Misplaced Pages

:Assume good faith: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:32, 4 November 2006 view sourceK (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers22,767 edits Reverting back to last by Omegatron. GTBacchus, wikipedia has no official meaning of the words "even if they're jerks".← Previous edit Latest revision as of 06:02, 22 December 2024 view source SMcCandlish (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors201,689 editsm →What good faith is not: ditto 
(1,000 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|English Misplaced Pages behavioral guideline}}
{{policy|]<br/>]}}
{{Redirect-distinguish|WP:AFG|Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Afghanistan}}
{{Policylist}}
{{Redirect-distinguish|WP:FAITH|Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Religion}}
To '''assume good faith''' is a fundamental principle on ]. In allowing anyone to edit, we must assume that most people who work on the project are trying to help it, not hurt it. If this weren't true, a project like Misplaced Pages would be doomed from the beginning.
<noinclude>{{pp-move-indef}}{{Pp-semi-indef|small=yes}}</noinclude>
When you can reasonably assume that a mistake someone made was a well-intentioned attempt to further the goals of the project, correct it without criticizing. When you disagree with someone, remember that they probably believe that they are helping the project. Consider using ]s to explain yourself, and give others the opportunity to do the same. This can avoid misunderstandings and prevent problems from escalating.
{{subcat guideline|behavioral guideline|Assume good faith|WP:GF|WP:AGF|WP:FAITH|WP:GOODFAITH}}
{{nutshell|
* Unless there is {{strong|clear evidence}} to the contrary, assume that fellow editors working on the project are trying to improve it, not harm it.
* If criticism is necessary, seek clarification through discussion rather than assuming wrongdoing.}}
{{Guideline list}}


'''Assuming good faith''' ('''AGF''') means assuming that people are not deliberately {{em|trying}} to hurt Misplaced Pages, even when their actions are harmful. This is a fundamental principle on ]. Most people try to help the project, not hurt it. Otherwise, a project like Misplaced Pages would have been doomed from the beginning.
]. Newcomers unaware of Misplaced Pages's unique culture and the mechanics of Misplaced Pages editing often make mistakes or fail to respect community norms. It is not uncommon for a newcomer to believe that an unfamiliar policy should be changed to match their experience elsewhere. Similarly, many newcomers bring with them experience or expertise for which they expect immediate respect. Behaviors arising from these perspectives are not malicious.


When disagreement occurs, try as best you can to explain and resolve the problem, not cause more conflict, and so give others the opportunity to reply in kind. Consider whether a dispute stems from different perspectives, and look for ways to reach ].
Assuming good faith is about intentions, not actions. Well-meaning people make mistakes, and you should correct them when they do. You should not act like their mistake was deliberate. Correct, but don't scold. There will be people on Misplaced Pages with whom you disagree. Even if they're wrong, that doesn't mean they're trying to wreck the project. There will be some people with whom you find it hard to work. That doesn't mean they're trying to wreck the project either. It is never necessary that we attribute an editor's actions to bad faith, even if bad faith seems obvious, as all our countermeasures (i.e. reverting, blocking) can be performed on the basis of behavior rather than intent.


When doubt is cast on good faith, continue to assume good faith yourself when possible. Be ] and follow ], rather than ] editors or ] with them. If you wish to express doubts about the conduct of fellow ], please substantiate those doubts with specific ] and other relevant evidence, so that people can understand the basis for your concerns. Although bad conduct may seem to be due to bad faith, it is usually best to address the conduct without mentioning motives, which might intensify resentments all around.
'''This policy does not require that editors continue to assume good faith in the presence of evidence to the contrary.''' Actions inconsistent with good faith include vandalism, confirmed malicious ], and lying. Assuming good faith also does not mean that no action by editors should be criticized, but instead that criticism should not be attributed to malice unless there is specific evidence of malice. Accusing the other side in a conflict of not assuming good faith, without showing reasonable supporting evidence, is another form of failing to assume good faith.

This guideline does not require that editors continue to assume good faith in the presence of obvious evidence to the contrary (e.g. ]), nor does assuming good faith prohibit discussion and criticism, as even editors who try to improve Misplaced Pages may not have the ] or ] necessary to succeed in their good-faith goals. Rather, editors should not attribute the actions being criticized to ] unless there is specific evidence of such.

==About good faith==

Everyone makes mistakes, both behavioral (such as ]) and content-based (such as adding ]). Most of the time, we can correct such mistakes with simple reminders. However, there will be disagreements on Misplaced Pages for which no policy or guideline has an easy answer. When disagreements happen, ill intent may not be involved. Keep a ], and consider ] if disagreements seem intractable; many of them are not.

Violation of policies—such as engaging in ], violating ], and so on—may be perpetrated in either good or bad faith. There are processes for dealing with all of these, and ] for repeated violation of policy will apply regardless of whether bad faith was involved or not.

===Good faith and newcomers===
{{main|Misplaced Pages:Please do not bite the newcomers}}
]

It is important to be patient with newcomers, who will be unfamiliar with Misplaced Pages's culture and rules, but may nonetheless turn out to be valuable contributors.

A newcomer's behavior probably seems appropriate to them, and a problem in that regard usually indicates unawareness or misunderstanding of Wikipedian culture. It is not uncommon for a newcomer to believe that an unfamiliar policy should be changed to match their notion of how things should function, especially if they notice that there is already some level of disagreement over the policy in question. Similarly, many newcomers want to have their contributions to articles accepted without question, especially those which pertain to subjects on which they have extensive knowledge. Behaviors arising from these perspectives, while possibly misguided, are usually not malicious and should not be treated as such. Many new users who lack an intuitive grasp of Misplaced Pages customs are gradually brought around, once the logic behind these customs becomes clearer to them.

===Good faith and copyright===
{{main|Misplaced Pages:Copyright violations}}
{{Shortcut|WP:AGFC}}
]
When dealing with possible copyright violations, good faith means assuming that editors {{em|intend}} to comply with site policy and the law. That is different from assuming they have {{em|actually}} complied with either. Editors have a proactive obligation to document image uploads, etc. and material may be deleted if the documentation is incorrect or inadequate. Good-faith corrective action includes informing editors of problems and helping them improve their practices.

===Good faith and administrative action===
When dealing with potential breaches of policy, administrators should not assume editors have breached policy in bad faith absent evidence to that effect.

==What good faith is not==
{{Shortcut|WP:GFISNOT}}
Many people misunderstand Misplaced Pages's "assume good faith" policy as meaning "assume another editor performed ]" or "assume blind faith" regarding a reference, editor, or content. However, the actual intention is closer to "presume good intent", which does not mean "I do not have access to a source, so I 'assume good faith' about the source's content," nor does it mean "an editor has ], so I 'assume good faith' that they've performed due diligence to ensure there are no ] available."

This policy also does not mean you should ignore clear evidence of ] or ] or accept all edits without question. Some bad actors may insist that trust in them should be immutable, per "assume good faith", even when there is evidence against this. However, editors should remember to not disregard patterns of harmful editing, nor should they overlook obvious attempts to deceive, ], or push a ]. Instead, "assume good faith" encourages editors to start with the belief that others are trying to improve Misplaced Pages. When you encounter a problematic edit, it's important to investigate and address it, but do so with the mindset that mistakes can happen and not every error is made with malicious intent. The purpose of assuming good faith is to maintain a collaborative and respectful editing environment.

==Demonstrate good faith==
{{Shortcut|WP:DGF}}
In addition to assuming good faith, encourage others to assume good faith by demonstrating your own good faith. You can do this by articulating your ] motives and by making edits that show your willingness to compromise, interest in improving Misplaced Pages, adherence to policies and guidelines, belief in the veracity of your edits, avoidance of ], and other good-faith behavior. Showing good faith is not required, but it aids smooth and successful interactions with editors.

==Dealing with bad faith==
] was known to steadfastly assume others around him were acting in good faith.]]
{{Shortcut|WP:BF}}

Even if ] is evident, do not act ] yourself in return, ] others, or ] over it. It is ultimately much easier for others to ] and see who is breaching policies if one side is clearly acting appropriately throughout.

Misplaced Pages ] and other experienced editors involved in dispute resolution will usually be glad to help, and are very capable of identifying policy-breaching conduct if their attention is drawn to clear and specific evidence.

Be careful about citing this principle too aggressively. Just as one can incorrectly judge that another is acting in bad faith, so too can one mistakenly conclude that bad faith is being assumed; exhortations to "assume good faith" can themselves ].

===Accusing others of bad faith===
{{Shortcut|WP:AOBF}}
{{See also|Misplaced Pages:Assume the assumption of good faith}}
Avoid accusing other editors of bad faith without clear evidence in the form of ]s. Making such claims often serves no purpose and could be seen as inflammatory and hence aggravate a dispute. Without clear evidence that the action of another editor is actually in bad faith or ], repeatedly alleging bad faith motives could be construed as a ]. The result could be accusations of bad faith on your part, which tends to create a nasty cycle of unhelpful accusations and counter-accusations.


==See also== ==See also==
{{Misplaced Pages glossary}}{{Sister project links|collapsible=true}}
{{Spoken Misplaced Pages|Assume good faith.ogg|2006-07-03}}
===Guidelines===
{{main|Misplaced Pages:Policies and guidelines}}
* ]
* ]
* ]


===Essays=== ===Essays===
{{main|Misplaced Pages:Policies and guidelines#Essays}}

{{col-begin}}
* ] (from ])
<!-- * ] -->
* ] (humor)
* ] (also humor)
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ] (from ])
* ]
* ]
* ]
{{col-end}}


===Articles=== ===Articles===
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]


{{Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines}}
]
{{Assume essays}}
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 06:02, 22 December 2024

English Misplaced Pages behavioral guideline "WP:AFG" redirects here. Not to be confused with Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Afghanistan. "WP:FAITH" redirects here. Not to be confused with Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Religion.
Blue tickThis page documents an English Misplaced Pages behavioral guideline.
Editors should generally follow it, though exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on this guideline's talk page.		Shortcuts
This page in a nutshell:
  • Unless there is clear evidence to the contrary, assume that fellow editors working on the project are trying to improve it, not harm it.
  • If criticism is necessary, seek clarification through discussion rather than assuming wrongdoing.
Misplaced Pages guidelines
Behavioral
Discussions
Content
Editing
Categorization
Style
Deletion
Project content
Other
Search

Assuming good faith (AGF) means assuming that people are not deliberately trying to hurt Misplaced Pages, even when their actions are harmful. This is a fundamental principle on Misplaced Pages. Most people try to help the project, not hurt it. Otherwise, a project like Misplaced Pages would have been doomed from the beginning.

When disagreement occurs, try as best you can to explain and resolve the problem, not cause more conflict, and so give others the opportunity to reply in kind. Consider whether a dispute stems from different perspectives, and look for ways to reach consensus.

When doubt is cast on good faith, continue to assume good faith yourself when possible. Be civil and follow dispute resolution procedures, rather than attacking editors or edit-warring with them. If you wish to express doubts about the conduct of fellow Wikipedians, please substantiate those doubts with specific diffs and other relevant evidence, so that people can understand the basis for your concerns. Although bad conduct may seem to be due to bad faith, it is usually best to address the conduct without mentioning motives, which might intensify resentments all around.

This guideline does not require that editors continue to assume good faith in the presence of obvious evidence to the contrary (e.g. vandalism), nor does assuming good faith prohibit discussion and criticism, as even editors who try to improve Misplaced Pages may not have the information or skills necessary to succeed in their good-faith goals. Rather, editors should not attribute the actions being criticized to malice unless there is specific evidence of such.

About good faith

Everyone makes mistakes, both behavioral (such as personal attacks) and content-based (such as adding original research). Most of the time, we can correct such mistakes with simple reminders. However, there will be disagreements on Misplaced Pages for which no policy or guideline has an easy answer. When disagreements happen, ill intent may not be involved. Keep a cool head, and consider dispute resolution if disagreements seem intractable; many of them are not.

Violation of policies—such as engaging in sockpuppetry, violating consensus, and so on—may be perpetrated in either good or bad faith. There are processes for dealing with all of these, and sanctions for repeated violation of policy will apply regardless of whether bad faith was involved or not.

Good faith and newcomers

Main page: Misplaced Pages:Please do not bite the newcomers
It's a big mess now, but remember: The editor who spilled this probably wasn't trying to make a mess for you to clean up.

It is important to be patient with newcomers, who will be unfamiliar with Misplaced Pages's culture and rules, but may nonetheless turn out to be valuable contributors.

A newcomer's behavior probably seems appropriate to them, and a problem in that regard usually indicates unawareness or misunderstanding of Wikipedian culture. It is not uncommon for a newcomer to believe that an unfamiliar policy should be changed to match their notion of how things should function, especially if they notice that there is already some level of disagreement over the policy in question. Similarly, many newcomers want to have their contributions to articles accepted without question, especially those which pertain to subjects on which they have extensive knowledge. Behaviors arising from these perspectives, while possibly misguided, are usually not malicious and should not be treated as such. Many new users who lack an intuitive grasp of Misplaced Pages customs are gradually brought around, once the logic behind these customs becomes clearer to them.

Good faith and copyright

Main page: Misplaced Pages:Copyright violations Shortcut
The editor who broke this was probably just trying to get information out. It's still a problem, but their goal was to help.

When dealing with possible copyright violations, good faith means assuming that editors intend to comply with site policy and the law. That is different from assuming they have actually complied with either. Editors have a proactive obligation to document image uploads, etc. and material may be deleted if the documentation is incorrect or inadequate. Good-faith corrective action includes informing editors of problems and helping them improve their practices.

Good faith and administrative action

When dealing with potential breaches of policy, administrators should not assume editors have breached policy in bad faith absent evidence to that effect.

What good faith is not

Shortcut

Many people misunderstand Misplaced Pages's "assume good faith" policy as meaning "assume another editor performed due diligence" or "assume blind faith" regarding a reference, editor, or content. However, the actual intention is closer to "presume good intent", which does not mean "I do not have access to a source, so I 'assume good faith' about the source's content," nor does it mean "an editor has removed unreferenced material, so I 'assume good faith' that they've performed due diligence to ensure there are no reliable sources available."

This policy also does not mean you should ignore clear evidence of disruptive behavior or violations of site guidelines or accept all edits without question. Some bad actors may insist that trust in them should be immutable, per "assume good faith", even when there is evidence against this. However, editors should remember to not disregard patterns of harmful editing, nor should they overlook obvious attempts to deceive, vandalize, or push a biased agenda. Instead, "assume good faith" encourages editors to start with the belief that others are trying to improve Misplaced Pages. When you encounter a problematic edit, it's important to investigate and address it, but do so with the mindset that mistakes can happen and not every error is made with malicious intent. The purpose of assuming good faith is to maintain a collaborative and respectful editing environment.

Demonstrate good faith

Shortcut

In addition to assuming good faith, encourage others to assume good faith by demonstrating your own good faith. You can do this by articulating your honest motives and by making edits that show your willingness to compromise, interest in improving Misplaced Pages, adherence to policies and guidelines, belief in the veracity of your edits, avoidance of gaming the system, and other good-faith behavior. Showing good faith is not required, but it aids smooth and successful interactions with editors.

Dealing with bad faith

Socrates was known to steadfastly assume others around him were acting in good faith.
Shortcut

Even if bad faith is evident, do not act uncivilly yourself in return, attack others, or lose your cool over it. It is ultimately much easier for others to resolve a dispute and see who is breaching policies if one side is clearly acting appropriately throughout.

Misplaced Pages administrators and other experienced editors involved in dispute resolution will usually be glad to help, and are very capable of identifying policy-breaching conduct if their attention is drawn to clear and specific evidence.

Be careful about citing this principle too aggressively. Just as one can incorrectly judge that another is acting in bad faith, so too can one mistakenly conclude that bad faith is being assumed; exhortations to "assume good faith" can themselves reflect negative assumptions about others.

Accusing others of bad faith

Shortcut See also: Misplaced Pages:Assume the assumption of good faith

Avoid accusing other editors of bad faith without clear evidence in the form of diffs. Making such claims often serves no purpose and could be seen as inflammatory and hence aggravate a dispute. Without clear evidence that the action of another editor is actually in bad faith or harassment, repeatedly alleging bad faith motives could be construed as a personal attack. The result could be accusations of bad faith on your part, which tends to create a nasty cycle of unhelpful accusations and counter-accusations.

See also

This page is referenced in the Misplaced Pages Glossary.

Guidelines

Main page: Misplaced Pages:Policies and guidelines

Essays

Main page: Misplaced Pages:Policies and guidelines § Essays

Articles

Misplaced Pages key policies and guidelines (?)
Content (?)
P
G
Conduct (?)
P
G
Deletion (?)
P
Enforcement (?)
P
Editing (?)
P
G
Style
Classification
Project content (?)
G
WMF (?)
P
Essays influenced by the assume good faith guideline
Special:PrefixIndex/Wikipedia:Assume
Non-humorous essays
Humorous essays
Categories: