Misplaced Pages

User:Dolphin51/Sandbox: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User:Dolphin51 Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:53, 30 April 2018 editDolphin51 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers31,482 edits Amendment of WP:RD/G as discussed on Ref desk Talk page. Based on suggestion from Mark Worthen.← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:10, 2 September 2024 edit undoDolphin51 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers31,482 edits Lifting-line theory: The wing is untwisted and the planform is not elliptical so the downwash is not uniform. 
(835 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{u|J Doug McLean}} {{u|Crowsnest}} {{u|Mr swordfish}} {{u|Ahunt}} {{u|Cagliost}} {{u|Ariadacapo}} {{u|Deeday-UK}} {{u|Steelpillow}} {{u|Eric Kvaalen}} {{u|Completeaerogeek}}
The Misplaced Pages reference desk attempts to provide services comparable to those of a ]. Questions posed by users are answered by other Wikipedians, also called "respondents". The aim of the following guidelines is to clarify what are considered appropriate responses.


More than a year ago I volunteered to do a substantial re-write of our article on ]. Progress has been slow but I have now reached the stage where it will be beneficial if some Users knowledgeable about the subject, such as yourselves, take a look at what I have done, make comments and possibly offer suggestions. My draft re-write is available below. The draft is not yet mature enough for me to announce it at Talk:Downwash and invite the whole world to peruse it.
We expect responses that not only answer the question, but are also ''factually correct'', and to refrain from responding with answers that are based on guesswork. Ideally, answers should refer (link) to relevant Misplaced Pages articles, or otherwise cite ]. As always, any responses should be ] and avoid anything that could even remotely be considered a ] or ]. Many questioners will be newcomers, and the reference desk should be a friendly and welcoming place.


You will notice that my in-line citations are not simply citations. For my benefit, and yours, I have inserted quotations of the actual passage from the cited source. Naturally the final version of the article will present citations in the required format.
No question should be answered with professional advice on medical or legal matters, or advice that might be construed as medical advice or legal advice. In the case of a seriously inappropriate question, the Reference desk community might agree to remove the question in accordance with ]. Removal of a question from a Reference desk is discouraged.


Thanks in advance for taking the time to peruse my draft. Please make any comments on the Talk page. ] ''(])'' 12:22, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
==Purposes of the desk==


__________________________________________________________________
The Misplaced Pages reference desk works like a library reference desk. In a library, users consult the professional staff at the reference desk for help in finding information. We don't have professional staff, so fellow Wikipedians work to find information relevant to questions posted by others.


'''Downwash''' is a term used in ] to refer to a region within a flowfield in which the ] has a downwards component. It can also refer to the magnitude of the vertically downwards component of velocity. It is usually associated with an ] that is generating ]. Downwash is given both a common meaning and a scientific meaning, and each is used to explain one of the forces acting on the airfoil.
The reference desk process helps the growth and refinement of Misplaced Pages by identifying areas that may need improvement. If an article that ''could'' answer a question is lacking the relevant information, look for a way to work the information into the article. This provides a lasting value to the project.


In common usage ''downwash'' is used to explain the lift acting on airfoils such as the lift on the ] of a ] and the lift on the ] of a ].{{#tag:ref|''Downwash (aerodynamics).'' Air forced down by aerodynamic action below and behind the wing of an airplane or rotor of a helicopter. Aerodynamic lift is produced when air is deflected downward. The upward force on the aircraft is the same as the downward force on the air. When the mass (sic) of air in the downwash is equal to the weight (sic) of the aircraft forcing it down, the aircraft rises. ''Dictionary of Aeronautical Terms'', Crane, Dale |group=Note}}<ref name=Crane>Crane, Dale: ''Dictionary of Aeronautical Terms'', 3rd edition, page 172</ref>
== What the reference desk is not ==
*<span id="nohelpdesk" ></span>The reference desk is not for help using Misplaced Pages. Unless the answer is very simple, questioners should be referred to the ].


In scientific usage ''downwash'' is defined precisely as the vertically downwards component of velocity in a region of downwash. It is used to explain and quantify the ] on the wing of a fixed-wing aircraft.{{#tag:ref|“These wing-tip vortices downstream of the wing induce a small downward component of air velocity in the neighbourhood of the wing itself. ... this secondary movement induces a small velocity component in the downward direction at the wing. This downward component is called ''downwash'', denoted by the symbol ''w''.” (Anderson, p.231)|group=Note}}{{#tag:ref|"Hence, we see that the presence of downwash over a finite wing reduces the angle of attack that each section effectively sees, and moreover, it creates a component of drag – the induced drag D<sub>i</sub>." (Anderson, p.232)|group=Note}}<ref name=Anderson>] (1984) ''Fundamentals of Aerodynamics'', section 5.1, McGraw-Hill ISBN 0-07-001656-9<br>
*<span id="nochatroom" ></span>The reference desk is not a chatroom, nor is it a ] for promoting individual opinions. Editors should strive to accurately and ] represent significant views published by ]. An individual editor is not required to provide a fully comprehensive answer – a partial answer may be improved on by subsequent answers. However, responses must not '''intentionally''' skew answers to reflect only one side of a material dispute.
:"These wing-tip vortices downstream of the wing induce a small downward component of air velocity in the neighborhood of the wing itself. ... this secondary movement induces a small velocity component in the downward direction at the wing. This downward component is called ''downwash'', denoted by the symbol ''w''." (page 231)


:”the local relative wind is inclined below the direction of V<sub>∞</sub> by the angle α<sub>i</sub> called the ''induced'' angle of attack.” (page 231)
*<span id="nodiagnosis" ></span>The reference desk is '''not''' a place to seek professional advice on medical or legal matters. Any question that solicits a ''']''', a ''']''', or a suggested ''']''' is a request for medical advice. For further information, see ]. Any question that solicits guidance on the application of legal principles, laws, regulations, or contracts to the requestor, or to a person or entity with whom the requestor has a personal relationship, is a request for legal advice. However, general medical and legal questions ("What is sleep apnea?", "What is the role of the U.S. President in making laws?") are fine.
*<span id="nohomework" ></span>The reference desk is not a service that will ] for others. It should be made clear to questioners that we will give assistance in interpreting questions, help with ideas and concepts, and attempt to point them to resources that might help them to complete their tasks, but that in the end they should do the actual ''work'' themselves.


:"Hence, we see that the presence of downwash over a finite wing reduces the angle of attack that each section effectively sees, and moreover, it creates a component of drag – the induced drag D<sub>i</sub>." (page 232)
*<span id="noflamewars" ></span>The reference desk is not a place to debate ]. Respondents should direct questioners to relevant information and discussions, but should refrain from participating in any extended, heated debate.


:”the downwash is constant over the span for an elliptical lift distribution.” “For an elliptic lift distribution, the induced angle of attack is also constant along the span.” “both the downwash and induced angle of attack go to zero as the wing span becomes infinite” (page 245)
==Talk page guidelines==
It should be noted that the ] apply to the reference desk, both for posting questions and for responding to questions, unless these guidelines clarify that they do not apply.


:”<math>\alpha_i = \frac{C_L}{\pi AR}</math> where AR is aspect ratio.” (Equation 5.42, page 246)
==Guidelines for responding to questions==


:”the lift distribution which yields minimum induced drag is the ''elliptical lift distribution''.” (page 251)
As a respondent, you will be viewed (whether you want to be or not) by readers as a representative of the Misplaced Pages community. Many people have their first Misplaced Pages experience asking a question at the Reference Desk and it is a good opportunity for us to build goodwill with the readers which in turn can help the encyclopedia. If people have a bad first experience here, they may never come back.


:”The effect of a finite wing is to ''reduce'' the lift slope” (page 255)
Responses to posts should always attempt to answer the question and should almost always fall into one of three categories:


:”in the 3-D flow over a finite wing, the streamlines leaving the trailing edge from the top and bottom surfaces are in different directions” “Hence, a sheet of vorticity actually trails downstream from the trailing edge of a finite wing” “This sheet tends to roll up at the edges and helps to form the wing-tip vortices” (page 258)</ref><ref name=Clancy>] (1975), ''Aerodynamics'', section 5.14, Pitman ISBN 0 273 01120 0<br>
*direct answers or referrals to Misplaced Pages articles, web pages, or other sources,
:"The main consequence of these vortices is that the air in immediate vicinity of the wing, and behind it, acquires a downward velocity component. It may be measured in terms of either downwash velocity, usually denoted by ''w'', or downwash angle, denoted by ε." (page 75)</ref><ref name=Batchelor>] (1967), ''An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics'', sub-section 7.8. Cambridge University Press. ISBN:<br>
*clarifications of other answers, or
:"Thus here the 'downwash' due to the trailing sheet vortex makes the effective angle of incidence, relative to the no-lift attitude, equal to a fraction of its apparent value, over the whole wing; and the lift is a similar fraction of the value it would have if each section of the wing acted as an isolated two-dimensional aerofoil." (page 588)</ref><ref name=Abbott>] and von Doenhoff, A.E. (1949), ''Theory of Wing Sections'', Dover Publications:<br>
*requests for clarification.
:"The effect of trailing vortices corresponding to a positive lift is to induce a downward component of velocity at and behind the wing. This downward component is called the downwash." (page 9)


:"The effect of the downwash is to change the relative direction of the air stream over the section." (page 9)
Our standards on ], ], or ] should be kept in mind on the Reference Desk, as well as the rest of the project. Answering questions by referring to articles or even ] is consistent with these key content policies. Try to make sure that statements of fact in answers can be supported by an article or reference. If it is impossible to answer a question without some calculation, please make this clear in your answer with a phrase such "My calculation is as follows …". Aside from calculations, however, answers should be verifiable, that is, to the extent the questioner wishes to verify that the answer is not fabricated, there should exist a reliable source (or sources) that would give the same answer.


:"The rotation of the flow also causes a corresponding rotation of the lift vector to produce a drag component in the direction of motion. This induced-drag coefficient varies as the square of the lift coefficient because the amount of rotation and the magnitude of the lift vector increase sumultaneously." (page 9)
Don't worry if you can't completely answer a question. Some questions may demand a broad range of skills and knowledge; it is still helpful to contribute from your areas of personal expertise, and your partial answer may provide useful pointers for other editors who can then expand on your initial response. Don't feel as though you need to answer every question either - if you lack the relevant knowledge, someone else may have it. It's better to not answer at all than to give incorrect or misleading information.


:"A comparatively simple solution was obtained by ] for an elliptical lift distribution. In this case the downwash is constant between the wing tips, and the induced drag is less than that for any other type of lift distribution." (page 9)</ref><ref name=Irving>] (1966), ''An Introduction to the Longitudinal Static Stability of Low-Speed Aircraft'', Pergamon Press. ISBN:<br>
Personal opinions in answers should be limited to what is absolutely necessary, and avoided entirely when it gets in the way of factual answers. In particular, when a question asks about a controversial topic, we should attempt to provide purely factual answers. This helps prevent the thread from becoming a debate.
:"The downwash at the wing also reduces the local incidence and hence the local lift coefficients. The simplest case relates to an untwisted wing having an elliptical spanwise lift distribution. The downwash and local lift coefficient are both constant across the span (and hence the planform is also elliptical). The downwash <math>\epsilon_w</math> is then
::<math>\epsilon_w = \frac{C_L}{\pi \lambda}</math> where <math>\lambda</math> is ]
:and the aerodynamic incidence is <math>\alpha - \epsilon_w</math>, where <math>\alpha</math> is the angle between the section zero-lift line and the free stream far ahead of the the wing." (page 19)</ref>


In aeronautics the terms ''upwash'' and ''sidewash'' are also used, and have meanings similar to downwash. The vertical distribution of mass in the atmosphere does not change so any region of downwash is accompanied by an equivalent region of upwash.
=== Content and tone ===
The reference desk is not censored. No subject ''per se'' is off limits.


==Common usage==
Misplaced Pages is a broad-scope encyclopedia, so questions about topics related to politics, sexuality, bodily functions, or religion, for example, may yield responses that some people consider offensive. We understand that some responses about very controversial subjects, or ''any'' discussion of what some may consider "taboo" subjects, are more likely to offend some people than discussion of other subjects. This is unavoidable. Responses are not deemed to be inappropriate as long as they are relevant to the question. However, we take special care to treat potentially offensive subjects with sensitivity, diligence, and rigor. Further, we never set out deliberately to offend, and we endeavor to quickly remove ''needlessly'' offensive material in questions or responses.
In common usage, rising air ahead of an airfoil is called ''upwash'', and descending air behind an airfoil is called ''downwash''. The lift on an airfoil is associated with the change of speed and direction of the air as it transitions from the upwash to the downwash.<ref name=Crane/> At each point in the regions of upwash and downwash the flow speed and direction are unique. The magnitudes of this upwash and downwash, in their common usage, are not readily quantified so do not lead to determination of the magnitude of the lift on the airfoil. (In the scientific application of two-dimensional flow around an airfoil section, the lift per unit of span is readily quantified by applying the ] to the ] around the airfoil.)
]
In two-dimensional flow around an airfoil section, or around a uniform wing of infinite span, the upwards component of momentum in the upwash approaching a unit of span is equal in magnitude, but opposite in direction, to the downwards component in the downwash retreating from a unit of span. Consequently there is lift acting on the airfoil although its magnitude cannot be determined unless the magnitudes of the momenta in the upwash and downwash are assumed; the lift is directed vertically upwards and no lift-induced drag acts on the airfoil.


In the ] model of the airflow around a wing of finite span the common understanding of upwash and downwash is that both are associated primarily with the bound vortex, but superimposed on both upwash and downwash is a small downwards component due to the trailing vortices; it reduces velocities in the upwash, and increases velocities in the downwash.<ref>{{cite web |publisher=NASA Glenn Research Center|title=Shed Vortex|url=https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/beginners-guide-to-aeronautics/shed-vorticity/|access-date=March 18, 2023}}</ref> The upwards component of momentum in the upwash approaching the wing is less than the downwards component of momentum in the downwash retreating from the wing so the lift is not entirely directed upwards but is canted backwards through an angle equal to the downwash angle (or induced angle of attack); as a consequence, a small component of the lift acts as drag on the wing; this component of the lift is called lift-induced drag. This phenomenon is due entirely to the presence of flow associated with trailing vortices.
Questions usually attract more than one answer and it is always possible to discern a variation in the quality of these answers. Some answers will show a high degree of expertise and professionalism, and others won’t. If you see an answer you think is amateurish or lacking in technical rigor, simply supply a better one. It isn’t necessary to draw readers’ attention to the fact that you disapprove of one or more of the earlier answers. If one of the earlier answers is inferior to yours, readers will be able to determine that themselves. The only acceptable grounds for making adverse comment about someone else’s answer is if that answer contains advice that is likely to be harmful to readers.


==Rotorcraft==
The desk is not intended to present an overly formal atmosphere; responses may be lighthearted while still maintaining their purpose. Humor is allowed in reference desk answers, provided it is:
{{main|Disk loading#Theory}} and ]
*relevant to the question,
] is clearly visible on the surface of water below.]]
*not at the expense of other people, including the questioner, and
*not needlessly offensive.


==Scientific usage==
''Please'' don't start adding jokes just for the sake of it, and don't let humor get in the way of providing a useful answer. '''If you must make jokes''', please wait until ''after'' references have been provided.
In scientific usage downwash is a vertically downwards component of the airflow velocity vector. It is the component that can be attributed to the trailing vorticity ultimately manifested in the ] and other locations on the wing.<ref name=Anderson/>


In two-dimensional flow, and flow over a uniform wing of infinite span, there are no trailing vortices and downwash is zero.
Joking is problematic because some people (for example children and non-native English speakers) may not understand the joke, or, worse, may mistake a joke for a serious answer. ']' can make outsiders feel confused or unwelcome. ] can be especially hard to detect in a written statement.


In the ] model of the airflow around a wing the scientific understanding of downwash is that it is entirely the flow associated with the trailing vortices, and is not attributed to the bound vortex.
In particular, '''don't poke fun at a poorly written question'''. The reference desk necessarily involves communication between questioners and respondents from different backgrounds and cultures. There may be a number of reasons for 'badly written' questions – the questioner may not have enjoyed a formal education, or may suffer from learning disabilities – but they still deserve a proper answer. If you're not sure about the meaning of a question, ask for clarification; if you ''think'' you understand the question, feel free to state your assumptions and attempt an answer.


The downwash ''velocity'' in the vicinity of an untwisted wing of elliptical planform is uniform across the wingspan and its magnitude is denoted by ''w''. Alternatively the downwash may be denoted by the downwash ''angle'' ε which is also uniform across the wingspan of an untwisted wing of elliptical planform.{{#tag:ref|“the downwash is constant over the span for an elliptical lift distribution.”<br>
We should in all cases strive to ''exceed'' the minimum standard of ]. ], and don't make the mistake of confusing an editor's poor English with intentional rudeness. Remember that all Reference Desk staff are volunteers and deserve to be treated courteously.
:“For an elliptic lift distribution, the induced angle of attack is also constant along the span.”<br>
:“... both the downwash and induced angle of attack go to zero as the wing span becomes infinite” (Anderson, p.245)|group=Note}}<ref name=Clancy/> The assumption of uniform downwash across the span of a wing simplifies the task of determining the spanwise lift distribution and the lift-induced drag.


<math>tan(\epsilon) = \frac{w}{V_T} </math> where V<sub>T</sub> is the true airspeed of the wing. Angle ε is small so tan(ε) is approximately equal to ε.
=== Don't edit others' questions or answers ===
...except to fix formatting errors that interfere with readability (like a leading space or unclosed markup tags). Do not correct spelling or presumed typos, or anything that might change the meaning of the question.
If there is no title to a question, add one. You may also add to a non-descriptive title (such as "question"), but it is best to keep the original title as a portion of the new one, as it may be used by the questioner to find the question.


<math>\epsilon = \frac{C_L}{\pi \lambda}</math> where <math>\lambda</math> is ].{{#tag:ref|”<math>\alpha_i = \frac{C_L}{\pi AR}</math> where AR is aspect ratio.” (Equation 5.42. Anderson, page 246)|group=Note}}
Don't add wikilinks to a question or the title; it may unduly suggest to others that the questioner was aware of the Misplaced Pages articles. Instead, if relevant, just include these links in your response.


At the wing, and a short distance downstream of the wing trailing edge, downwash is uniform, or approximately uniform, across the span of the wing. After a short distance downstream of the trailing edge the downwash on each semi-span consolidates into a large vortex. The result is a pair of ]. Between the trailing vortices the downwash is no longer uniform across the span.{{#tag:ref|”in the 3-D flow over a finite wing, the streamlines leaving the trailing edge from the top and bottom surfaces are in different directions”<br>
=== Page protocols and layout ===
“Hence, a sheet of vorticity actually trails downstream from the trailing edge of a finite wing”<br>
“This sheet tends to roll up at the edges and helps to form the wing-tip vortices” (Anderson, p.258)|group=Note}}<ref name=Anderson/>


=== Two-dimensional flow around a circular cylinder ===
Although the Reference Desk ''project'' pages are not strictly ''talk'' pages, the same ] apply.


Possibility for a suitable diagram courtesy of University of Texas.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Fitzpatrick |first=Richard |date=2006-02-02 |title=mks units |url=https://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/301/lectures/node4.html |access-date=2024-03-04 |website=Classical Mechanics: An Introductory Course |publisher=University of Texas at Austin}}</ref>
Sometimes one question leads to another and it is a good idea to create a new heading to keep the new answers from overwhelming the original question and answers.


Richard Fitzpatrick Flow past a cylindrical obstacle.
Complex technical questions and questions of a more subjective nature may prompt substantial answers from many parties, so please remember to sign your responses (with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).
336L


Signing your replies adds a 'personal touch' and also allows questioners to follow up responses privately, for in-depth discussions or debates that may not be appropriate for the Reference Desk itself. Please leave a line space between your reply and the previous poster—it makes the page easier to read and edit.


===Induced angle of attack===
Some people go online using a ] ], so please be sparing in your use of inline images on the page (consider linking them, instead) and limit off-topic discussion. The Reference Desks are large pages, and we all need to do our part to keep them accessible to as many people as possible.
] has a wing of very low aspect ratio (1.55) so the induced angle of attack is very significant at low speeds. This necessitates a ] to allow the pilots an adequate forward view for takeoff and landing.]]
Downwash angle ε is also known as the induced angle of attack <math>\alpha _i</math>.{{#tag:ref|“For an elliptic lift distribution, the induced angle of attack is also constant along the span.”<br>
“both the downwash and induced angle of attack go to zero as the wing span becomes infinite” (Anderson, p.245)|group=Note}}<ref name=Anderson/>


The presence of downwash reduces the angle of attack on a wing. The effective angle of attack is equal to the geometric angle of attack reduced by the induced angle of attack:{{#tag:ref|"the local relative wind is inclined below the direction of V<sub>∞</sub> by the angle α<sub>i</sub> called the ''induced'' angle of attack." (Anderson, p.231)|group=Note}}<ref name=Anderson/>
=== Provide source information ===
:<math>\alpha_e = \alpha_g - \alpha_i = \alpha_g - \epsilon </math>


If a fixed-wing aircraft is to operate at an effective angle of attack of <math>\alpha_1</math>, the pilot must achieve a geometric angle of attack of <math>\alpha_1 + \alpha_i</math> in order to compensate for angle of attack lost due to downwash:<ref>Anderson, John D “... we obtain the fundamental equation of Prandtl’s lifting-line theory; it simply states that the geometric angle of attack is equal to the sum of the effective angle plus the induced angle of attack.” (page 243)</ref>
For some types of questions, answers that contain references are more useful than those which don't. For those questions, make a serious effort to locate a Misplaced Pages article or an outside ] that supports your assertions, and include a link to it in your answer. ''You'' may know that your answer is correct, but a ''reader'' has no way to judge how reliable your information is unless you specify your sources. Even if your only source is, say, your own recollections from your school days, it is very helpful to state so in the posting. If there is a Misplaced Pages article that should answer a question, but doesn't, make this clear; you don't want to send a questioner on a wild goose chase, and you do want to let other editors know that the article needs improvement.
:<math>\alpha_g = \alpha_e + \alpha_i = \alpha_e + \epsilon </math>


This is readily observed in aircraft with wings of low aspect ratio such as ]s, particularly when taking off and landing. Some of these aircraft are equipped with a ] to allow the pilots an adequate view of the ground when taking off and landing. ] has a droop nose because of the high geometric angle of attack when flying slowly during takeoff and on the approach to landing.<ref>"The high angle of attack on landing dictates the need for a moveable nose ... So the nose, which must form a streamlined shape for supersonic flying, has to droop for landing." ''Flying Concorde'' (p.47) Calvert, Brian (1981), Fontana</ref>
=== Use external links from answers as sources to improve our articles ===


===Lift-induced drag===
{{see also|Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Reference Desk Article Collaboration}}
{{Main|Lift-induced drag}}
[[Image:Induce drag downwash.png|right|thumb|400px|Induced drag is related to the downwash angle in the vicinity of the wing.
The grey vertical line labeled "L" is perpendicular to the free stream and indicates the force required to counteract the weight of the aircraft. The red vector labeled "L<sub>eff</sub>" is the actual lift on the wing; it is perpendicular to the actual airflow in the vicinity of the wing. The lift generated by the wing has been tilted rearwards through an angle equal to the downwash angle in three-dimensional flow. The component of "L<sub>eff</sub>" parallel to the free stream is the induced drag on the wing.<ref name="Clancy">] (1975) ''Aerodynamics''. Pitman Publishing Limited, London. {{ISBN|0-273-01120-0}}</ref>{{rp|Fig 5.24.}} <ref>Hurt, H. H. (1965) ''Aerodynamics for Naval Aviators'', Figure 1.30, NAVWEPS 00-80T-80</ref> <ref>Kermode, A.C. (1972). ''Mechanics of Flight'', Figure 3.29, Ninth edition. Longman Scientific & Technical, England. {{ISBN|0-582-42254-X}}</ref><ref name="McLean">{{cite conference |last=McLean |first=Doug |date=2005 |title=Wingtip Devices: What They Do and How They Do It |conference=2005 Boeing Performance and Flight Operations Engineering Conference |url=http://www.smartcockpit.com/docs/Wingtip_Devices.pdf }}</ref>{{rp|4.4|quote=While the air more than about one wingspan ahead of the wing is essentially undisturbed, the general flow pattern of Figure 3.1 reaches practically full strength at a distance of about one wingspan behind the wing and generally persists over long distances downstream. At the location of the wing itself, the flow pattern has reached roughly half of its maximum strength, and the wing is flying through air that is already moving generally downward between the wingtips. Thus the wing can be thought of as flying in a downdraft of its own making. Because of the apparent downdraft, or "downwash," the total apparent lift vector is tilted backward slightly. It is the backward component of the apparent lift that is felt as induced drag.}}]]
The presence of trailing vortices and downwash influencing the flow around a wing of finite span causes the flow to approach the wing with a reduced angle of attack.{{#tag:ref|”The effect of a finite wing is to ''reduce'' the lift slope” (Anderson, page 255)|group=Note}} The lift vector is defined to be perpendicular to the local flow direction so downwash causes the lift vector to be canted backwards by the angle <math>\epsilon</math> (or <math>\alpha_i</math>). A small component of this lift vector is directed backwards so must be included in the total drag on the wing. This component is called lift-induced drag D<sub>i</sub>.<ref name=Anderson/>


<math>D_i = L sin(\epsilon)</math> which is approximately <math>L (\epsilon)</math> if epsilon is measured in radians.
The Reference Desk is a service ''to'' the encyclopedia, and not just a service provided ''by'' the encyclopedia. If people ask questions that our articles don't address, use the answers to improve our articles—so long as the answers can be ] by a ].


<math>\epsilon = \frac{C_L}{\pi \lambda}</math> where <math>\lambda</math> is aspect ratio.
=== Reference requests and factual disputes ===


*For an untwisted wing of elliptical planform:<ref name=Irving/>
While we should keep the Misplaced Pages ] policy in mind while answering, and referenced answers are strongly preferred, it is not always efficient or useful to apply the policy strictly. If you believe a response ''should'' provide a reference, but does not, feel free to politely ask for one. If somebody requests a reference for one of your own responses, please try to provide one or indicate that you cannot. If you believe your own earlier answer is wrong, you may strike it out or add a clarification. If you think somebody else's answer is wrong, add a comment explaining why you think so, and provide evidence, if possible. Make a serious effort to locate supporting sources, as you would in an original answer. Do not delete an incorrect answer, solely because it is wrong, even if you can prove that it is. Instead provide the evidence and let the readers decide.


:<math>D_i = \tfrac{1}{2} \rho V^2 S C_L \left (\frac{C_L}{\pi \lambda} \right)</math>
=== Do not offer answers on topics on which you are not qualified ===


:For such a wing the coefficient of induced drag <math>C_{D,i}</math> is therefore <math>\frac{(C_L)^2}{\pi \lambda} </math>
If you are unfamiliar with a topic, it's recommended to stay out of the discussion, unless you are posting directly factual information such as link to a ] confirming details previously posted by others. Opinions should generally be avoided unless justified in response to sourced material, or quoted (with appropriate citation) from them.


*For a wing that does not have an elliptical planform:
The reference desk does not provide answers where an opinion from a qualified professional is needed, such as advice of a medical or legal nature, and the response to such questions should be to refer the OP to the appropriate professionals in all cases.


:<math>C_{D,i} = \frac{(C_L)^2}{\pi e \lambda} </math> where <math>e</math> is the ].<ref>Anderson, John D. (1984) ''Fundamentals of Aerodynamics'', p.251, McGraw-Hill ISBN 0-07-001656-9</ref>
== When moving a posting ==
Occasionally material will end up on a particular Reference Desk that is better suited to another Reference Desk, the ], the Reference Desk ], or any of a number of different ] pages or article talk pages. Any user can move this content to the appropriate page, but please only do so in a manner that is easy for everyone to follow.


In two-dimensional flow, and flow over a uniform wing of infinite span, there are no trailing vortices and no downwash so lift-induced drag is also zero.
When moving content from a Reference Desk page, please do not remove the section header, and please do add a signed note describing the move and linking to the new location, such as: <blockquote><nowiki><small>Question moved to "]" on the Computing desk. -- ~~~~ </small></nowiki></blockquote> At the new location of the content, please note and link to the original source of the material with a signed comment, such as: <blockquote><nowiki><small>Question moved from "]" on the Miscellaneous desk. -- ~~~~ </small></nowiki></blockquote>


==Horseshoe vortex==
The moved material should generally be placed in a new section and treated as a new submission (e.g. placed in the location for new submissions&mdash;the bottom of the page on a Reference Desk page or talk page). Standard ] also apply: a move should never change the meaning or content of others' postings.
{{Main|Horseshoe vortex}}
===Two-dimensional flow===
In two-dimensional flow at velocity <math>V_\infty</math> around a stationary airfoil (or a uniform wing of infinite span) the velocity <math>V</math> at any point is the vector sum:
:<math>V=V_\infty + V_{vortex} </math> where <math>V_\infty</math> is the velocity of the free stream, and <math>V_{vortex}</math> is the velocity associated with the ] <math>\Gamma</math> induced by the bound vortex.


In the flowfield upstream of the airfoil the flow velocity has an upward component. In the common usage, this region of flow is called upwash.
Particularly for less-experienced Misplaced Pages editors and posters, it can also be helpful to place a polite notification of the move on the original poster's talk page, with a link to their question's new location.


In the flowfield downstream of the airfoil the flow velocity has a downward component. In the common usage, this region of flow is called downwash.
If you have any concerns regarding a move or aren't sure of the appropriate destination, please discuss the action on the ] first (to avoid unnecessary shuffling of content).


In two-dimensional flow (and flow around a uniform wing of infinite span) there is no trailing vortex. In scientific usage there is neither upwash nor downwash. There is no ].
== When removing or redacting a posting ==
When removing or redacting someone else's posting, the usual ] apply. In particular, ''never'' edit someone's words to change their meaning. Editing others' comments is sometimes allowed, as discussed in these and the present guidelines, but you should exercise caution in doing so. In all cases, use common sense rather than some literally minded interpretation of the guidelines. Removing postings unwisely is bound to result in hurt feelings and acrimonious debate.


===Three-dimensional flow about a wing of finite span===
When removing a posting, ''also'' remove any posted reactions, unless they are appropriate and can stand on their own, not needing the other removed material for context.
In the ] model of a stationary wing immersed in a flowfield moving at a velocity <math>V_\infty</math> measured at the remote free stream, the velocity <math>V</math> at any point in the flowfield is the vector sum:
:<math>V=V_\infty + V_{vortex} + V_{trailing}</math> where <math>V_{vortex}</math> is the velocity associated with the bound vortex, and <math>V_{trailing}</math> is the velocity associated with the trailing vortices.


====Upstream of the wing====
In general, you should leave a note on the Reference desk talk page explaining your edit and the reason behind it. When removing a questioner's e-mail address, there is no need to sign the removal note; just replace the address by a text such as:
At each point in the flowfield upstream of the wing the velocity has an upwards vertical component <math>V_{upward} </math>:
:<''E-mail address removed to prevent spamming''>
<math>V_{upward} = V_{vortex} + V_{trailing} </math> where <math>V_{vortex}</math> is directed upwards, and <math>V_{trailing}</math> is directed downwards and is smaller than <math>V_{vortex}</math>.
A personal attack can be removed by replacing it by
:<nowiki>] removed.'' <nowiki>~~~~]</nowiki>
In such cases the reason should be obvious and need not be stated separately.


In the common usage, <math>V_{upward}</math> shows the region of upwash. In scientific usage, the downward component <math>V_{trailing}</math> is called downwash ''w''.
For removing a question seeking medical advice, you can make use of the boilerplate text of ] to replace the question. Here it is particularly important to also remove any reactions that can be construed as offering a diagnosis, advice on treatment, or prognosis. But please use common sense &mdash; not all questions involving medical or legal topics are seeking advice. (See also ].)


====Downstream of the wing====
When you remove a posting, it is recommended to note this on the ]. Include a ] of your edit. For example:
At each point in the flowfield downstream of the wing the velocity has a downward vertical component <math>V_{downward}</math>:
:== Medical question removed==
:<math>V_{downward} = V_{vortex} + V_{trailing} </math> where <math>V_{vortex}</math> and <math>V_{trailing}</math> are both directed downwards.
:I have a question seeking a medical diagnosis. <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>".


In the common usage, <math>V_{downward}</math> shows the region of downwash. In scientific usage, the downward component <math>V_{trailing}</math> is called downwash ''w''.
Please do not restore a question that was removed by another editor acting in good faith using a reasonable interpretation of the Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines, just because you disagree with the reasoning, and also do not discuss this on the Reference desk pages themselves. Instead, discuss the issue on the Reference desk talk page, so that, hopefully, consensus may be reached.


[[Image:Airfoil Kutta condition.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Upper figure: Zero-circulation flow pattern around an airfoil.<br>
Any user who collapses, closes or "hats" any part of thread should sign their closing action and include a short reason.
Lower figure: Flow pattern with circulation consistent with the Kutta condition, in which both the upper and lower flows leave the trailing edge smoothly.]]
The velocity vectors adjacent to every point on the trailing edge are always parallel to the wing surface near the trailing edge so the flow leaves the trailing edge smoothly as explained by the ].

In three-dimensional flow around a wing of finite span there is significant trailing ] and at least one pair of trailing vortices. Lift-induced drag is associated with the trailing vortices and the downwash ''w''.

'''When a wing is generating lift it is constantly operating in the downwash ''w'' induced by its own trailing vortices.'''<ref name=Clancy/> This causes the lift vector to be canted backwards through an angle equal to the downwash angle ε measured at the ]. Consequently the lift vector has a small component directed backwards so it functions as part of the total drag. This component of the lift vector is called the lift-induced drag.

==Lifting-line theory==
{{Main|Lifting-line theory}}
The horseshoe vortex model of the vortex system around a wing as it generates lift attributes the downwash to one or more pairs of trailing vortices. Prandtl’s lifting-line theory is more complex than the horseshoe model and attributes the downwash to a continuous distribution of trailing vorticity embedded in a vortex sheet trailing downstream of the wing.<ref name=Anderson2>Anderson, John D. (1984) ''Fundamentals of Aerodynamics'', section 5.3, McGraw-Hill ISBN 0-07-001656-9</ref>

Lifting-line theory shows that the minimum induced drag on a wing occurs when the downwash is a uniform value, ''w'', across the span of the wing. If this occurs the downwash angle is also a uniform value, ε, across the span of the wing. Uniform downwash across the span causes the spanwise lift distribution to be elliptical.{{#tag:ref|”the lift distribution which yields minimum induced drag is the ''elliptical lift distribution''.” (Anderson, page 251)|group=Note}} Lifting-line theory shows that uniform downwash and elliptical lift distribution can be achieved by an untwisted wing only if the wing has an elliptical ].<ref name=Anderson/>

]
A short distance downstream of the trailing edge the vortex sheet consolidates into a pair of ]. The pressure in the core of each trailing vortex can be low enough that the relative humidity reaches 100% and condensation occurs, rendering the core of the vortex ].

==Notes==
{{reflist|group=Note}}

==References==
{{reflist}}

Latest revision as of 23:10, 2 September 2024

J Doug McLean Crowsnest Mr swordfish Ahunt Cagliost Ariadacapo Deeday-UK Steelpillow Eric Kvaalen Completeaerogeek

More than a year ago I volunteered to do a substantial re-write of our article on Downwash. Progress has been slow but I have now reached the stage where it will be beneficial if some Users knowledgeable about the subject, such as yourselves, take a look at what I have done, make comments and possibly offer suggestions. My draft re-write is available below. The draft is not yet mature enough for me to announce it at Talk:Downwash and invite the whole world to peruse it.

You will notice that my in-line citations are not simply citations. For my benefit, and yours, I have inserted quotations of the actual passage from the cited source. Naturally the final version of the article will present citations in the required format.

Thanks in advance for taking the time to peruse my draft. Please make any comments on the Talk page. Dolphin (t) 12:22, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

__________________________________________________________________

Downwash is a term used in aeronautics to refer to a region within a flowfield in which the velocity vector has a downwards component. It can also refer to the magnitude of the vertically downwards component of velocity. It is usually associated with an airfoil that is generating lift. Downwash is given both a common meaning and a scientific meaning, and each is used to explain one of the forces acting on the airfoil.

In common usage downwash is used to explain the lift acting on airfoils such as the lift on the wing of a fixed-wing aircraft and the lift on the rotor disk of a rotorcraft.

In scientific usage downwash is defined precisely as the vertically downwards component of velocity in a region of downwash. It is used to explain and quantify the lift-induced drag on the wing of a fixed-wing aircraft.

In aeronautics the terms upwash and sidewash are also used, and have meanings similar to downwash. The vertical distribution of mass in the atmosphere does not change so any region of downwash is accompanied by an equivalent region of upwash.

Common usage

In common usage, rising air ahead of an airfoil is called upwash, and descending air behind an airfoil is called downwash. The lift on an airfoil is associated with the change of speed and direction of the air as it transitions from the upwash to the downwash. At each point in the regions of upwash and downwash the flow speed and direction are unique. The magnitudes of this upwash and downwash, in their common usage, are not readily quantified so do not lead to determination of the magnitude of the lift on the airfoil. (In the scientific application of two-dimensional flow around an airfoil section, the lift per unit of span is readily quantified by applying the Kutta–Joukowski theorem to the circulation around the airfoil.)

In two-dimensional flow around an airfoil, the upwash angle is equal to the downwash angle

In two-dimensional flow around an airfoil section, or around a uniform wing of infinite span, the upwards component of momentum in the upwash approaching a unit of span is equal in magnitude, but opposite in direction, to the downwards component in the downwash retreating from a unit of span. Consequently there is lift acting on the airfoil although its magnitude cannot be determined unless the magnitudes of the momenta in the upwash and downwash are assumed; the lift is directed vertically upwards and no lift-induced drag acts on the airfoil.

In the horseshoe vortex model of the airflow around a wing of finite span the common understanding of upwash and downwash is that both are associated primarily with the bound vortex, but superimposed on both upwash and downwash is a small downwards component due to the trailing vortices; it reduces velocities in the upwash, and increases velocities in the downwash. The upwards component of momentum in the upwash approaching the wing is less than the downwards component of momentum in the downwash retreating from the wing so the lift is not entirely directed upwards but is canted backwards through an angle equal to the downwash angle (or induced angle of attack); as a consequence, a small component of the lift acts as drag on the wing; this component of the lift is called lift-induced drag. This phenomenon is due entirely to the presence of flow associated with trailing vortices.

Rotorcraft

Main article: Disk loading § Theory

and Momentum theory

The effect of downwash from a hovering Sikorsky Seahawk is clearly visible on the surface of water below.

Scientific usage

In scientific usage downwash is a vertically downwards component of the airflow velocity vector. It is the component that can be attributed to the trailing vorticity ultimately manifested in the vortices trailing from the wingtips and other locations on the wing.

In two-dimensional flow, and flow over a uniform wing of infinite span, there are no trailing vortices and downwash is zero.

In the horseshoe vortex model of the airflow around a wing the scientific understanding of downwash is that it is entirely the flow associated with the trailing vortices, and is not attributed to the bound vortex.

The downwash velocity in the vicinity of an untwisted wing of elliptical planform is uniform across the wingspan and its magnitude is denoted by w. Alternatively the downwash may be denoted by the downwash angle ε which is also uniform across the wingspan of an untwisted wing of elliptical planform. The assumption of uniform downwash across the span of a wing simplifies the task of determining the spanwise lift distribution and the lift-induced drag.

t a n ( ϵ ) = w V T {\displaystyle tan(\epsilon )={\frac {w}{V_{T}}}} where VT is the true airspeed of the wing. Angle ε is small so tan(ε) is approximately equal to ε.

ϵ = C L π λ {\displaystyle \epsilon ={\frac {C_{L}}{\pi \lambda }}} where λ {\displaystyle \lambda } is aspect ratio.

At the wing, and a short distance downstream of the wing trailing edge, downwash is uniform, or approximately uniform, across the span of the wing. After a short distance downstream of the trailing edge the downwash on each semi-span consolidates into a large vortex. The result is a pair of trailing vortices. Between the trailing vortices the downwash is no longer uniform across the span.

Two-dimensional flow around a circular cylinder

Possibility for a suitable diagram courtesy of University of Texas.

Richard Fitzpatrick Flow past a cylindrical obstacle. 336L

Induced angle of attack

Concorde on landing
Concorde has a wing of very low aspect ratio (1.55) so the induced angle of attack is very significant at low speeds. This necessitates a droop nose to allow the pilots an adequate forward view for takeoff and landing.

Downwash angle ε is also known as the induced angle of attack α i {\displaystyle \alpha _{i}} .

The presence of downwash reduces the angle of attack on a wing. The effective angle of attack is equal to the geometric angle of attack reduced by the induced angle of attack:

α e = α g α i = α g ϵ {\displaystyle \alpha _{e}=\alpha _{g}-\alpha _{i}=\alpha _{g}-\epsilon }

If a fixed-wing aircraft is to operate at an effective angle of attack of α 1 {\displaystyle \alpha _{1}} , the pilot must achieve a geometric angle of attack of α 1 + α i {\displaystyle \alpha _{1}+\alpha _{i}} in order to compensate for angle of attack lost due to downwash:

α g = α e + α i = α e + ϵ {\displaystyle \alpha _{g}=\alpha _{e}+\alpha _{i}=\alpha _{e}+\epsilon }

This is readily observed in aircraft with wings of low aspect ratio such as delta wings, particularly when taking off and landing. Some of these aircraft are equipped with a droop nose to allow the pilots an adequate view of the ground when taking off and landing. Concorde has a droop nose because of the high geometric angle of attack when flying slowly during takeoff and on the approach to landing.

Lift-induced drag

Main article: Lift-induced drag
Induced drag is related to the downwash angle in the vicinity of the wing. The grey vertical line labeled "L" is perpendicular to the free stream and indicates the force required to counteract the weight of the aircraft. The red vector labeled "Leff" is the actual lift on the wing; it is perpendicular to the actual airflow in the vicinity of the wing. The lift generated by the wing has been tilted rearwards through an angle equal to the downwash angle in three-dimensional flow. The component of "Leff" parallel to the free stream is the induced drag on the wing.

The presence of trailing vortices and downwash influencing the flow around a wing of finite span causes the flow to approach the wing with a reduced angle of attack. The lift vector is defined to be perpendicular to the local flow direction so downwash causes the lift vector to be canted backwards by the angle ϵ {\displaystyle \epsilon } (or α i {\displaystyle \alpha _{i}} ). A small component of this lift vector is directed backwards so must be included in the total drag on the wing. This component is called lift-induced drag Di.

D i = L s i n ( ϵ ) {\displaystyle D_{i}=Lsin(\epsilon )} which is approximately L ( ϵ ) {\displaystyle L(\epsilon )} if epsilon is measured in radians.

ϵ = C L π λ {\displaystyle \epsilon ={\frac {C_{L}}{\pi \lambda }}} where λ {\displaystyle \lambda } is aspect ratio.

  • For an untwisted wing of elliptical planform:
D i = 1 2 ρ V 2 S C L ( C L π λ ) {\displaystyle D_{i}={\tfrac {1}{2}}\rho V^{2}SC_{L}\left({\frac {C_{L}}{\pi \lambda }}\right)}
For such a wing the coefficient of induced drag C D , i {\displaystyle C_{D,i}} is therefore ( C L ) 2 π λ {\displaystyle {\frac {(C_{L})^{2}}{\pi \lambda }}}
  • For a wing that does not have an elliptical planform:
C D , i = ( C L ) 2 π e λ {\displaystyle C_{D,i}={\frac {(C_{L})^{2}}{\pi e\lambda }}} where e {\displaystyle e} is the span efficiency factor.

In two-dimensional flow, and flow over a uniform wing of infinite span, there are no trailing vortices and no downwash so lift-induced drag is also zero.

Horseshoe vortex

Main article: Horseshoe vortex

Two-dimensional flow

In two-dimensional flow at velocity V {\displaystyle V_{\infty }} around a stationary airfoil (or a uniform wing of infinite span) the velocity V {\displaystyle V} at any point is the vector sum:

V = V + V v o r t e x {\displaystyle V=V_{\infty }+V_{vortex}} where V {\displaystyle V_{\infty }} is the velocity of the free stream, and V v o r t e x {\displaystyle V_{vortex}} is the velocity associated with the circulation Γ {\displaystyle \Gamma } induced by the bound vortex.

In the flowfield upstream of the airfoil the flow velocity has an upward component. In the common usage, this region of flow is called upwash.

In the flowfield downstream of the airfoil the flow velocity has a downward component. In the common usage, this region of flow is called downwash.

In two-dimensional flow (and flow around a uniform wing of infinite span) there is no trailing vortex. In scientific usage there is neither upwash nor downwash. There is no lift-induced drag.

Three-dimensional flow about a wing of finite span

In the horseshoe vortex model of a stationary wing immersed in a flowfield moving at a velocity V {\displaystyle V_{\infty }} measured at the remote free stream, the velocity V {\displaystyle V} at any point in the flowfield is the vector sum:

V = V + V v o r t e x + V t r a i l i n g {\displaystyle V=V_{\infty }+V_{vortex}+V_{trailing}} where V v o r t e x {\displaystyle V_{vortex}} is the velocity associated with the bound vortex, and V t r a i l i n g {\displaystyle V_{trailing}} is the velocity associated with the trailing vortices.

Upstream of the wing

At each point in the flowfield upstream of the wing the velocity has an upwards vertical component V u p w a r d {\displaystyle V_{upward}} : V u p w a r d = V v o r t e x + V t r a i l i n g {\displaystyle V_{upward}=V_{vortex}+V_{trailing}} where V v o r t e x {\displaystyle V_{vortex}} is directed upwards, and V t r a i l i n g {\displaystyle V_{trailing}} is directed downwards and is smaller than V v o r t e x {\displaystyle V_{vortex}} .

In the common usage, V u p w a r d {\displaystyle V_{upward}} shows the region of upwash. In scientific usage, the downward component V t r a i l i n g {\displaystyle V_{trailing}} is called downwash w.

Downstream of the wing

At each point in the flowfield downstream of the wing the velocity has a downward vertical component V d o w n w a r d {\displaystyle V_{downward}} :

V d o w n w a r d = V v o r t e x + V t r a i l i n g {\displaystyle V_{downward}=V_{vortex}+V_{trailing}} where V v o r t e x {\displaystyle V_{vortex}} and V t r a i l i n g {\displaystyle V_{trailing}} are both directed downwards.

In the common usage, V d o w n w a r d {\displaystyle V_{downward}} shows the region of downwash. In scientific usage, the downward component V t r a i l i n g {\displaystyle V_{trailing}} is called downwash w.

Upper figure: Zero-circulation flow pattern around an airfoil.
Lower figure: Flow pattern with circulation consistent with the Kutta condition, in which both the upper and lower flows leave the trailing edge smoothly.

The velocity vectors adjacent to every point on the trailing edge are always parallel to the wing surface near the trailing edge so the flow leaves the trailing edge smoothly as explained by the Kutta condition.

In three-dimensional flow around a wing of finite span there is significant trailing vorticity and at least one pair of trailing vortices. Lift-induced drag is associated with the trailing vortices and the downwash w.

When a wing is generating lift it is constantly operating in the downwash w induced by its own trailing vortices. This causes the lift vector to be canted backwards through an angle equal to the downwash angle ε measured at the aerodynamic center. Consequently the lift vector has a small component directed backwards so it functions as part of the total drag. This component of the lift vector is called the lift-induced drag.

Lifting-line theory

Main article: Lifting-line theory

The horseshoe vortex model of the vortex system around a wing as it generates lift attributes the downwash to one or more pairs of trailing vortices. Prandtl’s lifting-line theory is more complex than the horseshoe model and attributes the downwash to a continuous distribution of trailing vorticity embedded in a vortex sheet trailing downstream of the wing.

Lifting-line theory shows that the minimum induced drag on a wing occurs when the downwash is a uniform value, w, across the span of the wing. If this occurs the downwash angle is also a uniform value, ε, across the span of the wing. Uniform downwash across the span causes the spanwise lift distribution to be elliptical. Lifting-line theory shows that uniform downwash and elliptical lift distribution can be achieved by an untwisted wing only if the wing has an elliptical planform.

A vortex sheet consisting of the downwash from a wing rolling up into a trailing vortex

A short distance downstream of the trailing edge the vortex sheet consolidates into a pair of trailing vortices. The pressure in the core of each trailing vortex can be low enough that the relative humidity reaches 100% and condensation occurs, rendering the core of the vortex visible as a white filament.

Notes

  1. Downwash (aerodynamics). Air forced down by aerodynamic action below and behind the wing of an airplane or rotor of a helicopter. Aerodynamic lift is produced when air is deflected downward. The upward force on the aircraft is the same as the downward force on the air. When the mass (sic) of air in the downwash is equal to the weight (sic) of the aircraft forcing it down, the aircraft rises. Dictionary of Aeronautical Terms, Crane, Dale
  2. “These wing-tip vortices downstream of the wing induce a small downward component of air velocity in the neighbourhood of the wing itself. ... this secondary movement induces a small velocity component in the downward direction at the wing. This downward component is called downwash, denoted by the symbol w.” (Anderson, p.231)
  3. "Hence, we see that the presence of downwash over a finite wing reduces the angle of attack that each section effectively sees, and moreover, it creates a component of drag – the induced drag Di." (Anderson, p.232)
  4. “the downwash is constant over the span for an elliptical lift distribution.”
    “For an elliptic lift distribution, the induced angle of attack is also constant along the span.”
    “... both the downwash and induced angle of attack go to zero as the wing span becomes infinite” (Anderson, p.245)
  5. α i = C L π A R {\displaystyle \alpha _{i}={\frac {C_{L}}{\pi AR}}} where AR is aspect ratio.” (Equation 5.42. Anderson, page 246)
  6. ”in the 3-D flow over a finite wing, the streamlines leaving the trailing edge from the top and bottom surfaces are in different directions”
    “Hence, a sheet of vorticity actually trails downstream from the trailing edge of a finite wing”
    “This sheet tends to roll up at the edges and helps to form the wing-tip vortices” (Anderson, p.258)
  7. “For an elliptic lift distribution, the induced angle of attack is also constant along the span.”
    “both the downwash and induced angle of attack go to zero as the wing span becomes infinite” (Anderson, p.245)
  8. "the local relative wind is inclined below the direction of V by the angle αi called the induced angle of attack." (Anderson, p.231)
  9. ”The effect of a finite wing is to reduce the lift slope” (Anderson, page 255)
  10. ”the lift distribution which yields minimum induced drag is the elliptical lift distribution.” (Anderson, page 251)

References

  1. ^ Crane, Dale: Dictionary of Aeronautical Terms, 3rd edition, page 172
  2. ^ Anderson, John D. (1984) Fundamentals of Aerodynamics, section 5.1, McGraw-Hill ISBN 0-07-001656-9
    "These wing-tip vortices downstream of the wing induce a small downward component of air velocity in the neighborhood of the wing itself. ... this secondary movement induces a small velocity component in the downward direction at the wing. This downward component is called downwash, denoted by the symbol w." (page 231)
    ”the local relative wind is inclined below the direction of V by the angle αi called the induced angle of attack.” (page 231)
    "Hence, we see that the presence of downwash over a finite wing reduces the angle of attack that each section effectively sees, and moreover, it creates a component of drag – the induced drag Di." (page 232)
    ”the downwash is constant over the span for an elliptical lift distribution.” “For an elliptic lift distribution, the induced angle of attack is also constant along the span.” “both the downwash and induced angle of attack go to zero as the wing span becomes infinite” (page 245)
    α i = C L π A R {\displaystyle \alpha _{i}={\frac {C_{L}}{\pi AR}}} where AR is aspect ratio.” (Equation 5.42, page 246)
    ”the lift distribution which yields minimum induced drag is the elliptical lift distribution.” (page 251)
    ”The effect of a finite wing is to reduce the lift slope” (page 255)
    ”in the 3-D flow over a finite wing, the streamlines leaving the trailing edge from the top and bottom surfaces are in different directions” “Hence, a sheet of vorticity actually trails downstream from the trailing edge of a finite wing” “This sheet tends to roll up at the edges and helps to form the wing-tip vortices” (page 258)
  3. ^ Clancy, L.J. (1975), Aerodynamics, section 5.14, Pitman ISBN 0 273 01120 0
    "The main consequence of these vortices is that the air in immediate vicinity of the wing, and behind it, acquires a downward velocity component. It may be measured in terms of either downwash velocity, usually denoted by w, or downwash angle, denoted by ε." (page 75) Cite error: The named reference "Clancy" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  4. Batchelor, G.K. (1967), An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics, sub-section 7.8. Cambridge University Press. ISBN:
    "Thus here the 'downwash' due to the trailing sheet vortex makes the effective angle of incidence, relative to the no-lift attitude, equal to a fraction of its apparent value, over the whole wing; and the lift is a similar fraction of the value it would have if each section of the wing acted as an isolated two-dimensional aerofoil." (page 588)
  5. Abbott, I.H. and von Doenhoff, A.E. (1949), Theory of Wing Sections, Dover Publications:
    "The effect of trailing vortices corresponding to a positive lift is to induce a downward component of velocity at and behind the wing. This downward component is called the downwash." (page 9)
    "The effect of the downwash is to change the relative direction of the air stream over the section." (page 9)
    "The rotation of the flow also causes a corresponding rotation of the lift vector to produce a drag component in the direction of motion. This induced-drag coefficient varies as the square of the lift coefficient because the amount of rotation and the magnitude of the lift vector increase sumultaneously." (page 9)
    "A comparatively simple solution was obtained by Prandtl for an elliptical lift distribution. In this case the downwash is constant between the wing tips, and the induced drag is less than that for any other type of lift distribution." (page 9)
  6. ^ Irving, F.G. (1966), An Introduction to the Longitudinal Static Stability of Low-Speed Aircraft, Pergamon Press. ISBN:
    "The downwash at the wing also reduces the local incidence and hence the local lift coefficients. The simplest case relates to an untwisted wing having an elliptical spanwise lift distribution. The downwash and local lift coefficient are both constant across the span (and hence the planform is also elliptical). The downwash ϵ w {\displaystyle \epsilon _{w}} is then
    ϵ w = C L π λ {\displaystyle \epsilon _{w}={\frac {C_{L}}{\pi \lambda }}} where λ {\displaystyle \lambda } is aspect ratio
    and the aerodynamic incidence is α ϵ w {\displaystyle \alpha -\epsilon _{w}} , where α {\displaystyle \alpha } is the angle between the section zero-lift line and the free stream far ahead of the the wing." (page 19)
  7. "Shed Vortex". NASA Glenn Research Center. Retrieved March 18, 2023.
  8. Fitzpatrick, Richard (2006-02-02). "mks units". Classical Mechanics: An Introductory Course. University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved 2024-03-04.
  9. Anderson, John D “... we obtain the fundamental equation of Prandtl’s lifting-line theory; it simply states that the geometric angle of attack is equal to the sum of the effective angle plus the induced angle of attack.” (page 243)
  10. "The high angle of attack on landing dictates the need for a moveable nose ... So the nose, which must form a streamlined shape for supersonic flying, has to droop for landing." Flying Concorde (p.47) Calvert, Brian (1981), Fontana
  11. Hurt, H. H. (1965) Aerodynamics for Naval Aviators, Figure 1.30, NAVWEPS 00-80T-80
  12. Kermode, A.C. (1972). Mechanics of Flight, Figure 3.29, Ninth edition. Longman Scientific & Technical, England. ISBN 0-582-42254-X
  13. McLean, Doug (2005). Wingtip Devices: What They Do and How They Do It (PDF). 2005 Boeing Performance and Flight Operations Engineering Conference.
  14. Anderson, John D. (1984) Fundamentals of Aerodynamics, p.251, McGraw-Hill ISBN 0-07-001656-9
  15. Anderson, John D. (1984) Fundamentals of Aerodynamics, section 5.3, McGraw-Hill ISBN 0-07-001656-9