| Revision as of 17:04, 15 March 2018 editBishonen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators80,275 edits Discretionary sanctions for pages regarding gun controlTag: contentious topics alert← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:37, 19 November 2024 edit undoPackMecEng (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers11,501 edits OneClickArchived "Antifa" to User talk:PackMecEng/Archive 6 | ||
| (875 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Archive basics | {{Archive basics | ||
| |archive = User talk:PackMecEng/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:PackMecEng/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 6 | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{archive box|auto=yes}} | {{archive box|auto=yes}} | ||
| == Invitation to participate in a research == | |||
| == Meme == | |||
| Hello, | |||
| There's nothing in the text that calls Carlson "racist". Please don't use misleading edit summaries.] (]) 14:52, 12 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Volunteer Marek}}No your right, it does not say Carlson is a racist. It says Carlson promoted this thing (he didn't) and this thing is like super racist... ] (]) 15:04, 12 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::Which he did. So what's the problem? ] (]) 16:07, 12 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :::{{Reply to|Volunteer Marek}}You don't see why that is a problem? Also the ADL source used is trash and should not be used for such statements against a BLP. ] (]) 16:09, 12 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Nonsense. ADL is quite reliable.] (]) 16:11, 12 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::::And no, I don't see why following reliable source is a problem. What is the problem? ] (]) 16:12, 12 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :::::{{Reply to|Volunteer Marek}}ADL is reliable yes, ADL blog post is not reliable. Big difference. The problem is the inference we are making combing the two sources to make a statement neither one individually made. ] (]) 17:06, 12 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Just for clarification is the ADL blog post I was refering to that was used in the article. ] (]) 17:09, 12 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
| The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''. | |||
| ==Colt AR-15== | |||
| I won't hold your inexperience against you, but you completely misunderstood the point . The edit requests on the talk page are about adding a section called "uses", and that's not what I was doing. Thank you! ] (]) 02:22, 18 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Drmies}} No worries, but you should read the opposes above your post. They all indicate opposition to '''any''' mass shooting information. ] (]) 02:24, 18 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::Well, that's Soviet-style dogmatism then, isn't it? What an odd kind of whitewashing--surely readers of Misplaced Pages who hear on the radio or on TV about the AR-15 will be educated by our article, and will actually come looking for that kind of information. Odd. Didn't think that such editors would support censorship. ] (]) 02:26, 18 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :::{{Reply to|Drmies}} While I understand your feels on the subject, perhaps making your case and getting consensus would be the least disruptive route given the edit warring the past few days on the article. Clams of censorship and whitewashing is not the best way to get your point across nor give you the right to act against obvious consensus. ] (]) 02:30, 18 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::::"Feels"? Sorry, I'm 49. "Feelings"? I am not sure you understand my feelings, which are irrelevant at any rate. There is no consensus against ''explaining'' the nomenclatural confusion regarding the term "AR-15". Surely you saw that 350,000 people visited the article after the massacre committed by someone with one of those guns. Sorry to sound old, but I don't need to be patronized by someone with 1/75th the number of article edits on this project--sorry. ] (]) 02:42, 18 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :::::{{Reply to|Drmies}} Regardless I have started a discussion on the talk page and it can go from there. I saw you already commented there so that's a good start {{(:}} have a great night! ] (]) 02:46, 18 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::I saw that--thanks! ] (]) 02:51, 18 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
| You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. | |||
| == Trump poll == | |||
| The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] . | |||
| Hi thanks for tending to this. I think it's still not clear to newcomers. I suggest copying both versions of the language and doing an A / B or something similar. By the time we have a dozen contributors !votes, these polls keep going off track. ]] 15:01, 6 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|SPECIFICO}} You are a pain in the butt, you know that? But it is a good suggestion and I will update the poll. Thanks {{wink}} ] (]) 15:05, 6 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::Cool. It's American Politics that is our nemesis. Thanks for your contributions! ]] 16:07, 6 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
| {{Ping|SPECIFICO}} Uh-oh are they going to start another request move? Those are painful =/ ] (]) 21:36, 6 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
| Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. | |||
| ==Discretionary sanctions for pages regarding gun control== | |||
| {{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.'' | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| '''Please carefully read this information:''' | |||
| ] | |||
| The ] has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ]. | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. ] | ] 17:04, 15 March 2018 (UTC). | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Potential_Admins&oldid=27650229 --> | |||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| </div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1258243594 --> | |||
Latest revision as of 22:37, 19 November 2024
 Archives |
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)