Misplaced Pages

Uranium acid mine drainage: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:38, 28 November 2017 editCommonsDelinker (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors1,014,581 edits Removing Dissolved_Uranium_Radionuclides.png, it has been deleted from Commons by Ronhjones because: Copyright violation: external source, no license, no permission..← Previous edit Latest revision as of 20:53, 20 June 2024 edit undoBeland (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators236,628 editsm MOS:FRAC / convert special characters found by Misplaced Pages:Typo Team/moss (via WP:JWB
(45 intermediate revisions by 33 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Uranium acid mine drainage''' refers to ] water released from a ] mining site using processes like underground mining and ].<ref name=":1">{{Cite book|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK201052/|title=Potential Environmental Effects of Uranium Mining, Processing, and Reclamation|last1=Virginia|first1=Committee on Uranium Mining in|last2=Resources|first2=Committee on Earth|last3=Council|first3=National Research|date=2011-12-19|publisher=National Academies Press (US)|language=en}}</ref> Underground, the ores are not as reactive due to isolation from atmospheric ] and water. When uranium ores are mined, the ores are crushed into a powdery substance, thus increasing surface area to easily extract uranium. The ores, along with nearby rocks, may also contain ]. Once exposed to the atmosphere, the powdered tailings react with atmospheric oxygen and water. After uranium extraction, sulfide minerals in uranium tailings facilitates the release of uranium ] into the environment, which can undergo further ] while lowering the ] of a solution.<ref name=":0" />
== Overview ==
]
Uranium Acid Mine Drainage (UAMD) refers to acidic water released from a uranium mining site using processes like underground mining and in-situ leaching.<ref name=":1">{{Cite book|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK201052/|title=Potential Environmental Effects of Uranium Mining, Processing, and Reclamation|last=Virginia|first=Committee on Uranium Mining in|last2=Resources|first2=Committee on Earth|last3=Council|first3=National Research|date=2011-12-19|publisher=National Academies Press (US)|language=en}}</ref> Underground, the ores are not as reactive due to isolation from atmospheric oxygen and water. When uranium ores are mined, the ores as crushed into a powdery substance, thus increasing surface area to easily extract uranium. The ores, along with nearby rocks, may also contain sulfide. Once exposed to the atmosphere, the powdered tailings react with atmospheric oxygen and water. After uranium extraction, sulfide minerals in uranium tailings facilitates the release of uranium radionuclides into the environment which can undergo further radioactive decay while lowering the pH of a solution (Figure 1).<ref name=":0" />
]


== Uranium Chemistry == == Uranium chemistry ==
Naturally, uranium may exist as U<sup>+6</sup> in ores but forms the water soluble uranyl ion UO<sub>2</sub><sup>+2</sup> when uranium tailings are oxidized by atmospheric oxygen in the following reaction.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last=Abdelouas|first=A.|date=2006-12-01|title=Uranium Mill Tailings: Geochemistry, Mineralogy, and Environmental Impact|url=https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/elements/article-lookup/2/6/335|journal=Elements|language=en|volume=2|issue=6|pages=335–341|doi=10.2113/gselements.2.6.335|issn=1811-5209}}</ref> Uranium may exist naturally as U<sup>+6</sup> in ores but also forms the water-soluble ] UO<sub>2</sub><sup>+2</sup> when uranium tailings are oxidized by atmospheric oxygen in the following reaction.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last=Abdelouas|first=A.|date=2006-12-01|title=Uranium Mill Tailings: Geochemistry, Mineralogy, and Environmental Impact|journal=Elements|language=en|volume=2|issue=6|pages=335–341|doi=10.2113/gselements.2.6.335|issn=1811-5209}}</ref>


U<sup>+6</sup> + O<sub>2</sub> → UO<sub>2</sub><sup>+2</sup> :U<sup>+6</sup> + O<sub>2</sub> → UO<sub>2</sub><sup>+2</sup>


The solubility of uranium increases under similar oxidizing conditions when it forms uranyl carbonate complexes in the following reaction.<ref name=":0" /> The ] of uranium increases under similar oxidizing conditions when it forms uranyl carbonate complexes in the following reaction.<ref name=":0" />


U<sup>+6</sup> + O<sub>2</sub> + 2CO<sub>3</sub><sup>2-</sup>→ <sup>2+</sup> :U<sup>+6</sup> + O<sub>2</sub> + 2CO<sub>3</sub><sup>2−</sup>→ <sup>2+</sup>


Extraction of uranium from the ore may occur under acid or alkaline leaching processes using sulfuric acid and sodium carbonate respectively. If leached with sulfuric acid, uranyl forms a soluble uranyl sulfate complex in the following reaction.<ref name=":0" /> Hydrogen ions in solution react with water to produce hydronium ions which lowers a solution's pH making it more acidic. Extraction of uranium from the ore may occur under acid or ] leaching processes using ] and ] respectively. If leached with sulfuric acid, uranyl forms a soluble uranyl sulfate complex in the following reaction.<ref name=":0" /> ] ions in solution react with water to produce ] ions which lowers a solution's pH making it more acidic.


UO<sub>2</sub> + 3H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> + 1/2 O<sub>2</sub> → <sup>4-</sup> + H<sub>2</sub>O + 4H<sup>+</sup> :UO<sub>2</sub> + 3H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> + 1/2 O<sub>2</sub> → <sup>4−</sup> + H<sub>2</sub>O + 4H<sup>+</sup>


H<sup>+</sup><sub>(aq)</sub> + H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>(l)</sub> → H<sub>3</sub>O<sup>+</sup><sub>(aq)</sub> :H<sup>+</sup><sub>(aq)</sub> + H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>(l)</sub> → H<sub>3</sub>O<sup>+</sup><sub>(aq)</sub>


During in-situ leaching, uranyl reacts with iron, a common natural oxidant, to produce uranyl trioxide which is further oxidized then leached using alkaline sodium carbonate in the following reactions.<ref name=":0" /> During in-situ leaching uranyl reacts with ], a common natural ], to produce uranyl trioxide which is further oxidized then leached using alkaline sodium carbonate in the following reactions.<ref name=":0" />


UO<sub>2</sub> + 2Fe<sup>3+</sup> → UO<sub>2</sub><sup>+2</sup> + 2Fe<sup>2+</sup> :UO<sub>2</sub> + 2Fe<sup>3+</sup> → UO<sub>2</sub><sup>+2</sup> + 2Fe<sup>2+</sup>


UO<sub>2</sub> + 1/2 O<sub>2</sub> → UO<sub>3</sub> :UO<sub>2</sub> + 1/2 O<sub>2</sub> → UO<sub>3</sub>


UO<sub>3</sub> + 3Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> + H<sub>2</sub>O → <sup>4+</sup> + 4Na<sup>+</sup> + 2NaOH :UO<sub>3</sub> + 3Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> + H<sub>2</sub>O → <sup>4+</sup> + 4Na<sup>+</sup> + 2NaOH


When considering the formation secondary uranium minerals, as discussed in the case study section below, the pH of the solution that contains ] is one of determining factors of how much of the uranophane is in mineral form or in the form of its ions. Shown in figure 2, from a study performed by Tatiana Shvareva et al. in 2011, is the dissolution of uranophane in pH of 3 (Figure 3b) and pH of 4 (Figure 3a). The graphs demonstrate that in a more acidic environment, the concentrations of ], U, and ] are more likely to be more abundant in more basic environments where it is more likely that they will form minerals.<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal|last1=Shvareva|first1=Tatiana Y.|last2=Mazeina|first2=Lena|last3=Gorman-Lewis|first3=Drew|last4=Burns|first4=Peter C.|last5=Szymanowski|first5=Jennifer E.S.|last6=Fein|first6=Jeremy B.|last7=Navrotsky|first7=Alexandra|title=Thermodynamic characterization of boltwoodite and uranophane: Enthalpy of formation and aqueous solubility|journal=Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta|volume=75|issue=18|pages=5269–5282|doi=10.1016/j.gca.2011.06.041|year=2011|bibcode=2011GeCoA..75.5269S }}</ref> This is more likely to happen when the acidic mine drainage is released into rivers or large water deposits and they become diluted to a pH closer to that of water.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Pereira|first1=Wagner de Souza|last2=Kelecom|first2=Alphonse Germaine Albert Charles|last3=Silva|first3=Ademir Xavier da|last4=Carmo|first4=Alessander Sá do|last5=Júnior|first5=Delcy de Azavedo Py|title=Assessment of uranium release to the environment from a disabled uranium mine in Brazil|journal=Journal of Environmental Radioactivity|volume=188|pages=18–22|doi=10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.11.012|pmid=29153863|year=2018|s2cid=4215263 }}</ref>
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org sandbox}}
When considering the formation secondary uranium minerals, as discussed in the case study section below, pH of the solution that the uranophane is in is one of the determining factors of how much of the uranophane is in mineral form or in the form of its ions. Shown in figure 2, from a study performed by Tatiana Shvareva et al. in 2011, is the dissolution of uranophane, in pH of 3 (Figure 3b) and pH of 4 (Figure 3a). The graphs demonstrate that in a more acidic environment, the concentrations of Ca, U and Si are more likely to be greater than in more basic environments where it is more likely they will form minerals.<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal|last=Shvareva|first=Tatiana Y.|last2=Mazeina|first2=Lena|last3=Gorman-Lewis|first3=Drew|last4=Burns|first4=Peter C.|last5=Szymanowski|first5=Jennifer E.S.|last6=Fein|first6=Jeremy B.|last7=Navrotsky|first7=Alexandra|title=Thermodynamic characterization of boltwoodite and uranophane: Enthalpy of formation and aqueous solubility|url=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.06.041|journal=Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta|volume=75|issue=18|pages=5269–5282|doi=10.1016/j.gca.2011.06.041}}</ref> This is likely to happen when the acidic mine drainage is released into rivers or large water deposits and become diluted to a pH closer to that of water.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Pereira|first=Wagner de Souza|last2=Kelecom|first2=Alphonse Germaine Albert Charles|last3=Silva|first3=Ademir Xavier da|last4=Carmo|first4=Alessander Sá do|last5=Júnior|first5=Delcy de Azavedo Py|title=Assessment of uranium release to the environment from a disabled uranium mine in Brazil|url=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.11.012|journal=Journal of Environmental Radioactivity|doi=10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.11.012}}</ref>


The Enthalpies of formation (from elements and from oxide species) and Gibbs free energies of formation (from elements) of the uranium minerals boltwoodite, Na-boltwoodite, and uranophane are shown in Table 1. Solubility constants (dissociation of minerals to ions) of the same minerals, determined using a bomb calorimeter in a study by Shvareva, Tatiana et al. in 2011, are shown in Table 2. The Gibbs free energies of formation show that the process, when the reactions from the individual elements to the oxides are taken into account, is Spontaneous. The enthalpies of formation, when only considering the reaction from the oxides to the mineral, suggest a relatively high probability for their Gibbs free energy of formation values to also be spontaneous. <ref name=":3" /> The ] (from elements and from oxide species) and ] of formation (from elements) of the uranium minerals ], Na-boltwoodite, and uranophane are shown in Table 1. Solubility constants (dissociation of minerals to ions) of the same minerals, determined using a ] in a study by Shvareva, Tatiana et al. in 2011, are shown in Table 2. The Gibbs free energies of formation show that the process, when the reactions from the individual elements to the oxides are taken into account, is spontaneous. The enthalpies of formation, when only considering the reaction from the oxides to the mineral, suggest a relatively high probability for their Gibbs free energy of formation values to also be spontaneous.<ref name=":3" />


{| class="wikitable" {| class="wikitable"
! !
!ΔH<sub>f, ox</sub> (kJ/mol) !Δ<sub>f, ox</sub>''H'' (kJ/mol)
!ΔH<sub>f, el</sub> (kJ/mol) !Δ<sub>f, el</sub>''H'' (kJ/mol)
!ΔG<sub>f, el</sub> (kJ/mol) !Δ<sub>f, el</sub>''G'' (kJ/mol)
|- |-
|Boltwoodite: K(UO<sub>2</sub>)(HSiO<sub>4</sub>):HO |Boltwoodite: K(UO<sub>2</sub>)(HSiO<sub>4</sub>):HO
Line 47: Line 45:
|<nowiki>-2725.2 ± 2.6</nowiki> |<nowiki>-2725.2 ± 2.6</nowiki>
|- |-
|Uranophane: ½ |Uranophane: {{sfrac|1|2}}
|<nowiki>-161.1 ± 5.4</nowiki> |<nowiki>-161.1 ± 5.4</nowiki>
|<nowiki>-3399.5 ± 5.8</nowiki> |<nowiki>-3399.5 ± 5.8</nowiki>
Line 60: Line 58:
|Boltwoodite: K(UO<sub>2</sub>)(HSiO<sub>4</sub>):H<sub>2</sub>O |Boltwoodite: K(UO<sub>2</sub>)(HSiO<sub>4</sub>):H<sub>2</sub>O
|4.12 (-0.48/+0.30) |4.12 (-0.48/+0.30)
|K<sub>sp</sub> =  <math>\frac{}{}</math> |K<sub>sp</sub> = <math>\frac{ }{}</math>
|- |-
|Na-boltwoodite: Na(UO<sub>2</sub>)(HSiO<sub>4</sub>):H<sub>2</sub>O |Na-boltwoodite: Na(UO<sub>2</sub>)(HSiO<sub>4</sub>):H<sub>2</sub>O
|6.07 (-0.16/+0.26) |6.07 (-0.16/+0.26)
|K<sub>sp</sub> = <math>\frac{}{}</math> |K<sub>sp</sub> = <math>\frac{ }{}</math>
|- |-
|Uranophane: ½ |Uranophane: {{sfrac|1|2}}
|10.82 (-0.62/+0.29) |10.82 (-0.62/+0.29)
|K<sub>sp</sub> = <math>\frac{}{}</math> |K<sub>sp</sub> = <math>\frac{ }{}</math>
|} |}
Table 2. Solubility constants and mass action equations for boltwoodite, Na-boltwoodite, and uranophane.<ref name=":3" /> Table 2. Solubility constants and mass action equations for boltwoodite, Na-boltwoodite, and uranophane.<ref name=":3" />


== Uranium acid mine drainage case study ==
== UAMD Case Study ==
Two uranium mines in northern Portugal, Quinta do Bispo and Cunha Baixa, have been inactive since 1991. Acidic water is pumped out of the mines for neutralization and precipitation of radionuclides using calcium hydroxide.<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal|last=P.|first=Carvalho, Fernando|last2=M.|first2=Oliveira, João|last3=Isabel|first3=Faria,|title=Alpha Emitting Radionuclides in Drainage from Quinta do Bispo and Cunha Baixa Uranium Mines (Portugal) and Associated Radiotoxicological Risk|url=http://www.academia.edu/23840840/Alpha_Emitting_Radionuclides_in_Drainage_from_Quinta_do_Bispo_and_Cunha_Baixa_Uranium_Mines_Portugal_and_Associated_Radiotoxicological_Risk|journal=Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology|language=en|volume=83|issue=5|issn=0007-4861}}</ref> Studies in 2002 found that there were high concentrations of soluble and suspended uranium radionuclides in river water samples near the mines.<ref name=":2" /> Castelo river reached suspended uranium isotope concentrations of -72 kBq/kg which is roughly 170x higher than normal concentrations in the Mondego River but returned back to normal after 7 km.<ref name=":2" /> The mine waters of Quinta do Bispo and Cunha Baixa had low pH values at 2.67 and 3.48 with U-238 concentrations of 92,000 mBq/L and 2,200 mBq/L, respectively.<ref name=":2" /> Two uranium mines in northern ], Quinta do Bispo and ], have been inactive since 1991. Acidic water is pumped out of the mines for neutralization and precipitation of radionuclides using ].<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal|last1=P.|first1=Carvalho, Fernando|last2=M.|first2=Oliveira, João|last3=Isabel|first3=Faria|title=Alpha Emitting Radionuclides in Drainage from Quinta do Bispo and Cunha Baixa Uranium Mines (Portugal) and Associated Radiotoxicological Risk|url=https://www.academia.edu/23840840|journal=Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology|language=en|volume=83|issue=5|pages=668–673|issn=0007-4861|doi=10.1007/s00128-009-9808-3|pmid=19590808|year=2009|s2cid=38648832 }}</ref> Studies in 2002 found that there were high concentrations of soluble and suspended uranium radionuclides in river water samples near the mines.<ref name=":2" /> Castelo river reached suspended uranium isotope concentrations of -72 ]/kg which is roughly 170x higher than normal concentrations in the ] but returned to normal after 7&nbsp;km.<ref name=":2" /> The mine waters of Quinta do Bispo and Cunha Baixa had low pH values at 2.67 and 3.48 with ] concentrations of 92,000 mBq/L and 2,200 mBq/L, respectively.<ref name=":2" />


Results from studies done in 2002 showed a significant negative correlation between both dissolved uranium radionuclides and hydrogen ions with pH in mine waters.<ref name=":2" /> Sorption of dissolved uranium radionuclides in rivers combine with nearby rock sediments can form minerals like uranophane.<ref name=":2" /> The chemistry and findings in this case is essentially representative of other uranium mines in the world.

== Uranium radionuclides in the environment ==
A uranium radionuclide is a radioactive isotope. Radioactivity is natural in the environment, however uranium radionuclides can lead to radioactive decay. In the case of uranium mines, these radionuclides can leach into the water and cause the radioactivity to be carried elsewhere, as well as form precipitates that can be harmful to the environment. The uranium radionuclides can eventually be carried to ] and ] via contaminated waters. Sulfuric acid, oxidation, and alkaline leaching are processes of how radionuclides make their way into the environment. When uranium decays it also produces the isotopes ] and ], which may be environmentally harmful due to the fact that ] is present as an inert gas and therefore, might enter into the soil or atmosphere. Radon then can emit ] and ].<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Mir|first1=Feroz A.|last2=Rather|first2=Sajad A.|date=2015-04-01|title=Measurement of radioactive nuclides present in soil samples of district Ganderbal of Kashmir Province for radiation safety purposes|journal=Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences|volume=8|issue=2|pages=155–159|doi=10.1016/j.jrras.2014.03.006|doi-access=free}}</ref> The three different radioactive isotopes of uranium are uranium-238, ], and ]. Each has a different ] which determines the isotope's decay rate.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://ataridogdaze.com/science/uranium-decay-rate.html|title=Calculation of Radioactive Decay Rate of 1.00 gram of Natural Uranium in kBq|last=Chang|first=Gray|website=ataridogdaze.com|access-date=2017-11-28}}</ref> When uranium-235 combines with other molecules it creates a chemical reaction that can cause detrimental effects to water. Even though isotope formation occurs naturally, when combined with other elements it can cause the pH of water to become more acidic as discussed previously.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Carvalho|first1=Fernando P.|last2=Oliveira|first2=João M.|last3=Faria|first3=Isabel|date=November 2009|title=Alpha emitting radionuclides in drainage from Quinta do Bispo and Cunha Baixa uranium mines (Portugal) and associated radiotoxicological risk|journal=Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology|volume=83|issue=5|pages=668–673|doi=10.1007/s00128-009-9808-3|issn=1432-0800|pmid=19590808|s2cid=38648832 }}</ref>


Results from studies done in 2002 showed a significant negative correlation between both dissolved uranium radionuclides and hydrogen ions with pH in mine waters (Figure 4).<ref name=":2" /> Sorption of dissolved uranium radionuclides in rivers combine with nearby rock sediments can form minerals like ] for example.<ref name=":2" /> The chemistry and findings in this case is essentially representative of other uranium mines in the world.
= <small>Uranium Radionuclides in the Environment</small> =
A uranium radionuclide is a radioactive isotope. Radioactivity is natural in the environment, however uranium radionuclides can lead to radioactive decay.In the case of uranium mines, these radionuclides can leach into the water and cause the radioactivity to be carried elsewhere, as well as form precipitates that can be harmful to the environment. The uranium radionuclides can eventually be carried to fruits and vegetables via contaminated waters. ], oxidation, and alkaline leaching are processes of how radionuclides make their way into the environment. When uranium decays it also produces the isotopes <sup>226</sup>Ra and <sup>222</sup>Rn, which may be environmentally harmful.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Mir|first=Feroz A.|last2=Rather|first2=Sajad A.|date=2015-04-01|title=Measurement of radioactive nuclides present in soil samples of district Ganderbal of Kashmir Province for radiation safety purposes|url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687850714000351|journal=Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences|volume=8|issue=2|pages=155–159|doi=10.1016/j.jrras.2014.03.006}}</ref> Three different radioactive isotopes of uranium are ], ], and ]. Each has a different half life which determines the isotope's decay rate.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://ataridogdaze.com/science/uranium-decay-rate.html|title=Calculation of Radioactive Decay Rate of 1.00 gram of Natural Uranium in kBq|last=Chang|first=Gray|website=ataridogdaze.com|access-date=2017-11-28}}</ref> When uranium-235 combines with other molecules it creates a chemical reaction that can cause detrimental effects to water. Even though isotope formation occurs naturally, when combined with other elements it can cause the pH of water to become more acidic as discussed previously. <ref>{{Cite journal|last=Carvalho|first=Fernando P.|last2=Oliveira|first2=João M.|last3=Faria|first3=Isabel|date=November 2009|title=Alpha emitting radionuclides in drainage from Quinta do Bispo and Cunha Baixa uranium mines (Portugal) and associated radiotoxicological risk|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19590808|journal=Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology|volume=83|issue=5|pages=668–673|doi=10.1007/s00128-009-9808-3|issn=1432-0800|pmid=19590808}}</ref>
== References == == References ==
<references />

]
]

Latest revision as of 20:53, 20 June 2024

Uranium acid mine drainage refers to acidic water released from a uranium mining site using processes like underground mining and in-situ leaching. Underground, the ores are not as reactive due to isolation from atmospheric oxygen and water. When uranium ores are mined, the ores are crushed into a powdery substance, thus increasing surface area to easily extract uranium. The ores, along with nearby rocks, may also contain sulfides. Once exposed to the atmosphere, the powdered tailings react with atmospheric oxygen and water. After uranium extraction, sulfide minerals in uranium tailings facilitates the release of uranium radionuclides into the environment, which can undergo further radioactive decay while lowering the pH of a solution.

Uranium-238 Decay Chain

Uranium chemistry

Uranium may exist naturally as U in ores but also forms the water-soluble uranyl ion UO2 when uranium tailings are oxidized by atmospheric oxygen in the following reaction.

U + O2 → UO2

The solubility of uranium increases under similar oxidizing conditions when it forms uranyl carbonate complexes in the following reaction.

U + O2 + 2CO3

Extraction of uranium from the ore may occur under acid or alkaline leaching processes using sulfuric acid and sodium carbonate respectively. If leached with sulfuric acid, uranyl forms a soluble uranyl sulfate complex in the following reaction. Hydrogen ions in solution react with water to produce hydronium ions which lowers a solution's pH making it more acidic.

UO2 + 3H2SO4 + 1/2 O2 → + H2O + 4H
H(aq) + H2O(l) → H3O(aq)

During in-situ leaching uranyl reacts with iron, a common natural oxidant, to produce uranyl trioxide which is further oxidized then leached using alkaline sodium carbonate in the following reactions.

UO2 + 2Fe → UO2 + 2Fe
UO2 + 1/2 O2 → UO3
UO3 + 3Na2CO3 + H2O → + 4Na + 2NaOH

When considering the formation secondary uranium minerals, as discussed in the case study section below, the pH of the solution that contains uranophane is one of determining factors of how much of the uranophane is in mineral form or in the form of its ions. Shown in figure 2, from a study performed by Tatiana Shvareva et al. in 2011, is the dissolution of uranophane in pH of 3 (Figure 3b) and pH of 4 (Figure 3a). The graphs demonstrate that in a more acidic environment, the concentrations of Ca, U, and Si are more likely to be more abundant in more basic environments where it is more likely that they will form minerals. This is more likely to happen when the acidic mine drainage is released into rivers or large water deposits and they become diluted to a pH closer to that of water.

The enthalpies of formation (from elements and from oxide species) and Gibbs free energies of formation (from elements) of the uranium minerals boltwoodite, Na-boltwoodite, and uranophane are shown in Table 1. Solubility constants (dissociation of minerals to ions) of the same minerals, determined using a bomb calorimeter in a study by Shvareva, Tatiana et al. in 2011, are shown in Table 2. The Gibbs free energies of formation show that the process, when the reactions from the individual elements to the oxides are taken into account, is spontaneous. The enthalpies of formation, when only considering the reaction from the oxides to the mineral, suggest a relatively high probability for their Gibbs free energy of formation values to also be spontaneous.

Δf, oxH (kJ/mol) Δf, elH (kJ/mol) Δf, elG (kJ/mol)
Boltwoodite: K(UO2)(HSiO4):HO -251.2 ± 5.9 -2766.8 ± 6.5 -2758.6 ± 3.5
Na-boltwoodite: Na(UO2)(HSiO4):H2O -215.8 ± 6.0 -2948.8 ± 6.6 -2725.2 ± 2.6
Uranophane: ⁠1/2⁠ -161.1 ± 5.4 -3399.5 ± 5.8 -3099.3 ± 5.6

Table 1. The enthalpy of formation (from oxide to mineral), enthalpy of formation (from individual elements to mineral), and Gibbs free energy (from individual elements to mineral) of boltwoodite, Na-boltwoodite, and uranophane.

log Ksp ± 2σ Mass action equations
Boltwoodite: K(UO2)(HSiO4):H2O 4.12 (-0.48/+0.30) Ksp = [ α K + ] [ α U O 2 2 + ] [ α H 2 S O 4 ] [ α H + ] {\displaystyle {\frac {}{}}}
Na-boltwoodite: Na(UO2)(HSiO4):H2O 6.07 (-0.16/+0.26) Ksp = [ α N a + ] [ α U O 2 2 + ] [ α H 2 S 0 4 ] [ α H + ] {\displaystyle {\frac {}{}}}
Uranophane: ⁠1/2⁠ 10.82 (-0.62/+0.29) Ksp = [ α C a 2 + ] [ α U O 2 2 + ] [ α H 2 S O 4 ] [ α H + ] {\displaystyle {\frac {}{}}}

Table 2. Solubility constants and mass action equations for boltwoodite, Na-boltwoodite, and uranophane.

Uranium acid mine drainage case study

Two uranium mines in northern Portugal, Quinta do Bispo and Cunha Baixa, have been inactive since 1991. Acidic water is pumped out of the mines for neutralization and precipitation of radionuclides using calcium hydroxide. Studies in 2002 found that there were high concentrations of soluble and suspended uranium radionuclides in river water samples near the mines. Castelo river reached suspended uranium isotope concentrations of -72 kBq/kg which is roughly 170x higher than normal concentrations in the Mondego River but returned to normal after 7 km. The mine waters of Quinta do Bispo and Cunha Baixa had low pH values at 2.67 and 3.48 with U-238 concentrations of 92,000 mBq/L and 2,200 mBq/L, respectively.

Results from studies done in 2002 showed a significant negative correlation between both dissolved uranium radionuclides and hydrogen ions with pH in mine waters. Sorption of dissolved uranium radionuclides in rivers combine with nearby rock sediments can form minerals like uranophane. The chemistry and findings in this case is essentially representative of other uranium mines in the world.

Uranium radionuclides in the environment

A uranium radionuclide is a radioactive isotope. Radioactivity is natural in the environment, however uranium radionuclides can lead to radioactive decay. In the case of uranium mines, these radionuclides can leach into the water and cause the radioactivity to be carried elsewhere, as well as form precipitates that can be harmful to the environment. The uranium radionuclides can eventually be carried to fruits and vegetables via contaminated waters. Sulfuric acid, oxidation, and alkaline leaching are processes of how radionuclides make their way into the environment. When uranium decays it also produces the isotopes Ra and Rn, which may be environmentally harmful due to the fact that radon is present as an inert gas and therefore, might enter into the soil or atmosphere. Radon then can emit alpha particles and gamma radiation. The three different radioactive isotopes of uranium are uranium-238, uranium-235, and uranium-234. Each has a different half-life which determines the isotope's decay rate. When uranium-235 combines with other molecules it creates a chemical reaction that can cause detrimental effects to water. Even though isotope formation occurs naturally, when combined with other elements it can cause the pH of water to become more acidic as discussed previously.

References

  1. Virginia, Committee on Uranium Mining in; Resources, Committee on Earth; Council, National Research (2011-12-19). Potential Environmental Effects of Uranium Mining, Processing, and Reclamation. National Academies Press (US).
  2. ^ Abdelouas, A. (2006-12-01). "Uranium Mill Tailings: Geochemistry, Mineralogy, and Environmental Impact". Elements. 2 (6): 335–341. doi:10.2113/gselements.2.6.335. ISSN 1811-5209.
  3. ^ Shvareva, Tatiana Y.; Mazeina, Lena; Gorman-Lewis, Drew; Burns, Peter C.; Szymanowski, Jennifer E.S.; Fein, Jeremy B.; Navrotsky, Alexandra (2011). "Thermodynamic characterization of boltwoodite and uranophane: Enthalpy of formation and aqueous solubility". Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 75 (18): 5269–5282. Bibcode:2011GeCoA..75.5269S. doi:10.1016/j.gca.2011.06.041.
  4. Pereira, Wagner de Souza; Kelecom, Alphonse Germaine Albert Charles; Silva, Ademir Xavier da; Carmo, Alessander Sá do; Júnior, Delcy de Azavedo Py (2018). "Assessment of uranium release to the environment from a disabled uranium mine in Brazil". Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 188: 18–22. doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.11.012. PMID 29153863. S2CID 4215263.
  5. ^ P., Carvalho, Fernando; M., Oliveira, João; Isabel, Faria (2009). "Alpha Emitting Radionuclides in Drainage from Quinta do Bispo and Cunha Baixa Uranium Mines (Portugal) and Associated Radiotoxicological Risk". Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 83 (5): 668–673. doi:10.1007/s00128-009-9808-3. ISSN 0007-4861. PMID 19590808. S2CID 38648832.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  6. Mir, Feroz A.; Rather, Sajad A. (2015-04-01). "Measurement of radioactive nuclides present in soil samples of district Ganderbal of Kashmir Province for radiation safety purposes". Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences. 8 (2): 155–159. doi:10.1016/j.jrras.2014.03.006.
  7. Chang, Gray. "Calculation of Radioactive Decay Rate of 1.00 gram of Natural Uranium in kBq". ataridogdaze.com. Retrieved 2017-11-28.
  8. Carvalho, Fernando P.; Oliveira, João M.; Faria, Isabel (November 2009). "Alpha emitting radionuclides in drainage from Quinta do Bispo and Cunha Baixa uranium mines (Portugal) and associated radiotoxicological risk". Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 83 (5): 668–673. doi:10.1007/s00128-009-9808-3. ISSN 1432-0800. PMID 19590808. S2CID 38648832.
Categories: