Revision as of 12:44, 24 May 2018 editNardog (talk | contribs)Edit filter helpers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors81,133 edits →A small request: clarify← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:58, 17 October 2019 edit undoWolfdog (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,775 edits →Another potential G-Zay sock | ||
(28 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:] | :] | ||
:] | :] | ||
:] | |||
}} | }} | ||
}} | }} | ||
== |
== Another potential G-Zay sock == | ||
{{user|Wachenroder}} sure seems like another sock account of G-Zay, and since you have expedience doing some of the prior investigation posts (I have no idea how to start one or I would have myself), I thought I'd let you know. ~ ] <sup>(])</sup> 18:38, 17 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
When you add a reply, can you keep the section link (<code>/* ... */</code>) in the edit summary? It makes it easier to track conversations in the watchlist and revision history. Thanks. ] (]) 10:49, 22 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
:You're looking for {{u|Kbb2}}. ] (]) 23:58, 17 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
So... could you do that or not? JFYI, what I usually do is press {{key press|Tab}} {{key press|Right}} <ins>when the focus is on the edit box</ins> and then enter e.g. "re", then hit Enter to publish the changes. ] (]) 10:46, 24 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
:{{replyto|Nardog}} I'll write that somewhere, thanks. I actually have no idea why I'm doing that, maybe I just want my edit summaries to be shorter. ] (]) 12:37, 24 May 2018 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 23:58, 17 October 2019
Archives |
Another potential G-Zay sock
Wachenroder (talk · contribs) sure seems like another sock account of G-Zay, and since you have expedience doing some of the prior investigation posts (I have no idea how to start one or I would have myself), I thought I'd let you know. ~ Dissident93 18:38, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- You're looking for Kbb2. Wolfdog (talk) 23:58, 17 October 2019 (UTC)