| Revision as of 16:02, 24 May 2018 editSoftlavender (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers92,261 edits Warning: Three-revert rule on Richard Wagner. (TW)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:58, 17 October 2019 edit undoWolfdog (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,931 edits →Another potential G-Zay sock | ||
| (26 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| :] | :] | ||
| :] | :] | ||
| :] | |||
| }} | }} | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == |
== Another potential G-Zay sock == | ||
| {{user|Wachenroder}} sure seems like another sock account of G-Zay, and since you have expedience doing some of the prior investigation posts (I have no idea how to start one or I would have myself), I thought I'd let you know. ~ ] <sup>(])</sup> 18:38, 17 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| When you add a reply, can you keep the section link (<code>/* ... */</code>) in the edit summary? It makes it easier to track conversations in the watchlist and revision history. Thanks. ] (]) 10:49, 22 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :You're looking for {{u|Kbb2}}. ] (]) 23:58, 17 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| So... could you do that or not? JFYI, what I usually do is press {{key press|Tab}} {{key press|Right}} <ins>when the focus is on the edit box</ins> and then enter e.g. "re", then hit Enter to publish the changes. ] (]) 10:46, 24 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :{{replyto|Nardog}} I'll write that somewhere, thanks. I actually have no idea why I'm doing that, maybe I just want my edit summaries to be shorter. ] (]) 12:37, 24 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::] ] (]) 13:06, 24 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == May 2018 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 16:02, 24 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:58, 17 October 2019
 Archives |
Another potential G-Zay sock
Wachenroder (talk · contribs) sure seems like another sock account of G-Zay, and since you have expedience doing some of the prior investigation posts (I have no idea how to start one or I would have myself), I thought I'd let you know. ~ Dissident93 18:38, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- You're looking for Kbb2. Wolfdog (talk) 23:58, 17 October 2019 (UTC)