Misplaced Pages

User talk:ScepticismOfPopularisation: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:26, 24 May 2018 editJoshua Jonathan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers107,140 edits Edit-warring: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 10:51, 21 June 2018 edit undoScepticismOfPopularisation (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users707 edits Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion 
(21 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Edit-warring == == Warned for edit warring at ] ==


You've been '''warned''' for edit warring per the result of . If you revert the article again (before getting consensus on the talk page) you are risking a block. The steps of ] are open to you. Thanks, ] (]) 02:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Blanking your talkpages is not a good sign... You're lucky that you made your reverts in a series on edits; this makes it count as only two. ] -] 07:26, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
:Perhaps isn't the best one to use when all you are doing is *erasing* the past messages from your talk, and not saving them anywhere else. When the posts removed are mostly complaints then I suppose this is understandable. There might be a way to receive fewer complaints if you would change your approach to editing Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 02:46, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

== Sahansdal ==

I deleted a post of yours on my talk page, because it is unnecessarily strident. You are welcome to repost what you have to say there in a more civil fashion if you like.] (]) 17:26, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

== Edit-warring at ] ==

] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br>
Please be particularly aware that ] states:
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''.
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew -->

*
* ,
* ]
] -] 08:15, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
:Note that your phrase "rabbi Yeshua" also constitutes ], and violates ]. See also ]. ] -] 08:38, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for June 16==

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (&nbsp;|&nbsp;).

(].) --] (]) 09:14, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

== Don't restore comments a user has removed from his/her own talk page ==

See ] for applicable guidance. Can't appreciate your edit-warring in contravention of that guidance at ]. The topic should be discussed on the article talk page, in this case ]. --] (]) 11:27, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
:Fair enough. I apologize.] (]) 11:42, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

== Please use Edit summaries ==

They are almost essential in helping other editors understand what you are doing. Have a read of ], and try to use one every time you make an edit ] (]) 02:11, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

== Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion ==
]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. The thread is ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. ] ] 10:46, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
*I came here to add a last warning. How do you think Misplaced Pages would work if everyone behaved like that? ] (]) 10:48, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
::I'm pretty sure I made it clear that I have no intentions of reverting again after that last response. But whatever.] (]) 10:51, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 10:51, 21 June 2018

Warned for edit warring at Jesus

You've been warned for edit warring per the result of a complaint about your edits at WP:AN3. If you revert the article again (before getting consensus on the talk page) you are risking a block. The steps of WP:Dispute resolution are open to you. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 02:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Perhaps the term 'archiving' isn't the best one to use when all you are doing is *erasing* the past messages from your talk, and not saving them anywhere else. When the posts removed are mostly complaints then I suppose this is understandable. There might be a way to receive fewer complaints if you would change your approach to editing Misplaced Pages. EdJohnston (talk) 02:46, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Sahansdal

I deleted a post of yours on my talk page, because it is unnecessarily strident. You are welcome to repost what you have to say there in a more civil fashion if you like.Sahansdal (talk) 17:26, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Edit-warring at Origins of Christianity

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 08:15, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Note that your phrase "rabbi Yeshua" also constitutes WP:OR, and violates WP:LEAD. See also Talk:Origins of Christianity#Rabbi Yeshua. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 08:38, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Western canon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Don't restore comments a user has removed from his/her own talk page

See Misplaced Pages:Don't restore removed comments for applicable guidance. Can't appreciate your edit-warring in contravention of that guidance at User talk:Francis Schonken. The topic should be discussed on the article talk page, in this case Talk:Classical music. --Francis Schonken (talk) 11:27, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Fair enough. I apologize.ScepticismOfPopularisation (talk) 11:42, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Please use Edit summaries

They are almost essential in helping other editors understand what you are doing. Have a read of WP:EDITSUMMARY, and try to use one every time you make an edit HiLo48 (talk) 02:11, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:ScepticismOfPopularisation reported by User:Doug Weller (Result: ). Thank you. Doug Weller talk 10:46, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure I made it clear that I have no intentions of reverting again after that last response. But whatever.ScepticismOfPopularisation (talk) 10:51, 21 June 2018 (UTC)