Misplaced Pages

Talk:Glycerol: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:42, 11 January 2018 editNatureium (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers25,139 edits rate← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:50, 1 March 2024 edit undoSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,318 editsm Signing comment by DrKC MD - "Glycerol Toxicity: " 
(35 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Chemicals|class=Start|importance=High}} {{WikiProject Chemicals|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Pharmacology|class=C|importance=low}} {{WikiProject Pharmacology|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Food and drink|class=start|importance=low}} {{WikiProject Food and drink|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology|class=C|importance=low}} {{WikiProject Molecular Biology|MCB=yes|MCB-importance=low}}
}} }}


Line 21: Line 21:
<blockquote></blockquote> --<small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 11:29, 13 October 2010</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <blockquote></blockquote> --<small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 11:29, 13 October 2010</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->


== External links modified == == Medical, et al, section ==


Claims there is no topical treatment for 3rd degree burns. Hmmm. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia's web-article on 3D burns claims in the treatment section that treatment may include "antibiotic creams or ointments" (which by definition are topical). The false or at least certainly misleading claim (misleading since AB treat or prevent infections subsequent to a 3DB rather than the damage itself, but since it is part of the treatment (in some cases) and aids in healing, that distinction is almost impossible to justify). This article is not about burns, and I suggest the false and quite unnecessary claim be removed.] (]) 08:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,


:You're correct. Someone must have misinterpreted the source, which at the end correctly says that no ''dressings'' have been approved for third-degree burns. The source, I might add, is a press release for a glycerin-based dressing for use in first and second-degree burns, but you can't dress a third-degree burn because that would be like putting a bandage on gangrene. The dead and dying tissue has to be removed and new skin grafted into place. But topical ointments and gels? Sure, those have to be used. So I say go ahead and remove the sentence. You can easily do that yourself. Just leave a little edit summary at the box at the bottom pointing people to this discussion. ] (]) 20:32, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
I have just modified one external link on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
::Deleted sentence claiming "no topical treatment" as discussed <span style="border-radius:9em;background:#88ff00">] </span>(]) 06:51, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://www.ksre.ksu.edu/library/hort2/mf2446.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071012040650/http://newhope.com/nutritionsciencenews/NSN_backs/Apr_99/backtalk.cfm to http://www.newhope.com/nutritionsciencenews/NSN_backs/Apr_99/backtalk.cfm


== Confusion about exact nature of glycerol and glycerin ==
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.


It seems that according to this Misplaced Pages article, glycerin and glycerol are exactly the same thing and that glycerol is a viscous liquid. However, I have read somewhere that glycerin is actually 5% water. I have also been told by someone that pure glycerol is actually a powder. Does anyone here know the authoritative truth about these things? ] (]) 13:25, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
:Glycerol, glycerine and glycerin are synonyms. Pure glycerol is a sweet-tasting syrupy liquid at normal room temperature. ] 13:42, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
::Thank you, Plantsurfer, very much for your reply.
::What is your source for this information? ] (]) 15:18, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
:::https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Glycerol. A good source for generic chem questions. --] (]) 15:28, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
:::Pubchem is good, as Smokefoot said, but another source is https://www.britannica.com/science/glycerol ] 16:06, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
::::Thank you, Smokefoot and Plantsurfer, very much indeed for your very helpful replies. ] (]) 16:32, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
::::I have a bottle of what is described on the label as "100% Vegetable Glycerine". Could this be 5% water? ] (]) 16:38, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
:::::No. If it was 5% water, then it would be 95% glycerine. ] 17:32, 3 June 2023 (UTC)


== Glycerol Toxicity ==
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 03:41, 20 October 2017 (UTC)


The claim that it is "non-toxic" is apparently false. There are cases of glycerol toxicity in children who consume too much of it - typically in slushies (?) that use excessive glycerol (more than a typical recipe containing glycerol as a texture additive or sweetener substitute) to maintain a liquid state. Less info is available on whether it ever affects adults, but it has caused hypoglycemia and unresponsive unconsciousness in small children which is diagnosed as "glycerol toxicity" thereby indicating it is not in fact non-toxic. ] (]) 14:17, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
== Duplicated content ==


:Glycerin generally is considered non-toxic, with the word "toxic" generally reserved for poisons. Just about anything is bad for people if taken in excess. For example, water is typically considered to be the least toxic substance known, but even water can be overdosed on, which causes death very rapidly. (See: ]) Still, it's not a poison in the usual sense and in normal doses is considered non-toxic. Glycerin is similar. It probably wouldn't hurt to add some information on the possibility of overdosing on glycerin, but in general it's not a poison but a food substance, so I think describing it as non-toxic is still correct. ] (]) 18:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
The "Explosive" section is duplicated at the beginning of the "Chemical intermediate" section.
:: Glycerol doesn't meet any definition of toxic substance. Non-toxic does not mean non-harmful. If you consume oxygen, water, salt, sugar, or anything else, in excess it can result in injury. The LD50 of oral glycerol is >20g/kg, which is more than other common non-toxic substance like table salt. The therapeutic dose, when used as an osmotic diuretic, is 1.5g/kg per dose every 4h. For your standard 10kg 1 year old that is about two teaspoons (11ml) per dose (that is enough to cause a mild increase in urinary output). Rats given 10g/kg per day per year suffered no ill effects. Chronic exposure adverse effects are mostly due to its caloric effects--it is usually completely absorbed within 30 minutes of ingestion and is metabolized like simple sugars. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 19:49, 1 March 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

One of them should have the duplicated content deleted, possibly the bit in the chemical intermediate section as it seems more appropriate in the explosives section. ] (]) 10:22, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
==Allyl iodide==
Old, unlikely to be of broad interest, and pretty specialized so removed:
"<nowiki>], a chemical building block for ], ]s, ], and ], can be synthesized by using elemental ] and ] on glycerol.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Datta|first=Rasek Lal|title=The Preparation of Allyl Iodide|journal=Journal of the American Chemical Society|year=1914|volume=36|pages=1005–1007|doi=10.1021/ja02182a023|url=https://books.google.com/?id=BrI7AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA1005|issue=5}}</ref></nowiki>"--] (]) 14:42, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:50, 1 March 2024

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconChemicals High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPharmacology Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconFood and drink Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Food and Drink task list:
To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:
Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.
WikiProject iconMolecular Biology: MCB
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology
???This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).


Archives
Archive 1


This page has archives. Sections older than 183 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Moved comment to talk

--— Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.222.46 (talkcontribs) 11:29, 13 October 2010

Medical, et al, section

Claims there is no topical treatment for 3rd degree burns. Hmmm. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia's web-article on 3D burns claims in the treatment section that treatment may include "antibiotic creams or ointments" (which by definition are topical). The false or at least certainly misleading claim (misleading since AB treat or prevent infections subsequent to a 3DB rather than the damage itself, but since it is part of the treatment (in some cases) and aids in healing, that distinction is almost impossible to justify). This article is not about burns, and I suggest the false and quite unnecessary claim be removed.174.131.48.89 (talk) 08:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

You're correct. Someone must have misinterpreted the source, which at the end correctly says that no dressings have been approved for third-degree burns. The source, I might add, is a press release for a glycerin-based dressing for use in first and second-degree burns, but you can't dress a third-degree burn because that would be like putting a bandage on gangrene. The dead and dying tissue has to be removed and new skin grafted into place. But topical ointments and gels? Sure, those have to be used. So I say go ahead and remove the sentence. You can easily do that yourself. Just leave a little edit summary at the box at the bottom pointing people to this discussion. Zaereth (talk) 20:32, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted sentence claiming "no topical treatment" as discussed  • Bobsd •  (talk) 06:51, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Confusion about exact nature of glycerol and glycerin

It seems that according to this Misplaced Pages article, glycerin and glycerol are exactly the same thing and that glycerol is a viscous liquid. However, I have read somewhere that glycerin is actually 5% water. I have also been told by someone that pure glycerol is actually a powder. Does anyone here know the authoritative truth about these things? 95.172.233.137 (talk) 13:25, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Glycerol, glycerine and glycerin are synonyms. Pure glycerol is a sweet-tasting syrupy liquid at normal room temperature. Plantsurfer 13:42, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Thank you, Plantsurfer, very much for your reply.
What is your source for this information? 95.172.233.137 (talk) 15:18, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Glycerol. A good source for generic chem questions. --Smokefoot (talk) 15:28, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Pubchem is good, as Smokefoot said, but another source is https://www.britannica.com/science/glycerol Plantsurfer 16:06, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Thank you, Smokefoot and Plantsurfer, very much indeed for your very helpful replies. 95.172.233.137 (talk) 16:32, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
I have a bottle of what is described on the label as "100% Vegetable Glycerine". Could this be 5% water? 95.172.233.137 (talk) 16:38, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
No. If it was 5% water, then it would be 95% glycerine. Plantsurfer 17:32, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Glycerol Toxicity

The claim that it is "non-toxic" is apparently false. There are cases of glycerol toxicity in children who consume too much of it - typically in slushies (?) that use excessive glycerol (more than a typical recipe containing glycerol as a texture additive or sweetener substitute) to maintain a liquid state. Less info is available on whether it ever affects adults, but it has caused hypoglycemia and unresponsive unconsciousness in small children which is diagnosed as "glycerol toxicity" thereby indicating it is not in fact non-toxic. 97.68.70.242 (talk) 14:17, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Glycerin generally is considered non-toxic, with the word "toxic" generally reserved for poisons. Just about anything is bad for people if taken in excess. For example, water is typically considered to be the least toxic substance known, but even water can be overdosed on, which causes death very rapidly. (See: Water toxicity) Still, it's not a poison in the usual sense and in normal doses is considered non-toxic. Glycerin is similar. It probably wouldn't hurt to add some information on the possibility of overdosing on glycerin, but in general it's not a poison but a food substance, so I think describing it as non-toxic is still correct. Zaereth (talk) 18:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Glycerol doesn't meet any definition of toxic substance. Non-toxic does not mean non-harmful. If you consume oxygen, water, salt, sugar, or anything else, in excess it can result in injury. The LD50 of oral glycerol is >20g/kg, which is more than other common non-toxic substance like table salt. The therapeutic dose, when used as an osmotic diuretic, is 1.5g/kg per dose every 4h. For your standard 10kg 1 year old that is about two teaspoons (11ml) per dose (that is enough to cause a mild increase in urinary output). Rats given 10g/kg per day per year suffered no ill effects. Chronic exposure adverse effects are mostly due to its caloric effects--it is usually completely absorbed within 30 minutes of ingestion and is metabolized like simple sugars. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrKC MD (talkcontribs) 19:49, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Categories: