| Revision as of 22:08, 27 February 2018 editNarky Blert (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers417,471 edits →A link to a DAB page: Reply← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:08, 1 January 2025 edit undoZ1720 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators29,824 edits →Good article reassessment for Alfred North Whitehead: new sectionTag: New topic | ||
| (824 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{WikiProject banner shell| | |||
| {{/header}} | |||
| {{WikiProject Philosophy}} | |||
| }} | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Signpost article link for WikiProjects|link=Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2011-07-25/WikiProject report|writer= ] ||day =25|month=July|year=2011}} | |||
| <!---- | |||
| {| width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" valign="top" | |||
| | | |||
| |- | |||
| | style="background-color:#FFFFFF" valign="top" | | |||
| {| width="100%" style="background-color:#FFFFFF; padding:5px;" cellspacing="5" valign="top"| | |||
| |- | |||
| | style="background-color:#FFFFFF;padding:0px" valign="top" | | |||
| <div align="center"> | |||
| <p style="clear:both; margin:0 3px .8em 3px; font-variant: small-caps; text-align: center; margin-top: 0; margin-bottom:.2em; font-size: 105%;"><!-- These should be most useful links for philosophy editors | |||
| ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] </p> | |||
| </div> | |||
| {| class="plainlinks" | |||
| | colspan="2" valign="middle" style="width: 100%; border: 1px silver solid; background-color:#FFD699; padding: 1em;" | | |||
| {{Shortcut|WT:PHILO|WT:PHIL}} | |||
| <center><big>'''Philosophy Noticeboard'''</big></center> | |||
| This is the central discussion area for ]. Feel free to discuss any topics relating to philosophy here. It is recommended that members this page. | |||
| |- | |||
| |} | |||
| ---> | |||
| <includeonly>]</includeonly> | |||
| <noinclude>{{oldmfd | date = 21 January 2013 | result = Withdrawn by nominator | votepage = Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Philosophy/header}}</noinclude> | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |archiveheader = {{aan}} | |archiveheader = {{aan}} | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 100K | |maxarchivesize = 100K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 24 | ||
| |algo = old(60d) | |algo = old(60d) | ||
| |archive = Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Philosophy/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Philosophy/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{archives|root=Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Philosophy|search=yes|auto=short}} | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/WikiProject used|link=Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2011-07-25/WikiProject report|writer= ] ||day =25|month=July|year=2011}} | |||
| == FAC of Metaphysics == | |||
| The article ] is currently a candidate for featured article status. So far, there has been little response, so I was wondering whether some of the editors here are inclined to review the article or comment on it. The nomination page can be found at ]. For a short FAQ of the FA reviewing process, see ]. ] (]) 10:21, 8 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Addition of link to ] to the article ] == | |||
| Ciao fellow editors in the Philosophy Project! I have initiated a discussion on a proposed addition of text referring to the work of the modern philosopher ] | |||
| within the article ] --specifically in reference to his contributions to the field of ] and the search for ] through the use and misuse of ]. Several reliable and credible sources have been provided from various international journals, Google Books, Google Scholar and JSTOR=-- all of which review his work in considerable technical detail within a specialized philosophical niche. Perhaps a participant in the Philosophy Project could participate in the discussion to delete the proposed text since it references several technical ] themes which might require the insights of an expert. | |||
| :You can add your contribution to the discussion on the talk page ] Thanks in advance for your help. Respectfully ] (]) 20:33, 12 November 2024 (UTC)GCL | |||
| ::O.K. Thanks for the tip.] (]) 20:47, 15 November 2024 (UTC)PWL | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 16:16, 16 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Looking for epistemiologist ] == | |||
| The notability of ] is being discussed in its talk page. If somebody has some evidence of the notability of her work in philosophy (epistemiology) please consider joining the conservation. ] (]) 16:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Peer review of ] == | |||
| I was hoping to get some feedback on the article ] to prepare it for a ]. The peer review can found at ]. ] (]) 17:16, 26 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Seeking for a consensus regarding the "philosophical pessimism" template == | |||
| Greetings, all. | |||
| The user "Paranakyaa" has recently argued against me in these edits (https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Template:Philosophical_pessimism&action=history) that many of the links to the template "philosophical pessimism" should be in red merely because they do not have a Misplaced Pages article still existing for them. | |||
| I, on the other hand, tried to argue against them by stating that such red links are unnecessary and make the template look aesthetically unpleasant. | |||
| After that, he appealed to the supposed fact there is a "consensus" that such links should be red (https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Categories,_lists,_and_navigation_templates#Navigation_templates). | |||
| I still maintain my original position, but have no further intent nor energy to engage in any kind of "edit war" with them. If there is still no Misplaced Pages article existing for these works, the fact that they are not dyed in the color blue already indicates this; there is no need to make so many works in the template dyed in the color red. | |||
| I am curious as to other users think about this. Please do share your opinion so that we might, in fact, reach a "consensus". ] (]) 15:51, 27 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| <blockquote>'''Unreferenced and unimproved almost 15 years. Spam bucket. Vandal bait. Not enough information to merge, and no obvious targets for a redirect. Delete and salt, please.'''</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) ] (]) 00:53, 10 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> to the article ] has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 14#You lose}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 03:32, 14 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | == Notability of ] == | ||
| Was he notable enough that he should have a separate page on his works at ], which was recently created by ]. I have seen these for nobel laureates, but I feel as part of ] this question should be asked. I will also post to psychology. ] (]) 14:58, 14 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Any philosophical insight that would be useful for the improvement of ] would be appreciated. Cheers! ] ] 19:12, 22 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Requested move at ] == | |||
| == Missing topic == | |||
| ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] 07:00, 15 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Merge proposal for discussion == | |||
| When researching ], I came across the idea that ]s are ] beings. However, I do not see this anywhere on Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 09:56, 14 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
| There is an ongoing ] for ] into ] that may concern collaborators of this WikiProject. ] (]) 05:37, 16 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Unity in diversity == | |||
| == Need help disambiguating several "Mental object"-esque articles == | |||
| Could I get some feedback on ]? Sometime back in April 2017 the page was significantly altered to state that "Unity in diversity" was merely a political motto, but I feel like there's a good case for it being more of an overarching philosophical concept—even if the phrase itself is sometimes used as a slogan. The Lalonde ref on that page mentions that the concept was current in Taoist societies as well as in Ancient Greece, but all I've been able to find so far was its treatment by ] and his followers. Would anyone else have any leads on good sources to expand this article? ''']'''_<span style="font-size:70%">]</span><span style="font-size:70%;vertical-align:top">]</span> 15:04, 19 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
| Currently "Mental object" redirects to ], which seems to be a philosophy-related stub. However, there are several articles that seem to be talking about roughly the same concept, and I'm not sure why these are all seperate: | |||
| ==]== | |||
| I just put together a biography of this German-born Hegelian, who seems like he was important in the early history of Hegel in America and of the "St. Louis Movement". If anyone wants to look it over and maybe find something better to say about his impact, that would be great. Anyways, there is at least something on him now. ] (]) 19:19, 19 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
| * ] | |||
| == ] needs your help == | |||
| * ] | |||
| ] is overly essay-like and needs more citations to sources. | |||
| * ] | |||
| Would anyone here care to review and improve this article? | |||
| and possibly | |||
| Thanks -- ] (]) 15:28, 1 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
| * ] | |||
| == Topics in Metaphysics == | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| "Mental world" seems like It should be more about a representation of reality, rather than an individual object. | |||
| Someone has been repeatedly removing much of the content of the article ] listing the central topics of the field (in a structure closely mirroring other authoritative sources like SEP) citing poor referencing for those being within the domain of metaphysics. Some other editors' attention there would be appreciated. --] (]) 18:54, 5 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
| So, for a start, I think "Mental object" redirect should be changed to "Object of the mind", which I can go ahead and do. But other than that, I think there needs to be some discussion about clarifying what these articles are about, adding {{Template link|About}}/{{Template link|For}} hatnotes to each of the articles to clarify their distinction, and possibly merging some. | |||
| == Critique of Pure Reason == | |||
| Sidenote: It seems reasonable that ] might be interested in this discussion. I might make a post there directing here. ] (]) 03:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hello. I have a dispute with Διοτιμα at the article ]. I have attempted to engage with this user and discuss the dispute at the article's talk page. He has, however, ignored me. I would welcome any comments on the issue, whatever they are, from editors interested in philosophy. ] (]) 20:08, 17 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :This user has also tampered with ]. Their latest additions seem to be a personal interpretation of '']''. --] (]) 00:44, 20 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::Hello, ]. I would appreciate it if you could comment about the dispute on the talk page of the article ]. There is a similar dispute at ] that you might also want to comment on. To be completely explicit about it, I am not asking you or other editors to agree with me. I welcome your comments whatever they are. ] (]) 20:49, 25 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ==A link to a DAB page== | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 15:17, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ] contains a link to the DAB page ] which has me baffled. Can any expert here help solve the problem? ] (]) 15:16, 27 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| : Pien refers to the concept of gradual transformation in Confucian or Taoist philosophy; see for instance ]. --] (]) 18:44, 27 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 23:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :: {{ping|Mark viking}} In that case, can you repair that bad link, and perhaps also update the DAB page? I don't feel competent to do so. ] (]) 22:07, 27 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:08, 1 January 2025
 | This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | WikiProject Philosophy was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 25 July 2011. |
 | This page was nominated for deletion on 21 January 2013. The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by nominator. |
 Archives |
|
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
FAC of Metaphysics
The article Metaphysics is currently a candidate for featured article status. So far, there has been little response, so I was wondering whether some of the editors here are inclined to review the article or comment on it. The nomination page can be found at Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Metaphysics/archive1. For a short FAQ of the FA reviewing process, see here. Phlsph7 (talk) 10:21, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Addition of link to Colin Murray Turbayne to the article Truth
Ciao fellow editors in the Philosophy Project! I have initiated a discussion on a proposed addition of text referring to the work of the modern philosopher Colin Murray Turbayne within the article Truth --specifically in reference to his contributions to the field of epistemology and the search for objective truth through the use and misuse of metaphor. Several reliable and credible sources have been provided from various international journals, Google Books, Google Scholar and JSTOR=-- all of which review his work in considerable technical detail within a specialized philosophical niche. Perhaps a participant in the Philosophy Project could participate in the discussion to delete the proposed text since it references several technical Epistemological themes which might require the insights of an expert.
- You can add your contribution to the discussion on the talk page Talk:Truth Thanks in advance for your help. Respectfully 160.72.81.86 (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2024 (UTC)GCL
- O.K. Thanks for the tip.68.129.171.69 (talk) 20:47, 15 November 2024 (UTC)PWL
Good article reassessment for Consciousness
Consciousness has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:16, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
Looking for epistemiologist Mioara Mugur-Schächter
The notability of Mioara Mugur-Schächter is being discussed in its talk page. If somebody has some evidence of the notability of her work in philosophy (epistemiology) please consider joining the conservation. ReyHahn (talk) 16:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Peer review of Mind
I was hoping to get some feedback on the article Mind to prepare it for a featured article candidacy. The peer review can found at Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Mind/archive1. Phlsph7 (talk) 17:16, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Seeking for a consensus regarding the "philosophical pessimism" template
Greetings, all.
The user "Paranakyaa" has recently argued against me in these edits (https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Template:Philosophical_pessimism&action=history) that many of the links to the template "philosophical pessimism" should be in red merely because they do not have a Misplaced Pages article still existing for them.
I, on the other hand, tried to argue against them by stating that such red links are unnecessary and make the template look aesthetically unpleasant.
After that, he appealed to the supposed fact there is a "consensus" that such links should be red (https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Categories,_lists,_and_navigation_templates#Navigation_templates).
I still maintain my original position, but have no further intent nor energy to engage in any kind of "edit war" with them. If there is still no Misplaced Pages article existing for these works, the fact that they are not dyed in the color blue already indicates this; there is no need to make so many works in the template dyed in the color red.
I am curious as to other users think about this. Please do share your opinion so that we might, in fact, reach a "consensus". Alice793 (talk) 15:51, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Universal dialectic
The article Universal dialectic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unreferenced and unimproved almost 15 years. Spam bucket. Vandal bait. Not enough information to merge, and no obvious targets for a redirect. Delete and salt, please.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) Bearian (talk) 00:53, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
"You lose" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect You lose to the article Godwin's law has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 14 § You lose until a consensus is reached. 67.209.128.30 (talk) 03:32, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Notability of Jean Laplanche
Was he notable enough that he should have a separate page on his works at Jean Laplanche bibliography, which was recently created by Honigfrau. I have seen these for nobel laureates, but I feel as part of WP:NPP this question should be asked. I will also post to psychology. Ldm1954 (talk) 14:58, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Subjectivity and objectivity (philosophy)#Requested move 7 December 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Subjectivity and objectivity (philosophy)#Requested move 7 December 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 07:00, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Merge proposal for discussion
There is an ongoing merge proposal for Statement (logic) into Proposition that may concern collaborators of this WikiProject. Tule-hog (talk) 05:37, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
Need help disambiguating several "Mental object"-esque articles
Currently "Mental object" redirects to Mental world, which seems to be a philosophy-related stub. However, there are several articles that seem to be talking about roughly the same concept, and I'm not sure why these are all seperate:
and possibly
"Mental world" seems like It should be more about a representation of reality, rather than an individual object.
So, for a start, I think "Mental object" redirect should be changed to "Object of the mind", which I can go ahead and do. But other than that, I think there needs to be some discussion about clarifying what these articles are about, adding {{About}}/{{For}} hatnotes to each of the articles to clarify their distinction, and possibly merging some.
Sidenote: It seems reasonable that WikiProject Psychology might be interested in this discussion. I might make a post there directing here. Farkle Griffen (talk) 03:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Teleological argument
Teleological argument has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:17, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Alfred North Whitehead
Alfred North Whitehead has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Categories: