Misplaced Pages

Talk:1947 Jammu massacres: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:33, 8 April 2018 editKautilya3 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers86,407 editsm Poor quality edits: Fixing style/layout errors← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:33, 22 December 2024 edit undoAliyiya5903 (talk | contribs)490 edits Undid revision 1264642139 by Aliyiya5903 (talk)Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit 
(201 intermediate revisions by 56 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talk header}}
{{WikiProject India|class=B|b1=y|b2=y|b3=y|b4=y|b5=y|importance=mid|jandk=yes|jandk-importance=high|assessdate=September 2016}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|
{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Death|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Disaster management|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject India|importance=mid|jandk=yes|jandk-importance=high|assessdate=September 2016}}
{{WikiProject Law|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Law Enforcement|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Military history|Indian-task-force=yes|South-Asian-task-force=Y|Cold-War=yes|b1=no|b2=yes|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=yes}}
{{WikiProject Sociology|importance=Low}}
}}
{{Merged-from|1947 Mirpur massacre|20 August 2022}}
{{Annual readership}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config | algo = old(365d) | archive = Talk:1947 Jammu massacres/Archive %(counter)d | counter = 1 | maxarchivesize = 150K | archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} | minthreadstoarchive = 1 | minthreadsleft = 8 }}


== Bibliography ==
<!-- START PIN -->{{Pin message|}}<!-- ] 11:41, 27 March 2032 (UTC) -->{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|1964000482}}<!-- END PIN -->
* {{cite journal |last=Ankit |first=Rakesh |title=Henry Scott: The forgotten soldier of Kashmir |journal=Epilogue |volume=4 |number=5 |url=http://documents.mx/documents/epilogue-magazine-may-2010.html |date=May 2010 |pages=44–49 |ref={{sfnref|Ankit, Henry Scott|2010}} |access-date=27 February 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170510084911/http://documents.mx/documents/epilogue-magazine-may-2010.html |archive-date=10 May 2017 |url-status=dead }}
*{{cite book |last=Bhagotra |first=R. K. |chapter=Escape from Death Seven Times |editor-last=Gupta |editor-first=Bal K. |title=Forgotten Atrocities: Memoirs of a Survivor of the 1947 Partition of India |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=N2BIAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA123 |publisher=Lulu.com |isbn=978-1-257-91419-7 |year=2013 |orig-year=1987 |pages=123–125 }}
* {{citation |last=Bhattacharya |first=Brigadier Samir |title=NOTHING BUT!: Book Three: What Price Freedom |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HESVAgAAQBAJ |date=2013 |publisher=Partridge Publishing |isbn=978-1-4828-1625-9 |ref={{sfnref|Bhattacharya, What Price Freedom|2013}}}}
*{{cite thesis |type=PhD |last=Chattha |first=Ilyas Ahmad |title=Partition and Its Aftermath: Violence, Migration and the Role of Refugees in the Socio-Economic Development of Gujranwala and Sialkot Cities, 1947-1961 |date=September 2009 |url=https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/366712/ |ref={{sfnref|Chattha, Partition and its Aftermath|2009}} |publisher=Centre for Imperial and Post-Colonial Studies, School of Humanities, University of Southampton |access-date=16 February 2016 }}
:*Since republished as {{cite book |last=Chattha |first=Ilyas |title=Partition and Locality: Violence, Migration and Development in Gujranwala and Sialkot 1947–1961 |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2011 |isbn=9780199061723}}
* {{citation |last=Chattha |first=Ilyas |chapter=Escape from Violence: The 1947 Partition of India and the Migration of Kashmiri Muslim Refugees |editor1=P. Panayi |editor2=P. Virdee |title=Refugees and the End of Empire: Imperial Collapse and Forced Migration in the Twentieth Century |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8cCHDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA214 |year=2011 |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan UK |isbn=978-0-230-30570-0 |pages=196–218 |ref={{sfnref|Chattha, Escape from Violence|2011}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Chattha |first=Ilyas |chapter=The Long Shadow of 1947: Partition, Violence and Displacement in Jammu & Kashmir |editor1=Amritjit Singh |editor2=Nalini Iyer |editor3=Rahul K. Gairola |title=Revisiting India's Partition: New Essays on Memory, Culture, and Politics |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tmA0DAAAQBAJ&pg=PA145 |year=2016 |publisher=Lexington Books |isbn=978-1-4985-3105-4 |pages=143–156|ref={{sfnref|Chattha, The Long Shadow of 1947|2016}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Copland |first=Ian |chapter=The Abdullah Factor: Kashmiri Muslims and the Crisis of 1947 |editor=D. A. Low |title=Political Inheritance of Pakistan |year=1991 |publisher=Springer |isbn=9781349115563 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VaeuCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA254 |ref={{sfnref|Copland, The Abdullah Factor}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Copland |first=Ian |title=State, Community and Neighbourhood in Princely North India, c. 1900-1950 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=squHDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA153 |year=2005 |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan UK |isbn=978-0-230-00598-3 |pages=153– |ref={{sfnref|Copland, State, Community and Neighbourhood|2005}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Das Gupta |first=Jyoti Bhusan |title=Jammu and Kashmir |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dpTpCAAAQBAJ |date=2012 |orig-year=first published 1968 |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-94-011-9231-6 |ref={{sfnref|Das Gupta, Jammu and Kashmir|2012}}}}
*{{cite book |last=Hasan |first=Khalid |chapter=Mirpur 1947 |editor-last=Gupta |editor-first=Bal K. |title=Forgotten Atrocities: Memoirs of a Survivor of the 1947 Partition of India |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=N2BIAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA141 |year=2013 |url=https://archive.today/20131102010704/http://www.khalidhasan.net/2007/03/16/mirpur-1947-%E2%80%93-the-untold-story |orig-year=2007 |publisher=Lulu.com |isbn=978-1-257-91419-7 |pages=141–144 |ref={{sfnref|Hasan, Mirpur 1947|2013}}}}
* {{citation |last=Nawaz |first=Shuja |title=The First Kashmir War Revisited |journal=India Review |volume=7 |number=2 |pages=115–154 |doi=10.1080/14736480802055455 |date=May 2008 |s2cid=155030407 }}
* {{cite book |last=Sharma |first=Ram Chander |chapter=Mirpur – Forgotten City |editor-last=Gupta |editor-first=Bal K. |title=Forgotten Atrocities: Memoirs of a Survivor of the 1947 Partition of India |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=N2BIAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA141 |year=2013 |orig-year=first published in ''Daily Excelsior'', date unknown |pages=138–140 |publisher=Lulu.com |isbn=978-1-257-91419-7|ref=none }}
* {{Cite book |last=Puri |first=Luv |title=Across the Line of Control: Inside Pakistan-administered Jammu and Kashmir |publisher=Hurst |year=2012 |isbn=9781849041737 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kYVcuqYr5FIC&pg=PA25 |ref={{sfnref|Puri, Across the Line of Control|2012}}}}
* {{citation |last=Raghavan |first=Srinath |title=War and Peace in Modern India: A Strategic History of the Nehru Years |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EbtBJb1bsHUC |date=2010 |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |isbn=978-1-137-00737-7 |ref={{sfnref|Raghavan, War and Peace in Modern India|2010}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Saraf |first=Muhammad Yusuf |author-link=Muhammad Yusuf Saraf |title=Kashmiris Fight for Freedom, Volume 2 |year=2015 |orig-year=first published 1979 by Ferozsons |publisher=National Institute Kashmir Studies |location=Mirpur |ref={{sfnref|Saraf, Kashmiris Fight for Freedom, Volume 2|2015}}}}
* {{cite journal |last=Snedden |first=Christopher |author-link=Christopher Snedden |title=What happened to Muslims in Jammu? Local identity, '"the massacre" of 1947' and the roots of the 'Kashmir problem' |journal=South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies |volume=24 |number=2 |year=2001 |pages=111–134 |doi=10.1080/00856400108723454 |s2cid=143991832 |ref={{sfnref|Snedden, What happened to Muslims in Jammu?|2001}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Snedden |first=Christopher |year=2013 |author-link=Christopher Snedden |title=Kashmir: The Unwritten History |publisher=HarperCollins India |isbn=978-9350298985 |orig-year=first published as ''The Untold Story of the People of Azad Kashmir'', 2012 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0cPjAAAAQBAJ |ref={{sfnref|Snedden, Kashmir: The Unwritten History|2013}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Snedden |first=Christopher |title=Understanding Kashmir and Kashmiris |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=s5KMCwAAQBAJ |year=2015 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-1-84904-342-7 |ref={{sfnref|Snedden, Understanding Kashmir and Kashmiris|2015}}}}


== Sources == == March 2023 ==


Regarding , I fail to understand what part was “far too liberal” paraphrasing. In fact, quite the contrary, the current wording seems to be a misrepresentation of the source. ] (]) 12:12, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Comments on the .


== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 17 March 2023 ==
For events that happened in 1947, we need to use ]. At a minimum, they must be scholarly sources. Other sources, if they are valuable and appear reliable, can be described with ].
* Saeed Naqvi's book is copy-righted by author and the publisher disclaimed responsibility for accuracy. So it must be used with extreme caution.
* The passage quotes Horace Alexander's news report from 1947 with ''in-text attribution''. It is not proper to state it as fact. Moreover, the report says {{tq|2,37,000 Muslims were systematically exterminated – ''unless they escaped to Pakistan along the border''}}. So this figure includes both the Muslims that got killed as well as those that migrated.
As I have remarked , there were 700,000 Muslims in the Indian-administered portion of the Jammu province. So it is theoretically impossible for 237,000 Muslims to have died and another 300,000 to havae migrated, and still retain 33.5% of the population in India.


{{Edit extended-protected|1947 Jammu massacres|answered=yes}}
I am going to replace all this folklore content by reliably sourced figures. -- ] (]) 14:53, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
I would like to add the following text to the "Violence against Jammu Muslims" section based on the book ''Kashmir, 1947: Rival Versions of History'' by Prem Shankar Jha. (ISBN: 9780195648584, Publisher: Oxford University Press, Pages cited: 11-12). Please add the following to the third paragraph in the section "Violence against Jammu Muslims". Text to be added as follows:


However, alternately, Prem Shankar Jha states in his book ''Kashmir, 1947: Rival Versions of History'', "That while there were undoubtedly atrocities committed by bands of Sikhs and by some of the state troops against Muslims in the border belt of Jammu province in the first weeks of October, these were caused by an overspill into the state of the communal carnage occurring all along its borders in East and West Punjab, and overreaction and loss of control by the state forces in the face of atrocities committed by Muslims on Hindus both within Jammu & Kashmir state and in the adjoining areas of west Punjab, where only slightly less than half the population was Hindu and Sikh. While this was certainly no justification, Pakistan's charge that state troops were 'cleansing' the state of its 77 percent Muslim population in order to enable the Maharaja to accede to India is wholly unsustainable. Had this been his intention, he would have first 'cleansed' his 8,000-strong state force of its almost 3,000 Muslims and not waited for them to kill their officers before deserting to the enemy on 23-5 October. That the raids into Kashmir by the Pathan tribesmen were not spontaneous retaliation aimed at saving their Muslim brethren from the Dogra genocide but were carefully planned and instigated at least from the end of August or early September, i.e., a whole month before any of the alleged atrocities by the Kashmir state troops against Muslims in the border region took place, at a time when Kashmir was completely peaceful."<ref>{{cite book |last1=Jha |first1=Prem Shankar |title=Kashmir, 1947: Rival Versions of History |date=1998 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=9780195648584 |pages=11-12}}</ref> ] (]) 14:52, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
== Census analysis ==
:] '''Not done for now:'''<!-- Template:EEp --> Quoting such a large section directly is discouraged, especially when it is not essential to the article. Please rewrite to meet the relevant ] guidelines. Remember to avoid direct paraphrasing and instead write your own summary. Feel free to re-open this request when appropriate. ] (]) 15:13, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
::Thank you @] I've re-written the following text to the "Violence against Jammu Muslims" section based on the book ''Kashmir, 1947: Rival Versions of History'' by Prem Shankar Jha. (ISBN: 9780195648584, Publisher: Oxford University Press, Pages cited: 11-12). Please add the following to the third paragraph in the section "Violence against Jammu Muslims". Text to be added as follows:
::Journalist Prem Shankar Jha states in his book ''Kashmir, 1947: Rival Versions of History'', "That while there were undoubtedly atrocities committed by bands of Sikhs and by some of the state troops against Muslims in the border belt of Jammu province in the first weeks of October, these were caused by an overspill into the state of the communal carnage occurring all along its borders in East and West Punjab."
::W. F. Webb was the British political agent in Kashmir during the 1947 and reported fortnightly to Crown representative of the state i.e. Viceroy. He reported in his September 1946 that Kashmir as a whole remained virtually untouched by the 'Direct Action' program launched by Jinnah in British India. His report for December 1946 reported that even the arrival of 2,500 Hindu and Sikh refugees from the tribal agency of Hazara did not cause any communal tension in Kashmir. When the communal violence started in Punjab in 1947, Maharaja Hari Singh sent more troops to Kashmir-Punjab border to ensure no trouble makers enter the territory from Punjab. This was reported by Reuters from Srinagar.
::Maharaja Hari Singh has been wrongly accused of ethnic cleansing of Muslim population, as his 8,000-strong state force had almost 3,000 Muslims so how can such ethnic cleansing be carried out without cleansing the state force first. Also the raids into Kashmir by the Pathan tribesmen were not spontaneous retaliation aimed at saving their Muslim from the Dogra genocide but were carefully planned and instigated at least from the end of August or early September, i.e., a whole month before any of the alleged atrocities by the Kashmir state troops against Muslims in the border region took place, at a time when Kashmir was completely peaceful." ] (]) 16:28, 20 March 2023 (UTC)


{{ping|Vamsee614}} I have removed your personal analysis of the census data. In the first place, you are not allowed to present your own interpretation of the ] source data. Secondly, your analysis is faulty. The 1941 census and the 1961 census measure different geographical areas, the entire Jammu province in case of 1941 and the Indian-controlled region in case of 1961. You can't compare them.

On another note, ] states (the cited book, p. 50), that the total number of Muslims in the Hindu-majority districts of the Jammu province (Jammu, Kathua, Udhampur and Chenani) was 346,000. It is theoretically impossible for 200,000 Muslims to have been 'massacred' and another 300,000 to have migrated. There are wild exaggerations all over the place. Please use reliable sources, and avoid propaganda and half-baked reports. -- ] (]) 21:44, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

'']]''

Thanks a lot Kautilya for your appreciation and guidance. I think majority of the citations listed out in the references section of the article https://en.wikipedia.org/1947_Jammu_massacres particularly qualify as reliable and neutral sources and I have studied them thoroughly. However I will surely further research on the content and try to develop it. I would like you to kindly elaborate what you meant by historically reliable sources, which as you mean are lacking currently. And I'm sorry for spreading out any half-baked information to other pages. I sincerely apologize. I'm still new to editing in Misplaced Pages and will refrain from doing anything as such in the future. Anyhow I'm not trying to sensationalize the incident as you have opined, I'm fully aware of the sensitiveness involved in the content and so I'm being much careful and absolutely neutral. After all its a 60-year old event doesn't mean it can be conveniently ignored, its occurrence had deep impact in the origins of the Kashmir conflict. My only intent is to bring this historically significant and event to readers knowledge despite being covered up due to political censorship as I can see. Apparently there are very few reports in the media or the historical accounts in India regarding such a mass killing which has been highly consequential. Despite having so many repercussions, it is quite seldom mentioned in any of the discussions about the concerned phases in our history. Therefore I feel that it is to be elaborated and given its due importance in the history, at least by simply acknowledging and stating that it occurred so, and by making people just aware of its occurrence to enhance their knowledge. I believe it is one of the fundamental mottos of Misplaced Pages. Thank you once again for the help and please continue to provide support with your valuable suggestions, if you may. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 21:01, 25 November 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

: Hi Vamsee, yes it is an important event and it needs to be documented, but we don't do anybody any service by putting up random propaganda materials on Misplaced Pages. As I have pointed out on the article talk page, the numbers that are often thrown around are theoretically impossible. Chattha's thesis is a good source, and Christopher Snedden's book is an excellent source. You need to read them thoroughly, not just take little bits and pieces.
:* We also need to make it clear that the violence in Jammu was an extension of the partition violence in Punjab and NWFP. It didn't come out of the blue. All said and done, Jammu still has 33.5% population Muslim (and Poonch is still 90% Muslim), which is infinitely better than what the neighbouring Punjab has managed.
:* And, you can't take any British source as being neutral and third-party. The British were up to their necks in both India and Pakistan and various individuals bought into their stories. So, we can't just narrate what the sources say, but we also need to dig into what kind of a source it is, where the information is coming from (read the ''footnotes'').
:* We have reasonably good information that at least 70,000 were killed (Snedden's book, page 53, table 2.2). That is about the only thing I am certain of. The Pakistanis claim that another 200,000 migrated to West Punjab. But 270,000 is already too high a figure. There weren't enough Muslims in the Hindu-majority districts of Jammu to give such a high figure.
:* The timing also needs to be studied carefully. The earliest 'massacre' in Table 2.2 occurred on 20 October. In contrast, Liaquat Ali Khan ordered the invasion on 12 September, more than a month earlier. (See the ]). Any suggestion that the massacres were the reason for the invasion is plain false. It is propaganda.
:* It is also not clear that the Muslims started migrating because of the massacres. The first exodus of Muslims was reported on the 26 September. (Again, see the Timeline.) By then the Maharaja had appointed Mehr Chand Mahajan as the Prime Minister and he was telling New Delhi that he was willing to accede to India. That is reason enough for pro-Pakistan Muslims to migrate.
: You need to read the policy pages ] etc. to get an idea of how to approach a subject like this. Even though the topic needs to be documented, the at which you started pushing unreliable and half-baked information to tons of pages was a serious problem. For all historical content, you need to use ]. Saeed Naqvi, for example, does not qualify. Both Chattha and Snedden are fine. -- ] (]) 12:17, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

:: {{ping|Vamsee614}} After comparing the figures from the 1941 census and the 2011 census, I think the figure of 237,000 is believable, provided it is understood as the number killed plus the number migrated. The author of the ''The Times'' report is apparently a partisan, which explains the sensational wording. The number I get from the comparison is 192,000 which is likely to be an underestimate due to the variability in the population growth rates. However, there were no additional 200,000–300,000 that are supposed to have migrated. The 237,000 figure represents the total loss. -- ] (]) 12:57, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
{{od}}
"The removal of the Muslim population in Jammu region is evidenced clearly
in the 1961 Census of India. In Jammu province, about 123 villages were ‘completely
depopulated’, while the decrease in the number of Muslims in Jammu district alone
was over 100,000.(59) It is possible to point out that the inter-religious violence that
occurred in Jammu included a possible ‘genocide’ of Muslims in September-October
1947. The Maharaja of the Dogra Hindu state was complicit in the targeted violence
against Kashmiri Muslims. ''Out of a total of 800,000 who tried to migrate, more than 237,000 Muslims were systematically exterminated by all the forces of the Dogra State, headed by the Maharaja in person and aided by Hindus and Sikhs.''(60) There is
evidence of similar behaviour in other Princely States. A police report pointed out that
over 250,000 Muslims alone were missing in the Sikh state of Patiala.(61)
{{collapse top|references}}
54 The Journey to Pakistan: Documentation on Refugees of 1947, pp. 298-9.

55 Interview with Zafar Butt, Sialkot, 16 January 2007.

56 Interview with Khalid Ali Gujar, Sialkot, 16 January 2007.

57 Interview with Kawaja Tahir, Sialkot, 16 January 2007.

58 Interview with Zarar Hussian, Sialkot, 15 January 2007.

59 The Census of India, 1961, Vol. V1, cited in M. H. Kamili (ed.), Jammu and Kashmir: Census of
India (Delhi : Manager of Publications, 1967), p.42 and p. 157 and pp. 359-60.

60 ‘Elimination of Muslims from Jammu’, II, The Times (London) 10 August 1948, p. 5"
{{collapse bottom}}
--- Pg 184, Partition and Its Aftermath: Violence, Migration and the Role of Refugees in the Socio-Economic Development of Gujranwala and Sialkot Cities, 1947-1961 by Ilyas Ahmad Chattha.

''you don't find this reasonable?''

] (]) 19:35, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

: Sigh. I have seen this stuff on web sites. It didn't occur to me to go look for it in Chattha's thesis. I am surprised that he was allowed to put it in as it is. This is bad. But note that this is one source among many. ] tells you to study all the sources and include what represents the scholarly consensus. I am afraid Chattha is mixing fact with fiction.
:* Let us interrogate the key figure: the number of Muslims killed. He says 237,000 were killed, and ignores the escape clause that appeared in ''The Times'' article: {{tq|unless they escaped to Pakistan}}. Where is Chattha accounting for the people that escaped? We have a reliable analysis that appeared in ''Dawn'' in 1950 or so, that said that 200,000 refugees arrived from J&K in September-November. If so, that would leave only 37,000 unaccounted for. (I am not taking the ''Dawn'' figures at face value either, but that is the analysis and reconciliation that Chattha has failed to do. Snedden does it.)
:* Where did the figure of 800,000 come from? That appears to be the total number of Muslims in the Indian-controlled Jammu province, chopping off the Poonch district into half. But Poonch was under the control of rebels throughout 1947, except for a garrison stuck in the fortified Poonch town. Were Muslims trying to migrate from their own territory? What about Rajouri, where the Muslims made up 68% of the population (or higher)? Were they trying to migrate from there too? If so, why didn't they? Bhimber is only a short hop away.
:* He cites the ''The Times'' article for both the figures. But, Snedden, reading the same article says that 411,000 Muslims were vulnerable. No mention of whether they were trying to "migrate". Chattha mentions this figure at the bottom of page 180 (of the thesis), but ignores it. This is substandard.
:* Chattha tells us that over 100,000 Muslims decreased in the "Jammu district alone". He is correct there. My calculations indicate that about 140,000 Muslims disappeared from the Jammu district. But what about the other districts? He is citing the 1961 census. So he knows the picture for all the districts. Why not tell us? By saying "Jammu district alone", he is trying to imply that things were equally bad in all the other places. But they weren't.
:* Our sources also tell us stuff like this: {{tq|To a limited extent threatening statements against the Kashmir Government issued on Radio Pakistan by Musim leaders who had migrated to Pakistan also added fuel to the fire. “Every time one of these leaders issued a sharp statement from Pakistan radio, firing on Muslim neighbourhood intensified.”<ref>{{citation |last=Ahmad |first=Khalid Bashir |title=circa 1947: A Long Story |newspaper=Kashmir Life |date=5 November 2014 |url=http://www.kashmirlife.net/circa-1947-a-long-story-67652/ |accessdate=11 October 2016}}
</ref>}} The so-called "Muslim leaders" were the ] leaders, to whom the Jammu Muslims subscribed. The Muslim Conference leaders were waging a war on the State, ignoring the fact that they had "hostages" inside. The conflict was also ''political'', not purely communal.
: If you don't have access to the Snedden artices/books, I suggest that you read at least the ''Kashmir Life'' article. It is not ideal, but it will at least give you some breadth that you are currently lacking. -- ] (]) 22:04, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
: By the way, I also tried to find out if Chattha has anything to say about the fate of non-Muslims in Mirpur and Poonch, but I couldn't. Perhaps you can dig into that. 20% of the Mirpur population was non-Muslim and 10% of Poonch jagir was non-Muslim. There were massacres there too. -- ] (]) 22:20, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
{{reflist-talk}} {{reflist-talk}}


== INA ==
== Estimate of number of Jammu Muslims killed ==


We need better sources for involvement of INA, AD, etc. ] (]) 23:45, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
:{{ping|TrangaBellam}} It is already noted at ] with about 4 sources.
:It is easy to find more reliable sources such as, "there began a wholesale massacre of Muslims in Jammu masterminded by the elements in the State Forces, the RSS, and former members of the Indian National Army", or "Muslims were massacred in Poonch and Jammu by the soldiers of the princely kingdom along with RSS and Akali Dal cadres".
:This information is not new. This 1952 source writes: "It continued at Bagh in Poonch when on 26 August State troops set on Muslims who had disobeyed an order forbidding the observance of 'Pakistan Day' (15 August). It increased in tempo to spread to Jammu Province in September and October, with the infiltration of the RSS, Akali Sikhs, and members of the Indian National Army from India." ''']''' <sup>('']'')</sup> 05:09, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
:By the INA it doesn't mean the organization but ex soldiers or serviceman, INA Muslim servicemen and members fought for pakistan and kashmiris such as zaman kiani and many hindu aswell sikh serviceman of INA served with Sikh groups and RSS ] (]) 14:36, 30 January 2024 (UTC)


==Dating==
{{ping|Kautilya3}}
"If we presume that the first figure of 333,964 included the roughly 100,000 East Punjab refugees safely escorted by Jammu and Kashmir on their way to Pakistan in 1947, we can estimate the number of Jammu Muslims killed to be a few tens of thousands." - isn't this line ]? Also we are taking too many figures (our census estimate of 'lost Muslims', counted figure of refugees in Pakistan & the Scott's refugee figure of 'at least 100,000 Muslims from East Punjab') at face value in this. This is just a doubt. Thank you. — ] (]) 08:49, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
: That is an arguable point. If you are concerned about it, we will need to get wider opinion about it. See ], which explains what forms of synthesis are allowed and what are not. In my interpretation, drawing a conclusion ''implied'' by the sources is allowed. I think people will differ on whether it is implied or not.
: Logically, the if...then... statement, which premises a conclusion on assumptions, is a valid consequence from the sourced data. But I admit that not all readers of the English language understand the if...then... statement in such a precise way. I can try rewording it, with some amount of backup from Snedden, who makes similar arguments.
: Are we taking the figures at face value? I don't think so. My "few tons of thousands" is quite a vague estimate. Its purpose is to say "hundreds of thousands" is impossible (which is what most sources report, unfortunately).
: Note that 333,964 is the ''lowest'' figure reported for refugees in Pakistan. Others go up to a million. The 100,000 is evidently a rough estimate. -- ] (]) 12:03, 23 February 2017 (UTC)


{{ping|Kautilya3}} How are not a part of Jammu massacre? The source clearly says "By August 1947, further south in the district Jammu, a state-sponsored pogrom known as the "Jammu massacre" had commenced."
I tried the rewording and did a few more additions in my edits. Review them if you have time. — ] (]) 04:58, 24 February 2017 (UTC)


Also see: "In his book, The Pakistanis, ] notes that the violence in Jammu began in August 1947 and continued for about eleven weeks. Stephens claims that five lakh people were killed and two lakh went missing, with many women being abducted." ''']''' <sup>('']'')</sup> 10:55, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
== unfair reediting ==
can vamsee614 tell me why my edit is deleted? he has to explain how a hindu traitor gandhi's comments are needed in this page. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 07:55, 2 March 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: Because the edit was against the policies of Misplaced Pages. Please read ], ] and ] thoroughly. Regarding Gandhi, I will only say that it is a fallacious argument. — ] (]) 13:46, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
bullshit. why are you giving rules for everything? do you know that wikipedia is not all about rules? we should not follow rules strictly in wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:The_rules_are_principles
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Ignore_all_rules
gandhi was a pervert who used to sleep with young naked girls in his bed during his old age. he and his words deserves no respect from anyone. it has proof in wikipedia only.
https://en.wikipedia.org/Mahatma_Gandhi#Brahmacharya.2C_celibacy
now say? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 14:04, 2 March 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: Dear friend, please calm down and take a chill pill. There are reasonable standards that tell us when we can use ] and when we cannot. It must be used with commonsense to make a positive change in Misplaced Pages. I hope ] will help you. Since, I'm also a newbie in here and I'm not thorough with more technicalities & policies of Misplaced Pages, I'm pinging {{ping|Kautilya3}}, my senior and mentor, to say a word and help you on this matter.
: Regarding Gandhi, I know that he went crazy in that aspect of his personal life. But that has got nothing to do with his statesmanship and with what you have accused him of. So cool. Having said that, this is not a talk page related to Gandhi article and we're not supposed to discuss it here. So I'm ending it there. If you wish to discuss with me about that or any other subject, you can ping me on my talk page and I'll reply when I'm available. Strictly speaking, we're not allowed to discuss in such manner even there because any Misplaced Pages talk page ]. But since editors of Misplaced Pages do not get any reward for their contributions except pleasure and knowledge, I believe that editors can learn through discussions and sharing views in user talk pages, which will further contribute for a better Misplaced Pages. So I'll ignore this rule for you, as I think doing so will help in improving and ''maintaining'' Misplaced Pages, as the policy states.
: With that, I'll take a leave here. Have a nice day. :-) — ] (]) 16:12, 2 March 2017 (UTC)


: There are many many "sources". This is a contentious topic, where all kinds of views get presented and published by various contending parties. A balanced and ] discussion already exists in ] and ]. Please don't insert anything here that contradicts those pages.
:: Gandhi is a notable person, regarded as the father of the nation. His opinions are valued, and cited by scholars. So do we. I think that is all there is to be said. -- ] (]) 16:55, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
: The timeline previously existing on this page is rock solid. You can debate for months and you won't get anywhere. You will be simply wasting our time. -- ] (]) 11:01, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
I saw your talk pages. I understand you two already are friends connected by your pseudo liberal and anti national ideology. you are abusing army. you are threat to the nation. no matter how much you cry kashmir is an integral part of india. no power on earth can change that. one day army will take pok also. kautliya3 gandhi is the father of partition. he is not the father of india. he is the father of pakistan. he is a hindu traitor who broke great akhand bharat. all people know that. vamsee614 who wants to discuss with idiots like you? people like you are meant to be slammed not discussed. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 08:07, 3 March 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: See also ], where everything is catalogued. - ] (]) 11:02, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

::You are free to ] otherwise I will do that anyway. Remember that there is nothing called "]" on Misplaced Pages thus articles can be modified anytime.
== Sources unreliable ==
::Do you have any other explanation for content removal? There is no doubt that the Jammu massacre started in August 1947. ''']''' <sup>('']'')</sup> 11:13, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

::: ] requires that you study all the sources cited there and explain how your sources are supposed to override those. You can't "it is sourced" in a contentious topic. Please pay attention to ], and ]. -- ] (]) 11:18, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Scholar Ilyas Chattha ? How can be called a Scholar or a expert in the subject.He has done his PHD only in 2009 in the Universities of Warwick and Southampton, Dr Ilyas Chattha obtained a PhD in 2009 .Now there are thousands who have done there PHD all of them cannot be called a scholar.He was only a Lecturer not even a Professor. ] (]) 23:03, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
::::But where are your sources which claim Jammu massacre started only after October 1947? ''']''' <sup>('']'')</sup> 11:23, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

: See the policy on ]s. Is there particular content that you are objecting to? -- ] (]) 15:13, 19 March 2017 (UTC) ::::: This is what I mean by "wasting time". As per the ], 14 October is when the violence in Jammu started. See the sources. -- ] (]) 11:26, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

== FEW TENS OF THOUSANDS ==

someone please cite the source which gave this analysis. I didn't see that in any book. if it is not from a good source, it is someone's self synthesis(https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:What_SYNTH_is_not#SYNTH_is_not_useless) and has to be properly modified for better reliability. regards. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 15:16, 25 March 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

"To get a rough idea, if we assume that the first figure of 333,964 included the approximately 100,000 East Punjab refugees, we can estimate the number of Jammu Muslims killed to be a few tens of thousands." I was mentioning about this sentence. regards.

: There is already a discussion regarding this in this talk page. You might want to ] at it.
: Coming to the issue, its not written from any source. I understand your concern. But it was inserted to convey that 200,000+ Muslims killed, as indicated by many propagandist sources, is an exaggerated and technically impossible estimate. So the part "To get a rough idea" was added. Also it is not own synthesis, since we did not mention any figure. "a few tens of thousands" is a very vague wording. However if you can suggest a better modification for the sentence that sounds more appropriate, please feel free to do so. Thanks.
: By the way, since you also seem to have some idea on Misplaced Pages policies, you might be pleased to create a profile with a username and start editing, instead of using your IP. Cheers! — ] (]) 15:53, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

: IP, the essay you have quotes states, {{tq|To avoid this sort of error, we need a reliable source who has made the same inference, rather than having editors bring together disparate pieces of information themselves. This helps provide a clear solution to many content disputes.}}. A scholarly reference that makes the same kind of calculation (Copland) has been cited. So, your objection doesn't hold any water. However, Copland noted that the result is a surplus rather than a deficit, which doesn't make sense. Copland did not suspect that the Pakistani refugee figure could have included East Punjabi refugees that went through Jammu (said to be 100,000). If we deduct them, then we get a figure of about 10,000 killed. -- ] (]) 18:09, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

@kautilya it certainly holds water. Ian Copland's analysis does not have an estimate of "a few tens of thousands" in the book. The 10,000 estimate you are telling me is nowhere near accurate. The notional figure of 246,356 is a roughest estimate and the "at least 100,000 Muslim refugees of East Punjab" is also a vaguest number to take it to be precise for comparison with other numbers and find an estimate. however I am glad that you have the judgement to not put that 10,000 there. But the biggest problem is Ian Copland in the book which is cited there, tells that "we can safely say that the death toll is 80,000" in the same page 153. this figure is totally concealed while you are saying Ian Copland is the source to that estimate where instead a self made analysis is written. I did not add or remove any words. I just added a small tag to produce any reference if possible. you could have just said those words are added in good faith by self and removed my tag. but you have neither the right nor reason to ridicule my objection. regards. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </small>
: IP, I don't believe there was any ridicule in anything I have written. Neither was any ridicule meant.
: I believe all the estimates are based on the two Englishmen's estimates of 70,000 in seven incidents. The Two Englishmen were Horace Alexander and Richard Symonds. Most scholars and analysts take their figure as a rock solid one. There the matter ends, as far as Misplaced Pages is concerned. (Personally, I don't think all that much reliance can be placed on their estimates.) I don't have any objection to adding Ian Copland's estimate, which is in any case lower than Ved Bhasin's. -- ] (]) 19:44, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

@vamsee I don't know a better modification. I just wanted to check if there is a reference to those words and read that book. I read many books on this event but could not see any reliable number for deaths. different sources give different estimates. nobody really knows anything. again even the Ian Copland's 80,000 claim has no source or basis that he offers, while ironically he blames others for the same reason. all this is guessing business. so I cannot tell a better estimate. the range 50,000-100,000 in Misplaced Pages is actually a good estimate. more than that anyone cannot tell anything. i have some idea about wikipedia policies because i did a case study and project in my college on them. I don't want to come back with a profile since people here misunderstand me and treat me like a fool. thank you for responding to me with respect unlike the other person. regards. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 13:58, 26 March 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: Cool mate, calm down. And the thing with not using a profile is, every time you will appear from a different IP, as it seems to be happening in your case now. Anyways, your wish. Cheers! — ] (]) 04:27, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
{{od}} {{od}}
By the way, the so-called "losing control" happened in October. It was in reality a tactical withdrawal. The state forces had been strung along the border in penny pockets, and Army Chief ], who stepped down on 30 September, wrote in his final report that it was a problem because they won't be able to withstand sustained attacks. In October, orders were issued by Brigadier Rajendra Singh to withdraw them to fortified towns such as Poonch, Kotli, Mirpur, Bhimber and Jhangar. See
Apparently, all the state subjects that have migrated to Pakistan have a right to vote for AJK assembly elections.
* {{citation |last=Singh |first=K. Brahma |title=History of Jammu and Kashmir Rifles, 1820-1956: The State Force Background |publisher=Lancer International |ISBN=978-81-7062-091-4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=psTeAAAAMAAJ |year=1990 |ref={{sfnref|Brahma Singh, History of Jammu and Kashmir Rifles|1990}}}}
{{talkquote|Under the Act, displaced state subjects (''muhājarīn-e-riyāsat-e-jammū-o-kashmīr'') living in Pakistan elect representatives to twelve seats in the Assembly. ''These seats are not linked to residential electoral areas but rather are allocated according to constituencies based on the last district of residence in the former Princely State. Six of the seats are allocated for refugees displaced from the Kashmir Province and six for refugees displaced from the Jammu Province.''<ref>{{citation |last=Robinson |first=Cabeiri deBergh |title=Body of Victim, Body of Warrior: Refugee Families and the Making of Kashmiri Jihadists |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vGd3fS5_NvMC&pg=PA45 |year=2013 |publisher=University of California Press |isbn=978-0-520-27421-1 |pages=45–46 |ref={{sfnref|Robinson, Body of Victim, Body of Warrior|2013}}}}</ref>}}
So, somebody that has access to the number of voters should be able to bring the data, which we can add to the district populations. That will give us a better estimate of how many people died in the massacres. -- ] (]) 02:53, 28 March 2017 (UTC) On 6 October, the rebels launched attacks from across the border, and some of the "penny pockets" got caught in the fire. Some of them were rescued, and others succumbed. -- ] (]) 11:34, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
:Brahma Singh was an Indian military member and Lancer is an Indian military publication so this source cannot be treated as ].
: Even then, I think we'll never know how many of those people ''did not'' enroll for the voting in those elections. And that will remain as another dilemma. — ] (]) 10:08, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
:Now back to the actual topic. ] is a Misplaced Pages article. It cites this which cites a witness for saying Akalis and RSS were attacking the populace. Then it cites Ian Talbot which itself says: "{{tq|Indian authors are generally reticent concerning both the indigenous roots of the revolt of the Muslim inhabitants of Poonch and in August 1947 and the orgy of communal violence in Jammu province which was orchestrated by the state police and Dogra armed forces. The September 1947 communal massacres in Jammu province created a flood of over 80,000 Muslim refugees to neighbouring Sialkot in West Punjab.}}" The source has been falsified on Misplaced Pages, nothing else. ''']''' <sup>('']'')</sup> 11:49, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
:: Yes, but that is the reader's dilemma, not ours. We just report what is known. -- ] (]) 11:01, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
:: What policies state that Indian military publications cannot be treated as ]? We don't discount sources by nationality. Please don't bring in natinalities into the discussion. I cited Brahma Singh for Henry Lawrence Scott's report. Other sources have also mentiond the report. Brahma Singh also gives details of the orders issued for tactical withdrawal, and of the actual withdrawals. This is factual information and unless there are other sources that contradict it, the information is taken as valid. I am afraid your debating style here is bordering on ].

:: As for the main issue, you haven't read Talbot's footnote , which says:
{{reflist-talk}}
:: {{talkquote|The attacks on Muslim villages in Jammu province began in the ''middle of October''. Thousands of Muslims were killed at the hands of Dogra troops, members of the RSS and Sikh ''jathas''. The Pakistan Government's slant on these massacres can be found in Government of Pakistan, ''Kashmir Before Accession''.}}

:: which corroborates Luv Puri's 14 October date. -- ] (]) 15:15, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
== Districts ==
:::You can cite those reliable sources which are refuting the fact that Hari Singh wasn't losing control instead of citing an Indian military man who's book is published by an Indian military publisher which promotes Indian POV. See the thread at ] about it: ].

:::Footnote is not supposed to be considered over the article body. This footnote is particular about "Muslim villages" and Luv Puri is not claiming 14 October to be the when the first attack was carried out but has only cited an individual who remembered the attacks on 14 October.
{{ping|Vamsee614}} Please don't add wikilinks to the current day districts, because the 1947 districts were totally different. You can link to the town names if you wish. -- ] (]) 19:18, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
: {{done}} ] (]) 19:30, 27 March 2017 (UTC) :::Ian Talbot is very clear that violence against Muslims started before October 1947. ''']''' <sup>('']'')</sup> 15:49, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
:::: The "individual" is ], a former chief justice of the Azad Kashmir High Court, and the author of 2-volume history of the Kashmir conflict. A reliable source. Saraf also contradicts the information in British sources about some astronomical number of Jammu Muslims going to Sialkot by the end of September.

:::: {{talkquote|Mohammad Yosuf Saraf, former chief justice of the PAAJK High Court, says that by 10 October 1947, '''2,000 Muslims''' had migrated to Sialkot..{{sfnp|Puri, Across the Line of Control|2012|pp=25-26}}}}
== Sources ==
:::: Talbot doesn't give any sources for his 80,000 claim. It is likely that his sources confused the Punjab refugees that went through Jammu, as being Jammu refugees.

:::: There was absolutely no communal violence in Jammu in September. Jammu Brigadier as well as the police chief were Muslims, and the state's army chief and police chief were British officers. As per ], the sources that provide detailed information and analysis carry weight, rather than those giving passing mentions.
Please ensure all sources used are ] and you do not engage in ]. Try to represent scholarly consensus. ] (]) 23:08, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
:::: Lancer publishers is a reliable publisher of military affairs, used dozens of time all over Misplaced Pages. . -- ] (]) 16:33, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
: ] need to be used where they are available. Please read the guidelines.
:::::Lancer is not a reliable source per ] and you are free to remove it elsewhere. It cannot be used here.
: On the other hand, when they are not scholarly sources, I am happy to discuss any questions or doubts and reach a reasonable compromise. However, that discussion needs to happen here, not in edit summaries and edit wars. -- ] (]) 00:35, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
:::::So Luv Puri is not mentioning any date for the beginning of the violence. Anti-Muslim violence in September 1947 causing 80,000 refugees has been also cited by:
:: Hello {{U|Faizan}}, nobody was engaging in ] here. All the content was written from the sources cited, and the only debate is regarding the scholarship of the sources, no self analysis or synthesis was made. Now in , I particularly mentioned that the details of figures in the infobox shall be discussed in the body of the article, and need not be necessarily present in the box itself. We cannot have the "unverified" tag for a figure in the article permanently, it has to be resolved by reaching consensus on the talk page, or else the figure has to be removed. I have also requested not to add the tag in the infobox again by edit warring, and asked to discuss on talk page for any objections regarding the same. I'm not sure, even then, why you're unnecessarily engaging in edit warring! — ] (]) 00:58, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
:::::*{{cite book | last=Hassan | first=A. | title=Impact of Partition: Refugees in Pakistan: Struggle for Empowerment and State's Response | publisher=Regional Centre for Strategic Studies | series=RCSS policy studies | year=2006 | isbn=978-81-7304-698-8 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MnHaAAAAMAAJ | page=58|quote=The September 1947 communal massacre in Jammu and Poonch pushed over 80,000 Muslim refugees to West Pakistan.}}

:::::*{{cite book | last=Jansen | first=J.C. | last2=Lässig | first2=S. | title=Refugee Crises, 1945-2000 | publisher=] | series=Publications of the German His | year=2020 | isbn=978-1-108-83513-8 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=edX7DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA101 | language=et | quote=Less commented on is the role of the September 1947 massacres in Jammu and the flood of 80,000 Muslim refugees to neighboring Sialkot in West Punjab. | page=101}}
== April 2017 ==
:::::The violence did not start in September 1947. It started on August 1947 as per the sources I provided in the first message in this thread. ''']''' <sup>('']'')</sup> 17:12, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

:::::: Lancer is not a reliable source per what?
{{ping|Kautilya3}} Regarding of yours, how is it uncorroborated when the source itself clearly endorses and approves the observation? - — ] (]) 13:19, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
:::::: You need to start citing author names, instead of editors of books. Your second source is Ian Talbot again. The first source is not visible to me. So, please provide a quotiation, or don't, if it is another passing mention. All these claims of August violence go back to Ian Stephens, who is not a credible source for this topic. His wild and outlandish claims are already mentioned in the main page, with attribution. No scholar that has studied the issue in detail believes that "200,000 Muslims just disappeared".
: The "source" meaning the author, S. R. Bakshi? Die he author this appendix? Did he endorse it? Where? -- ] (]) 13:52, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
:::::: Indian scholars, by and large, did not study the internal happenings in Kashmir till recently. So, almost all the claims you see in the literature and generated from Pakistan, even if they are some times British sources in Pakistan. So, nobody knew that the systems put in place during the British Raj continued to be in place till the end of September, in particular the army chief and police chief continued, as did all their deputies in various towns. I don't see any western scholars being remotely aware of this fact. Some 100,000 Muslims from East Punjab and an equal number of non-Muslims from West Punjab passed through Jammu during August-September. They chose this route because it was safe. There was no violence happening there. Yoiu need to look at sources that have studied the subject in depth. For example, Snedden:

:::::: {{talkquote|Afzal Mirza, published in ''Dawn'' on 2 January 1951, states that Muslim refugees started entering Pakistan at the end of September 1947 in "small unnoticeable batches every day." It continued during October-November 1947. A total of 200,000 Muslims took refuge in Pakistan. This is called the "first wave."{{sfn|Snedden, What happened to Muslims in Jammu?|2001}}}}
:: {{talkquote|Just before the large-sale massacres in the Province got under way, the Maharaja himself toured about the villages with truck-loads of arms and ammunition following him, and personally held consultations with the local officials, distributed arms and in some cases fired the first shot. He was seen on this mission in Akhnoor, Bhimbar and Jammu tahsil and later in the Sambha, Kathua and Hiranagar tahsil.}}
:::::: {{talkquote|The communal riots took place in Jammu after instrument of accession was signed, after Sheikh Abdullah took over as head of administration – that is November. Some riots were taking place earlier also, but mass killings, when the convoys went to Pakistan and were butchered, happened when Sheikh Abdullah was head of the administration. He didn’t intervene or could not. I don’t know the reasons but perhaps his feeling was that the Muslims in Jammu were not his supporters.<ref>{{cite news |title=Riots changed J&K politics |newspaper=Kashmir Life |date=3 October 2009 |url=https://www.kashmirlife.net/riots-changed-jak-politics-768/ |accessdate=2014-10-31}}</ref>}}
:: Yes. There are the author's own words from the book. He is not quoting anyone there! — ] (]) 14:27, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
:::::: -- ] (]) 19:34, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

:::::::Lancer is not reliable per ].
::: In that case, why is this put into an appendix? Why doesn't the appendix have a title? Why is the appendix not referred to in the main body? And, why does it say (on p. 286):
:::::::Who is disputing that the violence did not start in August 1947? Just because one statement of ] is disputed it means nothing. The Misplaced Pages article has cited ] and you are doing the same but Snedden also agrees that violence in Jammu had already started in August 1947.
::: {{talkquote|I at once accepted the proposal for an impartial inquiry and asked the Prime Minister of Kashmir to nominate a representative for this purpose.}}
::::::*Snedden writes: "{{tq|The Maharaja and his armed forces moved to suppress this campaign. Around 15 August, they may also have begun to repress Muslims, by killing them or by forcefully disarming them. A 1948 publication stated that 'hundreds' of people in Bagh, a district in Poonch, were killed at a hoisting of the Pakistan flag to celebrate Independence Day. Two short telegrams to Jinnah on 29 August from the 'Muslims of Poonch' and the 'Muslims of Bagh' also spoke of anti-Muslim brutality by the Maharaja's forces around the same time. The Muslim Conference politician who became the foundation President of Azad Kashmir, Sardar Muhammad Ibrahim Khan from Rawalakot in Poonch, was quoted by a 1949 publication as stating that the Maharaja had unleashed a 'reign of terror on 24 August 1947 that killed 500 people. While the number of casualties cannot be confirmed, 'shoot-on-sight' orders were apparently issued to army officers on 2 September 1947.}}
::: The author, S. R. Bakshi, accepted a proposal from the Prime Minister of Kashmir? You are joking! -- ] (]) 14:45, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
::::::*Snedden also writes: "{{tq|In the period between 15 August and 26 October 1947, people and J&K took three significant actions that politically and physically divided J&K and instigated the continuing dispute over the state's international status: a Muslim anti-Maharaja uprising in Poonch; significant inter-religious violence in Jammy Province; and, the creation of Azad Kashmir in the areas of Jammy Province that the pro-Pakistan Muslims 'liberated'. These three actions occurred before Hari Singh's accession to India on 26 October 1947 and before either dominion or its military forced had officially entered J&K.}}"
::::::*There is also: {{cite book | last=Panayi | first=P. | last2=Virdee | first2=P. | title=Refugees and the End of Empire: Imperial Collapse and Forced Migration in the Twentieth Century | publisher=Palgrave Macmillan UK | year=2011 | isbn=978-0-230-30570-0 | url=https://books.google.co.in/books?id=8cCHDAAAQBAJ | quote=These Muslim localities presented a picture of destruction by mid-September 1947. Hundreds of Gujars were massacred in the Ram Nagar locality of the city of Jammu. By mid-September 1947, Jammy city's Muslim population was halved. | page=206}}
:::::::There is no doubt that the violence in Jammu had already started in August 1947. ''']''' <sup>('']'')</sup> 20:46, 1 December 2023 (UTC)


:::::::: A random thread on RSN that happens to mention Lancer doesn't become policy. If you want to get Lancer declared unreliable, start a thread on it, make your case, and invite people at ] to provide their input.
:::: No, ''you'' are joking! Liaquat Ali Khan accepted a proposal from the Prime Minister of Kashmir. The line you are quoting in taken from the para which is in inverted commas in the book, with clearly specifying at the top of the page as "''extract'' from the Premier of Pakistan's (means Pakistani Prime Minister's ) Broadcast, dated 4th November 1947." While it is not the case with the content I quoted. Those words are not in inverted commas, like the ones you quoted. How did you even miss this?
::::::::* The first source you mentioned (Snedden, Kashmir Unwritten History) talks about "Muslims of Poonch" and "Muslims of Bagh", not "Muslims of Jammu". It is entirely irrelevant. Neither does crushing an anti-state rebellion, if that is what it was, count as a "massacre".
:::: {{tq|why is this put into an appendix? Why doesn't the appendix have a title? Why is the appendix not referred to in the main body?}}: As you know, appendix is the section at the end of a book that gives ''additional information'' on the topic explored in the contents of the text. Appendix doesn't have a title or it is not referred to in the main body — doesn't mean it is not written by the author, or it is not a part of the book. The unquoted content in this appendix section ''is'' apparently written by the author of the book, since it is nowhere mentioned otherwise.
::::::::* The second source (Snedden, Understanding Kashmir), talks about three events/processes that happened between 15 August and 26 October. That does not imply every one of them started on 15 August. Was "Azad Kashmir" declared on 15 August?
:::: However, also, 'any primary content is observed in a source's appendix' does not alter the fact that it ''is observed'' by that source. I want to point out that, for due weight and a NPOV, I carefully added that content as a ''footnote'' and with attribution ({{tq|According to the accounts of refugees...}}), same as you added ] earlier. --- ] (]) 15:29, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
::::::::* The third source is authored by Chattha, whose name you have again ignored to mention. The source is . That is a Lahore newspaper run by the Muslim Leage state president of Punjab, Mian Iftikaruddin. How does the newspaper know what had happened in Jammu? And, how does this trump the ''Dawn'' report that Snedden has covered in detail?
::::: You are right, I missed the quotation part. So why is this appendix reproducing Pakistan prime minister's broadcast, but not the Indian prime minister's broadcast?
::::: And, why are words from it being reproduced in West Punjab government's "intelligence reports" (dated 1948) ? -- ] (]) 15:47, 24 April 2017 (UTC) :::::::: It is clear that you are not discussing in good faith, and are indeed wasting my time. So, I don't wish to continue this further. If you want to take this further, you can use ]. -- ] (]) 21:50, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
:::::::: By the way, Serena Hussain, the source , states that the "Jammu district" went from a Muslim-majority to a Muslim-minority district. The population statistics are given on the main page. Do you see "Jammu district" being "Muslim-majority"? And, she cites Chatta for this too, who is equally sloppy and inaccurate. -- ] (]) 21:55, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
:::::::::That RSN thread was not random. It involved multiple editors and I am going to abide by it until it has been overturned. Lancer cannot be used for disputing a far more reliable publication.
:::::::::"Jammu massacres" concerns ] which included Poonch, Bagh at the time when massacres happened. What Snedden noted is relevant to this massacre. Snedden himself considers these locations to be part of Jammu division as per his own statement: "Muslims from Poonch Jagir, and Mirpur District both located in western Jammu".
:::::::::Ilyas Chattha, the writer of ''Partition and Locality: Violence, Migration, and Development in Gujranwala and Sialkot, 1947-1961'', Oxford University Press, 2011, is not "sloppy and inaccurate".
:::::::::There would be a need of ] only if there is a sensible dispute. So far, you have only relied on your own views and debunked your own claims by citing sources that exactly contradict the narrative you are building up. First it was Ian Talbot and now that is Snedden.
:::::::::I am going to give you another opportunity to come up with a better explanation and prove how violence started only in October.
:::::::::Remember that you haven't provided even a single source for refuting the fact that massacre already started in August 1947. ''']''' <sup>('']'')</sup> 03:41, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
{{od}} {{od}}
The specific claim that Serena Hussain made was:
Ah, that's true! Seems like the whole appendix is taken from the reports and prints of West Punjab Government. Even the one that is in debate . Bakshi did not write it, I was terribly mistaken!
{{talkquote|... Muslims had gone from being a majority in the Jammu district to a minority (Chatta 2013)}}
But "Chatta 2013", which was actually an article he wrote for ''Pakistan Visions'' in 2009 titled "Terrible Fate..",<ref>{{cite journal |first=Illays |last=Chatta |title=Terrible Fate: `Ethnic Cleansing' of Jammu Muslims in 1947 |journal=Journal of Pakistan Vision |volume=10 |number=1 |year=2009 |publisher=Universty of Panjab |url=https://pu.edu.pk/images/journal/studies/PDF-FILES/Artical%20-%207.pdf |accessdate=2014-11-01 |ref={{sfnref|Chattha, Terrible Fate|2009}}}}</ref> doesn't have this claim. In fact, he presents a table showing the Muslim percentages in various districts, which tallies with our figures taken from the census records. So, she added her own ] and gave an improper citation, which doesn't do her any credit.


As for Chattha, he didn't make such glaring errors. So I take back the "inaccurate" comment about him, but the "sloppiness" comment stands. He was writing this article in 2009, where he cited the ''Pakistan Times'' information. But he didn't examine the ''Dawn'' information that Snedden has cited and analysed in detail.{{sfn|Snedden, What happened to Muslims in Jammu?|2001}} Chattha knew the Snedden article. His own article was written as a rejoinder to it. But he ignored available evidence which had already appeared in the scholarly literature. At a minimum, he should have mentioned it and explained why he discounted it. That is sloppiness.
But you did forgot to answer to this:
: However, also, 'any primary content is observed in a source's appendix' does not alter the fact that it ''is observed'' by that source. I want to point out that, for due weight and a NPOV, I carefully added that content as a ''footnote'' and with attribution ({{tq|According to the accounts of refugees...}}), same as you added ] earlier. — ] (]) 16:21, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
:: My policy is that I would only use primary sources to provide detail that may be missing in the secondary sources. If a secondary source has said the Maharaja distributed arms for massacres and we had an eye witness that provided details that were essential, then I would use it, but I wouldn't use the primary soruce on its own. The problem here is also that all the parties are heavily involved in the conflict and the incentives for selective presentation of material, for distortion of facts and to propagandise the whole thing are rather too many. We shouldn't touch this source with a barge pole. The Pakistan government had tons of Western reporters milling around during the Indo-Pakistan war. If they wanted their refugeess tales to be recorded, they could have easily thrown them open to neutral reporters. There was no need to publish a secretive, authorless "intelligence report" about it. Regarding my earlier footnote, please note that it was taken from a first person report published in a newspaper, not in a governmental propaganda document. The Indian government has in fact deliberately ignored and suppressed all the information about the victims of Mirpur and Rajouri. -- ] (]) 17:00, 24 April 2017 (UTC)


But all these reports are wrong. They took 100,000 East Punjab refugees who passed through Jammu in August–September, to be originating in Jammu itself. Whether that was an honest mistake or deliberate misinformation, I can't say. But it is pervasive throughout the Pakistani literature on Kashmir. In fact, Francis Mudie, the governor of West Punjab, cited it to the Commonwealth Relations Office in London. All the claims of "violence in Jammu during September" are based on this misinformation. -- ] (]) 22:51, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
::: Chattha, pg 183:
::: {{talkquote|There were reports that the Maharaja of the Dogra Hindu state was ‘''in person'' commanding all the forces’ which were ethnically cleansing the Muslims. (‘Elimination of Muslims from Jammu’, Part II, The Times (London) 10 August 1948, p. 5.)}}
::: This won't suffice? — ] (]) 19:19, 24 April 2017 (UTC)


Snedden says:
:::: No, because ''The Times'' report was written by a member of the Pakistan government, a fact that Chattha never bothered to check.Your best bet is to use Snedden. Snedden does use information from ''Kashmir before Accession'' but at least it is filtered through a reliable scholar. -- ] (]) 20:54, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
{{talkquote|The most plausible refugee figures are in a report titled 'Kashmir refugees in Pakistan' by Afzal Mirza, published in Dawn on 2 January 1951.}}
And Chattha completely ignores the report in his OUP-published thesis! I suppose OUP didn't send it to Snedden for peer review. -- ] (]) 23:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
:The source you have cited from Ilays Chatta is itself saying that Kashmiri Muslims were massacred throughout "August-October 1947". He cites "there were regular reports of ‘persecutions’ and ‘mass murders of Muslims" since August 1947.
:Scroll: "{{tq|Snedden cites a 1948 publication from West Punjab, based on refugee testimonies, recording 90 anti-Muslim incidents in Jammu and Kashmir between August 8 and December 12, 1947, with 118,459 alleged Muslims deaths and 13,360 abductions, with all incidents related to these deaths “involving state or Dogra troops”.}}"
:There is no dispute over the dating of the violence in Jammu which indeed started from August 1947.
:There is dispute only over the population figure and the total victims but I have not modified the victim figure on the infobox or lead. ''']''' <sup>('']'')</sup> 03:12, 3 December 2023 (UTC)


:: I didn't cite the source. Serena Hussain, your primary source for the August claim, cited it. And, she cited a blog post version (dated 2013). 2013 is when Chattha received his PhD. So, a 2009 publication would be student research, published in some no-name journal. And, no way does a newspaper op-ed published in 2023 settle any issues in a contentious topic like this.-- ] (]) 12:19, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
::::: I'm ready to drop this case in good faith, since I realised that the content is taken from a document published by Pakistan Government. But your arguments don't appear genuine to me. On one side you directly use primary content reported decades after the incident has occurred in local newspapers, and on the other hand you're objecting to the content reported in '']'' in 1948! ''The Times'' report was written by a Pakistani government's agent doesn't change the fact that it is published and reported by ''The Times''. And also, more importantly, the report has been cited widely by multiple scholarly RS including , with attribution. And you're saying we should brush it away completely without consideration, even to use as a secondary source for adding a mere footnote. — ] (]) 22:05, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
:::::: All right, go ahead and use ''The Times'' report. But then I will be adding content from State sources, Mahajan etc. to present their side of the picture. -- ] (]) 23:10, 24 April 2017 (UTC) :::Is there any source which disputes the information? I also cited Scroll.in which is not Chattha. As such this information remains unchallenged. ''']''' <sup>('']'')</sup> 15:53, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
{{od}}
Hahaha! This has become a kids fight. And no, I don't want the quality of this article to hit the bottom. I intend only in presenting facts and neutral versions, not focus extensively on ''sides of the picture''. So I will drop the case.

But before I leave, I just want to know for one last time: why exactly ] should stay in the article, but shouldn't? Both are the accounts of survivors and both are supported by newspaper reports. And it is not that even the newspaper reports which published the former accounts were holy writs. They just reproduced what a survivor wrote, as it is, after so many years. That doesn't give any special authenticity to that version. Rationally, is your position framed because of the logic — former is written primarily by the survivor Bal K. Gupta himself independently, while the latter is wholly the work of Pakistani agencies? Just clarify this for my satisfaction. Regards, ] (]) 05:36, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

: I added the first footnote because I mentioned Pakistani soldiers in the narrative and it got queried. Without the footnote, it would look like an unfounded allegation.
: For the same reason, it is ok to add ''The Times'' footnote to document the Maharaja's involvement. But once the Maharaja is put into the frame, his motivations and pressures also need to be explained. -- ] (]) 09:37, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

:: Oh fine. In that case, I don't think it will bring down the quality of the article. If not it improves the content. So I'm adding the footnote from ''The Times'' report. You can add and develop content on Hari Singh's side of the picture. — ] (]) 10:30, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

== May 2017 ==

{{ping|Kautilya3}} The Mirpur District page has a ] which describes what Mirpur District consisted of in 1947. So I linked it. --- ] (]) 19:09, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
: Ok, I linked it to the History section now. -- ] (]) 19:19, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

== Mirpur and Rajouri ==

I see that the editors are contesting the death toll estimates of Mirpur and Rajouri.
* As far as Mirpur is concerned, 20,000-dead is quite a good estimate based on all the available evidence. Das Gupta's book is internationally published and internationally reviewed. It is not reasonable to call it an "Indian source". Snedden hasn't looked into Mirpur and Rajouri as diligently as he looked at Jammu. The fact that ''he'' couldn't verify it doesn't mean much.
* For Rajouri, the information is scant, and the 30,000-dead estimate is from the Indian military but compiled by academics. It seems to be based on "open mass graves" found in the fields surrounding Rajouri, but insufficient detail has been provided, the demographic data doesn't support it (Rajouri district is currently 34% Hindu) and I haven't seen any survivor reports.
In November-December 1947, Horace Alexander and Richard Symonds were jointly commissioned by India and Pakistan to investigate the treatment of minorities in the conflict areas. Alexander went to the Indian-controlled areas and Symonds to the Azad areas. Unfortunately, while Alexander did his part, Symonds was more interested in finding out about the rebellion than about the plight of minorities.<ref>{{citation |last=Carnall |first=Geoffrey |title=Gandhi's Interpreter: A Life of Horace Alexander: A Life of Horace Alexander |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pxWrBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA219 |date=2010 |publisher=Edinburgh University Press |ISBN=978-0-7486-4185-7 |ref={{sfnref|Carnall, Gandhi's Interpreter: A Life of Horace Alexander|2010}}|p=216}}</ref> So we have lop-sided information from the two parts of the Jammu province. -- ] (]) 09:32, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
:: {{ping|Tyler Durden}} I'm afraid revert was not warranted. Gupta's credentials are irrelevant insofar as the source of the figure is concerned. On , he cites that number from ] and derives its accuracy from Indian government estimates of retreating refugees. Madhok, btw, was an RSS activist who was directly involved in that conflict on behalf of pro-Maharaja forces, so he would not satisfy ]. Keeping this in mind, the in-text attribution to Indian sources was therefore entirely appropriate. ''']''' (]) 20:04, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
::: I am afraid you are second-guessing a reliable source. If we were basing our information on Balraj Madhok, we would definitely attribute it. But we are basing it on Das Gupta. How he gets information and what he finds reliable and what he doesn't, is not our business. Unless you have a reliable source that contradicts the information, it is not proper to question it. -- ] (]) 22:13, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
:::: No, I'm not. The Gupta source as you can see clearly references Madhok and Indian government estimates for the 20k number. The figure is ''not'' from Gupta. Therefore ] is necessary. This is a basic requirement and non-debatable. If you have reliable sources showing otherwise, we can take a look. Until then, this is an Indian figure and it has to be clarified. ''']''' (]) 04:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
::::: What part of ] leads you to believe that this must be attributed? -- ] (]) 09:27, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
:::::: Kautilya3, the figure is sourced to an RSS activist ''and'' the Indian government. Neither fit ]. You are free to use Gupta's text but it is important for the readers to know where the info is coming from - a primary source. The same would be expected for a Pakistani figure. ''']''' (]) 12:23, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
::::::: There are three secondary sources given in the infobox, which I have now copied to the body as well: Snedden, Das Gupta and Khalid Hasan. Snedden and Das Gupta both give the 20,000 figure and base it on Balraj Madhok. Hasan balances Yusuf Saraf and a survivor's account (Bal K. Gupta). I think that is enough corroboration. Madhok's information is also presumably based on survivors' reports, because he was never in Mirpur himself.
::::::: The basic disagreements are:
:::::::* Saraf says there were 20,000 people in Mirpur, and the survivors say 25,000.
:::::::* Saraf knows that only a small number escaped with the State Forces. The survivors say 2,500. Madhok gives the figure of 2,000.
:::::::* Saraf doesn't say how many people survived from the Alibeg camp. The survivors say 1,600. These came via the Red Cross. So it is a public figure.
::::::: So all said and done, 20,000 dead is a reasonable estimate. The disagreements are minor. All parties know that prisoners were killed in the Alibeg camp. -- ] (]) 17:19, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
:::::::: Yes and no. Unfortunately the Hasan article is inaccessible. Bhagotra too isn't ] regarding the Mirpur violence. As far as Snedden is concerned, he said the figure came from (quote) an "unverifiable source". So that brings us to square one; Gupta quotes a figure, and that figure is from Madhok. For objectivity's sake, attribution to the Indian source is the correct thing to do, and what Misplaced Pages policy asks. You haven't yet explained your objection. ''']''' (]) 04:44, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
{{od}}
Since I was the one who removed the attribution, this is my view on it. I was aware that the figure was taken from an RSS activist ]. But in the citation, Gupta writes: {{tq|''This could be true'' because the Indian Government itself admits that only 3,600 refugees could come out with the retreating Dogra forces.}} (emphasis mine) To me, that's Gupta giving his stamp of approval to the figure, balancing all the information he has. And Gupta is a third-party source. Calling him an ''Indian source'' is inappropriate, as pointed above. So I think it should remain as a neutral figure. Regards, '''] ]''' 07:51, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
:: The "could be true" works both ways. And just to be clear, Gupta isn't the source of the figure as you admitted. So his approval (or lack thereof) remains entirely irrelevant. It's simply his job as a writer to conjecture whatever data is available to him, which is evident in the passage quoted. Even Snedden did that, rather discernably. Their quoting of the figure doesn't change it's ] source origin. Both authors have commented/referenced on the source as you can see; therefore, the in-text attribution isn't anything different. Hope this makes sense. ''']''' (]) 14:03, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
: @Mar4d, Khalid Hasan's article is reproduced in the Bal K. Gupta's book. I suppose you don't believe it. Here is an internet archive . It used to be here, but somehow it got removed.
: As for my "objection", I don't believe that if a reliable source cites an Indian source, then the reliable source itself becomes an "Indian source". That way, we would have to attribute everything sourced to Snedden as "Pakistani source". Both TD and I try to find as many sources as we can and cross-verify them. When there is consensus among them, we don't use attributions. So, what is needed here is to find contradicting information, if you can. Until you do so, this discussion is merely a waste of time. -- ] (]) 13:24, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
{{reflist-talk}} {{reflist-talk}}


== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 March 2024 ==
== Return of refugees ==


{{edit extended-protected|1947 Jammu massacres|answered=yes}}
{{ping|Kautilya3}} In the 'Population figures' section, can you please tell me why aren't we taking the official Jammu and Kashmir Government's figure of 200,000 to estimate the number of Jammu Muslims killed? :-P
The starting of the article looks heavily biased and tries to shift all the blame on Hindus , when the reality is they were the first ones to get massacred several times in the history of Kashmir , and also in the events leading upto 1947 aug massacre like the Rawalpindi and noakhali genocide . Also the Hindus of today's POK are extinct . 1947 Rawalpindi massacres https://g.co/kgs/n2GEJ7x ] (]) 19:00, 28 March 2024 (UTC)


] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a ] and provide a ] if appropriate.<!-- Template:EEp --> ] (]) 19:42, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
PS: I'm not saying that the people killed are about 100,000. All I'm saying is, I don't know, and I still cannot know. Even if today I don't ask this, tomorrow at some point of time, some reader will certainly raise this question. Regards, '''] ]''' 03:34, 6 June 2017 (UTC)


== The Tale of the massacre of 20,000–100,000 Muslims in Jammu ==
: Firstly, because the J&K Government is not THIRDPARTY and it had incentives to inflate the figures. Secondly, if 200,000 refugees are taken to have returned out of 333,000, then Pakistan would have only 133,000 refugees left and it is easy to find other data that contradicts it (e.g., Snedden). Frankly, I am surprised (and gladdened) to hear that 100,000 refugees returned. 200,000 would be quite a bit harder to believe. -- ] (]) 09:09, 6 June 2017 (UTC)


] I can see it. You reverted
:: {{tq|Firstly, because the J&K Government is not THIRDPARTY and it had incentives to inflate the figures}}: Do you mean, incentives from Indian government?
:: {{tq|Secondly, if 200,000 refugees are taken to have returned out of 333,000, then Pakistan would have only 133,000 refugees left and it is easy to find other data that contradicts it (e.g., Snedden)}}: Did Snedden/anybody particularly observe that there are more Jammu Muslim refugees in Pakistan after 1951 than 133,000?
:: {{tq|Frankly, I am surprised (and gladdened) to hear that 100,000 refugees returned.}} - Me too. — '''] ]''' 15:13, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
::: {{U|Kautilya3}}, This is what Snedden has to say:
::: {{talkquote|Certainly, a large number of Jammu Muslims, around 400,000, also fled to Pakistan or to the newly-formed Azad Kashmir, which had about 150,000 refugees. When these people left their homes in J&K, many thought that they were leaving temporarily and that they would soon return when the situation in and the subcontinent normalised. Few of these refugees ever returned home.}}
::: --- '''] ]''' 02:15, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
:::: Certainly, the return of the refugees has been a well-kept secret. I haven't seen anything about it in all the reliable sources I have skimmed through all these years. Saraf's book is gigantic, with a lousy index. It is hard to find information in it. It looks like Snedden didn't spot it.
:::: Saraf also gives the figures for voters in AJK elections, in which the refugees had voting rights. Based on those figures, he estimated about 500,000 refugees present in Pakistan in the 1970s. That number couldn't have grown from a base of 133,000 in 1950. The J&K government would have been prone to inflate its own achievements. There were also incentives of corruption, which apparently became rampant as soon as Sheikh Abdullah took over. Previously the officials might have been stealing from the people, but now they were also stealing from the state.
:::: For the time being, all I can say is that the 'headcount figure' seems reliable. The seeming inconsistency that found earlier is accounted for by the return of refugees. We need to continue looking for better data on the returned refugees. -- ] (]) 08:00, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
::::: Okay, fine. Thanks for the reply, '''] ]''' 08:13, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
:::::: {{ping|Kautilya3}} {{tq|Justice Yusuf Saraf estimates them (deaths) to be between 20,000 to 30,000.}} - For this content, you cited page number 133 of Saraf's book, while Evans, in his journal 'A departure from history: Kashmiri Pandits, 1990-2001', cited page number 841 for the same (citation 110 on p 37). Can you please re-check this? --- '''] ]''' 15:01, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
::::::: That is the page number in the 1979 edition. I will add it to the article. -- ] (]) 17:37, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
:::::::: I find it hilarious how Tyler Durden has been blocked. Fitting I'd say. Now for these ridiculous claims about Pakistani troops massacring Hindus, there is not one single credible piece of evidence provided in the article which states this. I've looked through the sources, and only 1 person claims this...Das Gupta. Where he found these claims, God only knows. And the claim about rape is nowhere to be found either. So I'm putting citations again on those claims until someone can prove without a shadow of a doubt. --] (]) 15:11, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
::::::::: Please note that ] applies to blocked editors as well. Attempting to disparage editors also won't go down well. And, why are you writing here in an old thread?
::::::::: What is here is a summary of the main article, ]. Have you looked at the sources there? Given how poor your source-checking is, as indicated in the section below, you need to be very careful in challenging verification for long-established content. It is highly ] to do so. -- ] (]) 20:50, 19 August 2017 (UTC)


There's a clear misinterpretation of the source. While there may have been some killings, there is no evidence of the massacre of 100,000 Muslims in Jammu. The author refers to this alleged widespread massacre as a tale.
== biased page ==


Direct quote of the author: “SOME WRITERS '''CLAIM''' THAT UP TO TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND MUSLIMS were killed in Jammu Province of Jammu and Kashmir soon after the partition of the Indian subcontinent in August 1947 '''They allege''' that
this page is a biased page. why there is so much more information about violence on muslims and very less information about violence on hindus and sikhs? onesidedly "killings were carried out by extremist Hindus and Sikhs" is there but no "killings done by extremists muslims" is there. the writers of this page are anti hindu bigots. please somebody look into this prejudiced page and delete it from wikipedia. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 10:07, 6 June 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
these Muslims were... '''the tale of a massacre of Muslims''' caused a chain of events...”<ref>Christopher Snedden (2001) What happened to Muslims in Jammu? Local identity, ‘"the massacre” of 1947’ and the roots of the ‘Kashmir problem’, South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 24:2, 111-134, DOI: 10.1080/00856400108723454</ref> ] ] 04:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

: Remember that the ] summarises the body and is not mere reproduction of what the sources say. Some sources at some point in time might have been unsure, there are plenty of other sources that exhibit definite knowledge, especially Ved Bhasin, although nobody can say for sure, how people might have been killed. You are looking an old source of Christopher Snedden, written in 2001. His later writings provide more information, and more concreteness, including the lowered estimate of 20,000-100,000, which we accept as a consensus view. -- ] (]) 07:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
:Dear Saffron if you bothered to look at the title of the page this is about Jammu massacres committed by non other than other saffron extremists you are free to create other pages related to unrelated events in mirpur or rojai. This is another example of people trying to push their religous agenda on an article. ] (]) 08:50, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
::Furthermore, Stormbird, the portion of the lead you added weasel words to was about the existence of the killings, not their magnitude; I'm not aware of scholars who claim killings did not occur, and if you have sources saying so you need to present them. ] (]) 18:18, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

== Merger proposal ==

I propose that ] be merged into ]. There's not point of having two articles. Or remove the Mirpur massacres from the Jammu massacres. One or the other. ] (]) 23:06, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
* '''Oppose''' - There is nothing unusual about a topic being summarised in a parent article, and given more detail in a separate article. The nom fails to state any reasons why ] should not be an independent article.
: This page covers the massacres that occurred throughout the ]. However, the majority of violence that occurred in the princely-ruled parts was ], even though it was apparently aided and abetted by the princely regime. But the violence in the rebel areas was characteristically different. Almost the entire population of religious minorities was massacred after the rebels took control. In Mirpur, 20,000 out of 25,000 minorities were killed. That is a different topic, different setting, and different actors. I see no reason to merge. -- ] (]) 21:21, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

::This is not a summary this is several thousand words which are enough for an independent article itself and has obvious agendas of Hindus who wish to muddy the waters about the Jammu massacre. ] (]) 08:36, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

== Dubious claims - citations required ==

*''Many Hindus and Sikhs, on and after 25 November 1947 gathered in Mirpur for shelter and protection were killed by the Pakistani troops'' ''and tribesmen''.
Where did "Pakistani troops" come from? None of the sources provided even claim this. Pakistan didn't even have a proper army in November 1947 anyway.

*''Mass rape and abduction of women was also reported'' .
There is no proof of this either from the sources.

The only source that claims "Pakistani troops" is Das Gupta, a reknowned pseudohistorian and Indian propagandist. He himself offers no clues as to the source of his information. It seems like he just woke up one day and decided to write an article.
--] (]) 15:08, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

: ], p.56:
: {{talkquote|The Indian ''White Paper'' discusses one incident of violence and kidnapping in and around Mirpur on 25 November 1947, with 'Pathans' the perpetrators. A further alleged--and, if true, abysmal--incident of anti-Hindu violence took place in Mirpur. This was the 'liquidation of over twenty thousand non-Muslims on and after 25 November 1947 out of a total twenty five thousand' gathered in Mirpur for shelter and protection. A 'greatly shocked' Sardar Ibrahim painfully confirmed that some Hindus were 'disposed of' in Mirpur in November 1947, although he does nto mention any figures.}}
: Das Gupta, p.97:
: {{talkquote|Whereas the migration of the Muslims from the Jammu area was quite impressive, the beleaguered non-Muslims in Bhimber, Rajauri, Kotli, Mirpur and Deva Vatala had to face total annihilation in the early stages of occupation by elements coming from Pakistan. In particular, the town of Mirpur saw the liquidation of over twenty thousand non-Muslims on and after 25 November 1947 out of a total of twenty-five thousand, inclusive of refugees, who had taken shelter there from other areas.}}
: ], narrating the testimony of Bal K. Gupta:
: {{talkquote|Around November 25, 1947, there were nearly 25,000 Hindus and Sikhs living in Mirpur. During the city's capture, close to 2,500 were killed in the infernos that erupted due to Pakistani artillery fire. Another 2,500 escaped with the retreating Jammu and Kashmir army. The remaining 20,000 were marched in procession towards Alibeg. Along the way, '''Pakistani troops and Pathans''' killed about 10,000 of the captured Hindu and Sikh men and ''kidnapped over 5,000 women''. The 5,000 Hindus and Sikhs who survived the 20-mile trek to Alibeg were imprisoned. In March 1948, the Red Cross rescued 1,600 of the survivors from Alibeg. Between 1948 and 1954, around 1,000 abducted Hindu and Sikh women were recovered from Pakistan and Azad Kashmir.}}
: If you want more detail about the Pakistani troops, here it comes:<ref>{{citation |last=Bhagotra |first=R. K. |chapter=Escape from Death Seven Times |title=Ibid |year=2013 |origyear=first published in ''The Tawi Deepika'', 1987 |pages=123–125 }}</ref>
: {{talkquote|One evil looking Pakistani announced that our days of living were over. They would kill all of us ''Kafir'' Hindus (infidels) with a butcher's knife. But he yelled that number 18th and 19th have to do a simple task of lifting the dead bodies and throwing them in the canal....}}
: {{talkquote|On December 20, 1947 evening, four days after the above episode, '''Pakistani soldiers''' grabbed 13 young men and took them to the canal. We were again made to remove our clothes and lie down... The Pakistani butcher went reciting Kalma and slaughtering Hindu boys and we kept on throwing the dead bodies in the canal. After both of us had thrown the body of 11th person in the canal, we laid down on the ground for our turn. Time was same as four days ago but the sky was clear and I closed my eyes for my turn.}}
: {{talkquote|Suddenly, we heard a commanding voice asking why soldiers were killing the boys. Another introduced him as Sardar Mohammed Ibrahim, President of Azad Kashmir Government. Then, I opened my eyes and saw that the butcher got up and saluted the Sardar and bowed his head in front of him. The butcher replied that he was a '''soldier of Pakistan''', follower of its president Mohammed Ali Jinnah and was following the orders of his superiors.}}
: The boy who narrates this story was the son of a lawyer in the Mirpur district court, whom Sardar Ibrahim regarded as a personal friend. -- ] (]) 17:11, 19 August 2017 (UTC)


{{reflist-talk}} {{reflist-talk}}


== How Maharaja Hari Singh can accused of mentioned crimes without any proof or reference ==
:*We should not be using Bal K. Gupta because it is a self-published source. Also, since it would appear that Snedden's book amounts to a revisionist view of what went on, I think we need to highlight that in some way. - ] (]) 05:04, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
::: We are not usingn Bal K. Gupta. We are using previously published articles that he included in appendices. I can also tell you that we cross-compared the surviver accounts with ], and they are consistent with each other. Ibrahim says that he ordered that nobody should be killed in the Alibeg camp, but they continued to be killed. So the guards at the camp were not following his orders. -- ] (]) 11:27, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
:::: Previously published by whom? Where? Why not cite them directly? And we're not qualified to "cross-compare" - that is for secondary sources to do, I think. I have absolutely no knowledge of the subject matter but the sourcing seems suspect, at least per our policies. Sneddon's book, certainly, caused a bit of a ruckus. - ] (]) 12:09, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
::::: As the citation above says "first published in ''The Tawi Deepika''". See ]. I don't know of any ruckus about the Snedden's book. I have been using almost ever since it got published. -- ] (]) 16:16, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
:::::: The only non-biased source here is Snedden, and he doesn't say anything about any Pakistani troops. Please explain to me which "army" Pakistan had in 1947? Das Gupta and that other guy are not credible or neutral sources. --] (]) 14:55, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
::::::: It makes no difference whether you think some source is "credible or neutral". What matters is whether it is ]. By Misplaced Pages policy, it is. You haven't given any evidence that it is not reliable. And, who is "the other guy"? -- ] (]) 16:01, 22 August 2017 (UTC)


In this article how can you accuse Maharaja Hari Singh of the mentioned crimes without showing any references or proofs. This article is trying to tarnish his name and glory. I am requesting to remove his name from the mentioned allegations if there is no concrete evidence.] (]) 19:40, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
== Flooding of article with an unrelated event ==

<s>This article has had more information relating to a event in Mirpur and other places than the event the article is supposed to be about considering those events have seperate pages and links to them this is undue and is obviously an attempt by people with a certain agenda to try and dilute the Jammu genocide by comparing to an unrelated event elsewhere. The murpir article itself does not even mention the much larger genocide which occurred BEFORE the mirpur event. We need editors who do not have bias or a certain agenda to assess this article and any additions of a unrelated issue must be discussed first ] (]) 08:40, 16 November 2017 (UTC)</s><small>sock of a ].</small>
:Hello {{ping|2A02:C7D:151D:D100:7871:7BC2:3DB8:7A1C}}! I noticed that you have left a note on my talk page. Although I do agree with you that unrelated events should be removed, the second last sentence of the general information should be kept, as it appears to be caused by this or is part of same conflict as this. While I do apologise in being too stern, I would also like to say that when you do make a comment such as above in the talk page, can you please discuss it before removing? This allows for a general consensus to be reached, and bold edits such as the ones you have done are flagged as highly likely to be vandalism/bad faith edits on the wikipedia filter. Thanks! ] (]) 21:49, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

== Jammu, Mirpur and Rajouri ==

During the last few days, a whole bunch of IPs and at least one registered editor, have started raising issues about Mirpur and Rajouri information covered here. They have also made ]y edits at ], ] and ]. These edits and the consequent edit-warring do not achieve anything. Please discuss the issues here.

"Jammu" In this article refers to the Jammu province (of the princely state), of which Mirpur and Rajouri were very much a part. But {{U|Tyler Durden}} (who wrote most of the content here) was also aware that the majority of the violence happened in the Jammu and Kathua districts, and that is where most of the content is focused. Mirpur and Rajouri are mentioned in brief summaries.

The reverse comparison is not valid. Mirpur and Rajouri were not "provinces". The discussion of those events covers the respective cities and their surrounding areas. There is no reason for those articles to cover the Jammu events, unless it is established that the two were linked. Mirpur and Rajouri were rather linked to the ]. -- ] (]) 16:36, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

== Poor quality edits ==

{{U|JosephusOfJerusalem}}, this is a difficult and painful subject. I request you not to make POV edits and fight silly games. Changing "scholar" to "historian" and adding ], labelling her as "historians", is precisely that kind of a game.
* Illyas Chattha is a greenhorn that barely got his PhD. It is adequate to describe him as a "scholar". We can reserve labels like "historian" for Ian Copland and Christopher Snedden who have done much more fact-checking than Chattha sees the need for. Here is an example of his statements:
:{{talkquote|As the shadow of Partition fell over J&K, over one million Muslims were uprooted and an estimated 250,000-300,000 were massacred in Jammu province alone between September and November 1947.{{sfn|Chattha, The Long Shadow of 1947|2016|p=145}}}}
:Take a deep breath! One million Muslims! From a little province like Jammu, whose total population in 1947 was just about one million. The total Muslims over there in 1947 was no more than half a million. And, a good majority of them are still there, as the ] section shows.
* Tunzelmann does not even have a PhD. She is more of a popular book writer, even film-writer, that specialises in historical topics. Everybody that writes anything historical gets to be called a "historian" in popular parlance. Our meaning of "historian" is much more specialised, as defined in ].

First of all, I would like to ask why you find the need to cite such poor-quality sources when scholars like Copland and Snedden have been cited here.

Secondly, why do you make claims like "{{tq|Historians explain that India had supplied the Dogra troops with weapons}}" when even the poor-quality source you have added only says "perhaps because it had secretly been providing arms to the Dogra side". Tunzelmann might believe that she has access to "secrets" that none of us aware of, but there is enough documentation available to disprove such theories. And, even if India did supply weapons, what then? How else is the State supposed to get weapons? Does Tunzelman not know that the State was just about face a massive invasion from Pakistan? What does all this have to do with the subject of this article?

You write "{{tq|The proportion of Muslims in the Jammu city altogether halved by the middle of September due to killings and displacement}}". The phrase "due to killings and displacement" is not in the source. That is your ]. In fact the page you have cited also talks about "anticipatory exodus". And, Chattha's source for this statement is '']'', which had been in existence for less than a year by September 1947. How much reliance can one place on such a newspaper in such contentious and troubled times? Christopher Snedden, on the the hand, uses '']'', a much more established newspaper.

The page has been perfectly well-balanced and high quality before your contributions. I don't see much value that you are adding. I suggest that you first read the article and its sources thoroughly before attempting to make any modifications. As I said this is a difficult subject. -- ] (]) 23:41, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

{{od}}If would be quite a ] to describe someone with in history as just a scholar. Tunzelman is also a known historian with a qualification in history, unless of course you have a source which says otherwise. If you don't agree I can take it to ].

Of course if you have sources which contradict Tunzelman and Chattha on Indian (or Patiala, by then a part of India) supplies and the Indian denial of this holocaust which Tunzelman says ''followed'' from their supplies of weapon to the Dogra state you may have an argument. The rest is ] argumentation.

The ] argument is invalid because Chattha's next sentence explicitly mentions ″killings and dispersal″. There is no need for hairsplitting here. The age of newspapers reporting current events is irrelevant in so far as their reliability is concerned. ] (]) 00:32, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
:A lot of new researches and modifications take place especially when old incidents are concerned, hence the age of newspaper is relevant. -- <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </small>

:: Josephus, "scholar" is ] for Misplaced Pages. My assessment is that Chattha is a scholar, though yet inexperienced. For example, in a later article he analysis the partisan coverage of the newspapers,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Chattha |first1=Ilyas |title=Partisan Reporting: Press Coverage of the 1947 Partition Violence in the Punjab |journal=South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies |volume=36 |issue=4 |year=2013 |pages=608–625 |issn=0085-6401 |doi=10.1080/00856401.2013.819829}}</ref> in the light of which his overreliance on ''Pakistan Times'' and ''Nawa-i-Waqt'' is questionable.
:: As for Tunzelman, I would classify her as a 'writer', not a scholar. Her biography says that she 'read history', which basically means that she got a degree in history. She does not mention whether it was a BA or MA. {{U|MPS1992}}, can you take a look?
:: The paragraph you are using from Chattha is problematic. The first citation is for mid-September. The second is for 20 November and the third is for 29 October. The events have been listed in jumbled order. Since the situation in J&K was very fluid and dynamic at this time, one month is a long time. So the paragraph is combining apples and oranges, and mixing them all up.
:: The idea that the Jammu city's Muslim population was halved by mid-September is contradicted by for example ]:
:: {{talkquote|Mohammad Yosuf Saraf, former chief justice of the PAAJK High Court, says that by 10 October 1947, 2,000 Muslims had migrated to Sialkot.{{sfn|Luv Puri, Across the Line of Control|2013}}}}
:: Until 4 October, both the Army chief and the Police chief of the State were British officers. It is highly unlikely that any large-scale killings took place during their tenure. Jammu city's Superintendent of Police was Muslim too, until he was dismissed around 20 October. All sources agree that major violence occurred between 20 October and 10 November. -- ] (]) 16:32, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
{{reflist-talk}}

Latest revision as of 19:33, 22 December 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1947 Jammu massacres article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months 
This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconCrime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconDeath Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconDisaster management Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconIndia: Jammu and Kashmir Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Jammu and Kashmir (assessed as High-importance).
Note icon
This article was last assessed in September 2016.
WikiProject iconLaw Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconLaw Enforcement Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Asian / Indian / South Asia / Cold War C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
CThis article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation: criterion not met
  2. Coverage and accuracy: criterion met
  3. Structure: criterion met
  4. Grammar and style: criterion met
  5. Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Asian military history task force
Taskforce icon
Indian military history task force
Taskforce icon
South Asian military history task force
Taskforce icon
Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)
WikiProject iconSociology Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The contents of the 1947 Mirpur massacre page were merged into 1947 Jammu massacres on 20 August 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

Bibliography

This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived.
  • Since republished as Chattha, Ilyas (2011). Partition and Locality: Violence, Migration and Development in Gujranwala and Sialkot 1947–1961. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199061723.

March 2023

Regarding this revert, I fail to understand what part was “far too liberal” paraphrasing. In fact, quite the contrary, the current wording seems to be a misrepresentation of the source. UnpetitproleX (talk) 12:12, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 17 March 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I would like to add the following text to the "Violence against Jammu Muslims" section based on the book Kashmir, 1947: Rival Versions of History by Prem Shankar Jha. (ISBN: 9780195648584, Publisher: Oxford University Press, Pages cited: 11-12). Please add the following to the third paragraph in the section "Violence against Jammu Muslims". Text to be added as follows:

However, alternately, Prem Shankar Jha states in his book Kashmir, 1947: Rival Versions of History, "That while there were undoubtedly atrocities committed by bands of Sikhs and by some of the state troops against Muslims in the border belt of Jammu province in the first weeks of October, these were caused by an overspill into the state of the communal carnage occurring all along its borders in East and West Punjab, and overreaction and loss of control by the state forces in the face of atrocities committed by Muslims on Hindus both within Jammu & Kashmir state and in the adjoining areas of west Punjab, where only slightly less than half the population was Hindu and Sikh. While this was certainly no justification, Pakistan's charge that state troops were 'cleansing' the state of its 77 percent Muslim population in order to enable the Maharaja to accede to India is wholly unsustainable. Had this been his intention, he would have first 'cleansed' his 8,000-strong state force of its almost 3,000 Muslims and not waited for them to kill their officers before deserting to the enemy on 23-5 October. That the raids into Kashmir by the Pathan tribesmen were not spontaneous retaliation aimed at saving their Muslim brethren from the Dogra genocide but were carefully planned and instigated at least from the end of August or early September, i.e., a whole month before any of the alleged atrocities by the Kashmir state troops against Muslims in the border region took place, at a time when Kashmir was completely peaceful." Pbeditwiki (talk) 14:52, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

 Not done for now: Quoting such a large section directly is discouraged, especially when it is not essential to the article. Please rewrite to meet the relevant WP:MOS guidelines. Remember to avoid direct paraphrasing and instead write your own summary. Feel free to re-open this request when appropriate. Actualcpscm (talk) 15:13, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Thank you @Actualcpscm I've re-written the following text to the "Violence against Jammu Muslims" section based on the book Kashmir, 1947: Rival Versions of History by Prem Shankar Jha. (ISBN: 9780195648584, Publisher: Oxford University Press, Pages cited: 11-12). Please add the following to the third paragraph in the section "Violence against Jammu Muslims". Text to be added as follows:
Journalist Prem Shankar Jha states in his book Kashmir, 1947: Rival Versions of History, "That while there were undoubtedly atrocities committed by bands of Sikhs and by some of the state troops against Muslims in the border belt of Jammu province in the first weeks of October, these were caused by an overspill into the state of the communal carnage occurring all along its borders in East and West Punjab."
W. F. Webb was the British political agent in Kashmir during the 1947 and reported fortnightly to Crown representative of the state i.e. Viceroy. He reported in his September 1946 that Kashmir as a whole remained virtually untouched by the 'Direct Action' program launched by Jinnah in British India. His report for December 1946 reported that even the arrival of 2,500 Hindu and Sikh refugees from the tribal agency of Hazara did not cause any communal tension in Kashmir. When the communal violence started in Punjab in 1947, Maharaja Hari Singh sent more troops to Kashmir-Punjab border to ensure no trouble makers enter the territory from Punjab. This was reported by Reuters from Srinagar.
Maharaja Hari Singh has been wrongly accused of ethnic cleansing of Muslim population, as his 8,000-strong state force had almost 3,000 Muslims so how can such ethnic cleansing be carried out without cleansing the state force first. Also the raids into Kashmir by the Pathan tribesmen were not spontaneous retaliation aimed at saving their Muslim from the Dogra genocide but were carefully planned and instigated at least from the end of August or early September, i.e., a whole month before any of the alleged atrocities by the Kashmir state troops against Muslims in the border region took place, at a time when Kashmir was completely peaceful." Pbeditwiki (talk) 16:28, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

References

  1. Jha, Prem Shankar (1998). Kashmir, 1947: Rival Versions of History. Oxford University Press. pp. 11–12. ISBN 9780195648584.

INA

We need better sources for involvement of INA, AD, etc. TrangaBellam (talk) 23:45, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

@TrangaBellam: It is already noted at 1947 Jammu_massacres#Observations with about 4 sources.
It is easy to find more reliable sources such as, "there began a wholesale massacre of Muslims in Jammu masterminded by the elements in the State Forces, the RSS, and former members of the Indian National Army", or "Muslims were massacred in Poonch and Jammu by the soldiers of the princely kingdom along with RSS and Akali Dal cadres".
This information is not new. This 1952 source writes: "It continued at Bagh in Poonch when on 26 August State troops set on Muslims who had disobeyed an order forbidding the observance of 'Pakistan Day' (15 August). It increased in tempo to spread to Jammu Province in September and October, with the infiltration of the RSS, Akali Sikhs, and members of the Indian National Army from India." Aman Kumar Goel 05:09, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
By the INA it doesn't mean the organization but ex soldiers or serviceman, INA Muslim servicemen and members fought for pakistan and kashmiris such as zaman kiani and many hindu aswell sikh serviceman of INA served with Sikh groups and RSS 39.43.141.153 (talk) 14:36, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Dating

@Kautilya3: How these are not a part of Jammu massacre? The source clearly says "By August 1947, further south in the district Jammu, a state-sponsored pogrom known as the "Jammu massacre" had commenced."

Also see: "In his book, The Pakistanis, Ian Stephens notes that the violence in Jammu began in August 1947 and continued for about eleven weeks. Stephens claims that five lakh people were killed and two lakh went missing, with many women being abducted." Aman Kumar Goel 10:55, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

There are many many "sources". This is a contentious topic, where all kinds of views get presented and published by various contending parties. A balanced and WP:NPOV discussion already exists in 1947 Poonch Rebellion and Indo-Pakistani War of 1947-1948. Please don't insert anything here that contradicts those pages.
The timeline previously existing on this page is rock solid. You can debate for months and you won't get anywhere. You will be simply wasting our time. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:01, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
See also Timeline of the Kashmir conflict, where everything is catalogued. - Kautilya3 (talk) 11:02, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
You are free to fix those articles otherwise I will do that anyway. Remember that there is nothing called "deadline" on Misplaced Pages thus articles can be modified anytime.
Do you have any other explanation for content removal? There is no doubt that the Jammu massacre started in August 1947. Aman Kumar Goel 11:13, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
WP:NPOV requires that you study all the sources cited there and explain how your sources are supposed to override those. You can't "it is sourced" in a contentious topic. Please pay attention to WP:DUE, and WP:WEIGHT. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:18, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
But where are your sources which claim Jammu massacre started only after October 1947? Aman Kumar Goel 11:23, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
This is what I mean by "wasting time". As per the Timeline of the Kashmir conflict, 14 October is when the violence in Jammu started. See the sources. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:26, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

By the way, the so-called "losing control" happened in October. It was in reality a tactical withdrawal. The state forces had been strung along the border in penny pockets, and Army Chief Henry Lawrence Scott, who stepped down on 30 September, wrote in his final report that it was a problem because they won't be able to withstand sustained attacks. In October, orders were issued by Brigadier Rajendra Singh to withdraw them to fortified towns such as Poonch, Kotli, Mirpur, Bhimber and Jhangar. See

On 6 October, the rebels launched attacks from across the border, and some of the "penny pockets" got caught in the fire. Some of them were rescued, and others succumbed. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:34, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Brahma Singh was an Indian military member and Lancer is an Indian military publication so this source cannot be treated as WP:RS.
Now back to the actual topic. Timeline of the Kashmir conflict is a Misplaced Pages article. It cites this source which cites a witness for saying Akalis and RSS were attacking the populace. Then it cites Ian Talbot which itself says: "Indian authors are generally reticent concerning both the indigenous roots of the revolt of the Muslim inhabitants of Poonch and in August 1947 and the orgy of communal violence in Jammu province which was orchestrated by the state police and Dogra armed forces. The September 1947 communal massacres in Jammu province created a flood of over 80,000 Muslim refugees to neighbouring Sialkot in West Punjab." The source has been falsified on Misplaced Pages, nothing else. Aman Kumar Goel 11:49, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
What policies state that Indian military publications cannot be treated as WP:RS? We don't discount sources by nationality. Please don't bring in natinalities into the discussion. I cited Brahma Singh for Henry Lawrence Scott's report. Other sources have also mentiond the report. Brahma Singh also gives details of the orders issued for tactical withdrawal, and of the actual withdrawals. This is factual information and unless there are other sources that contradict it, the information is taken as valid. I am afraid your debating style here is bordering on WP:BATTLEGROUND.
As for the main issue, you haven't read Talbot's footnote , which says:

The attacks on Muslim villages in Jammu province began in the middle of October. Thousands of Muslims were killed at the hands of Dogra troops, members of the RSS and Sikh jathas. The Pakistan Government's slant on these massacres can be found in Government of Pakistan, Kashmir Before Accession.

which corroborates Luv Puri's 14 October date. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:15, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
You can cite those reliable sources which are refuting the fact that Hari Singh wasn't losing control instead of citing an Indian military man who's book is published by an Indian military publisher which promotes Indian POV. See the thread at WP:RSN about it: Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 342#Valid Sources?.
Footnote is not supposed to be considered over the article body. This footnote is particular about "Muslim villages" and Luv Puri is not claiming 14 October to be the when the first attack was carried out but has only cited an individual who remembered the attacks on 14 October.
Ian Talbot is very clear that violence against Muslims started before October 1947. Aman Kumar Goel 15:49, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
The "individual" is Muhammad Yusuf Saraf, a former chief justice of the Azad Kashmir High Court, and the author of 2-volume history of the Kashmir conflict. A reliable source. Saraf also contradicts the information in British sources about some astronomical number of Jammu Muslims going to Sialkot by the end of September.

Mohammad Yosuf Saraf, former chief justice of the PAAJK High Court, says that by 10 October 1947, 2,000 Muslims had migrated to Sialkot..

Talbot doesn't give any sources for his 80,000 claim. It is likely that his sources confused the Punjab refugees that went through Jammu, as being Jammu refugees.
There was absolutely no communal violence in Jammu in September. Jammu Brigadier as well as the police chief were Muslims, and the state's army chief and police chief were British officers. As per WP:CONTEXTMATTERS, the sources that provide detailed information and analysis carry weight, rather than those giving passing mentions.
Lancer publishers is a reliable publisher of military affairs, used dozens of time all over Misplaced Pages. . -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:33, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Lancer is not a reliable source per ] and you are free to remove it elsewhere. It cannot be used here.
So Luv Puri is not mentioning any date for the beginning of the violence. Anti-Muslim violence in September 1947 causing 80,000 refugees has been also cited by:
The violence did not start in September 1947. It started on August 1947 as per the sources I provided in the first message in this thread. Aman Kumar Goel 17:12, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Lancer is not a reliable source per what?
You need to start citing author names, instead of editors of books. Your second source is Ian Talbot again. The first source is not visible to me. So, please provide a quotiation, or don't, if it is another passing mention. All these claims of August violence go back to Ian Stephens, who is not a credible source for this topic. His wild and outlandish claims are already mentioned in the main page, with attribution. No scholar that has studied the issue in detail believes that "200,000 Muslims just disappeared".
Indian scholars, by and large, did not study the internal happenings in Kashmir till recently. So, almost all the claims you see in the literature and generated from Pakistan, even if they are some times British sources in Pakistan. So, nobody knew that the systems put in place during the British Raj continued to be in place till the end of September, in particular the army chief and police chief continued, as did all their deputies in various towns. I don't see any western scholars being remotely aware of this fact. Some 100,000 Muslims from East Punjab and an equal number of non-Muslims from West Punjab passed through Jammu during August-September. They chose this route because it was safe. There was no violence happening there. Yoiu need to look at sources that have studied the subject in depth. For example, Snedden:

Afzal Mirza, published in Dawn on 2 January 1951, states that Muslim refugees started entering Pakistan at the end of September 1947 in "small unnoticeable batches every day." It continued during October-November 1947. A total of 200,000 Muslims took refuge in Pakistan. This is called the "first wave."

The communal riots took place in Jammu after instrument of accession was signed, after Sheikh Abdullah took over as head of administration – that is November. Some riots were taking place earlier also, but mass killings, when the convoys went to Pakistan and were butchered, happened when Sheikh Abdullah was head of the administration. He didn’t intervene or could not. I don’t know the reasons but perhaps his feeling was that the Muslims in Jammu were not his supporters.

-- Kautilya3 (talk) 19:34, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Lancer is not reliable per Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 342#Valid Sources?.
Who is disputing that the violence did not start in August 1947? Just because one statement of Ian Stephens is disputed it means nothing. The Misplaced Pages article has cited Christopher Snedden and you are doing the same but Snedden also agrees that violence in Jammu had already started in August 1947.
  • Snedden writes: "The Maharaja and his armed forces moved to suppress this campaign. Around 15 August, they may also have begun to repress Muslims, by killing them or by forcefully disarming them. A 1948 publication stated that 'hundreds' of people in Bagh, a district in Poonch, were killed at a hoisting of the Pakistan flag to celebrate Independence Day. Two short telegrams to Jinnah on 29 August from the 'Muslims of Poonch' and the 'Muslims of Bagh' also spoke of anti-Muslim brutality by the Maharaja's forces around the same time. The Muslim Conference politician who became the foundation President of Azad Kashmir, Sardar Muhammad Ibrahim Khan from Rawalakot in Poonch, was quoted by a 1949 publication as stating that the Maharaja had unleashed a 'reign of terror on 24 August 1947 that killed 500 people. While the number of casualties cannot be confirmed, 'shoot-on-sight' orders were apparently issued to army officers on 2 September 1947.
  • Snedden also writes: "In the period between 15 August and 26 October 1947, people and J&K took three significant actions that politically and physically divided J&K and instigated the continuing dispute over the state's international status: a Muslim anti-Maharaja uprising in Poonch; significant inter-religious violence in Jammy Province; and, the creation of Azad Kashmir in the areas of Jammy Province that the pro-Pakistan Muslims 'liberated'. These three actions occurred before Hari Singh's accession to India on 26 October 1947 and before either dominion or its military forced had officially entered J&K."
  • There is also: Panayi, P.; Virdee, P. (2011). Refugees and the End of Empire: Imperial Collapse and Forced Migration in the Twentieth Century. Palgrave Macmillan UK. p. 206. ISBN 978-0-230-30570-0. These Muslim localities presented a picture of destruction by mid-September 1947. Hundreds of Gujars were massacred in the Ram Nagar locality of the city of Jammu. By mid-September 1947, Jammy city's Muslim population was halved.
There is no doubt that the violence in Jammu had already started in August 1947. Aman Kumar Goel 20:46, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
A random thread on RSN that happens to mention Lancer doesn't become policy. If you want to get Lancer declared unreliable, start a thread on it, make your case, and invite people at WT:INDIA to provide their input.
  • The first source you mentioned (Snedden, Kashmir Unwritten History) talks about "Muslims of Poonch" and "Muslims of Bagh", not "Muslims of Jammu". It is entirely irrelevant. Neither does crushing an anti-state rebellion, if that is what it was, count as a "massacre".
  • The second source (Snedden, Understanding Kashmir), talks about three events/processes that happened between 15 August and 26 October. That does not imply every one of them started on 15 August. Was "Azad Kashmir" declared on 15 August?
  • The third source is authored by Chattha, whose name you have again ignored to mention. The source is . That is a Lahore newspaper run by the Muslim Leage state president of Punjab, Mian Iftikaruddin. How does the newspaper know what had happened in Jammu? And, how does this trump the Dawn report that Snedden has covered in detail?
It is clear that you are not discussing in good faith, and are indeed wasting my time. So, I don't wish to continue this further. If you want to take this further, you can use WP:DR. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 21:50, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
By the way, Serena Hussain, the source you originally cited for the August claim, states that the "Jammu district" went from a Muslim-majority to a Muslim-minority district. The population statistics are given on the main page. Do you see "Jammu district" being "Muslim-majority"? And, she cites Chatta for this too, who is equally sloppy and inaccurate. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 21:55, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
That RSN thread was not random. It involved multiple editors and I am going to abide by it until it has been overturned. Lancer cannot be used for disputing a far more reliable publication.
"Jammu massacres" concerns Jammu division which included Poonch, Bagh at the time when massacres happened. What Snedden noted is relevant to this massacre. Snedden himself considers these locations to be part of Jammu division as per his own statement: "Muslims from Poonch Jagir, and Mirpur District both located in western Jammu".
Ilyas Chattha, the writer of Partition and Locality: Violence, Migration, and Development in Gujranwala and Sialkot, 1947-1961, Oxford University Press, 2011, is not "sloppy and inaccurate".
There would be a need of WP:DR only if there is a sensible dispute. So far, you have only relied on your own views and debunked your own claims by citing sources that exactly contradict the narrative you are building up. First it was Ian Talbot and now that is Snedden.
I am going to give you another opportunity to come up with a better explanation and prove how violence started only in October.
Remember that you haven't provided even a single source for refuting the fact that massacre already started in August 1947. Aman Kumar Goel 03:41, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

The specific claim that Serena Hussain made was:

... Muslims had gone from being a majority in the Jammu district to a minority (Chatta 2013)

But "Chatta 2013", which was actually an article he wrote for Pakistan Visions in 2009 titled "Terrible Fate..", doesn't have this claim. In fact, he presents a table showing the Muslim percentages in various districts, which tallies with our figures taken from the census records. So, she added her own WP:OR and gave an improper citation, which doesn't do her any credit.

As for Chattha, he didn't make such glaring errors. So I take back the "inaccurate" comment about him, but the "sloppiness" comment stands. He was writing this article in 2009, where he cited the Pakistan Times information. But he didn't examine the Dawn information that Snedden has cited and analysed in detail. Chattha knew the Snedden article. His own article was written as a rejoinder to it. But he ignored available evidence which had already appeared in the scholarly literature. At a minimum, he should have mentioned it and explained why he discounted it. That is sloppiness.

But all these reports are wrong. They took 100,000 East Punjab refugees who passed through Jammu in August–September, to be originating in Jammu itself. Whether that was an honest mistake or deliberate misinformation, I can't say. But it is pervasive throughout the Pakistani literature on Kashmir. In fact, Francis Mudie, the governor of West Punjab, cited it to the Commonwealth Relations Office in London. All the claims of "violence in Jammu during September" are based on this misinformation. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 22:51, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Snedden says:

The most plausible refugee figures are in a report titled 'Kashmir refugees in Pakistan' by Afzal Mirza, published in Dawn on 2 January 1951.

And Chattha completely ignores the report in his OUP-published thesis! I suppose OUP didn't send it to Snedden for peer review. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 23:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

The source you have cited from Ilays Chatta is itself saying that Kashmiri Muslims were massacred throughout "August-October 1947". He cites "there were regular reports of ‘persecutions’ and ‘mass murders of Muslims" since August 1947.
Scroll: "Snedden cites a 1948 publication from West Punjab, based on refugee testimonies, recording 90 anti-Muslim incidents in Jammu and Kashmir between August 8 and December 12, 1947, with 118,459 alleged Muslims deaths and 13,360 abductions, with all incidents related to these deaths “involving state or Dogra troops”."
There is no dispute over the dating of the violence in Jammu which indeed started from August 1947.
There is dispute only over the population figure and the total victims but I have not modified the victim figure on the infobox or lead. Aman Kumar Goel 03:12, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
I didn't cite the source. Serena Hussain, your primary source for the August claim, cited it. And, she cited a blog post version (dated 2013). 2013 is when Chattha received his PhD. So, a 2009 publication would be student research, published in some no-name journal. And, no way does a newspaper op-ed published in 2023 settle any issues in a contentious topic like this.-- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:19, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Is there any source which disputes the information? I also cited Scroll.in which is not Chattha. As such this information remains unchallenged. Aman Kumar Goel 15:53, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

References

  1. Puri, Across the Line of Control (2012), pp. 25–26.
  2. ^ Snedden, What happened to Muslims in Jammu? 2001.
  3. "Riots changed J&K politics". Kashmir Life. 3 October 2009. Retrieved 2014-10-31.
  4. Chatta, Illays (2009). "Terrible Fate: `Ethnic Cleansing' of Jammu Muslims in 1947" (PDF). Journal of Pakistan Vision. 10 (1). Universty of Panjab. Retrieved 2014-11-01.

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 March 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The starting of the article looks heavily biased and tries to shift all the blame on Hindus , when the reality is they were the first ones to get massacred several times in the history of Kashmir , and also in the events leading upto 1947 aug massacre like the Rawalpindi and noakhali genocide . Also the Hindus of today's POK are extinct . 1947 Rawalpindi massacres https://g.co/kgs/n2GEJ7x Abraca21 (talk) 19:00, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. PianoDan (talk) 19:42, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

The Tale of the massacre of 20,000–100,000 Muslims in Jammu

Kautilya3 I can see it. You reverted my edit

There's a clear misinterpretation of the source. While there may have been some killings, there is no evidence of the massacre of 100,000 Muslims in Jammu. The author refers to this alleged widespread massacre as a tale.

Direct quote of the author: “SOME WRITERS CLAIM THAT UP TO TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND MUSLIMS were killed in Jammu Province of Jammu and Kashmir soon after the partition of the Indian subcontinent in August 1947 They allege that these Muslims were... the tale of a massacre of Muslims caused a chain of events...” Stormbird (talk) 04:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Remember that the MOS:LEAD summarises the body and is not mere reproduction of what the sources say. Some sources at some point in time might have been unsure, there are plenty of other sources that exhibit definite knowledge, especially Ved Bhasin, although nobody can say for sure, how people might have been killed. You are looking an old source of Christopher Snedden, written in 2001. His later writings provide more information, and more concreteness, including the lowered estimate of 20,000-100,000, which we accept as a consensus view. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 07:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Furthermore, Stormbird, the portion of the lead you added weasel words to was about the existence of the killings, not their magnitude; I'm not aware of scholars who claim killings did not occur, and if you have sources saying so you need to present them. Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:18, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

References

  1. Christopher Snedden (2001) What happened to Muslims in Jammu? Local identity, ‘"the massacre” of 1947’ and the roots of the ‘Kashmir problem’, South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 24:2, 111-134, DOI: 10.1080/00856400108723454

How Maharaja Hari Singh can accused of mentioned crimes without any proof or reference

In this article how can you accuse Maharaja Hari Singh of the mentioned crimes without showing any references or proofs. This article is trying to tarnish his name and glory. I am requesting to remove his name from the mentioned allegations if there is no concrete evidence.Sudhakar Vankamamidi (talk) 19:40, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Categories: