Misplaced Pages

Global Analyst Research Settlements: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:53, 28 October 2006 editKuru (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators203,976 edits rmv random list of 'background' items; overwhelms the article and would seem to be at least partially copied from the www.creativeinvest.com site, see talk page← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:27, 7 June 2024 edit undoInternetArchiveBot (talk | contribs)Bots, Pending changes reviewers5,380,445 edits Rescuing 4 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5 
(68 intermediate revisions by 47 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|US financial regulatory enforcement in 2003}}
{{clarify}}{{wikify-date|October 2006}}
The '''Global Settlement''' was a legal ] reached between ] Chairman ], ] ], ] President Christine Bruenn, ] , ] Chairman ], and state securities regulators with the nation's top ] to resolve issues of ] at ]. According to the SEC, "The 'global settlement' concluded a joint investigation begun in April (2002) by regulators into the undue influence of investment banking interests on securities research at brokerage firms." The settlement decision was published on ], ]. The '''Global Analyst Research Settlement''' was an enforcement agreement reached in the United States on April 28, 2003, between the ] (SEC), ] (NASD), ] (NYSE), and ten of the ]'s largest ] to address issues of ] within their businesses in relation to recommendations made by ] departments of those firms.<ref name="one">{{Citation | title= Ten of Nation's Top Investment Firms Settle Enforcement Actions Involving Conflict of Interest | date= April 28, 2003 | url= https://www.sec.gov/news/press/2003-54.htm | accessdate= July 10, 2007 | archive-date= September 24, 2014 | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20140924200120/http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2003-54.htm | url-status= live }}</ref>


== Decision ==
The total fine was $1.435 billion.


The central issue at hand that had been ] in court was the conflict of interest between the ] and ] departments of ten of the largest investment firms in the United States. The investment firms involved in the settlement had all engaged in actions and practices that had allowed the inappropriate influence of their research analysts by their investment bankers seeking lucrative fees.<ref name="one"/> A typical violation addressed by the settlement was the case of ] and ], which were alleged to have engaged in inappropriate spinning of "hot" ]s (IPOs) and issued fraudulent research reports in violation of various sections within the ]. Similarly, ] and ] were alleged to have received payments for investment research without disclosing such payments in violation of the ].
==Settlement payments==


== Enforcement actions ==
{| BORDER="1"

|- VALIGN="TOP" align="center"
As part of the settlement decision published on December 20, 2002, several regulations designed to prevent the abuse stemming from pressure by ] on ] to provide "favorable" appraisals were instantiated. Namely, these firms would have to literally insulate their banking and analysis departments from each other physically and with ].<ref name="one"/> Additionally, budget allocation via management in research departments will be independent of investment departments. Research analysts will also be prohibited from going on pitches and roadshows with bankers during advertising and promotion of IPOs. Similarly, the Global Settlement also increased the IPO "]" from 25 days to 40 days.<ref>{{Citation | title = SEC factsheet on Global Analyst Research Settlement | date = April 28, 2003 | url = https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/factsheet.htm | accessdate = September 1, 2007 | archive-date = August 8, 2007 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070808055620/http://www.sec.gov/news/speech/factsheet.htm | url-status = live }}</ref> Finally, research analyst's historical ratings must be disclosed and made available.
! Name Of Firm

! Retrospective Relief<Br>($ millions)
Other than these regulatory actions, the firms involved in the settlement have been required to pay fines to their investors, to fund investor education, and to pay for independent third-party market research.<ref name="one"/> A total fine of $1.435 billion was assessed and is described in the table below.<ref>{{cite web |title=SEC, NY Attorney General, NASD, NASAA, NYSE and State Regulators Announce Historic Agreement to Reform Investment Practices |publisher=Office of New York State Attorney General |date=2002-12-20 |url=http://www.oag.state.ny.us/media_center/2002/dec/dec20b_02.html |accessdate=2008-09-05 |archive-date=2009-10-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091015102311/http://www.oag.state.ny.us/media_center/2002/dec/dec20b_02.html |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/07/22/spitzer-returns-taking-aim-again-at-financial-analysts/|title=Spitzer Returns, Taking Aim Again at Financial Analysts|access-date=2017-03-05|archive-date=2017-12-03|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171203082755/https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/07/22/spitzer-returns-taking-aim-again-at-financial-analysts/|url-status=live}}</ref>
! Independent Research<Br>($ millions)

! Investor Education<Br>($ millions)
== Payments ==
|- valign="top"

| ] & CO. LLC
{| class="wikitable"
| align="center" | 50
! Name of firm
| align="center" | 25
! Retrospective relief<br>($ millions)
| align="center" | 5
! Independent research<br>($ millions)
|- valign="top"
! Investor education<br>($ millions)
| ] Corp.
! Total<br>($ millions)
| align="center" | 150
|-
| align="center" | 50
| ]
| align="center" | 0
| 50
|- valign="top"
| 25
| 5
| 80
|-
| ]
| 150
| 50
| 0
| 200
|-
| ] | ]
| 50
| align="center" | 50
| 25
| align="center" | 25
| 5
| align="center" | 5
| 80
|- valign="top"
|-
| ] | ]
| 50
| align="center" | 50
| 50
| align="center" | 50
| 10
| align="center" | 10
| 110
|- valign="top"
|-
| ] & CO.
| ]
| align="center" | 50
| 50
| align="center" | 25
| 25
| align="center" | 5
| 5
|- valign="top"
| 80
| ], Inc.
|-
| align="center" | 50
| ]
| align="center" | 25
| 50
| align="center" | 5
| 25
|- valign="top"
| 5
| ] & CO., Inc.
| 80
| align="center" | 100'''*'''
|-
| align="center" | 75
| ]
| align="center" | 25
| 100
|- valign="top"
| 75
| 25
| 200
|-
| ] | ]
| 50
| align="center" | 50
| 75
| align="center" | 75
| 0
| align="center" | 0
| 125
|- valign="top"
|-
| ], Inc.
| ]
| align="center" | 300
| 300
| align="center" | 75
| 75
| align="center" | 25
| 25
|- valign="top"
| 400
| ] LLC
|-
| align="center" | 50
| ]
| align="center" | 25
| 50
| align="center" | 5
| 25
|- valign="top"
| 5
| '''Total:'''
| 80
| align="center" | '''900'''
|-
| align="center" | '''450'''
! Total
| align="center" | '''85'''
! 900
! 450
! 85
! 1,435
|} |}


== References ==
<nowiki>*</nowiki> Payment made in prior settlement of Research Analyst conflicts.

{{reflist}}


==External links== == External links ==
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161024085813/http://www.finra.org/industry/2003-global-settlement |date=2016-10-24 }}
*
*
*


] ]
] ]

Latest revision as of 21:27, 7 June 2024

US financial regulatory enforcement in 2003

The Global Analyst Research Settlement was an enforcement agreement reached in the United States on April 28, 2003, between the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (NASD), New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), and ten of the United States's largest investment firms to address issues of conflict of interest within their businesses in relation to recommendations made by financial analyst departments of those firms.

Decision

The central issue at hand that had been judged in court was the conflict of interest between the investment banking and analysis departments of ten of the largest investment firms in the United States. The investment firms involved in the settlement had all engaged in actions and practices that had allowed the inappropriate influence of their research analysts by their investment bankers seeking lucrative fees. A typical violation addressed by the settlement was the case of CSFB and Salomon Smith Barney, which were alleged to have engaged in inappropriate spinning of "hot" initial public offerings (IPOs) and issued fraudulent research reports in violation of various sections within the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Similarly, UBS Warburg and Piper Jaffray were alleged to have received payments for investment research without disclosing such payments in violation of the Securities Act of 1933.

Enforcement actions

As part of the settlement decision published on December 20, 2002, several regulations designed to prevent the abuse stemming from pressure by investment bankers on analysts to provide "favorable" appraisals were instantiated. Namely, these firms would have to literally insulate their banking and analysis departments from each other physically and with Chinese walls. Additionally, budget allocation via management in research departments will be independent of investment departments. Research analysts will also be prohibited from going on pitches and roadshows with bankers during advertising and promotion of IPOs. Similarly, the Global Settlement also increased the IPO "quiet period" from 25 days to 40 days. Finally, research analyst's historical ratings must be disclosed and made available.

Other than these regulatory actions, the firms involved in the settlement have been required to pay fines to their investors, to fund investor education, and to pay for independent third-party market research. A total fine of $1.435 billion was assessed and is described in the table below.

Payments

Name of firm Retrospective relief
($ millions) 		Independent research
($ millions) 		Investor education
($ millions) 		Total
($ millions)
Bear Stearns & Co. LLC 50 25 5 80
Credit Suisse First Boston Corp. 150 50 0 200
Deutsche Bank 50 25 5 80
Goldman Sachs 50 50 10 110
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. 50 25 5 80
Lehman Brothers Inc. 50 25 5 80
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc 100 75 25 200
Morgan Stanley 50 75 0 125
Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. 300 75 25 400
UBS Warburg LLC 50 25 5 80
Total 900 450 85 1,435

References

  1. ^ Ten of Nation's Top Investment Firms Settle Enforcement Actions Involving Conflict of Interest, April 28, 2003, archived from the original on September 24, 2014, retrieved July 10, 2007
  2. SEC factsheet on Global Analyst Research Settlement, April 28, 2003, archived from the original on August 8, 2007, retrieved September 1, 2007
  3. "SEC, NY Attorney General, NASD, NASAA, NYSE and State Regulators Announce Historic Agreement to Reform Investment Practices". Office of New York State Attorney General. 2002-12-20. Archived from the original on 2009-10-15. Retrieved 2008-09-05.
  4. "Spitzer Returns, Taking Aim Again at Financial Analysts". Archived from the original on 2017-12-03. Retrieved 2017-03-05.

External links

Categories: