Misplaced Pages

Superstition: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:49, 3 June 2018 editDrobertpowell (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users980 edits Mechanisms: Replaced URL with archived version in citation.← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:40, 25 December 2024 edit undoWittypediaEditor (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,601 edits See also: added magical thinkingTags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit App section source 
(473 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Belief or behavior that is considered irrational or supernatural}}
{{Other uses}} {{Other uses}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2023}}
{{pp-move-indef}}
{{multiple issues|
] on a wall, etched with the Hebrew word for "good luck", believed to protect the inhabitants of the house from harm]]
{{Fringe theories|date=October 2023}}
{{cleanup rewrite|date=October 2023}}
}}
{{Anthropology of religion|Basic}}
A '''superstition''' is any ] or practice considered by non-practitioners to be ] or ], attributed to ] or ], perceived supernatural influence, or ] of that which is unknown. It is commonly applied to beliefs and practices surrounding ], ]s, ], ], ], and certain ] ], particularly the belief that future events can be foretold by specific unrelated prior events.<ref name =vyse21>{{cite book|last=Vyse|first=Stuart A.|author-link=Stuart Vyse|title=Believing in Magic: The Psychology of Superstition|year=2000|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=Oxford, England|isbn=978-0-1951-3634-0|pages=19–22}}</ref><ref name=":2">{{Cite book|last=Chardonnens|first=L. S.|url=https://brill.com/view/book/9789047420422/Bej.9789004158290.i-608_006.xml|title=Chapter Four. Superstition and prognostication|year= 2007|publisher=Brill|isbn=978-90-474-2042-2|language=en|access-date=28 December 2020|archive-date=18 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210118173448/https://brill.com/view/book/9789047420422/Bej.9789004158290.i-608_006.xml|url-status=live}}</ref>

{{Paranormal}} {{Paranormal}}


The word ''superstition'' is also used to refer to a religion not practiced by the majority of a given society regardless of whether the prevailing religion contains alleged superstitions or to all religions by the ].<ref name="vyse21" />
'''Superstition''' is a pejorative term for any belief or practice that is considered irrational: for example, if it arises from ignorance, a misunderstanding of science or ], a positive belief in fate or magic, or fear of that which is unknown. "Superstition" also refers to ] beliefs or actions arising from ].<ref>cf. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/superstition</ref>
] and evil in general, as detailed in the folklore text Popular Beliefs and Superstitions from ].<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/10710532|title=Popular beliefs and superstitions from Utah|date=1984|publisher=University of Utah Press|others=Cannon, Anthon S. (Anthon Steffensen), 1906-1976., Hand, Wayland D. (Wayland Debs), 1907-1986., Talley, Jeannine.|isbn=9780874802368|location=Salt Lake City|oclc=10710532}}</ref> ]]
The word ''superstition'' is often used to refer to a religion not practiced by the majority of a given society regardless of whether the prevailing religion contains alleged superstitions.<ref name="vyse21" /> It is also commonly applied to beliefs and practices surrounding ], prophecy, and certain ]s, particularly the belief that future events can be foretold by specific (apparently) unrelated prior events.<ref name =vyse21>{{cite book |last=Vyse |first=Stuart A |title=Believing in Magic: The Psychology of Superstition |year=2000 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford, England |isbn=978-0-1951-3634-0 |pages=19–22}}</ref>


== Contemporary use ==
Due to the pejorative implications of the term, items referred to in common parlance as ''superstition'' are commonly referred to as ] in ].<Ref name="FOLKLORISTICS">For discussion, see for example Georges, Robert A. & Jones, Michael Owen. 1995. ''Folkloristics: An Introduction'', p. 122. ]. {{ISBN|0253329345}}.</ref>
Definitions of the term vary, but they commonly describe superstitions as irrational beliefs at odds with scientific knowledge of the world. ] proposes that a superstition's "presumed mechanism of action is inconsistent with our understanding of the physical world", with Jane Risen adding that these beliefs are not merely scientifically wrong but impossible.<ref name=VS>{{Cite book |last=Vyse |first=Stuart |title=Superstition: A Very Short Introduction |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2020 |isbn=978-0198819257}}</ref><ref name=Risen/> Similarly, Lysann Damisch defines superstition as "irrational beliefs that an object, action, or circumstance that is not logically related to a course of events influences its outcome."<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Damisch|first1=Lysann|last2=Stoberock|first2=Barbara|last3=Mussweiler|first3=Thomas|date=1 July 2010|title=Keep Your Fingers Crossed!: How Superstition Improves Performance|url=https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610372631|journal=Psychological Science|language=en|volume=21|issue=7|pages=1014–1020|doi=10.1177/0956797610372631|pmid=20511389|s2cid=8862493|issn=0956-7976}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Tosyali|first1=Furkan|last2=Aktas|first2=Busra|date=1 December 2021|title=Does training analytical thinking decrease superstitious beliefs? Relationship between analytical thinking, intrinsic religiosity, and superstitious beliefs|url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886921005018|journal=Personality and Individual Differences|language=en|volume=183|pages=111122|doi=10.1016/j.paid.2021.111122|s2cid=237658088 |issn=0191-8869}}</ref> ] says they "presuppose an erroneous understanding about cause and effect, that have been rejected by modern science."<ref name=":6">{{Cite book|last=Martin|first=Dale B.|author-link=Dale Martin (scholar)|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fjTU6YmauZwC|title=Inventing Superstition|year=2009|publisher=Harvard University Press|isbn=978-0-674-04069-4|pages=10–20|language=en}}</ref> The '']''<ref name=OED>{{Cite web|date=September 2021|title=superstition, n.|url=https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/194517|access-date=28 November 2021|website=OED Online|publisher=]|language=en}}</ref> describes them as "irrational, unfounded", ] as "a false conception about causation or belief or practice",<ref name=":3">{{Cite web|title=Definition of SUPERSTITION|url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/superstition|access-date=30 December 2020|website=www.merriam-webster.com|language=en|archive-date=7 October 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081007152508/https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/superstition|url-status=live}}</ref> and the ] as "sans grounding in human reason or scientific knowledge".<ref>{{Cite web|title=Superstition meaning in the Cambridge English Dictionary|url=https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/superstition|access-date=30 December 2020|website=dictionary.cambridge.org|language=en|archive-date=8 November 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181108184349/https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/superstition|url-status=live}}</ref> This notion of superstitious practices is not causally related to the outcomes.<ref name=":7">{{Cite journal|last1=Carlson|first1=Brad D.|last2=Mowen|first2=John C.|last3=Fang|first3=Xiang|date=2009|title=Trait superstition and consumer behavior: Re-conceptualization, measurement, and initial investigations|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/mar.20295|journal=Psychology & Marketing|language=en|volume=26|issue=8|pages=691 of 689–713|doi=10.1002/mar.20295|issn=1520-6793|access-date=3 January 2021|archive-date=18 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210118174412/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/mar.20295|url-status=live}}</ref> <!-- This journal article has been cited by fifty plus consumer behavior related journals and John C. Mowen seems to have been used as ref in some of other wikipedia articles earlier -->


Both Vyse and Martin argue that what is considered superstitious varies across cultures and time. For Vyse, "if a culture has not yet adopted science as its standard, then what we consider magic or superstition is more accurately the local science or religion."<ref name=VS/> Dale points out that superstitions are often considered out of place in modern times and are influenced by modern science and its notions of what is rational or irrational, surviving as remnants of older popular beliefs and practices.<ref name=":3"/>
==Etymology==
] consider ]s to signify good or bad ]]]
The word ''superstition'' is first used in English in the 15th century, modelled after an earlier French ''superstition''.
The earliest known use as an English noun occurs in '']'' (ca. 1420), where the '']'' are enumerated as ''], supersticions, ], & ].''
The French word, together with its Romance cognates (Italian ''superstizione'', Spanish ''superstición'', Portuguese ''superstição'', Catalan ''superstició'') continues Latin ''superstitio''.


Vyse proposes that in addition to being irrational and culturally dependent, superstitions have to be instrumental; an actual effect is expected by the person holding a belief, such as increased odds of winning a prize. This distinction excludes practices where participants merely expect to be entertained.<ref name=VS/>
While the formation of the Latin word is clear, from the verb '']'', "to stand over, stand upon; survive", its original intended sense is less clear. It can be interpreted as "‘standing over a thing in amazement or awe",<ref>"orig. a standing still over or by a thing; hence, amazement, wonder, dread, esp. of the divine or supernatural." Charlton T. Lewis, Charles Short, .</ref> but other possibilities have been suggested, e.g. the sense of ''excess'', i.e. over scrupulousness or over-ceremoniousness in the performing of religious rites, or else the ''survival'' of old, irrational religious habits.<ref>{{cite book |title=Oxford Latin Dictionary |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1982 |location=Oxford, England}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Turcan |first=Robert |others=Nevill, Antonia (trans.) |title=The Cults of the Roman Empire |publisher=Blackwell |location=Oxford, England |year=1996 |pages=10–12 |isbn=0-631-20047-9}}. {{cite book |title=Oxford English Dictionary |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford, England |year=1989 |edition=Second |quote=The etymological meaning of L. superstitio is perhaps ‘standing over a thing in amazement or awe.’ Other interpretations of the literal meaning have been proposed, e.g., ‘excess in devotion, over-scrupulousness or over-ceremoniousness in religion’ and ‘the survival of old religious habits in the midst of a new order of things’; but such ideas are foreign to ancient Roman thought.}}</ref>


==Alternative religious beliefs as superstition==
The earliest known use as a Latin noun occurs in ], ] and later by ], with the meaning of ''art of divination''.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.giornopaganomemoria.it/superstitio.html|language=Italian|author=Manuela Simeoni|title=Uso della parola superstitio contro i pagani|date=2011-09-04}}</ref> From its use in the ] of ] and ] (1st century BC), the term is used in the pejorative sense it still holds today, of an excessive fear of the gods or unreasonable religious belief, as opposed to '']'', the proper, reasonable awe of the gods. ] derived the term from ''superstitiosi'', lit. those who are "left over", i.e. "survivors", "descendants", connecting it with excessive anxiety of parents in hoping that their children would survive them to perform their necessary funerary rites.<ref>], '']'' '''II''', '''28''' (32), quoted in {{cite book |last=Wagenvoort |first=Hendrik |authorlink=Hendrik Wagenvoort |title=Pietas: selected studies in Roman religion |publisher=Brill |location=Leiden, Netherlands |year=1980 |page=236 |isbn=978-90-04-06195-8}}</ref> While ] distinguishes between ''religio'' and ''superstitio'', ] uses only the term ''religio''<ref>{{cite web |title=De rerum natura |author=Lucretius |url=http://www.latinovivo.com/Testintegrali/Lucrezindex.htm}}</ref> (only with pejorative meaning). Throughout all of his work, he only distinguished between ''ratio'' and ''religio''.
{{See also|folk religion|lived religion|Superstitions in Muslim societies|Evolutionary origin of religions|Evolutionary psychology of religion}}


Religious practices that differ from commonly accepted religions in a given culture are sometimes called superstitious; similarly, new practices brought into an established religious community can also be labeled as superstitious in an attempt to exclude them. Also, an excessive display of devoutness has often been labelled as superstitious behavior.<ref name="vyse21"/><ref>{{Cite web|title=Superstition|url=https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/superstition|access-date=30 December 2020|website=dictionary.cambridge.org|language=en|archive-date=8 November 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181108184349/https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/superstition|url-status=live}}</ref>{{qn|date=September 2024}}<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Selberg |first=Torunn |date=December 2003 |title=Taking Superstitions Seriously |url =https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/30035120.pdf |journal=Folklore |volume=114 |issue=3 |pages=297–306 |doi =10.1080/0015587032000145342 |jstor=30035120 |s2cid=145299302}}</ref>{{qn|date=September 2024}}
The Latin verb ''superstare'' itself is comparatively young, being "perhaps not ante-]", first found in ], and the meaning "to survive" is even younger, found in late or ecclesiastical Latin, for the first time in ]. The use of the noun by Cicero and Horace thus predates the first attestation of the verb.{{citation needed|date=June 2012}} It doesn't exclude that the verb might have been created and used after the name.


In antiquity, the Latin term {{lang | la | superstitio}}, like its equivalent Greek ''deisidaimonia'', became associated with exaggerated ritual and a credulous attitude towards prophecies.<ref>{{Cite book |last =Scheid |first =John |chapter =Superstitio |title=Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Classics |year= 2016 |chapter-url =https://oxfordre.com/classics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.001.0001/acrefore-9780199381135-e-6150 |access-date=1 July 2022 |doi =10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.013.6150 |isbn =978-0-19-938113-5 |archive-date=1 July 2022 |archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20220701234108/https://oxfordre.com/classics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.001.0001/acrefore-9780199381135-e-6150 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=OED/><ref name =vyse21/> Greek and Roman ], who modeled their relations with the gods on political and social terms, scorned the man who constantly trembled with fear at the thought of the gods, as a slave feared a cruel and capricious master. Such fear of the gods was what the Romans meant by "superstition" (Veyne 1987, p.&nbsp;211). ] (106–43 BCE) contrasted {{lang | la | superstitio}} with the ] of his day, stating: {{lang | la | Nec vero superstitione tollenda religio tollitur}} – "One does not destroy religion by destroying superstition".<ref>
The term ''superstitio'', or ''superstitio vana'' "vain superstition", was applied in the 1st century to those religious cults in the ] which were officially outlawed. This concerned the religion of the ]s in particular, which was described as a ''superstitio vana'' by ], and ], outlawed as a ''superstitio Iudaica'' in AD 80 by ].
''De Divinatione'', Book 2, chapter 72, section 148.

</ref>
==Superstition and religion==
Diderot's 18th-century '']'' defines superstition as "any excess of religion in general", and links it specifically with ].<ref>{{Cite journal |url=http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=did;cc=did;rgn=main;view=text;idno=did2222.0000.629 |title=Superstition |journal =Encyclopedia of Diderot & d'Alembert – Collaborative Translation Project |access-date =1 April 2015 |date =10 October 2010 |last1 =Louis |first1 =Chevalier de Jaucourt (Biography) |archive-date=19 November 2015 |archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20151119060008/http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=did;cc=did;rgn=main;view=text;idno=did2222.0000.629 |url-status =live }}</ref>
{{See also|Evolutionary psychology of religion|Evolutionary origin of religions}}
<!-- Deleted image removed: ] -->
Greek and Roman ], who modeled their relations with the gods on political and social terms, scorned the man who constantly trembled with fear at the thought of the gods, as a slave feared a cruel and capricious master. Such fear of the gods was what the Romans meant by "superstition" (Veyne 1987, p.&nbsp;211).

Diderot's '']'' defines superstition as "any excess of religion in general", and links it specifically with ].<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=did;cc=did;rgn=main;view=text;idno=did2222.0000.629 |title=Superstition |accessdate=1 April 2015}}</ref>
<!-- <!--
this is a mistake by Chambers, perhaps interesting for ], but irrelevant here: this is a mistake by Chambers, perhaps interesting for ], but irrelevant here:
('']''<ref name="Martin2004">{{cite book |last=Martin |first=Dale B. |title=Inventing superstition: from the Hippocratics to the Christians |year=2004 |publisher=Harvard University Press |location=Cambridge, MA |isbn=0-674-01534-7 |page=80}}</ref><ref name=chambers>{{cite web |last=The Earl of Shaftesbury |first=Antony Cooper |title=Chambers's Cyclopaedia of English Literature, Volume 2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pc8iAAAAMAAJ&q=%22denoted+the+lady+superstitious+(deisidaimonia%22&dq=%22denoted+the+lady+superstitious+(deisidaimonia%22&hl=de&sa=X&ei=o_zpToGjJ-7E4gSnlJSQCQ&ved=0CDAQ6AEwAA |work=Advice to an Author |publisher=W. & R. Chambers, Limited |accessdate=28 March 2011 |author=Robert Chambers |coauthors=David Patrick (New Edition) |location=London & Edinburgh |page=170 |language=English |year=1902 |quote= 'This to hear Would Desdemona seriously incline.' ...But why, amongst his Greek names, he should have chosen one denoted the lady superstitious (deisidaimonia in Greek means superstition) I can't imagine...}}</ref>) ('']''<ref name="Martin2004">{{cite book |last=Martin |first=Dale B. |title=Inventing superstition: from the Hippocratics to the Christians |url=https://archive.org/details/inventingsuperst00mart |url-access=limited |year=2004 |publisher=Harvard University Press |location=Cambridge, MA |isbn=0-674-01534-7 |page=}}</ref><ref name=chambers>{{cite web |last=The Earl of Shaftesbury |first=Antony Cooper |title=Chambers's Cyclopaedia of English Literature, Volume 2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pc8iAAAAMAAJ&q=%22denoted+the+lady+superstitious+(deisidaimonia%22|work=Advice to an Author |publisher=W. & R. Chambers, Limited |access-date=28 March 2011 |author=Robert Chambers |coauthors=David Patrick (New Edition) |location=London & Edinburgh |page=170 |language=en |year=1902 |quote= 'This to hear Would Desdemona seriously incline.' ...But why, amongst his Greek names, he should have chosen one denoted the lady superstitious (deisidaimonia in Greek means superstition) I can't imagine...}}</ref>)
--> -->


In his '']'', ] (who called the papacy "that fountain and source of all superstitions") accuses the popes of superstition: In his 1520 '']'', ], who called the ] "that fountain and source of all superstitions", accuses the popes of superstition:
<blockquote>For there was scarce another of the celebrated bishoprics that had so few learned pontiffs; only in violence, intrigue, and superstition has it hitherto surpassed the rest. For the men who occupied the Roman&nbsp;See a thousand years ago differ so vastly from those who have since come into power, that one is compelled to refuse the name of Roman pontiff either to the former or to the latter.<ref name="Steinhaeuser1915">{{citation |mode=cs1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Q3xIAAAAMAAJ |title=Works of Martin&nbsp;Luther: With Instructions and Notes |date=1915 |page=291 |chapter=The Babylonian Captivity §&nbsp;The Sacrament of Extreme Unction |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Q3xIAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA291 |last=Luther |first=Martin |editor1-last=Jacobs |editor1-first=Henry Eyster |editor2-last=Spaeth |editor2-first=Adolph |translator-last=Steinhaeuser |translator-first=Albert&nbsp;T.&nbsp;W. |publisher=A.&nbsp;J. Holman Company |location=Philadelphia |volume=2 |lccn=15007839 |oclc=300541097 |quote=For there was scarce another of the celebrated bishoprics that had so few learned pontiffs; only in violence, intrigue, and superstition has it hitherto surpassed the rest. For the men who occupied the Roman&nbsp;See a thousand years ago differ so vastly from those who have since come into power, that one is compelled to refuse the name of Roman pontiff either to the former or to the latter.}}</ref></blockquote> <blockquote>For there was scarce another of the celebrated bishoprics that had so few learned pontiffs; only in violence, intrigue, and superstition has it hitherto surpassed the rest. For the men who occupied the Roman&nbsp;See a thousand years ago differ so vastly from those who have since come into power, that one is compelled to refuse the name of Roman pontiff either to the former or to the latter.<ref name="Steinhaeuser1915">{{citation |mode =cs1 |url =https://books.google.com/books?id=Q3xIAAAAMAAJ |title=Works of Martin&nbsp;Luther: With Instructions and Notes |date =1915 |page=291 |chapter =The Babylonian Captivity §&nbsp;The Sacrament of Extreme Unction |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Q3xIAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA291 |last1 = Luther |first1 =Martin |editor1-last =Jacobs |editor1-first =Henry Eyster |editor2-last =Spaeth |editor2-first =Adolph |translator-last =Steinhaeuser |translator-first =Albert&nbsp;T.&nbsp;W. |publisher =A.&nbsp;J. Holman Company |location =Philadelphia |volume =2 | isbn =9780722221235 |lccn =15007839 |oclc =300541097 |quote =For there was scarce another of the celebrated bishoprics that had so few learned pontiffs; only in violence, intrigue, and superstition has it hitherto surpassed the rest. For the men who occupied the Roman&nbsp;See a thousand years ago differ so vastly from those who have since come into power, that one is compelled to refuse the name of Roman pontiff either to the former or to the latter.}}</ref></blockquote>


The current '']'' considers superstition ]ful in the sense that it denotes "a perverse excess of religion", as a demonstrated lack of ] in ]&nbsp;(¶ 2110), and a violation of the first of the ]. The current '']'' considers superstition ]ful in the sense that it denotes "a perverse excess of religion", as a demonstrated lack of ] in ]&nbsp;(¶ 2110), and a violation of the first of the ].
The ''Catechism'' is a defense against the accusation that Catholic ] is superstitious: The ''Catechism'' represents a defense against the accusation that Catholic ] is superstitious:
<blockquote>Superstition is a deviation of religious feeling and of the practices this feeling imposes. It can even affect the worship we offer the true God, e.g., when one attributes an importance in some way magical to certain practices otherwise lawful or necessary. To attribute the efficacy of prayers or of sacramental signs to their mere external performance, apart from the interior dispositions that they demand is to fall into superstition. Cf. ''{{bibleref|Matthew|23:16–22}}''&nbsp;(¶ 2111)</blockquote> <blockquote>Superstition is a deviation of religious feeling and of the practices this feeling imposes. It can even affect the worship we offer the true God, e.g., when one attributes an importance in some way magical to certain practices otherwise lawful or necessary. To attribute the efficacy of prayers or of sacramental signs to their mere external performance, apart from the interior dispositions that they demand is to fall into superstition. Cf. ''{{bibleverse|Matthew|23:16–22}}''&nbsp;(¶ 2111)</blockquote>


].]] ]''.]]

=== Classifications ===
Dieter Harmening's 1979 book ''Superstitio'' categorizes superstitions in three categories: ], ] and observances.<ref>
{{cite book
|last1 = Harmening
|first1 = Dieter
|year = 1979
|chapter =
|title = Superstitio: Überlieferungs- und theoriegeschichtliche Untersuchungen zur kirchlich-theologischen Aberglaubensliteratur des Mittelalters
|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=ITDjAtgNqWUC
|language = German
|volume = 1
|publication-place = Berlin
|publisher = Erich Schmidt Verlag GmbH & Co KG
|page =
|isbn = 9783503012916
|quote =
}}
</ref>{{pn|date=September 2024}}
The observances category subdivides into ] and "time".<ref name=":2" />{{qn|date=September 2024}} The time sub-category constitutes temporal prognostics like observances of various days related like ], ], year prognosis and ], whereas the signs category constitutes signs such as particular animal behaviors (like the call of birds or the neighing of horses) or the sighting of comets, or dreams.<ref name=":2" /> According to László Sándor Chardonnens, the signs subcategory usually needs an observer who might help in interpreting the signs and such observer does not need necessarily to be an active participant in the observation.<ref name=":2" /><ref>
Compare:
{{cite book
|last1 = Chardonnens
|first1 = László Sándor
|year = 2007
|chapter = Superstition and Prognostication
|title = Anglo-Saxon Prognostics, 900–1100: Study and Texts
|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=CZS6CsIkCRoC
|series = Volume 153 of Brill's studies in intellectual history: Brill's Texts and Sources in Intellectual History, volume 3
|publication-place = Leiden
|publisher = Brill
|page = 105
|isbn = 9789004158290
|access-date = 29 September 2024
|quote = the observation of signs and times simply entails observibng properly and interpreting the results. This branch of superstition requires an observer who interprets the findings, but this observer need not participate in any activity to disclose that which is to be observed.
}}
</ref>
According to Chardonnens, a participant in the category of divination may need to go beyond mere observation and need to be active participant in a given action.<ref name=":2" /> Examples of divination superstitions include ], ], ], ], ], ] and ].<ref name=":2" /> Chardonnens says superstitions belonging to the magic category are exceedingly hermetical and ritualistic: examples include witchcraft, potions, ]s, amulets etc.<ref name=":2" /> Chardonnens says that the observation category needs an observer, divination category needs a participant to tell what is to be observed, whereas magic requires a participant who must follow a protocol to influence the future, and that these three types of superstition need increasing stages of participation and knowledge.<ref name=":2" />

Chardonnens defines "prognostication" as that component of superstition which expects knowledge of the future on systematic application of given ritual and order,<ref name=":2" /><ref>
{{cite book
|last1 = Chardonnens
|first1 = László Sándor
|year = 2007
|chapter = Superstition and Prognostication
|title = Anglo-Saxon Prognostics, 900–1100: Study and Texts
|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=CZS6CsIkCRoC
|series = Volume 153 of Brill's studies in intellectual history: Brill's Texts and Sources in Intellectual History, volume 3
|publication-place = Leiden
|publisher = Brill
|page = 103
|isbn = 9789004158290
|access-date = 29 September 2024
|quote = medieval prognosticatory superstition, which I describe as a aystem which, if properly applied, yields knowledge of the future. This working definition asserts that prognostication is a component of superstition. Moreover, the working definition makes clear that prognostication is systematic, not random, and that it relies on ritual and order.
}}
</ref>
and moves to classify it, writing: "Prognostication seems to occupy a place somewhere between observation and divination, of which the observation of times is represented most frequently due to the primacy of temporal prognostics..<ref name=":2" /><ref>
{{cite book
|last1 = Chardonnens
|first1 = László Sándor
|year = 2007
|chapter = Superstition and Prognostication
|title = Anglo-Saxon Prognostics, 900–1100: Study and Texts
|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=CZS6CsIkCRoC
|series = Volume 153 of Brill's studies in intellectual history: Brill's Texts and Sources in Intellectual History, volume 3
|publication-place = Leiden
|publisher = Brill
|page = 107
|isbn = 9789004158290
|access-date = 29 September 2024
|quote = Prognostication seems to occupy a place somewhere between observation and divination, of which the observation of times is represented most frequently due to the primacy of temporal prognostics.
}}
</ref><ref>
{{cite book
|last1 = Chardonnens
|first1 = László Sándor
|year = 2007
|chapter = Superstition and Prognostication
|title = Anglo-Saxon Prognostics, 900–1100: Study and Texts
|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=CZS6CsIkCRoC
|series = Volume 153 of Brill's studies in intellectual history: Brill's Texts and Sources in Intellectual History, volume 3
|publication-place = Leiden
|publisher = Brill
|page = 105
|isbn = 9789004158290
|access-date = 29 September 2024
|quote = The group of observation of times contains all temporal prognostics, which make up the larger part of the English prognostic corpus.
}}
</ref>

Chardonnens classifies prophecy under the topic of divination; examples including the ] of the ], biblical ] allegory, the ], and the many prophecies expressed by ]; Chardonnens further points out that since many aspects of religious experience are tied up with prophecy, the medieval ] condones the same.<ref name=":2" /><ref>
{{cite book
|last1 = Chardonnens
|first1 = László Sándor
|year = 2007
|chapter = Superstition and Prognostication
|title = Anglo-Saxon Prognostics, 900–1100: Study and Texts
|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=CZS6CsIkCRoC
|series = Volume 153 of Brill's studies in intellectual history: Brill's Texts and Sources in Intellectual History, volume 3
|publication-place = Leiden
|publisher = Brill
|page = 108
|isbn = 9789004158290
|access-date = 29 September 2024
|quote = Prophecy is a type of divination which is condoned by the church, since many aspects of the religious experience are tied up with prophecy. Examples include the prophets of the Old Testament, biblical typological allegory, the fifteen signs before Judgement Day, and the many prophecies uttered by saints.
}}
</ref>
Chardonnens says, one could differentiate between those kinds of prophecy which are (1) inspired by God or Satan and their minions; (2) "gecyndelic"; and (3) "wiglung" examples —lacking divine or infernal inspiration and not "gecyndelic" either. But practically, however, most, if not all, words relating to prophecy ought to be interpreted as inspired.<ref name=":2" />

=== Criticism of definitions ===
Identifying something as ''superstition'' generally expresses a pejorative view. Items referred to as such in common parlance are commonly referred to as ] in ].<ref name="FOLKLORISTICS">For discussion, see for example Georges, Robert A. & Jones, Michael Owen. 1995. ''Folkloristics: An Introduction'', p. 122. ]. {{ISBN|0253329345}}.</ref>

According to László Sándor Chardonnens, ] (OED) definitions pass value-judgement and attribution to "fear and ignorance" without doing enough justice to elaborate systems of superstitions.<ref name=":2" /> Chardonnens says the religious element in OED denotations is not understood as a system of observance and testifies to a belief in higher power on part of the compiler of the dictionary.<ref name=":2" />

==== Subjective perceptions ====
Richard Webster's ''The Encyclopedia of Superstitions'' points out that many superstitions have connections with religion, that people may hold individual subjective perceptions ''vis à vis'' superstitions against one another (people of one belief are likely to call people of another belief superstitious); Constantine regarded paganism as a superstition; Tacitus on other hand regarded Christianity as a pernicious superstition; ] and ] perceived any thing that was not centered on Christ to be superstitious.<ref name=":5">{{Cite book|last =Webster|first =Richard|url =https://books.google.com/books?id=m1-xCL47_7QC|title =The Encyclopedia of Superstitions|publisher =Llewellyn Worldwide|year = 2012|isbn =978-0-7387-2561-1|page =xi |publication-place = Woodbury, Minnesota |language =en | quote = There are many superstitions connected with religion, and people who belong to one faith are likely to consider people with different beliefs superstitious. Constantine considered paganism a superstition. Tacitus, on the other hand, considered Christianity a pernicious superstition. Martin Luther said that anything that does not center on Christ was superstition. St. Paul also believed this .}}</ref> According to Dale Martin, difference of opinion on what constitutes "superstition" may become apparent when one moves from one culture to another culture.<ref>
{{cite book
|last1 = Martin
|first1 = Dale Basil
|author-link1 = Dale Martin (scholar)
|date = 1 July 2009
|chapter = Problems of Definition
|title = Inventing Superstition: From the Hippocratics to the Christians
|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=fjTU6YmauZwC
|publisher = Harvard University Press
|page = 11
|isbn = 9780674040694
|access-date = 29 September 2024
|quote = Disagreements about what counts as 'superstition' will usually be exacerbated when we move from one culture to another.
}}
</ref>

===Etymology===
While the formation of the Latin word is clear, from the verb '']'', "to stand over, stand upon; survive", its original intended sense is less clear. It can be interpreted as "'standing over a thing in amazement or awe",<ref>"orig. a standing still over or by a thing; hence, amazement, wonder, dread, esp. of the divine or supernatural." Charlton T. Lewis, Charles Short, {{Webarchive|url =https://web.archive.org/web/20200808040852/http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=superstitio&fromdoc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.04.0059 |date =8 August 2020 }}.</ref> but other possibilities have been suggested, e.g. the sense of ''excess'', i.e. over-scrupulousness or over-ceremoniousness in the performing of religious rites, or else the ''survival'' of old, irrational religious habits.<ref>{{cite book|title =Oxford Latin Dictionary|publisher =Oxford University Press|year =1982|location =Oxford, England}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last =Turcan|first =Robert|url=https://archive.org/details/cultsofromanempi00robe|title =The Cults of the Roman Empire|publisher =Blackwell|others =Nevill, Antonia (trans.)|year=1996|isbn=978-0-631-20047-5|location=Oxford, England|pages=|url-access=registration}}. {{cite book|url =https://archive.org/details/oxfordenglishdic0006unse|title =Oxford English Dictionary|publisher =Oxford University Press|year =1989|edition =Second|location =Oxford, England|quote =The etymological meaning of L. superstitio is perhaps 'standing over a thing in amazement or awe.' Other interpretations of the literal meaning have been proposed, e.g., 'excess in devotion, over-scrupulousness or over-ceremoniousness in religion' and 'the survival of old religious habits in the midst of a new order of things'; but such ideas are foreign to ancient Roman thought.|url-access=registration}}</ref>

The earliest known use as a noun is found in ], ] and later in ], with the meaning of ''art of divination''.<ref>{{cite web|author =Manuela Simeoni|date =4 September 2011|title =Uso della parola superstitio contro i pagani|url =http://www.giornopaganomemoria.it/superstitio.html|language =it|access-date =3 August 2015|archive-date =19 November 2015|archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20151119124403/http://www.giornopaganomemoria.it/superstitio.html|url-status =live}}</ref> From its use in the ] of ] and ], it is used in the pejorative sense that it holds today: of an excessive fear of the gods or unreasonable religious belief; as opposed to '']'', the proper, reasonable awe of the gods. ] derived the term from ''superstitiosi'', lit. those who are "left over", i.e. "survivors", "descendants", connecting it with excessive anxiety of parents in hoping that their children would survive them to perform their necessary funerary rites.<ref>], '']'' '''II''', '''28''' (32), quoted in {{cite book|last =Wagenvoort|first =Hendrik|url =https://archive.org/details/pietasselectedst0000wage/page/236|title =Pietas: selected studies in Roman religion|publisher =Brill|year =1980|isbn =978-90-04-06195-8|location =Leiden, Netherlands|page =|author-link =Hendrik Wagenvoort|url-access =registration}}</ref>

According to Michael David Bailey, it was with Pliny's usage that magic came close to superstition; and charges of being superstitious were first leveled by Roman authorities on their Christian subjects. In turn, early Christian writers saw all Roman and Pagan cults as superstitious, worshipping false Gods, fallen angels and demons. With Christian usage almost all forms of magic started being described as forms of superstition.<ref name=":12">{{Cite book|last =Bailey, Michael David, 1971–|url =https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/70267160|title =Magic and superstition in Europe : a concise history from antiquity to the present|date =2007|publisher =Rowman & Littlefield Pub|isbn =978-0-7425-3386-8|location =Lanham|oclc =70267160}}
</ref>


==Superstition and psychology== ==Superstition and psychology==
Line 49: Line 187:
=== Origins === === Origins ===
====Behaviorism perspective==== ====Behaviorism perspective====
In 1948, behavioral psychologist ] published an article in the ''Journal of Experimental Psychology'', in which he described his ]s exhibiting what appeared to be superstitious behaviour. One pigeon was making turns in its cage, another would swing its head in a pendulum motion, while others also displayed a variety of other behaviours. Because these behaviors were all done ritualistically in an attempt to receive food from a dispenser, even though the dispenser had already been programmed to release food at set time intervals regardless of the pigeons' actions, Skinner believed that the pigeons were trying to influence their feeding schedule by performing these actions. He then extended this as a proposition regarding the nature of superstitious behavior in humans.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Skinner |first=B. F. |year=1948 |url=http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Skinner/Pigeon/ |title='Superstition' in the Pigeon |journal=Journal of Experimental Psychology |volume=38 |issue=2 |pages=168–172 |doi=10.1037/h0055873 |pmid=18913665}}</ref> In 1948, behavioral psychologist ] published an article in the ''Journal of Experimental Psychology'', in which he described his ]s exhibiting what appeared to be superstitious behaviour. One pigeon was making turns in its cage, another would swing its head in a pendulum motion, while others also displayed a variety of other behaviours. Because these behaviors were all done ritualistically in an attempt to receive food from a dispenser, even though the dispenser had already been programmed to release food at set time intervals regardless of the pigeons' actions, Skinner believed that the pigeons were trying to influence their feeding schedule by performing these actions. He then extended this as a proposition regarding the nature of superstitious behavior in humans.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Skinner|first=B. F.|year=1948|url=http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Skinner/Pigeon/|title='Superstition' in the Pigeon|journal=Journal of Experimental Psychology|volume=38|issue=2|pages=168–172|doi=10.1037/h0055873|pmid=18913665|s2cid=22577459|access-date=27 August 2007|archive-date=21 November 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191121090801/http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Skinner/Pigeon/|url-status=live}}</ref>


Skinner's theory regarding superstition being the nature of the pigeons' behaviour has been challenged by other psychologists such as Staddon and Simmelhag, who theorised an alternative explanation for the pigeons' behaviour.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Staddon |first=J. E. |lastauthoramp=yes |last2=Simmelhag |first2=V. L. |year=1971 |title=The 'supersitition' experiment: A reexamination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behaviour |journal=Psychological Review |volume=78 |issue=1 |pages=3–43 |doi=10.1037/h0030305}}</ref> Skinner's theory regarding superstition being the nature of the pigeons' behaviour has been challenged by other psychologists such as Staddon and Simmelhag, who theorised an alternative explanation for the pigeons' behaviour.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Staddon|first1=J. E.|name-list-style=amp|last2=Simmelhag|first2=V. L.|year=1971|title=The 'supersitition' experiment: A reexamination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behaviour|journal=Psychological Review|volume=78|issue=1|pages=3–43|doi=10.1037/h0030305}}</ref>


Despite challenges to Skinner's interpretation of the root of his pigeons' superstitious behaviour, his conception of the ] has been used to explain superstitious behaviour in humans. Originally, in Skinner's animal research, "some pigeons responded up to 10,000 times without reinforcement when they had originally been conditioned on an ''intermittent reinforcement'' basis."<ref name="schultz">Schultz & Schultz (2004, 238).{{full citation needed|date=November 2012}}</ref> Compared to the other reinforcement schedules (e.g., fixed ratio, fixed interval), these behaviours were also the most resistant to ].<ref name="schultz"/> This is called the ''partial reinforcement effect'', and this has been used to explain superstitious behaviour in humans. To be more precise, this effect means that, whenever an individual performs an action expecting a reinforcement, and none seems forthcoming, it actually creates a sense of persistence within the individual.<ref>{{cite book |author1=Carver, Charles S. |author2=Scheier, Michael |lastauthoramp=yes |title=Perspectives on personality |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tEHuAAAAMAAJ |year=2004 |publisher=Allyn and Bacon |isbn=978-0-205-37576-9 |page=332}}</ref> This strongly parallels superstitious behaviour in humans because the individual feels that, by continuing this action, reinforcement will happen; or that reinforcement has come at certain times in the past as a result of this action, although not all the time, but this may be one of those times. Despite challenges to Skinner's interpretation of the root of his pigeons' superstitious behaviour, his conception of the ] has been used to explain superstitious behaviour in humans. Originally, in Skinner's animal research, "some pigeons responded up to 10,000 times without reinforcement when they had originally been conditioned on an ''intermittent reinforcement'' basis."<ref name="schultz">Schultz & Schultz (2004, 238).{{full citation needed|date=November 2012}}</ref> Compared to the other reinforcement schedules (e.g., fixed ratio, fixed interval), these behaviours were also the most resistant to ].<ref name="schultz"/> This is called the ''partial reinforcement effect'', and this has been used to explain superstitious behaviour in humans. To be more precise, this effect means that, whenever an individual performs an action expecting a reinforcement, and none seems forthcoming, it actually creates a sense of persistence within the individual.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Carver|first1=Charles S.|last2=Scheier|first2=Michael|name-list-style=amp|title=Perspectives on personality|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tEHuAAAAMAAJ|year=2004|publisher=Allyn and Bacon|isbn=978-0-205-37576-9|page=332}}</ref>


==== Evolutionary / cognitive perspective ==== ==== Evolutionary/cognitive perspective ====
From a simpler perspective, ] will tend to reinforce a tendency to generate weak associations or ] - rules of thumb - that are overgeneralized. If there is a strong survival advantage to making correct associations, then this will outweigh the negatives of making many incorrect, "superstitious" associations.<ref>{{Cite journal |title=The evolution of superstitious and superstition-like behaviour |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences |author=Foster, Kevin R. and ] |doi=10.1098/rspb.2008.0981 |year=2009 |volume=276 |pmid=18782752 |issue=1654 |pmc=2615824 |pages=31–7}}</ref> It has also been argued that there may be connections between OCD and superstition.<ref>de Silva, Padmal and Rachman, Stanley (2004) ''Obsessive-compulsive Disorder'', Oxford University Press, p. 34, {{ISBN|0198520824}}.</ref> This may be connected to ]. From a simpler perspective, ] will tend to reinforce a tendency to generate weak associations or ] that are overgeneralized. If there is a strong survival advantage to making correct associations, then this will outweigh the negatives of making many incorrect, "superstitious" associations.<ref>{{cite journal|title=The evolution of superstitious and superstition-like behaviour |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences|last1=Foster|first1=Kevin R.|last2=Kokko|first2=Hanna|author2-link=Hanna Kokko|doi=10.1098/rspb.2008.0981 |year=2009 |volume=276 |pmid=18782752 |issue=1654 |pmc=2615824 |pages=31–7}}</ref> It has also been argued that there may be connections between OCD and superstition.<ref>de Silva, Padmal and Rachman, Stanley (2004) ''Obsessive-compulsive Disorder'', Oxford University Press, p. 34, {{ISBN|0198520824}}.</ref> It is stated that superstition is at the end of the day long-held beliefs that are rooted in coincidence and/or cultural tradition rather than logic and facts.<ref>{{Cite web |last=University |first=Manchester Metropolitan |title=Story, Manchester Metropolitan University |url=https://www.mmu.ac.uk/news-and-events/news/story/8081/#:~:text=Psychologists%20who%20have%20investigated%20what,protect%20you%20from%20bad%20luck. |access-date=2023-10-17 |website=Manchester Metropolitan University |language=en}}</ref>


OCD that involves superstition is often referred to as "Magical Thinking" <ref name=":9">{{Cite web |date=2024-01-20 |title=Magical Thinking OCD: Excessive Superstition |url=https://www.simplypsychology.org/magical-thinking.html |access-date=2024-07-02 |language=en-US}}</ref> People with this kind of manifestation of OCD believe that if they do not follow through with a certain compulsion, then something bad will happen to either themselves or others. Superstitious OCD, while can appear in anyone with OCD, more often appears in people with a religious background or with people who grew up in a culture that believes in magic and perform rituals.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Excessive Superstition In Cases Of OCD – Beyond OCD |url=https://beyondocd.org/expert-perspectives/articles/very-superstitious |access-date=2024-07-02 |language=en-US |archive-date=24 February 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240224152441/https://beyondocd.org/expert-perspectives/articles/very-superstitious |url-status=live }}</ref> Like stated before in the article above, superstition and prophecies are sometimes linked together. People with religious or superstitious OCD may have compulsions and perform or behaviors in order to fulfill or get closer to fulfilling a prophecy.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Baker |first=Derek |title=My Battle with Religious OCD |url=https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/eng/ensign/2019/09/young-adults/my-battle-with-religious-ocd |access-date=2024-07-02 |website=www.churchofjesuschrist.org |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |last1=Mocan |first1=Naci H. |title=Can Superstition Create a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy? School Outcomes of Dragon Children of China |date=August 2017 |type=Working Paper |url=https://www.nber.org/papers/w23709 |access-date=2024-07-02 |series=Working Paper Series |doi=10.3386/w23709 |last2=Yu |first2=Han}}</ref> Those with "magical thinking" OCD may realize that doing an action will not actually 'save' someone, but the fear that if they do not perform a certain behavior someone could get hurt is so overwhelming that they do it just to be sure. People with superstitious OCD will go out of their way to avoid something deemed 'unlucky'. Such as the 13th floor of a building, the 13th room, certain numbers or colors, because if they do not they believe something horrible may happen. Though superstitious OCD may work in reverse where one will always wear a certain item of clothing or jewelry or carry a certain item like a bag because it brings them 'luck' and allow good things to happen.<ref name=":9" />
A recent theory by Jane Risen proposes that superstitions are intuitions that people acknowledge to be wrong, but acquiesce to rather than correct when they arise as the intuitive assessment of a situation. Her theory draws on ] models of reasoning. In this view, superstitions are the output of "System 1" reasoning that are not corrected even when caught by "System 2".<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Risen|first=Jane L.|title=Believing what we do not believe: Acquiescence to superstitious beliefs and other powerful intuitions.|url=http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/rev0000017|journal=Psychological Review|volume=123|issue=2|pages=182–207|doi=10.1037/rev0000017}}</ref>

A recent theory by Jane Risen proposes that superstitions are intuitions that people acknowledge to be wrong, but acquiesce to rather than correct when they arise as the intuitive assessment of a situation. Her theory draws on ] models of reasoning. In this view, superstitions are the output of "System 1" reasoning that are not corrected even when caught by "System 2".<ref name=Risen>{{Cite journal|last=Risen|first=Jane L.|title=Believing what we do not believe: Acquiescence to superstitious beliefs and other powerful intuitions.|journal=Psychological Review|volume=123|issue=2|pages=182–207|doi=10.1037/rev0000017|pmid=26479707|year=2016|s2cid=14384232 }}</ref>


=== Mechanisms === === Mechanisms ===
People seem to believe that superstitions influence events by changing the likelihood of currently possible outcomes rather than by creating new possible outcomes. In sporting events, for example, a lucky ritual or object is thought to increase the chance that an athlete will perform at the peak of their ability, rather than increasing their overall ability at that sport.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Hamerman|first=Eric J.|last2=Morewedge|first2=Carey K.|date=2015-03-01|title=Reliance on Luck Identifying Which Achievement Goals Elicit Superstitious Behavior|url=http://psp.sagepub.com/content/41/3/323|journal=Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin|language=en|volume=41|issue=3|pages=323–335|doi=10.1177/0146167214565055|issn=0146-1672|pmid=25617118}}</ref> Consequently, people whose goal is to perform well are more likely to rely on "supernatural assistance" - lucky items and rituals - than are people whose goal is to improve their skills and abilities and learn in the same context. People seem to believe that superstitions influence events by changing the likelihood of currently possible outcomes rather than by creating new possible outcomes. In sporting events, for example, a lucky ritual or object is thought to increase the chance that an athlete will perform at the peak of their ability, rather than increasing their overall ability at that sport.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Hamerman|first1=Eric J.|last2=Morewedge|first2=Carey K.|date=1 March 2015|title=Reliance on Luck Identifying Which Achievement Goals Elicit Superstitious Behavior|journal=Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin|language=en|volume=41|issue=3|pages=323–335|doi=10.1177/0146167214565055|issn=0146-1672|pmid=25617118|s2cid=1160061}}</ref>


Psychologist Stuart Vyse has pointed out that until about 2010, "ost researchers assumed superstitions were irrational and focused their attentions on discovering why people were superstitious." Vyse went on to describe studies that looked at the relationship between performance and superstitious rituals. Preliminary work has indicated that such rituals can reduce stress and thereby improve performance, but, Vyse has said, "...not because they are superstitious but because they are rituals.... So there is no real magic, but there is a bit of calming magic in performing a ritualistic sequence before attempting a high-pressure activity.... Any old ritual will do."<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Vyse |first1=Stuart |title=Do Superstitious Rituals Work? |journal=] |date=2018 |volume=42 |issue=2 |pages=32-34 |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180603133012/https://www.csicop.org/specialarticles/show/do_superstitious_rituals_work |accessdate=3 June 2018}}</ref> Psychologist ] has pointed out that until about 2010, "ost researchers assumed superstitions were irrational and focused their attentions on discovering why people were superstitious." Vyse went on to describe studies that looked at the relationship between performance and superstitious rituals. Preliminary work has indicated that such rituals can reduce stress and thereby improve performance, but, Vyse has said, "...not because they are superstitious but because they are rituals.... So there is no real magic, but there is a bit of calming magic in performing a ritualistic sequence before attempting a high-pressure activity.... Any old ritual will do."<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Vyse|first1=Stuart|title=Do Superstitious Rituals Work?|journal=]|date=2018|volume=42|issue=2|pages=32–34|url=https://www.csicop.org/specialarticles/show/do_superstitious_rituals_work|access-date=3 June 2018|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180603133012/https://www.csicop.org/specialarticles/show/do_superstitious_rituals_work |archive-date=3 June 2018}}</ref><ref name="VyseSI2020">{{cite journal |last1=Vyse |first1=Stuart |title=Obsessions and compulsions: Do superstitious rituals help cope with anxiety? |journal=] |date=April 2020 |volume=44 |issue=2 |page=52}}</ref>


=== Occurrence === === Occurrence ===
People tend to attribute events to supernatural causes (in psychological jargon, "external causes") most often under two circumstances. People tend to attribute events to supernatural causes (in psychological terms, "external causes") most often under two circumstances.
# People are more likely to attribute an event to a superstitious cause if it is unlikely than if it is likely. In other words, the more surprising the event, the more likely it is to evoke a supernatural explanation. This is believed to stem from an effectance motivation - a basic desire to exert control over one's environment. When no natural cause can explain a situation, attributing an event to a superstitious cause may give people some sense of control and ability to predict what will happen in their environment.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last=Waytz|first=Adam|last2=Morewedge|first2=Carey K.|last3=Epley|first3=Nicholas|last4=Monteleone|first4=George|last5=Gao|first5=Jia-Hong|last6=Cacioppo|first6=John T.|title=Making sense by making sentient: Effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism.|url=http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0020240|journal=Journal of Personality and Social Psychology|volume=99|issue=3|pages=410–435|doi=10.1037/a0020240|pmid=20649365}}</ref> # People are more likely to attribute an event to a superstitious cause if it is unlikely than if it is likely. In other words, the more surprising the event, the more likely it is to evoke a supernatural explanation. This is believed to stem from an effectance motivation a basic desire to exert control over one's environment. When no natural cause can explain a situation, attributing an event to a superstitious cause may give people some sense of control and ability to predict what will happen in their environment.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last1=Waytz|first1=Adam|last2=Morewedge|first2=Carey K.|last3=Epley|first3=Nicholas|last4=Monteleone|first4=George|last5=Gao|first5=Jia-Hong|last6=Cacioppo|first6=John T.|title=Making sense by making sentient: Effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism.|journal=Journal of Personality and Social Psychology|volume=99|issue=3|pages=410–435|doi=10.1037/a0020240|pmid=20649365|year=2010|citeseerx=10.1.1.206.2736}}</ref>
# People are more likely to attribute an event to a superstitious cause if it is negative than positive. This is called ''negative agency bias''.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Morewedge|first=Carey K.|title=Negativity bias in attribution of external agency.|url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0016796|journal=Journal of Experimental Psychology: General|volume=138|issue=4|pages=535–545|doi=10.1037/a0016796|pmid=19883135|year=2009}}</ref> Boston Red Sox fans, for instance, attributed the failure of their team to win the world series for 86 years to the ] a curse placed on the team for trading Babe Ruth to the New York Yankees so that the team owner could fund a Broadway musical. When the Red Sox finally won the world series in 2004, however, the team's success was attributed to skill of the team and the rebuilding effort of the new owner and general manager. More commonly, people are more likely to perceive their computer to act according to its own intentions when it malfunctions than functions properly.<ref name=":0" /> # People are more likely to attribute an event to a superstitious cause if it is negative than positive. This is called '']''.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Morewedge|first=Carey K.|title=Negativity bias in attribution of external agency.|journal=Journal of Experimental Psychology: General|volume=138|issue=4|pages=535–545|doi=10.1037/a0016796|pmid=19883135|year=2009|citeseerx=10.1.1.212.2333}}</ref> Boston Red Sox fans, for instance, attributed the failure of their team to win the world series for 86 years to the ]: a curse placed on the team for trading Babe Ruth to the New York Yankees so that the team owner could fund a Broadway musical. When the Red Sox finally won the world series in 2004, however, the team's success was attributed to the team's skill and the rebuilding effort of the new owner and general manager. More commonly, people are more likely to perceive their computer to act according to its own intentions when it malfunctions than functions properly.<ref name=":0" />

=== Consumer behavior ===
According to ] analytics of John C. Mowen et al., superstitions are employed as a ] hence those influence a variety of consumer behaviors.<ref name=":8">{{Cite journal|last1=Carlson|first1=Brad D.|last2=Mowen|first2=John C.|last3=Fang|first3=Xiang|date=2009|title=Trait superstition and consumer behavior: Re-conceptualization, measurement, and initial investigations|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/mar.20295|journal=Psychology & Marketing|language=en|volume=26|issue=8|pages=689–713|doi=10.1002/mar.20295|issn=1520-6793|access-date=3 January 2021|archive-date=18 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210118174412/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/mar.20295|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=":7" /> John C. Mowen et al. says, after taking into account for a set of antecedents, trait superstitions are predictive of a wide variety of consumer beliefs, like beliefs in astrology or in common negative superstitions (e.g., fear of black cats). A general proneness to be superstitious leads to enduring temperament to gamble, participation in promotional games, investments in stocks, forwarding of superstitious e‐mails, keeping good‐luck charms, and exhibit sport fanship etc.<ref name=":8" /><ref name=":7" /> Additionally it has been estimated that between $700 million and $800 million are lost every Friday the 13th because of people's refusal to travel, purchase major items or conduct business.<ref>{{Cite web |last=CNBC |date=13 August 2010 |title=Friday the 13th Means Millions in Lost Business, Productivity |url=https://www.cnbc.com/id/38691586 |access-date=2 June 2023 |website=] |archive-date=2 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230602090756/https://www.cnbc.com/id/38691586 |url-status=live }}</ref> <!-- This journal article has been cited by fifty plus consumer behavior related journals and John C. Mowen seems to have been used as ref in some of other wikipedia articles earlier -->


==Superstition and politics== ==Superstition and politics==
] historian ] in his '']'' uses the term ''superstition'' explaining that in ] that belief maintained the cohesion of the ], operating as an '']''.<ref>Guy, Josephine M. (2007) ''The Complete Works of Oscar Wilde'', Oxford University Press, Volume IV, p. 337, {{ISBN|0191568449}}.</ref> ] historian ] in his '']'' uses the word ''superstition'' explaining that in ] that belief maintained the cohesion of the ], operating as an '']''.<ref>Guy, Josephine M. (2007) ''The Complete Works of Oscar Wilde'', Oxford University Press, Vol. IV, p. 337, {{ISBN|0191568449}}.</ref>


==Opposition to superstition== ==Opposition to superstition==
{{See also|Magical thinking}}
Opposition to superstition was first recorded in ], where philosophers such as ] and the ] exhibited ] or aversion to religion and myths, and ]{{spnd}}especially his ]{{spnd}} and ] both present their work as parts of a search for truth.
In the ], the existence of gods was actively debated both among philosophers and theologians, and opposition to superstition arose consequently. The poem ''{{lang|la|]}}'', written by the Roman poet and philosopher ] further developed the opposition to superstition. ]'s work ''{{lang|la|]}}'' also had a great influence on the development of the modern concept of superstition as well as the word itself. Where ] distinguished ''{{lang|la|superstitio}}'' and ''{{lang|la|religio}}'', ] used only the word ''{{lang|la|religio}}''. ], for whom ''{{lang|la|superstitio}}'' meant "excessive fear of the gods" wrote that "''{{lang|la|superstitio, non religio, tollenda est}}'' ", which means that only superstition, and not religion, should be abolished. The ] also made laws condemning those who excited excessive religious fear in others.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.giornopaganomemoria.it/superstitio.html|title=Uso della parola superstitio contro i pagani|website=www.giornopaganomemoria.it|access-date=3 August 2015|archive-date=19 November 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151119124403/http://www.giornopaganomemoria.it/superstitio.html|url-status=live}}</ref>


During the Middle Ages, the idea of God's influence on the world's events went mostly undisputed. ] were quite frequent, even though ] (1194{{spnd}}1250{{nbsp}}{{abbr|AD|anno domini}}) was the first king who explicitly outlawed trials by ordeal as they were considered "irrational".<ref>{{cite web |title=Ma l'imperatore svevo fu conservatore o innovatore? |url=http://www.stupormundi.it/Houben1.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150429053347/http://www.stupormundi.it/Houben1.htm |archive-date=29 April 2015 }}</ref>
In the ], the existence of gods was actively debated both among philosophers and theologians, and opposition to superstition arose consequently. The poem ''{{lang|la|]}}'', written by the Roman poet and philosopher ] further developed the opposition to superstition. ]’s work ''{{lang|la|]}}'' also had a great influence on the development of the modern concept of superstition as well as the word itself. Where ] distinguished ''{{lang|la|superstitio}}'' and ''{{lang|la|religio}}'', ] used only the term ''{{lang|la|religio}}''. ], for whom ''{{lang|la|superstitio}}'' meant “excessive fear of the gods” wrote that “''{{lang|la|superstitio, non religio, tollenda est}}'' ”, which means that only superstition, and not religion, should be abolished.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.filosofico.net/lucrezioo.htm |title=Il IV libro del "De rerum natura"}}</ref> The ] also made laws condemning those who excited excessive religious fear in others.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.giornopaganomemoria.it/superstitio.html |title=Uso della parola superstitio contro i pagani}}</ref>


The rediscovery of lost classical works (]) and scientific advancement led to a steadily increasing disbelief in superstition. A new, more ] lens was beginning to see use in exegesis. Opposition to superstition was central to the ]. The first philosopher who dared to criticize superstition publicly and in a written form was ], who was a key figure in the Age of Enlightenment.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Wilson |first1=Helen Judy |last2=Reill |first2=Peter Hanns |title=Encyclopedia of the Enlightenment |url=https://archive.org/details/encyclopediaenli00reil |url-access=limited |publisher=Facts on File |location=New York |isbn=978-0-8160-5335-3 |page= |quote=.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;equating all Christian beliefs except those accessible to unaided reason with superstition&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.|year=2004 }}</ref>
During the Middle Ages, the idea of God’s influence on the world’s events went mostly undisputed. ] were quite frequent, even though ] (1194{{spnd}}1250{{nbsp}}{{abbr|AD|anno domini}}) was the first king who explicitly outlawed trials by ordeal as they were considered “irrational”.<ref>{{cite web |title=Ma l'imperatore svevo fu conservatore o innovatore? |url=http://www.stupormundi.it/Houben1.htm}}</ref>


== Regional and national superstitions ==
The rediscovery of lost classical works (]) and scientific advancement led to a steadily increasing disbelief in superstition. A new, more ] lens was beginning to see use in exegesis. Opposition to superstition was central to the ].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Wilson |first1=Helen Judy |last2=Reill |first2=Peter Hanns |title=Encyclopedia of the Enlightenment |publisher=Facts on File |location=New York |isbn=0-8160-5335-9 |page=577 |quote=.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;equating all Christian beliefs except those accessible to unaided reason with superstition&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.}}</ref>
Most superstitions arose over the course of centuries and are rooted in regional and historical circumstances, such as religious beliefs or the natural environment. For instance, ]s are believed to be of medicinal value in many Asian countries, including China.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Wagner|first1=P.|last2=Dittmann|first2=A.|date=2014|title=Medicinal use of Gekko gecko (Squamata: Gekkonidae) has an impact on agamid lizards.|url=http://salamandra-journal.com/index.php/home/contents/2014-vol-50/wagner-p-a-dittmann|journal=Salamandra|volume=50|pages=185–186|access-date=30 January 2020|archive-date=30 January 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200130003413/http://salamandra-journal.com/index.php/home/contents/2014-vol-50/wagner-p-a-dittmann|url-status=live}}</ref>

In China, ] is a belief system that different places have negative effects, e.g. that a room in the northwest corner of a house is "very bad".<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|url=https://skepticalinquirer.org/exclusive/superstition-and-the-chinese-real-estate-market/|title=Superstition and the Chinese Real Estate Market {{!}} Skeptical Inquirer|last=Nicaise|first=Alexander|date=16 January 2020|language=en-US|access-date=29 January 2020|archive-date=27 January 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200127161529/https://skepticalinquirer.org/exclusive/superstition-and-the-chinese-real-estate-market/|url-status=live}}</ref> Similarly, the number 8 is a "]" in ], so that it is more common than any other number in the Chinese housing market.<ref name=":1" />

=== Animals ===
There are many different animals around the world that have been tied to superstitions. People in the West are familiar with the omen of a black cat crossing one's path. Locomotive engineers believe a hare crossing one's path is bad luck.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Cowan |first=James |date=1 September 1928 |title=The Romance of the Rail |journal=The New Zealand Railways Magazine |volume=3 |issue=5 |pages=36 |via=Victoria University of Wellington}}</ref> According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) the ] (''Myrmecophaga tridactyla'') is targeted by motorists in regions of Brazil who do not want the creature to cross in front of them and give them bad luck.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The animals harmed by superstition {{!}} BBC Earth |url=https://www.bbcearth.com/news/the-animals-harmed-by-superstition |access-date=28 July 2022 |website=www.bbcearth.com |language=en |archive-date=28 July 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220728043210/https://www.bbcearth.com/news/the-animals-harmed-by-superstition |url-status=live }}</ref>

=== Numbers ===
Certain numbers hold significance for particular cultures and communities. It is common for buildings to omit certain floors on their elevator panels and there are specific terms for people with severe aversions to specific numbers.<ref>{{Cite web |title=No more skipping 4, 13, 14, 24 in Vancouver floor numbers |url=https://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/no-more-skipping-4-13-14-24-in-vancouver-floor-numbers |access-date=28 July 2022 |website=vancouversun |language=en-CA |archive-date=12 November 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112042029/https://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/no-more-skipping-4-13-14-24-in-vancouver-floor-numbers |url-status=live }}</ref> ], for example, is the fear of the number 13.<ref>{{Cite web |date=14 September 2013 |title=Superstitious Numbers Around the World |url=https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/article/130913-friday-luck-lucky-superstition-13 |access-date=28 July 2022 |website=Culture |language=en |archive-date=30 June 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220630050705/https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/article/130913-friday-luck-lucky-superstition-13 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Similarly, a common practice in East Asian nations is avoiding instances of the digit 4. It represents or can be translated as death or die. This is known as ] ({{ety|grc|''τετράς'' (tetrás)|four|grc|''φόβος'' (phóbos)|fear}}). A widespread superstition is fear of the number 666, given as the ] in the biblical ]. This fear is called hexakosioihexekontahexaphobia.

=== Objects ===
There are many objects tied to superstitions. During the Great Depression, it was common for people to carry a rabbit's foot around with them.<ref name=":4">{{Cite web |author1=Natalie Wolchover |date=19 September 2011 |title=The Surprising Origins of 9 Common Superstitions |url=https://www.livescience.com/33507-origins-of-superstitions.html |access-date=28 July 2022 |website=livescience.com |language=en |archive-date=27 November 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201127014317/https://www.livescience.com/33507-origins-of-superstitions.html |url-status=live }}</ref> During the ], people in parts of Indonesia made ''tetek melek,'' a traditional homemade mask made of coconut palm fronds, which was hung in doorways to keep occupants safe.{{citation needed|date=March 2023}}

According to superstitions, breaking a ] is said to bring seven years of ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mirrorhistory.com/mirror-facts/broken-mirror/|title=Breaking a mirror – meaning of broken mirror|work=Mirror History|access-date=12 April 2017|archive-date=13 April 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170413072419/http://www.mirrorhistory.com/mirror-facts/broken-mirror/|url-status=live}}</ref> From ancient Rome to Northern India, mirrors have been handled with care, or sometimes avoided all together.<ref name=":4" />

Horseshoes have long been considered lucky. Opinion is divided as to which way up the horseshoe ought to be nailed. Some say the ends should point up, so that the horseshoe catches the luck, and that the ends pointing down allow the good luck to be lost; others say they should point down, so that the luck is poured upon those entering the home.
Superstitious sailors believe that nailing a horseshoe to the mast will help their vessel avoid storms.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.indepthinfo.com/horseshoes/luck.htm |title=Luck and Horseshoes |publisher=Indepthinfo.com |access-date=19 December 2011 |archive-date=29 October 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191029135942/http://www.indepthinfo.com/horseshoes/luck.htm |url-status=dead }}</ref>

In China, yarrow and tortoiseshell are considered lucky and brooms have a number of superstitions attached to them. It is considered bad luck to use a broom within three days of the new year as this will sweep away good luck.<ref name="us.mofcom.gov.cn">{{Cite web |title=Chinese customs, superstitions and traditions |url=http://us.mofcom.gov.cn/article/aboutchina/202011/20201103012645.shtml#:~:text=Other%20customs%20and%20superstitions%20include,and%201pm%20quarrels%20will%20ensue. |access-date=28 July 2022 |website=us.mofcom.gov.cn |archive-date=28 July 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220728043211/http://us.mofcom.gov.cn/article/aboutchina/202011/20201103012645.shtml#:~:text=Other%20customs%20and%20superstitions%20include,and%201pm%20quarrels%20will%20ensue. |url-status=live }}</ref>

=== Actions ===
Common actions in the West include not walking under a ladder, touching wood, throwing salt over one's shoulder, or not opening an umbrella inside. In China wearing certain colours is believed to bring luck.<ref name="us.mofcom.gov.cn"/>

"Break a leg" is a typical English ] used in the context of ] or other ] to wish a performer "]". An ironic or non-literal saying of uncertain origin (a ]), "break a leg" is commonly said to ]s and ]s before they go on stage to perform or before an ]. In English (though it may originate in German), the expression was likely first used in this context in the United States in the 1930s or possibly 1920s,<ref name="WWWords">{{Cite web |url=http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-bre1.htm |title=Break a Leg |publisher=World Wide Words |access-date=24 April 2007 |archive-date=3 April 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070403165551/http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-bre1.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> originally documented without specifically theatrical associations. Among ], the traditional saying is not "break a leg", but the French word "'']''".<ref name=McConnell1977>{{cite book |last1=McConnell |first1=Joan |last2=McConnell |first2=Teena |title=Ballet as body language |url=https://archive.org/details/balletasbodylang00mcco_0 |url-access=registration |publisher=Harper & Row |year=1977 |isbn=0-06-012964-6}}</ref>

Some superstitious actions have practical origins. Opening an umbrella inside in eighteenth-century London was a physical hazard, as umbrellas then were metal-spoked, clumsy spring mechanisms and a "veritable hazard to open indoors."<ref>{{Cite book |last=Panati |first=Charles |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/20521056 |title=Panati's extraordinary origins of everyday things |date=1989 |isbn=0-06-096419-7 |location=New York |oclc=20521056}}</ref>

Another superstition with practical origins is the action of blowing briefly left and right before crossing rail tracks for safe travels as the person engaging in the action looks both ways.<ref>{{Cite web |title=TrackSAFE – A rail safety superstition |url=https://www.tracksafe.co.nz/safety/campaigns/a-rail-safety-superstition |access-date=28 July 2022 |website=tracksafe.co.nz |archive-date=18 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230118041801/https://www.tracksafe.co.nz/safety/campaigns/a-rail-safety-superstition |url-status=live }}</ref>


==See also== ==See also==
{{Div col}}
* ]
* {{annotated link|Superstition in Britain}}
* {{annotated link|Anthropology}}
* {{annotated link|Curse}}
* {{annotated link|Elite religion}}
* {{annotated link|Exorcism}}
* {{annotated link|Faith}}
* {{annotated link|Fatalism}}
* {{annotated link|Folklore}}
* {{annotated link|God of the gaps}}
* {{annotated link|Heritage science}}
* {{annotated link|Heritage studies}}
* {{annotated link|James Randi}}
* {{annotated link|Kuai Kuai culture}}
* {{annotated link|Lived religion}}
* {{annotated link|Magical thinking}}
* {{annotated link|Occult}}
* {{annotated link|Paranormal}}
* {{annotated link|Precognition}}
* {{annotated link|Pseudoscience}}
* {{annotated link|Relationship between religion and science}}
* {{annotated link|Sacred mysteries}}
* {{annotated link|Synchronicity}}
* {{annotated link|Tradition}}
* {{annotated link|Urban legend}}
{{div col end}}

== Bibliography ==
* Ibodullayeva Maftuna Habibullayevna. "Superstitious Beliefs Across Cultures: A View From Linguaculturalogy". ''Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal'', vol. 10, no. 1, Jan. 2022, pp.&nbsp;61–65, <nowiki>https://www.giirj.com/index.php/giirj/article/view/959</nowiki>.


==References== ==References==
{{Reflist|30em}} {{Reflist|30em}}

== Further reading ==
* {{cite journal|doi=10.1007/s11089-023-01057-z |title=A Comparison of Superstitious Beliefs and Rituals in Buddhism and Islam |date=2024 |last1=Khan |first1=Khatib Ahmad |last2=Aigerim |first2=Danabekova |last3=Yansheng |first3=Wu |last4=Ghayyas |first4=Saba |last5=Adil |first5=Adnan |journal=Pastoral Psychology |volume=73 |pages=133–145 }}


==External links== ==External links==
{{wiktionary|superstition}} {{wiktionary|superstition}}
{{Commons category|Superstitions}} {{Commons category|Superstitions}}
{{wikiquote}} {{Wikiquote}}
{{Wikisource}} {{Wikisource}}
* : slideshow by '']'' * {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120102130053/http://www.life.com/gallery/52091/where-superstitions-come-from#index/0 |date=2 January 2012 }}: slideshow by '']''
*


{{Superstitions}} {{Superstitions}}
Line 100: Line 304:


] ]
] ]

Latest revision as of 23:40, 25 December 2024

Belief or behavior that is considered irrational or supernatural For other uses, see Superstition (disambiguation).

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
This article may present fringe theories, without giving appropriate weight to the mainstream view and explaining the responses to the fringe theories. Please help improve it or discuss the issue on the talk page. (October 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This article may need to be rewritten to comply with Misplaced Pages's quality standards. You can help. The talk page may contain suggestions. (October 2023)
(Learn how and when to remove this message)
Part of a series on
Anthropology of religion
Basic concepts
Case studies
Magic
Ritual
Revitalization movements
Related articles
Major theorists
Journals
Religions
Ethnic and folk religions
Buddhism
Christianity
Hinduism
Islam
Judaism
Jainism
Sikhism
Social and cultural anthropology

A superstition is any belief or practice considered by non-practitioners to be irrational or supernatural, attributed to fate or magic, perceived supernatural influence, or fear of that which is unknown. It is commonly applied to beliefs and practices surrounding luck, amulets, astrology, fortune telling, spirits, and certain paranormal entities, particularly the belief that future events can be foretold by specific unrelated prior events.

Part of a series on the
Paranormal
Main articles
Skepticism
Parapsychology
Related

The word superstition is also used to refer to a religion not practiced by the majority of a given society regardless of whether the prevailing religion contains alleged superstitions or to all religions by the antireligious.

Contemporary use

Definitions of the term vary, but they commonly describe superstitions as irrational beliefs at odds with scientific knowledge of the world. Stuart Vyse proposes that a superstition's "presumed mechanism of action is inconsistent with our understanding of the physical world", with Jane Risen adding that these beliefs are not merely scientifically wrong but impossible. Similarly, Lysann Damisch defines superstition as "irrational beliefs that an object, action, or circumstance that is not logically related to a course of events influences its outcome." Dale Martin says they "presuppose an erroneous understanding about cause and effect, that have been rejected by modern science." The Oxford English Dictionary describes them as "irrational, unfounded", Merriam-Webster as "a false conception about causation or belief or practice", and the Cambridge Dictionary as "sans grounding in human reason or scientific knowledge". This notion of superstitious practices is not causally related to the outcomes.

Both Vyse and Martin argue that what is considered superstitious varies across cultures and time. For Vyse, "if a culture has not yet adopted science as its standard, then what we consider magic or superstition is more accurately the local science or religion." Dale points out that superstitions are often considered out of place in modern times and are influenced by modern science and its notions of what is rational or irrational, surviving as remnants of older popular beliefs and practices.

Vyse proposes that in addition to being irrational and culturally dependent, superstitions have to be instrumental; an actual effect is expected by the person holding a belief, such as increased odds of winning a prize. This distinction excludes practices where participants merely expect to be entertained.

Alternative religious beliefs as superstition

See also: folk religion, lived religion, Superstitions in Muslim societies, Evolutionary origin of religions, and Evolutionary psychology of religion

Religious practices that differ from commonly accepted religions in a given culture are sometimes called superstitious; similarly, new practices brought into an established religious community can also be labeled as superstitious in an attempt to exclude them. Also, an excessive display of devoutness has often been labelled as superstitious behavior.

In antiquity, the Latin term superstitio, like its equivalent Greek deisidaimonia, became associated with exaggerated ritual and a credulous attitude towards prophecies. Greek and Roman polytheists, who modeled their relations with the gods on political and social terms, scorned the man who constantly trembled with fear at the thought of the gods, as a slave feared a cruel and capricious master. Such fear of the gods was what the Romans meant by "superstition" (Veyne 1987, p. 211). Cicero (106–43 BCE) contrasted superstitio with the mainstream religion of his day, stating: Nec vero superstitione tollenda religio tollitur – "One does not destroy religion by destroying superstition". Diderot's 18th-century Encyclopédie defines superstition as "any excess of religion in general", and links it specifically with paganism.

In his 1520 Prelude on the Babylonian Captivity of the Church, Martin Luther, who called the papacy "that fountain and source of all superstitions", accuses the popes of superstition:

For there was scarce another of the celebrated bishoprics that had so few learned pontiffs; only in violence, intrigue, and superstition has it hitherto surpassed the rest. For the men who occupied the Roman See a thousand years ago differ so vastly from those who have since come into power, that one is compelled to refuse the name of Roman pontiff either to the former or to the latter.

The current Catechism of the Catholic Church considers superstition sinful in the sense that it denotes "a perverse excess of religion", as a demonstrated lack of trust in divine providence (¶ 2110), and a violation of the first of the Ten Commandments. The Catechism represents a defense against the accusation that Catholic doctrine is superstitious:

Superstition is a deviation of religious feeling and of the practices this feeling imposes. It can even affect the worship we offer the true God, e.g., when one attributes an importance in some way magical to certain practices otherwise lawful or necessary. To attribute the efficacy of prayers or of sacramental signs to their mere external performance, apart from the interior dispositions that they demand is to fall into superstition. Cf. Matthew 23:16–22 (¶ 2111)

Examples of superstitions and taboos from a November 1941 issue of Weird Tales.

Classifications

Dieter Harmening's 1979 book Superstitio categorizes superstitions in three categories: magic, divination and observances. The observances category subdivides into "signs" and "time". The time sub-category constitutes temporal prognostics like observances of various days related like dog days, Egyptian days, year prognosis and lunaries, whereas the signs category constitutes signs such as particular animal behaviors (like the call of birds or the neighing of horses) or the sighting of comets, or dreams. According to László Sándor Chardonnens, the signs subcategory usually needs an observer who might help in interpreting the signs and such observer does not need necessarily to be an active participant in the observation. According to Chardonnens, a participant in the category of divination may need to go beyond mere observation and need to be active participant in a given action. Examples of divination superstitions include judicial astrology, necromancy, haruspex, lot-casting, geomancy, aeromancy and prophecy. Chardonnens says superstitions belonging to the magic category are exceedingly hermetical and ritualistic: examples include witchcraft, potions, incantations, amulets etc. Chardonnens says that the observation category needs an observer, divination category needs a participant to tell what is to be observed, whereas magic requires a participant who must follow a protocol to influence the future, and that these three types of superstition need increasing stages of participation and knowledge.

Chardonnens defines "prognostication" as that component of superstition which expects knowledge of the future on systematic application of given ritual and order, and moves to classify it, writing: "Prognostication seems to occupy a place somewhere between observation and divination, of which the observation of times is represented most frequently due to the primacy of temporal prognostics..

Chardonnens classifies prophecy under the topic of divination; examples including the prophets of the Old Testament, biblical typological allegory, the fifteen signs before Judgement Day, and the many prophecies expressed by saints; Chardonnens further points out that since many aspects of religious experience are tied up with prophecy, the medieval church condones the same. Chardonnens says, one could differentiate between those kinds of prophecy which are (1) inspired by God or Satan and their minions; (2) "gecyndelic"; and (3) "wiglung" examples —lacking divine or infernal inspiration and not "gecyndelic" either. But practically, however, most, if not all, words relating to prophecy ought to be interpreted as inspired.

Criticism of definitions

Identifying something as superstition generally expresses a pejorative view. Items referred to as such in common parlance are commonly referred to as folk belief in folkloristics.

According to László Sándor Chardonnens, Oxford English Dictionary (OED) definitions pass value-judgement and attribution to "fear and ignorance" without doing enough justice to elaborate systems of superstitions. Chardonnens says the religious element in OED denotations is not understood as a system of observance and testifies to a belief in higher power on part of the compiler of the dictionary.

Subjective perceptions

Richard Webster's The Encyclopedia of Superstitions points out that many superstitions have connections with religion, that people may hold individual subjective perceptions vis à vis superstitions against one another (people of one belief are likely to call people of another belief superstitious); Constantine regarded paganism as a superstition; Tacitus on other hand regarded Christianity as a pernicious superstition; Saul of Tarsus and Martin Luther perceived any thing that was not centered on Christ to be superstitious. According to Dale Martin, difference of opinion on what constitutes "superstition" may become apparent when one moves from one culture to another culture.

Etymology

While the formation of the Latin word is clear, from the verb super-stare, "to stand over, stand upon; survive", its original intended sense is less clear. It can be interpreted as "'standing over a thing in amazement or awe", but other possibilities have been suggested, e.g. the sense of excess, i.e. over-scrupulousness or over-ceremoniousness in the performing of religious rites, or else the survival of old, irrational religious habits.

The earliest known use as a noun is found in Plautus, Ennius and later in Pliny the Elder, with the meaning of art of divination. From its use in the Classical Latin of Livy and Ovid, it is used in the pejorative sense that it holds today: of an excessive fear of the gods or unreasonable religious belief; as opposed to religio, the proper, reasonable awe of the gods. Cicero derived the term from superstitiosi, lit. those who are "left over", i.e. "survivors", "descendants", connecting it with excessive anxiety of parents in hoping that their children would survive them to perform their necessary funerary rites.

According to Michael David Bailey, it was with Pliny's usage that magic came close to superstition; and charges of being superstitious were first leveled by Roman authorities on their Christian subjects. In turn, early Christian writers saw all Roman and Pagan cults as superstitious, worshipping false Gods, fallen angels and demons. With Christian usage almost all forms of magic started being described as forms of superstition.

Superstition and psychology

Main articles: Magical thinking, Placebo, and Effective theory

Origins

Behaviorism perspective

In 1948, behavioral psychologist B.F. Skinner published an article in the Journal of Experimental Psychology, in which he described his pigeons exhibiting what appeared to be superstitious behaviour. One pigeon was making turns in its cage, another would swing its head in a pendulum motion, while others also displayed a variety of other behaviours. Because these behaviors were all done ritualistically in an attempt to receive food from a dispenser, even though the dispenser had already been programmed to release food at set time intervals regardless of the pigeons' actions, Skinner believed that the pigeons were trying to influence their feeding schedule by performing these actions. He then extended this as a proposition regarding the nature of superstitious behavior in humans.

Skinner's theory regarding superstition being the nature of the pigeons' behaviour has been challenged by other psychologists such as Staddon and Simmelhag, who theorised an alternative explanation for the pigeons' behaviour.

Despite challenges to Skinner's interpretation of the root of his pigeons' superstitious behaviour, his conception of the reinforcement schedule has been used to explain superstitious behaviour in humans. Originally, in Skinner's animal research, "some pigeons responded up to 10,000 times without reinforcement when they had originally been conditioned on an intermittent reinforcement basis." Compared to the other reinforcement schedules (e.g., fixed ratio, fixed interval), these behaviours were also the most resistant to extinction. This is called the partial reinforcement effect, and this has been used to explain superstitious behaviour in humans. To be more precise, this effect means that, whenever an individual performs an action expecting a reinforcement, and none seems forthcoming, it actually creates a sense of persistence within the individual.

Evolutionary/cognitive perspective

From a simpler perspective, natural selection will tend to reinforce a tendency to generate weak associations or heuristics that are overgeneralized. If there is a strong survival advantage to making correct associations, then this will outweigh the negatives of making many incorrect, "superstitious" associations. It has also been argued that there may be connections between OCD and superstition. It is stated that superstition is at the end of the day long-held beliefs that are rooted in coincidence and/or cultural tradition rather than logic and facts.

OCD that involves superstition is often referred to as "Magical Thinking" People with this kind of manifestation of OCD believe that if they do not follow through with a certain compulsion, then something bad will happen to either themselves or others. Superstitious OCD, while can appear in anyone with OCD, more often appears in people with a religious background or with people who grew up in a culture that believes in magic and perform rituals. Like stated before in the article above, superstition and prophecies are sometimes linked together. People with religious or superstitious OCD may have compulsions and perform rituals or behaviors in order to fulfill or get closer to fulfilling a prophecy. Those with "magical thinking" OCD may realize that doing an action will not actually 'save' someone, but the fear that if they do not perform a certain behavior someone could get hurt is so overwhelming that they do it just to be sure. People with superstitious OCD will go out of their way to avoid something deemed 'unlucky'. Such as the 13th floor of a building, the 13th room, certain numbers or colors, because if they do not they believe something horrible may happen. Though superstitious OCD may work in reverse where one will always wear a certain item of clothing or jewelry or carry a certain item like a bag because it brings them 'luck' and allow good things to happen.

A recent theory by Jane Risen proposes that superstitions are intuitions that people acknowledge to be wrong, but acquiesce to rather than correct when they arise as the intuitive assessment of a situation. Her theory draws on dual-process models of reasoning. In this view, superstitions are the output of "System 1" reasoning that are not corrected even when caught by "System 2".

Mechanisms

People seem to believe that superstitions influence events by changing the likelihood of currently possible outcomes rather than by creating new possible outcomes. In sporting events, for example, a lucky ritual or object is thought to increase the chance that an athlete will perform at the peak of their ability, rather than increasing their overall ability at that sport.

Psychologist Stuart Vyse has pointed out that until about 2010, "ost researchers assumed superstitions were irrational and focused their attentions on discovering why people were superstitious." Vyse went on to describe studies that looked at the relationship between performance and superstitious rituals. Preliminary work has indicated that such rituals can reduce stress and thereby improve performance, but, Vyse has said, "...not because they are superstitious but because they are rituals.... So there is no real magic, but there is a bit of calming magic in performing a ritualistic sequence before attempting a high-pressure activity.... Any old ritual will do."

Occurrence

People tend to attribute events to supernatural causes (in psychological terms, "external causes") most often under two circumstances.

  1. People are more likely to attribute an event to a superstitious cause if it is unlikely than if it is likely. In other words, the more surprising the event, the more likely it is to evoke a supernatural explanation. This is believed to stem from an effectance motivation – a basic desire to exert control over one's environment. When no natural cause can explain a situation, attributing an event to a superstitious cause may give people some sense of control and ability to predict what will happen in their environment.
  2. People are more likely to attribute an event to a superstitious cause if it is negative than positive. This is called negative agency bias. Boston Red Sox fans, for instance, attributed the failure of their team to win the world series for 86 years to the curse of the Bambino: a curse placed on the team for trading Babe Ruth to the New York Yankees so that the team owner could fund a Broadway musical. When the Red Sox finally won the world series in 2004, however, the team's success was attributed to the team's skill and the rebuilding effort of the new owner and general manager. More commonly, people are more likely to perceive their computer to act according to its own intentions when it malfunctions than functions properly.

Consumer behavior

According to consumer behavior analytics of John C. Mowen et al., superstitions are employed as a heuristic tool hence those influence a variety of consumer behaviors. John C. Mowen et al. says, after taking into account for a set of antecedents, trait superstitions are predictive of a wide variety of consumer beliefs, like beliefs in astrology or in common negative superstitions (e.g., fear of black cats). A general proneness to be superstitious leads to enduring temperament to gamble, participation in promotional games, investments in stocks, forwarding of superstitious e‐mails, keeping good‐luck charms, and exhibit sport fanship etc. Additionally it has been estimated that between $700 million and $800 million are lost every Friday the 13th because of people's refusal to travel, purchase major items or conduct business.

Superstition and politics

Ancient Greek historian Polybius in his Histories uses the word superstition explaining that in ancient Rome that belief maintained the cohesion of the empire, operating as an instrumentum regni.

Opposition to superstition

See also: Magical thinking

In the classical era, the existence of gods was actively debated both among philosophers and theologians, and opposition to superstition arose consequently. The poem De rerum natura, written by the Roman poet and philosopher Lucretius further developed the opposition to superstition. Cicero's work De natura deorum also had a great influence on the development of the modern concept of superstition as well as the word itself. Where Cicero distinguished superstitio and religio, Lucretius used only the word religio. Cicero, for whom superstitio meant "excessive fear of the gods" wrote that "superstitio, non religio, tollenda est ", which means that only superstition, and not religion, should be abolished. The Roman Empire also made laws condemning those who excited excessive religious fear in others.

During the Middle Ages, the idea of God's influence on the world's events went mostly undisputed. Trials by ordeal were quite frequent, even though Frederick II (1194 – 1250 AD) was the first king who explicitly outlawed trials by ordeal as they were considered "irrational".

The rediscovery of lost classical works (The Renaissance) and scientific advancement led to a steadily increasing disbelief in superstition. A new, more rationalistic lens was beginning to see use in exegesis. Opposition to superstition was central to the Age of Enlightenment. The first philosopher who dared to criticize superstition publicly and in a written form was Baruch Spinoza, who was a key figure in the Age of Enlightenment.

Regional and national superstitions

Most superstitions arose over the course of centuries and are rooted in regional and historical circumstances, such as religious beliefs or the natural environment. For instance, geckos are believed to be of medicinal value in many Asian countries, including China.

In China, Feng shui is a belief system that different places have negative effects, e.g. that a room in the northwest corner of a house is "very bad". Similarly, the number 8 is a "lucky number" in China, so that it is more common than any other number in the Chinese housing market.

Animals

There are many different animals around the world that have been tied to superstitions. People in the West are familiar with the omen of a black cat crossing one's path. Locomotive engineers believe a hare crossing one's path is bad luck. According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) the giant anteater (Myrmecophaga tridactyla) is targeted by motorists in regions of Brazil who do not want the creature to cross in front of them and give them bad luck.

Numbers

Certain numbers hold significance for particular cultures and communities. It is common for buildings to omit certain floors on their elevator panels and there are specific terms for people with severe aversions to specific numbers. Triskaidekaphobia, for example, is the fear of the number 13. Similarly, a common practice in East Asian nations is avoiding instances of the digit 4. It represents or can be translated as death or die. This is known as tetraphobia (from Ancient Greek τετράς (tetrás) 'four' and Ancient Greek φόβος (phóbos) 'fear'). A widespread superstition is fear of the number 666, given as the number of the beast in the biblical Book of Revelation. This fear is called hexakosioihexekontahexaphobia.

Objects

There are many objects tied to superstitions. During the Great Depression, it was common for people to carry a rabbit's foot around with them. During the Coronavirus epidemic, people in parts of Indonesia made tetek melek, a traditional homemade mask made of coconut palm fronds, which was hung in doorways to keep occupants safe.

According to superstitions, breaking a mirror is said to bring seven years of bad luck. From ancient Rome to Northern India, mirrors have been handled with care, or sometimes avoided all together.

Horseshoes have long been considered lucky. Opinion is divided as to which way up the horseshoe ought to be nailed. Some say the ends should point up, so that the horseshoe catches the luck, and that the ends pointing down allow the good luck to be lost; others say they should point down, so that the luck is poured upon those entering the home. Superstitious sailors believe that nailing a horseshoe to the mast will help their vessel avoid storms.

In China, yarrow and tortoiseshell are considered lucky and brooms have a number of superstitions attached to them. It is considered bad luck to use a broom within three days of the new year as this will sweep away good luck.

Actions

Common actions in the West include not walking under a ladder, touching wood, throwing salt over one's shoulder, or not opening an umbrella inside. In China wearing certain colours is believed to bring luck.

"Break a leg" is a typical English idiom used in the context of theatre or other performing arts to wish a performer "good luck". An ironic or non-literal saying of uncertain origin (a dead metaphor), "break a leg" is commonly said to actors and musicians before they go on stage to perform or before an audition. In English (though it may originate in German), the expression was likely first used in this context in the United States in the 1930s or possibly 1920s, originally documented without specifically theatrical associations. Among professional dancers, the traditional saying is not "break a leg", but the French word "merde".

Some superstitious actions have practical origins. Opening an umbrella inside in eighteenth-century London was a physical hazard, as umbrellas then were metal-spoked, clumsy spring mechanisms and a "veritable hazard to open indoors."

Another superstition with practical origins is the action of blowing briefly left and right before crossing rail tracks for safe travels as the person engaging in the action looks both ways.

See also

Bibliography

  • Ibodullayeva Maftuna Habibullayevna. "Superstitious Beliefs Across Cultures: A View From Linguaculturalogy". Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, vol. 10, no. 1, Jan. 2022, pp. 61–65, https://www.giirj.com/index.php/giirj/article/view/959.

References

  1. ^ Vyse, Stuart A. (2000). Believing in Magic: The Psychology of Superstition. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 19–22. ISBN 978-0-1951-3634-0.
  2. ^ Chardonnens, L. S. (2007). Chapter Four. Superstition and prognostication. Brill. ISBN 978-90-474-2042-2. Archived from the original on 18 January 2021. Retrieved 28 December 2020.
  3. ^ Vyse, Stuart (2020). Superstition: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0198819257.
  4. ^ Risen, Jane L. (2016). "Believing what we do not believe: Acquiescence to superstitious beliefs and other powerful intuitions". Psychological Review. 123 (2): 182–207. doi:10.1037/rev0000017. PMID 26479707. S2CID 14384232.
  5. Damisch, Lysann; Stoberock, Barbara; Mussweiler, Thomas (1 July 2010). "Keep Your Fingers Crossed!: How Superstition Improves Performance". Psychological Science. 21 (7): 1014–1020. doi:10.1177/0956797610372631. ISSN 0956-7976. PMID 20511389. S2CID 8862493.
  6. Tosyali, Furkan; Aktas, Busra (1 December 2021). "Does training analytical thinking decrease superstitious beliefs? Relationship between analytical thinking, intrinsic religiosity, and superstitious beliefs". Personality and Individual Differences. 183: 111122. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.111122. ISSN 0191-8869. S2CID 237658088.
  7. Martin, Dale B. (2009). Inventing Superstition. Harvard University Press. pp. 10–20. ISBN 978-0-674-04069-4.
  8. ^ "superstition, n." OED Online. Oxford University Press. September 2021. Retrieved 28 November 2021.
  9. ^ "Definition of SUPERSTITION". www.merriam-webster.com. Archived from the original on 7 October 2008. Retrieved 30 December 2020.
  10. "Superstition meaning in the Cambridge English Dictionary". dictionary.cambridge.org. Archived from the original on 8 November 2018. Retrieved 30 December 2020.
  11. ^ Carlson, Brad D.; Mowen, John C.; Fang, Xiang (2009). "Trait superstition and consumer behavior: Re-conceptualization, measurement, and initial investigations". Psychology & Marketing. 26 (8): 691 of 689–713. doi:10.1002/mar.20295. ISSN 1520-6793. Archived from the original on 18 January 2021. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
  12. "Superstition". dictionary.cambridge.org. Archived from the original on 8 November 2018. Retrieved 30 December 2020.
  13. Selberg, Torunn (December 2003). "Taking Superstitions Seriously" (PDF). Folklore. 114 (3): 297–306. doi:10.1080/0015587032000145342. JSTOR 30035120. S2CID 145299302.
  14. Scheid, John (2016). "Superstitio". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Classics. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.013.6150. ISBN 978-0-19-938113-5. Archived from the original on 1 July 2022. Retrieved 1 July 2022.
  15. De Divinatione, Book 2, chapter 72, section 148.
  16. Louis, Chevalier de Jaucourt (Biography) (10 October 2010). "Superstition". Encyclopedia of Diderot & d'Alembert – Collaborative Translation Project. Archived from the original on 19 November 2015. Retrieved 1 April 2015.
  17. Luther, Martin (1915). "The Babylonian Captivity § The Sacrament of Extreme Unction". In Jacobs, Henry Eyster; Spaeth, Adolph (eds.). Works of Martin Luther: With Instructions and Notes. Vol. 2. Translated by Steinhaeuser, Albert T. W. Philadelphia: A. J. Holman Company. p. 291. ISBN 9780722221235. LCCN 15007839. OCLC 300541097. For there was scarce another of the celebrated bishoprics that had so few learned pontiffs; only in violence, intrigue, and superstition has it hitherto surpassed the rest. For the men who occupied the Roman See a thousand years ago differ so vastly from those who have since come into power, that one is compelled to refuse the name of Roman pontiff either to the former or to the latter.
  18. Harmening, Dieter (1979). Superstitio: Überlieferungs- und theoriegeschichtliche Untersuchungen zur kirchlich-theologischen Aberglaubensliteratur des Mittelalters (in German). Vol. 1. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag GmbH & Co KG. ISBN 9783503012916.
  19. Compare: Chardonnens, László Sándor (2007). "Superstition and Prognostication". Anglo-Saxon Prognostics, 900–1100: Study and Texts. Volume 153 of Brill's studies in intellectual history: Brill's Texts and Sources in Intellectual History, volume 3. Leiden: Brill. p. 105. ISBN 9789004158290. Retrieved 29 September 2024. the observation of signs and times simply entails observibng properly and interpreting the results. This branch of superstition requires an observer who interprets the findings, but this observer need not participate in any activity to disclose that which is to be observed.
  20. Chardonnens, László Sándor (2007). "Superstition and Prognostication". Anglo-Saxon Prognostics, 900–1100: Study and Texts. Volume 153 of Brill's studies in intellectual history: Brill's Texts and Sources in Intellectual History, volume 3. Leiden: Brill. p. 103. ISBN 9789004158290. Retrieved 29 September 2024. medieval prognosticatory superstition, which I describe as a aystem which, if properly applied, yields knowledge of the future. This working definition asserts that prognostication is a component of superstition. Moreover, the working definition makes clear that prognostication is systematic, not random, and that it relies on ritual and order.
  21. Chardonnens, László Sándor (2007). "Superstition and Prognostication". Anglo-Saxon Prognostics, 900–1100: Study and Texts. Volume 153 of Brill's studies in intellectual history: Brill's Texts and Sources in Intellectual History, volume 3. Leiden: Brill. p. 107. ISBN 9789004158290. Retrieved 29 September 2024. Prognostication seems to occupy a place somewhere between observation and divination, of which the observation of times is represented most frequently due to the primacy of temporal prognostics.
  22. Chardonnens, László Sándor (2007). "Superstition and Prognostication". Anglo-Saxon Prognostics, 900–1100: Study and Texts. Volume 153 of Brill's studies in intellectual history: Brill's Texts and Sources in Intellectual History, volume 3. Leiden: Brill. p. 105. ISBN 9789004158290. Retrieved 29 September 2024. The group of observation of times contains all temporal prognostics, which make up the larger part of the English prognostic corpus.
  23. Chardonnens, László Sándor (2007). "Superstition and Prognostication". Anglo-Saxon Prognostics, 900–1100: Study and Texts. Volume 153 of Brill's studies in intellectual history: Brill's Texts and Sources in Intellectual History, volume 3. Leiden: Brill. p. 108. ISBN 9789004158290. Retrieved 29 September 2024. Prophecy is a type of divination which is condoned by the church, since many aspects of the religious experience are tied up with prophecy. Examples include the prophets of the Old Testament, biblical typological allegory, the fifteen signs before Judgement Day, and the many prophecies uttered by saints.
  24. For discussion, see for example Georges, Robert A. & Jones, Michael Owen. 1995. Folkloristics: An Introduction, p. 122. Indiana University Press. ISBN 0253329345.
  25. Webster, Richard (2012). The Encyclopedia of Superstitions. Woodbury, Minnesota: Llewellyn Worldwide. p. xi. ISBN 978-0-7387-2561-1. There are many superstitions connected with religion, and people who belong to one faith are likely to consider people with different beliefs superstitious. Constantine considered paganism a superstition. Tacitus, on the other hand, considered Christianity a pernicious superstition. Martin Luther said that anything that does not center on Christ was superstition. St. Paul also believed this .
  26. Martin, Dale Basil (1 July 2009). "Problems of Definition". Inventing Superstition: From the Hippocratics to the Christians. Harvard University Press. p. 11. ISBN 9780674040694. Retrieved 29 September 2024. Disagreements about what counts as 'superstition' will usually be exacerbated when we move from one culture to another.
  27. "orig. a standing still over or by a thing; hence, amazement, wonder, dread, esp. of the divine or supernatural." Charlton T. Lewis, Charles Short, A Latin Dictionary Archived 8 August 2020 at the Wayback Machine.
  28. Oxford Latin Dictionary. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. 1982.
  29. Turcan, Robert (1996). The Cults of the Roman Empire. Nevill, Antonia (trans.). Oxford, England: Blackwell. pp. 10–12. ISBN 978-0-631-20047-5.. Oxford English Dictionary (Second ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. 1989. The etymological meaning of L. superstitio is perhaps 'standing over a thing in amazement or awe.' Other interpretations of the literal meaning have been proposed, e.g., 'excess in devotion, over-scrupulousness or over-ceremoniousness in religion' and 'the survival of old religious habits in the midst of a new order of things'; but such ideas are foreign to ancient Roman thought.
  30. Manuela Simeoni (4 September 2011). "Uso della parola superstitio contro i pagani" (in Italian). Archived from the original on 19 November 2015. Retrieved 3 August 2015.
  31. Cicero, De Natura Deorum II, 28 (32), quoted in Wagenvoort, Hendrik (1980). Pietas: selected studies in Roman religion. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill. p. 236. ISBN 978-90-04-06195-8.
  32. Bailey, Michael David, 1971– (2007). Magic and superstition in Europe : a concise history from antiquity to the present. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Pub. ISBN 978-0-7425-3386-8. OCLC 70267160.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  33. Skinner, B. F. (1948). "'Superstition' in the Pigeon". Journal of Experimental Psychology. 38 (2): 168–172. doi:10.1037/h0055873. PMID 18913665. S2CID 22577459. Archived from the original on 21 November 2019. Retrieved 27 August 2007.
  34. Staddon, J. E. & Simmelhag, V. L. (1971). "The 'supersitition' experiment: A reexamination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behaviour". Psychological Review. 78 (1): 3–43. doi:10.1037/h0030305.
  35. ^ Schultz & Schultz (2004, 238).
  36. Carver, Charles S. & Scheier, Michael (2004). Perspectives on personality. Allyn and Bacon. p. 332. ISBN 978-0-205-37576-9.
  37. Foster, Kevin R.; Kokko, Hanna (2009). "The evolution of superstitious and superstition-like behaviour". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 276 (1654): 31–7. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0981. PMC 2615824. PMID 18782752.
  38. de Silva, Padmal and Rachman, Stanley (2004) Obsessive-compulsive Disorder, Oxford University Press, p. 34, ISBN 0198520824.
  39. University, Manchester Metropolitan. "Story, Manchester Metropolitan University". Manchester Metropolitan University. Retrieved 17 October 2023.
  40. ^ "Magical Thinking OCD: Excessive Superstition". 20 January 2024. Retrieved 2 July 2024.
  41. "Excessive Superstition In Cases Of OCD – Beyond OCD". Archived from the original on 24 February 2024. Retrieved 2 July 2024.
  42. Baker, Derek. "My Battle with Religious OCD". www.churchofjesuschrist.org. Retrieved 2 July 2024.
  43. Mocan, Naci H.; Yu, Han (August 2017), Can Superstition Create a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy? School Outcomes of Dragon Children of China (Working Paper), Working Paper Series, doi:10.3386/w23709, retrieved 2 July 2024
  44. Hamerman, Eric J.; Morewedge, Carey K. (1 March 2015). "Reliance on Luck Identifying Which Achievement Goals Elicit Superstitious Behavior". Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 41 (3): 323–335. doi:10.1177/0146167214565055. ISSN 0146-1672. PMID 25617118. S2CID 1160061.
  45. Vyse, Stuart (2018). "Do Superstitious Rituals Work?". Skeptical Inquirer. 42 (2): 32–34. Archived from the original on 3 June 2018. Retrieved 3 June 2018.
  46. Vyse, Stuart (April 2020). "Obsessions and compulsions: Do superstitious rituals help cope with anxiety?". Skeptical Inquirer. 44 (2): 52.
  47. ^ Waytz, Adam; Morewedge, Carey K.; Epley, Nicholas; Monteleone, George; Gao, Jia-Hong; Cacioppo, John T. (2010). "Making sense by making sentient: Effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 99 (3): 410–435. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.206.2736. doi:10.1037/a0020240. PMID 20649365.
  48. Morewedge, Carey K. (2009). "Negativity bias in attribution of external agency". Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 138 (4): 535–545. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.212.2333. doi:10.1037/a0016796. PMID 19883135.
  49. ^ Carlson, Brad D.; Mowen, John C.; Fang, Xiang (2009). "Trait superstition and consumer behavior: Re-conceptualization, measurement, and initial investigations". Psychology & Marketing. 26 (8): 689–713. doi:10.1002/mar.20295. ISSN 1520-6793. Archived from the original on 18 January 2021. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
  50. CNBC (13 August 2010). "Friday the 13th Means Millions in Lost Business, Productivity". CNBC. Archived from the original on 2 June 2023. Retrieved 2 June 2023.
  51. Guy, Josephine M. (2007) The Complete Works of Oscar Wilde, Oxford University Press, Vol. IV, p. 337, ISBN 0191568449.
  52. "Uso della parola superstitio contro i pagani". www.giornopaganomemoria.it. Archived from the original on 19 November 2015. Retrieved 3 August 2015.
  53. "Ma l'imperatore svevo fu conservatore o innovatore?". Archived from the original on 29 April 2015.
  54. Wilson, Helen Judy; Reill, Peter Hanns (2004). Encyclopedia of the Enlightenment. New York: Facts on File. p. 577. ISBN 978-0-8160-5335-3. . . . equating all Christian beliefs except those accessible to unaided reason with superstition . . .
  55. Wagner, P.; Dittmann, A. (2014). "Medicinal use of Gekko gecko (Squamata: Gekkonidae) has an impact on agamid lizards". Salamandra. 50: 185–186. Archived from the original on 30 January 2020. Retrieved 30 January 2020.
  56. ^ Nicaise, Alexander (16 January 2020). "Superstition and the Chinese Real Estate Market | Skeptical Inquirer". Archived from the original on 27 January 2020. Retrieved 29 January 2020.
  57. Cowan, James (1 September 1928). "The Romance of the Rail". The New Zealand Railways Magazine. 3 (5): 36 – via Victoria University of Wellington.
  58. "The animals harmed by superstition | BBC Earth". www.bbcearth.com. Archived from the original on 28 July 2022. Retrieved 28 July 2022.
  59. "No more skipping 4, 13, 14, 24 in Vancouver floor numbers". vancouversun. Archived from the original on 12 November 2020. Retrieved 28 July 2022.
  60. "Superstitious Numbers Around the World". Culture. 14 September 2013. Archived from the original on 30 June 2022. Retrieved 28 July 2022.
  61. ^ Natalie Wolchover (19 September 2011). "The Surprising Origins of 9 Common Superstitions". livescience.com. Archived from the original on 27 November 2020. Retrieved 28 July 2022.
  62. "Breaking a mirror – meaning of broken mirror". Mirror History. Archived from the original on 13 April 2017. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  63. "Luck and Horseshoes". Indepthinfo.com. Archived from the original on 29 October 2019. Retrieved 19 December 2011.
  64. ^ "Chinese customs, superstitions and traditions". us.mofcom.gov.cn. Archived from the original on 28 July 2022. Retrieved 28 July 2022.
  65. "Break a Leg". World Wide Words. Archived from the original on 3 April 2007. Retrieved 24 April 2007.
  66. McConnell, Joan; McConnell, Teena (1977). Ballet as body language. Harper & Row. ISBN 0-06-012964-6.
  67. Panati, Charles (1989). Panati's extraordinary origins of everyday things. New York. ISBN 0-06-096419-7. OCLC 20521056.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  68. "TrackSAFE – A rail safety superstition". tracksafe.co.nz. Archived from the original on 18 January 2023. Retrieved 28 July 2022.

Further reading

  • Khan, Khatib Ahmad; Aigerim, Danabekova; Yansheng, Wu; Ghayyas, Saba; Adil, Adnan (2024). "A Comparison of Superstitious Beliefs and Rituals in Buddhism and Islam". Pastoral Psychology. 73: 133–145. doi:10.1007/s11089-023-01057-z.

External links

Superstition
Main topics
Lists
Africa
Americas
Asia
Europe
General
Related
Categories: