Misplaced Pages

Talk:Azerbaijanis: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:26, 15 October 2006 editLing.Nut (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers34,803 editsm ethnic groups class = FA← Previous edit Latest revision as of 13:01, 27 December 2024 edit undoBeshogur (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users33,173 edits Azerbaijani population: ReplyTag: Reply 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header|search=yes}}
{{featured}}
{{controversial}}
{{Mainpage date|August 6|2006}}
{{ArticleHistory
{{V0.5|class=FA|category=Socsci}}
|action1=FAC
{{WikiProject Azerbaijan}}
|action1date=14:08, 27 June 2006
{{WikiProject Iran}}
|action1link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Azerbaijani people
{{Ethnic groups|class=FA}}
|action1result=promoted
{| class="infobox" width="270px"
|action1oldid=60823970
|-
!align="center" colspan="2"|]<br>]
----
|-
|
*]
*]
*]
*]
*
*
*
|}<!--Template:Archivebox-->


|action2=FAR
== Women Section ==
|action2date=14:12, 23 May 2012
|action2link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/Azerbaijani people/archive1
|action2result=removed
|action2oldid=493649640


|maindate=August 6, 2006
Not that I disagree with any of the sentiment expressed, but the Women section is not NPOV in its language, UberIcarus
|dykentry=...that ''']''' live in ], ], ], ] and the ], as well as ]?
|dykdate=4 June 2004
|currentstatus=FFA
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=
{{WikiProject Azerbaijan|importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Ethnic groups|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Iran |importance=top}}
}}
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|topic=a-a|style=long}}


{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
* I think that I've found an error in this section. It says "The Republic of Azerbaijan is also one of the few Muslim countries where abortion is available on demand."
|target= Talk:Azerbaijanis/Archive index
But the reference is pointing here: http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:AbortionLawsAroundtheWorld.png ... an image; and I've searched, and the article that should point is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/Abortion_law
|mask= Talk:Azerbaijanis/Archive <#>
|leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes |template=
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{aan}}
|maxarchivesize = 100K
|counter = 14
|minthreadsleft = 5
|algo = old(90d)
|archive = Talk:Azerbaijanis/Archive %(counter)d
}}


== Suggesting a change on history category. ==
If this is true, can someone change it. (Sorry about the english)


I’m suggesting a change and almost a total rewrite of the history category. When you read the history category you quickly realise this isn’t talking about the history of the Azerbaijanis but the history of the land of modern day Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan already has its own Misplaced Pages page where the history of the land is mentioned so also mentioning it in this page which is talking about the Azerbaijani ethnicity is wrong because the Turks of Azerbaijan didn’t enter the area until the 700-1000s. For example example mentioning the atabegs of Azerbaijan, Seljuks, the qizilbash and the role of Azerbaijanis in the Safavid, afsharid, and qajar empires would make much more sense then mentioning what people lived in the lands before, this is after all a Misplaced Pages page about the Azerbaijanis. ] (]) 14:02, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
== Encylopaedia of Islam... ==
:For the record, Altynordu has been indefinitely blocked as ]. ] (]) 22:32, 12 January 2024 (UTC)


== Infobox and ]? ==
Just a little correction, based on the ENGLISH version of this encyclopaedia, in the word ADHARBAYJAN, "DH" means "Z" (according to the pronunciation), since it has been translated from ARABIC to ENGLISH, so by reffering to the original Arabic versions of encyclopaedias - old and new - the word will be آذربايجان EN: Azær ba i jan.


I believe @] and @] can discuss the matter here. I guess the main argument of Beshogur is that the infobox can give undue weight to minority opinions, when separately mentioned. A middleway I can come up with is to revise how the sources are presented there so that there is no undue attention given. ] (]) 22:24, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
**Well I don't think that "Ayatollah Khamenei" is an ethnic azeri, he was born in the city of mashhad, north-eastern Iran, his mom was persian, his DAD was a half azeri living in "Najaf" IRAQ, so he doesn't know anything about azeri culture, I would say he is a persian since he speaks persian not turkish! he is just 25% azeri with no azeri education.


:There is no such thing as "undue weight" here, please read the ] carefully, i quote from it :
::: Actually his dad is Azarbaijani and has trouble speaking Persian. Ayatollah Khamenei is related to Shaykh Mahmud Khiyabani. As per his mom I am not sure but I am pretty sure she is an Azerbaijani as well. As for being born in Mash-had that is true, but many Azarbaijanis are born in Tehran as well. So just because they are born in a non-Azerbaijani speaking environment, it does not make them non-Azerbaijani. Also Khaemeni speaks Azerbaijani and Turkish well and whenever Erbakan or Aliyev have visited, he didn't need a translator. --] 01:42, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
:"If a viewpoint is in the majority, then it should be easy to substantiate it with reference to commonly accepted reference texts;
:'''If a viewpoint is held by a significant minority, then it should be easy to name prominent adherents''';
:If a viewpoint is held by an extremely small (or vastly limited) minority, it does not belong in Misplaced Pages (except perhaps in some ancillary article) regardless of whether it is true or not; and regardless of whether you can prove it or not.
:Views held only by a tiny minority of people should not be represented as significant minority views, and perhaps should not be represented at all."
:here we have a viewpoint held by not only a significant minority but also by prominent experts of this topic.
:In addition to Arakelova, let me quote Rasmus Christian Elling (another prominent expert of this topic) : "'''The number of Azeris in Iran is heavily disputed'''. In 2005, '''Amanolahi estimated all Turkic-speaking communities in Iran to number no more than 9 million'''. CIA and Library of congress estimates range from 16 to 24 percent—that is, 12–18 million people if we employ the latest total figure for Iran's population (77.8 million). Azeri ethnicsts, on the other hand, argue that overall number is much higher, even as much as 50 percent or more of the total population. '''Such inflated estimates may have influenced some Western scholars who suggest that up to 30 percent (that is, some 23 million today)''' Iranians are Azeris" thus, this viewpoint is all but held by an extremely small minority (like people supporting flat Earth for example, as said in our guideline). Content is well-sourced and should be restored as per ]. Best.<b><span style="color:orange">---Wikaviani </span></b><sup><small><b>] ]</b></small></sup> 23:45, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
::I am not going to dive into the discussion, but I have restored the figure in the infobox as I did not realize it was removed several months ago. ] (]) 00:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
:::Ok, thanks.<b><span style="color:orange">---Wikaviani </span></b><sup><small><b>] ]</b></small></sup> 02:17, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
::In 2005, Iran's population was 70 million, and 82 million in 2015. Claiming they're 6 million in 2020 is a fringe view, and does not match other views, thus it is undue. I'd rather take CIA world factbook than Yerevan state university professor. ] (]) 10:53, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
:::Is that your sole argument ? seriously ? Iran had a population of 70 million in 2005 and 84 million in 2020, an increase of 20%, so there are 7,2 millions Azeris in Iran in 2020, so what ? that makes sources like Arakelova or Elling "fringe view" ? come on. As to the CIA, the Elling source is from it.<b><span style="color:orange">---Wikaviani </span></b><sup><small><b>] ]</b></small></sup> 16:54, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
::::All those listed sources are more than decade old and they give a number above 10 million. Which makes Arakelova's numbers fringe. ] (]) 00:58, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::Arakelova is not the only reliable source that gives lower figures, Elling gives comparable figures too, anyway, it's a reliable source and it has to remain in the article as per ].<b><span style="color:orange">---Wikaviani </span></b><sup><small><b>] ]</b></small></sup> 02:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
::::::Am I missing the other sources giving lower figures? ] (]) 11:37, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::::As i said above, Elling gives a figure lower than 9 million (in 2005) for '''all Turkic speakers of Iran''' so Azerbaijanis alone would be lesser than 8 million in 2005, with a 20% increase, that would mean that there are about 9,5 million (maximum) today.<b><span style="color:orange">---Wikaviani </span></b><sup><small><b>] ]</b></small></sup> 13:51, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
::::::::8 million is over 11% in 2005. Arakelova's 2020 numbers equals to 7% of 2020 Iranian population, which is mathematically impossible. ] (]) 15:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::Well, Arakelova's estimate represents between 7 and 8% of the current Iranian population, while Elling's 9,5 millions estimate is around 11%, wow, what a big deal, both are well below the other fanciful estimates (some Azerbaijanis ethnicists claim over 50% of Iranian population ...).<b><span style="color:orange">---Wikaviani </span></b><sup><small><b>] ]</b></small></sup> 20:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::No you're showing the lowest estimates. Even {{tq|Elling's 9,5 millions estimate is around 11%}} is 3-4% further from Arakelova. While most sources claim +- 20%. ] (]) 20:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::Don't know what you're talking about, you asked me the other source with comparable figures with that of Arakelova, that source is Elling and 3 - 4 % difference is not a big deal, given that there is no official census for the ethnic groups of Iran. In Addition to that, Arakelova is the most recent source of the list, many of the others are at least 10 years old, they should probably be removed as they are almost oudated for such a topic.<b><span style="color:orange">---Wikaviani </span></b><sup><small><b>] ]</b></small></sup> 10:20, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::::I am saying Elling's 3-4% difference is closest what we have to Arakelova. That's now even remotely close, plus that's the lowest we have. {{tq|many of the others are at least 10 years old, they should probably be removed as they are almost oudated for such a topic}} Just because Yerevan State University professor says so, we should not remove a source because it is 10 years old. These sources are 10 years old, yet mentions double the Yerevan State University professor's numbers. ] (]) 14:32, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::::Because Arakelova is ''Yerevan state University professor'' that source should be removed ? I'm sorry, but i'm not enclined to accept that. As i said, there are no official census for ethnic groups living in Iran, thus, sources give many estimates, they should be cited in order to keep a ]. Yet, Arakelova's estimate is not so far away that of Elling.<b><span style="color:orange">---Wikaviani </span></b><sup><small><b>] ]</b></small></sup> 18:57, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::::::This discussion does not appear to be getting anywhere as both parties are not nearing any consensus. But I believe Wikaviani makes a good point about sources' age. In order to solve the disagreement, we can instead use sources from the last 5 years in the infobox, so that the question isn't about Arakelova and older sources. Arakelova is already cited throughout the article, so the infobox is not the only place it is found in, and its total removal is a completely different issue that should be separately discussed. Several sources from the last 5 years I found, , , , , , , . What are both of your opinions on this? ] (]) 19:18, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::::::Previously, I mentioned my concerns about her bias. You can check her personal vk.com account. But I want this being removed because it does not match other numbers, I don't care about Yerevan State University, whatsoever. ] (]) 20:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
{{od}}
I would go with Aintabili's proposal, old sources removed, Arakelova's figure kept in, more recent sources added instead of the old ones. I don't read Russian and i don't trust Russian sites either, thus, i don't care about vk.com.<b><span style="color:orange">---Wikaviani </span></b><sup><small><b>] ]</b></small></sup> 09:00, 17 January 2024 (UTC)


:My proposal involves the removal of Arakelova's figure (which is from 2015) from the infobox as only sources from the last 5 years will be used (hence, partially solving the disagreement), but the figure and her opinions will stay within the article. Would you still agree? ] (]) 15:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
:::: The spelling of the EI is correct. The Arabic "ذ" is pronounced like "dh", comparable to the English "th". Because Persians cannot prnounce these kinds of sounced, it turned "Azerbaijan". Later, the Turks simply copied from Persian. It should be noted that the name "Azerbaijan" is the ARABIC version of the original Median "Azerpadegan".
::I don't get well why we should chose that threshold of "5 years", i mentioned above the 10+ years old sources. Also, Arakelova is cited in the Iranian Azerbaijanis article.<b><span style="color:orange">---Wikaviani </span></b><sup><small><b>] ]</b></small></sup> 08:29, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
:::: As for Khomeini, it is absolutely no secret that he and his family were from India. That's why he always signed his letters with "al-Hindi". The question remains whether his family had setteled in Iran much earlier, or that he himself was an Indian Muslim. Some language experts and reporters (I have no time to google their names right now) maintain that Khomeini was not able to speak correct Persian except for some 100 common words. That's why most of his speeches were written by others and he always refused to give spontanious interviews. ] 10:32, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
:::This was a compromise I thought could be acceptable to both of you. Beshogur wants Arakelova to be wholly removed, but it merits an independent discussion, and the particular locus of the dispute was the infobox. And you've pointed out the age of the other sources. The purpose here is to address both of your points. (I'm underlining that this doesn't involve the total removal of Arakelova.) Choosing sources from the last 5 years isn't particularly different from using 10 years as the threshold. ] (]) 15:18, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
::::: Oh, my mistake ... you're talking about Khamenei ... lol ...OK, he is deffinitly Azari. :) ] 10:32, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
I don't find Arakelova's numbers to be compelling. And the range of 6 to 23 million is impossible. Most sources provide the numbers of around 15-20 million. For example, Britannica provides the figure of 15 million for Iranian Azerbaijanis at the turn of 21st century, and that number is dated. It should certainly rise in the last 20 years. You can see even from the infobox how many sources provide higher estimates against a single low estimate by Arakelova. It is better to stick to the range that the majority of sources provide. ]] 17:04, 19 January 2024 (UTC)


:Britannica is , you should know that better than me since you have been editing here for about 18 years. A far better source than Britannica (Elling/Amanolahi) estimated all Turkic-speaking communities in Iran to number no more than 9 million (in 2005) that would mean that the number of Azerbaijanis in Iran was barely half of what Britannica says while that figure was given 5 years after the turn of 21st century ... I'm sorry, but the fact that Beshogur doesn't want Arakelova's source is not enough for me, that source is one of the best sources we have for this topic and should be cited, just like in the Iranian Azerbaijanis' article for the figures of that ethnic group in Iran. You guys are only making some ] based on weaker sources, like Britannica or others.<b><span style="color:orange">---Wikaviani </span></b><sup><small><b>] ]</b></small></sup> 18:01, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Ok, this is the thing, we say that khomeini has an indian background, that doesn't mean that he is an indian which he wasn't. he was mostly iranian, and about khamenei, he has a turkish background from his father side, but he wasn't even born in azerbaijan, i mean he rathers to speak farsi, if he is a turk, so even if we say he is a turk, me as a turk don't know him as a turk coz he hates turks, if he was a real turk, he wouldn't at least forget his own language, so what was his real first language? No persian teaches his or her child turkish, but some turks do teach their kids persian, and the kids are not turks anymore, this is the problem, i mean we have nothing to do with farsi, we like it as it is, but it shouldn't be in a way so every single turk becomes a persian...in that case turks won't accept it as before, coz they know anyways they are turks, like a persian knows his/her background, and names, i would say let's not talk about "azerbaijan" since the islamic culture affected these lands alot, azerbaijan has been written in arabic that way cause that was the best way of writing with an advanced alphabet at that time, the same thing happened to other names, and for your info: azerbaijan is more turkish that any other name, they kept the name as they did their language, if you knew turkish you wouldn't make similarities between that and "padegan", and for more info: have a look at khazar, and ask turkmens what they still call azerbaijan! and you know medians were not persians right? pure aryans? No. .. azerbaijan and cacasia was full of people when aryans were not even close to persia, "persia" is only respectable for persians,but persians are respectable for us, persians belong to persian lands, turks to turkish lands, and so...being a persian or turk has nothing to do with cyrus or babak or khamenei or hitler or gandi, everyone watns to be something neither me or you can change it.
::Could you address my comment above? ] (]) 18:30, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
:::Please read what i said, i addressed it : "''' I'm sorry, but the fact that Beshogur doesn't want Arakelova's source is not enough for me, that source is one of the best sources we have for this topic and should be cited, just like in the Iranian Azerbaijanis' article for the figures of that ethnic group in Iran.'''" The purpose here is not to address both of our points, rather, it is to improve the article. I find it rather deterring to have to discuss for days and days an edit as basic as adding a reliable source just because some editors don't like it. The article is more neutral and well-balanced with this source than without it.<b><span style="color:orange">---Wikaviani </span></b><sup><small><b>] ]</b></small></sup> 19:25, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
::::Yes, you should also read each editors' comments carefully, because I have not raised the same points as Beshogur. I have not even participated in this discussion until a few days ago and instead came up with a suggestion to solve the dispute, but you're now grouping people together, which is not ideal. ] (]) 19:44, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::I was talking about Beshogur and Grandmaster, not you. I know you and i know that you were not editing here in the same way than the 2 others. This discussion is going nowhere, maybe a RfC could help us to solve this issue.<b><span style="color:orange">---Wikaviani </span></b><sup><small><b>] ]</b></small></sup> 19:52, 19 January 2024 (UTC)


== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 November 2024 ==
::: Please read carefully. Khaemeni speakes both Persian and Azeri-Turkish very well. He says in his biography that he learned as kid as it was a language used in his house. When Aliyev or Erbakan comes to Tehran, he doesn't need a translator. Also the name Azarbaijan is Iranian (it is not in any ancient Turkish source). --] 16:28, 17 August 2006 (UTC)


{{edit extended-protected|Azerbaijanis|answered=no}}
Add Azerbaijani diaspora to map to infobox.


] ] (]) 10:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
::::I am curious to know, where did Khamnei said he knows Azeri-Turkish very well . On his own official site, there is no mention of Azeri what so ever. Can you please direct me to your source of claim. I can't find any information regarding his ability to talk Turkish with Erbakan either. I am an Azeri Turk myself and have grown up within kilometers of the Turkish border, have Turkish friends, yet not comfortable talking simple topics with a Turkish person , how can he talk state matters with head of another state only talking Azeri perhaps with his grandpa? Thanks. ] 19:38, 3 September 2006 (UTC)


== Azerbaijani population ==
== Azeris in Fars province? ==


What are the estimates for the population of Azeri Turks? ] (]) 14:12, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
I'm not sure whether it's accurate to state that Azeris live in Fars. I think those who live there are actually the ] who aren't really Azeri. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 03:42, 21 August 2006.</small>


:Do you genuinely believe Arakelova's estimates are true? 6 million Azerbaijanis in Iran? A country with 90 millions people. Which makes Azerbaijanis 6.5% of Iranian population. This source shouldn't even be here normally but stays because it's a "RS" according to some. Previously I have shown Arakelova's bias against Azerbaijan with her personal social media also a ] professor. I wonder if someone would take some professor from ] serious regarding something about Armenia. Plus her numbers can be considered a fringe theory since it doesn't even match the closest lowest numbers. ] (]) 15:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
== "Azeri Genetic" ==
::No need to get into ]-like discussions here. You can ask these questions in ], ], or ]. Arakelova's source seem to talk about people who speak ], not ethnic Azerbaijanis necessarily. So it might be ] to include it here.
::Arakelova is also ]. There seems to be lots of assumptions on her paper, see page 281 in the paper ] (]) 15:37, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
:::It's basically unreliable as I pointed out, yet it stays here for some reason. ] (]) 15:49, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
::::I think the bigger issue is that it is ] and may be ]. I'd recommend ]. Based on discussion there you can keep or remove the source. ] (]) 15:54, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
:::::Can you open a topic? I can add my comment and add involved users regarding this source (here and ] talk pages). ] (]) 16:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
::::::Attacking a source and assuming that 6.5% of the population is small (according to you) you’re basically attacking a source and are trying to remove. This is beyond problematic. It takes two or more to edit war, there are different estimates and they should stay up. Do not attack sources please ] (]) 11:39, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
:::::::We’re not discussing the validity of a source, I don’t think it’s up to us. Let’s always bring up the central point which is that if mean numbers of Azerbaijani populations and Arakelova’s estimates are correct, the number would come down to 15 million. ] (]) 11:46, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
::::::::Once again, I don’t know if it’s accurate or not, that’s why I put it as 15-35 million (lowest to highest estimate) and you guys seem to have a problem with it. ] (]) 11:47, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
::What are you even talking about? What bias, where? Why are you asking me if I believe in the source? If anything, you seem biased. Apparently you’re not allowed to include estimates that say anything below 35 million with a sloppy date of 2002. Stop attacking Arakelova’s source! ] (]) 04:58, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
:::You guys totally twisted it. You’ve failed to bring up the main point and went in for the source. You also talked about Iranian Azeris page which shouldn’t even been in this discussion. ] (]) 05:00, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
::::Because Iranian Azerbaijanis are Azerbaijanis? Arakelova's numbers is outlier. No one gives the same numbers as her. Thus removed. ] (]) 13:01, 27 December 2024 (UTC)


== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 25 December 2024 ==
It's this a new Style of Rassismus ala Hitler or what ? <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 13:48, 25 September 2006.</small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->


{{Edit extended-protected|Azerbaijanis|answered=yes}}
:What's wrong with a little genetics? &mdash;<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">]]</span> 01:41, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Providing further information of Azerbaijanis residing outside of the Republic of Azerbaijan, adding the numbers as well as references to support the claim. ] (]) 15:24, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

:] '''Not done''': it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a ] and provide a ] if appropriate.<!-- Template:EEp --> ] (]) 06:31, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
::Maybe they are scared of the results? And last I checked, Hitler and the Nazi's never used genetics. LOL] 02:01, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

== Information about Pishevari ==

Please do not remove sourced material from the article, specially the material from ''Encyclopaedia of Islam''.] 20:44, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
:: The new encyclopedia of Islam does not consider TOP SECRET declassified information that were recently published by the former USSR within the last 5-10. This changes a lot of the equation and views on Ferqeh. Note the classified documents were memos from Stalin to Baqeroff himself. So unless you have new sources that take this major historic viewpoint shift into account, then it is considered obsolete with that regard. Plus this is not an article on Ferqeh to write 20 lines on it. --] 21:38, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Encyclopedia of Islam is a very '''old''' resource and many articles have not been updated in '''years'''. It is not the best resource for these kinds of topics. ] 06:49, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

:To give example, Encyclopedia of Islam does not even call ] ''Iran'' but '''Persia''' and ''Iranian citizens'' as ''Persians'' despite if even they are not ethnically Persian! LOL ] 06:50, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

:: The ] is an authoritative source written by experts. If anyone wants to disprove the EI, he/she has to come up with REALLY good literature. ] 10:19, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

::: True it is good on historical aspects. But information on modern politics can change. The new released top secret materials that are memo's from Stalin to Baqirov is a case point. --] 14:15, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

:::: The removed sentences were about linguistic and cultural grievances of Azerbaijanis at that time, this does not need '''top secret''' documents :) ] 00:43, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

::::: This article is not about Ferqeh. And I disagree that there was wide linguistic grievances as the government of Pishevari would not have fallen in oneday if it was popular. Also any analysis of the movement should take the above unclassified secret materials into account since they effect all aspects of the image of Ferqeh. --] 02:30, 8 October 2006 (UTC)



:::::: We cannot rely on our ''individual'' beliefs, it is safer to refer to some academic sources. If you can provide any scholarly source regarding your ''beliefs'', it would greatly enhance the article.] 05:27, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

::::::: I agree with alidoostzadeh, your additions are highly speculative and POV. On top of that, your selective "academic sources" are not verifiable as the links you've provided require registration. --] 06:25, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

::::::: According to Iran: A country Study by the Federal Research Division, Kessinger Publishing , ''Without Soviet Backing, the Pishevari government collapsed and Pishevari himself fled to the Soviet Unition''. I can show great many instances where the Pishevari government was despised and that is why it collapsed without any resistance unlike the Kurdish democratic party which had some grass root support amongst Sunni Kurds. Also the Encyclopedia of Islam article is old whereas my unclassified top secret sources are new and show there was no internal movement that led to such a party but it was the sole external creation of Stalin. It was previously unknown to some (not all) scholars why the Pishevari government all of the sudden rose up after the USSR invasion of NW Iran, but with the new unclassified information, everything is made clear and the new analysis on the movement should mention these three important sources something the OLD encyclopedia of Islam article does not and tries to find reasons. There is nothing POV about the unclassified top seceret documents showing that the creation of the party was directly by the order of Stalin and thus it was no internal movement within Iran and it collapsed the first day the USSR left within 24 hours. --] 09:22, 9 October 2006 (UTC)


I think one of the reasons for irredentist movement in Iranian Azerbaijan was Persianization campaign, which was pursued by Reza shah. This information is verifiable from scholarly literature.

''The steps that the Teheran regime took in the 1930s with the aim of Persianization of the Azeris and other minorities appeared to take a leaf from the writings of the reformist-minded intellectuals in the previous decade. In the quest of imposing national homogeneity on the country where half of the population consisted of ethnic minorities, the Pahlavi regime issued in quick succession bans on the use of Azeri on the premises of schools, in theatrical performances, religious ceremonies, and, finally, in the publication of books. Azeri was reduced to the status of a language that only could be spoken and hardly ever written. As the Persianization campaign gained momentum, it drew inspiration from the revivalist spirit of Zoroastrian national glories. There followed even more invasive official practices, such as changing Turkic-sounding geographic names and interference with giving children names other than Persian ones''.

<u>Tadeusz Swietochowski, Russia and Azerbaijan: A Borderland in Transition. ISBN: 0231070683</u>

] 06:56, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

::: There was no irredentist movement, except what the USSR created by the direct orders of Stalin as the unclassified top-secret information clearly establishes. It is true that Persian was declared the only official language since 1906 (before Pahlavi and during the constitutionalist movement) and the Pahlavi's only thought Persian the official language in school except for few cases. And there was a Zoroastrianist campaign which was more at an attempt for de-Islamification of Iranian society much like Ataturk's de-Islamification campaign. But as for choosing the name part, I disagree since majority of Iranians have Arabic names, and Turkish names like Yashar, Aidin, Sanaaz are as popular as any other name during the Pahlavid era. A good example is Shohreh Aghdashloo who is the wife of Aydin Aghdashloo. Of course there was more serious Azerification campaign of Kurds, Talysh and Lezgins and etc or even more serious one in Turkey and Ba'athist Iraq. I am not sure how much of all these informations are relavent to Pishevari. But the current discussion is about Pishevari's movement and there should be a separate article on Ferqeh and Pishevari. According to Iran: A country Study by the Federal Research Division, Kessinger Publishing , ''Without Soviet Backing, the Pishevari government collapsed and Pishevari himself fled to the Soviet Unition''. Not much of a popular movement, if it collapsed less than a day without USSR backing. It actually collapsed in about a day because people of Tabriz actually revolted against it and there is a lot of memoirs about this as well another source I brought from Professor. Hess. I am not sure putting up two three pages about Pishevari movement is a good idea on this article and it should have it's own relavent article. It was previously unknown to some scholars why the Pishevari government out of the sudden rose up after the USSR invasion of NW Iran, but with the new unclassified information, everything is made clear and new analsysis should mention these three important sources and I am of the opinion that any old analysis is obsolete because of these three important sources which shows that the party was created by the direct order of Stalin. --] 09:11, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:01, 27 December 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Azerbaijanis article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Former featured articleAzerbaijanis is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 6, 2006.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 27, 2006Featured article candidatePromoted
May 23, 2012Featured article reviewDemoted
Did You KnowA fact from this article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 4, 2004.The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Azerbaijanis live in Iran, Georgia, Turkey, Iraq and the United States, as well as Azerbaijan?
Current status: Former featured article
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconAzerbaijan Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Azerbaijan-related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijanWikiProject icon
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconEthnic groups Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

WikiProject iconIran Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.


Suggesting a change on history category.

I’m suggesting a change and almost a total rewrite of the history category. When you read the history category you quickly realise this isn’t talking about the history of the Azerbaijanis but the history of the land of modern day Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan already has its own Misplaced Pages page where the history of the land is mentioned so also mentioning it in this page which is talking about the Azerbaijani ethnicity is wrong because the Turks of Azerbaijan didn’t enter the area until the 700-1000s. For example example mentioning the atabegs of Azerbaijan, Seljuks, the qizilbash and the role of Azerbaijanis in the Safavid, afsharid, and qajar empires would make much more sense then mentioning what people lived in the lands before, this is after all a Misplaced Pages page about the Azerbaijanis. Altynordu (talk) 14:02, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

For the record, Altynordu has been indefinitely blocked as WP:NOTHERE. Aintabli (talk) 22:32, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Infobox and WP:UNDUE?

I believe @Beshogur and @Wikaviani can discuss the matter here. I guess the main argument of Beshogur is that the infobox can give undue weight to minority opinions, when separately mentioned. A middleway I can come up with is to revise how the sources are presented there so that there is no undue attention given. Aintabli (talk) 22:24, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

There is no such thing as "undue weight" here, please read the WP:UNDUE WEIGHT carefully, i quote from it :
"If a viewpoint is in the majority, then it should be easy to substantiate it with reference to commonly accepted reference texts;
If a viewpoint is held by a significant minority, then it should be easy to name prominent adherents;
If a viewpoint is held by an extremely small (or vastly limited) minority, it does not belong in Misplaced Pages (except perhaps in some ancillary article) regardless of whether it is true or not; and regardless of whether you can prove it or not.
Views held only by a tiny minority of people should not be represented as significant minority views, and perhaps should not be represented at all."
here we have a viewpoint held by not only a significant minority but also by prominent experts of this topic.
In addition to Arakelova, let me quote Rasmus Christian Elling (another prominent expert of this topic) : "The number of Azeris in Iran is heavily disputed. In 2005, Amanolahi estimated all Turkic-speaking communities in Iran to number no more than 9 million. CIA and Library of congress estimates range from 16 to 24 percent—that is, 12–18 million people if we employ the latest total figure for Iran's population (77.8 million). Azeri ethnicsts, on the other hand, argue that overall number is much higher, even as much as 50 percent or more of the total population. Such inflated estimates may have influenced some Western scholars who suggest that up to 30 percent (that is, some 23 million today) Iranians are Azeris" thus, this viewpoint is all but held by an extremely small minority (like people supporting flat Earth for example, as said in our guideline). Content is well-sourced and should be restored as per WP:NPOV. Best.---Wikaviani 23:45, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
I am not going to dive into the discussion, but I have restored the figure in the infobox as I did not realize it was removed several months ago. Aintabli (talk) 00:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Ok, thanks.---Wikaviani 02:17, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
In 2005, Iran's population was 70 million, and 82 million in 2015. Claiming they're 6 million in 2020 is a fringe view, and does not match other views, thus it is undue. I'd rather take CIA world factbook than Yerevan state university professor. Beshogur (talk) 10:53, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Is that your sole argument ? seriously ? Iran had a population of 70 million in 2005 and 84 million in 2020, an increase of 20%, so there are 7,2 millions Azeris in Iran in 2020, so what ? that makes sources like Arakelova or Elling "fringe view" ? come on. As to the CIA, the Elling source is from it.---Wikaviani 16:54, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
All those listed sources are more than decade old and they give a number above 10 million. Which makes Arakelova's numbers fringe. Beshogur (talk) 00:58, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Arakelova is not the only reliable source that gives lower figures, Elling gives comparable figures too, anyway, it's a reliable source and it has to remain in the article as per WP:NPOV.---Wikaviani 02:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Am I missing the other sources giving lower figures? Beshogur (talk) 11:37, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
As i said above, Elling gives a figure lower than 9 million (in 2005) for all Turkic speakers of Iran so Azerbaijanis alone would be lesser than 8 million in 2005, with a 20% increase, that would mean that there are about 9,5 million (maximum) today.---Wikaviani 13:51, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
8 million is over 11% in 2005. Arakelova's 2020 numbers equals to 7% of 2020 Iranian population, which is mathematically impossible. Beshogur (talk) 15:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Well, Arakelova's estimate represents between 7 and 8% of the current Iranian population, while Elling's 9,5 millions estimate is around 11%, wow, what a big deal, both are well below the other fanciful estimates (some Azerbaijanis ethnicists claim over 50% of Iranian population ...).---Wikaviani 20:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
No you're showing the lowest estimates. Even Elling's 9,5 millions estimate is around 11% is 3-4% further from Arakelova. While most sources claim +- 20%. Beshogur (talk) 20:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Don't know what you're talking about, you asked me the other source with comparable figures with that of Arakelova, that source is Elling and 3 - 4 % difference is not a big deal, given that there is no official census for the ethnic groups of Iran. In Addition to that, Arakelova is the most recent source of the list, many of the others are at least 10 years old, they should probably be removed as they are almost oudated for such a topic.---Wikaviani 10:20, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
I am saying Elling's 3-4% difference is closest what we have to Arakelova. That's now even remotely close, plus that's the lowest we have. many of the others are at least 10 years old, they should probably be removed as they are almost oudated for such a topic Just because Yerevan State University professor says so, we should not remove a source because it is 10 years old. These sources are 10 years old, yet mentions double the Yerevan State University professor's numbers. Beshogur (talk) 14:32, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Because Arakelova is Yerevan state University professor that source should be removed ? I'm sorry, but i'm not enclined to accept that. As i said, there are no official census for ethnic groups living in Iran, thus, sources give many estimates, they should be cited in order to keep a neutral point od view. Yet, Arakelova's estimate is not so far away that of Elling.---Wikaviani 18:57, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
This discussion does not appear to be getting anywhere as both parties are not nearing any consensus. But I believe Wikaviani makes a good point about sources' age. In order to solve the disagreement, we can instead use sources from the last 5 years in the infobox, so that the question isn't about Arakelova and older sources. Arakelova is already cited throughout the article, so the infobox is not the only place it is found in, and its total removal is a completely different issue that should be separately discussed. Several sources from the last 5 years I found, about 15 million (2021), 16 million (2021), 18 million (2022), over 18 million (2020), almost 20 million (2020), about 20 million (2022), over 20 million (2021). What are both of your opinions on this? Aintabli (talk) 19:18, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Previously, I mentioned my concerns about her bias. You can check her personal vk.com account. But I want this being removed because it does not match other numbers, I don't care about Yerevan State University, whatsoever. Beshogur (talk) 20:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

I would go with Aintabili's proposal, old sources removed, Arakelova's figure kept in, more recent sources added instead of the old ones. I don't read Russian and i don't trust Russian sites either, thus, i don't care about vk.com.---Wikaviani 09:00, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

My proposal involves the removal of Arakelova's figure (which is from 2015) from the infobox as only sources from the last 5 years will be used (hence, partially solving the disagreement), but the figure and her opinions will stay within the article. Would you still agree? Aintabli (talk) 15:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
I don't get well why we should chose that threshold of "5 years", i mentioned above the 10+ years old sources. Also, Arakelova is cited in the Iranian Azerbaijanis article.---Wikaviani 08:29, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
This was a compromise I thought could be acceptable to both of you. Beshogur wants Arakelova to be wholly removed, but it merits an independent discussion, and the particular locus of the dispute was the infobox. And you've pointed out the age of the other sources. The purpose here is to address both of your points. (I'm underlining that this doesn't involve the total removal of Arakelova.) Choosing sources from the last 5 years isn't particularly different from using 10 years as the threshold. Aintabli (talk) 15:18, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

I don't find Arakelova's numbers to be compelling. And the range of 6 to 23 million is impossible. Most sources provide the numbers of around 15-20 million. For example, Britannica provides the figure of 15 million for Iranian Azerbaijanis at the turn of 21st century, and that number is dated. It should certainly rise in the last 20 years. You can see even from the infobox how many sources provide higher estimates against a single low estimate by Arakelova. It is better to stick to the range that the majority of sources provide. Grandmaster 17:04, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Britannica is not a reliable source, you should know that better than me since you have been editing here for about 18 years. A far better source than Britannica (Elling/Amanolahi) estimated all Turkic-speaking communities in Iran to number no more than 9 million (in 2005) that would mean that the number of Azerbaijanis in Iran was barely half of what Britannica says while that figure was given 5 years after the turn of 21st century ... I'm sorry, but the fact that Beshogur doesn't want Arakelova's source is not enough for me, that source is one of the best sources we have for this topic and should be cited, just like in the Iranian Azerbaijanis' article for the figures of that ethnic group in Iran. You guys are only making some original research based on weaker sources, like Britannica or others.---Wikaviani 18:01, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Could you address my comment above? Aintabli (talk) 18:30, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Please read what i said, i addressed it : " I'm sorry, but the fact that Beshogur doesn't want Arakelova's source is not enough for me, that source is one of the best sources we have for this topic and should be cited, just like in the Iranian Azerbaijanis' article for the figures of that ethnic group in Iran." The purpose here is not to address both of our points, rather, it is to improve the article. I find it rather deterring to have to discuss for days and days an edit as basic as adding a reliable source just because some editors don't like it. The article is more neutral and well-balanced with this source than without it.---Wikaviani 19:25, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Yes, you should also read each editors' comments carefully, because I have not raised the same points as Beshogur. I have not even participated in this discussion until a few days ago and instead came up with a suggestion to solve the dispute, but you're now grouping people together, which is not ideal. Aintabli (talk) 19:44, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
I was talking about Beshogur and Grandmaster, not you. I know you and i know that you were not editing here in the same way than the 2 others. This discussion is going nowhere, maybe a RfC could help us to solve this issue.---Wikaviani 19:52, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 November 2024

It is requested that an edit be made to the extended-confirmed-protected article at Azerbaijanis. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any extended confirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{EEp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

Add Azerbaijani diaspora to map to infobox.

182.216.56.195 (talk) 10:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Azerbaijani population

What are the estimates for the population of Azeri Turks? Vofa (talk) 14:12, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Do you genuinely believe Arakelova's estimates are true? 6 million Azerbaijanis in Iran? A country with 90 millions people. Which makes Azerbaijanis 6.5% of Iranian population. This source shouldn't even be here normally but stays because it's a "RS" according to some. Previously I have shown Arakelova's bias against Azerbaijan with her personal social media also a Yerevan State University professor. I wonder if someone would take some professor from Baku State University serious regarding something about Armenia. Plus her numbers can be considered a fringe theory since it doesn't even match the closest lowest numbers. Beshogur (talk) 15:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
No need to get into WP:Forum-like discussions here. You can ask these questions in Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources/Noticeboard, Misplaced Pages:No original research/Noticeboard, or Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard. Arakelova's source seem to talk about people who speak Azerbaijani language, not ethnic Azerbaijanis necessarily. So it might be WP:OR to include it here.
Arakelova is also WP:Primary. There seems to be lots of assumptions on her paper, see page 281 in the paper Bogazicili (talk) 15:37, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
It's basically unreliable as I pointed out, yet it stays here for some reason. Beshogur (talk) 15:49, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
I think the bigger issue is that it is WP:Primary and may be WP:UNDUE. I'd recommend Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard. Based on discussion there you can keep or remove the source. Bogazicili (talk) 15:54, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Can you open a topic? I can add my comment and add involved users regarding this source (here and Iranian Azerbaijanis talk pages). Beshogur (talk) 16:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Attacking a source and assuming that 6.5% of the population is small (according to you) you’re basically attacking a source and are trying to remove. This is beyond problematic. It takes two or more to edit war, there are different estimates and they should stay up. Do not attack sources please Vofa (talk) 11:39, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
We’re not discussing the validity of a source, I don’t think it’s up to us. Let’s always bring up the central point which is that if mean numbers of Azerbaijani populations and Arakelova’s estimates are correct, the number would come down to 15 million. Vofa (talk) 11:46, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Once again, I don’t know if it’s accurate or not, that’s why I put it as 15-35 million (lowest to highest estimate) and you guys seem to have a problem with it. Vofa (talk) 11:47, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
What are you even talking about? What bias, where? Why are you asking me if I believe in the source? If anything, you seem biased. Apparently you’re not allowed to include estimates that say anything below 35 million with a sloppy date of 2002. Stop attacking Arakelova’s source! Vofa (talk) 04:58, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
You guys totally twisted it. You’ve failed to bring up the main point and went in for the source. You also talked about Iranian Azeris page which shouldn’t even been in this discussion. Vofa (talk) 05:00, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Because Iranian Azerbaijanis are Azerbaijanis? Arakelova's numbers is outlier. No one gives the same numbers as her. Thus removed. Beshogur (talk) 13:01, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 25 December 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Providing further information of Azerbaijanis residing outside of the Republic of Azerbaijan, adding the numbers as well as references to support the claim. Nuritae331 (talk) 15:24, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Aintabli (talk) 06:31, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: