Misplaced Pages

Accession of Turkey to the European Union: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:48, 16 December 2004 editJoy (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators143,634 edits added a see-also section with two obvious candidates← Previous edit Latest revision as of 13:40, 26 December 2024 edit undo188.143.42.29 (talk)No edit summary 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{essay|date=November 2024}}
{{npov}}
{{Short description|Process of Turkey joining the EU}}
{{About|accession negotiations process|the broad perspective on relations between the European Union and Turkey|European Union–Turkey relations}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=November 2021}}
{{Use British English|date=November 2015}}
{{Infobox EU accession bid
| status = '''Frozen negotiations'''
| applied = 14 April 1987
| application_approved = 16 December 2004
| negotiations_start = 3 October 2005
| negotiations_finish = TBD
| NATO = Turkey became a member of NATO on ]
| OSCE = Member since 25 June 1973
| CoE = Türkiye became a member of the Council of Europe on 13 April 1950
| ICC = Türkiye is not a party to the Rome Statute, the founding treaty of the International Criminal Court
| nation = Turkey
| national_denonym = Turkish
| map = European Union Turkey Locator (with internal borders).svg
| progress = '''Negotiating / Stalled{{Citation needed|date=January 2022}}'''
| screening_progress = {{Progression|33|33}}
| chapters_closed = {{Progression|1|33}}
| ratification_progress = {{Center| ''Not yet applicable''}}
<!-- {{Progression|0|27}} -->
| national_population = 83,154,997<ref name=pop>{{cite web |url=https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/turkey/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210110073821/https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/turkey |archive-date=10 January 2021 |publisher=Central Intelligence Agency |title=CIA World Factbook: Turkey|date=9 November 2021}}</ref>
| national_area_total = 783,562
| national_GDP = $2.393 trillion
| national_GDP_PC = $32,278<ref name="IMF-WEO"/>
| national_HDI = 0.82
| national_gini = 41.9
| new_EU_population = 527,863,413 <br/> ''(+18.70%)''
| new_EU_area = 5,164,938 <br/> ''(+17.88%)''
| new_EU_GDP = 20,253 <br/> ''(+13.90%)''
| new_EU_GDP_PC = 38,367 <br/> ''(−3.74%)''
| new_languages = 25 <br/> (+1) ''(])''
| new_EU_HDI =
| new_EU_gini =
| website =


]
}}
] formally applied to join the ], the organisation that has since developed into the ], on 14 April 1987. It was officially recognised as a candidate for membership on 10 December 1999 at the ] summit of the ], having been an Associate Member since 1963, but it has not yet been permitted to start negotiations. Its probable future accession is now the central controversy of the ongoing ].
{{Ministry of European Union Affairs (Turkey)
}}
] is negotiating its accession to the ] (EU) as a member state, following its application to become a full member of the ] (EEC), the predecessor of the EU, on 14 April 1987.<ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.euractiv.com/en/enlargement/eu-turkey-relations/article-129678 |access-date=23 November 2021 |title=EU-Turkey relations |website=EurActiv.com |date=23 September 2004 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080706153600/http://www.euractiv.com/en/enlargement/eu-turkey-relations/article-129678 |archive-date=6 July 2008}}</ref>


After the ten founding members in 1949, Turkey became one of the first new members (]) of the ] in 1950.<ref name=tr>{{cite web |title=Turkey joins |url=https://70.coe.int/-/1950-turkey-joins |publisher=Council of Europe |access-date=23 June 2019 |archive-date=23 June 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190623161303/https://70.coe.int/-/1950-turkey-joins |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=tur>{{cite web |title=Turkey – Member state |url=https://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/turkey |publisher=Council of Europe |access-date=23 June 2019 |quote=Turkey became the 13th member State of the Council of Europe on 13 April 1950. |archive-date=1 June 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130601052130/https://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/turkey |url-status=live }}</ref> The country became an ] of the ] (EEC) in 1963 and was an ] of the ] from 1992 to its end in 2011. Turkey signed a ] with the EU in 1995 and was officially recognised as a candidate for full membership on 12 December 1999, at the ] summit of the ].
==Overview==
The main EU concerns about Turkey have been the ] and the involvement of the military in Turkish politics. The three decade long period of ] has also been a major deterrent, although Turkey has recently experienced strong growth and for the most part inflation problems are subsiding.


Negotiations for full membership were started on 3 October 2005.<ref>{{cite web|url= http://ec.europa.eu/commission_barroso/president/pdf/interview_20061015_en.pdf |title=Interview with European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso on BBC Sunday AM |publisher=European Commission |access-date=17 December 2006 |date=15 October 2006| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20061121143823/http://ec.europa.eu/commission_barroso/president/pdf/interview_20061015_en.pdf| archive-date= 21 November 2006 |url-status= live}}</ref> Progress was slow: out of the 35 chapters necessary to complete the accession process, only 16 had been opened and one had been closed by May 2016.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2016/05/14/never-mind-brexit-scaremongering-turkey-is-a-long-way-from-joining-the-eu/ |title=Never mind Brexit scaremongering – Turkey is a long way from joining the EU |last1=Phinnemore |first1=David |last2=İçener |first2=Erhan |date=14 May 2016 |website=blogs.lse.ac.uk |publisher=LSE |access-date=14 May 2016 |archive-date=14 May 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160514171050/http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2016/05/14/never-mind-brexit-scaremongering-turkey-is-a-long-way-from-joining-the-eu/ |url-status=live }}</ref> The early 2016 ] deal between Turkey and the European Union was intended to accelerate negotiations after previous stagnation and allow visa-free travel through Europe for Turks.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Kingsley |first1=Patrick |last2=Rankin |first2=Jennifer |title=EU-Turkey refugee deal – Q&A |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/08/eu-turkey-refugee-deal-qa |work=The Guardian |date=8 March 2016 |access-date=5 December 2019 |archive-date=7 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200407122015/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/08/eu-turkey-refugee-deal-qa |url-status=live }}</ref>
Turkey has started to thoroughly address these issues in the 1990s and the 2000s, with a strong and wide-reaching reform program under the ], a popular pro-European party with Islamist roots. Turkey also backed the latest EU-supported ] in 2004, although its military occupation of northern ] continues.


Since 2016, accession negotiations have stalled.<ref>{{cite web |title="Turkey is no longer an EU candidate", MEP says |url=http://www.euronews.com/2017/04/10/turkey-is-no-longer-an-eu-candidate-mep-says |publisher=Euro News |date=10 April 2017 |access-date=28 December 2020 |archive-date=10 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200310131012/https://www.euronews.com/2017/04/10/turkey-is-no-longer-an-eu-candidate-mep-says |url-status=live }}</ref> The EU has accused and criticized Turkey for human rights violations and deficits in ].<ref name=March2017 /> In 2017, EU officials said that the strong presidency created by the ] would violate the ] of eligibility for an EU membership.<ref name="Al-Monitor">{{cite web |url=http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2017/06/turkey-european-union-relations-possible-collision.html |publisher=Al-Monitor |title=New clashes likely between Turkey, Europe |date=23 June 2017 |access-date=8 October 2018 |archive-date=26 December 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191226134538/https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2017/06/turkey-european-union-relations-possible-collision.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
In response to these favorable developments, the EU may decide whether to start accession negotiations with Turkey at the end of 2004. The European Commission has given an initial recommendation to start the negotiations in early 2005, but has also added various precautionary measures. This recommendation and eventual accession now faces democratic approval processes in European and member states legislative procedures.


On 20 February 2019, a European parliament committee voted to suspend the accession talks, sparking criticism from the government of Turkey.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /><ref name=":3" /> Turkey's accession negotiations have therefore effectively come to a standstill and no further chapters can be considered for opening or closing and no further work towards the modernisation of the ] is foreseen.<ref name="end1" /><ref name="end2" /><ref name="EUcommissionJune2018">{{cite web |title=European Neighbourhood Policy And Enlargement Negotiations – European Commission: Turkey |url=https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/countries/detailed-country-information/turkey_en |publisher=European Commission |date=2 December 2019 |quote=the General Affairs Council decided in June 2018 that accession negotiations with Turkey are effectively frozen. |access-date=9 February 2020 |archive-date=10 December 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161210064852/https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/countries/detailed-country-information/turkey_en |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="PR-EPmarch2019">{{cite press release |title=Parliament wants to suspend EU accession negotiations with Turkey |url=https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20190307IPR30746/parliament-wants-to-suspend-eu-accession-negotiations-with-turkey |publisher=European Parliament |date=13 March 2019 |access-date=9 February 2020 |archive-date=7 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200407070634/https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20190307IPR30746/parliament-wants-to-suspend-eu-accession-negotiations-with-turkey |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="TRministryFebruary2019">{{cite web |title=Chronology Of Turkey-European Union Relations (1959–2019) |url=https://www.ab.gov.tr/siteimages/birimler/kpb/chronology-_en-_1959-_ocak2020.pdf |publisher=Republic of Turkey Ministry of Foreign Affairs – Directorate for EU Affairs |quote=February 20: European Parliament Foreign Affairs Committee agreed on a draft resolution that calling for the suspension of EU accession negotiations with Turkey. |access-date=9 February 2020 |archive-date=2 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200302031103/https://www.ab.gov.tr/siteimages/birimler/kpb/chronology-_en-_1959-_ocak2020.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>
One of the recommendations of the report, was that the EU will need to define its financial perspective for the period from 2014 before negotiations can be concluded. Though it is as yet unknown when Turkey will actually join, this clarified somewhat the timeframe: it may be unlikely to happen before 2015&mdash;while some EU officials have discussed 2019 as a potential end-date.


On 30 January 2023, the ] (then-main opposition alliance) in Turkey released a ] for common ]. It re-affirmed the opposition's intent to continue the EU accession talks if they were to be elected in ].<ref>{{Cite news |date=30 January 2023 |title=Ortak Politikalar Mutabakat Metni |page=230 |publisher=Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi |publication-place=Ankara |url=https://media.chp.org.tr/yayinlar/files/2023/1/30/51fb98b4-caa9-40a0-8788-f1e5634f2fea.pdf?tick=1675071647951 |access-date=25 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230309070334/https://media.chp.org.tr/yayinlar/files/2023/1/30/51fb98b4-caa9-40a0-8788-f1e5634f2fea.pdf?tick=1675071647951 |archive-date=9 March 2023}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Aydınlık |date=2023-01-30 |title=Altılı Masanın "Ortak Politikalar Mutabakat Metni" açıklandı! |url=https://www.aydinlik.com.tr/haber/altili-masanin-ortak-politikalar-mutabakat-metni-aciklandi-364403 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230131211732/https://www.aydinlik.com.tr/haber/altili-masanin-ortak-politikalar-mutabakat-metni-aciklandi-364403 |archive-date=31 January 2023 |access-date=2023-03-25 |website=Aydınlık |language=tr-TR}}</ref>
==Progress towards entry==
It is one of nine current EU candidate countries, together with ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ].
Turkey has ratified the Sixth Protocol to the ] and signed the 13th Protocol, meaning it has abolished the ] for all peace-time crimes and intends to abolish it for war-time crimes.


==History==
The AKP government has lifted a small part of the large-scale a ban on the teaching of ]&mdash;there are two private schools teaching Kurdish now &ndash; although it does not yet accept the use of Kurdish in regular education (as required by European conventions in those areas historically and currently inhabited by Kurds).
{{main|European Union–Turkey relations}}
===Background===
] in ], seat of the ], which Turkey joined on ]<ref name=tr/><ref name=tur/>]]


After the ] following ], ] led by ] emerged victorious in the ], establishing the modern Turkish Republic as it exists today. Atatürk, ], implemented ], including secularisation and industrialisation, intended to "Europeanise" or Westernise the country.<ref name="embassyhistory">{{cite web |publisher=Embassy of the Republic of Turkey (Washington, DC) |title=Turkey and EU |url= http://www.turkishembassy.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=57&Itemid=235 |access-date=4 July 2007 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20070927211417/http://www.turkishembassy.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=57&Itemid=235 |archive-date=27 September 2007 }}</ref> During ], Turkey ], when it joined the ]. The country took part in the ] of 1947, became a member of the ] in 1950,<ref name=tr/><ref name=tur/> and a member of ] in ].<ref name="TR_NATO">{{cite web|url= http://www.nato.int/multi/photos/1952/m520218a.htm |title=Greece and Turkey accede to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization|work=NATO Media Library |publisher=NATO|access-date=30 October 2006|date=18 February 1952| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20061101213946/http://www.nato.int/multi/photos/1952/m520218a.htm |archive-date= 1 November 2006 |url-status= live}}</ref> During the ], Turkey allied itself with the United States and Western Europe. The Turkish position vis-à-vis Europe has been characterized as "Europe has been an object of desire as well as a source of frustration for Turkish national identity in a long and strained history".<ref>{{cite journal |last=Ahiska |first=Meltem |title=Occidentalism: The Historical Fantasy of the Modern |journal=South Atlantic Quarterly |date=1 April 2003 |volume=102 |issue=2–3 |pages=351–379 |doi=10.1215/00382876-102-2-3-351|s2cid=144132845 }}</ref>
==Popular European opposition to Turkey's entry==
Opposition to Turkey's entry into the EU varies amongst the public of the current EU member states, as does political support or opposition to the entry bid. Some arguments put forth by some of those objecting to Turkey's EU candidacy include:
* That most of Turkey's territory is not European but ]n.
* Its large size, combined with the poor state of its economy, lends to arguments that the European Union would not be able to support Turkey or absorb the possibly large number of workers that might leave it for the other member states of the Union.
* Severe doubts on the democratic and secular nature of the actual turskish state (see also below);
* The ] &ndash; the island is still divided after Turkey's ] invasion of the country, with Turkey occupying and supporting the internationally unrecognised ]. Turkey continues to officially recognise only the ] and not the ], which is a EU member (currently utilizing sovereignty only over the southern part of the island).
* Closure of its border with ] (because of the conflict between Armenia and ] over ]. Azerbaijan is both ethnically and religiously close to Turkey. Armenia also wants their ] to be recognized by Turkey.)


===Brief history of major events===
==Democracy and human rights concerns==
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible;"
Many have continuing doubts on the commitment of the Turkish state to democracy and human rights (cfr. on these rules, the EU constitution & other conventions ), and its ability to reach European standards in these and other issues such as gender equality and minority rights (especially as regards the ] population). Freedom of political speech is another area which some have concerns over (e.g. 'Regular Report on Turkey&#8217;s progress towards accession', p. 36 and others). Some decry the recent recognition of the Kurdish language by Turkish authorities as a cosmetic operation. Kurdish education is provided through only a few private schools, while TV in Kurdish is only for a few hours a week and over a limited geographic area.
|+ class="nowrap" | Timeline
Turkey has been accused of 'bullying behaviour' towards smaller neighbours. For example, an economic embargo is currently maintained against ]. EU reports state that Turkey should take active measures this resolve situation before eventual accession.
!Date<ref name="Turkey">{{cite web |title=Turkey |url=https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/countries/detailed-country-information/turkey_en |publisher=European Commission |access-date=1 December 2020 |language=en |date=1 October 2020 |archive-date=10 December 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161210064852/https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/countries/detailed-country-information/turkey_en |url-status=live }}</ref>
!Event<ref name="Turkey"/>
|-
| 13 December 1997 || Luxembourg Council declares Turkey eligible to become an EU member.
|-
| 11 December 1999 || Helsinki Summit European Council declares Turkey a candidate country.
|-
| 24 March 2001 || Council adopts Accession Partnership for Turkey.
|-
| 19 May 2003 || Council adopts revised Accession Partnership for Turkey.
|-
| 16 December 2004 || European Council declares that Turkey sufficiently fulfils the criteria for opening accession negotiations beginning in October 2005.
|-
| 3 October 2005 || Council adopts negotiating framework and negotiations are formally opened. Screening process begins.
|-
| 1 June 2006 || Negotiations are opened and closed on Chapter 25 – Science and Research.
|-
| 11 December 2006 || Because Turkey refused to apply to Cyprus the Additional Protocol to the Ankara Agreement, Council decides that eight chapters will not be opened. {{Main|Cyprus dispute}}


|-
==Concerns over religion==
| 19 February 2008 || Council adopts revised Accession Partnership for Turkey.
] continues to enjoy large-scale privileges in Turkey, with thousands of ]s in state employment, while Turkish clerics from other religions are not paid at all. The Greek-Orthodox Church has not (yet) been able to re-open training schools for its clerics. Turkey also continues to post state-financed imams to EU member states. Some ]-citizens resent this as interference in the domestic affairs of their states.
|-
| 30 June 2010 || Negotiations are opened on Chapter 12 – Food Safety, Veterinary and Phytosanitary Policy.
|-
| 17 May 2012 || Positive Agenda intended to bring fresh dynamics into the EU-Turkey relations was launched.
|-
| 5 November 2013 || Negotiations are opened on Chapter 22 – Regional Policy and Coordination of Structural Instruments.
|-
| 16 December 2013 || Visa liberalisation dialogue launched and EU-Turkey Readmission Agreement signed.
|-
| 29 November 2015 || First EU-Turkey Summit held and Joint EU-Turkey Action Plan activated. The EU welcomes Turkey's commitment to accelerate the fulfilment of the Visa Roadmap benchmarks in return for halting the flow of Syrian refugees from Turkey to Greece.<ref>{{cite press release|url=http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-16-582_en.htm|title=European Commission – Commission Visa Progress Report: Turkey makes progress towards visa liberalisation|website=europa.eu|access-date=5 September 2017|archive-date=23 September 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170923132549/http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-16-582_en.htm|url-status=live}}</ref>
|-
| 14 December 2015 || Negotiations are opened on Chapter 17 – Economic and Monetary Policy.
|-
| 30 June 2016 || Negotiations are opened on Chapter 33 – Financial and Budgetary Provisions.
|-
| 24 November 2016 || MEPs vote overwhelmingly to suspend negotiations with Turkey over human rights and rule of law concerns.
|-
| 6 July 2017 || EU parliament called for the suspension of accession negotiations with Turkey.
|-
| 20 February 2019 || EU parliament committee votes to suspend accession talks with Turkey.
|-
| 13 March 2019 || The European Parliament unanimously accepted the call for the suspension of full membership negotiations between the EU and Turkey.
|-
| 19 May 2021 || The European Parliament unanimously accepted the call for the suspension of accession negotiations between the EU and Turkey.<ref name=2019susp>{{cite web|url=https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20210517IPR04118/eu-turkey-relations-are-at-a-historic-low-point-say-meps|title=EU-Turkey relations are at a historic low point, say MEPs|language=en|date=May 19, 2021|publisher=European Parliament}}</ref>
|}


===1950s–1990s===
The issue of church and state separation is thus another major concern for European democrats.
Turkey first applied for ] in the ] in 1959, and on 12 September 1963 signed the "Agreement Creating An Association Between The Republic of Turkey and the European Economic Community", also known as the ]. This agreement came into effect the following year on 12 December 1964. The Ankara Agreement sought to integrate Turkey into a customs union with the EEC whilst acknowledging the final goal of membership.<ref name="embassyhistory"/> In November 1970, a further protocol called the "Additional Protocol" established a timetable for the abolition of tariffs and quotas on goods traded between Turkey and the EEC.<ref name="embassyhistory"/>


On 14 April 1987, Turkey submitted its application for formal membership into the European Economic Community. The ] responded in December 1989 by confirming Ankara's eventual membership but also by deferring the matter to more favourable times, citing Turkey's economic and political situation, as well its ] and the ] as creating an unfavourable environment with which to begin negotiations.<ref name="embassylondon">{{cite web|publisher=Embassy of the Republic of Turkey in London|url= http://www.turkishembassylondon.org/canon/aboutturkey_eu.htm|title=About Turkey and the EU|access-date=4 July 2007|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20070927205928/http://www.turkishembassylondon.org/canon/aboutturkey_eu.htm|archive-date=27 September 2007 }}<!-- do not substitute the article in the other embassy's as they do not mention the deferral --></ref> This position was confirmed again in the Luxembourg European Council of 1997 in which accession talks were started with central and eastern European states and Cyprus, but not Turkey. During the 1990s, Turkey proceeded with closer integration with the European Union by agreeing to a ] in 1995. In 1999, following the ], Greece lifted its opposition to Turkey's accession to the European Union. Moreover, the Helsinki Summit European Council of 1999 proved a milestone as the EU recognised Turkey as a candidate on equal footing with other potential candidates.
Moreover, some religious traditions are a concern, as they may be at odds with official equality policy &ndash; for example the continued consecration of polygamous marriages by state-paid imams, or recent police instructions on public behaviour that follow strict ] lines (even holding hands would be punishable).


===2000s===
==Turkey's arguments for entry - pro & contra==
The next significant step in EU–Turkey relations came with the December 2002 Copenhagen European Council.<ref name=EuropeanCouncilCopenhagen2002>{{cite web|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/73842.pdf|title=European Council: EU would open accession negotiations with Turkey|access-date=5 September 2017|archive-date=21 June 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190621201444/https://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/73842.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> According to it, "the EU would open negotiations with Turkey 'without delay' if the European Council in December 2004, on the basis of a report and a recommendation from the Commission, decides that Turkey fulfills the Copenhagen political criteria."<ref name=EuropeanCouncilCopenhagen2002/> French President ] and German Chancellor ] expressed joint support for the December 2004 European Commission summit meeting agenda for Turkey joining the European Union.<ref>{{cite web |title=Germany, France Want Turkey in EU |url=https://www.dw.com/en/germany-france-want-turkey-in-eu/a-1377262 |publisher=Deutsche Welle |date=26 October 2004 |access-date=28 December 2020 |archive-date=15 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210415060731/https://www.dw.com/en/germany-france-want-turkey-in-eu/a-1377262 |url-status=live }}</ref>
Turkey stresses its involvement in ] for about 500 years, mostly through the ]. It considers itself a European state. A prevalent point of view in Turkey, echoed by its prime minister Erdogan, is that the EU seems to be a ] club, that the EU has anyway no right to consider itself that way, and that this causes reluctance to accept a ] state into the Union.
The Turks consider their state a strongly ] one, just as the EU defines itself (for example with the abandonment of the proposals to make reference to Europe's Christian heritage in the draft ]).


The ] recommended that the negotiations should begin in 2005, but also added various precautionary measures. The EU leaders agreed on 16 December 2004 to start accession negotiations with Turkey from 3 October 2005.<ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.independentcommissiononturkey.org/oped_20050831.html|title=Independent Commission on Turkey|access-date=7 June 2015|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160109202339/http://www.independentcommissiononturkey.org/oped_20050831.html |archive-date=9 January 2016}}</ref> While ] and Germany initially wanted to leave open the possibility that negotiations with Turkey would lead to a ], less than full membership, accession negotiations were ultimately launched with the "shared objective" of membership.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=24900 |title= Today's Zaman: Turkey Starts Full Membership Negotiations with EU |access-date= 28 July 2009 |archive-date= 19 September 2012 |archive-url= https://archive.today/20120919044840/http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=24900 }}</ref>
However, the concept of a secular state may differ significantly amongst the public and politicians in Turkey, and in the EU. In addition, Turkey has not contributed to any of the major social, political, philosophical or scientific developments that led the European Union to its current status. With regard to the gap in institutional and democratic development, many conclude that Turkey has not taken part in the key Europe's developments from the last centuries, and, worse, that, given its ongoing lage-scale discriminations, it is not not honestly willing to adopt the core European value of a secular democracy without discriminations.


Turkey's accession talks have since been stalled by a number of domestic and external problems. Both Austria and France have said they would hold a referendum on Turkey's accession. In the case of France, a change in its Constitution was made to impose such a referendum, but later another constitutional change has enabled the parliament (if a large majority of its members agrees) to prevent such a referendum.<ref name=AustriaRef>{{cite web|url= http://www.eubusiness.com/news-eu/1239805023.06 |title=Turkey, with eye on EU, says determined to reform |date=15 April 2009 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090417223231/http://www.eubusiness.com/news-eu/1239805023.06 |archive-date=17 April 2009 |work=EUbusiness |access-date=27 December 2020}}</ref> The issue of Cyprus continues to be a major obstacle to negotiations.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://euobserver.com/9/23008|title=Cyprus threatens to block EU deal on Turkey talks|date=December 2006 |access-date=7 June 2015|archive-date=5 June 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110605120214/http://euobserver.com/9/23008|url-status=live}}</ref> European officials have commented on the slowdown in Turkish reforms which, combined with the Cyprus problem, led the EU's Enlargement Commissioner ] in March 2007 to warn of an impending 'train crash' in the negotiations.<ref name="economist2">{{cite news |url=https://www.economist.com/special-report/2007/03/17/the-ins-and-outs |title=The ins and outs: The EU's most effective foreign-policy instrument has been enlargement. But how far can it go? |newspaper=The Economist |date=17 March 2007 |access-date=18 May 2020 |url-access=limited |archive-date=1 July 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110701061352/http://www.economist.com/research/articlesBySubject/displaystory.cfm?subjectid=682266&story_id=8808134 |url-status=live }}</ref> Due to these setbacks, negotiations again came to a halt in December 2006, with the EU freezing talks in 8 of the 35 key areas under negotiation.<ref>{{cite web|url= https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/eu-freezes-talks-on-turkey-membership-428085.html |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20121111132322/http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/eu-freezes-talks-on-turkey-membership-428085.html |archive-date=2012-11-11 |url-access=limited |url-status=live |title=EU freezes talks on Turkey membership |website=Independent.co.uk |date=12 December 2006 |access-date=5 September 2017}}</ref>
==See also==
* ]
* ]


In 2007, Turkey stated that they were aiming to comply with EU law by 2013,<ref>{{cite news |url=http://euobserver.com/9/23813 |access-date=26 August 2008 |title=Turkey targets 2013 for EU legal compliance |work=EUobserver |date=30 March 2007 |first=Lucia |last=Kubosova |archive-date=16 February 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180216025201/https://euobserver.com/enlargement/23813 |url-status=live }}</ref> but Brussels refused to back that as a deadline for membership.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://euobserver.com/9/23881 |access-date=26 August 2008 |title=Brussels declines to endorse 2013 date for Turkey's EU entry |work=EUobserver |first=Lucia |last=Kubosova |date=17 April 2007 |archive-date=23 December 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151223084123/https://euobserver.com/enlargement/23881 |url-status=live }}</ref> In 2006 President of the European Commission ] said that the accession process will take at least until 2021.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/commission_barroso/president/pdf/interview_20061015_en.pdf|title=Interview with European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso on BBC Sunday AM|access-date=13 April 2007|archive-date=21 November 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061121143823/http://ec.europa.eu/commission_barroso/president/pdf/interview_20061015_en.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> In a visit to Germany on 31 October 2012, Turkish Prime Minister ] made clear that Turkey was expecting membership in the Union to be realised by 2023, the 100th Anniversary of the Turkish Republic, implying that they could end membership negotiations if the talks had not yielded a positive result by then.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://news.yahoo.com/merkel-reassures-turkey-eu-talks-erdogan-raps-cyprus-154249524.html |title=Merkel reassures Turkey on EU talks, Erdogan raps Cyprus |last1=Coskun |first1=Orhan |last2=Hudson |first2=Alexandra |date=31 October 2012 |access-date=4 November 2012 |agency=Reuters |archive-date=3 November 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121103084326/https://news.yahoo.com/merkel-reassures-turkey-eu-talks-erdogan-raps-cyprus-154249524.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Turkish President ] said that upon completing the accession process Turkey will hold a referendum for Turkish membership in the European Union.<ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.euractiv.com.tr/ab-ve-turkiye/article/gul-biz-de-ab-uyeligini-referanduma-goturecegiz-027101|title=Gül: 'Biz de AB üyeliğini referanduma götüreceğiz' |access-date=7 June 2015|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20150715021324/http://www.euractiv.com.tr/ab-ve-turkiye/article/gul-biz-de-ab-uyeligini-referanduma-goturecegiz-027101 |archive-date=15 July 2015 }}</ref>
]

]
In December 2009, EU member the ] blocked 6 chapters of Turkish accession negotiations, including those on Judiciary and Fundamental Rights, Energy and Education and Culture, arguing that Turkey needs to first normalise relations with Cyprus.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.pseka.net/index.php?module=article&id=12350|title=Cyprus won't open EU accession chapters for Turkey|access-date=7 June 2015|archive-date=8 October 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181008061255/http://news.pseka.net/index.php?module=article&id=12350|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url= http://famagusta-gazette.com/fule-urges-turkey-to-implement-additional-protocol-p18332-69.htm|title=Fule urges Turkey to implement Additional Protocol|access-date=7 June 2015|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20140111213307/http://famagusta-gazette.com/fule-urges-turkey-to-implement-additional-protocol-p18332-69.htm|archive-date=11 January 2014}}</ref> As a result, no chapters have been opened since June 2010.<ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.epc.eu/documents/uploads/pub_3021_turkey-eu_relations.pdf |first=Amanda |last=Paul |title=Turkey-EU Relations: time to rebuild trust |date=19 October 2012 |publisher=Wuropean Policy Centre |location=Brussels |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20181008061238/http://www.epc.eu/documents/uploads/pub_3021_turkey-eu_relations.pdf |archive-date=8 October 2018 |access-date=27 December 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.todayszaman.com/news-232531-turkey-tells-eu-it-may-postpone-competition-chapter-if-needed.html|title=Turkey tells EU it may postpone competition chapter if needed|work=TodaysZaman|access-date=7 June 2015|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20150715013128/http://www.todayszaman.com/news-232531-turkey-tells-eu-it-may-postpone-competition-chapter-if-needed.html |archive-date=15 July 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.todayszaman.com/news-267358-turkey-sees-bleak-future-for-eu-accession-talks-in-2012.html|title=Turkey sees bleak future for EU accession talks in 2012 |work=TodaysZaman|access-date=7 June 2015|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20150715025052/http://www.todayszaman.com/news-267358-turkey-sees-bleak-future-for-eu-accession-talks-in-2012.html |archive-date=15 July 2015}}</ref> Hence, there is no chapter Turkey could open other than the difficult and economically detrimental chapters Competition Policy, Social Policy and Employment, and Public Procurement that most candidate countries open at the end of accession as all other chapters were blocked. In February 2013, Turkish Deputy Undersecretary of the Ministry for EU Affairs, Burak Erdenir, claimed that the EU had yet to communicate to Turkey the benchmark criteria for opening chapters 23 and 24, Judiciary & Fundamental Rights and Justice, Freedom & Security, which was to be done after screening of the chapters was completed in 2006, thus making it impossible to comply with them. He also suggested this was a deliberate attempt to slow their accession process.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.euractiv.com/enlargement/got-necessary-eu-benchmarks-turk-news-517614|title=Turkey: EU political benchmarks 'were never given to us'|date=7 February 2013|access-date=9 February 2013|publisher=eurActiv|archive-date=9 January 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160109202339/http://www.euractiv.com/enlargement/got-necessary-eu-benchmarks-turk-news-517614|url-status=live}}</ref>
]

===Positive agenda (2012–13)===
After over two years of no chapter openings, the European Commission set up a "Positive Agenda" designed to focus on common EU-Turkey interests. EU Commissioner for expansion Stefan Füle describes that the goal was "to keep the accession process alive and put it properly back on track after a period of stagnation which has been a source of frustration for both sides."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.aa.com.tr/en/news/51799--s |title=EU Commissioner Fule: Positive Agenda to put EU process back on track |work=Anadolu Agency |access-date=5 September 2017 |archive-date=10 May 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150510175414/http://www.aa.com.tr/en/news/51799--s |url-status=live }}</ref> The EU Commission mentioned a broad range of areas as the main elements of the Agenda such as "intensified dialogue and cooperation on political reforms", "visa", "mobility and migration", "energy", "fight against terrorism", "further participation of Turkey in Community programmes", "town twinning", "trade and the Customs Union" and "supporting efforts to align with the acquis, including on chapters where accession negotiations cannot be opened for the time being". The proposal was considered favorably on the condition that it serves as an instrument in support of and complementary to the negotiation process with the EU.

In the framework of "Positive Agenda", Working Groups were established on 8 chapters ("3-Right of Establishment and Freedom to Provide Services", "6-Company Law", "10-Information Society and Media", "18-Statistics", "23-Judiciary and Fundamental Rights", "24-Justice, Freedom and Security", "28-Consumer and Health Protection", and "32-Financial Control"). The "Positive Agenda" kick-off meeting was held on 17 May 2012 in Ankara with the participation of Stefan Füle, EU Commissioner for Enlargement and European Neighbourhood Policy. As a result of the Working Groups meetings held so far, a total of four closing benchmarks were confirmed to have been met by Turkey in three chapters (Company Law, Consumer and Health Protection as well as Financial Control chapters).<ref name="ifri"/><ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.euractiv.com.tr/ab-ve-turkiye/article/bagis-dort-fasilda-kapanis-kriterlerini-yerine-getirdigimizin-teyidini-aldik-026701 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20140111210633/http://www.euractiv.com.tr/ab-ve-turkiye/article/bagis-dort-fasilda-kapanis-kriterlerini-yerine-getirdigimizin-teyidini-aldik-026701|archive-date=11 January 2014|title=Bağış: 'Dört fasılda kapanış kriterlerini yerine getirdiğimizin teyidini aldık'|access-date=7 June 2015}}</ref>

On 20 June 2013, in the wake of ]'s crackdown on ] in ], Germany blocked the start to new EU accession talks with Turkey.<ref name="Dombey FT">{{cite news |author=Dombey, Daniel |author2=James Fontanella-Khan |author3=Quentin Peel |title=Germany blocks Turkey's bid to join EU|url=http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/2432cc2c-d9c0-11e2-bab1-00144feab7de.html#axzz2WsY07fBe|access-date=21 June 2013|newspaper=Financial Times|date=21 June 2013|archive-date=27 September 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190927220126/https://www.ft.com/content/2432cc2c-d9c0-11e2-bab1-00144feab7de#axzz2WsY07fBe|url-status=live}}</ref> According to the '']'', one Turkish official said that such a move could potentially break off political relations with the ].<ref name="Dombey FT" />

A ] poll which included EU countries and candidate countries as well, showed that 43% of Turks viewed the EU positively, as compared with 60% six months previously. In the same poll, 29% of Turks polled expressed support for an ], the lowest level of support among EU countries and candidates polled.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/english/4713737.asp?gid=74|title=New Eurobarometer poll results show a drop in Turkish support for the EU|work=Hürriyet|access-date=23 September 2013|archive-date=15 December 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181215224600/http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/new-eurobarometer-poll-results-show-a-drop-in-turkish-support-for-the-eu-4713737|url-status=live}}</ref> Germany said that its reservation stems from a technical issue, but then-Chancellor ], an opponent of Turkish entry into the EU, described herself as "shocked" after Ankara's use of overwhelming police force against mostly peaceful demonstrators.<ref name="Dombey FT" /> France stated that they would not waive their veto over unfreezing four accession chapters with Turkey until after the elections for the European Parliament in June 2014.<ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.todayszaman.com/news-330679-turkey-welcomes-new-chapter-in-eu-talks-wants-more-progress.html |title=Turkey welcomes new chapter in EU talks, wants more progress|date=5 November 2011 |access-date=10 November 2013 |publisher=Today's Zaman |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20131109234257/http://www.todayszaman.com//news-330679-turkey-welcomes-new-chapter-in-eu-talks-wants-more-progress.html |archive-date=9 November 2013}}</ref>

===Stalled talks (2016–present)===

Following President Erdoğan's crackdown on supporters of the ], EU relations became damaged. Erdoğan has indicated his approval of reinstating the death penalty to punish those involved in the coup, with the EU suggesting that this would end its EU ambitions. On 26 July 2016, ] ] announced that Turkey's EU membership process would come to an end if the death penalty was returned in Turkey.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/dunya/abden-turkiyeye-idam-cezasi-geri-gelirse-uyelik-surecini-durdururuz-40168261|title=AB'den Türkiye'ye: İdam cezası geri gelirse...|language=tr|date=July 26, 2016|work=Hürriyet|access-date=21 August 2023|archive-date=21 August 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230821085313/https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/dunya/abden-turkiyeye-idam-cezasi-geri-gelirse-uyelik-surecini-durdururuz-40168261|url-status=live}}</ref> Erdoğan stated in November 2016 that he was considering putting Turkey's continued negotiations with the EU on membership to a referendum in 2017.<ref name=referendum>{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-turkey-eu-erdogan-idUSKBN1391H4|title=Turkey could put EU talks to a referendum next year: Erdogan|date=14 November 2016|access-date=22 November 2016|publisher=Reuters|archive-date=14 November 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161114233851/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-turkey-eu-erdogan-idUSKBN1391H4|url-status=live}}</ref> In November 2016, the European Parliament voted in favour of a non-binding resolution to request that the European Commission temporarily suspend membership negotiations due to the "disproportionate repressive measures" of the government to the coup.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-38090121|title=Euro MPs vote to freeze Turkey EU membership talks|date=24 November 2016|access-date=24 November 2016|publisher=BBC|archive-date=24 November 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161124130403/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-38090121|url-status=live}}</ref> On 13 December, the ] (comprising the heads of state or government of the member states) resolved that it would open no new areas in Turkey's membership talks in the "prevailing circumstances";<ref name="Yahoo">{{Cite news|url=https://www.yahoo.com/news/eu-says-wont-open-turkey-membership-chapters-165121377.html|title=EU says won't expand Turkey membership talks|publisher=Yahoo|date=13 December 2016|access-date=15 December 2016|archive-date=30 December 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191230224317/https://www.yahoo.com/news/eu-says-wont-open-turkey-membership-chapters-165121377.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Turkey's path toward autocratic rule makes progress on EU accession impossible.<ref name="Marc Pierini">{{cite news |url=http://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/66408 |title=Turkey's Impending Estrangement From the West |first=Marc |last=Pierini |publisher=Carnegie Europe |date=12 December 2016 |access-date=15 December 2016 |archive-date=6 February 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200206183255/https://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/66408 |url-status=live }}</ref>
In 2016, EU member Austria opposed Turkey's EU membership.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36973319.amp |title=Turkey scolds Austria in EU membership dispute |website=bbc.com |date=4 August 2016 |access-date=20 November 2022 |archive-date=19 November 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221119221353/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36973319.amp |url-status=live }}</ref>

In April 2017, the ] (PACE) voted to reopen its monitoring procedure against Turkey. This vote is widely understood to deal a major blow to Turkey's prospect of eventual EU membership, as exiting that process was made a precondition of EU accession negotiations back in 2004.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.euractiv.com/section/global-europe/news/turkeys-eu-bid-in-jeopardy-after-council-of-europe-vote/|title=Turkey's EU bid in jeopardy after Council of Europe vote|publisher=Euractiv|date=25 April 2017|access-date=25 April 2017|archive-date=25 April 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170425152735/http://www.euractiv.com/section/global-europe/news/turkeys-eu-bid-in-jeopardy-after-council-of-europe-vote/|url-status=live}}</ref> In June 2017, members of the ] expressed that the strong presidency created by the ] violate the ] of eligibility for an EU membership.<ref name="Al-Monitor"/> On 6 July 2017, the ] approved a resolution calling for the suspension of full membership negotiations between the EU and Turkey.<ref>{{cite web |url =https://www.dw.com/tr/apden-t%C3%BCrkiye-ile-m%C3%BCzakerelerin-ask%C4%B1ya-al%C4%B1nmas%C4%B1na-onay/a-39572885 |title =AP: Türkiye ile müzakereler askıya alınsın |language =tr |date =July 6, 2017 |work =DW Türkçe |access-date =5 September 2023 |archive-date =6 September 2023 |archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20230906052103/https://www.dw.com/tr/apden-t%C3%BCrkiye-ile-m%C3%BCzakerelerin-ask%C4%B1ya-al%C4%B1nmas%C4%B1na-onay/a-39572885 |url-status =live }}</ref>

The European Commission's long-term budget proposal for the 2021–2027 period released in May 2018 included pre-accession funding for a Western Balkan Strategy for further enlargement, but omitted Turkey.<ref name=cut>{{cite news|url=https://ahvalnews.com/eu-turkey/eu-plans-cut-financial-assistance-turkey|title=EU plans to cut financial assistance to Turkey|publisher=Ahval|date=6 May 2018|access-date=6 May 2018|archive-date=26 December 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191226085521/https://ahvalnews.com/eu-turkey/eu-plans-cut-financial-assistance-turkey}}</ref>

In March 2018, Austrian Chancellor ] opposed Turkey's EU accession talks and urged it to halt membership talks.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://armenpress.am/eng/amp/927569 |title=Austrian Chancellor Kurz urges to stop Turkey's EU accession talks |website=armenpress.am |date=26 March 2018 |access-date=20 November 2022 |archive-date=16 June 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180616214234/https://armenpress.am/eng/amp/927569 |url-status=live }}</ref> On 26 June 2018, the EU's ] stated that "the Council notes that Turkey has been moving further away from the European Union. Turkey's accession negotiations have therefore effectively come to a standstill and no further chapters can be considered for opening or closing and no further work towards the modernisation of the ] is foreseen." The Council added that it is "especially concerned about the continuing and deeply worrying backsliding on the rule of law and on fundamental rights including the freedom of expression."<ref name=end1>{{cite web|url=https://cyprus-mail.com/2018/06/26/eu-council-issues-strong-message-about-turkeys-obligations/|title=EU Council issues strong message about Turkey's obligations|date=26 June 2018|publisher=Cyprus Mail|access-date=8 October 2018|archive-date=7 April 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200407070648/https://cyprus-mail.com/2018/06/26/eu-council-issues-strong-message-about-turkeys-obligations/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=end2>{{cite news|url=https://www.zeit.de/politik/ausland/2018-06/recep-tayyip-erdogan-wahl-eu-zollunion-erklaerung|title=EU will Zollunion mit der Türkei nicht ausbauen|date=27 June 2018|newspaper=Die Zeit|language=de|access-date=8 October 2018|archive-date=27 June 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180627005416/https://www.zeit.de/politik/ausland/2018-06/recep-tayyip-erdogan-wahl-eu-zollunion-erklaerung|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=council>{{cite web|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/35863/st10555-en18.pdf|title=Enlargement and Stabilisation and Association Process Council conclusions|date=26 June 2018|work=Council of the European Union|access-date=8 October 2018|archive-date=22 July 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180722040617/https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/35863/st10555-en18.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>

On 20 February 2019, a European parliament committee voted to suspend the accession talks, sparking criticism from the government of Turkey.<ref name=":1">{{cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-turkey-eu-idUSKCN1QA0MJ|title=Turkey condemns European parliament committee call to suspend...|date=21 February 2019|work=Reuters|access-date=21 February 2019|archive-date=11 December 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201211195612/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-turkey-eu-idUSKCN1QA0MJ|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=":2">{{cite web |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/articles/2019-02-21/turkey-faces-crucial-vote-on-eu-accession-before-local-ballot |title=Turkey Faces Crucial Vote on EU Accession Before Local Ballot |website=bloomberg.com |access-date=21 February 2019 |archive-date=21 February 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190221224251/https://www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/articles/2019-02-21/turkey-faces-crucial-vote-on-eu-accession-before-local-ballot |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=":3">{{cite web |url=https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1090402/EU-news-turkey-membership-eu-turkey-accession-latest-news |title='Change it now!' Turkey FURIOUS as EU votes to STOP accession talks |last=Perring |first=Rebecca |date=21 February 2019 |website=Express.co.uk |access-date=21 February 2019 |archive-date=21 February 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190221172550/https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1090402/EU-news-turkey-membership-eu-turkey-accession-latest-news |url-status=live }}</ref> On 13 March 2019, the ] unanimously voted for a halt to the full membership negotiations between the EU and Turkey.<ref>{{cite web |url =https://www.euronews.com/2019/03/13/european-parliament-calls-for-suspension-of-turkey-eu-accession-talks |title =European Parliament calls for suspension of Turkey EU accession talks |language =en |date =March 13, 2019 |work =Euronews |access-date =5 September 2023 |archive-date =20 August 2023 |archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20230820141533/https://www.euronews.com/2019/03/13/european-parliament-calls-for-suspension-of-turkey-eu-accession-talks |url-status =live }}</ref> On 19 May 2021, the European Parliament unanimously accepted the call for the suspension of accession negotiations between the EU and Turkey.<ref name=2019susp/> In July 2023, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan brought up Turkey's EU membership application during a NATO summit in Vilnius, linking it to ].<ref name="Huseyin Hayatsever 2023 k001">{{cite web | last=Huseyin Hayatsever | first=Ece Toksabay | title=Erdogan links Sweden's NATO membership to Turkey's EU accession | website=Reuters | date=2023-07-10 | url=https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/erdogan-links-swedens-nato-membership-turkeys-eu-accession-2023-07-10/ | access-date=2023-07-10 | archive-date=1 August 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230801081525/https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/erdogan-links-swedens-nato-membership-turkeys-eu-accession-2023-07-10/ | url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Hande Atay Alam 2023 r971">{{cite web | last=Hande Atay Alam | first=Christian Edwards | title=Erdogan links Sweden's NATO bid to Turkey joining the EU | website=CNN | date=2023-07-10 | url=https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/10/europe/erdogan-turkey-nato-eu-sweden-intl/index.html | access-date=2023-07-10 | archive-date=16 July 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230716214608/https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/10/europe/erdogan-turkey-nato-eu-sweden-intl/index.html | url-status=live }}</ref> According to ]'s data, in September 2023, 60% of Swedes said that Sweden opposes Turkey's EU membership and will not support the membership process, while 7% said that Sweden does not oppose Turkey's EU membership and will support the membership process.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.dn.se/sverige/dn-ipsos-valjarna-vill-inte-ha-turkiet-i-eu/|title=DN/Ipsos: Väljarna vill inte ha Turkiet i EU|date=2023-09-04|language=sv|publisher=Dagens Nyheter|access-date=13 September 2023|archive-date=7 September 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230907140928/https://www.dn.se/sverige/dn-ipsos-valjarna-vill-inte-ha-turkiet-i-eu/|url-status=live}}</ref>

==Negotiation progress==
===Table of chapters===
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed;"
|+Screening, chapter, clusters, & freezing dates
!]
!Screening started!!Screening completed!!Cluster Opened!!Chapter Opened!!Chapter frozen!!Chapter unfrozen!!Cluster Closed!!Chapter Closed
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 1. Free Movement of Goods
| 16 January 2006 || 24 February 2006 || – || – || 11 December 2006<ref group=C name=Council>The EU Council froze the opening of eight chapters over Turkey's rejection to open its ports and airports to traffic from Cyprus in 2006</ref> || – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 2. Freedom of Movement For Workers
| 19 July 2006 || 11 September 2006 || – || – || 8 December 2009<ref group=C name=frozen>Some of the chapters do not proceed to the next stage in the process, because they are blocked by Cyprus.</ref> || – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 3. Right of Establishment & Freedom To Provide Services
|21 November 2005 || 20 December 2005 || – || – || 11 December 2006<ref group=C name=Council/> || – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 4. Free Movement of Capital
| 25 November 2005 || 22 December 2005 || – || 19 December 2008 || – || – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 5. Public Procurement
| 7 November 2005 || 28 November 2005 || – || – || – || – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 6. Company Law
| 21 June 2006 || 20 July 2006 || – || 17 June 2008 || – || – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 7. Intellectual Property Law
| 6 February 2006 || 3 March 2006 || – || 17 June 2008 || – || – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 8. Competition Policy
| 8 November 2005 || 2 December 2005 || – || – || – || – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 9. Financial Services
| 29 March 2006 || 3 May 2006 || – || – || 11 December 2006<ref group=C name=Council/> || – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 10. Information Society & Media
| 12 June 2006 || 14 July 2006 || – || 19 December 2008 || – || – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 11. Agriculture & Rural Development
| 5 December 2005 || 26 January 2006 || – || – || 11 December 2006<ref group=C name=Council/><ref group=C name=France/><ref name=ifri/>|| – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 12. Food Safety, Veterinary & Phytosanitary Policy
| 9 March 2006 || 28 April 2006 || – || 30 June 2010 || – || – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 13. Fisheries
| 24 February 2006 || 31 March 2006 || – || – || 11 December 2006<ref group=C name=Council/> || – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 14. Transport Policy
| 26 June 2006 || 28 September 2006 || – || – || 11 December 2006<ref group=C name=Council/> || – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 15. Energy
| 15 May 2006 || 16 June 2006 || – || – || 8 December 2009<ref group=C name=frozen/> || – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 16. Taxation
| 6 June 2006 || 12 July 2006 || – || 30 June 2009 || – || – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 17. Economic & Monetary Policy
| 16 February 2006 || 23 March 2006 || – || 14 December 2015 || 25 June 2007<ref group=C name=France>France blocked some chapters from proceeding to the next stage of the process, but subsequently lifted their veto.</ref><ref name=ifri>{{cite web|url=http://www.mfa.gov.tr/relations-between-turkey-and-the-european-union.en.mfa |title=Turkey-EU Relations|work=Republic of Turkey Ministry of Foreign Affairs|access-date=7 June 2015|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20150627090859/http://www.mfa.gov.tr/relations-between-turkey-and-the-european-union.en.mfa |archive-date=27 June 2015}}</ref> || 14 December 2015<ref>{{cite news |title=Turkey expects new talks on its EU bid next month |work=BBC News |date=26 November 2015 |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34930708 |access-date=27 November 2015 |archive-date=2 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210102214645/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34930708 |url-status=live }}</ref> || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 18. Statistics
| 19 June 2006 || 18 July 2006 || – || 25 June 2007 || – || – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 19. Social Policy & Employment
| 8 February 2006 || 22 March 2006 || – || – || – || – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 20. Enterprise & Industrial Policy
| 27 March 2006 || 5 May 2006 || – || 29 March 2007 || – || – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 21. Trans-European Networks
| 30 June 2006 || 29 September 2006 || – || 19 December 2007 || – || – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 22. Regional Policy & Coordination of Structural Instruments
| 11 September 2006 || 10 October 2006 || – || 5 November 2013<ref>{{cite web|title=New EU chapter promises regional development in Turkey|url= http://www.turkishweekly.net/news/158109/new-eu-chapter-promises-regional-development-in-turkey.html |access-date=5 November 2013|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20131105084850/http://www.turkishweekly.net/news/158109/new-eu-chapter-promises-regional-development-in-turkey.html |archive-date=5 November 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=EU-Turkey membership talks in Brussels|url=http://www.kuna.net.kw/ArticleDetails.aspx?id=2342355&language=en|access-date=5 November 2013|archive-date=11 June 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200611051911/https://www.kuna.net.kw/ArticleDetails.aspx?id=2342355&language=en|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title= EU, Turkey restart membership talks | date=5 November 2013 |url= http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/eu-turkey-in-talks-for-membership.aspx?pageID=238&nID=57361&NewsCatID=351 |access-date= 5 November 2013 |archive-date= 8 November 2016 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20161108061133/http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/eu-turkey-in-talks-for-membership.aspx?pageID=238&nID=57361&NewsCatID=351 |url-status= live }}</ref> || 25 June 2007<ref group=C name=France/> || 12 February 2013 || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 23. Judiciary & Fundamental Rights
| 7 September 2006 || 13 October 2006 || – || – || 8 December 2009<ref group=C name=frozen/> || – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 24. Justice, Freedom & Security
| 23 January 2006 || 15 February 2006 || – || – || 8 December 2009<ref group=C name=frozen/> || – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 25. Science & Research
| 20 October 2005 || 14 November 2005 || – || 12 June 2006 || – || – || – || '''12 June 2006'''
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 26. Education & Culture
| 26 October 2005 || 16 November 2005 || – || – || 8 December 2009<ref group=C name=frozen/> || – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 27. Environment & Climate Change
| 3 April 2006 || 2 June 2006 || – || – || 21 December 2009<ref group=C name=Council/> || – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 28. Consumer & Health Protection
| 8 June 2006 || 11 July 2006 || – || – || 19 December 2007 || – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 29. Customs Union
| 31 January 2006 || 14 March 2006 || – || – || 11 December 2006<ref group=C name=Council/> || – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 30. External Relations
| 10 July 2006 || 13 September 2006 || – || 11 December 2006<ref group=C name=Council/> || – || – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 31. Foreign, Security & Defence Policy
| 14 September 2006 || 6 October 2006 || – || – || 8 December 2009<ref group=C name=frozen/> || – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 32. Financial Control
| 18 May 2006 || 30 June 2006 || – || 26 July 2007 || – || – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 33. Financial & Budgetary Provisions
| 6 September 2006 || 4 October 2006 || – || 30 June 2016<ref>{{cite web |title=Accession conference with Turkey: Talks opened on Chapter 33 – Financial and budgetary provisions |url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2016/06/30-turkey-accession-conference/ |access-date=30 June 2016 |archive-date=2 August 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170802210740/http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2016/06/30-turkey-accession-conference/ |url-status=live }}</ref> || 25 June 2007<ref group=C name=France/><ref name=ifri/> || 18 March 2016 || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 34. Institutions
| – || – || – || – || – || – || – || –
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 35. Other Issues
| – || – || – || – || – || – || – || –
|-
|Progress
|33 of 33
|33 of 33
|0 of 13
|16 of 33
|17 of 33
|3 of 17
|1 of 33
|1 of 13
|-
| colspan="9" | <references group=C />
|}

===Timeline of chapters===
{{center|
{{#tag:timeline|
DateFormat = dd/mm/yyyy
ImageSize = width:1080 height:auto barincrement:20
PlotArea = left:20 right:20 bottom:50 top:20

Colors =
id:screening value:yellow legend:Period_of_screening
id:frozen value:red legend:Period_of_chapter_being_frozen
id:open value:blue legend:Period_of_chapter_being_open
id:closed value:rgb(0.5,1,0) legend:Period_of_chapter_provisionally_closed
id:lightgray value:gray(0.92)
id:gray value:gray(0.7)

Define $end = {{#time: d/m/Y }}
Period = from:17/12/2004 till:$end
TimeAxis = orientation:horizontal format:yyyy
ScaleMajor = unit:year increment:1 start:2005 gridcolor:gray
ScaleMinor = unit:month increment:1 start:2005 gridcolor:lightgray
AlignBars = justify
Legend = left:25 top:20

BarData =
bar:Free_Movement_of_Goods
bar:Freedom_of_Movement_for_Workers
bar:Right_of_Establishment_&_Freedom_to_Provide_Services
bar:Free_Movement_of_Capital
bar:Public_Procurement
bar:Company_Law
bar:Intellectual_Property_Law
bar:Competition_Policy
bar:Financial_Services
bar:Information_Society_&_Media
bar:Agriculture_&_Rural_Development
bar:Food_Safety_Veterinary_&_Phytosanitary_Policy
bar:Fisheries
bar:Transport_Policy
bar:Energy
bar:Taxation
bar:Economic_&_Monetary_Policy
bar:Statistics
bar:Social_Policy_&_Employment
bar:Enterprise_&_Industrial_Policy
bar:Trans-European_Networks
bar:Regional_Policy_&_Coordination_of_Structural_Instruments
bar:Judiciary_&_Fundamental_Rights
bar:Justice_Freedom_&_Security
bar:Science_&_Research
bar:Education_&_Culture
bar:Environment_&_Climate_Change
bar:Consumer_&_Health_Protection
bar:Customs_Union
bar:External_Relations
bar:Foreign_Security_&_Defence_Policy
bar:Financial_Control
bar:Financial_&_Budgetary_Provisions
bar:Institutions
bar:Other_Issues

PlotData =
width:15 fontsize:M textcolor:black anchor:from align:left

bar:Free_Movement_of_Goods color:screening from:16/01/2006 till:24/02/2006
color:frozen from:11/12/2006 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Free_Movement_of_Goods
bar:Freedom_of_Movement_for_Workers color:screening from:19/07/2006 till:11/09/2006
color:frozen from:08/12/2009 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Freedom_of_Movement_for_Workers
bar:Right_of_Establishment_&_Freedom_to_Provide_Services color:screening from:21/11/2005 till:20/12/2005
color:frozen from:11/12/2006 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Right_of_Establishment_&_Freedom_to_Provide_Services
bar:Free_Movement_of_Capital color:screening from:25/11/2005 till:22/12/2005
color:open from:19/12/2008 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Free_Movement_of_Capital
bar:Public_Procurement color:screening from:07/11/2005 till:28/11/2005
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Public_Procurement
bar:Company_Law color:screening from:21/06/2006 till:20/07/2006
color:open from:17/06/2008 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Company_Law
bar:Intellectual_Property_Law color:screening from:06/02/2006 till:03/03/2006
color:open from:17/06/2008 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Intellectual_Property_Law
bar:Competition_Policy color:screening from:08/11/2005 till:02/12/2005
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Competition_Policy
bar:Financial_Services color:screening from:29/03/2006 till:03/05/2006
color:frozen from:11/12/2006 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Financial_Services
bar:Information_Society_&_Media color:screening from:12/06/2006 till:14/07/2006
color:open from:19/12/2008 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Information_Society_&_Media
bar:Agriculture_&_Rural_Development color:screening from:05/12/2005 till:26/01/2006
color:frozen from:11/12/2006 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Agriculture_&_Rural_Development
bar:Food_Safety_Veterinary_&_Phytosanitary_Policy color:screening from:09/03/2006 till:28/04/2006
color:open from:30/06/2010 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Food_Safety,_Veterinary_&_Phytosanitary_Policy
bar:Fisheries color:screening from:24/02/2006 till:31/03/2006
color:frozen from:11/12/2006 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Fisheries
bar:Transport_Policy color:screening from:26/06/2006 till:28/09/2006
color:frozen from:11/12/2006 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Transport_Policy
bar:Energy color:screening from:15/05/2006 till:16/06/2006
color:frozen from:08/12/2009 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Energy
bar:Taxation color:screening from:06/06/2006 till:12/07/2006
color:open from:30/06/2009 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Taxation
bar:Economic_&_Monetary_Policy color:screening from:16/02/2006 till:23/03/2006
color:frozen from:25/06/2007 till:14/12/2015
color:open from:14/12/2015 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Economic_&_Monetary_Policy
bar:Statistics color:screening from:19/06/2006 till:18/07/2006
color:open from:25/06/2007 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Statistics
bar:Social_Policy_&_Employment color:screening from:08/02/2006 till:22/03/2006
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Social_Policy_&_Employment
bar:Enterprise_&_Industrial_Policy color:screening from:27/03/2006 till:05/05/2006
color:open from:29/03/2007 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Enterprise_&_Industrial_Policy
bar:Trans-European_Networks color:screening from:30/06/2006 till:29/09/2006
color:open from:19/12/2007 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Trans-European_Networks
bar:Regional_Policy_&_Coordination_of_Structural_Instruments color:screening from:11/09/2006 till:10/10/2006
color:frozen from:25/06/2007 till:12/02/2013
color:open from:05/11/2013 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Regional_Policy_&_Coordination_of_Structural_Instruments
bar:Judiciary_&_Fundamental_Rights color:screening from:07/09/2006 till:13/10/2006
color:frozen from:08/12/2009 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Judiciary_&_Fundamental_Rights
bar:Justice_Freedom_&_Security color:screening from:23/01/2006 till:15/02/2006
color:frozen from:08/12/2009 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Justice,_Freedom_&_Security
bar:Science_&_Research color:screening from:20/10/2005 till:14/11/2005
color:open from:12/06/2006 till:12/06/2006
color:closed from:13/06/2006 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Science_&_Research
bar:Education_&_Culture color:screening from:26/10/2005 till:16/11/2005
color:frozen from:08/12/2009 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Education_&_Culture
bar:Environment_&_Climate_Change color:screening from:03/04/2006 till:02/06/2006
color:open from:21/12/2009 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Environment_&_Climate_Change
bar:Consumer_&_Health_Protection color:screening from:08/06/2006 till:11/07/2006
color:open from:19/12/2007 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Consumer_&_Health_Protection
bar:Customs_Union color:screening from:31/01/2006 till:14/03/2006
color:frozen from:11/12/2006 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Customs_Union
bar:External_Relations color:screening from:10/07/2006 till:13/09/2006
color:frozen from:11/12/2006 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:External_Relations
bar:Foreign_Security_&_Defence_Policy color:screening from:14/09/2006 till:06/10/2006
color:frozen from:08/12/2009 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Foreign,_Security_&_Defence_Policy
bar:Financial_Control color:screening from:18/05/2006 till:30/06/2006
color:open from:26/07/2007 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Financial_Control
bar:Financial_&_Budgetary_Provisions color:screening from:06/09/2006 till:04/10/2006
color:frozen from:25/06/2007 till:18/03/2016
color:open from:30/06/2016 till:end
at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Financial_&_Budgetary_Provisions
bar:Institutions at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Institutions
bar:Other_Issues at:end align:right shift:(0,-4) text:Other_Issues
}}
}}

===Report history for Turkey's ability to assume the obligations of EU membership===
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed sortable" style="text-align:left"
|+ class="nowrap" | Report history 2003–2004
|-
| colspan=3 |
{{legend-inline|#f3f|totally incompatible}}
{{legend-inline|#f00|early stage}}
{{legend-inline|#ffa500|considerable efforts needed}}
{{legend-inline|#FFD27F|some level of preparation}}
{{legend-inline|#ff5|further efforts needed}}
{{legend-inline|#FFFFE0|moderately advanced}}
{{legend-inline|#cfc|good level of preparation}}
{{legend-inline|#7fff00|advanced}}
{{legend-inline|#32cd32|well advanced}}

<br/>
† This chart does not indicate chapters which have been provisionally closed and/or chapters which have been frozen.

‡ Prior to the ], there were thirty-one chapters of the ''acquis communautaire''.
|-
!]!!2003<ref>{{cite web |title=2003 Regular Report on Turkey's progress towards accession |url=https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/default/files/archives/pdf/key_documents/2003/rr_tk_final_en.pdf |publisher=European Commission |date=29 May 2003 |access-date=16 May 2021 |location=Brussels |language=English |archive-date=11 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210411102438/https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/default/files/archives/pdf/key_documents/2003/rr_tk_final_en.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>
!2004<ref>{{cite web |title=2004 Regular Report on Turkey's progress towards accession |url=https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2004_2009/documents/sec/com_sec(2004)1201_/com_sec(2004)1201_en.pdf |publisher=European Commission |access-date=16 May 2021 |location=Brussels |language=English |date=10 June 2004 |archive-date=10 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210510144350/https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2004_2009/documents/sec/com_sec(2004)1201_/com_sec(2004)1201_en.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 1. Free Movement of Goods ||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 2. Freedom Movement of Persons ||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 3. Freedom to Provide Services ||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 4. Free Movement of Capital ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 5. Company Law ||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 6. Competition Policy ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 7. Agriculture ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 8. Fisheries ||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 9. Transport Policy ||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 10. Taxation ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 11. Economic and Monetary Union ||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 12. Statistics ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 13. Social Policy and Employment ||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 14. Energy ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 15. Industrial Policy ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 16. Small and Medium-sized Companies ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 17. Science and Research ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 18. Education and Training ||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 19. Telecommunication and Information Technologies ||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 20. Culture and Audio-visual Policy ||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 21. Regional Policy and Coordination of Structural Instruments ||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 22. Environment ||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 23. Consumer and Health Protection ||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 24. Cooperation in the Field of Justice and Home Affairs ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 25. Customs Union ||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 26. External Relations ||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 27. Common Foreign and Security Policy ||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 28. Financial Control ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 29. Financial and Budgetary Provisions ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 30. Institutions ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 31. Others ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed
|-
| colspan=3|
{{legend-inline|#f3f|totally incompatible}}
{{legend-inline|#f00|early stage}}
{{legend-inline|#ffa500|considerable efforts needed}}
{{legend-inline|#FFD27F|some level of preparation}}
{{legend-inline|#ff5|further efforts needed}}
{{legend-inline|#FFFFE0|moderately advanced}}
{{legend-inline|#cfc|good level of preparation}}
{{legend-inline|#7fff00|advanced}}
{{legend-inline|#32cd32|well advanced}}

<br/>
† This chart does not indicate chapters which have been provisionally closed and/or chapters which have been frozen.

‡ Prior to the ] there were thirty-one chapters of the ''acquis communautaire''.
|}
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed sortable" style="text-align:left"
|+ class="nowrap" | Report history 2005–2024
|-
| colspan="21" |
{{legend-inline|#f3f|totally incompatible}}
{{legend-inline|#f00|early stage}}
{{legend-inline|#ffa500|considerable efforts needed}}
{{legend-inline|#FFD27F|some level of preparation}}
{{legend-inline|#ff5|further efforts needed}}
{{legend-inline|#FFFFE0|moderately advanced}}
{{legend-inline|#cfc|good level of preparation}}
{{legend-inline|#7fff00|advanced}}
{{legend-inline|#32cd32|well advanced}}

<br/>
† This chart does not indicate chapters which have been provisionally closed and/or chapters which have been frozen.

‡ After the ] four more chapters were added and/or restructured, bringing the total number of ''acquis communautaire'' chapters to 35.
|-
!Clusters
!]
!2005<ref>{{cite web |title=Turkey 2005 Progress Report |url=https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/2/2005/EN/2-2005-1426-EN-1-0.pdf |publisher=European Commission |location=Brussels |language=English |date=9 November 2005 |access-date=16 May 2021 |archive-date=25 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210225001919/https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/2/2005/EN/2-2005-1426-EN-1-0.Pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>
!2006<ref>{{cite web |title=Turkey 2006 Progress Report |url=https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/default/files/pdf/key_documents/2006/nov/tr_sec_1390_en.pdf |publisher=European Commission |location=Brussels |language=English |date=8 November 2006 |access-date=16 May 2021 |archive-date=8 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210508224707/https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/default/files/pdf/key_documents/2006/nov/tr_sec_1390_en.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>
!2007<ref>{{cite web |title=Turkey 2007 Progress Report |url=https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/67cb3dc8-894a-4f63-a3ea-5065da936c67 |website=Publications Office of the EU |publisher=European Commission |location=Brussels |language=English |date=11 June 2007 |access-date=16 May 2021 |archive-date=15 August 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210815000114/https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/67cb3dc8-894a-4f63-a3ea-5065da936c67 |url-status=live }}</ref>
!2008<ref>{{cite web |title=Turkey 2008 Progress Report |url=https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/press_corner/key-documents/reports_nov_2008/turkey_progress_report_en.pdf |publisher=European Commission |location=Brussels |language=English |date=5 November 2008 |access-date=17 May 2021 |archive-date=6 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210506015222/https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/press_corner/key-documents/reports_nov_2008/turkey_progress_report_en.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>
!2009<ref>{{cite web |title=Turkey 2009 Progress Report |url=https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/key_documents/2009/tr_rapport_2009_en.pdf |publisher=European Commission |location=Brussels |language=English |date=14 October 2009 |access-date=7 June 2021 |archive-date=6 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210506021836/https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/key_documents/2009/tr_rapport_2009_en.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>
!2010<ref>{{cite web |title=Turkey 2010 Progress Report |url=https://www.ab.gov.tr/files/AB_Iliskileri/Tur_En_Realitons/Progress/turkey_progress_report_2010.pdf |publisher=European Commission |location=Brussels |language=English |date=9 November 2010 |access-date=7 June 2021 |archive-date=1 March 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210301133308/https://ab.gov.tr/files/AB_Iliskileri/Tur_En_Realitons/Progress/turkey_progress_report_2010.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>
!2011<ref>{{cite web |title=Turkey 2011 Progress Report |url=https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/key_documents/2011/package/tr_rapport_2011_en.pdf |publisher=European Commission |location=Brussels |language=English |date=12 October 2011 |access-date=24 August 2021 |archive-date=12 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210412114703/https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/key_documents/2011/package/tr_rapport_2011_en.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>
!2012<ref>{{cite web |title=Turkey 2012 Progress Report |url=https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/key_documents/2012/package/tr_rapport_2012_en.pdf |publisher=European Commission |location=Brussels |language=English |date=10 October 2012 |access-date=28 August 2021 |archive-date=14 March 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170314154552/https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/key_documents/2012/package/tr_rapport_2012_en.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>
!2013<ref>{{cite web |title=Turkey 2013 Progress Report |url=https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/key_documents/2012/package/tr_rapport_2012_en.pdf |publisher=European Commission |location=Brussels |language=English |date=16 October 2013 |access-date=28 August 2021 |archive-date=14 March 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170314154552/https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/key_documents/2012/package/tr_rapport_2012_en.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>
!2014<ref>{{cite web |title=Turkey 2014 Progress Report |url=https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/key_documents/2014/20141008-turkey-progress-report_en.pdf |publisher=European Commission |location=Brussels |language=English |date=8 October 2014 |access-date=28 August 2021 |archive-date=3 July 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170703112152/https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/key_documents/2014/20141008-turkey-progress-report_en.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>
!2015<ref>{{cite web |title=Turkey 2015 Report |url=http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2015/20151110_report_turkey.pdf |publisher=European Commission |date=10 November 2015 |access-date=28 August 2021 |location=Brussels |language=English |archive-date=23 November 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161123042721/http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2015/20151110_report_turkey.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>
!2016<ref>{{cite web |title=Turkey 2016 Report |url=https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/key_documents/2016/20161109_report_turkey.pdf |publisher=European Commission |date=9 November 2016 |access-date=16 May 2021 |location=Brussels |language=English |archive-date=18 December 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201218132551/https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/key_documents/2016/20161109_report_turkey.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>
!2018<ref>{{cite web |title=Turkey 2018 Report |url=https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/default/files/20180417-turkey-report.pdf |publisher=European Commission |date=17 April 2018 |access-date=28 August 2021 |location=Brussels |language=English |archive-date=28 August 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210828082140/https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/default/files/20180417-turkey-report.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>
!2019<ref>{{cite web |title=Turkey 2019 Report |url=https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/20190529-turkey-report.pdf |publisher=European Commission |date=29 May 2019 |access-date=16 May 2021 |location=Brussels |language=English |archive-date=12 November 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112033149/https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/20190529-turkey-report.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>
!2020<ref>{{cite web |title=Turkey 2020 Report |url=https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/turkey_report_2020.pdf |publisher=European Commission |date=6 October 2020 |access-date=16 May 2021 |location=Brussels |language=English |archive-date=3 November 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201103090805/https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/turkey_report_2020.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>
!2021<ref>{{cite web |title=Turkey 2021 Report |url=https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/system/files/2021-10/Turkey%202021%20report.PDF |publisher=European Commission |date=19 October 2021 |access-date=3 February 2022 |location=Brussels |language=English |archive-date=21 January 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220121110007/https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/system/files/2021-10/Turkey%202021%20report.PDF |url-status=live }}</ref>
!2022<ref name="TurkeyReport2022">{{cite web |url=https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/ccedfba1-0ea4-4220-9f94-ae50c7fd0302_en?filename=T%C3%BCrkiye%20Report%202022.pdf |title=Turkey Report 2022 |publisher=European Commission |access-date=13 October 2022 |archive-date=22 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230122184638/https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-10/T%C3%BCrkiye%20Report%202022.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>
!2023<ref name="TurkeyReport2023">{{cite web |url=https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/eb90aefd-897b-43e9-8373-bf59c239217f_en?filename=SWD_2023_696%20T%C3%BCrkiye%20report.pdf |title=Turkey Report 2023 |publisher=European Commission |access-date=8 November 2023 |archive-date=27 February 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240227104732/https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/eb90aefd-897b-43e9-8373-bf59c239217f_en?filename=SWD_2023_696%20T%C3%BCrkiye%20report.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>
!2024<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-10-30 |title=Commission Staff Working Document: Türkiye 2024 Report |url=https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/8010c4db-6ef8-4c85-aa06-814408921c89_en?filename=T%C3%BCrkiye%20Report%202024.pdf |access-date=2024-10-30 |website=European Neighbourhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations (DG NEAR)}}</ref>
|-
|rowspan="5"| Cluster 1: Fundamentals
| style="text-align:left;" | 23. Judiciary and Fundamental Rights ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage
|
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 24. Justice, Freedom, and Security ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced
|
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 5. Public Procurement ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced
|
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 18. Statistics ||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#7fff00;"|Advanced||style="background:#7fff00;"|Advanced||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#7fff00;"|Advanced||style="background:#7fff00;"|Advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced
|
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 32. Financial Control ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation
|
|-
|rowspan="9"| Cluster 2: Internal Market
| style="text-align:left;" | 1. Free Movement of Goods ||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#7fff00;"|Advanced||style="background:#7fff00;"|Advanced||style="background:#7fff00;"|Advanced||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation
|
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 2. Freedom of Movement for Workers ||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage
|
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 3. Right of Establishment and Freedom to Provide Services ||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage
|
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 4. Free Movement of Capital ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced
|
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 6. Company Law ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced
|
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 7. Intellectual Property Law ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#7fff00;"|Advanced||style="background:#7fff00;"|Advanced||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation
|
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 8. Competition Policy ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation
|
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 9. Financial Services ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#7fff00;"|Advanced||style="background:#7fff00;"|Advanced||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation
|
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 28. Consumer and Health Protection ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation
|
|-
|rowspan="8"| Cluster 3: Competitiveness and inclusive growth
| style="text-align:left;" | 10. Information Society and Media ||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation
|
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 16. Taxation ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced
|
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 17. Economic and Monetary Policy ||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#7fff00;"|Advanced||style="background:#7fff00;"|Advanced||style="background:#7fff00;"|Advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced|| style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation
|
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 19. Social Policy and Employment ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation
|
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 20. Enterprise and Industrial Policy ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#7fff00;"|Advanced||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced|| style="background:#7fff00;"|Advanced||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced
|
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 25. Science and Research ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced
|
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 26. Education and Culture ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced
|
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 29. Customs Union ||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#7fff00;"|Advanced||style="background:#7fff00;"|Advanced||style="background:#7fff00;"|Advanced||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation
|
|-
|rowspan="4"| Cluster 4: Green Agenda and Sustainable Connectivity
| style="text-align:left;" | 14. Transport Policy ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced
|
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 15. Energy ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#7fff00;"|Advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced
|
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 21. Trans-European Networks ||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#7fff00;"|Advanced||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#7fff00;"|Advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#7fff00;"|Advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced||style="background:#32cd32;"|Well advanced
|
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 27. Environment and Climate Change ||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation
|
|-
|rowspan="5"| Cluster 5: Resources, Agriculture and Cohesion
| style="text-align:left;" | 11. Agriculture and Rural Development ||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation
|
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 12. Food Safety, Veterinary, and Phytosanitary Policy ||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation
|
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 13. Fisheries ||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced
|
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 22. Regional Policy and Coordination of Structural Instruments ||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ffa500;"|Considerable efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced
|
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 33. Financial and Budgetary Provisions ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#f00;"|Early stage||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation
|
|-
|rowspan="2"| Cluster 6: External Relations
| style="text-align:left;" | 30. External Relations ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#7fff00;"|Advanced||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#cfc;"|Good level of preparation||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced
|
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 31. Foreign, Security, and Defence Policy ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFFFE0;"|Moderately advanced||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation||style="background:#FFD27F;"|Some level of preparation
|
|-
|rowspan="2"| Others
| style="text-align:left;" | 34. Institutions ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed
|
|-
| style="text-align:left;" | 35. Other Issues ||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed||style="background:#ff5;"|Further efforts needed
|
|-
| colspan=20|
{{legend-inline|#f3f|totally incompatible}}
{{legend-inline|#f00|early stage}}
{{legend-inline|#ffa500|considerable efforts needed}}
{{legend-inline|#FFD27F|some level of preparation}}
{{legend-inline|#ff5|further efforts needed}}
{{legend-inline|#FFFFE0|moderately advanced}}
{{legend-inline|#cfc|good level of preparation}}
{{legend-inline|#7fff00|advanced}}
{{legend-inline|#32cd32|well advanced}}

<br/>
† This chart does not indicate chapters which have been provisionally closed and/or chapters which have been frozen.

‡ After the ], four more chapters were added and/or restructured, bringing the total number of ''acquis communautaire'' chapters to 35.
|
|}

===Pre-accession support to Turkey===
{{main article|European Union–Turkey relations#EU pre-accession support to Turkey}}
The European Commission's long-term budget proposal for the 2021-2027 period released in May 2018 included pre-accession funding for a Western Balkan Strategy for further enlargement, but omitted Turkey.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://ahvalnews.com/eu-turkey/eu-plans-cut-financial-assistance-turkey|title=EU plans to cut financial assistance to Turkey|publisher=Ahval|date=6 May 2018|access-date=6 May 2018|archive-date=26 December 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191226085521/https://ahvalnews.com/eu-turkey/eu-plans-cut-financial-assistance-turkey}}</ref>

==Expected impact of joining==

===Effect upon the EU===
] (dark green)]]

The problem of Turkey's membership of the EU is compounded by conflicting views as to what the EU should ultimately become.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cdu.de/en/doc/Friends_of_Europe_Turkey.pdf:|title=International|work=Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands|access-date=7 June 2015|archive-date=2 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210102215558/http://www.cdu.de/international|url-status=live}}</ref> This has played a significant role in the debate, due in part to the ] and the fact that as a result of this the ] and the EU overall is more federalised on both ], ] and political levels than it was at the time of Turkey's application or at the time that Turkey was accepted as a candidate.<ref>{{Cite news|date=26 May 2012|title=The choice|newspaper=The Economist|url=https://www.economist.com/leaders/2012/05/26/the-choice|access-date=1 March 2021|issn=0013-0613|archive-date=15 April 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210415060412/https://www.economist.com/leaders/2012/05/26/the-choice|url-status=live}}</ref> Generally those members of the EU who support a rights-based free trade bloc do not oppose Turkey as adamantly as those who support a broader political union. The latter, in particular, were concerned that unification would be frustrated and the ] threatened by Turkey's inclusion.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.euobserver.com/political/29016:|title=Van Rompuy: 'Turkey will never be part of Europe'|date=18 November 2009|access-date=7 June 2015|archive-date=2 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210102231425/https://euobserver.com/political/29016|url-status=live}}</ref>

Proponents of Turkey's membership argue that Turkey's geographical location will contribute to peace. According to the Swedish foreign minister, ], "the accession of Turkey would give the EU a decisive role for stability in the eastern part of the Mediterranean and the Black Sea, which is clearly in the strategic interest of Europe".<ref name="ihtbildt">{{cite news|last=Ekman|first=Ivar|title=Top Swedish official backs Turkey for EU|work=]|date=11 December 2006|url=http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/12/11/news/sweden.php|access-date=3 July 2007|archive-date=27 January 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080127045850/http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/12/11/news/sweden.php|url-status=live}}</ref> ] is a key supporter for Turkey's bid to join the EU,<ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.todayszaman.com/national_polish-president-very-optimistic-about-turkeys-eu-accession-bid_101061.html |title=Polish president 'very optimistic' about Turkey's EU accession bid |work=TodaysZaman |access-date=7 June 2015 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20150402100339/http://www.todayszaman.com/national_polish-president-very-optimistic-about-turkeys-eu-accession-bid_101061.html |archive-date=2 April 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkeys-eu-bid-hurt-by-turmoil---polish-president.aspx?pageID=438&n=turkeys-eu-bid-hurt-by-turmoil---polish-president-2008-04-11 |title= Economy – Turkey's EU bid hurt by turmoil – Polish president |access-date= 7 June 2015 |archive-date= 8 November 2016 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20161108061143/http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkeys-eu-bid-hurt-by-turmoil---polish-president.aspx?pageID=438&n=turkeys-eu-bid-hurt-by-turmoil---polish-president-2008-04-11 |url-status= live }}</ref> while the United Kingdom has expressed support previously, but not since ].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/09/27/boris-johnson-says-britain-will-now-help-turkey-join-eu-despite/|title=Boris Johnson says Britain will now help Turkey join EU despite using prospect to help win referendum|first=Steven|last=Swinford|newspaper=The Telegraph|date=27 September 2016|via=www.telegraph.co.uk|access-date=2 April 2018|archive-date=24 December 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201224115410/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/09/27/boris-johnson-says-britain-will-now-help-turkey-join-eu-despite/|url-status=live}}</ref>

Upon joining the EU, Turkey's 83 million inhabitants would bestow the largest number of ] in the ].<ref name="economist2"/> Turkey now has a ] than Germany. However, a single country can only hold a maximum of 96 seats in the European Parliament.

], ], ] and ] ] will deliver natural gas from the ] basin to the EU member states.]]

Turkey's membership would also affect future enlargement plans, especially the number of nations seeking EU membership,<ref name="economist2"/> grounds on which ] has opposed Turkey's admission. Giscard has suggested that it would lead to demands for accession by ]. ] is already rejected for "not being a European country"; Turkey, unlike Morocco, has 3% of its ]. The vast majority of its population lives in the Asian side of the country. On the other hand, the country's largest city, ], lies mostly in Europe. On the other hand, ], which is geographically located in Asia, joined the European Union in 2004. French President ] stated in January 2007 that "enlarging Europe with no limit risks destroying European political union, and that I do not accept ... I want to say that Europe must give itself borders, that not all countries have a vocation to become members of Europe, beginning with Turkey which has no place inside the European Union."<ref name="sarkozyquote">{{cite web|url= http://www.turkishpress.com/news.asp?id=159133 |title=Turkey has no place in EU: Sarkozy|access-date=13 April 2007|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20070706021958/http://www.turkishpress.com/news.asp?id=159133 |archive-date=6 July 2007}}</ref>

EU member states must unanimously agree on Turkey's membership for the Turkish accession to be successful. A number of nations may oppose it; notably ];{{citation needed|date=December 2017}} Germany (former chancellor ] has long rejected Turkey's accession bid, and has proposed a "]" instead);<ref>{{cite web|url=http://english.pravda.ru/news/world/29-03-2010/112764-merkel-0/|title=Germany's Merkel Opposed to Turkey's Full EU Membership|work=English pravda.ru|date=29 March 2010|access-date=7 June 2015|archive-date=29 November 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141129034232/http://english.pravda.ru/news/world/29-03-2010/112764-merkel-0/|url-status=live}}</ref> and France (where some{{who|date=December 2017}} are anxious at the prospect of a new wave of Muslim immigrants, given the country's already large Muslim community).<ref>Islam is the religion of 5% to 10% of French citizens. {{cite news |first=Molly |last=Moore |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/28/AR2008042802560.html |title=In France, Prisons Filled With Muslims |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=29 April 2008 |access-date=23 November 2021 |archive-date=16 October 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111016100458/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/28/AR2008042802560.html |url-status=live }}</ref>

Negotiations to remove the French constitutional requirement for a compulsory referendum on all EU accessions after Croatia resulted in a new proposal to require a compulsory referendum on the accession of any country with a population of more than 5% of the EU's total population; this clause would mainly apply to ] and ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.euractiv.com/en/enlargement/french-parliament-strikes-blow-turkish-eu-bid/article-172867|title=French Parliament strikes blow to Turkish EU bid|work=EurActiv – EU News & policy debates, across languages|access-date=7 June 2015|archive-date=6 September 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170906034942/http://www.euractiv.com/en/enlargement/french-parliament-strikes-blow-turkish-eu-bid/article-172867}}</ref>

The current situation according to the French constitution is as follows: if {{frac|3|5}} of the delegates (from the Senate and the Parliament) agree to the accession of Turkey, there will be no referendum.

===Benefits to Turkey===
Upon accession to the EU, Turkey expects to receive economic development aid.<ref name="50years-intereconomics">{{cite web |title=Turkey and the EU: Issues and Challenges |url=https://50years.intereconomics.eu/turkey-and-the-eu-issues-and-challenges.html |website=50years.intereconomics.eu |access-date=29 November 2019 |date=2004 |archive-date=2 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210102213953/https://50years.intereconomics.eu/turkey-and-the-eu-issues-and-challenges.html |url-status=live }}</ref> There is also an expectation that there will be an increase in European foreign investment in the Turkish economy, further driving economic growth.<ref name="50years-intereconomics"/> During potential economic crisis events, Turkey could benefit from EU assistance.<ref>{{cite web |last=Flam |first=Harry |title=Turkey and the EU: Politics and Economics of Accession. Seminar Paper 718 |url=https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo_wp893.pdf |publisher=Institute for International Economic Studies, Stockholm University |date=March 2003 |access-date=29 November 2019 |archive-date=2 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210102220019/https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo_wp893.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>

Free movement of people across the EU will give many Turkish people the opportunity to migrate to other parts of Europe in search of work, or a higher standard of living. The option of migration out of Turkey will inevitably ease tensions in the east of the country, as the prospect of a better standard of living will tend to cool separatist tendencies.{{Which|date=January 2022}} However, there have been problems concerning irregular transit migration through Turkey to the EU.<ref>{{cite report |last=İçduygu |first=Ahmet |title=The Irregular Migration Corridor between the EU and Turkey: Is it Possible to Block it with a Readmission Agreement? |publisher=European University Institute |date=2011 |hdl=1814/17844 |hdl-access=free}}</ref>

Some secularists in Turkey envisage that the accession of Turkey will contribute to the spread of secular western values in Turkey. Conversely, some non-secularists in Turkey envisage that accession will contribute to the further growth and acceptance of Islam in Europe.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Yukleyen |first=Ahmet |title=Compatibility of "Islam" and "Europe": Turkey's EU Accession |journal=Insight Turkey |volume=11 |issue=1 |date=2009}}</ref> The EU accession bid has stimulated Turkey's political and legal reforms and intensified the democratisation process.<ref>{{cite book |last=Arin |first=Kubilay Yado |title=The AKP's foreign policy: Turkey's reorientation from the West to the East |date=2013 |publisher=Wissenschaftlicher Verlag |location=Berlin |isbn=978-3-86573-719-9 |pages=57–84}}</ref>

Given Turkey's large and growing population, Turkey will have a correspondingly large representation in the European Parliament (2nd and equal with Germany, with 96 seats in EU parliament). This will give Turkey a strong direct influence over EU policies.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Bahhouth |first1=Victor |last2=Ziemnowicz |first2=Christopher |title=Meeting the Global Challenges of Doing Business in the Five Candidate Countries on the Road to Join the European Union |journal=Journal of the Knowledge Economy |date=March 2018 |volume=10 |issue=3 |pages=1297–1318 |doi=10.1007/s13132-018-0531-3 |s2cid=158074120 |quote=It would potentially shift the balance of power within the EU having the largest influence after Germany.}}</ref>

==Turkish membership issues==

===Economy===
{{Main|Economy of Turkey}}
{{See also|European Union–Turkey Customs Union}}

] and the skyline of ] business district from the ] ] in ], the largest city and economic capital of Turkey, and the former capital of the ] (330–395), ] (395–1204 and 1261–1453), ] (1204–1261) and ] (1453–1922) Empires.]]

Turkey has the world's ]<ref name="IMF-WEO">{{cite web|url=https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2021/April/weo-report?c=186,&s=NGDPD,PPPGDP,NGDPDPC,PPPPC,&sy=2010&ey=2021&ssm=0&scsm=1&scc=0&ssd=1&ssc=0&sic=0&sort=country&ds=.&br=1|title=Report for Selected Countries and Subjects|publisher=IMF World Economic Outlook Database, April 2021|access-date=11 April 2021|archive-date=11 April 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210411104315/https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2021/April/weo-report?c=186,&s=NGDPD,PPPGDP,NGDPDPC,PPPPC,&sy=2010&ey=2021&ssm=0&scsm=1&scc=0&ssd=1&ssc=0&sic=0&sort=country&ds=.&br=1|url-status=live}}</ref> and ].<ref name="IMF-WEO"/> The country is a founding member of the ] and the ].

{{Multiple image
|align =left
|direction=vertical
|width =140
|image1=New_Beko_logo.svg
|caption1=
|image2=Vestel logo.svg
|caption2=] and ] are among the largest producers of ] and ] in Europe.
}}

Turkey has taken advantage of a ], signed in 1995, to increase its industrial production destined for exports, while at the same time benefiting from EU-origin foreign investment into the country.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2006/05/03/000016406_20060503112446/Rendered/PDF/wps3908.pdf |title=Turkey's evolving trade integration into Pan-European markets |last1=Kaminski |first1=Bartolomiej |last2=Ng |first2=Francis |publisher=World Bank |access-date=27 December 2006 |date=1 May 2006 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20070614030216/http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2006/05/03/000016406_20060503112446/Rendered/PDF/wps3908.pdf |archive-date=14 June 2007 }}</ref> In 2008, Turkey's exports reached US$141.8&nbsp;billion<ref name=CIAFactbook>{{cite web|url= https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/turkey/|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20210110073821/https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/turkey|archive-date= 10 January 2021|title=The World Factbook|access-date=7 June 2015}}</ref> (main export partners: Germany 11.2%, UK 8%, Italy 6.95%, France 5.6%, Spain 4.3%, US 3.88%; total EU exports 56.5%.) However, larger imports amounting to about US$204.8 billion<ref name=CIAFactbook/> threaten the balance of trade (main import partners: Russia 13.8%, Germany 10.3%, China 7.8%, Italy 6%, USA 4.8%, France 4.6%, Iran 3.9%, UK 3.2%; total EU imports 40.4%; total Asia imports 27%).<ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.gumrukler.gov.tr/ww3/?cid=400000|title=2006–2007 Seçilmiş Ülkeler İstatistikleri|publisher=Gümrükler Genel Müdürlüğü|access-date=12 March 2008|language=tr|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080208212356/http://www.gumrukler.gov.tr/ww3/?cid=400000|archive-date=8 February 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90778/90858/90863/6331298.html|title=Turkey puts 2008 export target at 125 bln dollars|work=Xinhua|publisher=People's Daily Online|access-date=2 January 2008|date=2 January 2008|archive-date=8 October 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121008115126/http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90778/90858/90863/6331298.html|url-status=live}}</ref>

The opening of talks regarding the Economic and Monetary Policy ] chapter of Turkey's accession bid was expected to begin in June 2007, but were stalled by France.<ref name="bbcturkeyunhappy">{{cite news|title=Turkey unhappy at EU talks delay|work=]|date=26 June 2007|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6241176.stm|access-date=3 July 2007| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20070716215215/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6241176.stm| archive-date= 16 July 2007 | url-status= live}}</ref> ] became the European Union's fifth-largest trade partner in 2015 according to data released by ].<ref>{{cite web|title = Turkey becomes EU's fifth-largest trade partner|url = http://www.worldbulletin.net/todays-news/169583/turkey-becomes-eus-fifth-largest-trade-partner|website = World Bulletin|access-date = 19 February 2016|archive-date = 22 August 2016|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160822130649/http://www.worldbulletin.net/todays-news/169583/turkey-becomes-eus-fifth-largest-trade-partner|url-status = live}}</ref>

Turkey is set to receive EUR 9.2bn from the ], a funding mechanism for EU candidate countries.

===Population===
{{Further|Demographics of Turkey}}
] in ]'s cosmopolitan ] district is visited by an average of 3 million people on weekend days.]]

{{As of|2005}}, the population of Turkey stood at 71.5&nbsp;million with a yearly growth rate of 1.5%.<ref name="WorldBank_Turkey_glance">{{cite web|publisher=World Bank |url= http://devdata.worldbank.org/AAG/tur_aag.pdf |title=Turkey at a glance |access-date=10 December 2006 |date=13 August 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061210205513/http://devdata.worldbank.org/AAG/tur_aag.pdf |archive-date=10 December 2006 }}</ref><ref name="WorldBank_TRStat">{{cite web|url= http://go.worldbank.org/KMLVYJ93M0|archive-url = http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20151105051121/http://go.worldbank.org/KMLVYJ93M0 |archive-date=5 November 2015 |title=Data and Statistics for Turkey|publisher=World Bank |access-date=10 December 2006 |year=2005}}</ref> The Turkish population is relatively young, with 25.5% falling within the 0–15 age bracket.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.intute.ac.uk/sciences/worldguide/html/1046_people.html|title=Turkey – Population and Demographics|publisher=Intute|access-date=10 December 2006|date=July 2006|archive-date=21 March 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090321065038/http://www.intute.ac.uk/sciences/worldguide/html/1046_people.html|url-status=live}}</ref> As of February 2023, the population of Turkey is approximately 87 million people.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Turkey Population (2023) - Worldometer |url=https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/turkey-population/#:~:text=Population%20of%20Turkey%20(2020%20and%20historical)%20%20,%20%2030.2%20%2014%20more%20rows |access-date=2023-02-07 |website=www.worldometers.info |language=en |archive-date=24 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190324023917/http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/turkey-population/#:~:text=Population%20of%20Turkey%20(2020%20and%20historical)%20%20,%20%2030.2%20%2014%20more%20rows |url-status=live }}</ref>

Turkey's large population could alter the balance of power in the representative European institutions. Upon joining the EU, Turkey would be allocated the largest number of ]s in the ]. This is because the European Parliament distributes seats to member states according to their population.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Global Observer |journal=Beijing Review |date=2003 |page=15 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zvUMAQAAMAAJ&q=Turkey,+if+admitted,+will+have+the+most+seats,+with+which+it+will+probably+influence+the+EU |access-date=28 March 2021 |archive-date=22 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230122184646/https://www.google.com/books/edition/Beijing_Review/zvUMAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=Turkey,+if+admitted,+will+have+the+most+seats,+with+which+it+will+probably+influence+the+EU&dq=Turkey,+if+admitted,+will+have+the+most+seats,+with+which+it+will+probably+influence+the+EU&printsec=frontcover |url-status=live }}</ref> Therefore, if Turkey is admitted, it could influence the EU legislation and administration in line with its own policies.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Steiner |first1=Jürg |last2=Crepaz |first2=Markus M. L. |title=European Democracies |date=2007 |publisher=Pearson Longman |isbn=978-0-321-07773-8 |page=282 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mtFtFP1LgZsC&q=Turkey+will+have+at+least+the+same+influence+if+not+more+than+London,+Berlin,+or+Paris |access-date=28 March 2021 |archive-date=22 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230122184647/https://www.google.com/books/edition/European_Democracies/mtFtFP1LgZsC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=Turkey+will+have+at+least+the+same+influence+if+not+more+than+London,+Berlin,+or+Paris&dq=Turkey+will+have+at+least+the+same+influence+if+not+more+than+London,+Berlin,+or+Paris&printsec=frontcover |url-status=live }}</ref>

If Turkey were to join the European Union, ] would become the most populous ] in the EU (as of 2004).<ref>{{cite web |title=Eurostat Regional Yearbook – Focus on European cities |url=https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/5784093/KS-HA-13-001-12-EN.PDF.pdf/89d2a7bb-0860-46cc-a494-cd5eeadbafc8?t=1414777594000 |publisher=European Commission |quote=The largest Turkish city, İstanbul, had 9.9 million inhabitants, larger than any city within the EU |page=200 |date=2013 |access-date=28 March 2021 |archive-date=15 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210415074428/https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/5784093/KS-HA-13-001-12-EN.PDF.pdf/89d2a7bb-0860-46cc-a494-cd5eeadbafc8?t=1414777594000 |url-status=live }}</ref>

===Foreign relations with EU member states===
{{Main|Foreign relations of Turkey}}
{|
|-
| valign=top |
* {{flagicon|Austria}} ]
* {{flagicon|Belgium}} ]
* {{flagicon|Bulgaria}} ]
* {{flagicon|Croatia}} ]
* {{flagicon|Czech Republic}} ]
* {{flagicon|Denmark}} ]
| valign=top |
* {{flagicon|Estonia}} ]
* {{flagicon|Finland}} ]
* {{flagicon|France}} ]
* {{flagicon|Germany}} ]
* {{flagicon|Greece}} ]
* {{flagicon|Hungary}} ]
* {{flagicon|Ireland}} ]
| valign=top |
* {{flagicon|Italy}} ]
* {{flagicon|Latvia}} ]
* {{flagicon|Lithuania}} ]
* {{flagicon|Luxembourg}} ]
* {{flagicon|Malta}} ]
* {{flagicon|Netherlands}} ]
* {{flagicon|Poland}} ]
| valign=top |
* {{flagicon|Portugal}} ]
* {{flagicon|Romania}} ]
* {{flagicon|Slovakia}} ]
* {{flagicon|Slovenia}} ]
* {{flagicon|Spain}} ]
* {{flagicon|Sweden}} ]
|}
Turkey has no diplomatic relations with {{flagicon|Cyprus}} ] as Turkey does not recognize the government of the Republic of Cyprus.
====Cyprus====
{{further|Cyprus problem}}

] was divided when, on 20 July 1974, Turkey invaded and ] in response to an ] aimed at ].<ref>{{cite book|last=Cook |first=Chris |author2= Diccon Bewes |title=What Happened Where: A Guide to Places and Events in Twentieth-century History |publisher=Routledge |year=1997 |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=FuGrcgcOiXoC |isbn=1-85728-533-6|page=65 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Mallinson |first=William |title=Cyprus: A Modern History |publisher=I. B. Tauris |date=30 June 2005 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HEjkuhF2GsMC&pg=PA80 |isbn=978-1-85043-580-8 |page=80 |access-date=12 December 2015 |archive-date=22 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230122184638/https://books.google.com/books?id=HEjkuhF2GsMC&pg=PA80 |url-status=live }}</ref> Since then, Turkey has refused to acknowledge the ] (an EU member since ]) as the sole authority on the island, and recognizes the self-declared ] since its establishment in 1983. The Turkish invasion in 1974 and the resulting movement of ] along both sides of the ], and the establishment of the self-declared ] in 1983, form the core issues which surround the ongoing ].

Turkey and the ] backed the 2004 ] aimed at the reunification of the island, but the plan was subsequently rejected by Greek Cypriots on the grounds that it did not meet their needs. According to Greek Cypriots, the latest proposal included maintained residence rights for the many Anatolian Turks who moved to Cyprus after the invasion (and their descendants who were born on the island after 1974), while the Greek Cypriots who lost their property after the Turkish invasion would be granted only a restricted right of return to the north following the island's proposed reunification.{{Citation needed|date=August 2008}} Although the outcome received much criticism in the EU as well, the Republic of Cyprus was admitted into the EU a week after the referendum.

] has been recognised only by Turkey since its establishment in 1983. In 2004, the ] (PACE) gave observer status (without voting rights) to the representatives of the Turkish Cypriot community.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://assembly.coe.int/Main.asp?link=/Documents/AdoptedText/ta04/ERES1376.htm |title=Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly |publisher=Assembly.coe.int |access-date=14 February 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140307155611/http://assembly.coe.int/Main.asp?link=%2FDocuments%2FAdoptedText%2Fta04%2FERES1376.htm |archive-date=7 March 2014 }}</ref>]]

The Turkish government has refused to officially recognise the Republic of Cyprus until the removal of the political and economic blockade on the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus.{{Citation needed|date=December 2009}} Turkey's non-recognition of the Republic of Cyprus has led to complications within the ]. Under the customs agreements which Turkey had already signed as a precondition to start EU membership negotiations in 2005, it is obliged to open its ports to Cypriot planes and vessels, but Turkey has not complied so far;<ref name="tw"/> refusing to do so until the EU eases the international isolation of Northern Cyprus.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/cyprus/7992966/Greece-calls-on-Turkey-to-pull-out-of-Cyprus.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220112/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/cyprus/7992966/Greece-calls-on-Turkey-to-pull-out-of-Cyprus.html |archive-date=12 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title=Greece calls on Turkey to pull out of Cyprus|publisher=Daily Telegraph|date=9 September 2010|location=London}}{{cbignore}}</ref> In February 2013, Turkish EU Minister Egemen Bağış told the ], "if you truly want salvation, truly want peace, then remove your blockade of ] to EU member countries and Turkey will open its ports to you."<ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.abhaber.com/haberler/haber/haberler/bagistan-rum-yonetimine-ercana-karsilik-limanlarimiz--048265|title=ABHaber<!-- Bot generated title -->|access-date=5 September 2017|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20130416024743/http://www.abhaber.com/haberler/haber/haberler/bagistan-rum-yonetimine-ercana-karsilik-limanlarimiz--048265 |archive-date=16 April 2013}}</ref>

Turkey's refusal to implement a trade pact between Turkey and the EU that requires the Turkish government to allow Greek Cypriot vessels to use its air and seaports has prompted the EU to freeze eight chapters in Turkey's accession talks.<ref name="tw"/>

In November 2009, Turkish Deputy Prime Minister ] declared that, should Turkey be forced to choose between supporting either EU membership or Turkish Cypriots, " Turkey's choice will forever be to stand next to the Turkish Cypriots. Everybody should understand this."<ref name="tw">{{cite web | access-date=9 December 2009 | archive-date=21 November 2009 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091121141905/http://www.turkishweekly.net/news/92895/-39-turkish-cypriots-are-more-important-than-the-eu-39-.html | url=http://www.turkishweekly.net/news/92895/-39-turkish-cypriots-are-more-important-than-the-eu-39-.html | title=Turkish Cypriots are More Important Than the EU }}</ref>

====Greece====
{{further|Greece–Turkey relations}}
The issue of Turkish membership has been contentious in Greece. An opinion poll from 2005 suggested that only 25% of ] believe Turkey has a place in the European Union.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/4298408.stm|title=BBC NEWS – Europe – Analysis: EU views on Turkish bid|date=30 September 2005|access-date=7 June 2015|archive-date=5 June 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200605165128/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/4298408.stm|url-status=live}}</ref> The former Greek Prime Minister ] stated that Turkish membership of the EU could only be predicated upon, "full compliance, full accession" in December 2006.<ref name="karamanlis">{{cite news|first=A.|last=Panagopoulis|title=Karamanlis Hails EU's 'Historic' Decision to Admit Bulgaria, Romania|work=Greek News|date=18 December 2006|url=http://www.greeknewsonline.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=5974&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0|access-date=13 April 2007|archive-date=20 February 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090220074946/http://greeknewsonline.com/modules.php?name=News|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2005 the European Commission referred to relations between Turkey and Greece as "continuing to develop positively"<ref name="ec2005progressreport">{{cite press release|title=Turkey – 2005 Progress Report|publisher=]|date=11 August 2005|url= http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/2005/package/sec_1426_final_progress_report_tr_en.pdf|access-date=6 July 2007| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20070630225819/http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/2005/package/sec_1426_final_progress_report_tr_en.pdf| archive-date= 30 June 2007 |url-status=live}}</ref> while also citing a key barrier to progress being Turkey's ongoing claim of '']'' over a dispute about territorial waters boundaries.<ref name="ec2005progressreport"/>
In September 2017, Greek Prime Minister, ], mentioned that halting accession talks with Turkey would be a strategic mistake by the ], amid a war of words raging between Germany and Turkey.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/greece-warns-ending-eu-talks-with-turkey-a-mistake--117812|title=Greece warns ending EU talks with Turkey a mistake – World News|website=Hürriyet Daily News|access-date=5 December 2019|archive-date=12 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112042832/http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/greece-warns-ending-eu-talks-with-turkey-a-mistake--117812|url-status=live}}</ref> Also, former Greek Prime Minister, ], has urged European Union leaders to keep the doors open to Turkey and to continue dialogue with the Turkish government, in an apparent reference to the former German Chancellor Angela Merkel's calls for the suspension of accession talks with Turkey.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/former-greek-pm-urges-eu-to-keep-doors-open-to-turkey-118059|title=Former Greek PM urges EU to keep doors open to Turkey – Turkey News|website=Hürriyet Daily News|access-date=5 December 2019|archive-date=5 December 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191205230711/http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/former-greek-pm-urges-eu-to-keep-doors-open-to-turkey-118059|url-status=live}}</ref>

===Religion===
{{Further|Religion in Turkey|Secularism in Turkey}}

] (532–537) in ] (]) built by the ] emperor ] was the largest cathedral ever constructed in the world for nearly a millennium, until the completion of the ] (1507) in Spain.]]

Turkey has a ] constitution, civil and judicial system with no official religion, although the country's most prominent imam (currently ]) is a civil servant and head of the ], or ''Diyanet''.<ref>{{cite news|url= http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3225651.stm |access-date=26 August 2008 |title=Headscarf row goes to Turkey's roots |work=BBC News |date=29 October 2003 |first=Pam |last=O'Toole |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080828045046/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3225651.stm |archive-date= 28 August 2008 |url-status= live}}</ref> 82% of the Turkish population is ]<ref>{{cite web|url=https://2009-2017.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/3432.htm|title=Turkey|work=U.S. Department of State|access-date=7 June 2015|archive-date=29 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201129164010/https://2009-2017.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/3432.htm|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/2006/71413.htm |publisher=Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. U.S. State Dept. |title=Turkey |date=15 September 2006 |work=International Religious Freedom Report |access-date=18 May 2013 |archive-date=20 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201020073819/https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/2006/71413.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> of whom over 70% belong to the ] branch of Islam. A minority is affiliated with ] ] branch.<ref>{{cite book |title=The Alevis in Turkey: The Emergence of a Secular Islamic Tradition |first=David |last=Shankland |publisher=Routledge (UK) |year=2003 |isbn=0-7007-1606-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lFFRzTqLp6AC&q=Religion+in+Turkey&pg=PP1 |access-date=6 October 2020 |archive-date=22 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230122184638/https://books.google.com/books?id=lFFRzTqLp6AC&q=Religion+in+Turkey&pg=PP1 |url-status=live }}{{Page needed|date=September 2010}}</ref> A separate study published in 2019 found 89.5% of Turks identify as Muslim.<ref>{{Cite web |last=ÖZKÖK |first=Ertuğrul |date=2019-05-21 |title=Türkiye artık yüzde 99'u müslüman olan ülke değil |url=https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/yazarlar/ertugrul-ozkok/turkiye-artik-yuzde-99u-musluman-olan-ulke-degil-41220410 |access-date=2024-10-06 |website=www.hurriyet.com.tr |language=tr}}</ref> Turkey would be the first and only Muslim-majority country to join or belong to the European Union. Current EU states typically contain large Muslim minorities. By contrast, Christians are believed to compose only 0.2% of Turkey's population.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/enlargement/western_balkans/el0003_en.htm|access-date=31 October 2011|title=Kosovo – Towards European integration|date=6 October 2011|archive-date=2 April 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150402185407/http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/enlargement/western_balkans/el0003_en.htm|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url= http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_225_report_en.pdf |title=Social values, Science and Technology |date=June 2005 |access-date=19 December 2006 |publisher=Eurobarometer |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20070114084147/http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_225_report_en.pdf |archive-date=14 January 2007 }}</ref>

Official population census polls in Turkey do not include information regarding a person's religious belief or ethnic background due to the regulations set by the Turkish constitution, which defines all citizens of the Republic of Turkey as Turkish in terms of nationality, regardless of faith or race.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.radikal.com.tr/haber.php?haberno=166463 |access-date=26 August 2008 |title=Alevilik İslamiyet'in içinde değil |work=Radikal |date=10 October 2005 |first=Nese |last=Ouzel |language=tr |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20150628201405/http://www.radikal.com.tr/haber.php?haberno=166463 |archive-date=28 June 2015}}</ref>

There is a tradition of ]. The state has no official religion nor promotes any, and actively monitors {{Clarify span|the area between the religions|date=February 2021}}.<ref name="TR_Secularism">{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3225651.stm |title=Headscarf row goes to Turkey's roots|work=BBC News |access-date=13 December 2006|date=29 October 2003| first=Pam | last=O'Toole| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20061118103758/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3225651.stm| archive-date= 18 November 2006 | url-status= live}}</ref> The constitution recognises the ] for individuals, whereas religious communities are placed under the protection of the state; but the constitution explicitly states that they cannot become involved in the political process (by forming a religious party, for instance) or establish faith-based schools. No party can claim that it represents a form of religious belief; nevertheless, religious sensibilities are generally represented through conservative parties.<ref name="TR_Secularism" /> Turkey used to prohibit by law the wearing of ] and theo-political symbolic garments for both sexes in government buildings, schools, and universities;<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5414098.stm|title=The Islamic veil across Europe|work=]|access-date=13 December 2006|date=17 November 2006|archive-date=22 February 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110222160835/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5414098.stm|url-status=live}}</ref> the law was upheld by the Grand Chamber of the ] as legitimate in the '']'' case on 10 November 2005.<ref>{{cite press release|url= http://www.echr.coe.int/Eng/Press/2005/Nov/GrandChamberJudgmentLeylaSahinvTurkey101105.htm |title=Leyla Şahin v. Turkey |author=Registrar |publisher=European Court of Human Rights |access-date=28 February 2008 |date=10 November 2005 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080804023338/http://www.echr.coe.int/Eng/Press/2005/Nov/GrandChamberJudgmentLeylaSahinvTurkey101105.htm |archive-date=4 August 2008 }}</ref> However, in 2010, the prohibition of wearing headscarves in universities was lifted.

Cultural differences between Muslim-majority Turkey and predominantly Christian Europe play an important part in the entire debate on Turkish accession to the ].

===Armenian genocide recognition===
{{main|Armenian genocide recognition#Turkey}}

In 2004, the French Foreign Minister ] stated that Turkey must recognise the systematic massacres of Armenians in 1915 as a ].<ref>{{cite news|title=Turkey 'must admit Armenia dead'|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4092933.stm|access-date=26 March 2013 |newspaper=British Broadcasting Network (BBC) |date=13 December 2004|archive-date=17 October 2020|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20201017221334/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4092933.stm}}</ref> However, he insisted that although France did not set a precondition for European Union entry regarding the matter, he stated that France would raise the issue during negotiations. The President of the European Parliament, ], stated that it must be a precondition for Turkey to recognise the systematic massacres of Armenians in 1915 as genocide.<ref>{{cite news|title=Genocide Recognition Precondition to Turkey's EU Bid, Says Euro-Parliament President|url=http://asbarez.com/105486/|access-date=26 March 2013|newspaper=Asbarez|date=18 September 2012|archive-date=6 May 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130506134653/http://asbarez.com/105486/}}</ref>

The government of Turkey rejects such a precondition for EU membership and does not accept it as a part of the ].

In 2006, the ] voted against a proposal to formally add the issue as a membership criterion for Turkey.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=IM-PRESS&reference=20060922IPR10896&language=EN|title=European Parliament critical of slowdown in Turkey's reform process|access-date=7 June 2015|archive-date=3 January 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150103024910/http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=IM-PRESS&reference=20060922IPR10896&language=EN|url-status=live}}</ref> A similar proposal by Greek and Greek Cypriot MEPs was also rejected by the European Parliament in 2011.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.armenianow.com/genocide/28146/spain_armenian_genocide_bill |title= Spain Says No: Genocide bill rejected - Genocide - ArmeniaNow.com |access-date= 7 June 2015 |archive-date= 6 April 2016 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160406133257/http://www.armenianow.com/genocide/28146/spain_armenian_genocide_bill }}</ref>

===LGBT rights in Turkey===
{{Main|LGBT rights in Turkey}}
] parade in 2013, ], ] (before the ban in 2015).]]

Although homosexuality is not a crime in Turkey, in contravention of European Union directives<!-- Directives are not compulsory. --> on human rights{{Which|date=January 2022}}; Turkey temporarily banned LGBT ]s in 2015 and 2016.<ref>{{cite news|url= https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/27/turkey-police-fire-rubber-bullets-at-banned-gay-pride-parade/ |archive-url= https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220112/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/27/turkey-police-fire-rubber-bullets-at-banned-gay-pride-parade/ |archive-date=12 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |title=Turkey police fire rubber bullets at banned Gay Pride parade |newspaper=The Telegraph|date=27 June 2016|access-date=5 August 2016|agency=Agence France-Presse}}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/28/world/turkey-pride-parade-lgbt-violence/index.html |title=Turkish police fire pepper spray at gay pride parade |first1=Ashley |last1=Fantz |first2=Gul |last2=Tuysuz |first3=Arwa |last3=Damon |work=CNN |date=28 June 2015 |access-date=5 August 2016 |archive-date=3 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210103141442/https://www.cnn.com/2015/06/28/world/turkey-pride-parade-lgbt-violence/index.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.lgbt-ep.eu/intergroup-documents/meps-condemn-crackdown-on-istanbul-pride/|title=MEPs condemn crackdown on Istanbul Pride {{!}} The European Parliament Intergroup on LGBTI Rights |website=lgbt-ep.eu|access-date=5 August 2016|archive-date=2 April 2019|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20190402050039/http://www.lgbt-ep.eu/intergroup-documents/meps-condemn-crackdown-on-istanbul-pride/}}</ref> Reasons given for the ban were "security concerns", and "religious sensitivities of the public" caused by holding the parade during the month of Ramadan.

===Article 301===
{{Main|Censorship in Turkey|Human rights in Turkey|Article 301}}

Article 301 states that "a person who publicly insults the Turkish nation, the State of the Republic of Turkey, or the ], shall be punishable by imprisonment of between six months and two years" and also that "expressions of thought intended to criticise shall not constitute a crime."

The EU was especially critical of this law during the September 2005 trial of novelist ] over comments that recognised the deaths of thirty thousand Kurds ]. Enlargement commissioner Olli Rehn and members of the European Parliament called the case "regrettable", "most unfortunate", and "unacceptable".<ref name="bbc3">{{cite news|last=Dymond|first=Jonny|title=EU blasts Turkish author's trial|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4243102.stm|work=]|date=13 September 2005|access-date=6 July 2007|archive-date=25 June 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200625170648/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4243102.stm|url-status=live}}</ref> After the case was dropped three months later, Turkey's Foreign Minister ] indicated that Turkey may abandon or modify Article 301, stating that "there may be need for a new law".<ref name="gul301">{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4565466.stm|title=Turkey insult law 'may be dumped'|work=BBC News|date=28 December 2005|access-date=6 July 2007|archive-date=4 January 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070104050211/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4565466.stm|url-status=live}}</ref> In September 2006, the European Parliament called for the abolition of laws, such as Article 301, "which threaten European free speech norms".<ref name="bbc2">{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5385954.stm |title=New EU warning on Turkey reforms |work=BBC News |date=27 September 2006 |access-date=8 July 2007 |archive-date=17 September 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190917130602/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5385954.stm |url-status=live }}</ref> On 30 April 2008, the law was reformed.<ref name="news.bbc.co.uk">{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7375327.stm|title=BBC NEWS – Europe – EU hails Turkey free speech move|date=30 April 2008|access-date=7 June 2015|archive-date=2 September 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190902204820/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7375327.stm|url-status=live}}</ref> According to the reform, it is now a crime to explicitly insult the "Turkish nation" rather than "Turkishness"; opening court cases based on Article 301 require the approval of the Justice Minister; and the maximum punishment has been reduced to two years in jail.<ref name="news.bbc.co.uk"/>

], a patriotic lawyer, and other members of ''Büyük Hukukçular Birliği'' (Great Jurists Union) headed by Kerinçsiz, have been "behind nearly all of trials."<ref name=kerincsiz>{{cite news |url=http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2006/09/06/europe/EU_GEN_Turkey_Nationalist_Lawyer.php |access-date=26 August 2008 |title=In Turkey, ultra-nationalist lawyer wins supporters as enthusiasm for the EU falls |date=5 September 2006 |agency=Associated Press |publisher=International Herald Tribune |archive-date=4 June 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080604164126/http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2006/09/06/europe/EU_GEN_Turkey_Nationalist_Lawyer.php |url-status=live }}</ref> In January 2008, Kerinçsiz was arrested for participating in an ultra-nationalist underground organisation, ], allegedly<!-- as a legal term--> behind the attacks on the ] and ] newspaper,<ref>{{cite news|url= http://www.turkishdailynews.com.tr/article.php?enewsid=94758|title=The Turkish Leviathan under arrest?|date=26 January 2008|access-date=22 April 2008|last=Akyol|first=Mustafa|author-link=Mustafa Akyol|work=Turkish Daily News |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080405211648/http://www.turkishdailynews.com.tr/article.php?enewsid=94758 |archive-date=5 April 2008}}</ref> the ] and Armenian-Turkish journalist ],<ref>{{Cite news |last=Tavernise |first=Sabrina |author-link=Sabrina Tavernise |date=28 January 2008 |title=13 Arrested in Push to Stifle Turkish Ultranationalists Suspected in Political Killings |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/28/world/europe/28turkey.html |access-date=7 October 2024 |work=]}}</ref> as well as allegedly plotting the assassination of Nobel laureate ].<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090112235627/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/World/Plot_to_kill_Pamuk_foiled/articleshow/2729362.cms |date=12 January 2009 }}. ''Times of India''. 25 January 2008</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/books/2008/jan/28/nobelprize.orhanpamuk |title='Plot to kill' Nobel laureate |work=Guardian: Books |date=28 January 2008 |last=Lea |first=Richard |access-date=18 May 2013 |location=London |archive-date=19 December 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201219013226/https://www.theguardian.com/books/2008/jan/28/nobelprize.orhanpamuk |url-status=live }}</ref> The Ergenekon trials were later attributed to a plot organized by a "foreign-based Gulenist terror organization" and all charges were dropped after the attempted military coup by Gulenists on 15 July 2016. {{citation needed|date=November 2021}}

===Women's rights===
{{further|Women in Turkey}}
] joined the ] with the 1935 general elections, at a time when women in a significant number of other European countries had ] for the local municipal elections, but not for the national parliamentary elections. In 1993 ] became Turkey's first female ].]]
], Turkey withdrew from the ], which was ratified by the ] in 2011.<ref name="coe-ic">{{cite web|url=https://www.coe.int/en/web/commissioner/-/turkey-s-announced-withdrawal-from-the-istanbul-convention-endangers-women-s-rights|title=Turkey's announced withdrawal from the Istanbul Convention endangers women's rights|publisher=Council of Europe|date=22 March 2021|access-date=18 April 2021|archive-date=2 May 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220502131158/https://www.coe.int/en/web/commissioner/-/turkey-s-announced-withdrawal-from-the-istanbul-convention-endangers-women-s-rights|url-status=live}}</ref> The decision was criticised by the ]<ref>{{cite web|url=https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/news_corner/news/turkey-statement-high-representativevice-president-josep-borrell-turkey%E2%80%99s_en|title=Turkey: Statement by High Representative/Vice-President Josep Borrell on Turkey's withdrawal of the Istanbul Convention|publisher=European Commission|date=20 March 2021|access-date=18 April 2021|archive-date=4 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210504233125/https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/news_corner/news/turkey-statement-high-representativevice-president-josep-borrell-turkey%E2%80%99s_en|url-status=live}}</ref> and the ].<ref name="coe-ic"/>]]

Turkey gave women ] in 1930 for municipal elections. In 1934 this right was expanded for the national elections, while women were also given the right to become elected as ] in the ], or for being appointed as Ministers, Prime Minister, ] and ]. In 1993 ] became the first female ].

In its second report on women's role in social, economic, and political life in Turkey, the ] emphasised that respecting human rights, including women's rights, is an essential condition for Turkey's membership in the EU. According to the report, Turkey's legal framework on women's rights "has in general been satisfactory, but its substantive implementation remains flawed."<ref>{{cite press release|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?language=EN&type=IM-PRESS&reference=20070208IPR02887|title=Women's rights in Turkey: MEPs say improvements still needed|access-date=13 April 2007|publisher=European Parliament|date=13 February 2007|archive-date=3 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210103134747/https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?language=EN&type=IM-PRESS&reference=20070208IPR02887|url-status=live}}</ref>

===Conscientious objectors<!-- Does EU, equate Council of Europe? -->===
Turkey is one of two states (along with ]) among the 47 members of the Council of Europe which refuse to recognise the status of ]s or give them an alternative to military service, other than a reduction of service by paying a tax.<ref>{{cite news|url= https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/leading-turkish-writer-faces-jail-after-incurring-wrath-of-military-481368.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090825195809/http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/leading-turkish-writer-faces-jail-after-incurring-wrath-of-military-481368.html |archive-date=2009-08-25 |url-access=limited |url-status=live |title=Leading Turkish writer faces jail after incurring wrath of military|access-date=13 April 2007 |work=Independent|first=Peter|last=Popham|date=7 June 2006|location=London}}</ref>

==Public reactions==
{{Update|part=section|date=January 2021|reason=}}

===In the EU===
Public opinion in EU countries generally opposes Turkish membership, though with varying degrees of intensity. The ] September–October 2006 survey<ref name="eurobarometer_66">{{cite web|title=European Commission: ''Eurobarometer 66 – Public Opinion in the European Union'', Sep–Oct 2006, p.223|url=http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb66/eb66_en.pdf|access-date=1 September 2007|archive-date=27 February 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080227020400/http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb66/eb66_en.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> shows that 59% of EU-27 citizens were against Turkey joining the EU, while only about 28% were in favour. Nearly all citizens (about 9 in 10) expressed concerns about human rights as the leading cause. In the earlier March–May 2006 ], citizens from the new member states were more in favour of Turkey joining (44% in favour) than the old ] (38% in favour). At the time of the survey, the country whose population most strongly opposed Turkish membership was ] (con: 81%), while ] was most in favour of the accession (pro: 66%). On a wider political scope, the highest support came from the ] Community (pro: 67%) (which is not recognised as a sovereign state and is ''de facto'' not EU territory and out of the European institutions). These communities were even more in favour of the accession than the Turkish populace itself (pro: 54%).<ref name="special_eurobarometer_255">{{cite web|title=European Commission: Special Eurobarometer 255 – Attitudes towards EU Enlargement |date=July 2006 |page=72 |url= http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_255_en.pdf |access-date=5 September 2006| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20060823004033/http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_255_en.pdf |archive-date=23 August 2006 | url-status= live}}</ref> Opposition in ] to Turkish membership was polled at 60% in October 2007, despite the Danish government's support for Turkey's EU bid.<ref name="copenhagen post 1">{{cite news|title=Disagreement over Turkish EU membership |publisher=Copenhagen Post |date=22 October 2007 |url= http://www.cphpost.dk/get/103964.html |archive-url= https://archive.today/20070810190926/http://www.cphpost.dk/get/103964.html |archive-date=10 August 2007 |access-date=22 October 2007}}</ref>

There is a trend in declining support since 2000 that has continued due to the ] and the ]. In the past support for Turkish accession came especially from left-wing parties, but more recently both sides of the political spectrum in Europe have been highly critical of Turkey's human rights record. Opposition to Turkish accession is higher in countries such as Bulgaria and Germany which have a high population of ] or ].<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Jakob Lindgaard |date=October 2018 |title=EU Public Opinion on Turkish EU Membership: Trends and Drivers |url=https://feuture.uni-koeln.de/sites/feuture/user_upload/Online_Paper_No_25_final.pdf |work=Feuture at the University of Cologne |pages=9, 16, 17 |access-date=3 December 2020 |archive-date=4 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210104191628/https://feuture.uni-koeln.de/sites/feuture/user_upload/Online_Paper_No_25_final.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Phinnemore |first1=David |last2=İçener |first2=Erhan |title=Holding the door half (?) open: the EU and Turkey 10 years on |journal=Journal of Contemporary European Studies |date=2016 |volume=24 |issue=4 |pages=446–462 |doi=10.1080/14782804.2016.1178104 |s2cid=156427227 |url=https://pure.qub.ac.uk/en/publications/holding-the-door-half--open-the-eu-and-turkey-10-years-on(38fd1d7c-bd48-4a2a-b2dc-bce7ca693455).html |quote=The last decade has seen this opposition not only increase, but also manifest itself more prominently in party political rhetoric. What might be described as 'Turkoscepticism' has been on the rise, often coinciding with increases in anti-Muslim sentiments across Europe. In member states with larger Muslim populations, the response has been for governments to adopt more sceptical if not hostile positions towards Turkish accession. The clearest examples were Austria, Germany, and France where Eurobarometer polling in 2005 indicated that support for Turkey's accession was as low as 10% in Austria and 21% in the other two countries |access-date=20 December 2020 |archive-date=4 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210104193055/https://pure.qub.ac.uk/en/publications/holding-the-door-half-open-the-eu-and-turkey-10-years-on |url-status=live }}</ref> ] polls from 2016<ref>{{Cite web |last=Matthew Smith |date=August 3, 2016 |title=Turkey less popular choice to join the EU than even Russia |url=https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2016/08/03/turkey-less-popular-choice-join-eu-even-russia |work=YouGov |language=en-gb |access-date=4 March 2022 |archive-date=19 May 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220519115927/https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2016/08/03/turkey-less-popular-choice-join-eu-even-russia |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=":0" /> and 2019 have found respondents from France, Germany, Denmark, ] and ] to have the largest net opposition to Turkey's EU bid out of several other choices, including ] and ].<ref>{{Cite web |date=March 4, 2019 |title=Eurotrack: which countries do Europeans think should be in the EU? |url=https://yougov.co.uk/topics/international/articles-reports/2019/03/04/eurotrack-it-was-mistake-admit-romania-and-bulgari |work=YouGov |language=en-gb |access-date=4 March 2022 |archive-date=13 May 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220513135240/https://yougov.co.uk/topics/international/articles-reports/2019/03/04/eurotrack-it-was-mistake-admit-romania-and-bulgari |url-status=live }}</ref>

===In Turkey===
The opening of membership talks with the EU in December 2004 was celebrated by Turkey with much fanfare,<ref name="economist1">{{cite news|work=Economist|title=The ever-lengthening road|date=7 December 2006|url=http://www.economist.com/research/articlesBySubject/displaystory.cfm?subjectid=682266&story_id=8381644|access-date=4 July 2007|archive-date=6 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160306020520/http://www.economist.com/node/8381644|url-status=live}}</ref> but the Turkish populace has become increasingly sceptical as negotiations were delayed based on what it views as lukewarm support for its accession to the EU and perceived double standards in its negotiations particularly with regard to the French and Austrian ]s. A mid-2006 ] survey revealed that 43% of Turkish citizens view the EU positively; just 35% trust the EU, 45% support enlargement and just 29% support an EU constitution.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/english/4713737.asp?gid=74|title=New Eurobarometer poll results show a drop in Turkish support for the EU|work=Hurriyet|access-date=13 April 2007|archive-date=15 December 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181215224600/http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/new-eurobarometer-poll-results-show-a-drop-in-turkish-support-for-the-eu-4713737|url-status=live}}</ref>

Moreover, Turks were divided on whether to join at all. A 2007 poll put Turkish support for accession to the EU at 41.9% (up from 32% in 2006), with 27.7% opposed and 24.0% indifferent.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/support_for_eu_accession_increases_in_turkey/ |title=Support for EU Accession Increases in Turkey |access-date=18 May 2013 |url-status= usurped |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20081007182329/http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/support_for_eu_accession_increases_in_turkey/ |archive-date=7 October 2008 }}</ref> A 2009 poll showed that support for accession had risen to 48%, even as negative views of the EU had risen from 28% to 32%.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.radikal.com.tr/yorum/turkler_abye_ragmen_abyi_istiyor-953764 |title=Türkler AB'ye rağmen AB'yi istiyor |work=Radikal |access-date=18 May 2013 |archive-date=24 September 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924145250/http://www.radikal.com.tr/yorum/turkler_abye_ragmen_abyi_istiyor-953764 |url-status=live }}</ref> A 2013 poll showed Turkish support for the EU bid at one third of the population, and opposition to double that share.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/Default.aspx?pageID=238&nid=39870|title=Turkey losing appetite for EU bid, says survey|date=26 January 2013|access-date=18 August 2013|archive-date=8 November 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161108061129/http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/Default.aspx?pageID=238&nid=39870|url-status=live}}</ref>

According to the Transatlantic Trends survey for 2013, 60% of Turks have an unfavourable view of the European Union<ref>{{cite web|url= http://trends.gmfus.org/transatlantic-trends/key-findings/5/|title=Key Findings 5 |work=Transatlantic Trends |access-date=7 June 2015 |archive-url= http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20160517171359/http://trends.gmfus.org/transatlantic-trends/key-findings/5/ |archive-date=17 May 2016}}</ref> and most Turks believe that working with Asia is more important to their national interests than working with Europe.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://trends.gmfus.org/transatlantic-trends/key-findings/6/ |title=Key Findings 6 |work=Transatlantic Trends|access-date=7 June 2015|archive-url=http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20160517171436/http://trends.gmfus.org/transatlantic-trends/key-findings/6/ |archive-date=17 May 2016 }}</ref> Around 44% of Turks believe EU membership could be good for the economy in contrast with 61% for EU citizens.<ref>{{cite web|url= http://trends.gmfus.org/transatlantic-trends/key-findings/8/|title=Key Findings 8 |work=Transatlantic Trends |access-date=7 June 2015|archive-url= http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20160517171448/http://trends.gmfus.org/transatlantic-trends/key-findings/8/ |archive-date=17 May 2016}}</ref> During an interview with Euractiv, EU Minister Egemen Bağış stated that: "This is what Europe needs to do; they need to say that when Turkey fulfills all requirements, Turkey will become a member of the EU on date X. Then, we will regain the Turkish public opinion support in one day."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.euractiv.com.tr/ab-ve-turkiye/article/bagis-fransanin-tutumunda-degisimin-basladigini-goruyoruz-027174 |title=Bağış: Fransa'nın tutumunda değişimin başladığını görüyoruz |access-date=7 June 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160109202339/http://www.euractiv.com.tr/ab-ve-turkiye/article/bagis-fransanin-tutumunda-degisimin-basladigini-goruyoruz-027174 |archive-date=9 January 2016 }}</ref>

==Official viewpoints==
{{Wikinews|EU sets date for membership talks with Turkey}}

===Major current viewpoints===
*{{flagicon|EU}} ] ] candidates ] (]) and ] (]) promised that Turkey would never join the European Union while either one of them were President, reasoning that Turkey had turned its back on European democratic values.<ref>{{cite web|last=Sarmadi|first=Dario|title=Juncker and Schulz say 'no' to Turkey in last TV duel|url=http://www.euractiv.com/sections/eu-elections-2014/juncker-and-schulz-say-no-turkey-last-tv-duel-302278|date=21 May 2014|publisher=Efficacité et Transparence des Acteurs Européens|access-date=26 May 2014|archive-date=12 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112035650/https://www.euractiv.com/section/global-europe/news/juncker-and-schulz-say-no-to-turkey-in-last-tv-duel/|url-status=live}}</ref> Juncker won the election and became the new president of the EU in November 2014. He stated that April:<ref>{{cite web|url= http://juncker.epp.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/nodes/en_03_fp.pdf |title=My Foreign Policy Objectives |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20200818040426/http://juncker.epp.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/nodes/en_03_fp.pdf |date=23 April 2014 |archive-date= 18 August 2020 |work=EU President Juncker |quote=When it comes to enlargement, this has been a historic success. However, Europe now needs to digest the addition of 13 Member States in the past 10 years. Our citizens need a pause from enlargement so we can consolidate what has been achieved among the 28. This is why, under my Presidency of the Commission, ongoing negotiations will of course continue, and notably the Western Balkans will need to keep a European perspective, but no further enlargement will take place over the next five years. As regards Turkey, the country is clearly far away from EU membership. A government that blocks Twitter is certainly not ready for accession.}}</ref>
{{blockquote|... under my ] ... ''no further enlargement will take place over the next five years''. As regards Turkey, the country is clearly far away from EU membership. A government that blocks Twitter is certainly not ready for accession.}}
*{{flagicon|TUR}} Primary reasons for Turkey's persistent requests to join the EU are, among others, the many ] and the importance of trade between the two. Turkey is, however, also increasingly disappointed with the widespread opposition to its accession among EU member states. In September 2012, Turkish Prime Minister ] was asked by CNN if Turkey still wants to join the EU. His response: "There are 5 million Turks in Europe and 3 million ] alone. We are a natural member of the European Union. Germany invited Turkish workers 50 years ago, however, 50 years have passed and we have waited at the ]'s doorstep. No other country has experienced such a thing. We will be patient until a point. However, when we cross that point, we will bring light to the situation and decide accordingly."<ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.euractiv.com.tr/ab-ve-turkiye/article/erdogan-ab-konusunda-bir-yere-kadar-sabredecegiz-026036 |title=Erdoğan: 'AB konusunda bir yere kadar sabredeceğiz'|access-date=7 June 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150715021322/http://www.euractiv.com.tr/ab-ve-turkiye/article/erdogan-ab-konusunda-bir-yere-kadar-sabredecegiz-026036|archive-date=15 July 2015}}</ref> During a trip to ], Erdoğan expressed his stern disappointment regarding the EU accession process: "We are still an ]. At such a position, I wish EU accession. Otherwise, such a scenario would affect a large region including ] and Turkey."<ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.euractiv.com.tr/ab-ve-turkiye/article/erdoan-abnin-gucsuz-dusmesi-genis-bir-cografyayi-olumsuz-etkiler-026085 |title=Erdoğan: 'AB'nin güçsüz düşmesi geniş bir coğrafyayı olumsuz etkiler'|access-date=7 June 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150715014545/http://www.euractiv.com.tr/ab-ve-turkiye/article/erdoan-abnin-gucsuz-dusmesi-genis-bir-cografyayi-olumsuz-etkiler-026085|archive-date=15 July 2015}}</ref>
*{{flagicon|GER}} Former German Chancellor ] has repeatedly opposed full membership of Turkey to the EU at German-Turkish summits, advocating instead a ].<ref>{{Cite web |date=2010-03-29 |title=Kanzlerin in Ankara: Merkel lehnt EU-Beitritt der Türkei weiter ab |url=https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/kanzlerin-in-ankara-merkel-lehnt-eu-beitritt-der-tuerkei-weiter-ab-1953192.html |access-date=2024-10-07 |website=FAZ.NET |language=de}}</ref><ref name="Die Welt 20 September 2011">{{Cite web |title=Vor Treffen mit Gül: Merkel lehnt EU-Mitgliedschaft der Türkei ab - WELT |url=https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article13614695/Merkel-lehnt-EU-Mitgliedschaft-der-Tuerkei-ab.html |access-date=2024-10-07 |website=DIE WELT |language=de}}</ref> Some Christian Democrats back fuller support for Turkey, risking the chancellor becoming more isolated in advocating for a "privileged partnership".<ref>{{cite news | url=http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-germany-turkey-idUKBRE91M06C20130223 | work=Reuters | title=Merkel backs new EU talks for Turkey but has doubts | date=23 February 2013 | access-date=5 July 2021 | archive-date=24 April 2019 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190424002238/https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-germany-turkey-idUKBRE91M06C20130223 | url-status=dead }}</ref> In September 2011, on the occasion of the visit of the Turkish president ], Merkel said: "We don't want the full membership of Turkey. But we don't want to lose Turkey as an important country", referring to her idea of a strategic partnership.<ref name="Die Welt 20 September 2011"/> In 2006, Chancellor Merkel said "Turkey could be in deep, deep trouble when it comes to its aspirations to join the European Union" regarding its refusal to open up its ports to European Union member ].<ref name="spi">{{cite web|url=http://www.spiegel.de/international/0,1518,446747,00.html|title=Merkel Worried about Turkey: Situation Is "Very, Very Serious"|date=6 November 2006|work=Spiegel Online|access-date=7 June 2015|archive-date=3 March 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120303140015/http://www.spiegel.de/international/0,1518,446747,00.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Again in 2014, when Erdogan urged Merkel to strongly support his country's bid, there was no sign the chancellor had relinquished her skepticism. She revealed after the two had talked: "I personally said that we are in a negotiation process that has certain outcome and no fixed time frame. It is no secret and nothing has changed in my view that I am sceptical about full membership for Turkey."<ref>{{Cite news |date=4 February 2014 |title=Erdogan struggles with Merkel's scepticism on Turkish EU bid |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/world/erdogan-struggles-with-merkel-s-scepticism-on-turkish-eu-bid-idUSDEEA130C3/ |access-date=7 October 2024 |work=]}}</ref> In a TV debate in September 2017, then-German chancellor ] and her challenger ] both said that they would seek an end to Turkey's membership talks with the European Union.<ref name=the-end>{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-turkey-merkel/in-shift-merkel-backs-end-to-eu-turkey-membership-talks-idUSKCN1BE15B|title=In shift, Merkel backs end to EU-Turkey membership talks|work=Reuters|date=3 September 2017|access-date=19 December 2017|archive-date=18 December 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201218135305/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-turkey-merkel/in-shift-merkel-backs-end-to-eu-turkey-membership-talks-idUSKCN1BE15B|url-status=live}}</ref>
*{{flagicon|FRA}} Former French President ] opposed the entrance of Turkey in the European Union, arguing the country was too big, too poor, and too culturally different to join the EU. Former President ], however, reaffirmed support for Turkey in 2012, intending to smooth the way for French companies seeking contracts in Turkey. Franco-Turkish relations remained tense after Turkey imposed a law in 2009 that criminalised ] of the ] as a ]; a move ] reversed,{{clarify|date=January 2018}}<!-- how did a French court reverse a Turkish law? --> in turn, causing French firms' share of foreign investment in Turkey to shrink from 6% in 2009 to 3% in 2012. Leaders of French infrastructure companies were especially eager to enter the Turkish markets for ] and rail infrastructure, expected to respectively be worth $40 and $50&nbsp;billion by 2020.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://turquieeuropeenne.eu/article2371.html|title=Sarkozy: La France et l'Asie mineure – Turquie Européenne|access-date=7 June 2015|archive-date=28 June 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180628044412/http://turquieeuropeenne.eu/sarkozy-la-france-et-l-asie-mineure.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url= https://www.reuters.com/article/us-france-turkey-idUSBREA0Q1EV20140127 |title=France's Hollande cautiously backs Turkey EU membership bid |first=Elizabeth |last=Pineau |work=Reuters |date=27 January 2014 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20191008010501/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-france-turkey/frances-hollande-cautiously-backs-turkey-eu-membership-bid-idUSBREA0Q1EV20140127 |archive-date=8 October 2019 |access-date=27 December 2020}}</ref>

===Timeline===
*{{flagicon|GRE}} In September 1999, following a thaw in Greek-Turkish relations after mutual help in earthquake relief, Greek Foreign Minister ] told '']'' "Greece not only wants to see Turkey in the EU, it wants to be pulling the cart of a European Turkey", and that it was within his nation's interests as a way to avoid "continual conflict and tension with the block and European standards".<ref>{{cite news|title=World: Europe EU warms towards Turkey|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/445482.stm|access-date=23 February 2015|work=BBC News|date=13 September 1999|archive-date=4 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210104192945/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/445482.stm|url-status=live}}</ref>
*{{flagicon|FRA}}/{{flagicon|EU}} In November 2002, then-French President and then-President of the European Convention ] said in an interview with the French newspaper ], "Turkey is an important country close to Europe, but it is not a European country. It is not a European country because its capital is not in Europe and 95% of its population lives outside Europe." he said. Estaing continued as follows: "The Union should now focus on internal financial problems and the construction of European harmony instead of expansion. Those who most support Turkey joining the Union are actually opponents of the European Union. In fact, the majority of European Council members are against Turkey joining, but the Turks were never told this. Turkey joining the European Union would mean the end of the European Union."<ref>{{Cite news |date=2002-11-08 |title=Pour ou contre l'adhésion de la Turquie à l'Union européenne |url=https://www.lemonde.fr/europe/article/2002/11/08/pour-ou-contre-l-adhesion-de-la-turquie-a-l-union-europeenne_297386_3214.html |work=lemonde.fr |language=fr}}</ref>
*{{flagicon|EU}} The 2005 EU Progress Report stated that: "On 29 July 2005, Turkey signed the Additional Protocol adapting the EC Turkey Association Agreement to the accession of 10 new countries on 1 May 2004. At the same time, Turkey issued a declaration stating that the signature of the Additional Protocol did not amount to recognition of the Republic of Cyprus. On 21 September, the EU adopted a counter-declaration indicating that Turkey's declaration was unilateral, did not form part of the Protocol, and had no legal effect on Turkey's obligations under the Protocol. The EU declaration stressed that recognition of all Member States was a necessary component of the accession process. It also underlined the need for supporting the efforts of the Secretary General of the UN to bring about a comprehensive settlement of the Cyprus problem which would contribute to peace, stability and harmonious relations in the region."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/2005/package/sec_1426_final_progress_report_tr_en.pdf|title=Final Progress Report for Turkey|access-date=13 April 2007|archive-date=30 June 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070630225819/http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/2005/package/sec_1426_final_progress_report_tr_en.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
*{{flagicon|EU}} In November 2006, the European Commission members decided to suspend parts of the talks with Turkey regarding accession, as Turkish officials said that they will not open Turkish ports to traffic from the Republic of Cyprus until the EU eases its embargo on Turkish-controlled northern Cyprus.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6194492.stm|title=EU urged to freeze Turkey talks|access-date=25 August 2008|date=29 November 2006|work=]|archive-date=27 August 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190827135509/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6194492.stm|url-status=live}}</ref>
*{{flagicon|EU}} In 2007, European Commission President ] said that Turkey is not ready to join the EU "tomorrow nor the day after tomorrow", but its membership negotiations should continue. He also called on France and other member states to honour the decision to continue accession talks, describing it as a matter of credibility for the Union.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.setimes.com/cocoon/setimes/xhtml/en_GB/newsbriefs/setimes/newsbriefs/2007/07/23/nb-02|work=Zaman, Javno.hr, DPA, Reuters|publisher=Southeast European Times|date=22 July 2007|title=Barroso says Turkey not ready for EU membership, urges continued negotiations|access-date=24 July 2007|archive-date=27 October 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161027021146/http://www.setimes.com/cocoon/setimes/xhtml/en_GB/newsbriefs/setimes/newsbriefs/2007/07/23/nb-02|url-status=live}}</ref>{{Unreliable source?|date=August 2008}}
*{{flagicon|POR}} On 28 June 2007, Portuguese State Secretary for European Affairs Manuel Lobo Antunes affirmed that "Turkey should join the EU once it has successfully completed membership talks, which are likely to run for at least a decade."<ref name=EUbusinessAntunes>{{cite web|url=http://www.eubusiness.com/Portugal/1183028405.19|title=EUbusiness: Portugal rejects major EU debate on Turkey this year|access-date=5 September 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090827045512/http://www.eubusiness.com/Portugal/1183028405.19|archive-date=27 August 2009}}</ref> "We think it is important and fundamental that Turkey joins the European Union once it fulfils all the conditions and all the criteria," he said, adding that "] aims in the next six months to 'put the process on track'."<ref name=EUbusinessAntunes/>
*{{flagicon|ITA}} On 5 November 2008, the Italian ] ] declared that "the Italian government will support the inclusion of Turkey in the European Union with all its strength."<ref name=Frattini>{{cite web|url=http://www.ansamed.info/en/news/ME01.@AM63924.html|title=ANSAmed: Italy-Turkey: Frattini, We Strongly Support EU Membership |access-date=5 September 2017|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090827052133/http://www.ansamed.info/en/news/ME01.%40AM63924.html |archive-date=27 August 2009}}</ref> He indicated that "the Italian Parliament will give a 'clear word' when necessary with the 'enormous majority' of the ] government, but also with 'the opposition' which it knows it can count on."<ref name=Frattini/> "Turkey's inclusion will not be a problem, but it will be part of the solution for strengthening Europe in relations with other countries, such as the Caucasus region" he added.<ref name=Frattini/>
*{{flagicon|ITA}} On 13 November 2008, the Italian Prime Minister ] urged the EU to "accelerate Turkey's membership bid" and pledged to "help Ankara gain accession."<ref name=EuronewsBerlusconi>{{cite web|url=http://www.euronews.net/2008/11/13/italy-urges-eu-to-speed-up-turkeys-application/|title=Italy urges EU to speed up Turkey's application|work=euronews|access-date=7 June 2015|archive-date=1 September 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180901215931/http://www.euronews.com/2008/11/13/italy-urges-eu-to-speed-up-turkeys-application}}</ref> Berlusconi pledged to "try and win over those EU members resistant to Turkey's application."<ref name=EuronewsBerlusconi/> "Regarding the opposition shown by certain countries – some of which are important countries – I am confident we will be able to convince them of the strategic importance of Turkey, within the European framework, as a country bordering the Middle East," Berlusconi declared.<ref name=EuronewsBerlusconi/>
*{{flagicon|SWE}}/{{flagicon|FRA}} On 29 May 2009, French President Nicolas Sarkozy cancelled a visit to Sweden scheduled for 2 June 2009, to avoid a clash on the question of Turkey's EU membership just a few days before the European elections and a month before Stockholm took over the EU's rotating presidency.<ref name=EUobserverSweden>{{cite web|url=http://euobserver.com/9/28208|title=Sarkozy cancels Sweden visit over Turkey|date=29 May 2009|access-date=7 June 2015|archive-date=28 August 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190828065329/https://euobserver.com/political/28208|url-status=live}}</ref> The French President, who is an outspoken opponent of Turkey's entry to the European Union, did not want to highlight the strong divergence of views on this topic with Swedish Prime Minister ], the French newspaper '']'' reported on 28 May 2009.<ref name=EUobserverSweden/> Sweden favours further EU enlargement, including to Turkey.<ref name=EUobserverSweden/> Swedish ] ] told the French newspaper '']'' that "the EU has 'a strategic interest' in Turkey's EU integration and warned against 'closing the door' to Ankara."<ref name=EUobserverSweden/> "If we judge Cyprus to be in Europe, although it is an island along Syria's shores, it is hard not to consider that Turkey is in Europe," Bildt said, referring to Sarkozy's repeated statements that Turkey is not a European country and does not belong to Europe.<ref name=EUobserverSweden/> In the ''Le Figaro'' interview, Bildt said: "My vision of Europe is not as defensive as I observe it with other people."<ref name=EUobserverSweden/> The French president's trip to Sweden was cancelled the day after the interview was published.<ref name=EUobserverSweden/> "Nicolas Sarkozy cancelled his visit because of the Carl Bildt interview," one French minister told ''Le Monde''.<ref name=EUobserverSweden/> "The president wanted to avoid a clash on Turkey and did not want that his visit to Sweden interferes with the elections ."<ref name=EUobserverSweden/> In March 2013, King ] of Sweden said that "The EU will become stronger with Turkey"<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.abhaber.com/haberler/haber/haberler/isvec-krali-carl-xvi-ab-turkiye-ile-daha-guclu-olacak-048637 |title=ABHaber<!-- Bot generated title -->|access-date=5 September 2017|archive-url= https://archive.today/20130410044838/http://www.abhaber.com/haberler/haber/haberler/isvec-krali-carl-xvi-ab-turkiye-ile-daha-guclu-olacak-048637 |archive-date=10 April 2013}}</ref>
*{{flagicon|ESP}} On 5 April 2009, Spanish Prime Minister ] stated that "Spain firmly supports Turkey's candidature to enter the EU, provided it meets the necessary requisites."<ref name=Zapatero>{{cite web|url= http://www.la-moncloa.es/IDIOMAS/9/ActualidadHome/05042009_RANTurquia.htm |date=5 April 2009 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090826195645/http://www.la-moncloa.es/IDIOMAS/9/ActualidadHome/05042009_RANTurquia.htm |title= La Moncloa – Spanish Government: Spain supports Turkey's candidature to the EU |archive-date=26 August 2009 |website=lamoncloa.gob.es}}</ref> Zapatero told Turkish Prime Minister ] that "Spain's position is 'firm, clear and solid' in favour of Turkey's candidature to enter the European Union."<ref name=Zapatero/> "We must 'open the door' for Turkey to enter 'the EU peace and cooperation project', provided it meets the necessary requisites for integration," Zapatero added;<ref name=Zapatero/> before remarking that "Turkey's entrance is good both for Turkey and for the EU."<ref name=Zapatero/>
*{{flagicon|GRE}} In November 2009, Greek President ] stated that he would not support Turkey's accession "as long as Ankara behaves as an occupying force in Cyprus."<ref>{{cite web | access-date=21 November 2009 | archive-date=20 November 2009 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091120193250/http://www.turkishweekly.net/news/93107/greek-president-39-we-cannot-support-turkey-39-s-membership-to-the-eu-39-.html | url=http://www.turkishweekly.net/news/93107/greek-president-39-we-cannot-support-turkey-39-s-membership-to-the-eu-39-.html | title=Greek President: 'We Cannot Support Turkey's Membership to the EU' }}</ref>
*{{flagicon|UK}} On 4 November 2009, ], the Foreign Secretary of the United Kingdom, during a visit to Turkey underlined the UK government's support for Turkey's bid to join the European Union, saying: "I am very clear that Turkish accession to the EU is important and will be of huge benefit to both Turkey and the EU."<ref name=EUBusinessElizabeth>{{cite web|url= http://ukinturkey.fco.gov.uk/resources/en/news/14024149/21118777/fs-news-041109|title=David Miliband is visiting Turkey on 4 and 5 November |access-date=5 September 2017|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20091112223252/http://ukinturkey.fco.gov.uk/resources/en/news/14024149/21118777/fs-news-041109 |archive-date=12 November 2009}}</ref>
*{{flagicon|UK}} On 27 July 2010, ], former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, during a visit to Turkey promised to "fight" for Turkey's membership of the European Union, saying he is "angry" at the slow pace of negotiations. He added that "a European Union without Turkey at its heart is not stronger but weaker... not more secure but less... not richer but poorer."<ref name=Cameron>{{cite news | url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-10767768 | work=BBC News | title=Cameron 'anger' at slow pace of Turkish EU negotiations | date=27 July 2010 | access-date=20 June 2018 | archive-date=4 January 2021 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210104234645/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-10767768 | url-status=live }}</ref> On 22 May 2016, Cameron said that "it is not remotely on the cards that Turkey is going to join the EU any time soon. They applied in 1987. At the current rate of progress they will probably get round to joining in about the year 3000 according to the latest forecasts."<ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.business-reporter.co.uk/2016/05/23/cameron-turkey-course-join-eu-year-3000/#gsc.tab=0 | work=Business Reporter | title=Cameron: Turkey on course to join EU 'in year 3000' | date=23 May 2016 | access-date=8 May 2019 | archive-date=24 May 2016 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160524132002/http://business-reporter.co.uk/2016/05/23/cameron-turkey-course-join-eu-year-3000/#gsc.tab=0 }}</ref>
*{{flagicon|EU}} On 23 December 2010, President of the European Council ] he said "Turkish reform efforts have delivered impressive results." He continued "Turkey plays an ever more active role in its neighbourhood. Turkey is also a full-standing member of the G-20, just like five EU countries and the EU itself. In my view, even before an outcome of the negotiations, the European Union should develop a close partnership with the Turkish Republic."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sundayszaman.com/sunday/newsDetail_getNewsById.action?newsId=230424 |title=Van Rompuy urges EU for closer partnership with Turkey |publisher=Today's Zaman |date=23 December 2010 |access-date=18 December 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111212200109/http://www.sundayszaman.com/sunday/newsDetail_getNewsById.action?newsId=230424 |archive-date=12 December 2011 |df=dmy-all }}</ref>
*{{flagicon|FIN}} In March 2011, then-Finnish President ] pledged her country's full support for Turkey's European Union membership process.<ref>{{cite web |url = https://yle.fi/a/3-5334101 |title = Halonen lupaa Suomen tukevan Turkin EU-jäsenyyttä |language = fi |date = March 29, 2011 |work = yle.fi |access-date = 22 September 2023 |archive-date = 28 September 2023 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230928210518/https://yle.fi/a/3-5334101 |url-status = live }}</ref>
*{{flagicon|GER}} On 3 July 2013, at an election rally of the Christian Democrat Party in ], German Finance Minister ] stated that Turkey should not join the European Union as it is not part of Europe.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/german-finance-minister-says-turkey-is-not-part-of-europe.aspx?pageID=238&nID=49994&NewsCatID=351 |title=German minister's EU remarks on Turkey 'unacceptable' |publisher=hurriyet daily news |access-date=7 June 2015 |archive-date=4 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170904065023/http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/german-finance-minister-says-turkey-is-not-part-of-europe.aspx?pageID=238&nID=49994&NewsCatID=351 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-turkey-eu-idUSBRE96217U20130703 | work=Reuters | title=German finance minister says Turkey is not part of Europe | date=3 July 2013 | access-date=30 June 2017 | archive-date=4 September 2017 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170904161513/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-turkey-eu/german-finance-minister-says-turkey-is-not-part-of-europe-idUSBRE96217U20130703 | url-status=live }}</ref>
*{{flagicon|TUR}} On 7 June 2013, Turkey's Undersecretary of the Ministry of EU Affairs Haluk Ilıcak said "The process means more than the accession. Once the necessary levels are achieved, Turkey is big enough to continue its development without the accession. Our aim is to achieve a smooth accession process."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkeys-eu-process-an-end-in-itself-says-turkish-diplomat.aspx?pageID=238&nID=48420&NewsCatID=338 |title=Turkey's EU process an end in itself, says Turkish diplomat |publisher=hurriyet daily news |access-date=7 June 2015 |archive-date=8 November 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161108061119/http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkeys-eu-process-an-end-in-itself-says-turkish-diplomat.aspx?pageID=238&nID=48420&NewsCatID=338 |url-status=live }}</ref>
*{{flagicon|CZE}} In 2013, ] Prime Minister ] said: "We continue to believe that Turkey should be given the chance to become a full-fledged member of the European Union after it meets all accession criteria". He described Turkey as an important partner to the EU and praised the constructive role it plays in the Middle East region.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.vlada.cz/en/media-centrum/aktualne/business-between-czech-companies-and-turkey-on-the-rise-103299/|title=Business between Czech companies and Turkey on the rise|access-date=7 June 2015|archive-date=24 January 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160124140130/http://www.vlada.cz/en/media-centrum/aktualne/business-between-czech-companies-and-turkey-on-the-rise-103299/|url-status=live}}</ref>
*{{flagicon|TUR}} In March 2016, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said that democracy and freedom were "phrases" which had "absolutely no value" in Turkey, after calling for journalists, lawyers and politicians to be prosecuted as terrorists.<ref name=erdo1>{{cite web|url= https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/president-erdogan-says-freedom-and-democracy-have-no-value-in-turkey-amid-arrests-and-military-a6938266.html |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160318113440/http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/president-erdogan-says-freedom-and-democracy-have-no-value-in-turkey-amid-arrests-and-military-a6938266.html |archive-date=2016-03-18 |url-access=limited |url-status=live|title=President Erdogan says freedom and democracy have 'no value' in Turkey amid arrests and military crackdown|work=The Independent |date=18 March 2016}}</ref>
*{{flagicon|EU}} In July 2016, European Union High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy ] announced that EU membership negotiations would be terminated if the death penalty was reinstated in Turkey.<ref>{{cite web |url = https://edition.cnn.com/2016/07/18/asia/turkey-attempted-coup/index.html |title = EU: Turkey can't join if it introduces death penalty |language = en |date = July 18, 2016 |work = cnn.com |access-date = 25 September 2023 |archive-date = 28 September 2023 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230928210518/https://edition.cnn.com/2016/07/18/asia/turkey-attempted-coup/index.html |url-status = live }}</ref>
*{{flagicon|AUT}} In August 2016, then-Austrian Chancellor ] called for the suspension of full membership negotiations between the EU and Turkey.<ref>{{cite web |url = https://www.euractiv.com/section/enlargement/news/austrian-chancellor-wants-eu-to-end-accession-talks-with-turkey/ |title = Austrian chancellor wants EU to end accession talks with Turkey |language = en |date = August 4, 2016 |work = euractiv.com |access-date = 29 August 2023 |archive-date = 29 August 2023 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230829144430/https://www.euractiv.com/section/enlargement/news/austrian-chancellor-wants-eu-to-end-accession-talks-with-turkey/ |url-status = live }}</ref>
*{{flagicon|TUR}} In March 2017, in a speech given to supporters in the western Turkish city of Sakarya, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said "my dear brothers, a battle has started between the cross and the half moon" (referring to ] and ] respectively) after insulting European government politicians as "Nazis" in the weeks before.<ref name=erdo2>{{cite web|url=http://www.dw.com/en/erdogan-accuses-eu-of-crusade-against-islam/a-37979126|title=Erdogan accuses EU of 'crusade' against Islam|publisher=Deutsche Welle|date=17 March 2017|access-date=3 September 2017|archive-date=13 December 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201213125852/https://www.dw.com/en/erdogan-accuses-eu-of-crusade-against-islam/a-37979126|url-status=live}}</ref> The same month, he threatened that Europeans would "not be able to walk safely on the streets" if they kept up banning Turkish ministers from addressing rallies in Europe.<ref name=March2017>{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-turkey-referendum-europe-idUSKBN16T13E|title=Erdogan warns Europeans 'will not walk safely' if attitude persists, as row carries on|work=Reuters|date=22 March 2017|access-date=3 September 2017|archive-date=7 April 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200407070629/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-turkey-referendum-europe-idUSKBN16T13E|url-status=live}}</ref> European politicians rejected Erdoğan's comments.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article163207274/Deutsche-Politiker-geben-Zurueckhaltung-gegenueber-Erdogan-auf.html |title=Deutsche Politiker geben Zurückhaltung gegenüber Erdogan auf |newspaper=Die Welt |date=28 March 2017 |access-date=3 September 2017 |archive-date=3 August 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200803091339/https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article163207274/Deutsche-Politiker-geben-Zurueckhaltung-gegenueber-Erdogan-auf.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
*{{flagicon|EU}} In the context of the imminent ] in April 2017, the Vice President of the ], ], summarized the state of affairs as this: "In law Turkey is still a candidate, in fact, it is not. Nobody believes in Brussels or in Ankara for that matter that Turkey will eventually join the European Union. And that is why we say it is better to make a new start and put the relationship on a new foundation."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.euronews.com/2017/04/10/turkey-is-no-longer-an-eu-candidate-mep-says |title=Turkey is no longer an EU candidate, MEP says |date=10 April 2017 |publisher=Euronews |access-date=10 April 2017 |archive-date=10 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200310131012/https://www.euronews.com/2017/04/10/turkey-is-no-longer-an-eu-candidate-mep-says |url-status=live }}</ref>
*{{flagicon|GER}} In a TV debate in September 2017, then-German chancellor ] and her then challenger ] both said that they would seek an end to Turkey's membership talks with the European Union.<ref name=the-end />
*{{flagicon|FIN}} In September 2017, then-Finnish foreign minister ], announced that they were in favor of not stopping Turkey's membership negotiations with the European Union.<ref>{{cite web |url = https://www.ntv.com.tr/dunya/finlandiyadan-turkiyeye-ab-destegi,DGf0jksYW0y5x6qpyjAHCg |title = Finlandiya'dan Türkiye'ye AB desteği |language = tr |date = September 7, 2017 |work = ntv.com.tr |access-date = 23 August 2023 |archive-date = 23 August 2023 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230823092120/https://www.ntv.com.tr/dunya/finlandiyadan-turkiyeye-ab-destegi,DGf0jksYW0y5x6qpyjAHCg |url-status = live }}</ref>
*{{flagicon|AUT}} In December 2017, then-Austrian Chancellor ] announced that they were in favor of stopping Turkey's accession negotiations with the European Union.<ref>{{cite web |url = https://www.dailysabah.com/eu-affairs/2017/12/26/austrian-pm-kurz-calls-to-end-eu-turkey-membership-talks |title = Austrian PM Kurz calls to end EU-Turkey membership talks |language = en |date = December 26, 2017 |work = www.dailysabah.com |access-date = 24 August 2023 |archive-date = 28 September 2024 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20240928031430/https://www.dailysabah.com/eu-affairs/2017/12/26/austrian-pm-kurz-calls-to-end-eu-turkey-membership-talks |url-status = live }}</ref>
*{{flagicon|AUT}} On 17 July 2018, then-Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz, in an interview with the Greek newspaper ], called for ending full membership negotiations between the EU and Turkey and developing relations instead of full membership negotiations. Kurz said: "I have been speaking out for years about developing an honest relationship with Turkey." Kurz continued as follows: "EU membership negotiations with Turkey should be stopped immediately. Turkey has continuously moved away from Europe and its values over the last few years. We should also focus on exploring other forms of cooperation between our neighbors the EU and Turkey."<ref>{{cite web |url = https://www.ekathimerini.com/news/230745/kurz-eu-must-stop-Turkey-accession-talks-immediately/ |title = Kurz: EU must stop Turkey accession talks 'immediately' |language = en |date = July 17, 2018 |website = ekathimerini.com |access-date = 12 June 2024 |archive-date = 12 June 2024 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20240612130121/https://www.ekathimerini.com/news/230745/kurz-eu-must-stop-Turkey-accession-talks-immediately/ |url-status = live }}</ref>
*{{flagicon|AUT}} In September 2023, Austrian Chancellor ], in an interview with the German newspaper ], called for the termination of full membership negotiations between the EU and Turkey and the development of a new concept within the ].<ref>{{cite web |url = https://www.welt.de/politik/ausland/article247392500/Oesterreich-Kanzler-Nehammer-fuer-Ende-der-EU-Beitrittsgespraeche-mit-der-Tuerkei.html |title = Österreich für Ende der EU-Beitrittsgespräche mit der Türkei |language = de |date = September 11, 2023 |work = www.welt.de |access-date = 11 September 2023 |archive-date = 25 July 2024 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20240725001511/https://www.welt.de/politik/ausland/article247392500/Oesterreich-Kanzler-Nehammer-fuer-Ende-der-EU-Beitrittsgespraeche-mit-der-Tuerkei.html |url-status = live }}</ref>
*{{flagicon|TUR}} In September 2023, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan announced that the European Union was well into a rupture in its ] and that they could part ways, if necessary, during Turkey's European Union membership process.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/turkeys-erdogan-says-country-could-part-ways-with-eu-if-necessary-2023-09-16/|title=Turkey could part ways with EU if necessary, Erdogan says|publisher=Reuters|date=16 September 2023|access-date=16 September 2023|archive-date=18 September 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230918150629/https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/turkeys-erdogan-says-country-could-part-ways-with-eu-if-necessary-2023-09-16/|url-status=live}}</ref>

== See also ==
{{Portal|Turkey|European Union}}
* ]
* ]
* ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]

== Notes ==
{{notelist}}

== References ==
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}

== External links ==
<!-- Please do not add news articles here; cite them instead. See the talk page for a long list to choose from. -->
{{Wikisource|Recommendation of the European Commission on Turkey's progress towards accession}}
*
* , ].
* , ].
*
*
*

{{European Union candidates}}
{{Foreign relations of Turkey}}
{{External relations of the European Union}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Accession Of Turkey To The European Union}}
]
]

Latest revision as of 13:40, 26 December 2024

This article is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Misplaced Pages editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic. Please help improve it by rewriting it in an encyclopedic style. (November 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Process of Turkey joining the EU This article is about accession negotiations process. For the broad perspective on relations between the European Union and Turkey, see European Union–Turkey relations.

Accession of Turkey to the European Union
StatusFrozen negotiations
Application
Membership application14 April 1987
Screened & negotiations commence
Negotiations
Chapters closed
3% complete
Memberships & Treaties
Association Agreement
Economic and monetary policy
Travel
Energy
Foreign and military policy
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)Turkey became a member of NATO on 18 February 1952
Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE)Member since 25 June 1973
Human rights and international courts
Council of Europe (CoE)Türkiye became a member of the Council of Europe on 13 April 1950
International Criminal Court (ICC)Türkiye is not a party to the Rome Statute, the founding treaty of the International Criminal Court
International Court of Justice (ICJ)
Impact (27+1)
Population446,828,803527,863,413
(+18.70%)
Area4,233,262 km
1,634,472 mi
5,164,938
(+17.88%)
HDI0.896
GDP (PPP)$25.399 trillion
GDP per capita (PPP)$56,928
GDP$17.818 trillion20,253
(+13.90%)
GDP per capita$39,940
Gini30.0
Official Languages2425
(+1) (Turkish)
This article is part of a series about the
Turkey in Europe

Turkey and the European Union Turkish Institutions for EU Affairs

Turkish–European Integration Foreign and Military Policies Economic Science Aviation and Transportation Sports Media Infrastructure and Entertainment

Historical
map Europe portal
flag Turkey portal
flag European Union portal

Turkey is negotiating its accession to the European Union (EU) as a member state, following its application to become a full member of the European Economic Community (EEC), the predecessor of the EU, on 14 April 1987.

After the ten founding members in 1949, Turkey became one of the first new members (the 13th member) of the Council of Europe in 1950. The country became an associate member of the European Economic Community (EEC) in 1963 and was an associate member of the Western European Union from 1992 to its end in 2011. Turkey signed a Customs Union agreement with the EU in 1995 and was officially recognised as a candidate for full membership on 12 December 1999, at the Helsinki summit of the European Council.

Negotiations for full membership were started on 3 October 2005. Progress was slow: out of the 35 chapters necessary to complete the accession process, only 16 had been opened and one had been closed by May 2016. The early 2016 refugee deal between Turkey and the European Union was intended to accelerate negotiations after previous stagnation and allow visa-free travel through Europe for Turks.

Since 2016, accession negotiations have stalled. The EU has accused and criticized Turkey for human rights violations and deficits in rule of law. In 2017, EU officials said that the strong presidency created by the 2017 Turkish constitutional referendum would violate the Copenhagen criteria of eligibility for an EU membership.

On 20 February 2019, a European parliament committee voted to suspend the accession talks, sparking criticism from the government of Turkey. Turkey's accession negotiations have therefore effectively come to a standstill and no further chapters can be considered for opening or closing and no further work towards the modernisation of the EU-Turkey Customs Union is foreseen.

On 30 January 2023, the Table of Six (then-main opposition alliance) in Turkey released a memorandum of understanding for common policies. It re-affirmed the opposition's intent to continue the EU accession talks if they were to be elected in that year's elections. It is one of nine current EU candidate countries, together with Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia, Moldova, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Serbia, and Ukraine.

History

Main article: European Union–Turkey relations

Background

Palace of Europe in Strasbourg, seat of the Council of Europe, which Turkey joined on 13 April 1950

After the Ottoman Empire's collapse following World War I, Turkish revolutionaries led by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk emerged victorious in the Turkish War of Independence, establishing the modern Turkish Republic as it exists today. Atatürk, President of Turkey, implemented a series of reforms, including secularisation and industrialisation, intended to "Europeanise" or Westernise the country. During World War II, Turkey remained neutral until February 1945, when it joined the Allies. The country took part in the Marshall Plan of 1947, became a member of the Council of Europe in 1950, and a member of NATO in 1952. During the Cold War, Turkey allied itself with the United States and Western Europe. The Turkish position vis-à-vis Europe has been characterized as "Europe has been an object of desire as well as a source of frustration for Turkish national identity in a long and strained history".

Brief history of major events

Timeline
Date Event
13 December 1997 Luxembourg Council declares Turkey eligible to become an EU member.
11 December 1999 Helsinki Summit European Council declares Turkey a candidate country.
24 March 2001 Council adopts Accession Partnership for Turkey.
19 May 2003 Council adopts revised Accession Partnership for Turkey.
16 December 2004 European Council declares that Turkey sufficiently fulfils the criteria for opening accession negotiations beginning in October 2005.
3 October 2005 Council adopts negotiating framework and negotiations are formally opened. Screening process begins.
1 June 2006 Negotiations are opened and closed on Chapter 25 – Science and Research.
11 December 2006 Because Turkey refused to apply to Cyprus the Additional Protocol to the Ankara Agreement, Council decides that eight chapters will not be opened. Main article: Cyprus dispute
19 February 2008 Council adopts revised Accession Partnership for Turkey.
30 June 2010 Negotiations are opened on Chapter 12 – Food Safety, Veterinary and Phytosanitary Policy.
17 May 2012 Positive Agenda intended to bring fresh dynamics into the EU-Turkey relations was launched.
5 November 2013 Negotiations are opened on Chapter 22 – Regional Policy and Coordination of Structural Instruments.
16 December 2013 Visa liberalisation dialogue launched and EU-Turkey Readmission Agreement signed.
29 November 2015 First EU-Turkey Summit held and Joint EU-Turkey Action Plan activated. The EU welcomes Turkey's commitment to accelerate the fulfilment of the Visa Roadmap benchmarks in return for halting the flow of Syrian refugees from Turkey to Greece.
14 December 2015 Negotiations are opened on Chapter 17 – Economic and Monetary Policy.
30 June 2016 Negotiations are opened on Chapter 33 – Financial and Budgetary Provisions.
24 November 2016 MEPs vote overwhelmingly to suspend negotiations with Turkey over human rights and rule of law concerns.
6 July 2017 EU parliament called for the suspension of accession negotiations with Turkey.
20 February 2019 EU parliament committee votes to suspend accession talks with Turkey.
13 March 2019 The European Parliament unanimously accepted the call for the suspension of full membership negotiations between the EU and Turkey.
19 May 2021 The European Parliament unanimously accepted the call for the suspension of accession negotiations between the EU and Turkey.

1950s–1990s

Turkey first applied for associate membership in the European Economic Community in 1959, and on 12 September 1963 signed the "Agreement Creating An Association Between The Republic of Turkey and the European Economic Community", also known as the Ankara Agreement. This agreement came into effect the following year on 12 December 1964. The Ankara Agreement sought to integrate Turkey into a customs union with the EEC whilst acknowledging the final goal of membership. In November 1970, a further protocol called the "Additional Protocol" established a timetable for the abolition of tariffs and quotas on goods traded between Turkey and the EEC.

On 14 April 1987, Turkey submitted its application for formal membership into the European Economic Community. The European Commission responded in December 1989 by confirming Ankara's eventual membership but also by deferring the matter to more favourable times, citing Turkey's economic and political situation, as well its poor relations with Greece and the conflict with Cyprus as creating an unfavourable environment with which to begin negotiations. This position was confirmed again in the Luxembourg European Council of 1997 in which accession talks were started with central and eastern European states and Cyprus, but not Turkey. During the 1990s, Turkey proceeded with closer integration with the European Union by agreeing to a customs union in 1995. In 1999, following the Greek-Turkish earthquake diplomacy, Greece lifted its opposition to Turkey's accession to the European Union. Moreover, the Helsinki Summit European Council of 1999 proved a milestone as the EU recognised Turkey as a candidate on equal footing with other potential candidates.

2000s

The next significant step in EU–Turkey relations came with the December 2002 Copenhagen European Council. According to it, "the EU would open negotiations with Turkey 'without delay' if the European Council in December 2004, on the basis of a report and a recommendation from the Commission, decides that Turkey fulfills the Copenhagen political criteria." French President Jacques Chirac and German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder expressed joint support for the December 2004 European Commission summit meeting agenda for Turkey joining the European Union.

The European Commission recommended that the negotiations should begin in 2005, but also added various precautionary measures. The EU leaders agreed on 16 December 2004 to start accession negotiations with Turkey from 3 October 2005. While Austria and Germany initially wanted to leave open the possibility that negotiations with Turkey would lead to a privileged partnership, less than full membership, accession negotiations were ultimately launched with the "shared objective" of membership.

Turkey's accession talks have since been stalled by a number of domestic and external problems. Both Austria and France have said they would hold a referendum on Turkey's accession. In the case of France, a change in its Constitution was made to impose such a referendum, but later another constitutional change has enabled the parliament (if a large majority of its members agrees) to prevent such a referendum. The issue of Cyprus continues to be a major obstacle to negotiations. European officials have commented on the slowdown in Turkish reforms which, combined with the Cyprus problem, led the EU's Enlargement Commissioner Olli Rehn in March 2007 to warn of an impending 'train crash' in the negotiations. Due to these setbacks, negotiations again came to a halt in December 2006, with the EU freezing talks in 8 of the 35 key areas under negotiation.

In 2007, Turkey stated that they were aiming to comply with EU law by 2013, but Brussels refused to back that as a deadline for membership. In 2006 President of the European Commission José Manuel Barroso said that the accession process will take at least until 2021. In a visit to Germany on 31 October 2012, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan made clear that Turkey was expecting membership in the Union to be realised by 2023, the 100th Anniversary of the Turkish Republic, implying that they could end membership negotiations if the talks had not yielded a positive result by then. Turkish President Abdullah Gül said that upon completing the accession process Turkey will hold a referendum for Turkish membership in the European Union.

In December 2009, EU member the Republic of Cyprus blocked 6 chapters of Turkish accession negotiations, including those on Judiciary and Fundamental Rights, Energy and Education and Culture, arguing that Turkey needs to first normalise relations with Cyprus. As a result, no chapters have been opened since June 2010. Hence, there is no chapter Turkey could open other than the difficult and economically detrimental chapters Competition Policy, Social Policy and Employment, and Public Procurement that most candidate countries open at the end of accession as all other chapters were blocked. In February 2013, Turkish Deputy Undersecretary of the Ministry for EU Affairs, Burak Erdenir, claimed that the EU had yet to communicate to Turkey the benchmark criteria for opening chapters 23 and 24, Judiciary & Fundamental Rights and Justice, Freedom & Security, which was to be done after screening of the chapters was completed in 2006, thus making it impossible to comply with them. He also suggested this was a deliberate attempt to slow their accession process.

Positive agenda (2012–13)

After over two years of no chapter openings, the European Commission set up a "Positive Agenda" designed to focus on common EU-Turkey interests. EU Commissioner for expansion Stefan Füle describes that the goal was "to keep the accession process alive and put it properly back on track after a period of stagnation which has been a source of frustration for both sides." The EU Commission mentioned a broad range of areas as the main elements of the Agenda such as "intensified dialogue and cooperation on political reforms", "visa", "mobility and migration", "energy", "fight against terrorism", "further participation of Turkey in Community programmes", "town twinning", "trade and the Customs Union" and "supporting efforts to align with the acquis, including on chapters where accession negotiations cannot be opened for the time being". The proposal was considered favorably on the condition that it serves as an instrument in support of and complementary to the negotiation process with the EU.

In the framework of "Positive Agenda", Working Groups were established on 8 chapters ("3-Right of Establishment and Freedom to Provide Services", "6-Company Law", "10-Information Society and Media", "18-Statistics", "23-Judiciary and Fundamental Rights", "24-Justice, Freedom and Security", "28-Consumer and Health Protection", and "32-Financial Control"). The "Positive Agenda" kick-off meeting was held on 17 May 2012 in Ankara with the participation of Stefan Füle, EU Commissioner for Enlargement and European Neighbourhood Policy. As a result of the Working Groups meetings held so far, a total of four closing benchmarks were confirmed to have been met by Turkey in three chapters (Company Law, Consumer and Health Protection as well as Financial Control chapters).

On 20 June 2013, in the wake of Ankara's crackdown on mass demonstrations in Taksim Square, Germany blocked the start to new EU accession talks with Turkey. According to the Financial Times, one Turkish official said that such a move could potentially break off political relations with the bloc.

A Eurobarometer poll which included EU countries and candidate countries as well, showed that 43% of Turks viewed the EU positively, as compared with 60% six months previously. In the same poll, 29% of Turks polled expressed support for an EU Constitution, the lowest level of support among EU countries and candidates polled. Germany said that its reservation stems from a technical issue, but then-Chancellor Angela Merkel, an opponent of Turkish entry into the EU, described herself as "shocked" after Ankara's use of overwhelming police force against mostly peaceful demonstrators. France stated that they would not waive their veto over unfreezing four accession chapters with Turkey until after the elections for the European Parliament in June 2014.

Stalled talks (2016–present)

Following President Erdoğan's crackdown on supporters of the 2016 Turkish coup d'état attempt, EU relations became damaged. Erdoğan has indicated his approval of reinstating the death penalty to punish those involved in the coup, with the EU suggesting that this would end its EU ambitions. On 26 July 2016, European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker announced that Turkey's EU membership process would come to an end if the death penalty was returned in Turkey. Erdoğan stated in November 2016 that he was considering putting Turkey's continued negotiations with the EU on membership to a referendum in 2017. In November 2016, the European Parliament voted in favour of a non-binding resolution to request that the European Commission temporarily suspend membership negotiations due to the "disproportionate repressive measures" of the government to the coup. On 13 December, the European Council (comprising the heads of state or government of the member states) resolved that it would open no new areas in Turkey's membership talks in the "prevailing circumstances"; Turkey's path toward autocratic rule makes progress on EU accession impossible. In 2016, EU member Austria opposed Turkey's EU membership.

In April 2017, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) voted to reopen its monitoring procedure against Turkey. This vote is widely understood to deal a major blow to Turkey's prospect of eventual EU membership, as exiting that process was made a precondition of EU accession negotiations back in 2004. In June 2017, members of the European Parliament expressed that the strong presidency created by the 2017 Turkish constitutional referendum violate the Copenhagen criteria of eligibility for an EU membership. On 6 July 2017, the European Parliament approved a resolution calling for the suspension of full membership negotiations between the EU and Turkey.

The European Commission's long-term budget proposal for the 2021–2027 period released in May 2018 included pre-accession funding for a Western Balkan Strategy for further enlargement, but omitted Turkey.

In March 2018, Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz opposed Turkey's EU accession talks and urged it to halt membership talks. On 26 June 2018, the EU's General Affairs Council stated that "the Council notes that Turkey has been moving further away from the European Union. Turkey's accession negotiations have therefore effectively come to a standstill and no further chapters can be considered for opening or closing and no further work towards the modernisation of the EU-Turkey Customs Union is foreseen." The Council added that it is "especially concerned about the continuing and deeply worrying backsliding on the rule of law and on fundamental rights including the freedom of expression."

On 20 February 2019, a European parliament committee voted to suspend the accession talks, sparking criticism from the government of Turkey. On 13 March 2019, the European Parliament unanimously voted for a halt to the full membership negotiations between the EU and Turkey. On 19 May 2021, the European Parliament unanimously accepted the call for the suspension of accession negotiations between the EU and Turkey. In July 2023, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan brought up Turkey's EU membership application during a NATO summit in Vilnius, linking it to Sweden's accession to NATO. According to Dagens Nyheter's data, in September 2023, 60% of Swedes said that Sweden opposes Turkey's EU membership and will not support the membership process, while 7% said that Sweden does not oppose Turkey's EU membership and will support the membership process.

Negotiation progress

Table of chapters

Screening, chapter, clusters, & freezing dates
Acquis chapter Screening started Screening completed Cluster Opened Chapter Opened Chapter frozen Chapter unfrozen Cluster Closed Chapter Closed
1. Free Movement of Goods 16 January 2006 24 February 2006 11 December 2006
2. Freedom of Movement For Workers 19 July 2006 11 September 2006 8 December 2009
3. Right of Establishment & Freedom To Provide Services 21 November 2005 20 December 2005 11 December 2006
4. Free Movement of Capital 25 November 2005 22 December 2005 19 December 2008
5. Public Procurement 7 November 2005 28 November 2005
6. Company Law 21 June 2006 20 July 2006 17 June 2008
7. Intellectual Property Law 6 February 2006 3 March 2006 17 June 2008
8. Competition Policy 8 November 2005 2 December 2005
9. Financial Services 29 March 2006 3 May 2006 11 December 2006
10. Information Society & Media 12 June 2006 14 July 2006 19 December 2008
11. Agriculture & Rural Development 5 December 2005 26 January 2006 11 December 2006
12. Food Safety, Veterinary & Phytosanitary Policy 9 March 2006 28 April 2006 30 June 2010
13. Fisheries 24 February 2006 31 March 2006 11 December 2006
14. Transport Policy 26 June 2006 28 September 2006 11 December 2006
15. Energy 15 May 2006 16 June 2006 8 December 2009
16. Taxation 6 June 2006 12 July 2006 30 June 2009
17. Economic & Monetary Policy 16 February 2006 23 March 2006 14 December 2015 25 June 2007 14 December 2015
18. Statistics 19 June 2006 18 July 2006 25 June 2007
19. Social Policy & Employment 8 February 2006 22 March 2006
20. Enterprise & Industrial Policy 27 March 2006 5 May 2006 29 March 2007
21. Trans-European Networks 30 June 2006 29 September 2006 19 December 2007
22. Regional Policy & Coordination of Structural Instruments 11 September 2006 10 October 2006 5 November 2013 25 June 2007 12 February 2013
23. Judiciary & Fundamental Rights 7 September 2006 13 October 2006 8 December 2009
24. Justice, Freedom & Security 23 January 2006 15 February 2006 8 December 2009
25. Science & Research 20 October 2005 14 November 2005 12 June 2006 12 June 2006
26. Education & Culture 26 October 2005 16 November 2005 8 December 2009
27. Environment & Climate Change 3 April 2006 2 June 2006 21 December 2009
28. Consumer & Health Protection 8 June 2006 11 July 2006 19 December 2007
29. Customs Union 31 January 2006 14 March 2006 11 December 2006
30. External Relations 10 July 2006 13 September 2006 11 December 2006
31. Foreign, Security & Defence Policy 14 September 2006 6 October 2006 8 December 2009
32. Financial Control 18 May 2006 30 June 2006 26 July 2007
33. Financial & Budgetary Provisions 6 September 2006 4 October 2006 30 June 2016 25 June 2007 18 March 2016
34. Institutions
35. Other Issues
Progress 33 of 33 33 of 33 0 of 13 16 of 33 17 of 33 3 of 17 1 of 33 1 of 13
  1. ^ The EU Council froze the opening of eight chapters over Turkey's rejection to open its ports and airports to traffic from Cyprus in 2006
  2. ^ Some of the chapters do not proceed to the next stage in the process, because they are blocked by Cyprus.
  3. ^ France blocked some chapters from proceeding to the next stage of the process, but subsequently lifted their veto.

Timeline of chapters

Report history for Turkey's ability to assume the obligations of EU membership

Report history 2003–2004

  totally incompatible   early stage   considerable efforts needed   some level of preparation   further efforts needed   moderately advanced   good level of preparation   advanced   well advanced


† This chart does not indicate chapters which have been provisionally closed and/or chapters which have been frozen.

‡ Prior to the 2004 enlargement of the European Union, there were thirty-one chapters of the acquis communautaire.

Acquis chapter 2003 2004
1. Free Movement of Goods Considerable efforts needed Considerable efforts needed
2. Freedom Movement of Persons Considerable efforts needed Early stage
3. Freedom to Provide Services Considerable efforts needed Considerable efforts needed
4. Free Movement of Capital Further efforts needed Considerable efforts needed
5. Company Law Early stage Considerable efforts needed
6. Competition Policy Further efforts needed Further efforts needed
7. Agriculture Further efforts needed Considerable efforts needed
8. Fisheries Considerable efforts needed Considerable efforts needed
9. Transport Policy Early stage Considerable efforts needed
10. Taxation Further efforts needed Considerable efforts needed
11. Economic and Monetary Union Early stage Considerable efforts needed
12. Statistics Further efforts needed Considerable efforts needed
13. Social Policy and Employment Considerable efforts needed Considerable efforts needed
14. Energy Further efforts needed Further efforts needed
15. Industrial Policy Further efforts needed Moderately advanced
16. Small and Medium-sized Companies Further efforts needed Moderately advanced
17. Science and Research Further efforts needed Further efforts needed
18. Education and Training Moderately advanced Further efforts needed
19. Telecommunication and Information Technologies Considerable efforts needed Moderately advanced
20. Culture and Audio-visual Policy Considerable efforts needed Considerable efforts needed
21. Regional Policy and Coordination of Structural Instruments Considerable efforts needed Considerable efforts needed
22. Environment Considerable efforts needed Early stage
23. Consumer and Health Protection Moderately advanced Further efforts needed
24. Cooperation in the Field of Justice and Home Affairs Further efforts needed Further efforts needed
25. Customs Union Moderately advanced Moderately advanced
26. External Relations Moderately advanced Moderately advanced
27. Common Foreign and Security Policy Moderately advanced Moderately advanced
28. Financial Control Further efforts needed Considerable efforts needed
29. Financial and Budgetary Provisions Further efforts needed Further efforts needed
30. Institutions Further efforts needed Further efforts needed
31. Others Further efforts needed Further efforts needed

  totally incompatible   early stage   considerable efforts needed   some level of preparation   further efforts needed   moderately advanced   good level of preparation   advanced   well advanced


† This chart does not indicate chapters which have been provisionally closed and/or chapters which have been frozen.

‡ Prior to the 2004 enlargement of the European Union there were thirty-one chapters of the acquis communautaire.

Report history 2005–2024

  totally incompatible   early stage   considerable efforts needed   some level of preparation   further efforts needed   moderately advanced   good level of preparation   advanced   well advanced


† This chart does not indicate chapters which have been provisionally closed and/or chapters which have been frozen.

‡ After the 2004 enlargement of the European Union four more chapters were added and/or restructured, bringing the total number of acquis communautaire chapters to 35.

Clusters Acquis chapter 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Cluster 1: Fundamentals 23. Judiciary and Fundamental Rights Further efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage
24. Justice, Freedom, and Security Further efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Early stage Early stage Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced
5. Public Procurement Further efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Further efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced
18. Statistics Considerable efforts needed Some level of preparation Moderately advanced Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Advanced Advanced Good level of preparation Advanced Advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced
32. Financial Control Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Moderately advanced Good level of preparation Moderately advanced Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation
Cluster 2: Internal Market 1. Free Movement of Goods Considerable efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Advanced Advanced Advanced Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation
2. Freedom of Movement for Workers Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage
3. Right of Establishment and Freedom to Provide Services Considerable efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage
4. Free Movement of Capital Further efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Early stage Early stage Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced
6. Company Law Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Moderately advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced
7. Intellectual Property Law Further efforts needed Moderately advanced Early stage Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Advanced Advanced Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation
8. Competition Policy Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation
9. Financial Services Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Good level of preparation Advanced Advanced Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation
28. Consumer and Health Protection Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Moderately advanced Further efforts needed Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation
Cluster 3: Competitiveness and inclusive growth 10. Information Society and Media Considerable efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation
16. Taxation Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced
17. Economic and Monetary Policy Considerable efforts needed Further efforts needed Moderately advanced Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Advanced Advanced Advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation
19. Social Policy and Employment Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation
20. Enterprise and Industrial Policy Further efforts needed Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Advanced Good level of preparation Moderately advanced Advanced Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced
25. Science and Research Further efforts needed Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced
26. Education and Culture Further efforts needed Well advanced Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Well advanced Moderately advanced Further efforts needed Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced
29. Customs Union Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Advanced Advanced Advanced Good level of preparation Some level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Good level of preparation
Cluster 4: Green Agenda and Sustainable Connectivity 14. Transport Policy Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Moderately advanced Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced
15. Energy Further efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced
21. Trans-European Networks Early stage Early stage Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Advanced Further efforts needed Advanced Moderately advanced Advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced Well advanced
27. Environment and Climate Change Early stage Early stage Considerable efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Moderately advanced Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation
Cluster 5: Resources, Agriculture and Cohesion 11. Agriculture and Rural Development Considerable efforts needed Early stage Early stage Early stage Considerable efforts needed Further efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Moderately advanced Early stage Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation
12. Food Safety, Veterinary, and Phytosanitary Policy Considerable efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Early stage Further efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Early stage Moderately advanced Early stage Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation
13. Fisheries Early stage Early stage Considerable efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Early stage Further efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced
22. Regional Policy and Coordination of Structural Instruments Considerable efforts needed Moderately advanced Considerable efforts needed Considerable efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced
33. Financial and Budgetary Provisions Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Early stage Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation
Cluster 6: External Relations 30. External Relations Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Further efforts needed Moderately advanced Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Advanced Good level of preparation Good level of preparation Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced
31. Foreign, Security, and Defence Policy Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Moderately advanced Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation Some level of preparation
Others 34. Institutions Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed
35. Other Issues Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed Further efforts needed

  totally incompatible   early stage   considerable efforts needed   some level of preparation   further efforts needed   moderately advanced   good level of preparation   advanced   well advanced


† This chart does not indicate chapters which have been provisionally closed and/or chapters which have been frozen.

‡ After the 2004 enlargement of the European Union, four more chapters were added and/or restructured, bringing the total number of acquis communautaire chapters to 35.

Pre-accession support to Turkey

Main article: European Union–Turkey relations § EU pre-accession support to Turkey

The European Commission's long-term budget proposal for the 2021-2027 period released in May 2018 included pre-accession funding for a Western Balkan Strategy for further enlargement, but omitted Turkey.

Expected impact of joining

Effect upon the EU

Global map of Europe (light green) and Turkey (dark green)

The problem of Turkey's membership of the EU is compounded by conflicting views as to what the EU should ultimately become. This has played a significant role in the debate, due in part to the European debt crisis and the fact that as a result of this the eurozone and the EU overall is more federalised on both fiscal, legal and political levels than it was at the time of Turkey's application or at the time that Turkey was accepted as a candidate. Generally those members of the EU who support a rights-based free trade bloc do not oppose Turkey as adamantly as those who support a broader political union. The latter, in particular, were concerned that unification would be frustrated and the European project threatened by Turkey's inclusion.

Proponents of Turkey's membership argue that Turkey's geographical location will contribute to peace. According to the Swedish foreign minister, Carl Bildt, "the accession of Turkey would give the EU a decisive role for stability in the eastern part of the Mediterranean and the Black Sea, which is clearly in the strategic interest of Europe". Poland is a key supporter for Turkey's bid to join the EU, while the United Kingdom has expressed support previously, but not since leaving the EU.

Upon joining the EU, Turkey's 83 million inhabitants would bestow the largest number of MEPs in the European Parliament. Turkey now has a larger population than Germany. However, a single country can only hold a maximum of 96 seats in the European Parliament.

The Nabucco, TANAP, TAP and ITGI pipelines will deliver natural gas from the Caspian Sea basin to the EU member states.

Turkey's membership would also affect future enlargement plans, especially the number of nations seeking EU membership, grounds on which Valéry Giscard d'Estaing has opposed Turkey's admission. Giscard has suggested that it would lead to demands for accession by Morocco. Morocco's application is already rejected for "not being a European country"; Turkey, unlike Morocco, has 3% of its territory in Europe. The vast majority of its population lives in the Asian side of the country. On the other hand, the country's largest city, Istanbul, lies mostly in Europe. On the other hand, Cyprus, which is geographically located in Asia, joined the European Union in 2004. French President Nicolas Sarkozy stated in January 2007 that "enlarging Europe with no limit risks destroying European political union, and that I do not accept ... I want to say that Europe must give itself borders, that not all countries have a vocation to become members of Europe, beginning with Turkey which has no place inside the European Union."

EU member states must unanimously agree on Turkey's membership for the Turkish accession to be successful. A number of nations may oppose it; notably Austria; Germany (former chancellor Angela Merkel has long rejected Turkey's accession bid, and has proposed a "privileged partnership" instead); and France (where some are anxious at the prospect of a new wave of Muslim immigrants, given the country's already large Muslim community).

Negotiations to remove the French constitutional requirement for a compulsory referendum on all EU accessions after Croatia resulted in a new proposal to require a compulsory referendum on the accession of any country with a population of more than 5% of the EU's total population; this clause would mainly apply to Turkey and Ukraine.

The current situation according to the French constitution is as follows: if 3⁄5 of the delegates (from the Senate and the Parliament) agree to the accession of Turkey, there will be no referendum.

Benefits to Turkey

Upon accession to the EU, Turkey expects to receive economic development aid. There is also an expectation that there will be an increase in European foreign investment in the Turkish economy, further driving economic growth. During potential economic crisis events, Turkey could benefit from EU assistance.

Free movement of people across the EU will give many Turkish people the opportunity to migrate to other parts of Europe in search of work, or a higher standard of living. The option of migration out of Turkey will inevitably ease tensions in the east of the country, as the prospect of a better standard of living will tend to cool separatist tendencies. However, there have been problems concerning irregular transit migration through Turkey to the EU.

Some secularists in Turkey envisage that the accession of Turkey will contribute to the spread of secular western values in Turkey. Conversely, some non-secularists in Turkey envisage that accession will contribute to the further growth and acceptance of Islam in Europe. The EU accession bid has stimulated Turkey's political and legal reforms and intensified the democratisation process.

Given Turkey's large and growing population, Turkey will have a correspondingly large representation in the European Parliament (2nd and equal with Germany, with 96 seats in EU parliament). This will give Turkey a strong direct influence over EU policies.

Turkish membership issues

Economy

Main article: Economy of Turkey See also: European Union–Turkey Customs Union
A view of Dolmabahçe Palace and the skyline of Levent business district from the Bosphorus strait in Istanbul, the largest city and economic capital of Turkey, and the former capital of the Roman (330–395), Byzantine (395–1204 and 1261–1453), Latin (1204–1261) and Ottoman (1453–1922) Empires.

Turkey has the world's 11th largest GDP-PPP and 17th largest Nominal GDP. The country is a founding member of the OECD and the G-20 major economies.

Beko and Vestel are among the largest producers of consumer electronics and home appliances in Europe.

Turkey has taken advantage of a customs union with the European Union, signed in 1995, to increase its industrial production destined for exports, while at the same time benefiting from EU-origin foreign investment into the country. In 2008, Turkey's exports reached US$141.8 billion (main export partners: Germany 11.2%, UK 8%, Italy 6.95%, France 5.6%, Spain 4.3%, US 3.88%; total EU exports 56.5%.) However, larger imports amounting to about US$204.8 billion threaten the balance of trade (main import partners: Russia 13.8%, Germany 10.3%, China 7.8%, Italy 6%, USA 4.8%, France 4.6%, Iran 3.9%, UK 3.2%; total EU imports 40.4%; total Asia imports 27%).

The opening of talks regarding the Economic and Monetary Policy acquis chapter of Turkey's accession bid was expected to begin in June 2007, but were stalled by France. Turkey became the European Union's fifth-largest trade partner in 2015 according to data released by Eurostat.

Turkey is set to receive EUR 9.2bn from the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance, a funding mechanism for EU candidate countries.

Population

Further information: Demographics of Turkey
İstiklal Avenue in Istanbul's cosmopolitan Beyoğlu district is visited by an average of 3 million people on weekend days.

As of 2005, the population of Turkey stood at 71.5 million with a yearly growth rate of 1.5%. The Turkish population is relatively young, with 25.5% falling within the 0–15 age bracket. As of February 2023, the population of Turkey is approximately 87 million people.

Turkey's large population could alter the balance of power in the representative European institutions. Upon joining the EU, Turkey would be allocated the largest number of MEPs in the European Parliament. This is because the European Parliament distributes seats to member states according to their population. Therefore, if Turkey is admitted, it could influence the EU legislation and administration in line with its own policies.

If Turkey were to join the European Union, Istanbul would become the most populous metropolis in the EU (as of 2004).

Foreign relations with EU member states

Main article: Foreign relations of Turkey

Turkey has no diplomatic relations with Cyprus Cyprus as Turkey does not recognize the government of the Republic of Cyprus.

Cyprus

Further information: Cyprus problem

Cyprus was divided when, on 20 July 1974, Turkey invaded and occupied a third of the island in response to an Athens-engineered coup aimed at annexing Cyprus to Greece. Since then, Turkey has refused to acknowledge the Republic of Cyprus (an EU member since 2004) as the sole authority on the island, and recognizes the self-declared Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus since its establishment in 1983. The Turkish invasion in 1974 and the resulting movement of refugees along both sides of the Green Line, and the establishment of the self-declared Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus in 1983, form the core issues which surround the ongoing Cyprus dispute.

Turkey and the Turkish Cypriots backed the 2004 Annan Plan for Cyprus aimed at the reunification of the island, but the plan was subsequently rejected by Greek Cypriots on the grounds that it did not meet their needs. According to Greek Cypriots, the latest proposal included maintained residence rights for the many Anatolian Turks who moved to Cyprus after the invasion (and their descendants who were born on the island after 1974), while the Greek Cypriots who lost their property after the Turkish invasion would be granted only a restricted right of return to the north following the island's proposed reunification. Although the outcome received much criticism in the EU as well, the Republic of Cyprus was admitted into the EU a week after the referendum.

The self-declared Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus has been recognised only by Turkey since its establishment in 1983. In 2004, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) gave observer status (without voting rights) to the representatives of the Turkish Cypriot community.

The Turkish government has refused to officially recognise the Republic of Cyprus until the removal of the political and economic blockade on the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. Turkey's non-recognition of the Republic of Cyprus has led to complications within the Customs Union. Under the customs agreements which Turkey had already signed as a precondition to start EU membership negotiations in 2005, it is obliged to open its ports to Cypriot planes and vessels, but Turkey has not complied so far; refusing to do so until the EU eases the international isolation of Northern Cyprus. In February 2013, Turkish EU Minister Egemen Bağış told the Republic of Cyprus, "if you truly want salvation, truly want peace, then remove your blockade of Ercan Airport to EU member countries and Turkey will open its ports to you."

Turkey's refusal to implement a trade pact between Turkey and the EU that requires the Turkish government to allow Greek Cypriot vessels to use its air and seaports has prompted the EU to freeze eight chapters in Turkey's accession talks.

In November 2009, Turkish Deputy Prime Minister Cemil Çiçek declared that, should Turkey be forced to choose between supporting either EU membership or Turkish Cypriots, " Turkey's choice will forever be to stand next to the Turkish Cypriots. Everybody should understand this."

Greece

Further information: Greece–Turkey relations

The issue of Turkish membership has been contentious in Greece. An opinion poll from 2005 suggested that only 25% of Greeks believe Turkey has a place in the European Union. The former Greek Prime Minister Kostas Karamanlis stated that Turkish membership of the EU could only be predicated upon, "full compliance, full accession" in December 2006. In 2005 the European Commission referred to relations between Turkey and Greece as "continuing to develop positively" while also citing a key barrier to progress being Turkey's ongoing claim of casus belli over a dispute about territorial waters boundaries. In September 2017, Greek Prime Minister, Alexis Tsipras, mentioned that halting accession talks with Turkey would be a strategic mistake by the European Union, amid a war of words raging between Germany and Turkey. Also, former Greek Prime Minister, George Papandreou, has urged European Union leaders to keep the doors open to Turkey and to continue dialogue with the Turkish government, in an apparent reference to the former German Chancellor Angela Merkel's calls for the suspension of accession talks with Turkey.

Religion

Further information: Religion in Turkey and Secularism in Turkey
Originally a church, later a mosque, the 6th century Hagia Sophia (532–537) in Constantinople (Istanbul) built by the Byzantine emperor Justinian the Great was the largest cathedral ever constructed in the world for nearly a millennium, until the completion of the Seville Cathedral (1507) in Spain.

Turkey has a secular constitution, civil and judicial system with no official religion, although the country's most prominent imam (currently Ali Erbaş) is a civil servant and head of the Religious Affairs Directorate, or Diyanet. 82% of the Turkish population is Muslim of whom over 70% belong to the Sunni branch of Islam. A minority is affiliated with syncretic Alevi branch. A separate study published in 2019 found 89.5% of Turks identify as Muslim. Turkey would be the first and only Muslim-majority country to join or belong to the European Union. Current EU states typically contain large Muslim minorities. By contrast, Christians are believed to compose only 0.2% of Turkey's population.

Official population census polls in Turkey do not include information regarding a person's religious belief or ethnic background due to the regulations set by the Turkish constitution, which defines all citizens of the Republic of Turkey as Turkish in terms of nationality, regardless of faith or race.

There is a tradition of secularism in Turkey. The state has no official religion nor promotes any, and actively monitors the area between the religions. The constitution recognises the freedom of religion for individuals, whereas religious communities are placed under the protection of the state; but the constitution explicitly states that they cannot become involved in the political process (by forming a religious party, for instance) or establish faith-based schools. No party can claim that it represents a form of religious belief; nevertheless, religious sensibilities are generally represented through conservative parties. Turkey used to prohibit by law the wearing of religious headcover and theo-political symbolic garments for both sexes in government buildings, schools, and universities; the law was upheld by the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights as legitimate in the Leyla Şahin v. Turkey case on 10 November 2005. However, in 2010, the prohibition of wearing headscarves in universities was lifted.

Cultural differences between Muslim-majority Turkey and predominantly Christian Europe play an important part in the entire debate on Turkish accession to the European Union.

Armenian genocide recognition

Main article: Armenian genocide recognition § Turkey

In 2004, the French Foreign Minister Michel Barnier stated that Turkey must recognise the systematic massacres of Armenians in 1915 as a genocide. However, he insisted that although France did not set a precondition for European Union entry regarding the matter, he stated that France would raise the issue during negotiations. The President of the European Parliament, Martin Schulz, stated that it must be a precondition for Turkey to recognise the systematic massacres of Armenians in 1915 as genocide.

The government of Turkey rejects such a precondition for EU membership and does not accept it as a part of the EU membership criteria.

In 2006, the European Parliament voted against a proposal to formally add the issue as a membership criterion for Turkey. A similar proposal by Greek and Greek Cypriot MEPs was also rejected by the European Parliament in 2011.

LGBT rights in Turkey

Main article: LGBT rights in Turkey
LGBT Istanbul Pride parade in 2013, İstiklal Avenue, Istanbul (before the ban in 2015).

Although homosexuality is not a crime in Turkey, in contravention of European Union directives on human rights; Turkey temporarily banned LGBT pride parades in 2015 and 2016. Reasons given for the ban were "security concerns", and "religious sensitivities of the public" caused by holding the parade during the month of Ramadan.

Article 301

Main articles: Censorship in Turkey, Human rights in Turkey, and Article 301

Article 301 states that "a person who publicly insults the Turkish nation, the State of the Republic of Turkey, or the Grand National Assembly of Turkey, shall be punishable by imprisonment of between six months and two years" and also that "expressions of thought intended to criticise shall not constitute a crime."

The EU was especially critical of this law during the September 2005 trial of novelist Orhan Pamuk over comments that recognised the deaths of thirty thousand Kurds and a million Armenians. Enlargement commissioner Olli Rehn and members of the European Parliament called the case "regrettable", "most unfortunate", and "unacceptable". After the case was dropped three months later, Turkey's Foreign Minister Abdullah Gül indicated that Turkey may abandon or modify Article 301, stating that "there may be need for a new law". In September 2006, the European Parliament called for the abolition of laws, such as Article 301, "which threaten European free speech norms". On 30 April 2008, the law was reformed. According to the reform, it is now a crime to explicitly insult the "Turkish nation" rather than "Turkishness"; opening court cases based on Article 301 require the approval of the Justice Minister; and the maximum punishment has been reduced to two years in jail.

Kemal Kerinçsiz, a patriotic lawyer, and other members of Büyük Hukukçular Birliği (Great Jurists Union) headed by Kerinçsiz, have been "behind nearly all of trials." In January 2008, Kerinçsiz was arrested for participating in an ultra-nationalist underground organisation, Ergenekon, allegedly behind the attacks on the Turkish Council of State and Cumhuriyet newspaper, the assassination of several Christian missionaries and Armenian-Turkish journalist Hrant Dink, as well as allegedly plotting the assassination of Nobel laureate Orhan Pamuk. The Ergenekon trials were later attributed to a plot organized by a "foreign-based Gulenist terror organization" and all charges were dropped after the attempted military coup by Gulenists on 15 July 2016.

Women's rights

Further information: Women in Turkey
Eighteen female MPs joined the Turkish Parliament with the 1935 general elections, at a time when women in a significant number of other European countries had voting rights for the local municipal elections, but not for the national parliamentary elections. In 1993 Tansu Çiller became Turkey's first female Prime Minister.
Women in Turkey protesting for their rights. On 20 March 2021, with a presidential decree, Turkey withdrew from the Istanbul Convention, which was ratified by the Turkish parliament in 2011. The decision was criticised by the European Commission and the Council of Europe.

Turkey gave women the right to vote in 1930 for municipal elections. In 1934 this right was expanded for the national elections, while women were also given the right to become elected as MPs in the Turkish Parliament, or for being appointed as Ministers, Prime Minister, Speaker of the Parliament and President of the Republic. In 1993 Tansu Çiller became the first female Prime Minister of Turkey.

In its second report on women's role in social, economic, and political life in Turkey, the European Parliament emphasised that respecting human rights, including women's rights, is an essential condition for Turkey's membership in the EU. According to the report, Turkey's legal framework on women's rights "has in general been satisfactory, but its substantive implementation remains flawed."

Conscientious objectors

Turkey is one of two states (along with Azerbaijan) among the 47 members of the Council of Europe which refuse to recognise the status of conscientious objectors or give them an alternative to military service, other than a reduction of service by paying a tax.

Public reactions

This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (January 2021)

In the EU

Public opinion in EU countries generally opposes Turkish membership, though with varying degrees of intensity. The Eurobarometer September–October 2006 survey shows that 59% of EU-27 citizens were against Turkey joining the EU, while only about 28% were in favour. Nearly all citizens (about 9 in 10) expressed concerns about human rights as the leading cause. In the earlier March–May 2006 Eurobarometer, citizens from the new member states were more in favour of Turkey joining (44% in favour) than the old EU-15 (38% in favour). At the time of the survey, the country whose population most strongly opposed Turkish membership was Austria (con: 81%), while Romania was most in favour of the accession (pro: 66%). On a wider political scope, the highest support came from the Turkish Cypriot Community (pro: 67%) (which is not recognised as a sovereign state and is de facto not EU territory and out of the European institutions). These communities were even more in favour of the accession than the Turkish populace itself (pro: 54%). Opposition in Denmark to Turkish membership was polled at 60% in October 2007, despite the Danish government's support for Turkey's EU bid.

There is a trend in declining support since 2000 that has continued due to the 2013 Gezi protests and the Purges in Turkey (2016–present). In the past support for Turkish accession came especially from left-wing parties, but more recently both sides of the political spectrum in Europe have been highly critical of Turkey's human rights record. Opposition to Turkish accession is higher in countries such as Bulgaria and Germany which have a high population of Turkish diaspora or Muslims in Europe. YouGov polls from 2016 and 2019 have found respondents from France, Germany, Denmark, Finland and Sweden to have the largest net opposition to Turkey's EU bid out of several other choices, including Israel and Russia.

In Turkey

The opening of membership talks with the EU in December 2004 was celebrated by Turkey with much fanfare, but the Turkish populace has become increasingly sceptical as negotiations were delayed based on what it views as lukewarm support for its accession to the EU and perceived double standards in its negotiations particularly with regard to the French and Austrian referendums. A mid-2006 Eurobarometer survey revealed that 43% of Turkish citizens view the EU positively; just 35% trust the EU, 45% support enlargement and just 29% support an EU constitution.

Moreover, Turks were divided on whether to join at all. A 2007 poll put Turkish support for accession to the EU at 41.9% (up from 32% in 2006), with 27.7% opposed and 24.0% indifferent. A 2009 poll showed that support for accession had risen to 48%, even as negative views of the EU had risen from 28% to 32%. A 2013 poll showed Turkish support for the EU bid at one third of the population, and opposition to double that share.

According to the Transatlantic Trends survey for 2013, 60% of Turks have an unfavourable view of the European Union and most Turks believe that working with Asia is more important to their national interests than working with Europe. Around 44% of Turks believe EU membership could be good for the economy in contrast with 61% for EU citizens. During an interview with Euractiv, EU Minister Egemen Bağış stated that: "This is what Europe needs to do; they need to say that when Turkey fulfills all requirements, Turkey will become a member of the EU on date X. Then, we will regain the Turkish public opinion support in one day."

Official viewpoints

Major current viewpoints

  • European Union 2014 EU Presidential candidates Jean-Claude Juncker (EEP) and Martin Schulz (S&D) promised that Turkey would never join the European Union while either one of them were President, reasoning that Turkey had turned its back on European democratic values. Juncker won the election and became the new president of the EU in November 2014. He stated that April:

... under my Presidency of the Commission ... no further enlargement will take place over the next five years. As regards Turkey, the country is clearly far away from EU membership. A government that blocks Twitter is certainly not ready for accession.

  • Turkey Primary reasons for Turkey's persistent requests to join the EU are, among others, the many Turks in Europe and the importance of trade between the two. Turkey is, however, also increasingly disappointed with the widespread opposition to its accession among EU member states. In September 2012, Turkish Prime Minister Erdoğan was asked by CNN if Turkey still wants to join the EU. His response: "There are 5 million Turks in Europe and 3 million Turks in Germany alone. We are a natural member of the European Union. Germany invited Turkish workers 50 years ago, however, 50 years have passed and we have waited at the European Union's doorstep. No other country has experienced such a thing. We will be patient until a point. However, when we cross that point, we will bring light to the situation and decide accordingly." During a trip to Yalta, Erdoğan expressed his stern disappointment regarding the EU accession process: "We are still an EU negotiating candidate. At such a position, I wish EU accession. Otherwise, such a scenario would affect a large region including Ukraine and Turkey."
  • Germany Former German Chancellor Angela Merkel has repeatedly opposed full membership of Turkey to the EU at German-Turkish summits, advocating instead a privileged partnership. Some Christian Democrats back fuller support for Turkey, risking the chancellor becoming more isolated in advocating for a "privileged partnership". In September 2011, on the occasion of the visit of the Turkish president Gül, Merkel said: "We don't want the full membership of Turkey. But we don't want to lose Turkey as an important country", referring to her idea of a strategic partnership. In 2006, Chancellor Merkel said "Turkey could be in deep, deep trouble when it comes to its aspirations to join the European Union" regarding its refusal to open up its ports to European Union member Cyprus. Again in 2014, when Erdogan urged Merkel to strongly support his country's bid, there was no sign the chancellor had relinquished her skepticism. She revealed after the two had talked: "I personally said that we are in a negotiation process that has certain outcome and no fixed time frame. It is no secret and nothing has changed in my view that I am sceptical about full membership for Turkey." In a TV debate in September 2017, then-German chancellor Angela Merkel and her challenger Martin Schulz both said that they would seek an end to Turkey's membership talks with the European Union.
  • France Former French President Nicolas Sarkozy opposed the entrance of Turkey in the European Union, arguing the country was too big, too poor, and too culturally different to join the EU. Former President Francois Hollande, however, reaffirmed support for Turkey in 2012, intending to smooth the way for French companies seeking contracts in Turkey. Franco-Turkish relations remained tense after Turkey imposed a law in 2009 that criminalised recognition of the killing of Armenians by Ottoman Turks in 1915 as a genocide; a move France's Constitutional Court reversed, in turn, causing French firms' share of foreign investment in Turkey to shrink from 6% in 2009 to 3% in 2012. Leaders of French infrastructure companies were especially eager to enter the Turkish markets for nuclear security and rail infrastructure, expected to respectively be worth $40 and $50 billion by 2020.

Timeline

  • Greece In September 1999, following a thaw in Greek-Turkish relations after mutual help in earthquake relief, Greek Foreign Minister George Papandreou told The Guardian "Greece not only wants to see Turkey in the EU, it wants to be pulling the cart of a European Turkey", and that it was within his nation's interests as a way to avoid "continual conflict and tension with the block and European standards".
  • France/European Union In November 2002, then-French President and then-President of the European Convention Valéry Giscard d'Estaing said in an interview with the French newspaper Le Monde, "Turkey is an important country close to Europe, but it is not a European country. It is not a European country because its capital is not in Europe and 95% of its population lives outside Europe." he said. Estaing continued as follows: "The Union should now focus on internal financial problems and the construction of European harmony instead of expansion. Those who most support Turkey joining the Union are actually opponents of the European Union. In fact, the majority of European Council members are against Turkey joining, but the Turks were never told this. Turkey joining the European Union would mean the end of the European Union."
  • European Union The 2005 EU Progress Report stated that: "On 29 July 2005, Turkey signed the Additional Protocol adapting the EC Turkey Association Agreement to the accession of 10 new countries on 1 May 2004. At the same time, Turkey issued a declaration stating that the signature of the Additional Protocol did not amount to recognition of the Republic of Cyprus. On 21 September, the EU adopted a counter-declaration indicating that Turkey's declaration was unilateral, did not form part of the Protocol, and had no legal effect on Turkey's obligations under the Protocol. The EU declaration stressed that recognition of all Member States was a necessary component of the accession process. It also underlined the need for supporting the efforts of the Secretary General of the UN to bring about a comprehensive settlement of the Cyprus problem which would contribute to peace, stability and harmonious relations in the region."
  • European Union In November 2006, the European Commission members decided to suspend parts of the talks with Turkey regarding accession, as Turkish officials said that they will not open Turkish ports to traffic from the Republic of Cyprus until the EU eases its embargo on Turkish-controlled northern Cyprus.
  • European Union In 2007, European Commission President José Manuel Barroso said that Turkey is not ready to join the EU "tomorrow nor the day after tomorrow", but its membership negotiations should continue. He also called on France and other member states to honour the decision to continue accession talks, describing it as a matter of credibility for the Union.
  • Portugal On 28 June 2007, Portuguese State Secretary for European Affairs Manuel Lobo Antunes affirmed that "Turkey should join the EU once it has successfully completed membership talks, which are likely to run for at least a decade." "We think it is important and fundamental that Turkey joins the European Union once it fulfils all the conditions and all the criteria," he said, adding that "Portugal aims in the next six months to 'put the process on track'."
  • Italy On 5 November 2008, the Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini declared that "the Italian government will support the inclusion of Turkey in the European Union with all its strength." He indicated that "the Italian Parliament will give a 'clear word' when necessary with the 'enormous majority' of the Berlusconi government, but also with 'the opposition' which it knows it can count on." "Turkey's inclusion will not be a problem, but it will be part of the solution for strengthening Europe in relations with other countries, such as the Caucasus region" he added.
  • Italy On 13 November 2008, the Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi urged the EU to "accelerate Turkey's membership bid" and pledged to "help Ankara gain accession." Berlusconi pledged to "try and win over those EU members resistant to Turkey's application." "Regarding the opposition shown by certain countries – some of which are important countries – I am confident we will be able to convince them of the strategic importance of Turkey, within the European framework, as a country bordering the Middle East," Berlusconi declared.
  • Sweden/France On 29 May 2009, French President Nicolas Sarkozy cancelled a visit to Sweden scheduled for 2 June 2009, to avoid a clash on the question of Turkey's EU membership just a few days before the European elections and a month before Stockholm took over the EU's rotating presidency. The French President, who is an outspoken opponent of Turkey's entry to the European Union, did not want to highlight the strong divergence of views on this topic with Swedish Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt, the French newspaper Le Monde reported on 28 May 2009. Sweden favours further EU enlargement, including to Turkey. Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt told the French newspaper Le Figaro that "the EU has 'a strategic interest' in Turkey's EU integration and warned against 'closing the door' to Ankara." "If we judge Cyprus to be in Europe, although it is an island along Syria's shores, it is hard not to consider that Turkey is in Europe," Bildt said, referring to Sarkozy's repeated statements that Turkey is not a European country and does not belong to Europe. In the Le Figaro interview, Bildt said: "My vision of Europe is not as defensive as I observe it with other people." The French president's trip to Sweden was cancelled the day after the interview was published. "Nicolas Sarkozy cancelled his visit because of the Carl Bildt interview," one French minister told Le Monde. "The president wanted to avoid a clash on Turkey and did not want that his visit to Sweden interferes with the elections ." In March 2013, King Carl XVI of Sweden said that "The EU will become stronger with Turkey"
  • Spain On 5 April 2009, Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero stated that "Spain firmly supports Turkey's candidature to enter the EU, provided it meets the necessary requisites." Zapatero told Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan that "Spain's position is 'firm, clear and solid' in favour of Turkey's candidature to enter the European Union." "We must 'open the door' for Turkey to enter 'the EU peace and cooperation project', provided it meets the necessary requisites for integration," Zapatero added; before remarking that "Turkey's entrance is good both for Turkey and for the EU."
  • Greece In November 2009, Greek President Karolos Papoulias stated that he would not support Turkey's accession "as long as Ankara behaves as an occupying force in Cyprus."
  • United Kingdom On 4 November 2009, David Miliband, the Foreign Secretary of the United Kingdom, during a visit to Turkey underlined the UK government's support for Turkey's bid to join the European Union, saying: "I am very clear that Turkish accession to the EU is important and will be of huge benefit to both Turkey and the EU."
  • United Kingdom On 27 July 2010, David Cameron, former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, during a visit to Turkey promised to "fight" for Turkey's membership of the European Union, saying he is "angry" at the slow pace of negotiations. He added that "a European Union without Turkey at its heart is not stronger but weaker... not more secure but less... not richer but poorer." On 22 May 2016, Cameron said that "it is not remotely on the cards that Turkey is going to join the EU any time soon. They applied in 1987. At the current rate of progress they will probably get round to joining in about the year 3000 according to the latest forecasts."
  • European Union On 23 December 2010, President of the European Council Herman Van Rompuy he said "Turkish reform efforts have delivered impressive results." He continued "Turkey plays an ever more active role in its neighbourhood. Turkey is also a full-standing member of the G-20, just like five EU countries and the EU itself. In my view, even before an outcome of the negotiations, the European Union should develop a close partnership with the Turkish Republic."
  • Finland In March 2011, then-Finnish President Tarja Halonen pledged her country's full support for Turkey's European Union membership process.
  • Germany On 3 July 2013, at an election rally of the Christian Democrat Party in Düsseldorf, German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble stated that Turkey should not join the European Union as it is not part of Europe.
  • Turkey On 7 June 2013, Turkey's Undersecretary of the Ministry of EU Affairs Haluk Ilıcak said "The process means more than the accession. Once the necessary levels are achieved, Turkey is big enough to continue its development without the accession. Our aim is to achieve a smooth accession process."
  • Czech Republic In 2013, Czech Republic Prime Minister Petr Nečas said: "We continue to believe that Turkey should be given the chance to become a full-fledged member of the European Union after it meets all accession criteria". He described Turkey as an important partner to the EU and praised the constructive role it plays in the Middle East region.
  • Turkey In March 2016, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said that democracy and freedom were "phrases" which had "absolutely no value" in Turkey, after calling for journalists, lawyers and politicians to be prosecuted as terrorists.
  • European Union In July 2016, European Union High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Federica Mogherini announced that EU membership negotiations would be terminated if the death penalty was reinstated in Turkey.
  • Austria In August 2016, then-Austrian Chancellor Christian Kern called for the suspension of full membership negotiations between the EU and Turkey.
  • Turkey In March 2017, in a speech given to supporters in the western Turkish city of Sakarya, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said "my dear brothers, a battle has started between the cross and the half moon" (referring to Christianity and Islam respectively) after insulting European government politicians as "Nazis" in the weeks before. The same month, he threatened that Europeans would "not be able to walk safely on the streets" if they kept up banning Turkish ministers from addressing rallies in Europe. European politicians rejected Erdoğan's comments.
  • European Union In the context of the imminent Turkish constitutional referendum in April 2017, the Vice President of the European Parliament, Alexander Graf Lambsdorff, summarized the state of affairs as this: "In law Turkey is still a candidate, in fact, it is not. Nobody believes in Brussels or in Ankara for that matter that Turkey will eventually join the European Union. And that is why we say it is better to make a new start and put the relationship on a new foundation."
  • Germany In a TV debate in September 2017, then-German chancellor Angela Merkel and her then challenger Martin Schulz both said that they would seek an end to Turkey's membership talks with the European Union.
  • Finland In September 2017, then-Finnish foreign minister Timo Soini, announced that they were in favor of not stopping Turkey's membership negotiations with the European Union.
  • Austria In December 2017, then-Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz announced that they were in favor of stopping Turkey's accession negotiations with the European Union.
  • Austria On 17 July 2018, then-Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz, in an interview with the Greek newspaper Kathimerini, called for ending full membership negotiations between the EU and Turkey and developing relations instead of full membership negotiations. Kurz said: "I have been speaking out for years about developing an honest relationship with Turkey." Kurz continued as follows: "EU membership negotiations with Turkey should be stopped immediately. Turkey has continuously moved away from Europe and its values over the last few years. We should also focus on exploring other forms of cooperation between our neighbors the EU and Turkey."
  • Austria In September 2023, Austrian Chancellor Karl Nehammer, in an interview with the German newspaper Die Welt, called for the termination of full membership negotiations between the EU and Turkey and the development of a new concept within the relations between the EU and Turkey.
  • Turkey In September 2023, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan announced that the European Union was well into a rupture in its relations with Turkey and that they could part ways, if necessary, during Turkey's European Union membership process.

See also

Notes

  1. association
  2. cooperation

References

  1. "EU-Turkey relations". EurActiv.com. 23 September 2004. Archived from the original on 6 July 2008. Retrieved 23 November 2021.
  2. ^ "Turkey joins". Council of Europe. Archived from the original on 23 June 2019. Retrieved 23 June 2019.
  3. ^ "Turkey – Member state". Council of Europe. Archived from the original on 1 June 2013. Retrieved 23 June 2019. Turkey became the 13th member State of the Council of Europe on 13 April 1950.
  4. "Interview with European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso on BBC Sunday AM" (PDF). European Commission. 15 October 2006. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 November 2006. Retrieved 17 December 2006.
  5. Phinnemore, David; İçener, Erhan (14 May 2016). "Never mind Brexit scaremongering – Turkey is a long way from joining the EU". blogs.lse.ac.uk. LSE. Archived from the original on 14 May 2016. Retrieved 14 May 2016.
  6. Kingsley, Patrick; Rankin, Jennifer (8 March 2016). "EU-Turkey refugee deal – Q&A". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 7 April 2020. Retrieved 5 December 2019.
  7. ""Turkey is no longer an EU candidate", MEP says". Euro News. 10 April 2017. Archived from the original on 10 March 2020. Retrieved 28 December 2020.
  8. ^ "Erdogan warns Europeans 'will not walk safely' if attitude persists, as row carries on". Reuters. 22 March 2017. Archived from the original on 7 April 2020. Retrieved 3 September 2017.
  9. ^ "New clashes likely between Turkey, Europe". Al-Monitor. 23 June 2017. Archived from the original on 26 December 2019. Retrieved 8 October 2018.
  10. ^ "Turkey condemns European parliament committee call to suspend..." Reuters. 21 February 2019. Archived from the original on 11 December 2020. Retrieved 21 February 2019.
  11. ^ "Turkey Faces Crucial Vote on EU Accession Before Local Ballot". bloomberg.com. Archived from the original on 21 February 2019. Retrieved 21 February 2019.
  12. ^ Perring, Rebecca (21 February 2019). "'Change it now!' Turkey FURIOUS as EU votes to STOP accession talks". Express.co.uk. Archived from the original on 21 February 2019. Retrieved 21 February 2019.
  13. ^ "EU Council issues strong message about Turkey's obligations". Cyprus Mail. 26 June 2018. Archived from the original on 7 April 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2018.
  14. ^ "EU will Zollunion mit der Türkei nicht ausbauen". Die Zeit (in German). 27 June 2018. Archived from the original on 27 June 2018. Retrieved 8 October 2018.
  15. "European Neighbourhood Policy And Enlargement Negotiations – European Commission: Turkey". European Commission. 2 December 2019. Archived from the original on 10 December 2016. Retrieved 9 February 2020. the General Affairs Council decided in June 2018 that accession negotiations with Turkey are effectively frozen.
  16. "Parliament wants to suspend EU accession negotiations with Turkey" (Press release). European Parliament. 13 March 2019. Archived from the original on 7 April 2020. Retrieved 9 February 2020.
  17. "Chronology Of Turkey-European Union Relations (1959–2019)" (PDF). Republic of Turkey Ministry of Foreign Affairs – Directorate for EU Affairs. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 March 2020. Retrieved 9 February 2020. February 20: European Parliament Foreign Affairs Committee agreed on a draft resolution that calling for the suspension of EU accession negotiations with Turkey.
  18. "Ortak Politikalar Mutabakat Metni" (PDF). Ankara: Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi. 30 January 2023. p. 230. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 March 2023. Retrieved 25 March 2023.
  19. Aydınlık (30 January 2023). "Altılı Masanın "Ortak Politikalar Mutabakat Metni" açıklandı!". Aydınlık (in Turkish). Archived from the original on 31 January 2023. Retrieved 25 March 2023.
  20. ^ "Turkey and EU". Embassy of the Republic of Turkey (Washington, DC). Archived from the original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved 4 July 2007.
  21. "Greece and Turkey accede to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization". NATO Media Library. NATO. 18 February 1952. Archived from the original on 1 November 2006. Retrieved 30 October 2006.
  22. Ahiska, Meltem (1 April 2003). "Occidentalism: The Historical Fantasy of the Modern". South Atlantic Quarterly. 102 (2–3): 351–379. doi:10.1215/00382876-102-2-3-351. S2CID 144132845.
  23. ^ "Turkey". European Commission. 1 October 2020. Archived from the original on 10 December 2016. Retrieved 1 December 2020.
  24. "European Commission – Commission Visa Progress Report: Turkey makes progress towards visa liberalisation". europa.eu (Press release). Archived from the original on 23 September 2017. Retrieved 5 September 2017.
  25. ^ "EU-Turkey relations are at a historic low point, say MEPs". European Parliament. 19 May 2021.
  26. "About Turkey and the EU". Embassy of the Republic of Turkey in London. Archived from the original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved 4 July 2007.
  27. ^ "European Council: EU would open accession negotiations with Turkey" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 June 2019. Retrieved 5 September 2017.
  28. "Germany, France Want Turkey in EU". Deutsche Welle. 26 October 2004. Archived from the original on 15 April 2021. Retrieved 28 December 2020.
  29. "Independent Commission on Turkey". Archived from the original on 9 January 2016. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  30. "Today's Zaman: Turkey Starts Full Membership Negotiations with EU". Archived from the original on 19 September 2012. Retrieved 28 July 2009.
  31. "Turkey, with eye on EU, says determined to reform". EUbusiness. 15 April 2009. Archived from the original on 17 April 2009. Retrieved 27 December 2020.
  32. "Cyprus threatens to block EU deal on Turkey talks". December 2006. Archived from the original on 5 June 2011. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  33. ^ "The ins and outs: The EU's most effective foreign-policy instrument has been enlargement. But how far can it go?". The Economist. 17 March 2007. Archived from the original on 1 July 2011. Retrieved 18 May 2020.
  34. "EU freezes talks on Turkey membership". Independent.co.uk. 12 December 2006. Archived from the original on 11 November 2012. Retrieved 5 September 2017.
  35. Kubosova, Lucia (30 March 2007). "Turkey targets 2013 for EU legal compliance". EUobserver. Archived from the original on 16 February 2018. Retrieved 26 August 2008.
  36. Kubosova, Lucia (17 April 2007). "Brussels declines to endorse 2013 date for Turkey's EU entry". EUobserver. Archived from the original on 23 December 2015. Retrieved 26 August 2008.
  37. "Interview with European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso on BBC Sunday AM" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 November 2006. Retrieved 13 April 2007.
  38. Coskun, Orhan; Hudson, Alexandra (31 October 2012). "Merkel reassures Turkey on EU talks, Erdogan raps Cyprus". Reuters. Archived from the original on 3 November 2012. Retrieved 4 November 2012.
  39. "Gül: 'Biz de AB üyeliğini referanduma götüreceğiz'". Archived from the original on 15 July 2015. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  40. "Cyprus won't open EU accession chapters for Turkey". Archived from the original on 8 October 2018. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  41. "Fule urges Turkey to implement Additional Protocol". Archived from the original on 11 January 2014. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  42. Paul, Amanda (19 October 2012). "Turkey-EU Relations: time to rebuild trust" (PDF). Brussels: Wuropean Policy Centre. Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 October 2018. Retrieved 27 December 2020.
  43. "Turkey tells EU it may postpone competition chapter if needed". TodaysZaman. Archived from the original on 15 July 2015. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  44. "Turkey sees bleak future for EU accession talks in 2012". TodaysZaman. Archived from the original on 15 July 2015. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  45. "Turkey: EU political benchmarks 'were never given to us'". eurActiv. 7 February 2013. Archived from the original on 9 January 2016. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
  46. "EU Commissioner Fule: Positive Agenda to put EU process back on track". Anadolu Agency. Archived from the original on 10 May 2015. Retrieved 5 September 2017.
  47. ^ "Turkey-EU Relations". Republic of Turkey Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Archived from the original on 27 June 2015. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  48. "Bağış: 'Dört fasılda kapanış kriterlerini yerine getirdiğimizin teyidini aldık'". Archived from the original on 11 January 2014. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  49. ^ Dombey, Daniel; James Fontanella-Khan; Quentin Peel (21 June 2013). "Germany blocks Turkey's bid to join EU". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 27 September 2019. Retrieved 21 June 2013.
  50. "New Eurobarometer poll results show a drop in Turkish support for the EU". Hürriyet. Archived from the original on 15 December 2018. Retrieved 23 September 2013.
  51. "Turkey welcomes new chapter in EU talks, wants more progress". Today's Zaman. 5 November 2011. Archived from the original on 9 November 2013. Retrieved 10 November 2013.
  52. "AB'den Türkiye'ye: İdam cezası geri gelirse..." Hürriyet (in Turkish). 26 July 2016. Archived from the original on 21 August 2023. Retrieved 21 August 2023.
  53. "Turkey could put EU talks to a referendum next year: Erdogan". Reuters. 14 November 2016. Archived from the original on 14 November 2016. Retrieved 22 November 2016.
  54. "Euro MPs vote to freeze Turkey EU membership talks". BBC. 24 November 2016. Archived from the original on 24 November 2016. Retrieved 24 November 2016.
  55. "EU says won't expand Turkey membership talks". Yahoo. 13 December 2016. Archived from the original on 30 December 2019. Retrieved 15 December 2016.
  56. Pierini, Marc (12 December 2016). "Turkey's Impending Estrangement From the West". Carnegie Europe. Archived from the original on 6 February 2020. Retrieved 15 December 2016.
  57. "Turkey scolds Austria in EU membership dispute". bbc.com. 4 August 2016. Archived from the original on 19 November 2022. Retrieved 20 November 2022.
  58. "Turkey's EU bid in jeopardy after Council of Europe vote". Euractiv. 25 April 2017. Archived from the original on 25 April 2017. Retrieved 25 April 2017.
  59. "AP: Türkiye ile müzakereler askıya alınsın". DW Türkçe (in Turkish). 6 July 2017. Archived from the original on 6 September 2023. Retrieved 5 September 2023.
  60. "EU plans to cut financial assistance to Turkey". Ahval. 6 May 2018. Archived from the original on 26 December 2019. Retrieved 6 May 2018.
  61. "Austrian Chancellor Kurz urges to stop Turkey's EU accession talks". armenpress.am. 26 March 2018. Archived from the original on 16 June 2018. Retrieved 20 November 2022.
  62. "Enlargement and Stabilisation and Association Process Council conclusions" (PDF). Council of the European Union. 26 June 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 July 2018. Retrieved 8 October 2018.
  63. "European Parliament calls for suspension of Turkey EU accession talks". Euronews. 13 March 2019. Archived from the original on 20 August 2023. Retrieved 5 September 2023.
  64. Huseyin Hayatsever, Ece Toksabay (10 July 2023). "Erdogan links Sweden's NATO membership to Turkey's EU accession". Reuters. Archived from the original on 1 August 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2023.
  65. Hande Atay Alam, Christian Edwards (10 July 2023). "Erdogan links Sweden's NATO bid to Turkey joining the EU". CNN. Archived from the original on 16 July 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2023.
  66. "DN/Ipsos: Väljarna vill inte ha Turkiet i EU" (in Swedish). Dagens Nyheter. 4 September 2023. Archived from the original on 7 September 2023. Retrieved 13 September 2023.
  67. "Turkey expects new talks on its EU bid next month". BBC News. 26 November 2015. Archived from the original on 2 January 2021. Retrieved 27 November 2015.
  68. "New EU chapter promises regional development in Turkey". Archived from the original on 5 November 2013. Retrieved 5 November 2013.
  69. "EU-Turkey membership talks in Brussels". Archived from the original on 11 June 2020. Retrieved 5 November 2013.
  70. "EU, Turkey restart membership talks". 5 November 2013. Archived from the original on 8 November 2016. Retrieved 5 November 2013.
  71. "Accession conference with Turkey: Talks opened on Chapter 33 – Financial and budgetary provisions". Archived from the original on 2 August 2017. Retrieved 30 June 2016.
  72. "2003 Regular Report on Turkey's progress towards accession" (PDF). Brussels: European Commission. 29 May 2003. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 April 2021. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
  73. "2004 Regular Report on Turkey's progress towards accession" (PDF). Brussels: European Commission. 10 June 2004. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 May 2021. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
  74. "Turkey 2005 Progress Report" (PDF). Brussels: European Commission. 9 November 2005. Archived from the original on 25 February 2021. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
  75. "Turkey 2006 Progress Report" (PDF). Brussels: European Commission. 8 November 2006. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 May 2021. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
  76. "Turkey 2007 Progress Report". Publications Office of the EU. Brussels: European Commission. 11 June 2007. Archived from the original on 15 August 2021. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
  77. "Turkey 2008 Progress Report" (PDF). Brussels: European Commission. 5 November 2008. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 May 2021. Retrieved 17 May 2021.
  78. "Turkey 2009 Progress Report" (PDF). Brussels: European Commission. 14 October 2009. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 May 2021. Retrieved 7 June 2021.
  79. "Turkey 2010 Progress Report" (PDF). Brussels: European Commission. 9 November 2010. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 March 2021. Retrieved 7 June 2021.
  80. "Turkey 2011 Progress Report" (PDF). Brussels: European Commission. 12 October 2011. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 April 2021. Retrieved 24 August 2021.
  81. "Turkey 2012 Progress Report" (PDF). Brussels: European Commission. 10 October 2012. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 March 2017. Retrieved 28 August 2021.
  82. "Turkey 2013 Progress Report" (PDF). Brussels: European Commission. 16 October 2013. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 March 2017. Retrieved 28 August 2021.
  83. "Turkey 2014 Progress Report" (PDF). Brussels: European Commission. 8 October 2014. Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 July 2017. Retrieved 28 August 2021.
  84. "Turkey 2015 Report" (PDF). Brussels: European Commission. 10 November 2015. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 November 2016. Retrieved 28 August 2021.
  85. "Turkey 2016 Report" (PDF). Brussels: European Commission. 9 November 2016. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 December 2020. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
  86. "Turkey 2018 Report" (PDF). Brussels: European Commission. 17 April 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 August 2021. Retrieved 28 August 2021.
  87. "Turkey 2019 Report" (PDF). Brussels: European Commission. 29 May 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 November 2020. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
  88. "Turkey 2020 Report" (PDF). Brussels: European Commission. 6 October 2020. Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 November 2020. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
  89. "Turkey 2021 Report" (PDF). Brussels: European Commission. 19 October 2021. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 January 2022. Retrieved 3 February 2022.
  90. "Turkey Report 2022" (PDF). European Commission. Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 January 2023. Retrieved 13 October 2022.
  91. "Turkey Report 2023" (PDF). European Commission. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 February 2024. Retrieved 8 November 2023.
  92. "Commission Staff Working Document: Türkiye 2024 Report" (PDF). European Neighbourhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations (DG NEAR). 30 October 2024. Retrieved 30 October 2024.
  93. "EU plans to cut financial assistance to Turkey". Ahval. 6 May 2018. Archived from the original on 26 December 2019. Retrieved 6 May 2018.
  94. "International". Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands. Archived from the original on 2 January 2021. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  95. "The choice". The Economist. 26 May 2012. ISSN 0013-0613. Archived from the original on 15 April 2021. Retrieved 1 March 2021.
  96. "Van Rompuy: 'Turkey will never be part of Europe'". 18 November 2009. Archived from the original on 2 January 2021. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  97. Ekman, Ivar (11 December 2006). "Top Swedish official backs Turkey for EU". International Herald Tribune. Archived from the original on 27 January 2008. Retrieved 3 July 2007.
  98. "Polish president 'very optimistic' about Turkey's EU accession bid". TodaysZaman. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  99. "Economy – Turkey's EU bid hurt by turmoil – Polish president". Archived from the original on 8 November 2016. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  100. Swinford, Steven (27 September 2016). "Boris Johnson says Britain will now help Turkey join EU despite using prospect to help win referendum". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 24 December 2020. Retrieved 2 April 2018 – via www.telegraph.co.uk.
  101. "Turkey has no place in EU: Sarkozy". Archived from the original on 6 July 2007. Retrieved 13 April 2007.
  102. "Germany's Merkel Opposed to Turkey's Full EU Membership". English pravda.ru. 29 March 2010. Archived from the original on 29 November 2014. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  103. Islam is the religion of 5% to 10% of French citizens. Moore, Molly (29 April 2008). "In France, Prisons Filled With Muslims". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 16 October 2011. Retrieved 23 November 2021.
  104. "French Parliament strikes blow to Turkish EU bid". EurActiv – EU News & policy debates, across languages. Archived from the original on 6 September 2017. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  105. ^ "Turkey and the EU: Issues and Challenges". 50years.intereconomics.eu. 2004. Archived from the original on 2 January 2021. Retrieved 29 November 2019.
  106. Flam, Harry (March 2003). "Turkey and the EU: Politics and Economics of Accession. Seminar Paper 718" (PDF). Institute for International Economic Studies, Stockholm University. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 January 2021. Retrieved 29 November 2019.
  107. İçduygu, Ahmet (2011). The Irregular Migration Corridor between the EU and Turkey: Is it Possible to Block it with a Readmission Agreement? (Report). European University Institute. hdl:1814/17844.
  108. Yukleyen, Ahmet (2009). "Compatibility of "Islam" and "Europe": Turkey's EU Accession". Insight Turkey. 11 (1).
  109. Arin, Kubilay Yado (2013). The AKP's foreign policy: Turkey's reorientation from the West to the East. Berlin: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag. pp. 57–84. ISBN 978-3-86573-719-9.
  110. Bahhouth, Victor; Ziemnowicz, Christopher (March 2018). "Meeting the Global Challenges of Doing Business in the Five Candidate Countries on the Road to Join the European Union". Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 10 (3): 1297–1318. doi:10.1007/s13132-018-0531-3. S2CID 158074120. It would potentially shift the balance of power within the EU having the largest influence after Germany.
  111. ^ "Report for Selected Countries and Subjects". IMF World Economic Outlook Database, April 2021. Archived from the original on 11 April 2021. Retrieved 11 April 2021.
  112. Kaminski, Bartolomiej; Ng, Francis (1 May 2006). "Turkey's evolving trade integration into Pan-European markets" (PDF). World Bank. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 June 2007. Retrieved 27 December 2006.
  113. ^ "The World Factbook". Archived from the original on 10 January 2021. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  114. "2006–2007 Seçilmiş Ülkeler İstatistikleri" (in Turkish). Gümrükler Genel Müdürlüğü. Archived from the original on 8 February 2008. Retrieved 12 March 2008.
  115. "Turkey puts 2008 export target at 125 bln dollars". Xinhua. People's Daily Online. 2 January 2008. Archived from the original on 8 October 2012. Retrieved 2 January 2008.
  116. "Turkey unhappy at EU talks delay". BBC News. 26 June 2007. Archived from the original on 16 July 2007. Retrieved 3 July 2007.
  117. "Turkey becomes EU's fifth-largest trade partner". World Bulletin. Archived from the original on 22 August 2016. Retrieved 19 February 2016.
  118. "Turkey at a glance" (PDF). World Bank. 13 August 2006. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 December 2006. Retrieved 10 December 2006.
  119. "Data and Statistics for Turkey". World Bank. 2005. Archived from the original on 5 November 2015. Retrieved 10 December 2006.
  120. "Turkey – Population and Demographics". Intute. July 2006. Archived from the original on 21 March 2009. Retrieved 10 December 2006.
  121. "Turkey Population (2023) - Worldometer". www.worldometers.info. Archived from the original on 24 March 2019. Retrieved 7 February 2023.
  122. "Global Observer". Beijing Review: 15. 2003. Archived from the original on 22 January 2023. Retrieved 28 March 2021.
  123. Steiner, Jürg; Crepaz, Markus M. L. (2007). European Democracies. Pearson Longman. p. 282. ISBN 978-0-321-07773-8. Archived from the original on 22 January 2023. Retrieved 28 March 2021.
  124. "Eurostat Regional Yearbook – Focus on European cities". European Commission. 2013. p. 200. Archived from the original on 15 April 2021. Retrieved 28 March 2021. The largest Turkish city, İstanbul, had 9.9 million inhabitants, larger than any city within the EU
  125. Cook, Chris; Diccon Bewes (1997). What Happened Where: A Guide to Places and Events in Twentieth-century History. Routledge. p. 65. ISBN 1-85728-533-6.
  126. Mallinson, William (30 June 2005). Cyprus: A Modern History. I. B. Tauris. p. 80. ISBN 978-1-85043-580-8. Archived from the original on 22 January 2023. Retrieved 12 December 2015.
  127. "Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly". Assembly.coe.int. Archived from the original on 7 March 2014. Retrieved 14 February 2014.
  128. ^ "Turkish Cypriots are More Important Than the EU". Archived from the original on 21 November 2009. Retrieved 9 December 2009.
  129. "Greece calls on Turkey to pull out of Cyprus". London: Daily Telegraph. 9 September 2010. Archived from the original on 12 January 2022.
  130. "ABHaber". Archived from the original on 16 April 2013. Retrieved 5 September 2017.
  131. "BBC NEWS – Europe – Analysis: EU views on Turkish bid". 30 September 2005. Archived from the original on 5 June 2020. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  132. Panagopoulis, A. (18 December 2006). "Karamanlis Hails EU's 'Historic' Decision to Admit Bulgaria, Romania". Greek News. Archived from the original on 20 February 2009. Retrieved 13 April 2007.
  133. ^ "Turkey – 2005 Progress Report" (PDF) (Press release). European Commission. 11 August 2005. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 June 2007. Retrieved 6 July 2007.
  134. "Greece warns ending EU talks with Turkey a mistake – World News". Hürriyet Daily News. Archived from the original on 12 November 2020. Retrieved 5 December 2019.
  135. "Former Greek PM urges EU to keep doors open to Turkey – Turkey News". Hürriyet Daily News. Archived from the original on 5 December 2019. Retrieved 5 December 2019.
  136. O'Toole, Pam (29 October 2003). "Headscarf row goes to Turkey's roots". BBC News. Archived from the original on 28 August 2008. Retrieved 26 August 2008.
  137. "Turkey". U.S. Department of State. Archived from the original on 29 November 2020. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  138. "Turkey". International Religious Freedom Report. Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. U.S. State Dept. 15 September 2006. Archived from the original on 20 October 2020. Retrieved 18 May 2013.
  139. Shankland, David (2003). The Alevis in Turkey: The Emergence of a Secular Islamic Tradition. Routledge (UK). ISBN 0-7007-1606-8. Archived from the original on 22 January 2023. Retrieved 6 October 2020.
  140. ÖZKÖK, Ertuğrul (21 May 2019). "Türkiye artık yüzde 99'u müslüman olan ülke değil". www.hurriyet.com.tr (in Turkish). Retrieved 6 October 2024.
  141. "Kosovo – Towards European integration". 6 October 2011. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 31 October 2011.
  142. "Social values, Science and Technology" (PDF). Eurobarometer. June 2005. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 January 2007. Retrieved 19 December 2006.
  143. Ouzel, Nese (10 October 2005). "Alevilik İslamiyet'in içinde değil". Radikal (in Turkish). Archived from the original on 28 June 2015. Retrieved 26 August 2008.
  144. ^ O'Toole, Pam (29 October 2003). "Headscarf row goes to Turkey's roots". BBC News. Archived from the original on 18 November 2006. Retrieved 13 December 2006.
  145. "The Islamic veil across Europe". BBC News. 17 November 2006. Archived from the original on 22 February 2011. Retrieved 13 December 2006.
  146. Registrar (10 November 2005). "Leyla Şahin v. Turkey" (Press release). European Court of Human Rights. Archived from the original on 4 August 2008. Retrieved 28 February 2008.
  147. "Turkey 'must admit Armenia dead'". British Broadcasting Network (BBC). 13 December 2004. Archived from the original on 17 October 2020. Retrieved 26 March 2013.
  148. "Genocide Recognition Precondition to Turkey's EU Bid, Says Euro-Parliament President". Asbarez. 18 September 2012. Archived from the original on 6 May 2013. Retrieved 26 March 2013.
  149. "European Parliament critical of slowdown in Turkey's reform process". Archived from the original on 3 January 2015. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  150. "Spain Says No: Genocide bill rejected - Genocide - ArmeniaNow.com". Archived from the original on 6 April 2016. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  151. "Turkey police fire rubber bullets at banned Gay Pride parade". The Telegraph. Agence France-Presse. 27 June 2016. Archived from the original on 12 January 2022. Retrieved 5 August 2016.
  152. Fantz, Ashley; Tuysuz, Gul; Damon, Arwa (28 June 2015). "Turkish police fire pepper spray at gay pride parade". CNN. Archived from the original on 3 January 2021. Retrieved 5 August 2016.
  153. "MEPs condemn crackdown on Istanbul Pride | The European Parliament Intergroup on LGBTI Rights". lgbt-ep.eu. Archived from the original on 2 April 2019. Retrieved 5 August 2016.
  154. Dymond, Jonny (13 September 2005). "EU blasts Turkish author's trial". BBC News. Archived from the original on 25 June 2020. Retrieved 6 July 2007.
  155. "Turkey insult law 'may be dumped'". BBC News. 28 December 2005. Archived from the original on 4 January 2007. Retrieved 6 July 2007.
  156. "New EU warning on Turkey reforms". BBC News. 27 September 2006. Archived from the original on 17 September 2019. Retrieved 8 July 2007.
  157. ^ "BBC NEWS – Europe – EU hails Turkey free speech move". 30 April 2008. Archived from the original on 2 September 2019. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  158. "In Turkey, ultra-nationalist lawyer wins supporters as enthusiasm for the EU falls". International Herald Tribune. Associated Press. 5 September 2006. Archived from the original on 4 June 2008. Retrieved 26 August 2008.
  159. Akyol, Mustafa (26 January 2008). "The Turkish Leviathan under arrest?". Turkish Daily News. Archived from the original on 5 April 2008. Retrieved 22 April 2008.
  160. Tavernise, Sabrina (28 January 2008). "13 Arrested in Push to Stifle Turkish Ultranationalists Suspected in Political Killings". The New York Times. Retrieved 7 October 2024.
  161. Plot to kill Orhan Pamuk foiled Archived 12 January 2009 at the Wayback Machine. Times of India. 25 January 2008
  162. Lea, Richard (28 January 2008). "'Plot to kill' Nobel laureate". Guardian: Books. London. Archived from the original on 19 December 2020. Retrieved 18 May 2013.
  163. ^ "Turkey's announced withdrawal from the Istanbul Convention endangers women's rights". Council of Europe. 22 March 2021. Archived from the original on 2 May 2022. Retrieved 18 April 2021.
  164. "Turkey: Statement by High Representative/Vice-President Josep Borrell on Turkey's withdrawal of the Istanbul Convention". European Commission. 20 March 2021. Archived from the original on 4 May 2021. Retrieved 18 April 2021.
  165. "Women's rights in Turkey: MEPs say improvements still needed" (Press release). European Parliament. 13 February 2007. Archived from the original on 3 January 2021. Retrieved 13 April 2007.
  166. Popham, Peter (7 June 2006). "Leading Turkish writer faces jail after incurring wrath of military". Independent. London. Archived from the original on 25 August 2009. Retrieved 13 April 2007.
  167. "European Commission: Eurobarometer 66 – Public Opinion in the European Union, Sep–Oct 2006, p.223" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 February 2008. Retrieved 1 September 2007.
  168. "European Commission: Special Eurobarometer 255 – Attitudes towards EU Enlargement" (PDF). July 2006. p. 72. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 August 2006. Retrieved 5 September 2006.
  169. "Disagreement over Turkish EU membership". Copenhagen Post. 22 October 2007. Archived from the original on 10 August 2007. Retrieved 22 October 2007.
  170. ^ Jakob Lindgaard (October 2018). "EU Public Opinion on Turkish EU Membership: Trends and Drivers" (PDF). Feuture at the University of Cologne. pp. 9, 16, 17. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 January 2021. Retrieved 3 December 2020.
  171. Phinnemore, David; İçener, Erhan (2016). "Holding the door half (?) open: the EU and Turkey 10 years on". Journal of Contemporary European Studies. 24 (4): 446–462. doi:10.1080/14782804.2016.1178104. S2CID 156427227. Archived from the original on 4 January 2021. Retrieved 20 December 2020. The last decade has seen this opposition not only increase, but also manifest itself more prominently in party political rhetoric. What might be described as 'Turkoscepticism' has been on the rise, often coinciding with increases in anti-Muslim sentiments across Europe. In member states with larger Muslim populations, the response has been for governments to adopt more sceptical if not hostile positions towards Turkish accession. The clearest examples were Austria, Germany, and France where Eurobarometer polling in 2005 indicated that support for Turkey's accession was as low as 10% in Austria and 21% in the other two countries
  172. Matthew Smith (3 August 2016). "Turkey less popular choice to join the EU than even Russia". YouGov. Archived from the original on 19 May 2022. Retrieved 4 March 2022.
  173. "Eurotrack: which countries do Europeans think should be in the EU?". YouGov. 4 March 2019. Archived from the original on 13 May 2022. Retrieved 4 March 2022.
  174. "The ever-lengthening road". Economist. 7 December 2006. Archived from the original on 6 March 2016. Retrieved 4 July 2007.
  175. "New Eurobarometer poll results show a drop in Turkish support for the EU". Hurriyet. Archived from the original on 15 December 2018. Retrieved 13 April 2007.
  176. "Support for EU Accession Increases in Turkey". Archived from the original on 7 October 2008. Retrieved 18 May 2013.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  177. "Türkler AB'ye rağmen AB'yi istiyor". Radikal. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 18 May 2013.
  178. "Turkey losing appetite for EU bid, says survey". 26 January 2013. Archived from the original on 8 November 2016. Retrieved 18 August 2013.
  179. "Key Findings 5". Transatlantic Trends. Archived from the original on 17 May 2016. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  180. "Key Findings 6". Transatlantic Trends. Archived from the original on 17 May 2016. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  181. "Key Findings 8". Transatlantic Trends. Archived from the original on 17 May 2016. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  182. "Bağış: Fransa'nın tutumunda değişimin başladığını görüyoruz". Archived from the original on 9 January 2016. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  183. Sarmadi, Dario (21 May 2014). "Juncker and Schulz say 'no' to Turkey in last TV duel". Efficacité et Transparence des Acteurs Européens. Archived from the original on 12 November 2020. Retrieved 26 May 2014.
  184. "My Foreign Policy Objectives" (PDF). EU President Juncker. 23 April 2014. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 August 2020. When it comes to enlargement, this has been a historic success. However, Europe now needs to digest the addition of 13 Member States in the past 10 years. Our citizens need a pause from enlargement so we can consolidate what has been achieved among the 28. This is why, under my Presidency of the Commission, ongoing negotiations will of course continue, and notably the Western Balkans will need to keep a European perspective, but no further enlargement will take place over the next five years. As regards Turkey, the country is clearly far away from EU membership. A government that blocks Twitter is certainly not ready for accession.
  185. "Erdoğan: 'AB konusunda bir yere kadar sabredeceğiz'". Archived from the original on 15 July 2015. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  186. "Erdoğan: 'AB'nin güçsüz düşmesi geniş bir coğrafyayı olumsuz etkiler'". Archived from the original on 15 July 2015. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  187. "Kanzlerin in Ankara: Merkel lehnt EU-Beitritt der Türkei weiter ab". FAZ.NET (in German). 29 March 2010. Retrieved 7 October 2024.
  188. ^ "Vor Treffen mit Gül: Merkel lehnt EU-Mitgliedschaft der Türkei ab - WELT". DIE WELT (in German). Retrieved 7 October 2024.
  189. "Merkel backs new EU talks for Turkey but has doubts". Reuters. 23 February 2013. Archived from the original on 24 April 2019. Retrieved 5 July 2021.
  190. "Merkel Worried about Turkey: Situation Is "Very, Very Serious"". Spiegel Online. 6 November 2006. Archived from the original on 3 March 2012. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  191. "Erdogan struggles with Merkel's scepticism on Turkish EU bid". Reuters. 4 February 2014. Retrieved 7 October 2024.
  192. ^ "In shift, Merkel backs end to EU-Turkey membership talks". Reuters. 3 September 2017. Archived from the original on 18 December 2020. Retrieved 19 December 2017.
  193. "Sarkozy: La France et l'Asie mineure – Turquie Européenne". Archived from the original on 28 June 2018. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  194. Pineau, Elizabeth (27 January 2014). "France's Hollande cautiously backs Turkey EU membership bid". Reuters. Archived from the original on 8 October 2019. Retrieved 27 December 2020.
  195. "World: Europe EU warms towards Turkey". BBC News. 13 September 1999. Archived from the original on 4 January 2021. Retrieved 23 February 2015.
  196. "Pour ou contre l'adhésion de la Turquie à l'Union européenne". lemonde.fr (in French). 8 November 2002.
  197. "Final Progress Report for Turkey" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 June 2007. Retrieved 13 April 2007.
  198. "EU urged to freeze Turkey talks". BBC News. 29 November 2006. Archived from the original on 27 August 2019. Retrieved 25 August 2008.
  199. "Barroso says Turkey not ready for EU membership, urges continued negotiations". Zaman, Javno.hr, DPA, Reuters. Southeast European Times. 22 July 2007. Archived from the original on 27 October 2016. Retrieved 24 July 2007.
  200. ^ "EUbusiness: Portugal rejects major EU debate on Turkey this year". Archived from the original on 27 August 2009. Retrieved 5 September 2017.
  201. ^ "ANSAmed: Italy-Turkey: Frattini, We Strongly Support EU Membership". Archived from the original on 27 August 2009. Retrieved 5 September 2017.
  202. ^ "Italy urges EU to speed up Turkey's application". euronews. Archived from the original on 1 September 2018. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  203. ^ "Sarkozy cancels Sweden visit over Turkey". 29 May 2009. Archived from the original on 28 August 2019. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  204. "ABHaber". Archived from the original on 10 April 2013. Retrieved 5 September 2017.
  205. ^ "La Moncloa – Spanish Government: Spain supports Turkey's candidature to the EU". lamoncloa.gob.es. 5 April 2009. Archived from the original on 26 August 2009.
  206. "Greek President: 'We Cannot Support Turkey's Membership to the EU'". Archived from the original on 20 November 2009. Retrieved 21 November 2009.
  207. "David Miliband is visiting Turkey on 4 and 5 November". Archived from the original on 12 November 2009. Retrieved 5 September 2017.
  208. "Cameron 'anger' at slow pace of Turkish EU negotiations". BBC News. 27 July 2010. Archived from the original on 4 January 2021. Retrieved 20 June 2018.
  209. "Cameron: Turkey on course to join EU 'in year 3000'". Business Reporter. 23 May 2016. Archived from the original on 24 May 2016. Retrieved 8 May 2019.
  210. "Van Rompuy urges EU for closer partnership with Turkey". Today's Zaman. 23 December 2010. Archived from the original on 12 December 2011. Retrieved 18 December 2011.
  211. "Halonen lupaa Suomen tukevan Turkin EU-jäsenyyttä". yle.fi (in Finnish). 29 March 2011. Archived from the original on 28 September 2023. Retrieved 22 September 2023.
  212. "German minister's EU remarks on Turkey 'unacceptable'". hurriyet daily news. Archived from the original on 4 September 2017. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  213. "German finance minister says Turkey is not part of Europe". Reuters. 3 July 2013. Archived from the original on 4 September 2017. Retrieved 30 June 2017.
  214. "Turkey's EU process an end in itself, says Turkish diplomat". hurriyet daily news. Archived from the original on 8 November 2016. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  215. "Business between Czech companies and Turkey on the rise". Archived from the original on 24 January 2016. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
  216. "President Erdogan says freedom and democracy have 'no value' in Turkey amid arrests and military crackdown". The Independent. 18 March 2016. Archived from the original on 18 March 2016.
  217. "EU: Turkey can't join if it introduces death penalty". cnn.com. 18 July 2016. Archived from the original on 28 September 2023. Retrieved 25 September 2023.
  218. "Austrian chancellor wants EU to end accession talks with Turkey". euractiv.com. 4 August 2016. Archived from the original on 29 August 2023. Retrieved 29 August 2023.
  219. "Erdogan accuses EU of 'crusade' against Islam". Deutsche Welle. 17 March 2017. Archived from the original on 13 December 2020. Retrieved 3 September 2017.
  220. "Deutsche Politiker geben Zurückhaltung gegenüber Erdogan auf". Die Welt. 28 March 2017. Archived from the original on 3 August 2020. Retrieved 3 September 2017.
  221. "Turkey is no longer an EU candidate, MEP says". Euronews. 10 April 2017. Archived from the original on 10 March 2020. Retrieved 10 April 2017.
  222. "Finlandiya'dan Türkiye'ye AB desteği". ntv.com.tr (in Turkish). 7 September 2017. Archived from the original on 23 August 2023. Retrieved 23 August 2023.
  223. "Austrian PM Kurz calls to end EU-Turkey membership talks". www.dailysabah.com. 26 December 2017. Archived from the original on 28 September 2024. Retrieved 24 August 2023.
  224. "Kurz: EU must stop Turkey accession talks 'immediately'". ekathimerini.com. 17 July 2018. Archived from the original on 12 June 2024. Retrieved 12 June 2024.
  225. "Österreich für Ende der EU-Beitrittsgespräche mit der Türkei". www.welt.de (in German). 11 September 2023. Archived from the original on 25 July 2024. Retrieved 11 September 2023.
  226. "Turkey could part ways with EU if necessary, Erdogan says". Reuters. 16 September 2023. Archived from the original on 18 September 2023. Retrieved 16 September 2023.

External links

Enlargement and partners of the European Union
Previous enlargements
Candidates
Negotiating
Screened
Pre-negotiations
Suspended negotiations
Potential candidates
Partnerships
Eastern Partnership
Northern Dimension
Customs union
Free trade agreements
Other geographically
European countries
Turkey Foreign relations of Turkey
Bilateral relations
Africa
Central
East
North
Southern
West
Americas
Caribbean
Central
Northern
South
Asia
Central
East
South
Southeast
Western
Europe
Central
Eastern
Northern
Southern
Western
Oceania
Australasia
Melanesia
Polynesia
Former states
Multilateral relations
Current
Historical
Diplomacy
Peace Agreements and Treaties
International infrastructure
Missions
Foreign relations of the European Union
Bilateral relations
See also: Economic relationships with third countries
Africa
Americas
Asia
Europe
Oceania
Former
General
  • †= Disputed state, may not be recognised as an independent state by some or all European Union members.
Multilateral relations and initiatives
Organisations
Initiatives
Administration and policies
Foreign and Security Policy
Administration
Funding
Common Security and Defence Policy of the European Union
Leadership
Structure
External Action Service
Agencies
Council preparatory bodies
European Commission bodies
Funding
Policies
Equipment
Decorations
Related
Categories: