Misplaced Pages

Talk:Sex tourism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:50, 30 October 2006 editKyndFellow (talk | contribs)519 edits Definition of sex tourism← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:01, 16 October 2024 edit undoJohnnyBGoode04 (talk | contribs)4 edits Several mistakes: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic 
(715 intermediate revisions by 98 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
==Definition of sex tourism==
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Travel and Tourism|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Sexology and sexuality|importance=mid|sex-workers=yes|sex-workers-importance=high}}
}}


== Misplaced Pages Ambassador Program assignment ==
I just wrote a definition for "sex tourism" in the opening section of this article which is more general than the one we had. The previous definition seemed to only be concerned with prostitution and sexual abuse of child, which is not conclusive of the phenomenon. Although sex tourism is most often associated with prostitution, this is not present in every case.
This article is the subject of an ] at Rice University supported by the ] during the 2015 Spring term. Further details are available ].]


{{small|Above message substituted from {{tlc|WAP assignment}} on 14:41, 7 January 2023 (UTC)}}
Let me mention that I have a master's degree in clinical psychology from California State University, and that I have studied cultural anthropology at the University of Southern California as a minor of my undergraduate degree. I have also traveled extensively to many of the better known sex tourist destinations to observe and participate in these customs and rituals. I believe this is a good definition for sex tourism.


==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment==
If you have anything to add to this definition please say it here.<br>
] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2021-08-23">23 August 2021</span> and <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2021-12-10">10 December 2021</span>. Further details are available ]. Student editor(s): ].
Daniel E. Knodel, M.A. 22:47, 30 October 2006 (UTC)


{{small|Above undated message substituted from ] by ] (]) 09:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)}}
---------------
==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment==
] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2021-02-15">15 February 2021</span> and <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2021-05-06">6 May 2021</span>. Further details are available ]. Student editor(s): ].


{{small|Above undated message substituted from ] by ] (]) 09:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)}}
==Cuban sex trade==
== Can we talk about that map of the USA? ==


The North America map has a grey area representing the State of Nevada, where prostitution laws vary by country. That being said, the grey shape on the red US outline looks ''nothing'' like Nevada. Can someone correct that please? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 18:31, 1 January 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
The charge that Cuba is encouraging the sex trade is a political one that has no basis in fact, according to sociology professor Nelson Valdes:
:http://www.counterpunch.org/valdes10182003.html


== Contributing ==
Further, by defining sex tourism to include only travel from wealthy to poorer countries, the raging legal sex trade of the US state of Nevada is covered up. --] 21:05, 18 Oct 2003 (UTC)


Hi! I would like to contribute information to this page.
--] (]) 19:22, 19 March 2019 (UTC)


== Gay Sex Tourism ==
--------------------


Hi, I think this page is missing a section on gay sex tourism so I am currently working on it. ] (]) 18:23, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Excuse me, nobody said in this article that Cuba (or any other country) was encouaging the sex trade; no country would be that stupid. In fact the Cuban government has done much (although with limited success) to try to curtail/discourage sex tourism within its borders.


== Expanding on Opposition ==
However, the sex trade *IS* rampant there, I can personally attest to that! <g>


Hi, I feel the Opposition section could use some expansion. I added violence as a factor for sex workers as well as HIV statistics amongst sex workers. ] (]) 06:34, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Don't even get me started on that wacko leftist rag that you are quoting as fact! This is not the proper forum to espouse your political agenda. Select a more widely accepted publication, and maybe everyone here won't think you're a crackpot.


: {{reply|Lifeisgood20}} Hi, I didn't see any statistics about HIV, just an out of date assertions that " risk of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases is high among persons who exchange sex for money or non-monetary items". This was true 20 or 30 years ago in many third world countries, but thanks to education, condom campaigns, access to healthcare etc, ] figures suggest HIV prevalence amongst sex workers is no longer significantly higher than the general population in most countries.
Now, as for the "raging" sex trade in Nevada.... Cover up?? Please!


: Whilst there is violence against sex workers, I haven't seen any evidence that sex tourism increases this. Figures for the US, which is generally not a destination for sex tourism, are irrelevant here. --] (]) 17:15, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
A couple of overpriced brothel "ranches" in the middle of the desert do not qualify as a "raging" sex trade. Only the Donald Trumps and Bill Gates of the world could count Nevada as a sex tourist destination (and it would still be a poor one at that!) Chances are some of those girls in Nevada make more than most of us!


:: {{reply|John B123}} Hi, thank you for your feedback. I am curious, if my expansion on HIV was better supported with more up to date material, would you find that its place in opposition of sex tourism, should revert? As far as violence amongst sex workers, I find that its prevalence should remain in this catagory because, even though sex tourism isn't a "legal" market in the US as it may be in other countries, there is still a large underground sex tourism market, which should not go ignored. Therefore we also shouldn't ignore the violence that these sex workers (legal or not) endure. What are your thoughts? ] (]) 02:40, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
A sex worker in Thailand or Cuba earning $50 a day is doing well!!


::: {{reply|Lifeisgood20}} Hi, objections such as health risks, violence, stigmatism etc are more general objections against prostitution rather than specifically objections to sex tourism so would be more appropriately addressed in the ] article, unless of course there is evidence that sex tourists behave more violently or take more health risks.
Sorry, but when I see stupidity, I must rant...
::: There is also the problem of over-generalisation. Iceland, surprisingly, has become a sex tourism destination for men from Northern Europe in recent years. Both HIV and violence against women are extremely low in the country. Compare that with Bahrain, a middle east destination for sex tourism, where generally women are second class citizens and prostitution carries harsh sentences, violence is likely to be high because there is little risk of the victim reporting it. In sub-Saharan Africa, HIV prevalence rates are high amongst the general population, so compared to Iceland sex tourism to say Kenya carries higher risks.
::: Additionally, grouping sex workers together can also be misleading. Using your figures for the US, the murder rate quoted will be far less for legal sex workers in Nevada, but far higher for street workers in inner cities who prostitute themselves to feed their drug habits.
::: I do think there should be included in the article, although not as opposition as it is historical, the spread of HIV in the 1980s and 1990s through sex tourism. Prior to understanding HIV, it's causes, prevention and care, particularly by the general public, sex tourism did play a part in the spread of HIV. Sex tourism to sub-Saharan Africa, especially Kenya, and gay sex tourism to Haiti are the usually quoted examples. --] (]) 17:02, 16 April 2019 (UTC)


The subject needs more to compare with. One can go to a nightclub in Goa and experience violence and HIV. How is sex tourism per se any better or worse? Nobody has the numbers. The authors of papers sound as if they have never left academia, and are relying upon subjective tales from people who perhaps don't enjoy having casual sex with strangers.] (]) 12:35, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
-]


== Russian law and its Enforcement ==
: Yes, because CLEARLY no one goes to Las Vegas to take advantage of the direct-to-your-hotel-room "escorts" whose brightly colored advertisements are handed to you as you walk down the strip. Prostitution may not be technically legal in Vegas, but the ban against it is not enforced -- perhaps because sex tourism is a big part of what drives the LV economy. -- ] 19:32, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)


{{diff2|1049339522|1049260772|07:55, October 11, 2021}} - ''«Undid revision 1049260772 by John B123 talk) we should clarify which countries don't enforce the formal prohibition strictly»'' <br>
Prostitution exists everywhere, by your definition then ALL cities everywhere should be on this list.
{{diff2|1049260772|1049250505|20:22, October 10, 2021}} - ''«Undid revision 1049250505 by Alexander Davronov talk) Probably true of other countries too»'' <br>
There isn't enough room, and honestly isn't in the spirit of giving anyone any real USEFUL information. I've been to Vegas, I've also been to Bangkok, Rio, Havana and several other places on the list; there really is NO comparison. I'm not here to argue however, you want Nevada on this list FINE; but I'm certainly not going to leave it at the TOP of this list where you (or someone) decided to place it.--] 03:54, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
{{diff2|1049250505|1047908876|19:05, October 10, 2021}} - ''«‎Prostitution across the globe»''
: {{re|John B123}} I propose to keep details because it's unclear whether the laws are alive or dead. Best.
<span style="font-weight: bold" >] ] ]</span> 07:58, 11 October 2021 (UTC)


: {{re|Alexander_Davronov}} Firstly your additions are unreferenced, secondly, I'm not sure this is the right article to bring out enforcement of prostitution unless it has a direct impact on sex tourism.
Let me try to explain my rationale on this a bit better... Suppose Kris Kringle (living in the North Pole) decides to go somewhere warmer for summer vacation. He may very well pick Alaska, which to HIM is a warmer location. (Alaska would be the "Las Vegas" in your argument.) Now Kris could go online and think "Wow, I saw a complete lack of snow in Anchorage last summer." and therefore decides to add Anchorage, Alaska to a list of "popular destinations to enjoy warm weather". While from his perspective, he is right; from a GLOBAL perspective he is dead wrong. Trust me, as a die-hard whore monger I would love nothing more than to have a REAL "sex tourist" destination here in the US. There are many factors that define a good "sex tourist" destination as seen from a GLOBAL perspective, of these factors "legality" is probably the LEAST important. Prostitution is "technically" illegal in MOST sex tourist destinations (Thailand, Cambodia, etc). Zero enforcement in these countries helps, but it goes beyond that. Price, attitude (of the women), exotic location make up the bulk of the rest of the reasons these places are popular with the mongers. Las Vegas and Amsterdam do not have these reasons. Las Vegas probably has the lowest "bang for your buck" factor of any POSSIBLE sex tourist destination. If I want to drink, gamble, watch Wayne Newton, or pay $300 for a 30 minute "session" in my hotel room with a mean-spirited plastic-injected 30 something barbie doll then absolutely I want to go to Vegas. If I want to spend $30-$50 for a full night of the best sex ever with a beautiful, natural woman who knows no clock and still wants to be with you after the sun rises then I go to Thailand. --] 03:54, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
: Your additions have been reverted. Per ], you need to gain consensus here before re-adding them. --] (]) 08:25, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
::{{re|John B123}} You are advised to ] such information first; please see ]<br>{{re|John B123}} Relative to ]]: I added it by mistake; I know about talk. <span style="font-weight: bold" >] ] ]</span> 09:11, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
::{{re|John B123}} I've added sources to a similar statement, take a look: ]]; The section was badly arranged/named so I didn't notice that there is a duplicate; I propose to close this discussion <span style="font-weight: bold" >] ] ]</span> 09:44, 11 October 2021 (UTC)


== Unclear definition ==
--------------------


The opening sentence is: "Sex tourism refers to the practice of traveling to foreign countries, often on a different continent, with the intention of engaging in sexual activity or relationships in exchange for money or lifestyle support."
Would Amsterdam be a good country to add to the list of popular destinations for sex tourism? -- ] 19:32, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
This definition seems to say that sex tourism is traveling to another country and have sex in order to receive money or lifestyle support. I don't think that's correct. Aren't the people who practice sex tourism those who travel to another country and PAY locals there for sex? ] (]) 10:59, 17 April 2023 (UTC)


:I added an edit for this ] (]) 08:18, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
A better choice than Nevada, but only marginally so. If your not a sex monger you wouldn't understand this. See my previous message. --] 03:54, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)


==Wiki Education assignment: Sex, Gender, and Culture==
--------------------
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Misplaced Pages:Wiki_Ed/Northern_Kentucky_University/Sex,_Gender,_and_Culture_(Fall_2023) | assignments = ] | reviewers = ] | start_date = 2023-08-21 | end_date = 2023-12-08 }}


<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by ] (]) 14:23, 23 October 2023 (UTC)</span>
National preferences.
This is mostly written with regard to Western and I presume north American preferences, does anyone have anything useful to add about Japanese sex tourism. I'd like to add something about Japanese sex tourism and sex tour groups to China (basically your run of the mill coach trip but with sex laid on). However I don't know if it would be just pure jingoism on the part of the Chinese press, to believe that another motivation for Japanese sex tourism to China, is the desire to humiliate the Chinese(in a notorious case a tour coincided with the annivesary of the beginning of the Japanese invasion of China).] 07:51, 18 September 2005 (UTC)


== Grammar ==
---------------------------


The following quote from this article does not form a sentence, and has no meaning: "The World Tourism Organization of the United Nations has acknowledged about this industry is organized both within and outside the structured laws and networks created by them." ] (]) 19:54, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
"American men are also known to travel to developed countries such as Canada, the United Kingdom "
Is there really any evidence of this? I don't believe the UK is considered a sex tourist destination, especially as brothels are illegal, and London is a famously expensive place. ] 15:24, 11 October 2005 (UTC)


== Male sex tourism ==
I removed that line as, as far as I know, that prostitution '''is''' illegal in these countries, while the line seems to imply otherwise. ] 22:13, 19 October 2005 (UTC)


How come there is no definite information about male sex tourism?
:Prostitution itself is legal in Canada and in the UK, however several surrounding activities are illegal. But I agree: there's defintely no significant sex tourism from the US to either of those countries. ] 04:03, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
Although the article hints that male sex tourism is more common, there is no information found about it. While female sex tourism even got its own Misplaced Pages page.


Is this just because of sensationalism? I would really like to get some reliable information, especially regarding the numbers and other countries than South East Asia. Is there a way to flag a Misplaced Pages article so that hopefully experts on the field get it brought to their attention? The way it is know, people are none the wiser after reading this page. ] (]) 16:54, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
:Depends what you consider 'significant', I suppose? The Detroit-based adultmb.com (a discussion board for clients of "female escorts") is all but monopolised with info about Windsor, Ontario (as outcall prostitution is not unlawful there, unlike in the US). The "Dave from Phoenix" sites sexwork.com sexworktoronto.com also advocate travel from the US to Canada due to restrictive American laws. At what point is this "sex tourism"? Dunno. Détroit to Windsor is (geographically) almost the same city, Phoenix to Toronto is rather distant. Where does one draw the line in defining "tourism" if between adjacent countries? --] 17:02, 8 July 2006 (UTC)


== The 250,000 number ==
==Singapore & Batam==
Singapore has no such law, in spite of being adjacent to the sex tourism destination of Batam in Indonesia.


Given the suspicion behind other ] in this field and the general difficulty of estimating criminal behavior I've been trying to track down the original source of this statistic and the citation leads to nothing because of link rot:
I deleted this line and it was added back in... does it seem kinda out of place or random to anyone else?


The . (.) is dead and links to that isn't archived on the wayback machine.
:When deleting, please put a reason in the Edit Summary. Also, please sign your comments.


There are other sources which also list the 250,000 number and I which cites this paper https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281066431_SEX_TRAFFICKING_IN_THE_TOURISM_INDUSTR that claims the number is from World Vision Australia.
:I wrote the line, and I agree it needs work. But being incomplete is better than not being there. Other Wikipedians can add other examples that they know of, and/or I will add more information as I'm able to.


Looking at modern publications from World Vision Australia such as https://www.worldvision.com.au/docs/default-source/buy-ethical-fact-sheets/trafficking-and-sexual-exploitation-fact-sheet.pdf?sfvrsn=2
:The issue I believe deserves to be highlighted. Singapore I think is unusual in being adjacent to the child sex tourism destination. Thus a law in Singapore targeting child sex would be particularly significant. However I welcome alternative views.


it states that "It is impossible to accurately assess how many people are victims of sex trafficking worldwide" and they don't provide any estimates.
:Another reason I wasn't inclined to take your edit seriously is that you, or someone using your IP address, has made a habit of vandalizing Misplaced Pages articles (e.g. "Lee the bastard").


Looking through World Vision's historical publications on the wayback machine however I found this which states that there were 250,000 sex tourists total and that that number includes child sex tourism. The wording of the paragraph is quite confusing and it seems believable that someone could have misinterpreted what the number meant when citing and that that misinterpretation eventually ended up on Misplaced Pages.
:If you wish to contribute, please do so, but 1. do it in a constructive way, 2. fill in the edit summary, and 3. preferably create an account.


That World Vision document also claims that the actual source is from a childwise document retrieved in 2009 but the same url in 2010 contains no reference to the 250,000 number at all: https://web.archive.org/web/20100707032103/http://www.childwise.net/downloads/Child_Wise_Tourism_Information_S.pdf
:--] 05:15, 27 November 2005 (UTC)


Given that the current citation is dead, reputable organizations no longer cite this number, and that at least one citation chain ended up in what I can only assume is a misinterpretation I think it would be best to remove the statement that "250,000 travelling internationally to engage in sex tourism with children and youth alone" entirely as unsubstantiated. ] (]) 23:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC)


== Several mistakes ==


The sentence "Sexual activities that involve minors are universally non-consensual and illegal" is completely wrong, the vast majority of countries have an age of consent below 18, it would be more correct to talk about the prostitution of minors since that is indeed universally illegal. ] (]) 15:01, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your suggestions, I will post comments in, and sign my comments on talk pages.

Please, include the info about Batam as a CHILD PROSTITUTION DESTINATION, that is not how the article reads now.

:I've changed it to:
::] has been criticised for having no such law, in spite of being adjacent to the sex tourism destination of ] in ], which has many underage sex workers, some of whom have been tricked or forced into prostitution, according to media reports.

:It might be getting off the track a bit, although I believe the information is relevant.

I have no idea what you are reffering to about my IP address, here is my contrib list:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special:Contributions&target=69.107.52.142

Please let me know what you are refferencing.

:In that case I'll accept that I made an error. (I had looked at the IP address of the user who removed the line, which was 202.156.6.54, and viewed some of the edits at random... but I can't find them now, so I may have clicked the wrong thing. In any case you're obviously being reasonable about this question.) --] 03:28, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

btw, I have made an account and you'll see me around as Devalover
peace
] 07:02, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

:Great. Can't find your user page though. When you sign, use four tildes (the wavy symbol) to sign, then it links to your user page. Or just use the button above the edit box, second from the right. --] 03:29, 28 November 2005 (UTC)


--
CHANNELNEWSASIA REPORTS: SINGAPORE TO ENACT CHILD SEX TOURISM LAW
Time is GMT + 8 hours
Posted: 02 March 2006 1711 hrs

Government amending laws to deter child sex tourism
By S. Ramesh, Channel NewsAsia

SINGAPORE : The government is coming down hard on Singaporeans who
engage in sex with minors, even abroad.

It is amending its laws to extend extra-territorial jurisdiction over
its nationals who sexually exploit minors overseas.

Speaking in Parliament on Thursday, Senior Minister of State for Law
and Home Affairs Ho Peng Kee says the government is also making it an
offence to purchase sexual services from anyone who is under 18.

He says child sex tourists take advantage of the inability or the
unwillingness of the host country to prosecute them.

Back in Singapore, prosecution is also constrained as most countries
do not extend extra-territorial jurisdiction for sexual offences.

Professor Ho says: "Presently, Singaporeans who have sex with minors
in other countries cannot be prosecuted in Singapore as our courts do
not have jurisdiction over them.

"Members have urged the government to stop our nationals from preying
on minors from other counties by denying them a safe haven through
enacting legislation of extra-territorial effect. We have taken note
of these views and have factored them in our review."

The Home Affairs Ministry says despite the constraints and
difficulties in dealing with child sex cases overseas, Singapore
recognises that having sex with minors anywhere is deplorable.

So the government has decided to take firm action and amend the laws
to extend extra-territorial jurisdiction over Singapore nationals who
sexually exploit minors overseas.

The changes will be introduced once the on-going review of the Penal
Code is completed.

The Home Affairs Ministry is also tightening measures to protect young
persons from providing sexual services.

Professor Ho says: "Being more easily influenced, their consent can be
impaired. As such, they are more vulnerable to being trafficked,
controlled and exploited by pimps and traffickers who prey on them and
live off their earnings."

He says although there is no evidence to suggest that there are
significant numbers of 16- and 17-year olds engaging in prostitution,
the government feels there should be a higher age protection for
commercial sexual activities.

So, it has decided to make it an offence for anyone to purchase sexual
services from a person who is under 18. - CNA/de

==sex worker "work ethics?"==

Does this sentence make sense to anyone as a motive for sex tourism:
preferring the "work ethics" of foreign prostitutes to those of one's own country

] 07:12, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

:Yes. Work ethic is a polite way of saying "they love you long time". - ]] <sup>]</sup> 16:26, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

:) ahhhhh. thanks ] 15:58, 17 December 2005 (UTC)


==child prostitution==

Personally, I would like to see this section gone, or merged with ]... the article is about legal sex tourism... any thoughts?] 15:58, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

:The article is about sex tourism, legal or not.--] 23:04, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

:I think Devalover's point was there are TOO MANY references in the article as a whole about child prostitution. It gives the article a "bias". In this small article there is at least SIX references to "child prostitution" or pedophilia. "Child prostitution" should be a different article in and of itself with ONE link to and from this one. Unfortunately there are pedophiles in every sector of society. There isn't a single mention in ] or ] or even in ] (which I find amusing). Hmmm... but there are SIX references in this article along with 50% of the links. Actually, now that I have poked around a bit I've found ], probably most of that stuff can go there. I'll check out both this article and that one and see what can be put there. ] 08:07, 7 March 2006 (UTC)


: I've moved some of this stuff to it's own section "Crime and controversy", also cleaned up the section about sex tourism in the ] article (it was WAY biased). Anyhow.... boy this article is hard to keep NPOV! ;) ] 11:34, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

==Vandals==
Vandals in this page (Justin Hay?)


Ummm, yep!

Feel free to edit out any vandalisms you find. Also, you can sign your comments by typing 4 "~"'s ] 17:27, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

== Muslim countries?!? ==
Quote from the article:
:Occasionally, sex tourists go to conservative countries for the challenge of tricking women there into having sex with them. A notable case is ] who traveled to ] countries where he persuaded women to do degrading things by promising to marry and bring them to ]. He then posted photos online to boast of his conquests, but when his explicit materials were circulated back to ] many of the women were arrested, had their lives ruined, committed suicide or simply disappeared. "

This is the ONLY case of this sort of thing I've heard of. Does this need to be in "Destinations" ?? ] 11:12, 7 March 2006 (UTC)


:Nevermind, moved and reformatted to "Crime and controversy" section. ] 11:35, 7 March 2006 (UTC)


Nice with the crime and controversy sections Oarias, For this and the child prostitution sections.] 05:04, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

== Legal issues in the United States ==

Federal law prohibits American citizens to engage in international travel with the purpose of having sex with a person under the age of 17, even if the age of consent in the target country is below 18. Prosecutions under this law are very rare.

I changed this to

"Federal law prohibits American citizens to engage in international travel with the purpose of having sex with a person under the age of 18, even if the age of consent in the target country is below 18. Prosecutions under this law are very rare."

I believe the 17 number is incorrect. Please see the Protect Act of 2003.

http://en.wikipedia.org/PROTECT_Act_of_2003


== POV? ==
"In 2005 it was reported that Philippe Servaty, a newspaper columnist for Le Soir, traveled to Muslim countries where he persuaded women to do '''degrading''' things by promising to marry and bring them to Belgium. He then posted photos online to boast of his conquests, but when his explicit materials were circulated back to Morocco many of the women were arrested, had their lives ruined, committed suicide or simply disappeared."

Isn't that bolded word a hint of POV?

== Prostitution? ==

"Women sometimes give clothes, meals, cash and gifts to their holiday boyfriends, but not all (especially in Southern Europe) expect compensation."
I dont see how a man (or a woman for that matter) who is having sex with a tourist and does not expect compensation is considered a prostitute???

Latest revision as of 15:01, 16 October 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sex tourism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3
This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconTravel and Tourism High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSexology and sexuality: Sex work Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Sex work task force (assessed as High-importance).

Misplaced Pages Ambassador Program assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Rice University supported by the Misplaced Pages Ambassador Program during the 2015 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

Above message substituted from {{WAP assignment}} on 14:41, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): AlienLemonade.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 February 2021 and 6 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ialderton.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Can we talk about that map of the USA?

The North America map has a grey area representing the State of Nevada, where prostitution laws vary by country. That being said, the grey shape on the red US outline looks nothing like Nevada. Can someone correct that please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.32.203.188 (talk) 18:31, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Contributing

Hi! I would like to contribute information to this page. --Lifeisgood20 (talk) 19:22, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Gay Sex Tourism

Hi, I think this page is missing a section on gay sex tourism so I am currently working on it. Lifeisgood20 (talk) 18:23, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Expanding on Opposition

Hi, I feel the Opposition section could use some expansion. I added violence as a factor for sex workers as well as HIV statistics amongst sex workers. Lifeisgood20 (talk) 06:34, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

@Lifeisgood20: Hi, I didn't see any statistics about HIV, just an out of date assertions that " risk of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases is high among persons who exchange sex for money or non-monetary items". This was true 20 or 30 years ago in many third world countries, but thanks to education, condom campaigns, access to healthcare etc, UNAIDS figures suggest HIV prevalence amongst sex workers is no longer significantly higher than the general population in most countries.
Whilst there is violence against sex workers, I haven't seen any evidence that sex tourism increases this. Figures for the US, which is generally not a destination for sex tourism, are irrelevant here. --John B123 (talk) 17:15, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
@John B123: Hi, thank you for your feedback. I am curious, if my expansion on HIV was better supported with more up to date material, would you find that its place in opposition of sex tourism, should revert? As far as violence amongst sex workers, I find that its prevalence should remain in this catagory because, even though sex tourism isn't a "legal" market in the US as it may be in other countries, there is still a large underground sex tourism market, which should not go ignored. Therefore we also shouldn't ignore the violence that these sex workers (legal or not) endure. What are your thoughts? Lifeisgood20 (talk) 02:40, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
@Lifeisgood20: Hi, objections such as health risks, violence, stigmatism etc are more general objections against prostitution rather than specifically objections to sex tourism so would be more appropriately addressed in the prostitution article, unless of course there is evidence that sex tourists behave more violently or take more health risks.
There is also the problem of over-generalisation. Iceland, surprisingly, has become a sex tourism destination for men from Northern Europe in recent years. Both HIV and violence against women are extremely low in the country. Compare that with Bahrain, a middle east destination for sex tourism, where generally women are second class citizens and prostitution carries harsh sentences, violence is likely to be high because there is little risk of the victim reporting it. In sub-Saharan Africa, HIV prevalence rates are high amongst the general population, so compared to Iceland sex tourism to say Kenya carries higher risks.
Additionally, grouping sex workers together can also be misleading. Using your figures for the US, the murder rate quoted will be far less for legal sex workers in Nevada, but far higher for street workers in inner cities who prostitute themselves to feed their drug habits.
I do think there should be included in the article, although not as opposition as it is historical, the spread of HIV in the 1980s and 1990s through sex tourism. Prior to understanding HIV, it's causes, prevention and care, particularly by the general public, sex tourism did play a part in the spread of HIV. Sex tourism to sub-Saharan Africa, especially Kenya, and gay sex tourism to Haiti are the usually quoted examples. --John B123 (talk) 17:02, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

The subject needs more to compare with. One can go to a nightclub in Goa and experience violence and HIV. How is sex tourism per se any better or worse? Nobody has the numbers. The authors of papers sound as if they have never left academia, and are relying upon subjective tales from people who perhaps don't enjoy having casual sex with strangers.78.16.51.157 (talk) 12:35, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Russian law and its Enforcement

07:55, October 11, 2021 - «Undid revision 1049260772 by John B123 talk) we should clarify which countries don't enforce the formal prohibition strictly»
20:22, October 10, 2021 - «Undid revision 1049250505 by Alexander Davronov talk) Probably true of other countries too»
19:05, October 10, 2021 - «‎Prostitution across the globe»

@John B123: I propose to keep details because it's unclear whether the laws are alive or dead. Best.

AXONOV (talk) 07:58, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

@Alexander Davronov: Firstly your additions are unreferenced, secondly, I'm not sure this is the right article to bring out enforcement of prostitution unless it has a direct impact on sex tourism.
Your additions have been reverted. Per WP:BRD, you need to gain consensus here before re-adding them. --John B123 (talk) 08:25, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
@John B123: You are advised to WP:TAGGING such information first; please see Keep it, don't remove!
@John B123: Relative to : I added it by mistake; I know about talk. AXONOV (talk) 09:11, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
@John B123: I've added sources to a similar statement, take a look: ; The section was badly arranged/named so I didn't notice that there is a duplicate; I propose to close this discussion AXONOV (talk) 09:44, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Unclear definition

The opening sentence is: "Sex tourism refers to the practice of traveling to foreign countries, often on a different continent, with the intention of engaging in sexual activity or relationships in exchange for money or lifestyle support." This definition seems to say that sex tourism is traveling to another country and have sex in order to receive money or lifestyle support. I don't think that's correct. Aren't the people who practice sex tourism those who travel to another country and PAY locals there for sex? 2001:4643:1480:0:AD7B:6A5D:4100:A18F (talk) 10:59, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

I added an edit for this Fox.Walczak (talk) 08:18, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Sex, Gender, and Culture

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 8 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Peacheslovely777 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Esteban1517.

— Assignment last updated by Discourseparty (talk) 14:23, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Grammar

The following quote from this article does not form a sentence, and has no meaning: "The World Tourism Organization of the United Nations has acknowledged about this industry is organized both within and outside the structured laws and networks created by them." 162.253.11.91 (talk) 19:54, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Male sex tourism

How come there is no definite information about male sex tourism? Although the article hints that male sex tourism is more common, there is no information found about it. While female sex tourism even got its own Misplaced Pages page.

Is this just because of sensationalism? I would really like to get some reliable information, especially regarding the numbers and other countries than South East Asia. Is there a way to flag a Misplaced Pages article so that hopefully experts on the field get it brought to their attention? The way it is know, people are none the wiser after reading this page. 2A02:3100:3A98:4301:19E8:C2F9:3A5E:4B88 (talk) 16:54, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

The 250,000 number

Given the suspicion behind other widely cited and incorrect statistics in this field and the general difficulty of estimating criminal behavior I've been trying to track down the original source of this statistic and the citation leads to nothing because of link rot:

The current citation. (archive link.) is dead and links to another dead article that isn't archived on the wayback machine.

There are other sources which also list the 250,000 number and I found one which cites this paper https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281066431_SEX_TRAFFICKING_IN_THE_TOURISM_INDUSTR that claims the number is from World Vision Australia.

Looking at modern publications from World Vision Australia such as https://www.worldvision.com.au/docs/default-source/buy-ethical-fact-sheets/trafficking-and-sexual-exploitation-fact-sheet.pdf?sfvrsn=2

it states that "It is impossible to accurately assess how many people are victims of sex trafficking worldwide" and they don't provide any estimates.

Looking through World Vision's historical publications on the wayback machine however I found this This article which states that there were 250,000 sex tourists total and that that number includes child sex tourism. The wording of the paragraph is quite confusing and it seems believable that someone could have misinterpreted what the number meant when citing and that that misinterpretation eventually ended up on Misplaced Pages.

That World Vision document also claims that the actual source is from a childwise document retrieved in 2009 but the same url in 2010 contains no reference to the 250,000 number at all: https://web.archive.org/web/20100707032103/http://www.childwise.net/downloads/Child_Wise_Tourism_Information_S.pdf

Given that the current citation is dead, reputable organizations no longer cite this number, and that at least one citation chain ended up in what I can only assume is a misinterpretation I think it would be best to remove the statement that "250,000 travelling internationally to engage in sex tourism with children and youth alone" entirely as unsubstantiated. Null Reject (talk) 23:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Several mistakes

The sentence "Sexual activities that involve minors are universally non-consensual and illegal" is completely wrong, the vast majority of countries have an age of consent below 18, it would be more correct to talk about the prostitution of minors since that is indeed universally illegal. JohnnyBGoode04 (talk) 15:01, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Categories: