Misplaced Pages

:Copyright problems/2018 May 10: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:05, 10 May 2018 editCapitals00 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers9,265 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:08, 8 July 2018 edit undoJustlettersandnumbers (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators120,836 edits 10 May 2018: -1, relisted 
(36 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==== ] ====
* {{pagelinks|History of Balochistan}} Copyright violation started from and it was removed recently with . I am seeing thousands of words were copy pasted from books in form of "quotes" in references that are actually supposed to be short. ] (]) 05:23, 10 May 2018 (UTC) * {{pagelinks|History of Balochistan}} Copyright violation started from and it was removed recently with . I am seeing thousands of words were copy pasted from books in form of "quotes" in references that are actually supposed to be short. ] (]) 05:23, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
::Please provide a source for the apparent copyright violation, {{u|Capitals00}}. Thank you, ] (]) 09:48, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
:*Same copyrights violating editor has now restored the copyright violation and provided a misleading edit summary. Given he has been topic banned from uploading files for his copyright violations, I would urge admin to block him for his continued copyright violations. ] (]) 06:01, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Justlettersandnumbers}} For now I am only mentioning where the user claimed to have fixed the copyright problem after recognizing the warning for copyright violations. Some of the major examples of copyright violations of this diff are: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . ] (]) 11:30, 11 May 2018 (UTC)


<!--- extended argument by numerous editors moved to the article talk-page. Please do not continue your dispute here. Thank you!--->
* This is not the blatant case of copyright violations. Kautilya3 was kind enough to explain the concern in their edit summary. Urging for a straightway block is likely due to bad blood between them. <span style="border:1px solid #e2a000;padding:1px;"> ]]</span> 09:39, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
:This problem – excessively long quotations in the references – seems to have been resolved. One section blanked because of an unrelated copyvio from 2017, page relisted under today's date. ] (]) 21:08, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
:*This is a blatant case of violation of copyrights involving over thousands of words. NadirAli was '''already ''' for his copyright violations, to which he and still he restored the copyright violation. Given his history, it should result in another indefinite block, just like it happens with many others. Why NadirAli couldn't defend himself here? Looks like he told you to come here and misrepresent the entire issue for him. ] (]) 12:32, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
* {{pagelinks|Template:User Mason}} Userbox includes school logo. ] (]) 14:14, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
* Agree with Samee. Looks like a retaliatory request because of . I could not find any copyright violations. These are just quotes inside the citations. They are not any more of a copyright violation than ]. This is an article related to a content dispute between these users on ], so the frustration from there is spilling over. ] (]) 09:57, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
::Good point, {{u|Hoppyh}}! However, that particular image apparently does not reach the ], so there's no problem here. ] (]) 09:39, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
:*Making up nonsense would result in sanctions against you. You know that NadirAli has ] issues, just like you do, and they will have to be dealt with as appropriate. ] is not a copyright violation about which you have been told before and your another stale buddy (KA$HMIR) was blocked for making same false claims. It is just interesting to see how two accounts here are engaging in disruption by defending copyright violations from a multiple times indeffed blocked editor. You both have just confirmed it that the issue is serious and a block for copyright violations is warranted. ] (]) 12:32, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
{{od}} Read ], ], ] and ]. Also keep ] in mind. ] (]) 12:58, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
::Hope you are ready for ]. You can keep the wikilawyering nonsense with yourself because it is not going to turn deliberate copyright violation into non-violation. Next time don't participate in a discussion about evident violation of copyrights by a long term copyright violator. Given your own ] about copyrights, you should definitely avoid this area. ] (]) 13:05, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:08, 8 July 2018

10 May 2018

Please provide a source for the apparent copyright violation, Capitals00. Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:48, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
@Justlettersandnumbers: For now I am only mentioning this diff where the user claimed to have fixed the copyright problem after recognizing the warning for copyright violations. Some of the major examples of copyright violations of this diff are: 76 words directly copied from the book, 90 words copied from "Baluchistan was the most.... were non-Muslim", 55 words, 107 words, 65 words, 81 words, 137 words, 180 words, 98 words, 89 words from "The Government of India reached a decision in June 1942...... 3rd June plan", 64 words, 72 words, 92 words, 159 words, 154 words, 73 words from "On hearing the news Khan... state by Pakistan", 137 words from "Realizing that he must act quickly.... on their behalf", 63 words, 77 words. Capitals00 (talk) 11:30, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
This problem – excessively long quotations in the references – seems to have been resolved. One section blanked because of an unrelated copyvio from 2017, page relisted under today's date. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:08, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Good point, Hoppyh! However, that particular image apparently does not reach the Commons:Threshold of originality, so there's no problem here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:39, 11 May 2018 (UTC)