided.] (]) 10:28, 28 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::You should change the Misplaced Pages page for Virtua Fighter 2 as well since its state there that: the top-selling game worldwide for the Sega Saturn . | |||
:::Can I add Virtua Fighter 2 as the best selling game if I write that it was only the best selling in Japan? | |||
:::I wasn't aware of 10.6 million claim nor of the debate about its credibility that happened nearly a decaded ago. | |||
:::I however fail to see how that claim and debate means that the Dreamcast section of: ''The encyclopedia of Sega video game consoles'' from Sega of Japan's offical website which according to the banner on its index page (found here: https://www.sega.jp/history/hard/index.html) is: ''based on existing documents/materials at Sega'' (Original Text in Japanese: セガに現存する資料をもとに、歴代セガハードをご紹介) isn't a crediable source. I doubt that the japanese employee who created those pages used english internet discussions and rumors about console sales numbers as a source. | |||
:::Your claim about Sega maybe just rounded up the Saturns unit sales number to 6 million also is just your speculation since you don't provide any proof. | |||
:::In the case of the Mega Drive which sold about 3.58 million units according to Famitus the Megad Drive section of: ''The encyclopedia of Sega video game consoles'' states that: ''More than 3 million units of the “Mega Drive” were sold in Japan.'' (Original Text in Japanese: 『メガドライブ』は日本において300万台以上が販売されました。) | |||
:::This doesn't prove that Sega didn't round up the Sega Saturn unit sales number but is at least an example form the same source that shows that for one of their other consoles they definitly didn't just round up to the next higher number. ] (]) 12:53, 28 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Mujaheddin == | |||
Standard offer, I've never received. No, actually I got one for another account, which I don't recall... but TTAAC secured that account's ban shortly afterwards! This is some time ago now, so recollection might be off. --] (]) 20:46, 29 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
Hello i noticed that you eliminated my modification on the page mujaheddin that says that mujaheddin were NATO allies, they were allies due to intervention of mujaheddin in the gulf war against Saddam Hussein ] (]) 13:08, 17 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{U|Boackandwhite}}, thank you for reaching out. Please provide a ] for ]. Regards,] (]) 03:49, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Oops! I just thought of one more thing! Shrike, you'll see I've stayed off Israel–Palestine. My recollection is I got a TBAN for it at some point, but it always got me into trouble, so I've stayed from it anyway. Similarly to most articles on US foreign relations, unless my own shitty country is involved e.g. Yemen. | |||
::okay i have a pdf about units involved in 1991 gulf war that include mujaheddin i'll use it ] (]) 09:32, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Here are some pretty Polki for you, Shrike: | |||
:::Since your source does not directly state that NATO is an ally of the mujahideen, your edit failed ] and has been If you disagree, then please provide a page number and quote of the relevant excerpt that verifies the claim. Thank you.] (]) 08:46, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Don't you like Polki? 😍😍😍 --] (]) 20:58, 29 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
== AN notice == | |||
This is to let you know that I have filed a complaint about you at AN. The specific link is ]. --] (]) 00:09, 27 October 2017 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 08:46, 22 December 2024
Archives |
/Archive 1/Archive 2/Archive 3/Archive 4/Archive 5/Archive 6/Archive 7/Archive 8/Archive 9 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Jan 2023
@TheTimesAreAChanging Hello, its one thing to make valid criticism of an edit, its yet another to make adhominem attacks against other editors like you did here with no regards to Assumimg Good Faith. If you have doubts regarding my WP:NPOV, you are welcome to discuss the edits with Civility and by focusing on the content, so long as you stop making Personal attacks. ~~ shadowwarrior8 (talk) 14:58 28 January 2023
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Dreamcast Sales Numbers
Please actually check out the source I posted. Its from Sega of Japans offical Website. It isn't from a press release but from the Dreamcast page in their Hardware History section. They (the page doesn't have an author listed) state that the Dreamcast sold more than 10 million units. Just because someone else once falsly claimed that it sold 10.6 million units, which Sega doesn't even claim just that it sold more than 10 million units, doesn't mean that the 9.13 million sales number is written in stone. The source for the Playstation 2 sales numbers on Misplaced Pages is basically the same thing, a page from the offical Sony Website about their hardware history so I do not understand why this page couldn't be used as a source for the sales numbers of the Sega Dreamcast despite literally being from Sega themselve. 178.27.108.243 (talk) 09:46, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Here is the relevant excerpt. The page was released on Novmeber 5, 2018 and is entirely in japanese:
- セガ最後の家庭用ゲーム機『ドリームキャスト』は累計1,000万台あまりが世に送り出されました。
- Which translates to:
- Sega's last home video game console, the Dreamcast, sold a total of more than 10 million units.
- Here is a link to the page as well as a link to an archive of the page from 3 days ago:
- https://www.sega.jp/history/hard/column/column_06.html
- https://web.archive.org/web/20241007020058/https://www.sega.jp/history/hard/column/column_06.html 178.27.108.243 (talk) 09:54, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- 178.27.108.243, I reviewed the source that you provided; however, it appears to be close to a blog post, and not obviously more reliable than the 9.13 million CESA figure reported in Zackariasson et al. (Routledge, 2012).
- More broadly, what happens on the PlayStation 2 article has no direct bearing on Dreamcast. You are now edit-warring against a prior talk page consensus, complete with a notice not to change the sales figure without consensus.
- If you would like to discuss this further, it may be more productive to do so with the community at Talk:Dreamcast, rather than on my user talk page.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 10:11, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- 178.27.108.243, tangentially, this edit fails verification because the sources do not state that
"Virtua Fighter 2 is the best-selling Sega Saturn game."
Regardless of the truth of the claim, you should be aware that Misplaced Pages has strict sourcing requirements that do not permit editors to engage in original synthesis of reliable sources to reach conclusions not directly supported by the citations provided.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 10:28, 28 November 2024 (UTC)- You should change the Misplaced Pages page for Virtua Fighter 2 as well since its state there that: the top-selling game worldwide for the Sega Saturn .
- Can I add Virtua Fighter 2 as the best selling game if I write that it was only the best selling in Japan?
- I wasn't aware of 10.6 million claim nor of the debate about its credibility that happened nearly a decaded ago.
- I however fail to see how that claim and debate means that the Dreamcast section of: The encyclopedia of Sega video game consoles from Sega of Japan's offical website which according to the banner on its index page (found here: https://www.sega.jp/history/hard/index.html) is: based on existing documents/materials at Sega (Original Text in Japanese: セガに現存する資料をもとに、歴代セガハードをご紹介) isn't a crediable source. I doubt that the japanese employee who created those pages used english internet discussions and rumors about console sales numbers as a source.
- Your claim about Sega maybe just rounded up the Saturns unit sales number to 6 million also is just your speculation since you don't provide any proof.
- In the case of the Mega Drive which sold about 3.58 million units according to Famitus the Megad Drive section of: The encyclopedia of Sega video game consoles states that: More than 3 million units of the “Mega Drive” were sold in Japan. (Original Text in Japanese: 『メガドライブ』は日本において300万台以上が販売されました。)
- This doesn't prove that Sega didn't round up the Sega Saturn unit sales number but is at least an example form the same source that shows that for one of their other consoles they definitly didn't just round up to the next higher number. 178.27.108.243 (talk) 12:53, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Mujaheddin
Hello i noticed that you eliminated my modification on the page mujaheddin that says that mujaheddin were NATO allies, they were allies due to intervention of mujaheddin in the gulf war against Saddam Hussein Boackandwhite (talk) 13:08, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Boackandwhite, thank you for reaching out. Please provide a reliable source for verification. Regards,TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 03:49, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- okay i have a pdf about units involved in 1991 gulf war that include mujaheddin i'll use it Boackandwhite (talk) 09:32, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Since your source does not directly state that NATO is an ally of the mujahideen, your edit failed verification and has been reverted. If you disagree, then please provide a page number and quote of the relevant excerpt that verifies the claim. Thank you.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 08:46, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- okay i have a pdf about units involved in 1991 gulf war that include mujaheddin i'll use it Boackandwhite (talk) 09:32, 18 December 2024 (UTC)