| Revision as of 01:07, 30 October 2006 editSimonxag (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,268 edits SPI controversy - I know its on the religion list but ....← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:00, 21 October 2009 edit undoXqbot (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,319,594 editsm Robot: Fixing double redirect to Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Society, sports, and culture | ||
| (349 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| {{shortcut|]}} | |||
| {{RFCheader|Society, law, and sex}} | |||
| <!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> | |||
| *]: This is a controversy about whether a group of gay nuns called the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence belongs on this page. --] 01:07, 30 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *]. Are specific claims made in the article "exceptional" per ]? Is it acceptable to link to Southern Poverty Law Center as the only source in each instance? 19:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *]: proposing to add, in the "See Also" section, a link to ]. This supersedes the request below. 18:31, 25 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *]: Should ''all'' sourced information be included, even when it comes from extremist self-published partisan sources, or should the article be written with reference to non-partisan academic sources and scientific studies? 11:19, 21 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *]: Repeated deletions of any material alluding to exclusion of non-theists from Boy Scouts. 23:52, 20 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *]: Disagreement about the importance of the ] section in terms of whether it should be placed at the top of the article, or lower down. 22:10, 18 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] - whether the University is the oldest university in the Philippines. 09:14, 17 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] - Whether a drawn, black-and-white image depicting three people engaging in a sex act is an appropriate image for the article. 13:38, 14 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] - What Misplaced Pages guidelines or customs govern the "notability" threshold for items within an article? Is a "war" between two dormitories, which was covered in a long article in a campus newspaper, suitable for inclusion in an article whose topic is one of those dormitories? 23:40, 9 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] - There is a discussion about how to rate the importance of this article on the ]. 19:17, 9 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] Does this article use irrelevant facts and unverified claims to subtly discredit this organization? Do the citations in this article support the claims they are intended to support? 23:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] does recently added subsection adhere to ] and ]? 19:32, 5 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] Repeated vandalism against a sports league being mentioned in an article about that sport. Removing valid factual content, adding spam, making slanderous comments, using article to promote a business, and worst of all constantly undoing reverts without explanation. Need help. 17:15, 28 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] Should ] be added to an article about a man who advertised himself as a prostitute on the Internet? 17:11, 26 September 2006 (UTC)'''correction by another editor''' - The advertisement was for an "escort" not a "prostitute". 18:07, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *], lack of sources, original research, lack of discussion (and unwillingness to discuss) prior to complete reorganization and removal of content, formatting and structure of lead section, and ] present issues that need to be solved before article can be submitted to peer review. 11:14, 22 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *], dispute over name of the article 23:59, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <!--Add new items at the TOP, NOT HERE. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign--> | |||
Latest revision as of 15:00, 21 October 2009
Redirect to: