| Revision as of 16:02, 13 October 2006 editRholton (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,844 edits →Your changes to []: suggestion← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 11:39, 22 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (113 intermediate revisions by 29 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| *'''THIS PAGE IS WORK IN PROGRESS, FOLLOWING OTHER USERS COMMENT I AM IN THE PROCESS OF REBUILDING WITH THE ENTIRE HISTORY PLEASE ALLOW ME TIME TO DO SO''' | |||
| '''Welcome!''' | |||
| Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or place <code>{{helpme}}</code> on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ] | <span style="color: green;" lang="pa">ਸੁਖ</span> | ] 12:01, 21 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your changes to ]== | |||
| Hi, | |||
| Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. I've commented on your changes at ]. Thanks. ] | <span style="color: green;" lang="pa">ਸੁਖ</span> | ] 12:01, 21 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Blocked == | |||
| :Hi, I've replied again on both my talk page and the article talk page. ] | <span style="color: green;" lang="pa">ਸੁਖ</span> | ] 16:07, 21 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ]You have been temporarily ] because of your disruptive edits. You are ] in a ] as soon as the block expires. // ] (]) 21:26, 16 November 2006 (UTC) <br clear="both"> | |||
| == veganism and child abuse == | |||
| == Re: ] and BK Followers== | |||
| Please read and understand ]. Your changes to ] were reverted by two separate editors, and you were invited to discuss changes on ], yet you persist in re-adding your link and have thus reverted for the 3rd time today. If you wish to cite the ''news articles'' cited in the link, that would be appropriate, but the page to which you are pointing does not provide any additional factual information, rather it is a site for promoting low-carb diets. ] <sup>]</sup> 22:43, 21 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===Message for admins.=== | |||
| : Please reply here. For the record, here's , , , . I'm not calling your character in to question. I don't disagree that the behavior should be discussed, but cite the news articles instead; that page provides no additional factual information, only a sloppy rant. ] <sup>]</sup> 22:12, 22 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| There is a BK Follower Riveros11, using various IP in the Tampa Flordia 72.xx.xx.xx range, that is trying any trick in the Wiki book to block any other contributor outside of the BKWSU to the above page. | |||
| ==Resources on the Vegan Family== | |||
| This may serve as a good link for children and Veganism: http://www.veganfamily.co.uk/vegankidsroom.html | |||
| It has several links including one to La Leche League, the issues concerning pregnancy, breast feeding and general nutrition of children on a Vegan diet. Happy debate.] 12:30, 22 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Oganisation== | |||
| The authority is called experience. Knowing the people who attend and run the organisation, knowing what they wish to achieve (hence free to all to benefit all). Rape and abuse and all the rest of it is nonsense. | |||
| If you really want to "know" or evaluate something, you really need to go to the source and test it for yourself or investigate for yourself. | |||
| For the record, I have tried to engage in Discussion, formal Mediation and Arbitration and he has refused to co-join despite being informed. I have also put in a RfC for use of self-published material within the set limitation according to policy. Two admins have agreed that this is inline with policy already. | |||
| I understand were you are coming from, but the reality is that it is not true. I was a student there before( From the ages 10 - 19 - and i was not abused or know of anyone who was) | |||
| And may i ask my dear friend "what give you the Authority" to write what you are writing, In all honesty someone from bkwsu should be writing about the bkwsu instead of people who are not exactly involved there, that goes for most things really. | |||
| Rather than engage in discussion, Riveros appears to me to just be intimidating folk off with endless and often erroneous Vandalism accusations, including newcomers. I am going to remove those to give the newcomers an easier ride. I have no fear that I am doing the right think. Help .. don't bite. | |||
| ], | |||
| ] 23:41, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Okay, there is alot there. I will get back to you soon. i have exams coming up. so will discuss soon ] (placed here for .244...) | |||
| Jesselp, Please don't place things on user page, place comment in discussion page. PEACE] 14:16, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| When someone writes about ones self it is called an autobiography, self promotion or advertising. If you want to learn more please feel free to click on all the links ( http://en.wikipedia.org/Brahma_Kumaris_World_Spiritual_Organisation)provided including the "Organisation's" which are about five in total. So, there is a way for an individual to make up their own mind and see all points of view. Peace] 21:52, 25 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| You enjoy to taking things out of context, read what i have to say propperly in the context, then you will understand what im saying , jesselp. | |||
| ==Time to rebuild== | |||
| <div style="float:center;border-style:solid;border-color:blue;background-color:AliceBlue;border-width:1px;text-align:left;padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
| It sounds like you are going to restore the whole page- if so, I applaud your choice to do say. It raises your credibility in my eyes and probably others as well. I will peak back in a couple of days. ] 02:32, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| {{{1|]}}} has smiled at you! Smiles promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{tls|smile}}, {{tls|smile2}} or {{tls|smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! {{{2|}}} | |||
| ==Hello== | |||
| </div><!-- Template:smile3 -->] 14:19, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I looked over a bit of your request for arbitration. There are many ways to avoid this lengthy, time consuming (on the part of both yourselves and arbitors), process that can sometimes get very ugly. | |||
| I'm a member of two (or maybe even three) Seperate WikiProjects that have could perhaps provide assistance. In any case, I'm willing to provide you with assitance. | |||
| ==brahma kumaris reply== | |||
| Please see ]. I merely did not think the nuclear war crap was part of their beliefs, though the org looks kind of shady.] <font color = "blue"><sub>]</sub></font> 01:53, 2 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| As a member of a fairly new religious movement myself, I can sympathise with your passion in this matter. I could tell you TONS of stories, but I would rather assist you both in creating the best article you can. | |||
| :I'm not a member, never have been, never will be. I was merely curious and doubtful. I stick with ] and ].] <font color = "blue"><sub>]</sub></font> 04:11, 2 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Please leave a message on my talk page, and I can give you both more information about how I can be of assistance. | |||
| ::Greetings .244, | |||
| ::"( ... file under "all hat and no cattle")."? | |||
| ::Here is my hat and I don't have time to take a picture of the cattle!] | |||
| ::PEACETalkAbout 00:50, 8 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| You're certainly free to do whatever you want, but take it from me - it's much better to perhaps see things in a different light and work towards a common goal than go to arbitration. | |||
| == Your changes to ] == | |||
| Sincerely, | |||
| ] 04:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::PS: With the current neutrality tag on it, I suggest that few readers are going to give much weight to ''anything'' written there, and ''everyone'' loses - including the readers. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 05:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> | |||
| I have reverted your changes to ]. You removed content that other editors had added in such a was as to alter their comments. If you continue with this you will be blocked. –]]– 04:21, 12 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Whoops! Sorry, forgot to sign.] 06:18, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::Well heavens, I guess I should have read the talk page before I made my offer. In any case, it still stands. If I can be of service, please let me know.] 07:24, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :You removed significant portions of another editor's post, where that user was referring to past behavior of having issues raised by other editors removed instead of addressed. In this case, a "fresh start" sounds like a way of not addressing issues raised in the past. –]]– 12:17, 12 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Hello again== | |||
| I am writing to let you know that I unfortunately need to rescind my offer of personal assistance. Currently, there are great demands on my time - both here and in real life. I encourage you to contact the ], make a ] to the general community, or simply seek a ]. You may also consider posting a message on the noticeboards for various ] that are appropriate to the topic. | |||
| I will reiterate, it is simply best to try to reach consensus with your fellow editors based on the common goal of writing a fair and well-written article. As long as you can at least share this small patch of common ground, there is hope. | |||
| :If I have introduced an error into the article, please do fix it. I assure you it was unintentional. I was attempting to slightly reorganize the opening section for readability, and to better conform to Misplaced Pages style. As I alluded to in my first post, I am not, nor do I have any desire to become, an expert on this topic. I am a bit dismayed that you are concluding that we will be having problems. I hope to keep people focused on improving the article according to Misplaced Pages standards and acceptable behavior. If ''that'' results in a problem between you and I, the source of the problem will be clear. Note that I have not "thrown around my wieght" as an admin. Nothing I have done so far required any admin powers. I did mention the possibility of blocking you (above) for altering the substance of another's edits. Believe me when I say that I showed much more patience than most admins would. I hope we have no reason to have "problems" in the future. –]]– 20:36, 12 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Sincerely, | |||
| :Thank you for your latest comments on my talk page. I'll review the BKWSU talk page and see about archiving more. | |||
| ] 05:03, 8 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Your question == | |||
| :I do have a request: please consider getting an account/username. Note that you can do this completely anonymously (much more so than having your IP address shown). I find it useful to refer to people by names as opposed to numbers, even if the names are nonsensical. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| :Please do understand that I'm only requesting/suggesting. You may continue to contribute as you have been without prejudice.–]]– 16:02, 13 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Jossi, | |||
| that really is not the place for further discussion on this matter ]. What the likelihood of it succeeding without further contention? Why does the same principle not apply to pages on the other major "new religious movements"" Why not go engage them? | |||
| I am asking honest questions, not a rhetoric questions here. | |||
| If you want to discuss this from a spiritual perspective and ask where I am personally coming from on this matter, I am happy to do so. | |||
| Thanks. ] 03:21, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Opposition to other major "new religious movements" have been described widely in scholarly books and articles. If as you say there is documented material about opposition to Brahma Kumari since 1930, then find it and add it to the main article. Hope this helps. ] <small>]</small> 03:26, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::I have references, the question remains, what are the likelihood of being able to post them? ] 03:34, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::If you have references, then present these at the talk page. Me or other experienced Wikipedians will assist you there. ] <small>]</small> 05:09, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Hello, | |||
| An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: ]. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, ]. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, ]. | |||
| On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, --] 17:42, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Please let the ArbCom clerk do his duties. You can use the talk page to raise concerns, and edit the section in which you provide your evidence. ] <small>]</small> 03:59, 11 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==I replied to you on my talk page== | |||
| Feel free to drop on by and discuss if you want.] 04:56, 13 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Why screw around with the ToC? == | |||
| "''Why screw around with the ToC''?" | |||
| Because if one does one does not get that big, stupid, useless blank big right eating up half the page in the middle of one's browser when the page loads. | |||
| Is is some new Wiki law not to? Why else was the template made? If it is used at the top then it clashes with the other tags. Placed where it is text flows nicely about it. Simple. | |||
| ] 07:19, 14 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :It doesn't fit in line with all the other articles, and doesn't follow ]. It's there to ''allow'' for specialization, such as on the Main Page. ] (] ° ]) 13:59, 14 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for that link, I had not seen it before and it interests me. I was finding my way in the dark. However, I don't see any direct link to content table but agree that neither style nor intelligence necessarily rules wiki articles ... | |||
| ::I still that think big empty spaces in prime view spots is dumb and ought to be fixed/changed. May be they need to rethink the look placement of content menu ... a scroll down from the top menu would work. ] 17:00, 14 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::The point is to give a brief overview of the contents of the article ''before'' readers are smashed with the content of the article. Placing the ToC and the article content side by side makes readers lose focus. I strongly feel the ToC should be placed as it is placed per default, judging by every other article that's community consensus. ] (] ° ]) 17:16, 14 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Temporary Injunction == | |||
| A temporary injunction has been ] in ]. All editors listed as a party to this case are banned from editing ] until the case is settled. | |||
| For the Arbitration Committee --] 11:28, 18 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Comment regarding post to ]== | |||
| ], I think both sides share the same concern about editors sympathetic to each other's POV. There are some editors roaming around who give me the creeps too! | |||
| I am strongly denying that there is a co-ordinated team of BK ''editors''. The same sort of accustation could be made regarding your website forum members. Please do not persist in stating such accusations as if they were a fact. We're all in this together and I suggest we learn to live with the current injunction. And that's coming from someone who only made precisly one edit to the article ever and is now currently banned from it ;-) Regards ] 09:26, 19 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Merry Christmas and Happy New Year== | |||
| Dear .244, Just a brief note to wish you the best in these holidays and the upcoming new year. As always, best wishes; ] 15:49, 25 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Falling a bit behind on responses== | |||
| Hi ], | |||
| First of all happy new year to you! | |||
| I realise I have a few posts outstanding and fully intend to respond as soon as I can. It's a bit busy for me this week. Hope to get back to you within the next week. | |||
| Cheers ] 07:44, 2 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above. | |||
| ] is banned for one year for a personal attack which contained a threat against another user . 195.82.106.244 is placed on Probation. He may be banned from editing any article which he disrupts by engaging in aggressive biased editing, especially that relying on inadequately sourced original research. ] is placed on article probation. The principals in this matter are expected to convert the article from its present state based on original research and BK publications to an article containing verifiable information based on reliable third party sources. After a suitable grace period, the state of the article may be evaluated on the motion of any member of the Arbitration Committee and further remedies applied to those editors who continue to edit in an inappropriate manner. Any user may request review by members of the Arbitration Committee. Should any user violate a ban imposed under the terms of this decision, they may be blocked for an appropriate period of time. All blocks to be logged at ]. | |||
| For the Arbitration Committee --] 17:31, 12 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==] case== | |||
| {| align="left" | |||
| || ] | |||
| |} | |||
| You have been accused of ]. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ] before editing the evidence page. | |||
| ] 20:07, 10 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:39, 22 February 2023
- THIS PAGE IS WORK IN PROGRESS, FOLLOWING OTHER USERS COMMENT I AM IN THE PROCESS OF REBUILDING WITH THE ENTIRE HISTORY PLEASE ALLOW ME TIME TO DO SO
Blocked
You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of your disruptive edits. You are invited to contribute in a constructive manner as soon as the block expires. // Pilotguy (Cleared to land) 21:26, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Re: Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual University and BK Followers
Message for admins.
There is a BK Follower Riveros11, using various IP in the Tampa Flordia 72.xx.xx.xx range, that is trying any trick in the Wiki book to block any other contributor outside of the BKWSU to the above page.
For the record, I have tried to engage in Discussion, formal Mediation and Arbitration and he has refused to co-join despite being informed. I have also put in a RfC for use of self-published material within the set limitation according to policy. Two admins have agreed that this is inline with policy already.
Rather than engage in discussion, Riveros appears to me to just be intimidating folk off with endless and often erroneous Vandalism accusations, including newcomers. I am going to remove those to give the newcomers an easier ride. I have no fear that I am doing the right think. Help .. don't bite.
195.82.106.244 23:41, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Time to rebuild
It sounds like you are going to restore the whole page- if so, I applaud your choice to do say. It raises your credibility in my eyes and probably others as well. I will peak back in a couple of days. Sethie 02:32, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Hello
I looked over a bit of your request for arbitration. There are many ways to avoid this lengthy, time consuming (on the part of both yourselves and arbitors), process that can sometimes get very ugly.
I'm a member of two (or maybe even three) Seperate WikiProjects that have could perhaps provide assistance. In any case, I'm willing to provide you with assitance.
As a member of a fairly new religious movement myself, I can sympathise with your passion in this matter. I could tell you TONS of stories, but I would rather assist you both in creating the best article you can.
Please leave a message on my talk page, and I can give you both more information about how I can be of assistance.
You're certainly free to do whatever you want, but take it from me - it's much better to perhaps see things in a different light and work towards a common goal than go to arbitration. Sincerely, NinaEliza 04:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- PS: With the current neutrality tag on it, I suggest that few readers are going to give much weight to anything written there, and everyone loses - including the readers. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NinaEliza (talk • contribs) 05:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC).
Whoops! Sorry, forgot to sign.NinaEliza 06:18, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Well heavens, I guess I should have read the talk page before I made my offer. In any case, it still stands. If I can be of service, please let me know.NinaEliza 07:24, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Hello again
I am writing to let you know that I unfortunately need to rescind my offer of personal assistance. Currently, there are great demands on my time - both here and in real life. I encourage you to contact the Mediation Cabal, make a Request for Comment to the general community, or simply seek a Third Opinion. You may also consider posting a message on the noticeboards for various WikiProjects that are appropriate to the topic.
I will reiterate, it is simply best to try to reach consensus with your fellow editors based on the common goal of writing a fair and well-written article. As long as you can at least share this small patch of common ground, there is hope.
Sincerely, NinaEliza 05:03, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Your question
Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/Brahma_Kumaris_Info
Jossi,
that really is not the place for further discussion on this matter Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/Brahma_Kumaris_Info. What the likelihood of it succeeding without further contention? Why does the same principle not apply to pages on the other major "new religious movements"" Why not go engage them?
I am asking honest questions, not a rhetoric questions here.
If you want to discuss this from a spiritual perspective and ask where I am personally coming from on this matter, I am happy to do so.
Thanks. 195.82.106.244 03:21, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Opposition to other major "new religious movements" have been described widely in scholarly books and articles. If as you say there is documented material about opposition to Brahma Kumari since 1930, then find it and add it to the main article. Hope this helps. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 03:26, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- I have references, the question remains, what are the likelihood of being able to post them? 195.82.106.244 03:34, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- If you have references, then present these at the talk page. Me or other experienced Wikipedians will assist you there. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 05:09, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Brahma Kumaris
Hello,
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Brahma Kumaris. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Brahma Kumaris/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Brahma Kumaris/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, --Srikeit 17:42, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Please let the ArbCom clerk do his duties. You can use the talk page to raise concerns, and edit the section in which you provide your evidence. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 03:59, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
I replied to you on my talk page
Feel free to drop on by and discuss if you want.Sethie 04:56, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Why screw around with the ToC?
"Why screw around with the ToC?"
Because if one does one does not get that big, stupid, useless blank big right eating up half the page in the middle of one's browser when the page loads.
Is is some new Wiki law not to? Why else was the template made? If it is used at the top then it clashes with the other tags. Placed where it is text flows nicely about it. Simple.
195.82.106.244 07:19, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- It doesn't fit in line with all the other articles, and doesn't follow Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style. It's there to allow for specialization, such as on the Main Page. Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 13:59, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for that link, I had not seen it before and it interests me. I was finding my way in the dark. However, I don't see any direct link to content table but agree that neither style nor intelligence necessarily rules wiki articles ...
- I still that think big empty spaces in prime view spots is dumb and ought to be fixed/changed. May be they need to rethink the look placement of content menu ... a scroll down from the top menu would work. 195.82.106.244 17:00, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- The point is to give a brief overview of the contents of the article before readers are smashed with the content of the article. Placing the ToC and the article content side by side makes readers lose focus. I strongly feel the ToC should be placed as it is placed per default, judging by every other article that's community consensus. Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 17:16, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Temporary Injunction
A temporary injunction has been passed in Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Brahma Kumaris. All editors listed as a party to this case are banned from editing Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual University until the case is settled.
For the Arbitration Committee --Srikeit 11:28, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Comment regarding post to Srikeit
195.82.106.244, I think both sides share the same concern about editors sympathetic to each other's POV. There are some editors roaming around who give me the creeps too! I am strongly denying that there is a co-ordinated team of BK editors. The same sort of accustation could be made regarding your website forum members. Please do not persist in stating such accusations as if they were a fact. We're all in this together and I suggest we learn to live with the current injunction. And that's coming from someone who only made precisly one edit to the article ever and is now currently banned from it ;-) Regards Bksimonb 09:26, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year
Dear .244, Just a brief note to wish you the best in these holidays and the upcoming new year. As always, best wishes; avyakt7 15:49, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Falling a bit behind on responses
Hi 195.82.106.244, First of all happy new year to you!
I realise I have a few posts outstanding and fully intend to respond as soon as I can. It's a bit busy for me this week. Hope to get back to you within the next week.
Cheers Bksimonb 07:44, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Brahma Kumaris
This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.
195.82.106.244 is banned for one year for a personal attack which contained a threat against another user . 195.82.106.244 is placed on Probation. He may be banned from editing any article which he disrupts by engaging in aggressive biased editing, especially that relying on inadequately sourced original research. Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual University is placed on article probation. The principals in this matter are expected to convert the article from its present state based on original research and BK publications to an article containing verifiable information based on reliable third party sources. After a suitable grace period, the state of the article may be evaluated on the motion of any member of the Arbitration Committee and further remedies applied to those editors who continue to edit in an inappropriate manner. Any user may request review by members of the Arbitration Committee. Should any user violate a ban imposed under the terms of this decision, they may be blocked for an appropriate period of time. All blocks to be logged at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Brahma Kumaris#Log of blocks and bans.
For the Arbitration Committee --Srikeit 17:31, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/195.82.106.244 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.
Bksimonb 20:07, 10 March 2007 (UTC)