| Revision as of 00:38, 27 October 2006 edit195.82.106.244 (talk) →.244 continues his discrediting campaign against BK: m wikify← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 08:58, 24 July 2024 edit undoTrangaBellam (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,563 edits →SourcesTag: 2017 wikitext editor |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{WP India|class=B|importance=|auto=yes}} |
|
{{Talk header|search=yes}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=B|1= |
|
<!--Template:Archivebox begins--> |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Yoga|importance=mid}} |
|
{| class="infobox" width="180" |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject India|importance=low}} |
|
|- |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Spirituality|importance=mid}} |
|
!align="center"|] |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Hinduism|importance=mid}} |
|
] |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Women's History|importance=low}} |
|
---- |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Organizations|importance=Top}} |
|
|- |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Religion|importance=Top|NRM=yes|NRMImp=Top}} |
|
|align="center"|] |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism|class=C|importance=Mid}} |
|
|- |
|
|
|
}} |
|
|align="center"|] |
|
|
|
{{Indian English}} |
|
|- |
|
|
|
{{Connected contributor|User1=Bksimonb |U1-declared=yes}} |
|
|align="center"|] |
|
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|- |
|
|
|
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|
|align="center"|] |
|
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 150K |
|
|- |
|
|
|
|counter = 16 |
|
|align="center"|] |
|
|
|
|minthreadsleft = 5 |
|
|- |
|
|
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|align="center"|] |
|
|
|
|algo = old(30d) |
|
|} |
|
|
|
|archive = Talk:Brahma Kumaris/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
<!--Template:Archivebox ends--> |
|
<!--Template:Archivebox ends--> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Sources == |
|
==Discussion now archived== |
|
|
Previous discussion has now archived as page grew beyond guideline size, see ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
*a) Would contributors please follow WIkipedia convention and always place new discussion points at the bottom of page. Use the + sign above if in doubt. |
|
|
*b) Would new contributors please learn a little bit about Wiki formatting, signing and dating your contributions. Failure to do so makes it very hard for other to follow or to fulfil admin tasks. See, ] and especially, ]. If you are having difficulties, go find an admin to help you and have a play in the ] first. |
|
|
*c) NPA tags belong on user's pages not discussion pages. |
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you. ] 20:40, 25 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Requests for mediation== |
|
|
|
|
|
The sources have been provided time and time and your attentions have been drawn to them on many occasions. Please read over the discussion archive and check the references given on the topic page, the quotation is verbatim. |
|
|
|
|
|
Please cut any pretense at what you people are doing, you are going to attempt ignore anything that does not conform to your POV whether it is referenced or not. You are playing blind to what has been provided. |
|
|
|
|
|
'''I have put into for a "Request for Mediation" until we can resolve the issue of whether the institution's own published material and scriptures can be used as references. I argue that, of course, they can.''' |
|
|
|
|
|
See here; |
|
|
|
|
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/Brahma_Kumaris_World_Spiritual_University |
|
|
|
|
|
: Thanks. ] 20:14, 25 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
: Dear .244, Please Make sure you understand this policy: |
|
|
:http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published_and_dubious_sources_in_articles_about_themselves. It means that if you are not a BK writing this article, this policy does not apply to you. You .244; you are not a BK. Your aim is not to inform the public with researched information but rather to discredit Brahma Kumaris. One more time, please make sure you understand this clearly. As always, best wishes for you. ] 20:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:: The organizations own published material including teaching aids and scriptures are perfectly adequate sources for inclusion. |
|
|
|
|
|
:: What ever, the '''Request for Mediation''' has been put in. Please waiting until matters are resolved by third party involvement. If you persist in making yourrevesion, I will report you for 3RR. I have left warnings on your user pages. ] 20:49, 25 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::: Dear .244, the same 3RR holds true for you. So, be careful.. or I will report you. Best, ] 00:31, 26 October 2006 (UTC) avyakt7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:::: Added BK supporter and Riveros associate ] to mediation party list. Luis, if you have a user name, please sign in properly, the use of all these IPs will leave you opn to sockpupperty and I am sure that you want the world stage to see you be above and aboard all criticism. ] 00:23, 27 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Requests for mediation in the efforts to intimidate by BKWSU TEAM== |
|
|
], ET ALL Riveros, Avyakt7...etc...etc. |
|
|
I personally am feeling as though there is a concerted effort by the above member of the '''BK TECH TEAM''' under ] as on two occasions here on wikipedia page I have been '''threatened''' with having some thing written about me and told that that the attacking hadn't begun yet by ]. It would appear that anyone willing to participate on this article is '''RISKING''' being personally attacked by the organisation and their '''TEAM'''. They never provide written evidence that they do not believe these things, they stone wall, do not answer question posed to them and will debase a person. They also have done like wise to ] in an effort to intimidate, and keep members from participating here. They feel only their PR efforts should be placed here and that no information, regardless of how true it is be '''Deleted'''. |
|
|
As the most recent evidence shows, Avyak7 not only did the first sentence (which now looks like a listing of others with no content) but deleted other sections too. http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Brahma_Kumaris_World_Spiritual_University&diff=83828275&oldid=83729149 While admonishing others, as if we were small children in need of scolding, with a '''SUPERIOR TONE'''. I would also '''CAUTION''' others about having direct contact with them other than the discussion page, as they are seeking to find out who you are to intimidate and harrass. So, please don't contact them. As with any debate, do it out in the open. I for one would like to tell them here in public: '''I will not submit to anyone, by threats, intimidation, harassment or a concerted campaign.....and I do not believe you are '''DEITIES'''! Quote:''I would rather die standing than kneeling''.....With great regret/PEACE ] 18:27, 26 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:There is a similar situation going on on the PBK article:http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Adhyatmik_Ishwariya_Vishwa_Vidyalaya&diff=next&oldid=83787757 PEACE ]] 18:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== BKWSU as dangerous Sect - citation == |
|
|
|
|
|
In November 1995, the German Embassy in Moscow issued a verbal note to the Russian foreign minister listing a number of "youth sects" which "represent dangers because their hierarchial, authoritarian structure often contradicts the commonly accepted democratic values: ... and because their underlying ideology and the claims to the absolute truth of their convictions about `the path to salvation' tempt people and fully captivate those who seek changes and new landmarks .... " The following groups are mentioned in this document: Brahma Kumaris, The Family, Iskcon, Scientology, Shri Chinmoy, Transcendental Meditation, The Unification Church, and some others in Missionerskoe Obozrenie, March 1996, N3, 8. Significantly, the note was published by the Missionary Foundation of the Russian Orthodox Church. |
|
|
|
|
|
'''Citation''' : Marat Shterin, James Richardson, and Eileen Barker, "The Western Anti-Cult Movement in Russia," ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
: '''I am still waiting to establish an acceptable level of citation for two incidents that I have sufficient evidence to present here but not yet on the topic page. Given the nature of the incidents and the sources mentioned, it will be very easy for BKWSU members to qualify these. I do not see that waiting for academic references are required where public or institutional records already exist.'''; |
|
|
|
|
|
: '''Agra incident'''. we have received a newspaper report about this incident, it related to the burning of a BK sister at the center in Agra. The neighbours saw smoke coming out of the center. The police reportedly found contraceptives at the site. Apparently some incident of a sexual nature took place before she killed and burnt within the center. |
|
|
|
|
|
: '''Delhi incident'''. I am informed that a surrendered BK brother committed suicide in one of the important BK centers of Delhi situated at a prime location (Raja Garden, Mayapuri). When the center-in-charge of that center, who is a Dadi Rukmini, found that BK's dead body in the room at 4am meditiation, she locked it from outside and continued all the programmes of the Thursday class, including offering food to God, serving and eating it while a corpse was lying at the center. After most of the students had left, she is said to have informed the other BKs who were reportedly very upset, informing the physical relatives of the deceased brother which led to public scene and the center being atacked. The sister was allegedly called to Mt. Abu by Prakashmani Dadi and reprimanded. |
|
|
|
|
|
: In both case Police were involved and so public records exist. At least the former was reported in the media. My question is, what degree of citations would the BK IT Team consider suitable for general inclusion in the article and are they willing in providing an institutional response? ] 00:37, 27 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==.244 continues his discrediting campaign against BK== |
|
|
|
|
|
Dear .244, I wonder sometimes if you ever wrote a term paper? I mean, academia stuff, that sort of thing which is needed here. |
|
|
|
|
|
What you added maliciously up there is not the complete truth. You see, you need the link: Here is the link to it: |
|
|
http://www.crusadewatch.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=96&Itemid=41 |
|
|
|
|
|
Also, let me add the first part of that article by James Richardson for our avid readers to be informed about... |
|
|
(including the admins who will "soon" come after reverting the first paragraph a couple more times...you have no "reliable source" of what you write, so why it should be there while we wait?) |
|
|
|
|
|
"Russia's 1990 Law on Freedom of Religion constitutionally protected the free practice and state tolerance of religion but the law has inadvertently restricted many religious freedoms and exposed disturbing realities of Russian political processes. Provincial politicians and the Russian Orthodox Church feared the influence of new religions. Thus, outside of the major cities local laws have denied the Russian constitution and without official reprisal have banned many religious practices in these provincial regions." |
|
|
Now, you see why they call them sects, cults and all those names which you are very fond of? |
|
|
|
|
|
Can we trust you? Best, ] 00:28, 26 October 2006 (UTC) avyakt7 |
|
|
|
|
|
: As you well know, from the Brahmin point of view, based straight references to the Murlis and BKWSU publications you know I am 100% correct and it is you that are attempting to distort the truth based on ] attacks. What you are writing is entirely contrary to what you believe and Shiva Baba says. I wish you would just get over it and working on adding the positive side and that which you can from your position within the BKWSU, e.g. document the charitable giving. |
|
|
|
|
|
: '''According to the UK charity Commission, the BKWSU was set up to alleviate poverty. Can we please document how much poverty in 30 odd years? Accounts speak much more surely than academics. From my reading, it appears that they have alleviated no one else's poverty except for their own.''' |
|
|
|
|
|
: What you are demonstrating to the world is the face of a BK teacher/recruiter/BK IT team trying to cover things up and it is all being document here. Please bear in mind with your edits that the topic should also be clean and read well. Its not merely a point scoring exercise. Thanks. ] 04:52, 26 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=== No === |
|
Dear .244, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Anything published by {{tq|brahmakumaris.org}} or {{tq|Om Mandali, Pharmacy Printing Press}} or {{tq|B.K. Raja Yoga Center for the Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual University}} ought to be treated as flatly unreliable. |
|
Get over it. Would you? This is Misplaced Pages. This is not your bkinfo site. |
|
|
|
* ], again, ought to be treated as flatly unreliable. She had no academic expertise whatsoever and as far as I remember, what prompted her very-apolegetic portrayal of the movement was her husband veering away with the BKs into celibacy. |
|
Here you can collaborate as long as the information is researched by experts in the field. If you have information like that, please feel free to discuss it and post it. It doesn't matter what you think or what I think. Just your references matter. All the other documents and things that you are requesting are completely off topic. You can go to www.brahmakumaris.info and post everything you want there and ask for documents too. Misplaced Pages is not the place to voice your animosity... oh yeah.. time to revert the page... Best, ] 12:03, 26 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=== Meh === |
|
== Independent academic references could be the way forward == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Encyclopedia entries —— be it the Routledge Encyclopedia of New Religious Movements ''or'' else — ought to be sparingly used. |
|
Given the level of reaction that bkSimonb encountered from Green108, 195.82.106.244 and BrahmaKumaris.info, when he attempted to challenge the accuracy of a small section of the article, by citing a bk publication in support of his argument ]. And given that the Bkwsu have been studied in detail and at length by a number of independent academics. It would then seem obvious to me, that the study, comparison and citation of these reputable 3rd party resources is the best way to ensure mutual agreement on future development of the article. |
|
|
|
* Whaling's ''Understanding the Brahma Kumaris'' (Dunedin University Press; 2012) is a primer aimed at undergraduates. A merrily sympathetic treatment, in what is one of the two academic monographs on the subject, it is . |
|
|
* ] and Tomlinson are anthropologists by training; the latter, particularly of practiced religion. So, I have not much qualms with using ''Brahma Kumaris: Purity and the Globalization of Faith'' (Springer; 2012) but we ought not depend on it for reconstructing the curious history of Brahmakumaris (BK). |
|
|
* ]'s thesis from Monash University. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
=== Yes === |
|
Sincerely ] 20:05, 26 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Publications by John Walliss, esp. ''The Brahma Kumaris as a Reflexive Tradition: Responding to Late Modernity'' (Motilal Banarsidass; 2007). |
|
==Requests for mediation on Avyakt7 and TEAM Removing the Reference heading from Bibliograpy/References== |
|
|
|
* Prem Chowdhury's masterly ''Marriage, Sexuality and the Female 'Ascetic': Understanding a Hindu Sect'' (EPW; 1996). |
|
By placing the '''References''' heading only under his favorite items he is implying that the other are therefore not even though they include academic reports and the BKWSU's own material. I think this is poisoning the well in logic terms and very under handed. I am requesting that it be placed back and that his submission be BK '''References''' is he so chooses. Other wise you are creating a system of inequalities, '''Deity''' rules for them and sub rules for others which is unfair and not proper. No other article has such a system and I for one see this similar to racism since part of their phylosophy is to think of them selves as superior to others. I don't think this should be a wikipedia policy. So, I am going to combine them. PEACE] 21:24, 26 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
* Publications by Lawrence A. Babb. |
|
|
* Ramsay's article in ''Handbook of Hinduism in Europe''. |
|
|
] (]) 08:57, 24 July 2024 (UTC) |
