| Revision as of 13:27, 27 May 2018 editOfficer781 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,368 edits →Come back← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:58, 17 October 2019 edit undoWolfdog (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,839 edits →Another potential G-Zay sock | ||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| :] | :] | ||
| :] | :] | ||
| :] | |||
| }} | }} | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == |
== Another potential G-Zay sock == | ||
| {{user|Wachenroder}} sure seems like another sock account of G-Zay, and since you have expedience doing some of the prior investigation posts (I have no idea how to start one or I would have myself), I thought I'd let you know. ~ ] <sup>(])</sup> 18:38, 17 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| When you add a reply, can you keep the section link (<code>/* ... */</code>) in the edit summary? It makes it easier to track conversations in the watchlist and revision history. Thanks. ] (]) 10:49, 22 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :You're looking for {{u|Kbb2}}. ] (]) 23:58, 17 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| So... could you do that or not? JFYI, what I usually do is press {{key press|Tab}} {{key press|Right}} <ins>when the focus is on the edit box</ins> and then enter e.g. "re", then hit Enter to publish the changes. ] (]) 10:46, 24 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :{{replyto|Nardog}} I'll write that somewhere, thanks. I actually have no idea why I'm doing that, maybe I just want my edit summaries to be shorter. ] (]) 12:37, 24 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::] ] (]) 13:06, 24 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == May 2018 == | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' for using the "thanks" function for harassment. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the ], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. ] | ] 18:48, 26 May 2018 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-block --> | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="background:#ffe0e0; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height: 40px"> | |||
| ] '''Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an ] has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.''' | |||
| <span class="plainlinks" style="font-size:88%;">( • • • • ]<span class="sysop-show"> • ]</span> • • }}<span class="sysop-show"> • ] • </span> • ], unblock request}}}} checkuser] ()) </span> | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| ---- | |||
| If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the ], then contact administrators by submitting a request to the '']''. If the block is a ] or ] block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the ].<br><small>Please note that there could be appeals to the ] that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.</small><p> ] | ] 19:38, 26 May 2018 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:Blocked talk-revoked-notice --> | |||
| *Mr KEBAB, I've removed your intemperate post and revoked talkpage access during the remainder of the block. Exploding over a block is something I have understanding of — a block is a shock — and you're still welcome back after it. ] | ] 19:40, 26 May 2018 (UTC). | |||
| == Come back == | |||
| I was just editing and came across this. Am not sure of the background but I figure a fight got raw after awhile. Just penning this to let you know I appreciate your contributions here and would like you to come back. I would think a few others who worked with you do too. Had a fair share of raw arguments in real life so I guess it's kind of normal. I just feel that if Misplaced Pages loses you just because of this reason it's quite sad.--] (]) 13:27, 27 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:58, 17 October 2019
 Archives |
Another potential G-Zay sock
Wachenroder (talk · contribs) sure seems like another sock account of G-Zay, and since you have expedience doing some of the prior investigation posts (I have no idea how to start one or I would have myself), I thought I'd let you know. ~ Dissident93 18:38, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- You're looking for Kbb2. Wolfdog (talk) 23:58, 17 October 2019 (UTC)