| Revision as of 19:25, 15 November 2017 editMarkBernstein (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,219 edits →Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:29, 17 December 2024 edit undoEaldgyth (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators152,813 edits Happy Holidays! | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | ||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|]|]}} | |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|]|]}} | ||
| Line 9: | Line 8: | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| == |
== A beer for you! == | ||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| Hi! | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I was wondering why I saw you clearing your talk page. ] (]) 04:49, 27 February 2019 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| :Gandy orders a second round. Cheers to one of our best! ] (]) 15:21, 27 February 2019 (UTC) | |||
| I reverted your edit of the MSNBC videos because they were actually CC-licened BY MSNBC on YouTube. Many videos on the MSNBC youtube page are cc-licensed - Feel free to take a look here: https://www.youtube.com/results?q=MSNBC&sp=EgIwAVAU | |||
| :<nowiki>*</nowiki>hic* here's another :) sláinte! ]]] 15:27, 27 February 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ] (]) 19:32, 1 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :In that case, no problem, and thanks! ] (]) 20:02, 1 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| == It's just a sideline term, not substantive content == | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''A Resilient Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I’m very sorry to see the harassment you have faced. Stay strong Volunteer Marek! ''']] (])''' 16:00, 2 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == A kitten for you! == | |||
| Sources say Arakan Muslims and Myanmar Muslims. But since it has now emerged that there are Hindus among them, I figured Arakan Indians would be better. I think it's fine for descriptive purposes. | |||
| ] | |||
| But I maintain strict adherence to sources for the substantive content.--] (]) 13:44, 4 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| A kitten in the hopes that it improves you evening. | |||
| <small>] <small><sup>Need help? ''']'''</sup></small></small> 12:23, 28 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
| Actually, I just found sources which use Arakan Indians.--] (]) 13:46, 4 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| <br style="clear: both;"/> | |||
| :I've started a section on talk.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 15:12, 4 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Glitch == | |||
| ==Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction== | |||
| {{Ivmbox | |||
| |2=Commons-emblem-hand.svg | |||
| |imagesize=50px | |||
| |1=<s>The following sanction now applies to you: | |||
| Hi! Looks like there was some sort of edit conflict glitch and your edit reverted a long comment from Nederlandse Leeuw (which is of interest to me because I was tagged in it). I reverted back, I hesitates because we had a little dustup at arbcon the other week so I thought it best to let you know directly what I was thinking and why I reverted your revert. Wish you the best. ] (]) 17:38, 24 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
| {{Talkquote|1=You are banned from all edits and pages related to immigration in the United States for three months.}} | |||
| :Yeah, don’t know what happened there. Thanks.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 20:11, 24 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Panama Section in 'Allegation of CIA trafficking' page == | |||
| You have been sanctioned See ]. | |||
| Sometime back you made this edit on the 'Allegations of CIA drug trafficking' page:. | |||
| This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an ] under the authority of the ]'s decision at ] and, if applicable, the procedure described at ]. This sanction has been recorded in the ]. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the ] to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be ] for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions. | |||
| There is talk of restoring that section (on-going) on that talk page....I give my thoughts there. I'd be interested to know what you think (maybe expand upon the reasons given in your edit summary)] (]) 18:17, 24 June 2023 (UTC) | |||
| You may appeal this sanction using the process described ]. I recommend that you use the ] if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.<!-- Template:AE sanction.--> ] (]) 09:23, 5 September 2017 (UTC)</s> | |||
| }} | |||
| == YGM == | |||
| As the sanctioning administrator, I am removing this; a review is not formally complete but I can see the writing on the wall and won't waste people's time by insisting on a formal closure. I've made some other comments at AN but doubt it would be productive to repeat them here, other than to echo MjolnirPants' sentiments below. This sanction is now void. ] (]) 11:59, 6 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :Very disappointing, GoldenRing, to see that you've shown absolutely no awareness of the nature or depth of your misconduct and that you're saying basically that you conceded only that your stance is no longer viable, while tossing in another slap at VM on the AN page and by your reference to (presumably only part of) MPants's statement here. I suggest you voluntarily step away from any topic related to American Politics for a good long while so that you have time to reflect on this. ]] 13:26, 6 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :: lol ] (]) 21:51, 6 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :::VM, It's bad enough you had to go through this mess and then have this harassment. I left a Harass-2 message on Saturnalia0 talk page. ]<sup>]</sup> 00:28, 7 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| No response needed, but occasionally things go to spam, so just letting you know. <span style="font-family:courier"> -- ]</span><sup class="nowrap">[]]</sup> <small>(she|they|xe)</small> 02:45, 16 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ==Notice that you are now no longer subject to the arbitration enforcement sanction== | |||
| As an uninvolved admin, per ] I remove this sanction which seems ill-advised, as the edits wrt AP2 are largely unproblematic. Criticism of an admin and/or his actions should not be used as a reason to place such sanctions, leaving very little substance to base this on. ] (]) 11:52, 5 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Volunteer Marek, my sincere apologies, I misread policy here and am not allowed to overturn this sanction on my own. THE ABOVE SANCTION BY GOLDENRING REMAINS IN PLACE FOR NOW. I (and many others) don't agree with it and will see how I can get it overturned, but for the time being the sanction by GoldenRing is valid. Again, my apologies for any confusion this may have caused and false hope this may have given. ] (]) 12:39, 5 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| Try the bookmark tip for quick WL access. You'll thank me later :) <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 02:55, 18 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Anti-schooling activism changes == | |||
| :Thanks.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 13:10, 18 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == File:AECases2020.png == | |||
| Please excuse me if this isn't the correct way of contacting you, I am new to wikipedia. Your removal of my edits on the anti-schooling activism page are vast. Perhaps it would be better for you to contribute to an article on the positive aspects of schooling instead, as your edits don't seem to be very fair . | |||
| For example this sentence had 4 references supporting it yet you deleted it: | |||
| Academic pressure and rigorous schooling has been pointed to as a cause of the high rate of suicide among South Korean adolescents. | |||
| Hello. If you think this file is no longer useful for Misplaced Pages, set template {{tl|db-author}} on its description page, please. — Ирука<sup>]</sup> 22:59, 1 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| If you thought one or two of the references didn't support the statement or weren't good references then it makes sense delete those references or edit the statement, but all the articles support the statement. | |||
| There is even a section on suicide because of school pressure here: https://en.wikipedia.org/Suicide_in_South_Korea | |||
| Why don't you delete that section as well? Is an NY times article about south korean suicide better than an NPR article? | |||
| This is just one example. In fact, most of the sentences you deleted have multiple references. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Edit: I now see the article has a talk page. I will copy my points there. Note someone else mentions agism in the talk section, which is something else you deleted. | |||
| (] (]) 21:38, 5 September 2017 (UTC)) | |||
| :Can you tell me which edits or article you're referring to? <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 21:19, 5 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| Reminds you of anything? :/ <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 09:49, 6 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :Lol.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 19:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ::Um... I hope my ping at ] didn't bother you. I didn't mean to remind you of what you went through but I was somewhat angry on your behalf. I didn't really know much about what Icewhiz did before I read your comment months ago and seeing {{u|FeydHuxtable}} write {{tq|Not sure why several seem to think exceptional editors like Wifione & Icewhiz had malcious intent? Ice used to be a fellow ARS member, he was unusually gentle until he suffered severe provocation. He only sought adminship as a means to fight a certain evil. His play for adminship might have failed, but he simply kept taking things to a new level until his will proved too great for the community to resist. Much as I believe Ice was mistaken in seeing said evil as residing in certain edtiors or being tolerated by Misplaced Pages as a whole, one has to admire his ingenuity & determintation to achieve rightful victory (as he saw it).}} bothered me. I was hoping that maybe the diff I shared would be like a ]? But I also didn't want to speak on your behalf because obviously you can do so for yourself (hence the courtesy ping). But again, I didn't mean to remind you what you went through. If you don't want me to ping you about similar situations in the future, I'll respect that. ] ] 14:09, 13 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == | |||
| I am referring to the deletion of the "Unfree child labour" and "School related stress and depression" paragraphs, though I haven't reviewed all the edits yet. I also mention a specific sentence deletion above. | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Anti-schooling_activism&type=revision&diff=790490946&oldid=790490881 | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| (] (]) 21:38, 5 September 2017 (UTC)) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small> | |||
| :Well, the idea that compulsory education is a form of child slavery ("unfree labor" and "child labor") is original research. Also fringe.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 22:08, 5 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| == possibly useful, probably unwanted advice == | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1187131902 --> | |||
| == Editor experience invitation == | |||
| I just wanted to say two things re. the disagreement between you (and numerous other) and Samsara/GoldenRing. | |||
| Hi Volunteer Marek :) I'm looking to interview people ]. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. ] ] 12:44, 4 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
| First, I want to say I think it would help you a lot if you toned down the rhetoric a bit. There's a lot of all caps and repeated statements that make it look a bit rant-y. | |||
| == Thanks for the hat-tip == | |||
| Second, I want to say that I agree with you completely from what I've seen of it. This looks like a couple of bad calls by a couple of admins circling the wagons. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em;">] ]</span> 22:10, 5 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :Yeah I know about the tone. I can't help it. I'm me.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 22:11, 5 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::I feel you. I know I can get a little grumpy myself. Sometimes, I have to respond, then carefully prune all the naturally-occurring insults, glowing recommendations for clinics still willing to perform lobotomies and poetic odes to the magnificence of the human capacity for stupidity from my comments before hitting post. Truth be told, I'd have been indeffed long ago if not for the preview button. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em;">] ]</span> 22:37, 5 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| It was a pleasant surprise to see your mention of me when completing the editor reflection. I'm impressed that you remember my early forays into privacy protection, and am flattered that they had a positive influence on you. There is a certain irony that, having written some of this stuff more than 15 years ago, my RL name and username are practically used interchangeably within the movement, and I've presented in many public fora under my own name. Wishing you well in the coming year, ] (]) 21:33, 18 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == It's barnstar time! == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | ||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: |
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:top;" | {{#ifeq:Current Events Barnstar|alt|]|]}} | ||
| |rowspan="2" | | |rowspan="2" | | ||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Current Events Barnstar''' | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| |style="vertical-align: |
|style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | nice catch on the map ] (]) 09:11, 26 December 2023 (UTC) | ||
| |} | |||
| |}<!--Template:The Barnstar of Diligence--> | |||
| == |
== Unsourced contributions == | ||
| Greetings, I'm in discussion with another editor regarding supposedly unsourced contributions to a few wiki articles, can you please help me check if those contribs are supported by sources provided. Discussions are at ] and ] , maybe suggest some forum where I can invite others to help, thanks! ] (]) 16:55, 30 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
| Where exactly did all these guys come from in the ] article? I don't get how they even know about it. None of them except Carptrash ever contributed much of anything to the article, except reverts. Are they on some kind of mailing list to advance conservative/ libertarian causes? Who knows. | |||
| == Happy New Year == | |||
| At any rate, I think the graph is important, but ultimately it's not a ''huge'' deal if it gets taken down. As long as the information in the graph remains in the article, that's okay with me. It's upsetting that we're being fought tooth-and-nail on this for something so well sourced and obivous. But that's wikipedia for you. ] (]) 23:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="border:2px ; background-color: #FDEE00;" | |||
| : That's a really good question right there. Anyway, if this graph doesn't work, a different graph can.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 00:09, 14 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="right" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2; vertical-align: left; height: 1.1em;" | ''']!''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Wishing you and yours a Happy New Year, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free and may Janus light your way. ] (]) 14:49, 31 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| ==DYK for The Torture Camp on Paradise Street== | |||
| == Help please == | |||
| {{ivmbox | |||
| |image = Updated DYK query.svg | |||
| |imagesize=40px | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that ], the author of ''''']''''', was placed in the ] for writing "]" in quotation marks in a social media post?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 00:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == The mention at ANI == | |||
| Hi there, I need a little help. Please take a look at the article ] to see if you can figure out the recent decision to delete and move the information to the main article, though I can't actually find the discussion. In my experience it is quite the norm to use separate political position pages and certainly appropriate for Cory Booker. Thanks. ] (]) 17:29, 17 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :Your silence has answered my ask for help, though not helpful and not ever experienced in my previous experiences in asking for help. Oh well, I am only grateful that all editors do not have the same outlook. Some of us like to work together and have a little fun too. I do. ] (]) 17:51, 22 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::Look, sorry, didn't get a chance to look at it. By the time I had some time it seemed to late. Please don't let that discourage you.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 19:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| can be ignored if you choose. Somebody thought they'd been outed is all. Or you can opine if you like but I just thought I would try to alleviate any christ what now thoughts you might have had. I'd give it a miss if I were you, since he will argue forever, but I didn't want to talk about you behind your back even in passing. Oh speaking of, if you still care about the place we do not name there's a thread about the steward elections; your name came up there but not in a bad way about you either ] (]) 16:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Apologies == | |||
| ==Happy First Edit Day!== | |||
| <!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | |||
| {{ombox | |||
| | name = First Edit Day | |||
| | image = ] | |||
| | imageright = ] | |||
| | style = border: 2px solid CornflowerBlue; background: linear-gradient(300deg, AliceBlue, LavenderBlush 30%, LavenderBlush 70%, AliceBlue); | |||
| | textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center; | |||
| | plainlinks = yes | |||
| | text = <big>'''Happy First Edit Day!'''</big><br />Hi Volunteer Marek! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made and became a Wikipedian! ] (]) 02:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| }} | |||
| == Request for amendment at ] about World War II and the history of Jews in Poland == | |||
| I'm sorry, Marek, for falsely accusing you of some kind of hypocrisy at AN. I've left a note there and struck my comment. Best, -] (]) 20:29, 18 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :It's all good, looks like honest mistake.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 22:47, 18 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hello Volunteer Marek, | |||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> --] (]) 23:07, 20 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| a request for amendment that affects the {{tqq|1-way interaction ban with Piotrus and a 1-way interaction ban with Volunteer Marek}} from the ] has been made at {{slink|Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Amendment_request:_World_War_II_and_the_history_of_Jews_in_Poland}}. Your input would be welcome. | |||
| == Vilnius University == | |||
| Best regards,<br>] (]) 23:37, 21 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| I would appreciate if you kept an eye on ] page as that hoax, which I removed today ] by the user who originally inserted it. – ] (]) 13:34, 25 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :Yeah I saw that. That user has made other sketchy edits elsewhere and I've notified an administrator.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 15:52, 25 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks. He reported me for "vandalism", but it is clear that he does not know the definition of vandalism. – ] (]) 17:06, 25 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Threading == | ||
| This is unrelated to our back-and-forth, but it is on the same article talk page. I indented and moved your 04:57, 7 July 2024 reply to JDiala because it split their reply to themselves. I hope you don't mind. ]. If you revert, I won't contest it. While I'm here, I struck the DE comment and the explanation is available with my 06:15, 7 July 2024 reply. Carry on, ] (]) 06:31, 7 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| You and DC need to stop edit warring over that graph. I'm tempted to go to AN3 now, but figured I should be polite and give you both a talk page message. ] ] 21:55, 27 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Utsa Patnaik == | |||
| {{ping|EvergreenFir}} - sure, the edit warring needs to stop. However, D.Creish (and this is a ] which somehow managed to cite obscure Misplaced Pages essay in their very first edit) refuses to actually discuss the issue on talk. For example, despite repeated inquiries they have not explained (in fact, they have not even tried to explain) why they are removing the graph but not the article text which says the exact same thing. That makes no sense. They just keep quoting that there's an RfC on ANOTHER article which is actually irrelevant. | |||
| Hello VolunteerMarek. I had a query about the reliability of ] on the ] article? I ask because you fully removed her opinion from the body on June 24 because it was apparently fringe, yet another even though it's not a summary of the body and with no remaining mention of Patnaik in the body. I think her view deserves some mention in the body but clearly what this anonymous user added is undue and not following Misplaced Pages's guidelines for the lead section. No other scholar even gets named in the lead apart from Patnaik. ] (]) 11:22, 13 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Notice that now they've started a second edit war over other material in the article. Notice also, that this account stays dormant for days with no edits to Misplaced Pages but somehow immediately pops up if I make an edit to that article (or the related "List of..." article). | |||
| :Patnaik , Monbiot and Hickel are most certainly fringe by any reasonable definition of fringe. “Comment is free” is not a reliable source.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 18:49, 14 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbitration motions regarding My very best wishes == | |||
| Yea, the edit warring needs to stop but removing well sourced material with no explanation is disruptive. Is this one of those times where I'm just suppose to accept that the way Misplaced Pages functions often fails and move on or something? <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 11:16, 28 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| The Arbitration Committee has resolved by ] that: | |||
| == You reverted without giving any reason == | |||
| {{ivmbox|] (the topic and interaction bans on ], respectively) are repealed.}} | |||
| And it has resolved by another ] that: | |||
| {{ivmbox|]' ] from World War II in Eastern Europe and the history of Jews in Eastern Europe, imposed under ], is repealed.}} | |||
| For the Arbitration Committee, ] ] 06:33, 8 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| : Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Arbitration motions regarding My very best wishes}}'''<!-- ] (]) 06:34, 8 August 2024 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes--> | |||
| === Arbitration amendment request archived === | |||
| Hi Marek, | |||
| The request for amendment in which those two motions were proposed has been closed and is archived at ]. The repeal of remedy 5.2 means that the ban on My very best wishes interacting with you has been lifted. ] ] 07:30, 8 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of Gąsawa massacre == | |||
| If you revert, you have to give a reason. Otherwise your revert is without justification and should be undone. | |||
| ] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at '''the entry on the Articles for discussion page''' ] (]) 16:26, 14 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :That's because this has already been extensively discussed, there's an RfC on the talk page etc. The reasons are there, you just need to pay attention to them.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 11:07, 28 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :: I need to ask then why you reverted my changes when it was discussed on the talk page and why you didn't pay attention to its edited ] (]) 05:03, 2 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::: And I need to ask why you're posting in this section. Are you the same user as above or something?<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 05:37, 2 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| == NPOV tag at List of monuments == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ], to which you have , is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or if it should be ]. | |||
| The discussion will take place at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
| To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit ]. Delivered by '']'' (]) 01:01, 15 September 2024 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template --> | |||
| Per the guidance at Template:POV, I am putting this notice at your talk page, and a notice at ] | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| I am tagging the History section at ] for the ongoing POV concerns previously under repeated discussion from the diagram. Please provide any suggestions for addressing the voiced concerns and otherwise moving towards consensus at ]. Thank you. ] (]) 04:42, 29 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| *{{tps}}What's the crux of the NPOV complaints about this graph? I fail to see how graphs can be NPOV internally, and I fail to see how the addition of this graph pushes a POV one way or the other. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em;">] ]</span> 12:25, 29 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| ::{{ping|MPants at work}} | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| ::Well, let's see. | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| ::First, they tried to pretend that the graph was "unsourced". Even though the source was given. | |||
| ::Then, they tried to pretend that the graph was "original research". Even though it exactly replicates the data from the source. | |||
| ::Then, they tried to pretend that the source was cherry picked and not reliable. Even though there's at least a dozen other sources which say the exact same damn thing. | |||
| ::Then, they tried to argue that these other dozen sources weren't legit because "real historians disagree". Even though over half of these dozen+ sources were from, you know, actual historians. | |||
| ::Then, they tried to dismiss these sources of actual historians because "these were just published in magazines and newspapers, not scholarly journals". Even though these actual historians were experts on the subject. | |||
| ::Then, they claimed that there were "several" or "multiple" or even "millions" (no, really) of sources out there which contradicted these actual historians. Even though they didn't bother providing a single freakin' one. | |||
| ::The . You can read it yourself and contribute. The discussion is one of the sorriest and most dishonest instances I've seen on Misplaced Pages in a while (and I've seen a lot) of individuals willfully trying to violate Misplaced Pages policies while veiling themselves in a whole bunch of self righteous bullshit excuses to push their POV. | |||
| ::<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 15:42, 29 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| == Move review == | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| An editor has asked for a ] of ]. Because you participated in the requested move, you might want to participate in the move review. ] (]) 05:09, 5 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| == Good humor == | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 --> | |||
| == Thank You == | |||
| Please note that TP headings should be neutral. See: ] and ]. Thanks. – ] (]) 06:35, 6 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :It's a genuine question. Now please leave my comments alone.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 06:39, 6 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::While you have your concerns, "anchoring" the thread heading with "joke" is not a neutral statement. As per the guidance, the talk page heading is ''not'' "your" comment. So please leave it alone as a neutral statement of concern. – ] (]) 06:43, 6 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :::I don't know where you got the idea that you're some kind of TPG police but last I checked no one appointed you as such. It's a genuine question so leave it alone. If the nature of the section title bothers you, well, maybe it's because the nature of the discussion on the talk page IS a joke.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 06:49, 6 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::::You could at least try to be a collaborative editor, VM. Why do you always have to push your POV and be the only one who is right? Listen to what other editors are saying to you instead of being so defensive. S. Rich is one of the most neutral and accommodating editors I have ever had the opportunity to work with, and his ability to compromise is commendable. <sup><font style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">]</font>]]</sup> 20:10, 6 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :::::I *don't* push my POV so your question is already in bad faith. Why do you always have to be disruptive and why do you always use false and disingenuous claims to try and force your way through? Why do you always go running to admins to try and bully your way on articles? Etc. I'm perfectly collaborative and helpful as long as you come at me straight and quit it with the stupid games.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 20:28, 6 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Well that response certainly opened the doors to communication. <sup><font style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">]</font>]]</sup> 20:34, 6 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::I think those doors were already set when you started your message with "You could at least try..." and "Why do you always have to..." How do you expect me to respond? I have no idea why you think that you coming to my talk page and attacking me will somehow improve matters.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 20:38, 6 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::(a day or two after you went running to a perceived-to-be-amiable-to-blocking-me admin over a false claim of a 1RR violation and tried to get me blocked. Yeah, that opened up doors) <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 20:40, 6 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| {{od}} That isn't at all what happened...again, you continuously jump to conclusions, and I highly recommend another form of exercise. VM, I'm not and never have attempted to disparage you - the total opposite is true. Perhaps if you'd at least try to understand what others are saying, we'd have a much happier environment to work in. I'm not an advocate of any kind...my ONLY goal on WP is to contribute to the quality of this encyclopedia. I have worked to help promote GAs and FAs, and my editing patterns will support my claims. I don't give a big rat's behind what the topic is - I look only at the cited sources, the facts and how they are presented. I didn't fall of a pumpkin truck yesterday. I am a team player, unless a member of the team forces others to do things their way or the highway, and quite frankly, that is how you've treated me. I'm not some newbie who is going to go running with my tail tucked because the bully called me names - I will confront the situation, and do my best to defuse it. You've been editing WP for a very long time, you have done good work, and nobody is trying to take that away from you. I'm not the editor you've portrayed me to be, and WP would be a much happier place if you'd simply stop putting editors into categories they don't belong. <sup><font style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">]</font>]]</sup> 21:16, 6 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :Well, obviously my perception of your edits is quite different than your own self-perception, though I'm sure there are topics where you are a good editor. But my experience interacting with you on this particular topic has shown the opposite.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 21:18, 6 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for the work on Yalta's page and combating Russian Operatives spreading misinformation and propaganda. ] (]) 08:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for October 7== | |||
| ==Io Saturnalia!== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] ( | ). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| {| style="border:2px ; background-color: #FF0000;" | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:14, 7 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="right" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| == Breitbart News == | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2; vertical-align: left; height: 1.1em;" | '''Io, ]!''' | |||
| |- | |||
| Hi. was a violation of active arbitration remedies. Please self-revert, or I will report you to AE. You need to get consensus before re-adding this content. I'm happy to continue discussing on the article talk page. --] (]) 18:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. ] (]) 15:29, 17 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == opinion piece in Breitbart by former editor name-checks you == | |||
| In case you weren't already aware of this, thought you'd find informative. Or at least amusing. ] (]) 17:53, 9 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :Lol, Breitbart, go do something better with your lives, like, report actual news? ] (]) 15:43, 12 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :"(Disclosure: the author of this article has had disputes with several of the parties involved.)" Just......lol... ] (]) 15:45, 12 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == A 2nd opinion? == | |||
| Hey Marek, | |||
| "Attack Helicopter" showed up again today. I think it's suspicious, especially as the page it showed up at (]) was just recently semiprotected due to IP vandalism. Could I get a second opinion? ] (]) 23:52, 12 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :Morty, Wikipedians are not supposed to call in reinforcements. Are you aware of ]?] (]) 03:39, 13 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::I don't think this is canvassing since that account looks like an obvious sock puppet and there's some history here.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 04:29, 13 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :::Was asking for a 2nd opinion to see if my suspicions were justified, but it's damn interesting that Anythingyouwant followed me to your talk page, Marek! ] (]) 04:32, 13 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :::Do you think the return of "Attack Helicopter" is worth trying to make a report? ] (]) 06:02, 13 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Tossing/Distributing Paper Towels in the ] article == | |||
| Just a FYI. I am a different person than the editor at IP address 212.92.121.87. Thanks. ] (]) 23:31, 15 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :np.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 23:32, 15 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ==President of USVI== | |||
| I'm wondering if really belongs in the article? It's obviously V RS and consistent with criticisms that Trump is clueless about USVI and much else, but how directly does it bear upon the WH response to Maria or criticism thereof...? My concern is that we not water down the humanitarian crisis with gaffes and wars of words. For example, I'm not 100% sure I should've added either... but, like your addition, it probably does help contextualize the train wreck as it unfolds. --] (]) 08:40, 16 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ==Trump Endorsements== | |||
| How come the additions that I made to ] were removed? Each addition that I made has a citation that supports what the position of the person involved listed for the actors and comedians section. --] (]) 13:45, 16 October 2017 (ET) | |||
| == {{yo|User:D.Creish}} Previous Accounts == | |||
| Hi, | |||
| You've made some variation of a number of times on various talk pages. There may be something to it, but article talk is not the proper place to discuss. You've been here a while and you know better than I do how to address it correctly so please do so. | |||
| Thanks –] ] 02:14, 22 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :I've tried raising the matter elsewhere but they have evaded the question every single time. The fact that D.Creish continues to make controversial edits which violate Misplaced Pages policies in a ] way in a controversial topic area rife with sock puppets of banned users, establishes that this is matter of ].<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 02:17, 22 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::Where did you bring it up? I couldn't find the sockpuppet investigation. –] ] 02:48, 22 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Talk page == | |||
| Hi. Just letting you know I've put a short semi-protection on your talk page due to the vandalism - hope that's OK with you. ] (]) 13:16, 22 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :Well he vandalized my intelligent discussion on the Richard Spencer page. ] (]) 03:38, 23 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Why did you try to censor discussion because of your left wing bias? == | |||
| ] | |||
| Maybe you should leave wikipedia if you are here to be biased and force your left wing agenda down people's throats. ] (]) 03:37, 23 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :Marek, We are forming a "Communist Party of Misplaced Pages" for all editors who have been thus named. Want to join? You'd be 002. ] (]) 03:46, 23 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::If it is a Jewish Cosmopolitan Communist Party, then I guess that I will be forced to join, just to keep trolls at bay momentarily. ] ] 03:54, 23 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Are you members of Antifa? Do you attack women and children over the head with bikelocks? ] (]) 03:59, 23 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::::It's interdenominational. Still interested? Antifa is mostly made up of undercover local and federal agents. So they are not members and visa versa. ] (]) 04:04, 23 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::Raise the Red Banner for Rainbow Stalin's Communist Party. ] (]) 05:46, 23 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Do they have a disabled black lesbian faction dedicated to defending transgender illegal immigrants? If so, sign me up. ] ] 05:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| These are PA's and should stop before those making them are reported. I think these are bad faith enough to get a block.] (]) 09:39, 23 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :LiberatorLX is already blocked, and the rest is clearly just humour. ] (]) 09:43, 23 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::Given the tone on certain other threads I am not sure some of it is just humour. So I am taking this opportunity to remind certain editors that making comments about other users perceived political bias are PA's and thus actionable.] (]) 09:59, 23 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :::Well, the only one I see making comments here about other users' perceived political bias is LiberatorLX. As for the responses, I presume you haven't seen the torrent of abuse to which Volunteer Marek has been subjected recently? I can understand if you missed it, as it's all been reverted and suppressed quite quickly, but you can see evidence of some of it in this talk page history. In the light of that, I see this interchange as clearly just a light-hearted way of dismissing the troll and offering Volunteer Marek a bit of moral support. ] (]) 10:12, 23 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Then I think we will have to agree to disagree.] (]) 10:14, 23 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| I give my permission for you guys to have your fun here. At least I personally don't perceive any of these as personal attacks. It's pretty funny.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 13:12, 23 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :Well my only wikiblock (a one day topic block) happened when I suggested that all the brand new ] were probably communists, so it nice to see Marek's okay with it. ] is a pretty good example of that. ] (]) 03:58, 24 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::] are also communists. ] (]) 17:31, 24 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :::Yeah, they are more like ]. ] (]) 18:03, 24 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ==Comment on Tongo Tongo ambush DYK nomination== | |||
| Hello - I want to make sure you are aware of a comment I left at ]. Thanks for all you do to make Misplaced Pages a valuable resource. ] (]) 02:46, 24 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Geller == | |||
| Just letting you know you're on 3RR on the article. ] (]) 20:31, 30 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 00:36, 7 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :I opened a section on the Antifa TP to include a sub-section on the fake Antifa news. Perhaps move it there as I'm sure this will not be the last one.] (]) 11:42, 7 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ==DYK for Tongo Tongo ambush== | |||
| {{ivmbox | |||
| |image = Updated DYK query.svg | |||
| |imagesize=40px | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that ] suggested that President Donald Trump's response to the deaths of four American soldiers in the ''']''' in Niger might become his ]?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and it may be added to ] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (] '''·''' ]) 00:02, 8 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == == | |||
| You must be kidding? | |||
| ]] 17:14, 8 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| p.s. don't reply -- it will attract "visitors" 😨 | |||
| :Even though nobody will gimme credit, I *do* actually try to assume good faith to the extent that is possible. But yeah, here on Misplaced Pages, very often it very quickly becomes impossible. Visitors, shmizitorz.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 17:16, 8 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::Good attitude. I like it. Ignore the ants and think of it as cute squirrels at the picnic. That's what separates you men from the boys. ]] 17:18, 8 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :::Come to think of it, makes sense. Most of what appeals to them is nuts. ]] 17:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| VM, you know full well and have been told before: A talk page is not the place to accuse people of DS violations. If you think you have a case, take it to AE, or to an uninvolved admin who handles that kind of thing. Making public accusations in the wrong venue is just ] which is a personal attack. Don't do it again. --] (]) 01:25, 9 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion == | |||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of an ] decision.] (]) 05:53, 9 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Request == | |||
| Hello, {{u|Volunteer Marek}}. Sorry for dropping by, this is about Hidden Tempo. Although you have indicated that the ] can be removed freely, I would still like to confirm with you before removing them (since it's being requested). I was wondering if there are any evidence to substantiate the claims (it's not needed now; just in case if I need to request them at some point). Regards, ] (]) 18:48, 9 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes you can remove it and yes there is evidence.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 18:52, 9 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == The other white meat == | |||
| You missed this one. The one where he claims it would have been reversed on appeal except for that it wasn't reversed on appeal. . ]] 02:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == What talk pages are not == | |||
| Article talk pages are for disusing the article and how to improve it, not other edds, please stop.] (]) 18:33, 12 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :What are you referring to? You sure you got the right editor? <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 18:34, 12 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::, the page is not about him or his actions.] (]) 18:42, 12 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :::Well, seeing as this is EXACTLY what ] got topic banned from the article for (as well as edit warring on the talk page) I think it's relevant. I'm actually doing him a favor by bringing it up on article talk - in the hope he gets a clue and quits before he gets blocked - rather than running to WP:ANI, WP:AE or some administrators, though I'm sure he doesn't realize it nor appreciate it.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 18:45, 12 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::::No it is not as that is not what article talk pages are for.] (]) 18:55, 12 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::I think what ] is trying to say is that you should have made those comments on the other editor's talk page. It is quite reasonable to bring up your concerns with other editors' actions, just away from the article or it's pages. I believe that was the point raised. You do some great work on tough, controversial subjects; thanks for all you do. ] (]) 23:54, 12 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> ] (]) 19:09, 12 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ==Bedtime reading== | |||
| ] and ]. Have a good evening. ] (]) 04:55, 13 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ==Battle of Legnica== | |||
| Hi, most of my books I left at my parents home. About battle of Legnica, I only have in my home a book "Legnica 1241" by Jerzy Maroń. If you want, I can quote a fragment of a book referring to the size of the Polish dukes army.] (]) 18:59, 13 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction == | |||
| Per ] at the ], you are now subject to the following restrictions: | |||
| * You are banned from all edits and articles related to Donald Trump for one month. This is subject to the ]. | |||
| * You are banned from interacting with {{noping|James J. Lambden}} and {{noping|TheTimesAreAChanging}} for three months. This is subject to the ] plus you may report violations of this IBAN to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You are counselled to not use the exceptions for vandalism and BLP violations except in the most obvious of obvious cases. | |||
| * You are warned to edit collegially. | |||
| ] (]) 10:37, 15 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :You finally got your way, didn't you? <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 14:19, 15 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::Agreed.] (]) 19:25, 15 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:29, 17 December 2024
|
The Barnstar of Good Humor | |
| "happy that we finally got a 'self-described neutral observer'" - that made me laugh. That was a positive add. Rockypedia (talk) 00:02, 30 August 2017 (UTC) |
A beer for you!
|
I was wondering why I saw you clearing your talk page. Drmies (talk) 04:49, 27 February 2019 (UTC) |
- Gandy orders a second round. Cheers to one of our best! Gandydancer (talk) 15:21, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- *hic* here's another :) sláinte! ——SerialNumber54129 15:27, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
|
A Resilient Barnstar |
| I’m very sorry to see the harassment you have faced. Stay strong Volunteer Marek! starship.paint (talk) 16:00, 2 October 2019 (UTC) |
A kitten for you!
A kitten in the hopes that it improves you evening.
HighInBC 12:23, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Glitch
Hi! Looks like there was some sort of edit conflict glitch and your edit reverted a long comment from Nederlandse Leeuw (which is of interest to me because I was tagged in it). I reverted back, I hesitates because we had a little dustup at arbcon the other week so I thought it best to let you know directly what I was thinking and why I reverted your revert. Wish you the best. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:38, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, don’t know what happened there. Thanks. Volunteer Marek 20:11, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
Panama Section in 'Allegation of CIA trafficking' page
Sometime back you made this edit on the 'Allegations of CIA drug trafficking' page:.
There is talk of restoring that section (on-going) on that talk page....I give my thoughts there. I'd be interested to know what you think (maybe expand upon the reasons given in your edit summary)Rja13ww33 (talk) 18:17, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
YGM
No response needed, but occasionally things go to spam, so just letting you know. -- Tamzin (she|they|xe) 02:45, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2023-09-16/Serendipity
Try the bookmark tip for quick WL access. You'll thank me later :) Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:55, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
File:AECases2020.png
Hello. If you think this file is no longer useful for Misplaced Pages, set template {{db-author}} on its description page, please. — Ирука 22:59, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2023-11-06/Arbitration report
Reminds you of anything? :/ Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:49, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- Lol. Volunteer Marek 19:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- Um... I hope my ping at WT:RFA didn't bother you. I didn't mean to remind you of what you went through but I was somewhat angry on your behalf. I didn't really know much about what Icewhiz did before I read your comment months ago and seeing FeydHuxtable write
Not sure why several seem to think exceptional editors like Wifione & Icewhiz had malcious intent? Ice used to be a fellow ARS member, he was unusually gentle until he suffered severe provocation. He only sought adminship as a means to fight a certain evil. His play for adminship might have failed, but he simply kept taking things to a new level until his will proved too great for the community to resist. Much as I believe Ice was mistaken in seeing said evil as residing in certain edtiors or being tolerated by Misplaced Pages as a whole, one has to admire his ingenuity & determintation to achieve rightful victory (as he saw it).
bothered me. I was hoping that maybe the diff I shared would be like a victim impact statement? But I also didn't want to speak on your behalf because obviously you can do so for yourself (hence the courtesy ping). But again, I didn't mean to remind you what you went through. If you don't want me to ping you about similar situations in the future, I'll respect that. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 14:09, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- Um... I hope my ping at WT:RFA didn't bother you. I didn't mean to remind you of what you went through but I was somewhat angry on your behalf. I didn't really know much about what Icewhiz did before I read your comment months ago and seeing FeydHuxtable write
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Editor experience invitation
Hi Volunteer Marek :) I'm looking to interview people here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 12:44, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for the hat-tip
It was a pleasant surprise to see your mention of me when completing the editor reflection. I'm impressed that you remember my early forays into privacy protection, and am flattered that they had a positive influence on you. There is a certain irony that, having written some of this stuff more than 15 years ago, my RL name and username are practically used interchangeably within the movement, and I've presented in many public fora under my own name. Wishing you well in the coming year, Risker (talk) 21:33, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
|
The Current Events Barnstar | |
| nice catch on the map Elinruby (talk) 09:11, 26 December 2023 (UTC) |
Unsourced contributions
Greetings, I'm in discussion with another editor regarding supposedly unsourced contributions to a few wiki articles, can you please help me check if those contribs are supported by sources provided. Discussions are at Talk:Belarusian nationalism#Nationalists were also opposed by the local intellectuals and User talk:RusHistorian#December 2023 , maybe suggest some forum where I can invite others to help, thanks! ManyAreasExpert (talk) 16:55, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy New Year
|
Happy New Year! | |
| Wishing you and yours a Happy New Year, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free and may Janus light your way. Ealdgyth (talk) 14:49, 31 December 2023 (UTC) |
DYK for The Torture Camp on Paradise Street
On 27 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Torture Camp on Paradise Street, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Stanislav Aseyev, the author of The Torture Camp on Paradise Street, was placed in the Izolyatsia torture camp for writing "Donetsk People's Republic" in quotation marks in a social media post? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Torture Camp on Paradise Street. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Torture Camp on Paradise Street), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
The mention at ANI
can be ignored if you choose. Somebody thought they'd been outed is all. Or you can opine if you like but I just thought I would try to alleviate any christ what now thoughts you might have had. I'd give it a miss if I were you, since he will argue forever, but I didn't want to talk about you behind your back even in passing. Oh speaking of, if you still care about the place we do not name there's a thread about the steward elections; your name came up there but not in a bad way about you either Elinruby (talk) 16:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
 | Happy First Edit Day! Hi Volunteer Marek! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC) |  |
Request for amendment at WP:ARCA about World War II and the history of Jews in Poland
Hello Volunteer Marek,
a request for amendment that affects the 1-way interaction ban with Piotrus and a 1-way interaction ban with Volunteer Marek
from the World War II and the history of Jews in Poland case has been made at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment § Amendment request: World War II and the history of Jews in Poland. Your input would be welcome.
Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:37, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Threading
This is unrelated to our back-and-forth, but it is on the same article talk page. I indented and moved your 04:57, 7 July 2024 reply to JDiala because it split their reply to themselves. I hope you don't mind. Link for review. If you revert, I won't contest it. While I'm here, I struck the DE comment and the explanation is available with my 06:15, 7 July 2024 reply. Carry on, Mr rnddude (talk) 06:31, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Utsa Patnaik
Hello VolunteerMarek. I had a query about the reliability of Utsa Patnaik on the Bengal Famine of 1943 article? I ask because you fully removed her opinion from the body on June 24 because it was apparently fringe, yet another anonymous user on July 1 added a whole paragraph sourced to Patnaik to the lead about inflation even though it's not a summary of the body and with no remaining mention of Patnaik in the body. I think her view deserves some mention in the body but clearly what this anonymous user added is undue and not following Misplaced Pages's guidelines for the lead section. No other scholar even gets named in the lead apart from Patnaik. 185.21.22.198 (talk) 11:22, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- Patnaik , Monbiot and Hickel are most certainly fringe by any reasonable definition of fringe. “Comment is free” is not a reliable source. Volunteer Marek 18:49, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Arbitration motions regarding My very best wishes
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Remedies 5.1 and 5.2 of World War II and the history of Jews in Poland (the topic and interaction bans on My very best wishes, respectively) are repealed.
And it has resolved by another motion that:
My very best wishes' topic ban from World War II in Eastern Europe and the history of Jews in Eastern Europe, imposed under the Eastern Europe contentious topic procedures, is repealed.
For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 06:33, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motions regarding My very best wishes
Arbitration amendment request archived
The request for amendment in which those two motions were proposed has been closed and is archived at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment/Archive 128#Amendment request: World War II and the history of Jews in Poland. The repeal of remedy 5.2 means that the ban on My very best wishes interacting with you has been lifted. SilverLocust 💬 07:30, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Gąsawa massacre
Gąsawa massacre has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Articles for discussion page Polski Piast from Poland (talk) 16:26, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Gąsawa massacre for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gąsawa massacre, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Gąsawa massacre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Thank You
Thank you for the work on Yalta's page and combating Russian Operatives spreading misinformation and propaganda. 69.61.139.83 (talk) 08:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Io Saturnalia!
.jpg)
|
Io, Saturnalia! | |
| Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. Ealdgyth (talk) 15:29, 17 December 2024 (UTC) |