Revision as of 13:59, 4 January 2018 editLcxzdf56 (talk | contribs)24 edits →Sudan edit conflict← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:08, 9 January 2025 edit undoCooldudeseven7 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers3,376 edits →January 2025: reply to ArjayayTag: CD | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|index= | |index= | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| algo = old( |
| algo = old(21d) | ||
| archive = User talk:Arjayay/Archive %(counter)d | | archive = User talk:Arjayay/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| counter = |
| counter = 34 | ||
| maxarchivesize = 75K | | maxarchivesize = 75K | ||
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} | | archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} | ||
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 | | minthreadstoarchive = 1 | ||
| minthreadsleft = 4 | | minthreadsleft = 4 | ||
}} |
}} | ||
<!---♦♦♦ Please put new posts at the BOTTOM of the page and include a title set between double == signs ♦♦♦---> | |||
==E-mails== | |||
==E-mails== | |||
<!-- ] 20:29, 17 September 2025 (UTC) -->{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|1758140976}} | <!-- ] 20:29, 17 September 2025 (UTC) -->{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|1758140976}} | ||
You can use "Email this user" |
You can use "Email this user", but I will probably reply on your talk page, or the article talk page, as discussions should be open and on the record.<br />I have experienced problems with e-mails not being delivered, so please leave me a message on this page if I have not replied within 48 hours. | ||
<!---♦♦♦ Please put new posts at the BOTTOM of the page and include a title set between double == signs ♦♦♦---> | |||
==Broadcasted== | ==Broadcasted== | ||
<!---♦♦♦ Please put new posts at the BOTTOM of the page and include a title set between double == signs ♦♦♦---> | |||
<!-- ] 20:29, 17 September 2025 (UTC) -->{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|1758140976}} | <!-- ] 20:29, 17 September 2025 (UTC) -->{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|1758140976}} | ||
states the use is , so it should not be used. The word also appears on ] | states the use is ''sometimes'' , so it should not be used. The word also appears on ] | ||
Broadcasted appears in some dictionaries, but others, e.g. state "Sorry, no entries for Broadcasted were found".<br /> | Broadcasted appears in some dictionaries, but others, e.g. state "Sorry, no entries for Broadcasted were found".<br /> | ||
Broadcast appears in all dictionaries, and should be used as ] - "Misplaced Pages tries to find words that are common to all varieties of English". | Broadcast appears in all dictionaries, and should be used as ] - "Misplaced Pages tries to find words that are common to all varieties of English". | ||
A May 2023 search for gave over 234,000 uses, compared with a search for which gave just 99.<br /> | |||
Of these |
Of these, 16 are redirects to "Broadcast" articles, 14 refer to a 2015 Canadian TV award and 5 relate to a 1924 cartoon. The rest are in quotations. | ||
<!---♦♦♦ Please put new posts at the BOTTOM of the page and include a title set between double == signs ♦♦♦---> | |||
---- | ---- | ||
---- | ---- | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
== ] == | |||
You're an established editor, so I'll spare you the template, but you have reverted four times by now. A self-revert would be a good idea. ] (]) 21:53, 6 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
: ] - AFAIK, dealing with vandalism, as shown by the blocking of ], is exempt from 3RR - ] (]) 21:56, 6 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
::The IP was clearly disruptive, but not strictly speaking a vandal, and Jerry Stockton certainly isn't one. You are in imminent danger of being blocked. ] (]) 21:58, 6 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
== About reverts you made == | |||
I think my edits were improvements. Could you please put your opinion on why awkward attribution is needed when the statement is accepted by all scholars as established historic incidents with no contrary narration? Their presence reduces readability and adds nothing to the article. --] (]) 10:30, 8 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
:Hi ] - I assume you are talking about ]? <br>It sometimes helps to know who is making a statement as you read it, rather than have to keep going to the references section to find out who made it. This is especially true for those statements headed "According to the Sikh tradition" - it is important that the reader can differentiate between historical fact and Sikh tradition. If you wish to re-remove the named authors, please do so, but please keep it clear what information is just based on "Sikh tradition", rather than presenting that as historical fact. - Thanks - ] (]) 10:45, 8 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
::You are right. Factual statement should be different from beliefs. But things like the year when Person A met where with whom for what reason are historic records, these are about 400 year old event recorded duly by multiple historians with no contradiction, hence there is no need to attribute them to any writer. I believe it is not necessary to qualify such information, readers do not get any more information about the article by doing this, but it may reduce the readability and flow of the text. I will review all the changes that I intended to do and filter out any if it is not a commonly acknowledged historic information. Thanks. --] (]) 08:58, 11 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
::I think you have concern about these two statements which I modified: | |||
::# According to the Sikh tradition, his youngest sons, aged 5 and 8, were executed by burying them alive into a wall after they refused to convert to Islam. | |||
::# According to the Sikh tradition, Guru Gobind Singh saw the war conduct of Aurangzeb and his army against his family and his people as a betrayal of a promise, unethical, unjust and impious. | |||
::These two are historic information. There are no narratives in existence that contradict these. It is not subject to Sikh tradition if the sons were killed as a matter of fact and hence need not be stated like that, it only dilutes a simple historic statement. I am open to attribution if the oppressor Mughal's account is different. As far as I know these are glorified as conquests of the Muslim rulers of that time. So, the victor and the victim's record and other historic records concur on the specifics of the event. --] (]) 09:16, 11 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
== "In use" == | |||
Urgh. It says, "To help avoid edit conflicts, please do not edit this page while this message is displayed." And -lo! yes, I just got an edit conflict. I'm grateful for your removal of a single word twice, but the error had been noted and there is NODEADLINE. Thank you! Happy Happy Friday! <sup><small>''Note duplicate word''</sup></small> ]]] 17:37, 8 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
:Hi ] I opened that page directly in edit mode, with the search set for the double word, so did not even see the template until after I had saved - I could have reverted myself, but that would still have given you a conflict, Sorry, for the conflict, but at least these are easy do deal with these days, - select "my text" and save. - ] (]) 17:44, 8 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
== A barnstar for you! == | == A barnstar for you! == | ||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | ||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | ||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Barnstar |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Copyeditor's Barnstar''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thanks thanks for for being being a a great great WikiGnome WikiGnome and and removing removing all all those those duplicate duplicate words words. ] <sup>(] • ])</sup> 19:12, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I couldn't find one that said "Overly Diligent" :p | |||
Sorry if that was snarky, it's just that if theres someting that annoys me even more than Boris Johnson's haircut, it's edit-conflicts. | |||
Take care, ]]] 17:45, 8 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
|} | |} | ||
== Hi == | |||
== My edits are being reverted too much even with citations == | |||
How are you? @] i would ask you if you can help me to create page abou this topic ] (]) 11:06, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:] your edit was removed because it was not sourced to a ], as Misplaced Pages is NOT a reliable source. Looking at your talk page, you have had lots of warnings about making unsourced additions, including two from me, one about the same article, in May.<br>Please read and follow ], ] and ] -or you are likely to be blocked. Please also understand that Misplaced Pages has NO interest in who you are, where you are from, or what you "know". Wkipedia is ONLY interested in what ] have already said about a subject, which needs to be cited. - ] (]) 18:42, 10 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
: ] (]) 11:12, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== A beer for you == | |||
::Sorry ], I don't know why you came to me to make your first two edits, but I don't have enough time to create articles on subjects I am interested in.<br>Furthermore, I can't read Turkish or Arabic, so I couldn't really help even if I wanted to. - Best wishes - ] (]) 11:18, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
::: This is a blocked ]. <b>] ]</b> 16:14, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For your edit on Sergio Agüero. Thanks. 20:19, 13 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
== |
== A barnstar for you! == | ||
I find this BOTY source used in many articles like thalaivaa film etc. https://bestoftheyear.in/movie/thuppakki/ is this source also not a reliable source???--] (]) 17:51, 14 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
:Hi ] - I have answered on your talk page. - ] (]) 18:14, 14 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
Thank you ] :) cheers--] (]) 18:16, 14 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
== You've got mail == | |||
sir solapur akkalkot are border ares interstate boundaries suffering from development imbalancd. | |||
i solpaur i have added the official fact in central railway time table oct 2015 it was lsited as in top 100 booking stations in India. | |||
i am rated five star for my reviews on Indian railways at mouthshut.com and my blogs. | |||
everal articles of wikipedia are uninforfmative. | |||
Akkalkot most important is swami samrtha temple. the region is backward let it develop and let people insist on dvelopment by reading my infofrmation. | |||
the trunk line Mumbai-chennai is not given proper attention and many people and sources can cite. | |||
wikipedia info on solapur is partailly correct it is on Mumbai-hyderabad lined but histrically for 150 yaers it is known as Mumbai-Chennai line. | |||
gangapur page is mislezding as most important gangapur is in Karnataka state flocked by people. we are from the region .we know better than somebody frfom miles away place. | |||
no vadalism but trying to guide people constructively . most imp trains at akkalkot are udyan exp and chennai mail rest are local passenger trains . | |||
there was newspaoper article on neglect of this place. | |||
people at one stroke should know how to visit the pace from Mumbai . is transport avilable from station. | |||
tp 100 booking stations iss an achievement for backward region like silapur not trivia . if i know it having read timetable i should give it so that development imbalance is rectifided. noble intentions. of guiding people accurately. no business or profit! i respect you | |||
{{You've got mail|dashlesssig=] (]) 17:45, 17 December 2017 (UTC)}} | |||
i have sent you mail sir anil | |||
:Hi ] - I have replied on your talk page, please keep the conversation there - thanks - ] (]) 18:22, 17 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
===Section moved from middle of page=== | |||
sir i fully beleive in not having timetable. but the raticle carried trivia timetable right from begining not needed . what people need is the most important trains udyan express and chennail mail rather than local passenger trains which are lsuisted. sso what u said is in contradiction . i want to avoid timetables. timetables are listed there by somebody elser. | |||
top 100 booking station is not trivia. views differ. many people are interested in knowing . the city will devlop . poor will benefit. | |||
BTW Akkalkot is visited by discoples from America africa, all across world. they need to know that there is trabnsport available from station. they may be misguidded by alighting at siolapur 40 kms awat and may be cheated by transport operators. contrary to what you have said timetables existed before my editing . unnecessary yes . | |||
but will be nice if local regional people decide what type of content they want . Many sent me emails sayimg grat wrok . u gave info in two lines about which trains from international city | |||
Mumbai bangalore will take them at akkalkot overnight. they were surprisedd at poor treatmentof the trunk line. they thanked me. they would like to help development .still after this point i will respect and not add external links frfom today onwards. it is ot english but lack of time . i do lot of scientific research find less time i respect you a lot <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 18:36, 17 December 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:] | |||
# Please do not add posts into the middle of the page, I have had to move it down here | |||
# Please sign all posts on talk pages with 4 tildes <nowiki>( ~~~~ )</nowiki> which will add your signature and a timestamp | |||
# Please note that immediately above I stated " I have replied on your talk page, please keep the conversation there" - ] (]) 18:52, 17 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
== A cupcake for you! == | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | ||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | ||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Special Barnstar''' | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For reverting lorem ipsum on ]. ] (]) 17:03, 18 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Happy New Year, Arjayay! In 2024, other editors thanked you using the ] on the English Misplaced Pages. This made you the '''#1 most thanked Wikipedian in 2024'''. Congratulations and, well, ''thank you'' for all that you do for Misplaced Pages. Here's to 2025! ] (]) 19:17, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
|} | |} | ||
:Thanks ] - I also got ] semi-protected for 6 months<br>I suspect the vandalism will resurface somewhere else, so have bookmarked an article search for Lorem ipsum - ] (]) 17:30, 18 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
== Articles for Creation Reviewing == | |||
{| style="background:#E6FFE6; border:1px solid #000080; padding: 10px; width: auto" | |||
|- | |||
|rowspan=2 style="position:relative; right:6px"| ] | |||
|- | |||
|{{large|Hello, {{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />BASEPAGENAME}}.}} | |||
{{AFC status|align=right}} | |||
I recently sent you an invitation to join NPP, but you also might be the right candidate for another related project, ], <u>which is also extremely backlogged.</u> <br /> | |||
'''Would you please consider becoming an ]?''' Articles for Creation reviewers help new users learn the ropes of creating their first articles, and identify whether topics are suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages. Reviewing drafts doesn't take much time but <u>it requires a good understanding of Misplaced Pages inclusion policies and guidelines</u>; currently Misplaced Pages needs experienced users at this task. (After ], reviewing is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read ] before making your decision. Thanks. — '''''<small>] <sup>(])</sup></small>''''' 03:14, 29 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
|}<!-- Template:AfC invite --> | |||
== The past tense of "broadcast" == | |||
Hello | |||
Until a couple of days ago, I thought "broadcast" is an irregular verb like "cast". All of this changed four days ago, when someone changed "broadcast" into "broadcasted" in the ] article. | |||
:that's awesome. well done, @]!! ] (]) 20:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
In your argument at the top of this page, you've written: {{tq|Broadcasted appears in some dictionaries, but others, e.g. Chambers state "Sorry, no entries for Broadcasted were found".}} Well, "some dictionaries" contains a ], thus, hiding the fact the most reputable English dictionaries list "broadcasted" as valid: | |||
* ] (https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/broadcast) | |||
* '']'' (http://www.dictionary.com/browse/broadcast?r=75&src=ref&ch=dic#source-ced2) | |||
* '']'', 2004 (hardcover) | |||
* '']'', 2006 (hardcover) | |||
* ] (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/broadcast) | |||
* '']'' (http://www.dictionary.com/browse/broadcast?r=75&src=ref&ch=dic) | |||
::Thanks ], and ] - That's actually the third time I have topped the list - does that disqualify me in the future? or do I get to keep it forever, like some sporting trophies?.<br>I remind myself of these when someone is telling me I am "the most hated editor on Misplaced Pages", or similar phrases, usually because I am reverting their deliberate errors or self-promotion.<br>Thanks again - and here's to next year ! - ] (]) 15:35, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Now, the online Oxford English Dictionary does not provide past tenses and past participles, but it does recognize "broadcasted" without returning an error: . | |||
:::Not only were you first; you were the ] of thanks - the #2 person wasn't even close! Congrats. ] (]) 23:01, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
As for the rest of your argument, I don't put any weight on a search engine test that cannot distinguish between the present tense and past tense, especially when ]. | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Please pay attention that upon deciding to revert, all that an editor sees is your edit summary, unless you provide a link to your argument in the edit summary. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 20:03, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Best regards,<br/> ] (]) 07:36, 30 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
== Can you not change my edit? It's correct. == | |||
:Hi ] Thanks for your detailed post.<br>This was discussed at length in August 2014 ], when it was agreed by all parties that it should not be labelled a misspelling - and I have not labelled it a misspelling since. Re-reading that discussion, I note that I have, over time, shortened the edit summary from "Broadcasted > Broadcast as ]" to just "Broadcasted > Broadcast". | |||
I saw you changing my edit for "Nurburgring". Please don't. It's the correct information. If you look up Nurburgring Nordschieliefe lap record, it will say 5:19.546 set by Neel Jani. Please stop undoing my edits. ] (]) 17:42, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:My principal point is that its use is , so it should not be used - I don't like Misplaced Pages sounding (to my ear) semi-literate. Having rechecked the discussion and my note above, I see that the Wiktionary definition was changed from (proscribed) to (sometimes proscribed) on 24 April 2017, without any discussion.<br>Please also see the associated RVF discussion which lists some places where the use is described as proscribed, and several polls of "Language writers and editors" giving preferences for broadcast, over broadcasted, of 34:1, 25:1 and 105:2. | |||
:Your edit has been reverted again and ] has now been protected to stop you re-adding this claim, which is contrary to the consensus in the discussion at ] - If you disagree, please discuss this at that talk page - ] (]) 22:50, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Greetings == | |||
:As for the edit summary - 150,018 of my live edits have an edit summary (39 early edits do not), but long edit summaries slow down the editing process. AFAIK you are the first to have raised this in the 3 years 4 months since the misspellings discussion closed - although others may have come here and read the note at the top of the page.<br>I am not labelling it a misspelling, or hiding behind a C/E summary, but am stating very clearly what the change is, and will continue to do so. - ] (]) 17:48, 30 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
This is my first day here and I really don’t want to mess things up. I made new edits on Carnivora and Rodent pages. Did I do them okay? Am I good enough? ] (]) 16:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::Hello again. | |||
:Hi ], I have no idea why you should choose to approach me, but I am afraid I know almost nothing about taxonomy. I suggest you look at the page histories of those articles, and choose an editor who edits such articles. Best wishes - ] (]) 17:33, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks for clearing that up. Like I said, I've been using "broadcast" as the past tense my whole life. So, I don't want to dispute your or anything. But if I were to give your any advice, I'd say from now on, you need more convincing edit summaries. (Psst! Nobody will have anything against you if you used "Clippings" or similar browser extensions to streamline the process of repeatedly writing long but useful edit summaries.) The irony is that the victims of incorrect reversion here are those who go the extra miles of being sure before reverting. | |||
:: |
::ok ] (]) 21:11, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
== |
== Reverted. == | ||
] Actor photo deleted in wiki article, page is empty without file due to some user change img, its deleted by vopyright isuuses, Can you please reverted restore the old darshan image last by edit users. | |||
Le semiprotect Munnar page so that more details can be added ] (]) 18:29, 30 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
Sincerely request | |||
:] - I'm not clear what you are trying to say, but the proposal you made for a change at ] was unacceptable, and is an example of why that page remains semi-protected. - ] (]) 19:10, 30 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
@] ] (]) 08:17, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:] {{done}} - You only had to copy and paste the previous title and caption - ] (]) 09:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks. ] (]) 09:17, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Rollback == | |||
== Happy New Year, Arjayay! == | |||
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em;height:173px;{{border-radius|1em}} {{box-shadow|0.1em|0.1em|0.5em|rgba(0,0,0,0.75)}}<!-- | |||
-->" class="plainlinks">]] | |||
{{Paragraph break}} | |||
{{Center|{{resize|179%|''''']!'''''}}}} | |||
'''Arjayay''',<br />Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable ], and thanks for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. | |||
<br />] (]) 17:43, 31 December 2017 (UTC)<br /><br /> | |||
</div> | |||
''{{resize|88%|Send New Year cheer by adding {{tls|Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.}}'' | |||
{{clear}} | |||
Hello {{u|Arjayay}}. I appreciate the extensive and helpful work you do on Misplaced Pages, but I'm concerned about how you are using rollback. There are many instances where you are using rollback without providing any explanation (either in edit summaries or on user talk pages) in situations that are not {{tpq|obvious vandalism}} or another case listed at ]. | |||
== Castle vs. Chateau == | |||
For example, I noticed a {{diff2|1266924364|rollback}} on ] that was inappropriate for rollback. I then reviewed your five most recent rollbacks, and while your edits are appropriate, you're using rollback too broadly and too often without an explanation: | |||
I'm an owner of the Skvorec Castle and we traditionally use csstle for this property. | |||
* {{diff2|1268238755}}: While this is clearly a bad edit, the edit history for {{ip|2A02:2F0C:C00A:6200::/64}} doesn't indicate a vandalism-only editor and some explanation is warranted. | |||
Someone always changes the name from Castle to Chateau. We are not in France and the castle not a villa or wineyard mansion. Can you help somehow? Thank you ] (]) 11:31, 3 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
* {{diff2|1268238571}}: The misleading edit summary and unsourced change clearly warrant a warning. (I ''might'' have used rollback here, but with a warning.) | |||
* {{diff2|1268238439}}: This isn't obvious vandalism and needs to be explained. A warning for making unsourced edits would be appropriate as well. | |||
* {{diff2|1268236577}}: This appears to be a good faith edit and undoing it needs to be explained. | |||
* {{diff2|1268238306}}: I'm on the fence between vandalism and unsourced edit here, but it's not so obviously vandalism that I would do it without an explanation. (I ''might'' have used rollback here as well, but with a warning.) | |||
Please try to use rollback in a way that is consistent with ] going forward. Also, warning disruptive editors about policies and guidelines more often would benefit the project. Thank you. ] (]) 22:40, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Chateau == | |||
== There are some mis-counts - == | |||
Can you explain, pleade. why did you remove this: | |||
Name "Chateau Skvorec" invented a few years ago by an anonymous Slovak immigrant who considered himself as a "powers that be" on Misplaced Pages. Many others, including owners are strongly disagree with "chateau" and still use traditional english name Savoia or Skvorec Castle. ] (]) 11:57, 3 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
:{{re|Dmitryeremeev}} Probably because Misplaced Pages is an '']'', not a ] for privately held opinions. ] (]) 12:00, 3 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
In the article, buddhism by country ]there are many miscounts.There are 470 million buddhists in China but in the box they are counting only 244 million buddhists in China.Can you fix the problem please?? ] (]) 09:03, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:]<br>Firstly do NOT attack other editors, and do NOT include your complaint in the article itself - I have deleted that.<br>Secondly, as you say you are "an owner" you have a conflict of interest, so should NOT be editing the article. Please read and follow ]<br>Thirdly, I see from ] that a proposed name change was refused as recently as 28 October 2017. You could try another request, and provide detailed evidence of your case, but a request so soon after the last refusal, is likely to be refused.<br>As I do not read Czech, I will avoid getting involved - I only went to the article to correct your misspellings. - ] (]) 12:03, 3 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
:{{not done}} You have repeatedly been adding unsourced/false figures to multiple religion articles, and repeatedly been asked to cite reliable sources, which you have repeatedly failed to do. You have already been blocked once, and are likely to be blocked again if you continue - ] (]) 10:32, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== |
== January 2025 == | ||
Hello, I'm ]. I noticed one of your edit seemed to have removed a majority of content from ] . Your edit summary claimed to be reverting unsourced edits, but there were references, and it seems like you tried to blank the page. I am a bit concerned to how you reverted this edit. If possible, please give an explanation. If you think this is a mistake, please message me on my talk page. {{Thank}} ]. Thanks.<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> ] ] 14:19, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Thebfact is that all Czech-English dictionaries translates Zamek as the Castle and never Chateau!!! ] (]) 12:14, 3 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
(if this is an accident please tell me) | |||
:] - as I said "As I do not read Czech, I will avoid getting involved" - ] (]) 12:40, 3 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
:My error ] - there seems to be a problem with my keyboard - I undid 2 edits but it removed almost everything. This has happened before when my keyboard battery was low, so I have now changed the battery. I see you have reverted it - thanks - ] (]) 15:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
==Sudan edit conflict== | |||
::That sure is quite odd, but I suggest that if you have global rollback you might be able to use the ] ] 15:08, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Dear blogger, I respect your point of view and appreciate the diligent efforWikipediald a vast database in Misplaced Pages, but these additional facts make the article template more difficult to receive information and facts, so it must be shortened to become appropriate with the introduction of useful content and exciting for readers and Misplaced Pages and thank you very much. Appreciation and fulfillment to give you with the rapid changes in the article and therefore must be taken into consideration. ] (]) 16:18, 4 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
:] Unfortunately, your English is not very clear, so I am not sure what you are trying to say. However, you seem to be cherry picking certain information for removal under a false claim. There is no problem with the longer article, and your repeated removal of cited information, is simply vandalism. Please do NOT repeat these, or similar deletions, or you are likely to be blocked. Thank you - ] (]) 13:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
Some of the words are not formatted and arranged in a true format, that makes the reader aware of the information in this article. You want to impose your control over the article and forbid me from editing, you have no right in this article. It is available to editors all where they can share their opinions the article is not owned by you and you have no proof of ownership. ] (]) 15:55, 4 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
==Fuck Misplaced Pages and Arjayay there is no respect for my edits and options and my own rights Fucking Misplaced Pages is not your bitch mother and father dogs owner== |
Latest revision as of 15:08, 9 January 2025
Archives |
Index |
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
E-mails
You can use "Email this user", but I will probably reply on your talk page, or the article talk page, as discussions should be open and on the record.
I have experienced problems with e-mails not being delivered, so please leave me a message on this page if I have not replied within 48 hours.
Broadcasted
The Wiktionary definition of Broadcasted states the use is sometimes proscribed, so it should not be used. The word also appears on Misplaced Pages:Lists_of_common_misspellings/B
Broadcasted appears in some dictionaries, but others, e.g. Chambers state "Sorry, no entries for Broadcasted were found".
Broadcast appears in all dictionaries, and should be used as COMMONALITY - "Misplaced Pages tries to find words that are common to all varieties of English".
A May 2023 search for Broadcast gave over 234,000 uses, compared with a search for Broadcasted which gave just 99.
Of these, 16 are redirects to "Broadcast" articles, 14 refer to a 2015 Canadian TV award and 5 relate to a 1924 cartoon. The rest are in quotations.
A barnstar for you!
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
Thanks thanks for for being being a a great great WikiGnome WikiGnome and and removing removing all all those those duplicate duplicate words words. ~delta 19:12, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
Hi
How are you? @Arjayay i would ask you if you can help me to create page abou this topic Qatarijournalist (talk) 11:06, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry Qatarijournalist, I don't know why you came to me to make your first two edits, but I don't have enough time to create articles on subjects I am interested in.
Furthermore, I can't read Turkish or Arabic, so I couldn't really help even if I wanted to. - Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 11:18, 28 December 2024 (UTC)- This is a blocked LTA. OhNoitsJamie 16:14, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry Qatarijournalist, I don't know why you came to me to make your first two edits, but I don't have enough time to create articles on subjects I am interested in.
A barnstar for you!
The Special Barnstar | |
Happy New Year, Arjayay! In 2024, other editors thanked you 2390 times using the thanks tool on the English Misplaced Pages. This made you the #1 most thanked Wikipedian in 2024. Congratulations and, well, thank you for all that you do for Misplaced Pages. Here's to 2025! Mz7 (talk) 19:17, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
- that's awesome. well done, @Arjayay!! Sm8900 (talk) 20:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks Mz7, and Sm8900 - That's actually the third time I have topped the list - does that disqualify me in the future? or do I get to keep it forever, like some sporting trophies?.
I remind myself of these when someone is telling me I am "the most hated editor on Misplaced Pages", or similar phrases, usually because I am reverting their deliberate errors or self-promotion.
Thanks again - and here's to next year ! - Arjayay (talk) 15:35, 2 January 2025 (UTC)- Not only were you first; you were the Wayne Gretzky of thanks - the #2 person wasn't even close! Congrats. Diannaa (talk) 23:01, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks Mz7, and Sm8900 - That's actually the third time I have topped the list - does that disqualify me in the future? or do I get to keep it forever, like some sporting trophies?.
Nomination of 2020s in history for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2020s in history is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Decades in history until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Sm8900 (talk) 20:03, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Can you not change my edit? It's correct.
I saw you changing my edit for "Nurburgring". Please don't. It's the correct information. If you look up Nurburgring Nordschieliefe lap record, it will say 5:19.546 set by Neel Jani. Please stop undoing my edits. 2603:8000:99F0:93A0:9932:FB79:1D30:444B (talk) 17:42, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Your edit has been reverted again and Nürburgring has now been protected to stop you re-adding this claim, which is contrary to the consensus in the discussion at Talk:Nürburgring - If you disagree, please discuss this at that talk page - Arjayay (talk) 22:50, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Greetings
This is my first day here and I really don’t want to mess things up. I made new edits on Carnivora and Rodent pages. Did I do them okay? Am I good enough? Helpinghamster (talk) 16:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Helpinghamster, I have no idea why you should choose to approach me, but I am afraid I know almost nothing about taxonomy. I suggest you look at the page histories of those articles, and choose an editor who edits such articles. Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 17:33, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Reverted.
Darshan (Kannada actor) Actor photo deleted in wiki article, page is empty without file due to some user change img, its deleted by vopyright isuuses, Can you please reverted restore the old darshan image last by edit users. Sincerely request @Arjayay Musamar (talk) 08:17, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Musamar Done - You only had to copy and paste the previous title and caption - Arjayay (talk) 09:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks. Musamar (talk) 09:17, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Rollback
Hello Arjayay. I appreciate the extensive and helpful work you do on Misplaced Pages, but I'm concerned about how you are using rollback. There are many instances where you are using rollback without providing any explanation (either in edit summaries or on user talk pages) in situations that are not obvious vandalism
or another case listed at WP:ROLLBACKUSE.
For example, I noticed a rollback on Darts that was inappropriate for rollback. I then reviewed your five most recent rollbacks, and while your edits are appropriate, you're using rollback too broadly and too often without an explanation:
- : While this is clearly a bad edit, the edit history for 2A02:2F0C:C00A:6200::/64 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) doesn't indicate a vandalism-only editor and some explanation is warranted.
- : The misleading edit summary and unsourced change clearly warrant a warning. (I might have used rollback here, but with a warning.)
- : This isn't obvious vandalism and needs to be explained. A warning for making unsourced edits would be appropriate as well.
- : This appears to be a good faith edit and undoing it needs to be explained.
- : I'm on the fence between vandalism and unsourced edit here, but it's not so obviously vandalism that I would do it without an explanation. (I might have used rollback here as well, but with a warning.)
Please try to use rollback in a way that is consistent with WP:ROLLBACK going forward. Also, warning disruptive editors about policies and guidelines more often would benefit the project. Thank you. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:40, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
There are some mis-counts -
In the article, buddhism by country Buddhism by countrythere are many miscounts.There are 470 million buddhists in China but in the box they are counting only 244 million buddhists in China.Can you fix the problem please?? 103.109.59.32 (talk) 09:03, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not done You have repeatedly been adding unsourced/false figures to multiple religion articles, and repeatedly been asked to cite reliable sources, which you have repeatedly failed to do. You have already been blocked once, and are likely to be blocked again if you continue - Arjayay (talk) 10:32, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
January 2025
Hello, I'm Cooldudeseven7. I noticed one of your edit seemed to have removed a majority of content from Uyare . Your edit summary claimed to be reverting unsourced edits, but there were references, and it seems like you tried to blank the page. I am a bit concerned to how you reverted this edit. If possible, please give an explanation. If you think this is a mistake, please message me on my talk page. Thanks my talk page. Thanks. Cooldudeseven7 join in on the tea talk 14:19, 9 January 2025 (UTC) (if this is an accident please tell me)
- My error Cooldudeseven7 - there seems to be a problem with my keyboard - I undid 2 edits but it removed almost everything. This has happened before when my keyboard battery was low, so I have now changed the battery. I see you have reverted it - thanks - Arjayay (talk) 15:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- That sure is quite odd, but I suggest that if you have global rollback you might be able to use the test wikipedia Cooldudeseven7 join in on the tea talk 15:08, 9 January 2025 (UTC)