| Revision as of 04:59, 2 November 2006 editThadius856 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,123 edits Proposal | Latest revision as of 14:33, 19 February 2008 edit undoMelonBot (talk | contribs)56,411 editsm moved Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Singapore Changi Airport to Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Singapore Changi Airport/archive1: Standardising Peer review archive formatting | ||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| Also, I'd really like to see something worked out for the first paragraph. It's extremely cluttered and is almost unbearably painful to look at, let alone read. In my opinion, the Airlines subsection should be moved up to its own section and reformatted, but I'd like some feedback on that. | Also, I'd really like to see something worked out for the first paragraph. It's extremely cluttered and is almost unbearably painful to look at, let alone read. In my opinion, the Airlines subsection should be moved up to its own section and reformatted, but I'd like some feedback on that. | ||
| Hopefully we can get it in shape enough to be a good article candidate! | Hopefully we can get it in shape enough to be a good article candidate! ]<sub>]</sub> 04:59, 2 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *Please see ] peer review suggestions ]. Thanks, ] <sub>]</sub> 00:30, 3 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:33, 19 February 2008
Singapore Changi Airport
I'd like to see the article become a bit more streamlined. In its current state, its very unpleasing to the eyes and looks very plain with all of the images and tables on the right side of the page. Perhaps some fiddling with size is also is in order.
Also, I'd really like to see something worked out for the first paragraph. It's extremely cluttered and is almost unbearably painful to look at, let alone read. In my opinion, the Airlines subsection should be moved up to its own section and reformatted, but I'd like some feedback on that.
Hopefully we can get it in shape enough to be a good article candidate! thadius856talk 04:59, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ t 00:30, 3 November 2006 (UTC)