Misplaced Pages

User talk:PeacePeace: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:00, 19 June 2018 editPeacePeace (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,837 edits deletion← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:50, 12 January 2022 edit undoPaleoNeonate (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers29,743 edits How to legitimately edit again: new section 
(76 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Nobots}} {{Retired}}
== May Everyone Who Posts Here Find Peace ==


{{unblock reviewed | 1=I was essentially blocked for making suggestions on Talk Pages. Bold Edits are legal. If I was reverted, I never re-reverted or edit warred. Considerable voting to block me was done before I knew about the "court." The blocking is essentially the act of a bully who cannot even tolerate suggestions on Talk Pages if they are contrary to his POV. For example, he took umbrage at a talk page suggestion that like ''a divorced man seeking to see his children'' would be better called a divorced man seeking to see HIS children, while the article said "her" children. He used slur words to attack me, instead of rational argument, and never cited any violation of a Misplaced Pages rule. (] (]) 05:22, 10 September 2020 (UTC))| decline = That is not the reason for your block, you are blocked as a result of a community consensus for a site ban, and that could only be overturned by an appeal to the community. Such an appeal would need to address all of the problems raised in the ban discussion, which you have not come close to doing here - just arguing that the ban/block is wrong, and making personal attacks on other editors, will not suffice. If you do decide to make a proper appeal, it would be very unlikely to succeed just two days after the ban was imposed, and you were told to wait at least six months - which would give you time to think about it properly and work out a plausible response to the ban. ] (]) 08:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC)}}
Blessed are the peacemakers. (] (]) 18:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC))


*I've restored the declined unblock request, as that needs to remain here per ]. ] (]) 12:52, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
== Notice to Anyone Who Comes Here and Makes a False Attack ==


== How to legitimately edit again ==
I probably will not give you an answer. I wish peace with all. I avoid making personal attacks, though I have endured them from others here. If you come here wanting to fight or attack me, I will probably just erase it and move on, still wishing you the best. So realize if you have come here to make a false attack on me, you already have gotten your answer here. (] (]) 04:08, 18 August 2016 (UTC))


Since I've noticed that a sockpuppet of this account was recently blocked, of interest may be ] and ]. An appeal should normally be made from this original account. If it is successful, you could resume editing as PeacePeace. —]] – 21:50, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
==If you are a Misplaced Pages aristocrat, a Misplaced Pages noble==

If you are a Misplaced Pages administrator (or higher) come to post something on my talk page, please do me the favor of identifying yourself as such. And realize that I understand that Misplaced Pages is an aristocracy, & it does no good for me as a peasant entry level editor to argue with you or to defend myself if you came here to bully me or to impose your POV on me. I also realize that if I should complain about someone posting defamatory comments about myself or of lying in claiming I attacked someone (when I did not), the response (from a bully) is likely to be that I am at fault for claiming defamation instead of the person who defamed me for defaming me. So it is unlikely to accomplish anything positive for myself by posting a defense. So please understand why I generally avoid defending myself against such unjust charges here. My lack of defense does not mean that I accept a false charge. Of course it is also possible that someone may come here to give constructive criticism -- in which case I thank you for it. (] (]) 17:01, 5 September 2016 (UTC))

==Discussing streamlining US cannabis articles==
Your comments appreciated here: ]. ] (]) 22:27, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:50, 12 January 2022

Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PeacePeace (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was essentially blocked for making suggestions on Talk Pages. Bold Edits are legal. If I was reverted, I never re-reverted or edit warred. Considerable voting to block me was done before I knew about the "court." The blocking is essentially the act of a bully who cannot even tolerate suggestions on Talk Pages if they are contrary to his POV. For example, he took umbrage at a talk page suggestion that like a divorced man seeking to see his children would be better called a divorced man seeking to see HIS children, while the article said "her" children. He used slur words to attack me, instead of rational argument, and never cited any violation of a Misplaced Pages rule. (PeacePeace (talk) 05:22, 10 September 2020 (UTC))

Decline reason:

That is not the reason for your block, you are blocked as a result of a community consensus for a site ban, and that could only be overturned by an appeal to the community. Such an appeal would need to address all of the problems raised in the ban discussion, which you have not come close to doing here - just arguing that the ban/block is wrong, and making personal attacks on other editors, will not suffice. If you do decide to make a proper appeal, it would be very unlikely to succeed just two days after the ban was imposed, and you were told to wait at least six months - which would give you time to think about it properly and work out a plausible response to the ban. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How to legitimately edit again

Since I've noticed that a sockpuppet of this account was recently blocked, of interest may be WP:STANDARDOFFER and WP:APPEAL. An appeal should normally be made from this original account. If it is successful, you could resume editing as PeacePeace. —PaleoNeonate21:50, 12 January 2022 (UTC)