Misplaced Pages

talk:WikiProject Lithuania: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:17, 18 October 2006 editHalibutt (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers34,067 edits →List of users← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:41, 10 September 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,067 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Lithuania/Archive 3) (bot 
(553 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User:MiszaBot/config
'''New topic - new section please. It would be much easier to communicate and not mix things.'''
| algo = old(90d)
| archive = Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Lithuania/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 3
| maxarchivesize = 250K
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft = 4
}}
{{talk header|wp=yes|WT:LITHUANIA}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|
{{WikiProject Lithuania}}
}}
{{archives|bot=lowercase sigmabot III|age=90|list=
#]
#]
#]
}}


'''''New topic - new section please. It would be much easier to communicate and not mix things.'''''
== Lithuania-myth-stub ==


== GAR for Kaunas Fortress ==
IMO it is needed, because there are about 50-60 stubs, that in my opiniuon are deadends, and now they clog up Lithuania-stub place, and are only relatively related to it.--] 14:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
:Yes, that's one thing... I really believe all those stubs should be merged into one article/list because 95% of them are destined to be stubs forever (just there is no info about those reconstructed deities) and all of them have dubious claims. It would be much easier to find out any wrong statements in one big list than in 60 sub-stubs.
:If merged, mythology stub is not needed. ] 17:23, 2 August 2006 (UTC)


== Collaboration of the week == == Naming of ] ==


]
is it needed, will someone participate?--] 14:57, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
According to the 2001 subdivision of Kaunas, it has thee levels of subdivision:
:I believe it's a bit too early for that. First, let's get the whole project up and going. It's a good idea, but now right now and right here. Let's better think what is needed for the project to become alive? Here are some thoughts:
:Seniūnija -> Miesto dalys -> Miesto teritorijos
:# Category tree to explain/plan future categories
I noticed that various people at various times translated these terms variously, e.g., Seniūnija was either eldership or elderate, and don't even want to enumerate how 'dalys' and 'teritorija' were translated. Not to say about confusing interwikilinks of elderates vs 'dalys' which have the same name.
:# Article index - list of all existing articles about Lithuania and what needs to be done to them; at the same time articles could be assessed (stub-ok-featured; not important-very important). I might attempt to compile the list of articles (more or less from my watchlist)
:# Article talk template - "this article is part of WikiProject Lithuania" (btw, P in wikiproject is capitalized)
:# Compilation of missing articles
:# Comprehensive resource page
:That's just some basic ideas. ] 17:23, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
::also adding on going votes related with LT ]


I'd like to unify the translations across Misplaced Pages. What will be the consensus about translations? - ] ] 22:43, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
So this is next step:)
Anyone should free to edit/make this page structure better. For now it is as programmer call it - in early alpha. Altoug, I do have feeling it could become tool.
: sorry I still not see vote issue, could you please point me directly; I do not find it :)]
:: Discussions ... - if you need a separate section for vote add it, altough, IMO it would seem as a conspiracy untill this page is not official. We could mark this feature as a '' will be enabled out of beta''. Would this satisfy you? because i'm not so eager to vote, I've stated it before.--] 21:52, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
::: eee... I mean to notify editors which article related with LT is going a vote procedures like Jogaila was and etc. '' i'm not so eager to vote, I've stated it before.'' -sorry but I did not recall this your statement, maybe I missed some issues...] 21:58, 2 August 2006 (UTC)


== Good article reassessment for ] ==
== Category ==
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 17:09, 3 August 2024 (UTC)


== Women in Green's October 2024 edit-a-thon ==
Should we add <nowiki>]</nowiki> (or any othe category) to this, to be accessible by more editors or should we wait?--] 22:01, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
:There are many other things to do first. ] 11:21, 3 August 2006 (UTC)


<div style="border: 6px solid #2bbf08; background: #FFF; background-color:#FFFFFF; padding: 1ex 1ex 1ex 1.5ex; margin: 0px 0px 1em 1em; font-size: 99%">
==Tasks for the weekend==
]
So, let's decide what we are going to do over the weekend.
Hello WikiProject Lithuania:


''']''' is holding a ''' month-long ]'''!<br /><br />
First, I think, we need to decide if we want to do article assesment on quality (see, for example, {{tl|Grading scheme}}) and/or importance. See for example existing template on ]. Should we have one like that? If so, start developing rating standards, rating template, categories, etc.
Running from October 1 to 31, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme '''Around the World in 31 Days'''! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least '''31 countries''' (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.


We hope to see you there!
Second, start compiling a list of missing articles. Start with really important ones.
] (]) 11:54, 10 September 2024 (UTC)</div>

Third, since Lokyz seems to be the most involved with categories, you could make some sort of category tree to show existing categories and categories that might be needed. (btw, to link a category, you should put : in front of the word category. example: ]) ] 11:21, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

:Assessment is good thing, just IMO it's a bit early to think about it. Importance - yes, it would be really helpful to make important articles better, also template indicating that this article belongs to WP:LIT is good thing (or should we wait until this WP will get official status?).
:I just dunno how much time I'll have on weekend, so can't promise a lot, but I hope I'll participate.
Should we create a subpage for requested articles and/or turorial and/or references?----] 13:16, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

== Persondata ==

Should we use this ] ? It is stated it's for automated collection of data for Misplaced Pages.--] 21:27, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

==Images==

Maybe we should build some sort of Lithuania related image data base? ] 21:32, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

:It would be great. Added image request section.--] 21:46, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

::Um, simpliest way would to properly inventorize/categorize whatever images are on commons, here and on lt wiki. Easiest way - transfer all free images on commons. ] 22:28, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

::: That's what M.K was talking about - not create separate, just to collect into commons a propper amount of pitures to use both in Lithuanian and English version of Misplaced Pages.--] 22:38, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
btw what is procedure to upload alredy existing in EN or LT etc. wiks. pictures in comm.? Does another editor could do it (not 1 editor, who uploaded these images)?

maybe we need and some sort ''Articles needing copy/edit'' also? it would be very handy at least to mine articales for sure :P ] 10:35, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

one more note, near article which, is in the Requests for article part, to avoid collision when two editors work on same articles, we should sign near the article who will take to write about it e.g. in the list- is request for Kolduneliai - I have appropriate info etc. so I will take it and near the name Kolduneliai I sing to inform others that I will work on this issue. ] 21:54, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

:Re: images. I created category ] so please "dump" all images there. When uploading an image from EN or LT to commons you need to give as much info as possible on the original uploader. See for example this ] uploaded by Knutux to commons from Lithuanian WP where it was uploaded by Algirdas. ] 21:33, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
::so what we should do with remaining old images when they are placed in comm. tag with speed del. or just leave in one peace?

==Restructure==
I did some work. IMO it looks much better now (what do you think?), but I am not quite done with resources part. So hold on, I just run out of time. ] 15:31, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
:So I moved it myself... We are official now :) And of course, help make ] beter so it can pass GA nomination. ] 16:39, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
:: GA issue should be the '''top importance'' matter now to us! ] 09:49, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

== AK ==

M.K added suggestion to look for references to Armia Krajowa article, but it is rather political, and '''calm head''' recommended. No need to start another one WW on this issue. At this state article is rather acceptable and allmost balanced thanks to Piotrus. No need to spoil this balance. So evaluate sources ''very'' carefully.--] 10:29, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

==WPBS==
Please join WikiProject:Baltic States by going to ]. ] '''''] ''''' <sub>]</sub> 14:36, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

==Userbox==
We need a userbox. ] '''''] ''''' <sub>]</sub> 14:37, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

I'd add we need Template.--] 14:56, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

:I am against a userbox. Talk page template is the first thing on my to-do this weekend. ] 17:04, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
::I'll make one, I guess. ] '''''] ''''' <sub>]</sub> 17:11, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
:Userbox is redundant. No need for it, unless someone just can't live without toys.--] 19:37, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
::That's me. :P ] '''''] ''''' <sub>]</sub> 19:43, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Ok: So create at least 5 decent Lithuania related stubs, and then we'll discuss this issue(later)--] 19:58, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
:Ok, I'll do it tommorrow when I have time. ] '''''] ''''' <sub>]</sub> 20:11, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
::]. I'll do the rest later. ] '''''] ''''' <sub>]</sub> 15:15, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
::Are you still going to do the userbox? If not, I wouldn't mind giving it a shot... '''<font color="Gold">]</font><font color="DarkGreen">]</font><font color="Crimson">]</font><font color="Black">]</font>''' <sup>]</sup> 19:28, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Ok, I have created one at ]:
{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Lithuania/Userbox}}
] 04:15, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
:Sweet! Thanks. ] '''''] ''''' <sub>]</sub> 14:06, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

==Welcome==
BTW, we need to modify {{tl|welcome}} to Lithuanian users, to invite them to the project, etc. ] 11:19, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

==featured picture ==
Maybe we should add featured picture related with Lithuania?? ] 18:56, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
:Portal Lithuania might be OK, but there are not enough of pictures. So everyone march to the store and buy yourself a fotocamera:)--] 19:11, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

== Pro memoria ==

Some people just go, therefore IMO it would be great to remember them and to say at least a few words by creating at least some stub. I happened once to be a pupil of ] and I think He deserves to be mentioned in this great enciclopedia.] 23:33, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

== Lithuania Music stub ? ==

Who created this witout a request <nowiki>{{Lithuania-music-stub}}</nowiki>? For stub categories there are strict rules, and they should be requested, not created at will.--] 15:33, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
:sorry, that was me. ] '''''] ''''' <sub>]</sub> 22:37, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
no need to be angry to Hurricane, he/<s>she</s> just wanted to help! ] 13:44, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
:He. ] '''''] ''''' <sub>]</sub> 16:48, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
:I hope you don`t leave this project, do you? ]
::I'm not gonna leave. ] '''''] ''''' <sub>]</sub> 19:04, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

==Assessment==
Ok, guys, we have some serious work to do. I have just finished creating ]. What you need to do is to take {{tl|WikiProject Lithuania}} and paste it on talk pages of Lithuania-related articles. Add quality and importance ratings as per assesment guidelines. Short version is presented bellow. Please leave comments on what should be improved to reach better quality rating. Also, if the article is 1-3 sentences in length add ''substub=yes''. Pretty simple really. See ] for example. Questions? :)

(Stolen from Mathematics Wikiproject)
{| class="wikitable"
|{{FA-Class}}|| Featured article
|-
|{{A-Class}}||Article is well written, reasonably complete and referenced; possible ] candidate.
|-
|{{GA-Class}}|| This is a ]
|-
|{{B-Class}}|| We have a decent article, but it needs further editing
|-
|{{Start-Class}}|| Significant cleanup or expansion needed.
|-
|{{Stub-Class}}|| Article is miserable or a stub.
|}

(Stolen from India WikiProject)
{| class="wikitable"
|+ '''Need:''' A measure of an subject's importance, '''regardless''' of its quality
|-
|{{Top-importance}} {{tl|top-importance}}
|Subject is a must-have for a print encyclopedia.
|-
|{{High-importance}} {{tl|high-importance}}
|Subject is exceptionally important.
|-
|{{Mid-importance}} {{tl|mid-importance}}
|Subject contributes a depth of knowledge.
|-
|{{Low-importance}} {{tl|low-importance}}
|Subject fills in important details.
|}

] 16:46, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
:Isn't GA supposed to be #ccffcc? ] '''''] ''''' <sub>]</sub> 16:47, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
::Dunno, not really important. Changed to {{tl|GA-Class}}. ] 16:51, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
:::So, say for example right now I'm filling all the red links in ], should I put the template in the new articles? And what importance would those stubs be? '''<font color="Gold">]</font><font color="DarkGreen">]</font><font color="Crimson">]</font><font color="Black">]</font>''' <sup>]</sup> 23:41, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
::::The template goes on the talk page. Importance does '''not''' depend on quality. For cities, I would use population/political status as indication of importance. Say, 10 county capitals are top importance, other 50 municipality capitals are high importance, other cities are mid importance and cities with population with less than 2000 is low importance. That's rough guide, feel free to disagree. ] 00:18, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Have question. Do you personally should add and rate this on your '''own''' written articles or you should wait for other person to do so as ''third side''? ] 14:55, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
:i see nothing too wrong about rating yourown articles. ] 18:47, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
If article is FA this means you have to rank it as FA also? ] 17:38, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
:Yes. GA too. Those are deternimed by the community. (Well, some GA could be A-class) ] 18:47, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

==Articles that need attention==

Somehow I think this section ''Articles that need attention'' should be placed several positions on top, if not the main one. ]


==Top Priority==

Since Lithuania is now a GA, what's gonna be the top priority? '''<font color="Gold">]</font><font color="DarkGreen">]</font><font color="Crimson">]</font><font color="Black">]</font>''' <sup>]</sup> 13:42, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Let's just finish filling up list of cities?--] 06:17, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

== Icon for footieclub stub ==

Shouldn't we do something outstanding and for Lithuanian football club stub use a bit different icon than in eurofootie stub? Any proposals are welcome.--] 06:17, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

== Navigation box ==

do we nedd something like this ]?
:I don't like it. Not needed clutter. ] 10:53, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

==Cities are done!==
Bravo! All the city articles have been created! The two people we really have to thank is Lokyz and Andrius. Way to go guys! <small>Now let's un-stub them!</small>:) ] 23:37, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

==]==
This article is miserable... and we should clean it up. First we need to break it down to smaller periods. I porpose something like this:
# History of Lithuania (before 1218)
# History of Lithuania (1218-1377) → not 1385 because the whole of Jogaila belongs to Kreva
# History of Lithuania (1377-1569)
# History of Lithuania (1569-1795)
# History of Lithuania (1795-1918)
# History of Lithuania (1918-1945)
# History of Lithuania (1945-1989)
# History of Lithuania (since 1989)
Objections? ] 13:23, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

nope, just all the articles would be very small... Probably we should work on categories as well, split it into smaller parts.--] 13:29, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

:Huh? (the first part). Categories can wait. ] 14:04, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
:I'd suggest to add section History of Lithuania (1939-1945)--] 19:54, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
::See my first half of #2 at ]. Comments welcome! ] 16:32, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
:Another one idea - prehistoric Lithuania-1009, then mythical Lithuania 1009-1218 --] 22:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

:Such subarticles worked very well for the ].--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 15:33, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

==Minister ]==

I'd suggest that we create one article (probably two (three) - interwar period, and again independent Lithuania (by third I mean Lithuanian SSR also deserves mentioning as being specific form of government)). And if a need emerges, split it into more specific articles (be it the 1st or the 11th). not sure whether separate articles for ministers are needed. (Maybe joint- minister/ministerium would be useful). Or at least list for a start - every list encourages anyone who visits it to fill red links:)
Another one suggestion - reserve ] for current cabinet,and use ] to access former cabinets. (A little evaluation of cabinet's deeds would be useful, don't you think?)
Also list of ministeries would help. --] 14:19, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

:First of, it should be ] as per ]. ] 01:57, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

==] for your wikiproject!==
First, let me congratulate you all on this splending WikiProject, something which I will want to emulate with the creation of Polish WikiProject and would greatly appreciate any advice or help ].--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 15:33, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

== Interesting video ==

Thought this might be of interest to some people - a video on Google Video consisting of nazi, soviet propaganda, videos of war (WWII), and basically an overwiew of Lithuanian occupation. . BTW, it's 54 minutes long. '''<font color="Gold">]</font><font color="DarkGreen">]</font><font color="Crimson">]</font><font color="Black">]</font>''' <sup>]</sup> 21:29, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
::Really cool! Thanks, Andrius! ] 21:51, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
:::Another video (unrelated to the previous one) - this is a video of the ] , should it go into the external links of the Baltic Way article? '''<font color="DarkGreen">]</font>''' 20:45, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

== Moved out ==
Guys, if you are missing your discussions "let's be friends": see ]. Please keep this talk directly related to the project itself and for planning of present and future collaborations. Thank you. ] 03:45, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

==Reorganize==
I just moved new article announcements to new sub-pages for cleaner look and less clutter. Add these two to your watchlists: ] & ]. ] 04:18, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

==Towns==

:Maybe we should categorize towns/vllages not by county but by district (and these by counties)? This would be more appropriate IMO.--] 16:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
::I think it's over-categorizing. Counties work just fine right now. ] 16:30, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

==Naming of towns==

:''The discussion in this section has been moved to ]''

==Tagging talk pages and assessing articles==
]
Hi. If you still have work to do tagging talk pages and assessing articles, my ] might be of interest to you.

The plugin has two main modes of operation:
*Tagging talk pages, great for high-speed tagging
*Assessments mode, for reviewing articles (pictured)

As of the current version, WikiProjects with simple "generic" templates are supported by the plugin without the need for any special programatic support by me. I've had a look at your project's template and you seem to qualify.

For more information see:
*]
*]
*]
*]

Hope that helps. If you have any questions or find any bugs please let me know on the ]. --] 13:54, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

==]==

Do we need this? ] 20:53, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

:], ], ] (rather a bunker, not fort), ], what more ? --]<sup>]</sup> 20:59, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
:: Vilnius (+-) ] 21:06, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
:Probably the category would be rather empty, unless we describe individual objects of Molotov line, which will probably not happen soon ... On the other hand, e.g. ] has only 3 articles so far (of course there are many more forts in PL than 3). How about ] ? --]<sup>]</sup> 21:12, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
::plus nine forts in Kaunas could be impressive number if not merge to Kaunas Fortress as one ]
:::... if you'll write these articles :-) --]<sup>]</sup> 21:18, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
::: Some day I will for sure :) ] 21:19, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

==]==

How about this ? There are plenty of hill-forts in Lithuania, each has its own story and deserves an article. --]<sup>]</sup> 07:24, 24 September 2006 (UTC)



==Assessment2==

When placing just {{tl|WikiProject Lithuania}} I cant assess and reassess the article, any suggestions? {{Unsigned|M.K}}

:Take a look at ]. --]<sup>]</sup> 13:53, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
:: Take a look at ] ] 14:11, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
::As I understand you just copy/paste expanded syntax code? ] 14:55, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
:::Yes, this is the syntax. --]<sup>]</sup> 15:06, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

== ] ==

I think more Lithuanian eyes are needed at ] where ] is alone, discussing with 3 Polish editors. It's not a revert-war situation but some comments, particularly on Lithuanian sources (mostly unknown outside Lithuania) could be helpful. --]<sup>]</sup> 11:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

== List of users ==

Hello there. Shouldn't we create a list of users that are allowed to add articles to the list? I thought that anyone is allowed to add them, but my latest addition had been reverted on sight with a comment accusing me of trolling. So, whom should I send the links to the articles I create with a plea to add them here? ''<font color="#901">//</font>'']] 09:49, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

:This here is on the verge of trolling, actually --]<sup>]</sup> 10:56, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
::All right then, I withdraw my comment then. Yet, should Polish editors act the same way on the Polish list? ''<font color="#901">//</font>'']] 11:17, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:41, 10 September 2024

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Lithuania and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
Shortcut
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconLithuania
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania

Archives
  1. 2006–2007
  2. 2008–2015
  3. 2015–

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

New topic - new section please. It would be much easier to communicate and not mix things.

GAR for Kaunas Fortress

Naming of subdivisions of Kaunas

According to the 2001 subdivision of Kaunas, it has thee levels of subdivision:

Seniūnija -> Miesto dalys -> Miesto teritorijos

I noticed that various people at various times translated these terms variously, e.g., Seniūnija was either eldership or elderate, and don't even want to enumerate how 'dalys' and 'teritorija' were translated. Not to say about confusing interwikilinks of elderates vs 'dalys' which have the same name.

I'd like to unify the translations across Misplaced Pages. What will be the consensus about translations? - Altenmann >talk 22:43, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for First Partition of Poland

First Partition of Poland has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:09, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Women in Green's October 2024 edit-a-thon

Hello WikiProject Lithuania:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2024!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Grnrchst (talk) 11:54, 10 September 2024 (UTC) Categories: