Misplaced Pages

User talk:NBGPWS: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:14, 25 October 2006 editNBGPWS (talk | contribs)1,647 editsm →More truth from NBGPWS← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:19, 19 January 2015 edit undoOiyarbepsy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers26,310 edits tidy 
(72 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT ]
<!--Template:Archivebox begins-->
<div class="infobox" style="width: 315px">
<div style="text-align: center">]<br />
]
</div>
----
# ]
# <!--]-->
# <!--]-->
#
</div><!--Template:Archivebox ends-->

==I took your help box==
and put it on my home page. Thanks and I hope you dont mind.] 05:56, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

==Hey NBGPWS==
I know you must be upset by the happenings on the ACLU page. What can I say? I cant blame you? However, now is the time to let the dust settle. Further antagonism on the talk page can only lead more conflict. We further our own goals by acting in a civil and polite manner. From now on, lets try to respond to commentary and not create our own. I think this will help us in trying to improve the ACLU page. Stepping back helps us prevail in the long run. We should prove beyond all doubt that we are the responsible party in this matter. ] 03:36, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

:I will see how Scribner responds. He already refused to address the bogus 9.5 Million dollar claim, but added it back into the article. He also keeps repeatedly deleting my well sourced and documented 'religious liberties' section. He also has accused you and me of being sock puppets. I'm having a hard time AGF in light of his actions. ] 03:42, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Hey, I totally understand. I would be mad too but I came in right in the middle of your edit war. Lets be respectfull civil and kind, but lets also never give up. Eventually people will take notice and we will be able to make the article less pov. In wikipedia, how you say something is more important than what you say and as important as what you do. Let the other editors be mad at themselves. Also, imagine if I was your sockpuppet. This would be the weirdest conversation. ] 03:48, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

: I only got here a couple days ago. Scribner immediately started any 'war' that exists. He thinks he owns this article. ] 03:56, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

::I understand. Let's let it go for tonight. We can take another stab at it tomorrow. What do you think? ] 04:05, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

:::I won't edit anymore tonight unless he reverts the article. I'll won't add to the talk page except to counter any false charges either. Hopefully, he'll cool down, especially after he finds out that his paranoia about sockpuppety was unfounded. Nite! ] 04:08, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

::::That is exactly what I plan on doing. Yeah, that sockpuppet thing is pretty funny. ] 04:10, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

==Archives==
I've fixed your archiving for you, and given you the above archive box. It makes everything easier. ] 06:33, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

:Thank you, sir or maam! You're a scholar and a gentleperson! ] 06:42, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

== AGF ==

Misplaced Pages guidelines dictate that you ''']''' in dealing with other editors. Please stop being ] to your fellow editors, and assume that they are here to improve Misplaced Pages. Thank you.<!-- Template:agf3 --> --] 08:57, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

== Civility warning ==

{| class="messagebox standard-talk" style="border: 1px solid #CC9999; background-color: #FFCCCC;"
|-
|align="center"|]
|align="center" width="100%"|<big><strong>Please stop your disruptive behaviour, or you may be blocked for a longer period. We invite you to contribute constructively, but will not tolerate your continuous personal attacks. &mdash;] / 16:10, 17 October 2006 (UTC)</strong></big>
|}

<div class="notice" style="background:#ffc; border:1px solid #AAA; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto;"> ] OK, it is time for your joking to end. You are potentially offending people, both here in the Misplaced Pages community and the wider readership. What you are doing could be seen as ] and you could get ] from editing Misplaced Pages for it. '''You might not get another warning before having a block imposed''', so be careful and be serious from now on. <!-- Template:Seriously (level 4 warning) --> </div>

The above unsigned template was added by ] 03:32, 25 October 2006 (UTC) ] 22:09, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

==Tips for me==

<B> PLEASE LEAVE ALL MESSAGES IN SECTION ABOVE - THANKS</B><P>

{| style="border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px" width="100%"
|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top;color:#000000;font-size: 85%"|
{| width="100%" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#CEF2E0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #084080; text-align:left; color:#082840; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;"> Hello and ] to Misplaced Pages! Here are some recommended guidelines to help you get involved. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with anything. Best of luck and happy editing! </div>
|}
{| style="border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px" width="100%"
|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top"|
{| width="100%" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #CEF2E0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting started</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
|-
! <div style="margin: 0; background:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #cef2e0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting your info out there</div>
|-
| style="color:#000"|
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
|-
! <div style="margin: 0; background:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #cef2e0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting more Misplaced Pages rules</div>
|-
| style="color:#000"|
* ]
|-
|}
|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top"|
{| width="100%" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #CEF2E0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting help</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
|-
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #cef2e0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting along</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
|-
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #cef2e0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting technical</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
|-
|}
|}
|}

<B> PLEASE LEAVE ALL MESSAGES IN SECTION ABOVE HELP BOX - THANKS</B>

==Notice to Ruthfulbarbarity==

<B>NOTICE TO USER:</B> ] In light of our past history, I may consider any and all personal posts from you on this page an unwelcome attempt to harass and/or bait me, thus possibly constituting vandalism and spam. You may post unmodified Wiki policy . Any comments or inappropriate warning templates may be removed at my discretion.

<B>'Talk page vandalism'</B>

''Deleting the comments of other users from article Talk pages, aside from removal of internal spam, or deleting entire sections of talk pages, is generally considered vandalism. Removing personal attacks is often considered legitimate, and it is considered acceptable to archive an overly long Talk page to a separate file and then remove the text from the main Talk page. <B>The above does not apply to the user's own Talk page, where users generally are permitted to remove and archive comments at their discretion</B>...'' ] 04:42, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

==Bush as Hitler==
You have recently re-created the article ], which was deleted in accordance with Misplaced Pages's ]. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a ]. <!-- Template:Recreated --> --] 04:57, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
:Ooops too late! It's a valid topic. Check the link for dozens of citable refs. ] 04:59, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

::Please stop. If you continue to ] pages, {{#if:{{{1|}}}|as you did to ],}} you will be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:Test3 (Third level warning) --> ] ] <sup>]</sup> 05:00, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

It was unintentional. People were deleting the article without notifying me. I'll take it to the deletion board before recreating it again though! ] 05:02, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Please realize that this is an encyclopedia, not a place for you to post your personal opinions, nor those of other people. ]|] 05:05, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

::It's not my opinion! It's a valid wordwide phenomena! Check out the link please ] 05:11, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you had in mind with ] - but it is not the way things are done. --] 05:38, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Did I put in the right place in the Oct 22 deletion log? Maybe a different title would help. ] 05:41, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Since the article has been '''speedy''' deleted ] and blocked from recreation, that page serves no purpose, since there is no article for anyone to look at and discuss. Pages in that section are only for AfD deletions ] --] 05:44, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Where can I discuss the proposed/deleted article? Please visit this link and then tell me that it's not a valid phenomenon! Thanks ] 05:50, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Hey guys - read THIS:

*'''Overturn''' see how it fares at AfD, but G1 is clear that even partisan screeds aren't speediable. ~ ] 06:36, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

*:However copyright violations are, and this was almost nothing but a quote. ]|] 17:20, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Please undelete my article! Thanks ] 08:10, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

How about having an article 'people compared to hitler' as its hardly an allegation unique to Pres. Bush. ] 17:47, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

:People compared to hitler would get fast deleted for the same reason that Bush as Hitler would, unsubstantiated opinions and flaimbait. Any article for "people compared to hitler" should quite simply re-direct to hitler himself. ] 19:48, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

::I disagree. I think Hitler comparisons are notable enough for mention, but too trivial for the article on Hitler himself (I have the feeling theres some more important issues that should focus on...). It wouldn't be partisan because a large portion of the people compared to Hitler have also compared their political opponents to Hitler. Its a classic cheapshot, which should also be mentioned. ] 00:01, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

:Like you said, it is a classic cheapshot. Almost nobody who is compared to Hitler warrants the comparison, and even then, it is nothing more then unsubstantiated opinion. Now were someone a neo-nazi on a crusade against the Jews, then I might see a reason for a mention in a comparison article, but if we're going to break wiki down to covering articles of who petty insults are directed at then things are just going to get silly. ] 02:51, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

:Petty doesn't mean not notable. When Silvio Berlusconi compared a German MEP to a concentration camp guard, it was extrordinarily petty - but it was also newsworthy throughout Europe and mentioned in wikipedia (I'm actually surprised at how little coverage it got compared to something like ], but I guess thats to do with how many Americans we have here). ] 13:43, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

==DRV==
The consensus on DRV supports the actions of me and other administrators who deleted your article. Is there anything else we can assist with? I'd be more than willing to help explain further if there's still any confusion about the 'why' of it. Regards, ]</small> (]) 21:43, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

: Yes - Please suggest a neutral way of naming this important topic so it doesn't get deleted. As the link proves, it's a documented wordwide phenomenon. After more thought, I agree it shouldn't just be limited to Bush. Some on the right are fond of calling Senator Clinton "Hitlery", and some compared President Clinton to Hitler.

:

:There is a Wiki page on PETA's holocaust comparsion. This is even more important. Thanks ] 03:28, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

== ] ==

I'd strongly encourage you to take your thoughts to ] instead of edit warring; probably better for everyone involved. ] 04:41, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
:I've blocked you for 24 hours, for 3rr violations related to this dispute. Please reconsider disruptive, ] sorts of things in the future. Thanks. ] 07:25, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

OK - no problem. Please have some admins check into the deletionists schemes. I'd willingly accept a 30 day block if we could weed out these malicious POV pushers! ] 07:44, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

:That's part of why I've only blocked you for 24 hours. If you find a healthier way to seek resolution, good; if not, bad. Please try a less disruptive path. ] and ] both come to mind. ] 08:21, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

{|
|]
|In case you don't know, you've been listed on ] for over an hour. I would consider being more civil; it seems to mention on ] that although users do not own their own subpages, their user space is "theirs" for project-related purposes only, and users can thus decide against other users over what content can go in their own user space. ] 07:14, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
|}

Didn't see it till too late. Thanks though. ] 07:44, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

== 24 hour block ==

On the one hand, this is a 3RR violation, and probably a WP:POINT problem. When I suggested a more productive means of resolving the dispute -- namely, MfD -- I was ignored in favor of continued disruption. On the other hand, it's out of article space. I'm not opposed if anyone cares to review this, but for the time being I've given NBGPWS a 24 hour block for continued disruption and edit warring. Luna Santin 07:31, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

*Tbeatty and GabrielF are part of the deletionists who AfD for 'fun' and purely out of politics.

*'''Comment ''' :Comments from the deletionists:
:* '''04:22, 5 October 2006 Aaron (Talk | contribs) (noting no more AfDs)'''
;* '''04:21, 5 October 2006 Aaron (Talk | contribs) (all gone! now what will we do for fun?)'''
: What an outrageous misuse of the AfD process! Deleting articles 'for fun'. ] 05:41, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

The 911cruft page is a PUBLIC page, and I cited WP saying so.

'''in general, if you have material that you do not wish for others to edit, or that is otherwise inappropriate for Misplaced Pages, it should be placed on a personal web site.'''

They are just upset that their schemes have been made public, and deleted anything I posted to that page. Tbeatty edits my comments ALL the time. Take a look at HIS history! These POV deletionists are RUNNING rampant over Wiki, and you better get a handle on them. You can ban me for all I care. Conservative POV pushers are making this place nearly worthless to research ANYTHING related to American politics, and then they actually even go back to their far right-wing sites and BRAG about how they 'got over' on the Commies who run Misplaced Pages. ] 07:39, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

::If you want to propose far ''left''-wing articles for deletion, on that page, go ahead. Porn (or sexual positions) just aren't relevant. (Oh, and I would have given you 48 hours for 3RR, ], and ].) &mdash; ] | ] 20:23, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
:: The proper venue for discussion is ], not disrupting the page. &mdash; ] | ] 20:24, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

== Thanks Derex! ==

This is a dispute over a user page, and an extremely controversial one at that. It co-ordinates editors with a particular outlook for AFD snowballs, which I can't differentiate from vote-stacking. The whole situation is really ironic, since the usual snowball swarm has now turned into a revert swarm of someone posting an article that you'd think they'd want to AFD. Anyway's I'm not even sure 3RR applies outside of article space, much less on a subpage of user talk page. At the least, Tbeatty's call for a LONG ban is inappropriate, unless he is referring to himself, in which case I fully endorse it. This is really a matter to be settled at RFC or at the Village Pump. Derex 05:47, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

:Thanks Bud! I'm gonna give you one of those cool gold star things once my ban expires! The deletionists are SURE upset that their evil schemes are being brought to light. Good work on your behalf too! You might take a look in the Protest Warrior article archives, where they BRAG about 'getting over' on the 'Commies' who run and admin Wiki! The Cons will all be crying on Nov 8! They're so sure that they're going to lose power that they're already crying like little girls! ] 07:57, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

::Of course, I'd be glad for a change in the real world; the great majority of people would. However, I'd be just as apalled and opposed by this crowd's techniques no matter what their agenda was. In fact, I've voted to delete several of the articles they post because many really don't belong. Just goes to show that the page is completely unecessary, since clearly bad articles get the boot regardless. I suspect that GabrielF started that page in relatively good faith for his own use. However, someone (Morton I think) has advertised it to several of his political compatriots, hence the recent evolution into a conservative AFD noticeboard. Regardless, whatever policy may be, it's wrong to have these private noticeboards. And despite their claims, it was private, because notice was passed around on user talk pages instead of publicly announced. How the hell is anyone supposed to know about a user sub-page serving as a noticeboard? Their claims that it's harmless since anyone ''could'' read it are hollow because you can't read what you don't know about. I hate this sort of gamesmanship. I'd like to see a small yellow-box template at the top of every AFD listed there making notice of that. Another one for every AFD that gets votestacked. They shouldn't object, since they claim it's all aboveboard. ] 08:54, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

:::What votestacking? Telling people about an ongoing AFD is not stacking anything. ] 19:00, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

::::Oh really? Informing people of an AFD cannot stack anything? Might I direct you to what the official Misplaced Pages position actually is? ]. Users have been for mass contacts about votes before. ] 23:26, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

::::Here's an example from one chap heavily involved in the noticeboard in question. Found 50 people with conservative user boxes and and informed just those people, based on that criterion. Is that not votestacking? That's exactly why Jimbo wanted userboxes gone. Interestingly, one Morton devonshire, well-known at the page in question, attempted to delete that Votestacking of policy the day after an admin referenced his actions under it. ] 20:49, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

::::You might also take note of the arbcom response to a request for clarification on this issue "If what is happening is getting everyone upset then it is a problem. Often the dividing line is crossed when you are contacting a number of people who do not ordinarily edit the disputed article". People are upset, a dividing line has been crossed. ] 21:03, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

::::Also see "Don't attempt to sway consensus by encouraging participation in a discussion by people that you already know have a certain point of view," from same policy. Also to the remarks, "precisely" isn't really a very helpful comment, particularly when a shorter equivalent of the ''dittoed'' comment was "you're wrong". ] 21:28, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

:::::I don't recall being contacted. I get my information the same place you do. Centralyzing information is what Misplaced Pages is all about. --] 00:01, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

*(provocations from RB removed in accordance with WP) ] 02:08, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

==]==
You need to seriously tone down your personal attacks and hysteria on the ]. ] is policy, and you could be blocked if you continue. ]|] 16:38, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

:Calling my contributions 'hysteria' is perjorative and incvil (I'll let it slide this time) - but perhaps more importantly - if you had been paying attention, or read the voluminous postings above - you might have figured out I WAS blocked - for 24 hours! Cheers. ] 06:39, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

== chronicles ==

I erased your comment about relisting in the course of erasing my own (without which it makes no sense). I hope you don't mind. I decided that rather than truckle to ridiculous off-point arguments, I ought to just say what's right. I had been trying to refactor for a while but kept getting edit conflicted. Strange how if you disagree with someone, then you somehow forfeit all rights (in their minds). ] 20:05, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

:Yes that's fine. I had to figure out who did it though. It's amazing how some of the people I'm dealing with just delete or refactor other people's comments. One of 'em even crossed out all of Ben Burches comments on the Stepehnson DRV then kept reverting me when I tried to restore them, leaving MY name there to try and have people believe that *I* had crossed out Ben's comments! ] 20:11, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

::I'm dealing with the same thing right now with Zer0. I decided to amend my comments to reflect my considered views (see above). He persists on reverting. This business of editing and "re-factoring" other people's commentary is just about the most obnoxious thing I've seen here. It's one thing to elide a curse word or insult with an asterisk, but this crowd feels free to completely change things. Fascinating how the acolytes' manners mirror the prophet's. ] 22:25, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

:::*'''Zer0faults''' has abandoned that account and opened a new account {{user|NuclearUmpf}} . ] 16:22, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

::::I had NO idea that Nuclear was ZerO till just now! ] 22:47, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

::::This is the second time you've referred to N as a NeoCon, which confuses me as I'd say he's pretty plainly not a neo-conservative. I'd say that arbcom has already assessed Z's behavior, without help from N. My brief experience with Z has been entirely congruent with that assessment. As to removing remarks; it's well-established wikipedia practice that editors can cleanup their own talk pages as they see fit. ] 02:26, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

:::::Do you know him from elsewhere (online pseudonym)? I think you actually can delete warning templates; the diffs are enough to show you've been warned. Z has deleted 3 or 4 today alone. I might add that I _really_ dislike people involved in a conflict adding templates themselves. It just seems, well, prickish & more intended to bait than to inform. You ought to just say your piece in plain words if you're involved. ] 02:41, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

:*'''MY BEHAVIOR??? You want me to post some saved text from the Protest Warrior Infiltration Crew where you all trolled forums trying to disrupt them, including a BLACK NATIONALIST FORUM where white PWIC members posing as Blacks posted EXTREMELY insensitive race baiting taunts???? HUH?''' ] 03:44, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

*Or you can just read this >>> <<< ] 03:44, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

:::::RB knows me orginally from the forums of the obscure 'counter protest organization' named ], where he posted as Wrathbone. I came into contact with a group of 4 or 5 of these pro-war 'warriors' at a antiwar protest a few years ago. Their MO is to try and incite antiwar protestors, using provocations and insults, into violence, and capture it on video. (think college republican version of the Westboro Baptist Church) I joined their forum after seeing their signs, and reading their outrageous lies about 12,000 members and active chapters in every state ( RB admitted not long ago that he would likely be the ONLY protest warrior in all of NYC/ NJ at one of their smoke-and-mirror 'operations') made it my mission to expose the lies, and found other kindred souls who they pissed off to no end like Rev Tyler Sadly, the founders abondoned the dying org built on hype, possibly because they failed to turn it into a 'cash cow', closed down their forum and now the 'warriors', and their conservative supporters are bitter. ] 03:13, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

::What are you rambling on about now? ] 03:31, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

:::Why don't you use your obsession to write to flesh out Kfir's Wiki article! Maybe you can add childhood hobbies, favorite TV shows, his dog's name, favorite foods, his favorite color. Stuff you devotees think important, like his childhood reading habits! ] 03:50, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

== Blocked for one month ==

I have blocked you for one month due to your inability to remain civil as demonstrated by posts to ] and previous blocks for the same rationale and report on the personal attack intervention noticeboard.--] 04:46, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

:: Hey MONGO! Trim down that URL pal, you're munging my user page! One month....OUCH! (PA refactored) Seems that Wiki is much more concerned with faux civility than by deliberate malfeasnce by editors with a political axe to grind.] 04:55, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
:::Trimmed...cool it or your block will be indefinite.--] 04:58, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
::: by multiple admins=problem.--] 05:00, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

It would take me about 180 seconds to get a new IP address and username, if I actually CARED too. I don't. Let Wiki get overun by Conservative axe grinders who go back to their far-right wing boards and BRAG about 'getting over' on the 'Commies' who run Wiki - since that what your actions are, in essence, helping to accomplish. It doesn't hurt ME one bit, just Wiki. ] 05:09, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

== I'll continue my campaign here ==

I will be bringing Tbeatty, and another's BLP actions up for Arbcom review. They are on the BLP patrol, but many feel they apply BLP to try and exclude valid sourced criticism. They apply BLP whole classes of people, orgs and even payal! Tbeatty argued that an article which mentioned problems with Paypal fundraising violated the BLP of PayPal!!! '''VIOLATED THE BLP OF PAYPAL! LOL !''' He slapped a BIO template on the political org Protest Warrior. Some feel that these actions are done VERY knowingly, and with a plan and purpose not in accordance with Wikitruth, or whatever it's called. I thought it wise to ask Tbeatty to explain his actions first. He said he had violated WP POINT in the past, when he introduced a list of Suspicious Deaths Associated with President Bill Clinton, admittingly violating Pres Clinton's BLP rights. More documentation coming to the proper venue soon.

NBG's insult to Repubs refactored by NBG!

] 05:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

==More truth from NBGPWS==

<B>NOTICE TO USER:</B> ] In light of our past history, I may consider any and all personal posts from you on this page an unwelcome attempt to harass and/or bait me, thus possibly constituting vandalism and spam. You may post '''unmodified''' Wiki policy . Any comments or '''inappropriate''' warning templates may be removed at my discretion.

<B>'Talk page vandalism'</B>

"Deleting the comments of other users from article Talk pages, aside from removal of internal spam, or deleting entire sections of talk pages, is generally considered vandalism. Removing personal attacks is often considered legitimate, and it is considered acceptable to archive an overly long Talk page to a separate file and then remove the text from the main Talk page. <B>The above does not apply to the user's own Talk page, where users generally are permitted to remove and archive comments at their discretion</B>...] 05:16, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
:I have asked him to not post here again.--] 05:20, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
::Thank you, Now please review my charges about TBeatty's misuse of BLP to see if there was perhaps good reason for my slight lapse of civility - concerns which seem to be more important to some here than EGREGIOUS INTENTIONAL VIOLATIONS of BLP, even arguing that it should apply to Paypal!!! You will find that there was good reason for my outrage, and might trim down that ban to 24 hours, then instigate a formal investigation into Tbeatty's intentional misuse of BLP, while acting as a self-appointed member of the BLP patrol, who insists he has 'special powers' as such !!! I thank you in advance for your cooperation! (Did you name yourself after that guy who farts all the time in Blazing Saddles?) ] 05:30, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
:::I'll look over the links you have posted. MONGO is a joke handle based on the character from the movie Blazing Saddles...I don't recall the farting bit as I think that was just a random group of cowboys with too many legumes for dinner. For the record, Misplaced Pages doesn't have to mention every tabloidish information just for the sake of mentioning it. But I will examine all links and if I see evidence of violations of ], I will address it.--] 05:37, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks - I'll post the links here. Nothing enflames me more than editors misusing WP to grind their political axes. ] 05:41, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Deleted tbeatty's comments as an attempt to bait me further. Please ask him not to post here too, Mongo. Thanks ] 05:52, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
:I have instructed him to not post his comments here again. If you are planning to file an ] ofr a case with arbcom, I will unblock you, so long as those pages and your own userspace are the only ones you will promise to edit on.--] 05:59, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

::Thanks, but I don't have that much self control, and would probably get axed for good! LOL ! ] 06:03, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

# incident one - Tbeatty, a self-appointed BLP patrol member who presumably must know BLP, argues that BLP should apply to unnamed 'conservative bloggers' on an unnamed site, and that BLP should apply to PayPal! (I even have better documentation of that coming)

::"I asked earlier, I'll ask again: how is it possible for this article to violate WP:BLP when it's not a biography of a living person? VoiceOfReason 03:05, 24 October 2006 (UTC)"
:::"The good people who were defamed at PayPal and the conservative bloggers accused of contributing to Andy's death are, indeed, living people. --Tbeatty 05:58, 24 October 2006 (UTC)"

:::

:::'''NOTE TO DEREX - THIS HAPPENED ON OCT 24, 2006, NOT MONTHS AGO''' ] 07:32, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

::::I'm not agreeing with what he did there. However, I'm much more concerned about _adding_ violations than a probable misuse of policy to remove something. The former makes me outraged, the latter just indignant. .... Keep in mind don't let yourself be baited. I did a few days ago, very stressed, and got myself blocked for the first time. Really annoyed me that I gave my antagonist the satisfaction. ] 09:17, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

::::::Yeah, well I took that malicious act REAL personally cause I 'knew' Andy Stephenson (albeit only via email exchanges) so the Wiki RepubliCon Cabal who deleted his entry SOLELY because it reflected VERY badly on the (mostly) Conservatives bloggers, Freepers and Scamdy Posters who HOUNDED Andy Stephenson, even on his DEATH BED, and even SENT Conservative MOLES posing as 'investigators' INTO the HOSPITAL, now want to ERASE ALL EVIDENCE of their EVIL, possibly LIFE shortening MISDEEDS from Misplaced Pages. They won't like the new 'Hunting of Andy Stephenson' piece due to be released (by people who can document every exclamation mark and comma) soon. Not one bit! It NAMES NAMES, and websites too! FREEPER SCUM DEATH MERCHANTS ! ] 10:08, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

:::This was EGREGIOUS INTENTIONAL VIOLATION of WP for outright political axegrinding, using a BOGUS BLP defense by a self-appointed BLP 'expert' ! ] 06:17, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
::::That entire DRV is a mess...and I try (ususally) to stay out of messes. What I will do is request that a neutral admin take over examining your links by posting at AN/I.--] 06:29, 25October 2006 (UTC)

:::::Thank you, I'm sorry that I'm a hot-head at times, but truth and justice are more important to me than faux civility with people whose unconsionable actions I abhor! I've been called part of the 'angry left'. There might be just a smidgen of truth to that ! LOL ! ] 06:37, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

::::::Thanks for posting to the ANI Mongo. Note to any other admin visiting that I have MANY more documented cases of Tbeatty violating BLP, including him slapping a BIO template on the political organization ] and claiming that BLP applied to the whole organization (which he supports) but it will take me 12 - 24 hours to compile them all. ] 06:56, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:19, 19 January 2015

Redirect to: