Revision as of 09:05, 7 November 2006 editSugaar (talk | contribs)4,316 edits White people← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:00, 21 October 2009 edit undoXqbot (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,319,930 editsm Robot: Fixing double redirect to Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Society, sports, and culture | ||
(342 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
#REDIRECT ] | |||
{{shortcut|]}} | |||
{{RFCheader|Society, law, and sex}} | |||
<!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> | |||
*] - After a brief consensual stabilization (just reverted to it), the article is again under attack by people with a racist/White nationalist agenda that want to make it their political billboard, editing at will without accepting discussion or consensus. Many issues that should be in the corresponding parent article (]) or subarticles (], for instance) are continuously added to this one against majority opinion. See ] and article history for details. 09:05, 7 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
* ] - Repeated reverts of the article due to POV edits and links to unreliable websites as citations for the POV edits. -- 00:05, 2 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
*] - Votes and commentary requested for whether the article ] should be renamed (i.e. to "joint" or "cigarette (cannabis)"). 09:14, 1 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
*] How is ] defined? — 22:55, 31 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
*]: This is a controversy about whether a group of gay nuns called the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence belongs on this page. --] 01:07, 30 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
*]. Are specific claims made in the article "exceptional" per ]? Is it acceptable to link to Southern Poverty Law Center as the only source in each instance? 19:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
*]: proposing to add, in the "See Also" section, a link to ]. This supersedes the request below. 18:31, 25 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
*]: Should ''all'' sourced information be included, even when it comes from extremist self-published partisan sources, or should the article be written with reference to non-partisan academic sources and scientific studies? 11:19, 21 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
*]: Repeated deletions of any material alluding to exclusion of non-theists from Boy Scouts. 23:52, 20 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
*] - whether the University is the oldest university in the Philippines. 09:14, 17 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
*] - Whether a drawn, black-and-white image depicting three people engaging in a sex act is an appropriate image for the article. 13:38, 14 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
*] - What Misplaced Pages guidelines or customs govern the "notability" threshold for items within an article? Is a "war" between two dormitories, which was covered in a long article in a campus newspaper, suitable for inclusion in an article whose topic is one of those dormitories? 23:40, 9 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
*] Does this article use irrelevant facts and unverified claims to subtly discredit this organization? Do the citations in this article support the claims they are intended to support? 23:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
*] does recently added subsection adhere to ] and ]? 19:32, 5 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
<!--Add new items at the TOP, NOT HERE. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign--> |
Latest revision as of 15:00, 21 October 2009
Redirect to: