| Revision as of 18:01, 28 October 2006 editBlaxthos (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers16,596 edits RfARB on conduct← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 18:54, 15 November 2024 edit undoB-bot (talk | contribs)Bots531,531 edits Notification that File:TheAuburnPlainsman.jpg is orphaned and will be deleted in seven days per WP:CSD#F5 |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{not around|3=May 2022}} |
|
{{User:AuburnPilot/Status}} |
|
|
|
{{User:AuburnPilot/wb}} |
|
|
{{/Header}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 240K |
|
|
|counter = 6 |
|
|
|minthreadsleft = 0 |
|
|
|algo = old(3d) |
|
|
|archive = User talk:AuburnPilot/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{hidden begin}} |
|
|
{{adminstats|AuburnPilot}} |
|
|
{{hidden end}} |
|
|
<!-------DO NOT EDIT TEXT ABOVE THIS LINE-------> |
|
|
{{-}} |
|
|
==Orphaned non-free image File:TheAuburnPlainsman.jpg== |
|
|
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 18:54, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
{| class="messagebox" style="background: AntiqueWhite;" |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|This talk page is '''automatically archived''' by ]. Any sections older than '''14''' days are automatically archived to ''']'''. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|}<!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-14 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-User_talk:AuburnPilot/Archive01--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE--> |
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- Do Not Change This Text --> |
|
|
{| class="messagebox standard-talk" id="talkheader" align="center" style="background-color: #FFFFFF;" |
|
|
|- |
|
|
! colspan="2" style="border-bottom:1px solid #C0C090; background-color: #F8EABA;text-align:left;" | |
|
|
:This is the ] for Misplaced Pages user, <font face="Brush Script MT" size="4">]</font>. |
|
|
|- |
|
|
| style="background-color: #FFFFFF;" | |
|
|
*If you leave a message, I'll respond on this page <i>as well as</i> your talk page. |
|
|
*''']''' using four tildes (<code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>). |
|
|
* New discussion topics go at the bottom of the page; <span class="plainlinks"></span>. |
|
|
*'''New to Misplaced Pages?''' ]! ]. |
|
|
{{#if: {{SUBJECTSPACE}}||*This is '''not''' a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.}} |
|
|
| style="background-color: #FFFFFF; width: 35%;" | |
|
|
<div style="border: 1px solid #C0C090; background-color: #F8EABA; margin-left: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-right: 3px; "> |
|
|
<center>''']'''</center> |
|
|
<span style="font-size:smaller"> |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
</span> |
|
|
|}</div> |
|
|
<!-- Do Not Edit Text Above This Line --> |
|
|
{{Signpost-subscription|right}} |
|
|
<!-- Add comments below this line, at the bottom of the page --> |
|
|
|
|
|
==re: warning message== |
|
|
sorry that was my stupid friend. it wont happen again. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 04:53, 16 October 2006 (UTC{{{3|}}})</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
:Glad to hear it. Just in case your "''stupid friend''" does it again, I've added you to my watchlist. This way your good edits will remain, and anything less will be swiftly removed. I'd hate for your reputation to be effect by other people using your name ;). Happy editing! ]] 04:59, 16 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Your opinion wanted== |
|
|
|
|
|
Someone has marked one of the articles I originated for deletion. I have greatly cleaned up the article, and wanted your opinion, for or against. The article is here: |
|
|
|
|
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/2006_Chris_Wallace_interview_of_Bill_Clinton |
|
|
|
|
|
Please place your opinions here: |
|
|
|
|
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/2006_Chris_Wallace_interview_of_Bill_Clinton |
|
|
<small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 00:05, 18 October 2006 (UTC{{{3|}}})</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
:Sure, I'll be glad to give my opinion, although as the original author, I doubt you'll like it. I think the article is definitly news worthy, but I'm not sure it's encyclopedia worthy. Will this interview be important in 20 years? I just can't see how it would. Clinton? Yes. Chris Wallace? Maybe. The interview? No, I just dont think it will. Sorry if it's not the opinion you were hoping for, but I'll head that way now. ]] 00:44, 18 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:: Thanks for your opinion. I still think the interview is a historically significant interview. Not because of the arguments which occured between Clinton & Wallace, which I view as mostly a distraction, but because it's one of the only times Clinton has gone on record w.r.t. these matters. As the article states, discussions between Presidents & V.P.' on issues such as these for the purposes of the 9/11 Commission were not under oath, private testimony. So there is not much else to go on. Not that it should change your mind (don't), just wanted you to hear it from my perspective. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
==WP:RFA/Cynical== |
|
|
{| style="border:1px solid black; background:#dfe8fe; padding:3px; color:white; background-color:black" align=center |
|
|
|] |
|
|
| Thank you for contributing to my RFA. Unfortunately it failed (final tally 26/17/3). As a result of the concerns raised in my RFA, I intend to undergo ], get involved in the ] and try to further improve the quality of my contributions to AFD and RFA. All the best. ] 14:58, 19 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|} |
|
|
*It's a shame, you'd be a great admin. I'll be sure to keep my eye out for your next attempt. ]] 02:44, 21 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== SCART == |
|
|
|
|
|
Although I believe my point made on the SCART pages to be valid, I understand fully your desire to revert the page to its previous state. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 18:56, 20 October 2006 (UTC{{{3|}}})</small> |
|
|
:While clarification is always welcome in articles, the problem was with the speculation of SCART designer's ''experience''. I hope this doesn't discourage you, but rather encourages you to make better contributions to this great project. Happy editing! ]] 18:59, 20 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
=="What a joke"== |
|
|
Please ]? You declared the RfC closed by stating that consensus had been reached on the version that you approved of. Since the RfC was originally about whether or not the information should be included, I tried to AGF and assume that this is what you meant. I believe I still have legitimate objections to the wording of the intro as it stands, and I believe that many of the other editors involved are not opposed to hashing out better wording. ] 19:02, 20 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:Sorry, but I will not be participating in that RfC. I have a very hard time ] with ], but that really is just one small part of the situation. Good luck in your RfC. ]] 19:06, 20 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::Apologies for editing your User Page, that was entirely accidental as a result of following different links at different times. As far as ], you should be able to see that I created my account well before this incident, and that I've removed some ] terms and ] terms elsewhere. A small number of edits does not mean an account must be ]. ] 19:16, 20 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Your right, and that's why it is only one small part of the situation. Again, good luck in your RfC but I have no desire to participate as I believe the issue was resolved fully in that last one. ]] 19:19, 20 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==On reverting vandalism== |
|
|
I did not disparage him. That was not vandalism. Those are all true things that *somehow* failed to get mentioned in the article. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 20:24, 20 October 2006 (UTC{{{3|}}})</small> |
|
|
:Mmm hmmm......right. I guess it was the accusations of ''lousy science fiction, making illogical arguments against people being able to have intellectual property, disparaging the Boy Scouts, and sodomy (both giving and receiving)'' that threw me off. I'll have to be more careful....right, because that wasn't vandalism....right... ]] 02:37, 21 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Thank You== |
|
|
{| align=center border=0 cellpadding=4 cellspacing=4 style="border: 1px solid #CC9; background-color: #cfc" |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|] |
|
|
|'''For offering your opinion at''' ]. '''The article was deleted.''' ''"The quality of mercy is not strain'd . . . It is enthroned in the hearts of kings, It is an attribute to God himself; And earthly power doth then show likest God's, When mercy seasons justice."'' ~ Wm. Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice, Act IV Scene 1. ] 22:42, 20 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|} |
|
|
:Nifty little boxes, aren't they? ]] 02:44, 21 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==HBF== |
|
|
Hello. I just added a table for the commercial singles releases on the page for . I wanted a second pair of eyes to make sure I got all of the tallies transferred properly, and since you were the last person to edit the page, I was hoping you might take a look and check it over. Thanks! ] 17:51, 21 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:I checked out the ] article and I think you've got it covered; I didn't see any dropped information. Looks good... ]] 18:54, 21 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== My RfA == |
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="border:1px solid black; padding:3px; border: dashed 3px" align=center |
|
|
|] |
|
|
| Hello AuburnPilot! Thank you for '''supporting''' me during my recently concluded ], which succeeded with a final tally of '''77/2/0'''. I hope I live up to the confidence you have shown. I'm still exploring the new tools, so feel free to point out of any mistakes on my part. In case you need help with anything, just ]. Thanks again!--]<sup><font color="green">]</font></sup> 08:30, 22 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
Huh, that's a little odd. Looking at the top fifty, it seemed like most of their nosource markings were valid, but their later edits started marking images with patently false db-noimage -- not sure what to make of it. They seem to have stopped for now; I see somebody gave them a {{]}}. I'll check back tomorrow and see how things look then, I guess. If they're being obviously disruptive, I think I can handle it; the finer points of image policy are far from being my best point, though. ;) ] 08:47, 23 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Aviation Museum of Kentucky == |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for creating the article ]. I shall contribute as much as I can. I frequently visit there so it should not be too hard. |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, ] 14:20, 24 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== explanation 10/24/06 == |
|
|
|
|
|
if you were telling me to explain what ypu sent with your message, i was just letting u kno how much of a bum he is. ;) <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 19:12, 24 October 2006 (UTC{{{3|}}})</small> |
|
|
:I was actually referring to the oddly incoherent statement that you left on this page referring to an elephant . I'm still unsure of what meaning it has. ]] 01:13, 25 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==A very Californian RfA thanks from ]== |
|
|
|
|
|
{| width="90%" style="border:4px solid black; background:#f2f2ff; padding:3px; cellspacing:10px;" align=center |
|
|
| <div style="border:1px solid black; background:white; padding:0px; width:150px;">]</div> |
|
|
| valign="top" |Thanks for your support in my ''']''', which succeeded with a '''final tally''' of '''(97/4/4)'''! I've never been able to accept compliments gracefully, and the heavy support from this outstanding community left me at a complete loss for words -- so, a ''very belated'' ''']''' for all of your kind words. |
|
|
|
|
|
I have done and will continue to do the utmost to serve the community in this new capacity, wherever it may take me, and to set an example others might wish to follow in. With a little luck and a lot of ''']''', this may be enough. Maybe someday the enwiki admins of the future will look back and say, "Yeah, ''']''' was an admin." Hopefully then they don't start talking about the ''explosive'' ArbComm case I got tied into and ''oh what a drama that was'', but we'll see, won't we? |
|
|
|
|
|
Surely some of you have seen me in action by now; with that in mind, I openly invite and welcome any feedback ''']''' or ''']''' -- help me become the best editor and sysop I can be. |
|
|
|
|
|
:<big>'''''Again, thank you. –]'''''</big> |
|
|
|} |
|
|
:Thanks for your trust. I won't let you down. :) ] 20:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==]== |
|
|
(copying your earlier comment): ''I was sorry to see your RfA close with ''no consensus reached''. I'll be sure to keep an eye out for your next one. You're an asset to Misplaced Pages. Keep it coming! ]] 01:44, 25 October 2006 (UTC)'' |
|
|
|
|
|
: Thank you very much for your comments, and your support! :) --] 06:58, 25 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Are you admin? == |
|
|
|
|
|
Are you an administrator? Don't erase articles that you are not familiar with. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 05:18, 26 October 2006 (UTC{{{3|}}})</small> |
|
|
:No, I am not an admin and I did not delete your page. ]] 05:24, 26 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Fox News Request for Arbitration== |
|
|
This is a notice that I have filed a request for arbitration. You are either an editor with which I am in direct dispute, or an editor who has been involved in the discussion. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 17:21, 26 October 2006 (UTC{{{3|}}})</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
:For all that is good and holy....I'm at a loss for words...I'll decide whether or not I'll participate by the end of the day today. Thanks for the notice. ]] 19:15, 26 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::Amazing, isn't it? I find it highly unlikely that the committee will agree to hear the case. However, I do encourage you to advise them of just how much bad faith is involved here. I tried to give a brief explaination, but i'm never brief! :-) You may be able to give a more concise and better phrased account of why this is absolutely unbelievable. On a side note, do you go to Auburn? I suppose I could read your user page ;-). I think about my auburn years every day of my life (fondly). /] 20:32, 26 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:::Well, if I were to make a statement, that is the general idea it would have; that I believe the entire situation is overblown and unworthy of ArbCom's attention. Now more importantly, yes I am an Auburn student. I've been down here a few years now and can't image going anywhere else. Well, until I graduate; no desire to make this ''home''. Love the town, the people, the campus, pretty much everything, but it's just too small-town-Alabama. Although if you haven't been down here in a while, it has definitly grown. <sup><font color="Blue">War</font><font color="DarkOrange"> Eagle!</font></sup> ]] 00:23, 27 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::There is some interesting disucssion going on at ]. I wouldn't join in, but you might be interested in what you read. As far as Auburn... I haven't gone back in a few years, not really regularly since the late 90's. What I miss most is not Auburn itself, but the memories I have of my friends and our experiences there. The last few times, it was like... there wasn't anything there for me anymore. Auburn University is still there, but the Auburn I knew has grown up and moved on. I think probably every alumnus from every University has that feeling, in some way or another, at some point. A lot of my friends and I are still in touch and fairly close -- if there were any point in my life I could experience again, my Auburn experience wins hands down! :-) War Eagle! /] 22:04, 27 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== George W. Bush article == |
|
|
AuburnPilot, |
|
|
|
|
|
I very much appreciate your monitering, both faithfully and without biased, the article on Bush. I enjoy reading articles on wikipedia and it is an invaluable source of information to me. Without such monitering this article would quickly be rife with personal opinions and would be worthless. Dedicated individuals who care about the topics, like you, make this encyclopedia so great. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 02:33, 27 October 2006 (UTC{{{3|}}})</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
:It is always nice to receive feedback on what I do here at Misplaced Pages, especially when it's a compliment. I very much appreciate your comments and thank you for making them. I try to be even handed in my edits, and I will of course continue to try my hardest to keep it that way. Thanks again, ]] 02:58, 27 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Thank you for supporting my RfA == |
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for supporting ] that I have passed with 73/2/1.--] 09:15, 27 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Thank you== |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for making sure I get good laugh at the end of my wiki week (considering all the nonsense we've had to deal with this week). I just saw what you reverted from the George Bush talk page, and your edit summary. Oh man, TGIF. ] 23:44, 27 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:It has definitly been one of those weeks. TGIF is right. ;) ]] 01:47, 28 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Presidential Poetry == |
|
|
|
|
|
Man you are FAST! (] 02:22, 28 October 2006 (UTC)) |
|
|
|
|
|
== RfARB on conduct == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hey AuburnPilot, |
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry that this thing won't die -- after the ArbCom rejected cbuhl's request and I asked him to let it die now, he went and slapped a WP:NPA template on my userspace and talkspace! Final straw for me -- I have called for an RfArb regarding his behavior. I listed you as a witness, and I would sincerely appreciate you relaying your experiences and thoughts to the ArbCom. Sorry this has turned into such a dismal situation. Hopefully our next interaction will be under more pleasant circumstances! Thanks! /] 18:01, 28 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
