| Revision as of 14:12, 8 July 2018 editBD2412 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, IP block exemptions, Administrators2,449,028 editsm →Plot: Fixing links to disambiguation pages, replaced: High Court Judge → High Court Judge using AWB← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:39, 24 August 2024 edit undoThemashup (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,255 editsm →Reception | ||
| (36 intermediate revisions by 27 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{short description|2014 novel by Ian McEwan}} | |||
| {{about|the novel|the Act of Parliament|Children Act 1989}} | {{about|the novel|the film|The Children Act (film)|the Act of Parliament|Children Act 1989}} | ||
| {{Use dmy dates|date=April 2015}} | {{Use dmy dates|date=April 2015}} | ||
| {{Infobox book | {{Infobox book | ||
| Line 13: | Line 14: | ||
| | subject = | | subject = | ||
| | genre = | | genre = | ||
| | publisher = ] (UK)<br/>] (US) | | publisher = ] (UK)<br />] (US) | ||
| | pub_date = 2 Sept 2014 (UK)<br/>9 Sept 2014 (US) | | pub_date = 2 Sept 2014 (UK)<br />9 Sept 2014 (US) | ||
| | media_type = | | media_type = | ||
| | pages = 224 pages | | pages = 224 pages | ||
| Line 22: | Line 23: | ||
| | congress = | | congress = | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| '''''The Children Act''''' is a novel by the English writer ] |
'''''The Children Act''''' is a novel by the English writer ]. It was published on 2 September 2014. The title is a reference to the ], a UK ]. The book has been compared to ]'s '']'', with its similar settings, and opening lines.<ref name=LR> Retrieved 2024-04-09.</ref> | ||
| == Plot == | == Plot == | ||
| Fiona Maye is a respected ] |
Fiona Maye is a respected ] specialising in ] and living in ] Square. While reviewing a case, she is approached by her husband, Jack, who tells her that because of their lack of physical intimacy he would like to embark on a sexual affair, with her permission, with a 28 year old statistician. Fiona is horrified and refuses to agree to Jack's terms. Fiona had developed a horror of the body after presiding over a case in which she ruled that ] should be separated despite the fact that one twin would immediately die due to her verdict. Though her peers lauded her elegant solution to the case, Fiona is privately troubled by it and nevertheless refuses to share this detail with Jack. In the middle of their fight, Fiona receives a call about an emergency case of a young teenager with ] who ]. Jack leaves the apartment. | ||
| Going to work Fiona finds herself pondering her marriage, her childlessness (in part due to her dedication to her career). Impulsively she decides to change the locks to her home despite knowing that this is illegal |
Going to work Fiona finds herself pondering her marriage, her childlessness (in part due to her dedication to her career). Impulsively she decides to change the locks to her home despite knowing that this is illegal. Returning home she realizes that Jack has not returned or tried to contact her. | ||
| The following day Fiona hears arguments for the case involving Adam, the young Jehovah's Witness. As he is only three months shy of his 18th birthday Fiona decides to visit him in the hospital to try to ascertain whether he is capable of denying treatment or not. She finds him a precocious and kind boy and he reads her poetry and plays a tune on his violin with her, with Fiona joining him by singing to his playing in an encore. Returning to court she rules that the hospital be allowed to give him the blood transfusion. Feeling elated with her decision she walks home and, upon returning, discovers that Jack has returned feeling foolish about his attempts to leave her. Fiona realizes that everything will eventually go back to normal and |
The following day Fiona hears arguments for the case involving Adam, the young Jehovah's Witness. As he is only three months shy of his 18th birthday Fiona decides to visit him in the hospital to try to ascertain whether he is capable of denying treatment or not. She finds him a precocious and kind boy and he reads her poetry and plays a tune on his violin with her, with Fiona joining him by singing to his playing in an encore. Returning to court she rules that the hospital be allowed to give him the blood transfusion. Feeling elated with her decision she walks home and, upon returning, discovers that Jack has returned feeling foolish about his attempts to leave her. Fiona realizes that everything will eventually go back to normal and is ultimately disappointed that he returned at a time when she was happy and actually anticipating being alone. | ||
| Months later Fiona's marriage is still tense. She begins to receive letters, at first at her work, and later at her apartment, from Adam Henry, telling her he is now grateful for her ruling and that he sees the hypocrisy in his parents and has become disillusioned with religion. Fiona decides to ignore the letters. Travelling to ] to oversee local cases, she is surprised to find that Adam has followed her there, desperate to talk to her. Adam eventually confesses that he has left home and wants to live with Fiona. She refuses his request and tells him to call his mother. Arranging for a taxi and a train ticket she goes to kiss him on the cheek goodbye, but the two end up kissing on the lips. Panicked after the kiss, Fiona calls her husband to arrange for dinner when she returns and the two begin to reconcile. | Months later Fiona's marriage is still tense. She begins to receive letters, at first at her work, and later at her apartment, from Adam Henry, telling her he is now grateful for her ruling and that he sees the hypocrisy in his parents and has become disillusioned with religion. Fiona decides to ignore the letters. Travelling to ] to oversee local cases, she is surprised to find that Adam has followed her there, desperate to talk to her. Adam eventually confesses that he has left home and wants to live with Fiona. She refuses his request and tells him to call his mother. Arranging for a taxi and a train ticket she goes to kiss him on the cheek goodbye, but the two end up kissing on the lips. Panicked after the kiss, Fiona calls her husband to arrange for dinner when she returns and the two begin to reconcile. | ||
| Returning home Fiona and Jack slowly grow closer. Fiona receives another letter from Adam, a religious poem, which implies that he thinks of her as Satan for tempting him away from religion and has returned to the faith. Like his other letters, Fiona ignores it. | Returning home Fiona and Jack slowly grow closer to one another. Fiona receives another letter from Adam, a religious poem, which implies that he thinks of her as Satan for tempting him away from religion and has returned to the faith. Like his other letters, Fiona ignores it. | ||
| Fiona prepares for a Christmas concert to be performed before her colleagues. The night before the concert she and Jack reconcile with a kiss and promise to dedicate themselves to each other anew. Going to the concert, before she performs, Fiona is informed that Adam has died after his leukemia returned and he refused treatment, now being of the age of majority. Fiona performs at the concert and then runs home. When Jack returns she tells him of the case, the kiss, and his death, feeling guilty for kissing Adam and then turning him away causing him to go back to his religious convictions. She falls asleep crying in her own bed, but when she wakes up Jack has followed her and he promises to love her as she reveals further details about her guilt. | Fiona prepares for a Christmas concert to be performed before her colleagues. The night before the concert she and Jack reconcile with a kiss and promise to dedicate themselves to each other anew. Going to the concert, before she performs, Fiona is informed that Adam has died after his leukemia returned and he refused treatment, now being of the age of majority. Fiona performs at the concert and then runs home. When Jack returns she tells him of the case, the kiss, and his death, feeling guilty for kissing Adam and then turning him away causing him to go back to his religious convictions. She falls asleep crying in her own bed, but when she wakes up Jack has followed her and he promises to love her as she reveals further details about her guilt. | ||
| == Inspiration == | == Inspiration == | ||
| McEwan explains his inspiration in an essay he wrote for '']'' which begins, <blockquote>"Some years ago I found myself at dinner with a handful of judges – a bench is the collective noun. They were talking shop, and I was politely resisting the urge to take notes... How easily, I thought at the time, this bench could be mistaken for a group of novelists discussing each other's work, reserving harsher strictures for those foolish enough to be absent. At one point, our host, ], an appeal court judge, wanting to settle some mild disagreement, got up and reached from a shelf a bound volume of his own judgments. An hour later, when we had left the table for coffee, that book lay open on my lap. It was the prose that struck me first. Clean, precise, delicious. Serious, of course, compassionate at points, but lurking within its intelligence was something like humour, or wit, derived perhaps from its godly distance, which in turn reminded me of a novelist's omniscience."<ref>, ''The Guardian'', Friday 5 September 2014.</ref><ref> Retrieved 2015-03-30.</ref></blockquote> | |||
| McEwan has also personal experience of the courts themselves through his own acrimonious divorce, as he explained in an interview "Well, I’ve been through it myself. I’ve been in it, I’m familiar with the ]. We had years and years of it. It floated from the ] to the ] in the end."<ref> Retrieved 2015-03-30.</ref> | |||
| == Reception == | == Reception == | ||
| On ''The Omnivore'', based on British press reviews, the book received an "omniscore" of 3 out of 5.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Children Act by Ian McEwan|url=http://www.theomnivore.com/the-children-act-by-ian-mcewan/|access-date=17 February 2024 |website=The Omnivore}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-10-04 |title=The Children Act|url=https://www.bibliosurf.com/L-interet-de-l-enfant.html|access-date=2023-10-04 |website=Bibliosurf |language=fr}}</ref> On ] November/December 2014 issue, a magazine that aggregates critic reviews of books, the book received a {{rating|3|5}} (3.0 out of 5) based on critic reviews with a critical summary saying, "The critics were sharply divided over McEwan's latest: ''USA Today'' praised it as a "smart and elegant novel," while the ''Miami Herald'' complained that its "chief selling point is its merciful brevity".<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Children Act|url=https://www.thefreelibrary.com/The+Children+Act.-a0434295042|access-date=14 January 2023 |website=Bookmarks}}</ref> Globally, ] saying on the consensus "No consensus at all -- with those that think it's more about Fiona preferring it to those who think its about the legal/moral case at hand".<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-10-04 |title=The Children Act|url=https://www.complete-review.com/reviews/mcewani/children_act.htm|access-date=2023-10-04 |website=Complete Review}}</ref> | |||
| ⚫ | Reviews are mixed |
||
| ⚫ | *'']'s'' ] believes this to be "the best novel he has written since ''On Chesil Beach''" and goes on to say "He leads us in one direction, then points us in another. And what one especially prizes is this ability to turn on his heel, change everything within a sentence or a well-placed word. From the start of this masterly novel, there is a larger sense, as Fiona lies on her chaise longue, that an elegantly established equilibrium is about to be rocked" and concludes "He keeps us tensely guessing – everything hingeing on Fiona's decision about the boy. And it will not spoil the plot to say that this is a novel which, above all, considers what it might mean to be saved – and not in the |
||
| ⚫ | Reviews for the novel are mixed: | ||
| ⚫ | *'']'s'' ] believes this to be "the best novel he has written since ''On Chesil Beach''" and goes on to say, "He leads us in one direction, then points us in another. And what one especially prizes is this ability to turn on his heel, change everything within a sentence or a well-placed word. From the start of this masterly novel, there is a larger sense, as Fiona lies on her chaise longue, that an elegantly established equilibrium is about to be rocked" and concludes "He keeps us tensely guessing – everything hingeing on Fiona's decision about the boy. And it will not spoil the plot to say that this is a novel which, above all, considers what it might mean to be saved – and not in the sense in which Jehovah's witnesses have claimed the word."<ref>, ''The Guardian'', 7 Sep 2014. Retrieved 2015-03-30.</ref> | ||
| *Tessa Hadley, also writing in ''The Guardian'', enjoys the novel's presentation of "a succession of particular cases from the family division in all their fascinating detail, along with the legal precedents and the issues they raise." but complains that "the digressions make the flow of life in The Children Act feel oddly halting, and, although the plotting is intricate, there's nothing in the writing of Fiona's private life that is as interesting as the legal arguments...The problem is the novel's prose seems not so much to imitate the flow of Fiona's experience, as to offer a fairly pedestrian summary."<ref> ''The Guardian'', 14 Sept 2014.Retrieved 2015-03-15.</ref> | *Tessa Hadley, also writing in ''The Guardian'', enjoys the novel's presentation of "a succession of particular cases from the family division in all their fascinating detail, along with the legal precedents and the issues they raise." but complains that "the digressions make the flow of life in The Children Act feel oddly halting, and, although the plotting is intricate, there's nothing in the writing of Fiona's private life that is as interesting as the legal arguments...The problem is the novel's prose seems not so much to imitate the flow of Fiona's experience, as to offer a fairly pedestrian summary."<ref> ''The Guardian'', 14 Sept 2014.Retrieved 2015-03-15.</ref> | ||
| *James Walton in '']'' criticizes the |
*James Walton in '']'' criticizes the McEwan, concluding that, "By my reckoning, there are at least three highly implausible twists as he strives, with diminishing returns, to push ''The Children Act'' into a novel. None is justified either by his obvious desire to remind us of religion's annoying persistence, or by Fiona's childlessness, often a sign of human incompleteness in his work. The book still contains plenty of good, typically precise writing...Yet, in the end – especially given the choice of Jehovah's Witnesses as the chief target – the feeling persists that McEwan's considerable intellectual and literary firepower is here being used for little more than shooting fish in a barrel."<ref>, ''The Telegraph'', 3 Sep 2014. Retrieved 2015-03-30.</ref> | ||
| *Sam Leith in '']'' writes "The writer's hand is always there: you're aware of McEwan's workmanlike crisscrossing of his themes |
*Sam Leith in '']'' writes "The writer's hand is always there: you're aware of McEwan's workmanlike crisscrossing of his themes – parenting, moral responsibility, the austerity of law and messiness of life, the moving power of art (the boy's poetry; Fiona's piano-playing) and so on. It never descends to being a thesis novel, but you're definitely conscious of McEwan moving the pieces around on the chessboard. Scene by scene, ''The Children Act'' is grounded and plausible. McEwan's prose has all the quiet mastery to which his readers have become accustomed. Fiona herself is completely realised, and the description of the fissure in her marriage entirely convincing and well developed. But Adam – at least to my mind – is less well rounded and the connection between the two sides of the story seems willed rather than organic. The whole assemblage still feels, by Ian McEwan's own highest standards, a little bit thin."<ref name=LR/> | ||
| *Cressida Connoelly in '']'' was even more negative, with the strapline "Improbable, unconvincing and lazy |
*Cressida Connoelly in '']'' was even more negative, with the strapline "Improbable, unconvincing and lazy – Ian McEwan's latest is unforgivable...The characterisation is scant and the writing poor, and he never gives religion a chance"<ref>, ''The Spectator'', 6 Sep 2014. Retrieved 2015-03-30.</ref> | ||
| *Nick Romeo in ] was also negative: "He seems to behold his characters more than inhabit them, and this creates a sterile distance, a sense of reading a summary of |
*Nick Romeo in '']'' was also negative: "He seems to behold his characters more than inhabit them, and this creates a sterile distance, a sense of reading a summary of others' misfortune. Her case just feels like one of many, not fundamentally different than the ones she considers. The story is schematic and contrived rather than palpable and lived."<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thedailybeast.com/ian-mcewans-new-novel-keeps-life-at-arms-length|title = Ian McEwan's New Novel Keeps Life at Arm's Length|newspaper = The Daily Beast|date = 11 September 2014|last1 = Romeo|first1 = Nick}}</ref> | ||
| ==Film adaptation== | ==Film adaptation== | ||
| {{main|The Children Act (film)}} | {{main|The Children Act (film)}} | ||
| A film |
A film adaptation of the novel was released in 2017. It is directed by ] and stars ] and ].<ref>{{cite news|last1=Barraclough|first1=Leo|title=Emma Thompson, Stanley Tucci to Star in Ian McEwan's 'The Children Act'|url=https://variety.com/2016/film/global/emma-thompson-stanley-tucci-ian-mcewan-the-children-act-1201876108/|date=3 October 2016|work=Variety|accessdate=13 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=Daniels|first1=Nia|title=Filming wraps on several features|url=http://www.theknowledgeonline.com/the-knowledge-bulletin/post/2016/12/08/filming-wraps-on-several-films|date=8 December 2016|work=The Knowledge|accessdate=13 January 2017}}</ref> | ||
| == See also == | == See also == | ||
| Line 75: | Line 76: | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ⚫ | ] | ||
| ⚫ | ] | ||
| ] | |||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ⚫ | ] | ||
| ⚫ | ] | ||
Latest revision as of 03:39, 24 August 2024
2014 novel by Ian McEwan This article is about the novel. For the film, see The Children Act (film). For the Act of Parliament, see Children Act 1989.
 First edition (UK) | |
| Author | Ian McEwan |
|---|---|
| Cover artist | Gilles Peress (Magnum Photos) |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | Jonathan Cape (UK) Nan A. Talese (US) |
| Publication date | 2 Sept 2014 (UK) 9 Sept 2014 (US) |
| Publication place | United Kingdom |
| Pages | 224 pages |
| ISBN | 978-0-224-10199-8 |
The Children Act is a novel by the English writer Ian McEwan. It was published on 2 September 2014. The title is a reference to the Children Act 1989, a UK Act of Parliament. The book has been compared to Charles Dickens's Bleak House, with its similar settings, and opening lines.
Plot
Fiona Maye is a respected High Court Judge specialising in Family Law and living in Gray's Inn Square. While reviewing a case, she is approached by her husband, Jack, who tells her that because of their lack of physical intimacy he would like to embark on a sexual affair, with her permission, with a 28 year old statistician. Fiona is horrified and refuses to agree to Jack's terms. Fiona had developed a horror of the body after presiding over a case in which she ruled that conjoined twins should be separated despite the fact that one twin would immediately die due to her verdict. Though her peers lauded her elegant solution to the case, Fiona is privately troubled by it and nevertheless refuses to share this detail with Jack. In the middle of their fight, Fiona receives a call about an emergency case of a young teenager with leukemia who refuses a blood transfusion as a member of Jehovah's Witnesses. Jack leaves the apartment.
Going to work Fiona finds herself pondering her marriage, her childlessness (in part due to her dedication to her career). Impulsively she decides to change the locks to her home despite knowing that this is illegal. Returning home she realizes that Jack has not returned or tried to contact her.
The following day Fiona hears arguments for the case involving Adam, the young Jehovah's Witness. As he is only three months shy of his 18th birthday Fiona decides to visit him in the hospital to try to ascertain whether he is capable of denying treatment or not. She finds him a precocious and kind boy and he reads her poetry and plays a tune on his violin with her, with Fiona joining him by singing to his playing in an encore. Returning to court she rules that the hospital be allowed to give him the blood transfusion. Feeling elated with her decision she walks home and, upon returning, discovers that Jack has returned feeling foolish about his attempts to leave her. Fiona realizes that everything will eventually go back to normal and is ultimately disappointed that he returned at a time when she was happy and actually anticipating being alone.
Months later Fiona's marriage is still tense. She begins to receive letters, at first at her work, and later at her apartment, from Adam Henry, telling her he is now grateful for her ruling and that he sees the hypocrisy in his parents and has become disillusioned with religion. Fiona decides to ignore the letters. Travelling to Newcastle to oversee local cases, she is surprised to find that Adam has followed her there, desperate to talk to her. Adam eventually confesses that he has left home and wants to live with Fiona. She refuses his request and tells him to call his mother. Arranging for a taxi and a train ticket she goes to kiss him on the cheek goodbye, but the two end up kissing on the lips. Panicked after the kiss, Fiona calls her husband to arrange for dinner when she returns and the two begin to reconcile.
Returning home Fiona and Jack slowly grow closer to one another. Fiona receives another letter from Adam, a religious poem, which implies that he thinks of her as Satan for tempting him away from religion and has returned to the faith. Like his other letters, Fiona ignores it.
Fiona prepares for a Christmas concert to be performed before her colleagues. The night before the concert she and Jack reconcile with a kiss and promise to dedicate themselves to each other anew. Going to the concert, before she performs, Fiona is informed that Adam has died after his leukemia returned and he refused treatment, now being of the age of majority. Fiona performs at the concert and then runs home. When Jack returns she tells him of the case, the kiss, and his death, feeling guilty for kissing Adam and then turning him away causing him to go back to his religious convictions. She falls asleep crying in her own bed, but when she wakes up Jack has followed her and he promises to love her as she reveals further details about her guilt.
Inspiration
McEwan explains his inspiration in an essay he wrote for The Guardian which begins,
"Some years ago I found myself at dinner with a handful of judges – a bench is the collective noun. They were talking shop, and I was politely resisting the urge to take notes... How easily, I thought at the time, this bench could be mistaken for a group of novelists discussing each other's work, reserving harsher strictures for those foolish enough to be absent. At one point, our host, Sir Alan Ward, an appeal court judge, wanting to settle some mild disagreement, got up and reached from a shelf a bound volume of his own judgments. An hour later, when we had left the table for coffee, that book lay open on my lap. It was the prose that struck me first. Clean, precise, delicious. Serious, of course, compassionate at points, but lurking within its intelligence was something like humour, or wit, derived perhaps from its godly distance, which in turn reminded me of a novelist's omniscience."
Reception
On The Omnivore, based on British press reviews, the book received an "omniscore" of 3 out of 5. On Bookmarks November/December 2014 issue, a magazine that aggregates critic reviews of books, the book received a 
(3.0 out of 5) based on critic reviews with a critical summary saying, "The critics were sharply divided over McEwan's latest: USA Today praised it as a "smart and elegant novel," while the Miami Herald complained that its "chief selling point is its merciful brevity". Globally, Complete Review saying on the consensus "No consensus at all -- with those that think it's more about Fiona preferring it to those who think its about the legal/moral case at hand".
Reviews for the novel are mixed:
- The Guardian's Kate Kellaway believes this to be "the best novel he has written since On Chesil Beach" and goes on to say, "He leads us in one direction, then points us in another. And what one especially prizes is this ability to turn on his heel, change everything within a sentence or a well-placed word. From the start of this masterly novel, there is a larger sense, as Fiona lies on her chaise longue, that an elegantly established equilibrium is about to be rocked" and concludes "He keeps us tensely guessing – everything hingeing on Fiona's decision about the boy. And it will not spoil the plot to say that this is a novel which, above all, considers what it might mean to be saved – and not in the sense in which Jehovah's witnesses have claimed the word."
- Tessa Hadley, also writing in The Guardian, enjoys the novel's presentation of "a succession of particular cases from the family division in all their fascinating detail, along with the legal precedents and the issues they raise." but complains that "the digressions make the flow of life in The Children Act feel oddly halting, and, although the plotting is intricate, there's nothing in the writing of Fiona's private life that is as interesting as the legal arguments...The problem is the novel's prose seems not so much to imitate the flow of Fiona's experience, as to offer a fairly pedestrian summary."
- James Walton in The Telegraph criticizes the McEwan, concluding that, "By my reckoning, there are at least three highly implausible twists as he strives, with diminishing returns, to push The Children Act into a novel. None is justified either by his obvious desire to remind us of religion's annoying persistence, or by Fiona's childlessness, often a sign of human incompleteness in his work. The book still contains plenty of good, typically precise writing...Yet, in the end – especially given the choice of Jehovah's Witnesses as the chief target – the feeling persists that McEwan's considerable intellectual and literary firepower is here being used for little more than shooting fish in a barrel."
- Sam Leith in Literary Review writes "The writer's hand is always there: you're aware of McEwan's workmanlike crisscrossing of his themes – parenting, moral responsibility, the austerity of law and messiness of life, the moving power of art (the boy's poetry; Fiona's piano-playing) and so on. It never descends to being a thesis novel, but you're definitely conscious of McEwan moving the pieces around on the chessboard. Scene by scene, The Children Act is grounded and plausible. McEwan's prose has all the quiet mastery to which his readers have become accustomed. Fiona herself is completely realised, and the description of the fissure in her marriage entirely convincing and well developed. But Adam – at least to my mind – is less well rounded and the connection between the two sides of the story seems willed rather than organic. The whole assemblage still feels, by Ian McEwan's own highest standards, a little bit thin."
- Cressida Connoelly in The Spectator was even more negative, with the strapline "Improbable, unconvincing and lazy – Ian McEwan's latest is unforgivable...The characterisation is scant and the writing poor, and he never gives religion a chance"
- Nick Romeo in The Daily Beast was also negative: "He seems to behold his characters more than inhabit them, and this creates a sterile distance, a sense of reading a summary of others' misfortune. Her case just feels like one of many, not fundamentally different than the ones she considers. The story is schematic and contrived rather than palpable and lived."
Film adaptation
Main article: The Children Act (film)A film adaptation of the novel was released in 2017. It is directed by Richard Eyre and stars Emma Thompson and Stanley Tucci.
See also
- Children Act 1989 (legislation)
- Informed consent
- Sally Clark (real life victim of a tragic miscarriage of justice mentioned in the Chapter Two)
References
- ^ Literary Review - Sam Leith on The Children Act by Ian McEwan Retrieved 2024-04-09.
- Ian McEwan: the law versus religious belief, The Guardian, Friday 5 September 2014.
- Sarah E Green, solicitor at TLT, reviews Ian McEwan’s latest novel which concerns a High Court judge in the Family Division Retrieved 2015-03-30.
- "The Children Act by Ian McEwan". The Omnivore. Retrieved 17 February 2024.
- "The Children Act". Bibliosurf (in French). 4 October 2023. Retrieved 4 October 2023.
- "The Children Act". Bookmarks. Retrieved 14 January 2023.
- "The Children Act". Complete Review. 4 October 2023. Retrieved 4 October 2023.
- The Children Act by Ian McEwan review – a masterly balance between research and imagination, The Guardian, 7 Sep 2014. Retrieved 2015-03-30.
- The Children Act by Ian McEwan review – the intricate workings of institutionalised power The Guardian, 14 Sept 2014.Retrieved 2015-03-15.
- Ian McEwan’s novels are full of elegant insights. But does his latest take aim at too easy a target?, The Telegraph, 3 Sep 2014. Retrieved 2015-03-30.
- Improbable, unconvincing and lazy - Ian McEwan’s latest is unforgivable, The Spectator, 6 Sep 2014. Retrieved 2015-03-30.
- Romeo, Nick (11 September 2014). "Ian McEwan's New Novel Keeps Life at Arm's Length". The Daily Beast.
- Barraclough, Leo (3 October 2016). "Emma Thompson, Stanley Tucci to Star in Ian McEwan's 'The Children Act'". Variety. Retrieved 13 January 2017.
- Daniels, Nia (8 December 2016). "Filming wraps on several features". The Knowledge. Retrieved 13 January 2017.
External links
- The Children Act on Ian McEwan's official website.
- The Children Act on publisher's official website (UK).
- The Children Act on publisher's official website (USA).
- Ian McEwan on The Children Act - books podcast
| Works by Ian McEwan | |
|---|---|
| Novels |
|
| Story collections |
|
| Children's novels |
|
| Television plays |
|
| Screenplays |
|
