Revision as of 22:29, 23 October 2006 edit63.17.61.40 (talk) You are Smart!← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 05:40, 5 March 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
(902 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-30 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-User talk:David D./Archive7 --> | |||
{|align="center" style="border-top: solid 1px #AAAAAA;border-right: solid 1px #AAAAAA;border-bottom: solid 2px #666666;border-left: solid 2px #666666; background-color: lavender;" | {|align="center" style="border-top: solid 1px #AAAAAA;border-right: solid 1px #AAAAAA;border-bottom: solid 2px #666666;border-left: solid 2px #666666; background-color: lavender;" | ||
|colspan="2"|{{User:Daycd/TalkTemp}} | |colspan="2"|{{User:Daycd/TalkTemp}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
|{{User:David_D./talktemp}} | |{{User:David_D./talktemp}} | ||
|rowspan="2"| |
|rowspan="2"| | ||
|- | |- | ||
|{{User:David_D./newmessage}} | |{{User:David_D./newmessage}} | ||
|} | |} | ||
== Atulsnishchal == | |||
== One more vote for the coordinator of the Molecular and Cellular Biology Wikiproject == | |||
I noticed that you had unblocked Atul on a "trial basis". Please look into his recent canvassing in 7 unrelated talk pages about certain wikipedia articles, and his call-to-action directed towards certain religious adherents. Not to mention his message was extremely POV in religious lines. | |||
Since two of the three editors nominated for Coordinator of the MCB Wikiproject ], one more vote has been posted: should the remaining nominee, ClockworkSoul, be named as the coordinator, or should nominations be reopened? Every opinion counts, so ]! – ]] 17:46, 17 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Thanks. --] (]) 06:53, 20 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Thank you == | |||
:I would also like to add that, this user admitted to using an anon IP to continue his disruptive edits while his account was banned, (that IP itself was blocked due to disruptive edits). The IP in question is 99.235.98.169, and the user admits to using this IP . --] (]) 07:58, 20 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
My administratorship candidacy succeeded with a final tally of 81/0/1. I appreciate your early support. Results are at ]. Warmly, ''']''' 21:01, 17 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
:Well I cant help it Ragib if you continually think I have bad faith, In my unblock request i mentioned I used this IP. , this is if you genuinely think i have bad faith etc. ] (]) 08:14, 20 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Thank You David == | |||
::I knew about the IP. I unblocked you anyway thinking you might turn over a new leaf. Collaborate, wikipedia is not a war and its not about who can recruit the largest army. ] ] 16:03, 21 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
Thank you, the new image code on ] is just excellent! It really fits to the template; as this template entry is labeled "Logo", I got a question: Shall I better use a photo like ] or a logo like ]? And do you have any idea to fix the font size bug? --] 10:34, 19 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
*By the way, isn't frame better than thumb? (because of the line breaking window symbol) --] 10:36, 19 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
*Hi again, I got a third idea: I recently discovered a bug when using a line break inside the motto variable causing the fat text no longer to be fat... a solution? --] 10:39, 19 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Happy Holidays == | |||
==]== | |||
This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above. | |||
] (]) 06:57, 25 December 2008 (UTC)]] | |||
{{Userlinks|PrivateEditor}}and {{Userlinks|Rootology}} are banned indefinitely from Misplaced Pages. No action is taken against MONGO for any excessive zeal he has displayed. Links to Encyclopædia Dramatica may be removed wherever found on Misplaced Pages as may material imported from it. Users who insert links to Encyclopædia Dramatica or who copy material from it here may be blocked for an appropriate period of time. Care should be taken to warn naive users before blocking. Strong penalties may be applied to those linking to or importing material which harasses other users. | |||
== File:Pin-45rightWC.gif listed for deletion == | |||
For the Arbitration Committee. Arbitration Committee Clerk, ] 02:42, 20 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:Idw --> ] (]) 05:05, 1 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
==AfD nomination of Troyster87== | |||
== A humble request for your opinion == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been listed for ]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at ]. Thank you.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.<!-- Template:Adw --> ] (]) 08:58, 10 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
==AfD nomination of Troyster87== | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been listed for ]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at ]. Thank you.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.<!-- Template:Adw --> ] (]) 09:05, 10 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Featured Picture delist nom == | |||
Hello! I hope you are feeling fine. Recently, you expressed an ''oppose'' opinion with regards to my ]. I would like to thank your feedback on this but I need another critical feedback from you. If you could spare a few minutes to voice any concerns you may be having with regards to my contributions to this project since my last RfA on this ], I would be most grateful. Once again, thank you for your time! --<font style="background:gold">]]</font><sup><font style="background:yellow">]</font></sup> 05:56, 20 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Just to let you know, a ] you nominated for Featured Picture status has been nominated for delist from Featured Pictures. Please see the ] for more information. ~ '''<span style="font-size:small;">]'''</span><sub>]</sub><sup>]</sup> 17:06, 10 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
==Cademuir== | |||
Thanks a lot for weighing in. I don't want to ] the well-intentioned young wikipedian who has made great efforts to improve the article, but I feel this could be a tricky article unless we keep a close eye on it, for all sorts of reasons. Thanks again. --] 22:34, 20 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Introgression == | |||
== Molecular and Cellular Biology Wikiproject Newsletter == | |||
Hi, | |||
first of all nice work to all of you doing the genetics section for wikipedia - it's been extremely valuable for me in my revision. | |||
I'm all new to this Misplaced Pages editing stuff. I don't want to edit an article myself because i'm no expert on the subject and I get the impression that you're associated with the article on introgression so I thought I'd write to you about it. | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology/Newsletter/October 2006}} | |||
It seems to be incorrect regarding what introgression is according to what I have read. I was under the impression that introgression is simply the movement of alleles between species or sub species, and that this was usually as a result of hybridisation and subsequent backcrossing (although I think the mechanism by which it occurs is not relevant to what it actually is) - NOT necessarily backcrossing between an individual and its parent i.e. it could occur by a hybrid breeding with individuals from either of the parent species rather than the parents themselves. | |||
== Jeff Galloway == | |||
As I say i'm no expert on the subject, but this is what I have been led to believe and a few minutes of research seem to confirm this (except if you look in the free online dictionary which seems to think that it is specifically related to backcrossing between offspring and parents). | |||
David, You left a message on my talk page. I am on a Wikibreak, as I noted on my talk page, so I haven't been my checking messages. Thanks for correcting Jeff Galloway's birthdate. Sorry for the late reply, but I am on a break. Thank you for helping on Wiki. I don't have time to help right now, so I appreciate folks who keep the ball rolling. Take care, KarateLady] 13:56, 22 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Anyway I thought that you might be interested. If you know otherwise then please let me know, because it would be useful for my exams! | |||
== What do you mean by "personal agenda" ? == | |||
Cheers | |||
Dear David D, What do you mean by "personal agenda" ? I do not see that consulting the results of the NORVIT trial consist of "original research". And what is wrong with including the results of "original research" in my edits on Misplaced Pages? Do you contend that this runs counter to the Misplaced Pages policy ? The edit concerning the ''Journal of Naturopathic Medicine'' was made after I receieved an email from Dr. Barrett confirming what I say. Does writing to Dr. Barrett to confirm a point constitute an unacceptable type of "original research" which cannot be used on the Misplaced Pages website ? May I respectfully ask you not to interfere with my edits unless you can show then to invalid ? I strongly feel that my edits should be included on the Misplaced Pages site until Dr. Barrett appropriately edits his website. He has not so far replied to an email I sent him about folic acid. I must ask you once again not to interfere with any edits I make unless you can fault them on a factual basis. Yours sincerly, ]. | |||
] (]) 14:54, 28 March 2009 (UTC)jugglia11 | |||
:Robert, look at the article critical of quackwatch and Barrett by Kauffman. He makes many specific criticisms of Barrett's articles, and others, but they are not discussed in detail. That is the level of critque that is expected for these articles. | |||
:With respect to your persoanl agenda, you seem agrieved by the fact you were misled by Barrett's web site and now you wish to bring this example to light. Misplaced Pages is not the forum for such criticism. It would be much better if you started a blog or a myspace type web page. ] ] 18:54, 23 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
== |
== Thanks == | ||
Thank you.. for all of your help. Talk to you soon--<span style="font-family:papyrus;">]''' ]'''</span> 07:14, 29 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
I have a riddle for you. Is the joke up? | |||
==Problem== | |||
Do you think 6317 and Yankees76 is the same person who is just faving fun? | |||
This might need just a touch of simplification. ] (]) 22:51, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Definitely. But there were so many edits flying around I didn't want to get caught in edit clashes. Also it took me a while to figure out the references, I didn't have time to double check them either. Some seemed out of place so i might have got them wrong. ] ] 01:09, 5 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Yeah, I'm still a bit overwhelmed with various forms of 'flu! ] (]) 01:31, 5 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::I'm not convinced this article is improving, in fact, quite the reverse - but I'm not sure what to do about it. ] (]) 02:32, 6 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
== 100/200 == | |||
It is very easy to log in and out of an account. You are good. Thanks for your contributions. | |||
Does look like the work of a masters student to you? I think it's fair to say he has cast doubt on the veracity of his claims. I really would like to see a citation on this maximum speed info. See ] for more... ]<small> (]) (])</small>'']'' 19:59, 19 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
:I was judging the quality of his contribution to the 100m and 200 m pages alone. I did not check the rest. I agree the rest are not great, but his edits on the 100 and 200 agree with everything I have ever read on the sprints. ] ] 21:09, 19 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Giano == | |||
I made it exceedingly clear that was not to be done without either my agreement (and then of course anyone else would be free to reblock), or with consensus on ANI. Neither of those things exists. Please restore the block and continue discussion on ANI. ] ] 05:24, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
I also ask you to revert your unblock. You admittedly didn't read the full discussion and even worse didn't talk to the blocking admin about it. ] (]) 05:29, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
I did read the full discussion. This war on productive editors is not helping the encyclopedia quality improve. Endless, very long discussions are wasting huge numbers of hours. This all started due to flagrant plagiarism, something that most RfA contributors either didn't take time to see or chose not to see. That scenario was an exceptional circumstance, and it is understandable why tensions were already high. But instead we want to go the route of many more lost writers hours? I don't want to play that game and I don't think the admins should be playing that game. Talk people of the ledge and persuade people to move to different corners. That is always preferable to using blocks. It should be a last resort. Many will say I ignored consensus but I did read the opinions and I weighed the arguments. I have no horse in this race but it is clear that many others do. Personally, I think that history causes many to wish for punitive admin decisions when that is not always the best for the encyclopedia. If this was really the last straw for many with regard to giano then it might be everyone is too close to the back story. ] ] 05:50, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
:For the record, I have never before been involved with Giano, and am just as uninvolved as you, if not more. Again I am asking you to reverse your out of process and out of consensus unblock and continue discussion. ] ] 06:01, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Your reversal of the block was seriously beyond the realm of policy or good judgment. I strongly advise you to reconsider. We simply don't unblock without talking to the blocking admin or serious consensus that the block was inappropriate, which does not exist here. - ] 06:45, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Arbitration == | |||
Hello. I'd like to inform you that I have filed a request for arbitration at ] in which you are referred to by name, though not as an involved party. Best regards, <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 14:08, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Request for arbitration == | |||
I've added your name to a ]. ] <sup>]</sup> 14:27, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
:I want to draw your attention to my comment ]. ] ] 06:40, 22 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Just noticed your edit. As I said, what i have started is half finished. ] ] 06:43, 22 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::Excellent, I am looking forward to reading it. ] ] 06:45, 22 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
==Mole (animal)== | |||
Thanks for your help separating the talk pages for the articles named Mole. It helps a lot. | |||
] (]) 21:22, 27 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Thanks also for your help on the talk page for Mole (Animal). I hope that my argument has been rhetorically successful enough for me to be able to continue work on the article only to have it undone. May I? ] (]) 02:56, 29 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
:If I were you I would wait for the two who originally undid the work to reply. Certainly I'd be interested to see their response. Meanwhile, you could always work on a copy in a sandbox. For example, ]. In general, I think you will find that wikipedia works best if you don't rush things. ] ] 03:09, 29 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Agreed. If you, at any point, feel it appropriate, I'd appreciate your giving me a nod, a go-ahead. ] (]) 03:28, 29 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
== This is the "right forum" == | |||
I have no other place to address Ed Poor, and an accusation of cowardice like that should be in public, where it belongs, so that the other side cannot ignore the accusation. Please leave any censorship of that accusation to Ed Poor and attend other matters of unencyclopedic content, of which there are regrettably many. ] (]) 22:17, 28 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
:He has already . ] ] 03:05, 29 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
::And that is done to enforce censorship. By protecting his page, you're only assisting in his irresponsible actions.] (]) 05:12, 30 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
==Flagwaving== | |||
See "Joseph Gold" in this review . ] (]) 17:20, 12 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
== You have been nominated for membership of the Established Editors Association == | |||
The Established editors association will be a kind of union of who have made substantial and enduring contributions to the encyclopedia for a period of time (say, two years or more). The proposed articles of association are - suggestions welcome. | |||
If you wish to be elected, please notify me . If you know of someone else who may be eligible, please nominate them | |||
Please put all discussion .] (]) 10:24, 13 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
I've suggested this be replaced with ] as the FP at ] ] (]) 16:50, 13 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
==File copyright problem with File:Itk_GNF1Hthumb.png== | |||
] | |||
Thank you for uploading ]. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Misplaced Pages takes ] very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the '''license''' and the '''source''' of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a ''']''' to the ]. | |||
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . | |||
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the ]. Thanks again for your cooperation.<!-- Template:Di-no license-notice --> ] (]) 00:23, 30 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
== ] nomination of ] == | |||
]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for ]. The nominated article is ]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also ] and "]"). | |||
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to ]. Please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). | |||
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the ] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. | |||
'''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a ]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --] (]) 01:05, 6 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
Hi David. I'm less than please with the replacement of the Introduction to evolution article with the current version. There are components that are excellent and could have been incorporated; however, I generated a list of concerns with my limited skill sets. I'm perplexed how an FA article could be completed replaced with a solo act with little or no citations. I feel it reads like an opinion paper and not a scientific article. I'm not prepared to be drug into the quagmire - been there - done that as Random Replicator; so I will precede with caution here. Nor am I suggesting we revisit the good old days of simultaneous FA and Deletion; however, your thoughts on the article talk page would be most appreciated. Cheers!--] (]) 19:42, 19 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
==GA reassessment of ]== | |||
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the ]. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found some concerns which you can see at ]. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. ] (]) 20:49, 28 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
==Request for help== | |||
I am will shortly be posting to ] with the request below. Any support would be appreciated. | |||
===Request to WP:AN=== | |||
"I would like to take the article ] to FA. I have already sought input from a number of contributors and have cleared up the issues raised (I am sure there are more). I wrote nearly all of the article using different accounts, as follows: | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
I would like to continue this work but I am frustrated by the zealous activity of ] who keeps making significant reverts, and blocking accounts wherever he suspects the work of a 'banned user'. (Fram claims s/he doesn't understand "the people who feel that content is more important than anything else"). | |||
Can I please be left in peace with the present account to complete this work. 'History of logic' is a flagship article for Misplaced Pages, and is an argument against those enemies who claim that nothing serious can ever be accomplished by the project". ] (]) 10:00, 6 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
==Orphaned non-free image File:Crick.jpg== | |||
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
'''PLEASE NOTE:''' | |||
* I am a ], and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. | |||
* I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again. | |||
* If you receive this notice ''after'' the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request. | |||
* To opt out of these bot messages, add <code><nowiki>{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}</nowiki></code> to your talk page. | |||
*If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off ] and leave a message on ]. | |||
Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 00:22, 19 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
== ] nomination of ] == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been listed for ]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at ]. Thank you.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.<!-- Template:Adw --> ] (]) 12:24, 31 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Your sandbox2 == | |||
I ran across ] in a Google search for . It appears to be a copy of http://www.uri.edu/cels/bio/plant_anatomy/glossary.html. Unless you are Alison Roberts, it would seem to be a copyright violation. Am I missing something?--] (]) 16:55, 21 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
:It's a sand box, a guide for future topics. It is a copyright even if not in the main namespace? ] ] 17:50, 25 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
== File:Fourpillars.jpg listed for deletion == | |||
A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ''']'''<sup>]</sup> 22:30, 11 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
== All files in category Unclassified Chemical Structures listed for deletion == | |||
One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you. | |||
<small>Delivered by ] on behalf of ] (]) at 17:47, 28 November 2011 (UTC).</small> | |||
<!-- Delivery approved by ]. --> | |||
== MSU Interview == | |||
Dear David D., | |||
My name is Jonathan Obar ], I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Misplaced Pages administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community], where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students. | |||
So a few things about the interviews: | |||
* Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes. | |||
* Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.) | |||
* All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so. | |||
* All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time. | |||
* The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly. | |||
Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name] instead. | |||
If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you. | |||
Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
Jonathan Obar --] (]) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 14:07, 14 February 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
==Science lovers wanted!== | |||
{|style="background:#ccc; border:1px solid #6881b9; margin:0.5em; padding:0.5em;border-radius: 8px;" | |||
|- | |||
!colspan=2 style="font-size:150%;"|Science lovers wanted! | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the ] until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Misplaced Pages about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in the sciences! Sign up to participate ] and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our ]. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the ], and of course, if you share your successes at the ] page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! ] (]) 01:10, 18 April 2012 (UTC)|} | |||
==Orphaned non-free image File:Crick.jpg== | |||
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 03:33, 1 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
==Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== | |||
] | |||
Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin --><small>(] · ]) · ] · </small> 03:07, 2 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
==Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== | |||
] | |||
Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin --> ] (]) 20:54, 26 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
==Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== | |||
] | |||
Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->Regards, — ] ] 08:15, 3 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692013717 --> | |||
== WikiProject Athletics Happy New Year == | |||
Wishing you a Happy New Year on behalf of ]! You can read of some of the ] at the project talk page (please feel free to add your own thoughts and achievements!). ] 18:33, 31 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The file ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> | |||
<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:00, 3 February 2020 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 05:40, 5 March 2023
| ||
You may here |
Atulsnishchal
I noticed that you had unblocked Atul on a "trial basis". Please look into his recent canvassing in 7 unrelated talk pages about certain wikipedia articles, and his call-to-action directed towards certain religious adherents. Not to mention his message was extremely POV in religious lines.
Thanks. --Ragib (talk) 06:53, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- I would also like to add that, this user admitted to using an anon IP to continue his disruptive edits while his account was banned, (that IP itself was blocked due to disruptive edits). The IP in question is 99.235.98.169, and the user admits to using this IP here. --Ragib (talk) 07:58, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Well I cant help it Ragib if you continually think I have bad faith, In my unblock request i mentioned I used this IP. , this is if you genuinely think i have bad faith etc. Atulsnischal (talk) 08:14, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- I knew about the IP. I unblocked you anyway thinking you might turn over a new leaf. Collaborate, wikipedia is not a war and its not about who can recruit the largest army. David D. (Talk) 16:03, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
File:Pin-45rightWC.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pin-45rightWC.gif, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:05, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Troyster87
An article that you have been involved in editing, Troyster87, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/J Stalin (3rd nomination). Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Troyster87 (talk) 08:58, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Troyster87
An article that you have been involved in editing, Troyster87, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/J Stalin (3rd nomination). Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Troyster87 (talk) 09:05, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Featured Picture delist nom
Just to let you know, a photo you nominated for Featured Picture status has been nominated for delist from Featured Pictures. Please see the delist nom for more information. ~ ωαdεstεr16♣T 17:06, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Introgression
Hi, first of all nice work to all of you doing the genetics section for wikipedia - it's been extremely valuable for me in my revision.
I'm all new to this Misplaced Pages editing stuff. I don't want to edit an article myself because i'm no expert on the subject and I get the impression that you're associated with the article on introgression so I thought I'd write to you about it.
It seems to be incorrect regarding what introgression is according to what I have read. I was under the impression that introgression is simply the movement of alleles between species or sub species, and that this was usually as a result of hybridisation and subsequent backcrossing (although I think the mechanism by which it occurs is not relevant to what it actually is) - NOT necessarily backcrossing between an individual and its parent i.e. it could occur by a hybrid breeding with individuals from either of the parent species rather than the parents themselves.
As I say i'm no expert on the subject, but this is what I have been led to believe and a few minutes of research seem to confirm this (except if you look in the free online dictionary which seems to think that it is specifically related to backcrossing between offspring and parents).
Anyway I thought that you might be interested. If you know otherwise then please let me know, because it would be useful for my exams!
Cheers
Jugglia11 (talk) 14:54, 28 March 2009 (UTC)jugglia11
Thanks
Thank you.. for all of your help. Talk to you soon--Michael (Talk) 07:14, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Problem
This might need just a touch of simplification. Tim Vickers (talk) 22:51, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Definitely. But there were so many edits flying around I didn't want to get caught in edit clashes. Also it took me a while to figure out the references, I didn't have time to double check them either. Some seemed out of place so i might have got them wrong. David D. (Talk) 01:09, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm still a bit overwhelmed with various forms of 'flu! Tim Vickers (talk) 01:31, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not convinced this article is improving, in fact, quite the reverse - but I'm not sure what to do about it. Tim Vickers (talk) 02:32, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm still a bit overwhelmed with various forms of 'flu! Tim Vickers (talk) 01:31, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
100/200
Does this look like the work of a masters student to you? I think it's fair to say he has cast doubt on the veracity of his claims. I really would like to see a citation on this maximum speed info. See talk:200 metres for more... Sillyfolkboy (talk) (edits) 19:59, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- I was judging the quality of his contribution to the 100m and 200 m pages alone. I did not check the rest. I agree the rest are not great, but his edits on the 100 and 200 agree with everything I have ever read on the sprints. David D. (Talk) 21:09, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Giano
I made it exceedingly clear that was not to be done without either my agreement (and then of course anyone else would be free to reblock), or with consensus on ANI. Neither of those things exists. Please restore the block and continue discussion on ANI. Prodego 05:24, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
I also ask you to revert your unblock. You admittedly didn't read the full discussion and even worse didn't talk to the blocking admin about it. RxS (talk) 05:29, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
I did read the full discussion. This war on productive editors is not helping the encyclopedia quality improve. Endless, very long discussions are wasting huge numbers of hours. This all started due to flagrant plagiarism, something that most RfA contributors either didn't take time to see or chose not to see. That scenario was an exceptional circumstance, and it is understandable why tensions were already high. But instead we want to go the route of many more lost writers hours? I don't want to play that game and I don't think the admins should be playing that game. Talk people of the ledge and persuade people to move to different corners. That is always preferable to using blocks. It should be a last resort. Many will say I ignored consensus but I did read the opinions and I weighed the arguments. I have no horse in this race but it is clear that many others do. Personally, I think that history causes many to wish for punitive admin decisions when that is not always the best for the encyclopedia. If this was really the last straw for many with regard to giano then it might be everyone is too close to the back story. David D. (Talk) 05:50, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- For the record, I have never before been involved with Giano, and am just as uninvolved as you, if not more. Again I am asking you to reverse your out of process and out of consensus unblock and continue discussion. Prodego 06:01, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Your reversal of the block was seriously beyond the realm of policy or good judgment. I strongly advise you to reconsider. We simply don't unblock without talking to the blocking admin or serious consensus that the block was inappropriate, which does not exist here. - Philippe 06:45, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Arbitration
Hello. I'd like to inform you that I have filed a request for arbitration at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Moni3 in which you are referred to by name, though not as an involved party. Best regards, Sandstein 14:08, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Request for arbitration
I've added your name to a request for arbitration. Jehochman 14:27, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- I want to draw your attention to my comment Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration/Requests#Block review/unblocking procedures and protocol. Prodego 06:40, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Just noticed your edit. As I said, what i have started is half finished. David D. (Talk) 06:43, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Excellent, I am looking forward to reading it. Prodego 06:45, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Just noticed your edit. As I said, what i have started is half finished. David D. (Talk) 06:43, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Mole (animal)
Thanks for your help separating the talk pages for the articles named Mole. It helps a lot. Chrisrus (talk) 21:22, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks also for your help on the talk page for Mole (Animal). I hope that my argument has been rhetorically successful enough for me to be able to continue work on the article only to have it undone. May I? Chrisrus (talk) 02:56, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- If I were you I would wait for the two who originally undid the work to reply. Certainly I'd be interested to see their response. Meanwhile, you could always work on a copy in a sandbox. For example, User:Chrisrus/Mole. In general, I think you will find that wikipedia works best if you don't rush things. David D. (Talk) 03:09, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed. If you, at any point, feel it appropriate, I'd appreciate your giving me a nod, a go-ahead. Chrisrus (talk) 03:28, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
This is the "right forum"
I have no other place to address Ed Poor, and an accusation of cowardice like that should be in public, where it belongs, so that the other side cannot ignore the accusation. Please leave any censorship of that accusation to Ed Poor and attend other matters of unencyclopedic content, of which there are regrettably many. 71.193.206.116 (talk) 22:17, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- He has already set the precedent. David D. (Talk) 03:05, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- And that is done to enforce censorship. By protecting his page, you're only assisting in his irresponsible actions.71.193.206.116 (talk) 05:12, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Flagwaving
See "Joseph Gold" in this review link. Tim Vickers (talk) 17:20, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
You have been nominated for membership of the Established Editors Association
The Established editors association will be a kind of union of who have made substantial and enduring contributions to the encyclopedia for a period of time (say, two years or more). The proposed articles of association are here - suggestions welcome.
If you wish to be elected, please notify me here. If you know of someone else who may be eligible, please nominate them here
Please put all discussion here.Peter Damian (talk) 10:24, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
File:Romanian_hay.jpg
I've suggested this be replaced with File:Romania_Hay_better_version.jpg as the FP at Misplaced Pages:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image:Romanian hay.jpg Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 16:50, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Itk_GNF1Hthumb.png
Thank you for uploading File:Itk_GNF1Hthumb.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Misplaced Pages takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:23, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Introduction to evolution
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Introduction to evolution. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Misplaced Pages:Notability and "What Misplaced Pages is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Introduction to evolution (3rd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Introduction to Evolution
Hi David. I'm less than please with the replacement of the Introduction to evolution article with the current version. There are components that are excellent and could have been incorporated; however, I generated a list of concerns with my limited skill sets. I'm perplexed how an FA article could be completed replaced with a solo act with little or no citations. I feel it reads like an opinion paper and not a scientific article. I'm not prepared to be drug into the quagmire - been there - done that as Random Replicator; so I will precede with caution here. Nor am I suggesting we revisit the good old days of simultaneous FA and Deletion; however, your thoughts on the article talk page would be most appreciated. Cheers!--JimmyButler (talk) 19:42, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
GA reassessment of Photosynthetic reaction centre
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Photosynthetic reaction centre/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:49, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
Request for help
I am will shortly be posting to WP:AN with the request below. Any support would be appreciated.
Request to WP:AN
"I would like to take the article History of logic to FA. I have already sought input from a number of contributors and have cleared up the issues raised (I am sure there are more). I wrote nearly all of the article using different accounts, as follows:
- User:Peter Damian (old)
- User:HistorianofLogic
- User:Logicist
- User:Here today, gone tomorrow
- User:Renamed user 4
I would like to continue this work but I am frustrated by the zealous activity of User:Fram who keeps making significant reverts, and blocking accounts wherever he suspects the work of a 'banned user'. (Fram claims s/he doesn't understand "the people who feel that content is more important than anything else").
Can I please be left in peace with the present account to complete this work. 'History of logic' is a flagship article for Misplaced Pages, and is an argument against those enemies who claim that nothing serious can ever be accomplished by the project". Logic Historian (talk) 10:00, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Crick.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Crick.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:22, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Jonathan Wells (intelligent design advocate)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Jonathan Wells (intelligent design advocate), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Wells (intelligent design advocate). Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Wolfview (talk) 12:24, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Your sandbox2
I ran across User:David D./sandbox2 in a Google search for text added to Plant Cell. It appears to be a copy of http://www.uri.edu/cels/bio/plant_anatomy/glossary.html. Unless you are Alison Roberts, it would seem to be a copyright violation. Am I missing something?--Curtis Clark (talk) 16:55, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
- It's a sand box, a guide for future topics. It is a copyright even if not in the main namespace? David D. (Talk) 17:50, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
File:Fourpillars.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fourpillars.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones 22:30, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
All files in category Unclassified Chemical Structures listed for deletion
One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 17:47, 28 November 2011 (UTC).
MSU Interview
Dear David D.,
My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Misplaced Pages administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.
So a few things about the interviews:
- Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
- Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
- All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
- All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
- The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.
Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.
If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.
Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chlopeck (talk • contribs) 14:07, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Science lovers wanted!
Science lovers wanted! | |
---|---|
Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian Institution Archives until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Misplaced Pages about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in the sciences! Sign up to participate here and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our to-do list. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the request page, and of course, if you share your successes at the outcomes page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! Sarah (talk) 01:10, 18 April 2012 (UTC)|}
Orphaned non-free image File:Crick.jpgThanks for uploading File:Crick.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:33, 1 June 2012 (UTC) Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivityFollowing a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. (X! · talk) · @172 · 03:07, 2 January 2013 (UTC) Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivityFollowing a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 20:54, 26 January 2013 (UTC) Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivityFollowing a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 08:15, 3 February 2013 (UTC) ArbCom elections are now open!Hi, WikiProject Athletics Happy New YearWishing you a Happy New Year on behalf of WikiProject Athletics! You can read of some of the project's achievements this year at the project talk page (please feel free to add your own thoughts and achievements!). SFB 18:33, 31 December 2015 (UTC) Proposed deletion of File:FlyFlower.jpgThe file File:FlyFlower.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 3 February 2020 (UTC) |