Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Krrish 2: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:20, 28 October 2006 editThunderboltz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,974 edits deletion sorting← Previous edit Latest revision as of 10:35, 7 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(13 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''Delete''' - no real argument put forward that it is anything but crystal-ballery. ]] 13:42, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|M}}
Film has not been officially announced, director has confirmed that project may be scrapped, therefore, I propose this article deleted. ] 17:53, 27 October 2006 (UTC) Film has not been officially announced, director has confirmed that project may be scrapped, therefore, I propose this article deleted. ] 17:53, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - I cant find much of an argument to keep it around. Article has almost no content and wikipedia is not a crystal ball. ] 17:57, 27 October 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' - I cant find much of an argument to keep it around. Article has almost no content and wikipedia is not a crystal ball. ] 17:57, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' If it's not out yet and not confirmed, then what's the point of an article? Wiki is an encyclopedia for facts, not speculation (unless it's some theory or other on a topic of fact).{{unsigned|165.230.141.109}} *'''Delete''' If it's not out yet and not confirmed, then what's the point of an article? Wiki is an encyclopedia for facts, not speculation (unless it's some theory or other on a topic of fact).<small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
*'''Delete''' - Per above. --] <sup>]</sup> <sup>]</sup> 18:07, 27 October 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' - Per above. --] <sup>]</sup> <sup>]</sup> 18:07, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - The ] page trivia section mentions the possibility of a followup movie. Since this is all the information currently listed on the ], I agree with the above posts. ] 18:15, 27 October 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' - The ] page trivia section mentions the possibility of a followup movie. Since this is all the information currently listed on the ], I agree with the above posts. ] 18:15, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Misplaced Pages is ] for speculation. ] 19:37, 27 October 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' Misplaced Pages is ] for speculation. ] 19:37, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - Well, I think adding notice saying that movie is not official announced yet, will be great. (the notice is already added) and moreover, Rakesh Roshan has told that he might make the movie. So, all these factors makes this article not be deleted yet. I think we should wait for some more news. ], time 15:46 (]). *'''Keep''' - Well, I think adding notice saying that movie is not official announced yet, will be great. (the notice is already added) and moreover, Rakesh Roshan has told that he might make the movie. So, all these factors makes this article not be deleted yet. I think we should wait for some more news. ], time 15:46 (]).
*'''Delete''' - Hey, Hang on! the template {{ future film }} says that "THIS ARTICLE IS ABOUT FUTURE OR EXPECTED FILMS". So, what's the matter. Krrish 2 is expected film, isn't it? :Hey, Hang on! the template <nowiki>{{ future film }}</nowiki> says that "THIS ARTICLE IS ABOUT FUTURE OR EXPECTED FILMS". So, what's the matter. Krrish 2 is expected film, isn't it?<small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
::]. The use of template could be justified if an official announcement had been made that there will be a sequel and it will be title "Krrish 2". There have been speculations about the sequel, but there have been no announcements yet, and there is no reason to believe that the sequel will be titled "Krrish 2". See the note at ]. The template and category for the films that are "not released as of yet, but are '''factually''' planned to be filmed/released in the near future". Krrish 2 doesn't satisfy this criteria. Also have a look at ] ] | ] 09:24, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
*<small>Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions.--]<sup><font color="green">]</font></sup> 14:20, 28 October 2006 (UTC)</small> *<small>Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions.--]] 14:20, 28 October 2006 (UTC)</small>
*'''Keep''' - Nobleeagle has added enough to cement notability.] ] 16:58, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. ]. If any reliable link to the the announcement of sequel and it being called "Krrish 2" is provided, I'll change my vote to keep. ] | ] 09:24, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - Rakesh has already specified that he might scrap the whole project and make a movie based on the other script he is working on if the script for the sequel to ] doesn't materialize. Until further information surfaces, why should we keep this page? The film hasn't been confirmed yet, therefore, I support its deletion --] 14:19, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 10:35, 7 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete - no real argument put forward that it is anything but crystal-ballery. Yomangani 13:42, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Krrish 2

Film has not been officially announced, director has confirmed that project may be scrapped, therefore, I propose this article deleted. Visual planet 17:53, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete - I cant find much of an argument to keep it around. Article has almost no content and wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Chris Kreider 17:57, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete If it's not out yet and not confirmed, then what's the point of an article? Wiki is an encyclopedia for facts, not speculation (unless it's some theory or other on a topic of fact).— Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.230.141.109 (talk • contribs)
  • Delete - Per above. --Kf4bdy 18:07, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - The Krrish page trivia section mentions the possibility of a followup movie. Since this is all the information currently listed on the page under debate, I agree with the above posts. -bobby 18:15, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Misplaced Pages is not for speculation. Hello32020 19:37, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Well, I think adding notice saying that movie is not official announced yet, will be great. (the notice is already added) and moreover, Rakesh Roshan has told that he might make the movie. So, all these factors makes this article not be deleted yet. I think we should wait for some more news. User:Bunty02, time 15:46 (IST).
Hey, Hang on! the template {{ future film }} says that "THIS ARTICLE IS ABOUT FUTURE OR EXPECTED FILMS". So, what's the matter. Krrish 2 is expected film, isn't it?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bunty02 (talk • contribs)
Misplaced Pages is not a crystal ball. The use of template could be justified if an official announcement had been made that there will be a sequel and it will be title "Krrish 2". There have been speculations about the sequel, but there have been no announcements yet, and there is no reason to believe that the sequel will be titled "Krrish 2". See the note at Category:Upcoming films. The template and category for the films that are "not released as of yet, but are factually planned to be filmed/released in the near future". Krrish 2 doesn't satisfy this criteria. Also have a look at Misplaced Pages:Current and future event templates#Future_events utcursch | talk 09:24, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.