Misplaced Pages

User talk:Tawker: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:43, 7 November 2006 editTizio (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,761 edits Rollback: posted on VP(P)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 18:51, 19 November 2024 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,373,247 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Tawker/Archive 2. (BOT) 
(913 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
{| class="messagebox" style="background: AntiqueWhite;"
| age =2160
| archiveprefix =User talk:Tawker/Archive
| numberstart =1
| maxarchsize =75000
| header ={{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minkeepthreads =5
| format = %%i
| archivebox =yes
| box-advert=yes
}}
<!-- Template:Setup cluebot archiving -->


Older Archives (by month) @ ]
|This talk page is '''automatically archived''' by Werdnabot. Any sections older than '''5''' days are automatically archived to ''']'''. Sections without timestamps are not archived
|-
|}<!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-5 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-User talk:Tawker/(!month)06--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE-->
Archives (by month) @ ]


== Vandalism?? == == BAG membership ==
Hello. You are listed as a ] but it appears you may not be actively helping in this area anymore. Do you intend to return to BAG-related activity on Misplaced Pages, or are you happy to be removed from this list? &mdash;&nbsp;Martin <small>(]&nbsp;·&nbsp;])</small> 12:57, 14 December 2023 (UTC)


== Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder ==
What vandalism? How dare you accuse me of vandalism! Show me the vandalism! ] 10:31, 3 November 2006 (UTC)


]This is a reminder that established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.{{pb}}Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the ].{{pb}}Thank you for your past contributions to the project. —&thinsp;] 00:35, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
== help! ==
::Thanks - yes I have had significant time constraints - I will look to re-engage where I can. -- ] (]) 22:18, 2 October 2024 (UTC)


== Invitation to participate in a research ==
I accidentally blanked half the Robin Hood article. I know you fixed it when I did this to the Star Wars article. Can you tell me how to fix it? Thank you.


Hello,
TS Edit Test


The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''.
== re: Unicornscan article deletion ==


You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
I noticed that you have deleted the Unicornscan.
Could you please point me to some justification of this?


The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] .
== Continuing the discussion... ==


Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
On your talk page this time. You stated: "your current vote likely will confuse the hell out of a lot of users..." How many users who voted '''support''' actually understand the C# code TawkerBotTorA is written in ? ]


Kind Regards,
== Retrieval ==


]
Would it be possible to retrieve the article somehow? I couldn't figure that out from the deletion history.
Thanks


<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
== no offence ==
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 -->


== Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research ==
Are you a wiki freak???!?!? Your making me scared!


Hello,
NO OFENCE!


I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ].
== ==


Take the survey ''''''.
Hello! The vandalbot tagged me as a vandal by mistake; I think that it may be because I forgot to sign a comment on ] but other than that I am pretty sure that I am not a vandal! ] 20:45, 29 October 2006 (UTC)


Kind Regards,
== Benton Academy ==


]
Sorry - I'll fix according to your comments.


<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
Why was this deleted???
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 -->


== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
I did not have time to add the hangon tag to this page after it was marked. I had made links from the ] page (the reference was there, I just added link capability. I was also referenced under [[List of high schools in Mississippi
]]. Again I just added the link ability. I seem to remember two links being a qualifying parameter. I also have about 200 words of text to be added. There are several additional schools in the same catagory listed on Misplaced Pages indluding ], ], ] and several others.


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
== Check other modifications by same user with bot ==
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Is there any way you could do this? Often, a user who had a change reverted by the bot also performed many other vandalizations. If the bot could check through the user's edits, it would help clear out vandalism even faster.


If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
== ] request ==


</div>
Hi - I've left a message ] regarding a very short trial I ran for the pluralisation system. Thanks, <strong>]]]</strong> 20:45, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
</div>

<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 -->
==Responding==
Hi Tawker. Here are the templates I use for the warnings:

{{-}}
<code><nowiki>==Editing Concerns==</nowiki></code>{{-}}
<code><nowiki>#{{subst:test1}} ~~~~ </nowiki></code>{{-}}
<code><nowiki>#{{subst:test2}} ~~~~ </nowiki></code>{{-}}
<code><nowiki>#{{subst:test3}} ~~~~ </nowiki></code>{{-}}
<code><nowiki>#{{subst:test4}} ~~~~ </nowiki></code>{{-}}
{{-}}

Each has text and symbols, based on common use for many RC patrollers. Thanks for considering my suggestion. ] 02:39, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

The thing is we don't want to give the standard warnings - they sound way too much like a human is doing it - I'm well aware of test1-4, and of course the much more useful test5 :) - I think I'll work on another custom warning -- ] 04:29, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

== Thank you... ==

...for your support of my recent RfA. I have always been a fan of your work as a Wikiepedian, so I especially honored by your vote of confidence. If I can be of any use to you, just drop me a line. BTW, congrats on getting to live in the Couv, one of the most beautiful cities on earth. We should all be so lucky. Cheers. ] <small>(])</small> 19:28, 3 November 2006 (UTC)


==Re: LOL==

Well, I did unblock myself, which I guess is ok in this situation. It is pretty funny, and I'm glad that I'm not the only one who does that either. Strange things can happen while trying to keep up with all the vandalism. Am I the only one who feels like there is more vandalism than usual today? And I am reverting only the edits of the users that AntiVandalBot catches. ] 22:43, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

==How to get a regular vandal blocked==
I am writing about user 82.94.28.98 who has had repeated warnings about vandalism. Recently (s)he has been very busy vandalizing the article on "coolies". I don't know how to contact an administrator to deal with this person. Would you please help me with this problem? Many thanks, ] 22:45, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

==Monitor pages==
Hey Tawker, remember how on your RfA you responded to my comments almost instantly, then told me you have a bot monitoring that page? Do you still happen to have a copy of that bot? Cheers. +] <sup>(])</sup> 04:19, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

== small favor ==

I was wondering of you could help me out with getting votes for expanding an article I started a while back. My old ] article is currently being considered for expansion by the Misplaced Pages:Australian Collaboration of the Fortnight. To vote, go ] and scroll to the bottom.


Thanks! ] 05:09, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

== Vandal Bot Code ==

Hi Tawker, I help administer a wiki and am interested in this AntiVandalBot. Is it possible to make a Vandal Bot that doesnt rely us on installing it on Unix? For example, it would be nice it works as a MediaWiki extension. Any pointers on that? Thank. --] 01:11, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

== Rollback ==

I had this idea recently: what if the ] was assigned to the antivandalism bots? Would that help TawkerBot2 & Co.? I believe it's not impossible to get the community consensus for this, since the objections raised in ] do not apply to bots. Of course, there is no point in proposing it if there is no gain for the bots. ], ], ] 18:42, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
:Yep, that would reduce our load on the servers a bit. It's a good thing (tm) ;) -- ] 18:52, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
::Laid out a section I intend to propose to the village pump at ]. Feel free to add/remove/correct if you like. ], ], ] 19:20, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
::Posted at ]. Let's see what happens. ], ], ] 17:43, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

== Re: ] ==

With all due respect I think I'll have to dispute your speedy of this one. Removing warnings is considered vandalism per VAND and it is a well known and accepted practice to block / protect user talk pages of users who constantly remove it. I must ask that you restore it..... -- ] 05:13, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

:] has undeleted them. As I said to him, I'm not going to delete them again, I'll just let my reasoning stand for itself and someone else can act if they like. I will have to disagree with you about these templates. I'm sure that blocking and protection can be used in many cases where a user is removing warnings, for example if a vandal is blanking warnings to confuse future RC patrollers (I'd block them myself in that case). But the problem with the templates is that they imply a universal approach, and policy status, when that is simply not the case. I've expressed these reasons ] and ]. How would you respond to those arguments? --]&nbsp;(]) 06:11, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

:Also, please note that you are incorrect about the contents of ]. While the concept that user talk pages should be used as a 'rap sheet' / 'wall of shame' for past warnings ''has'' been inserted into that policy multiple times it has been removed just as many because there was never a consensus in support of such a change. What you describe as a "well known and accepted practice" is, in fact, strongly opposed as blockable harassment by a large number of admins... as can be seen in the current AN discussions noted above. --] 12:03, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

== Thanks! ==

For removing the vandalism on my talk page, and quick work in dealing with the vandal. I was posting a report on AIV when you bagged it. Cheers! ] <small>]</small> 07:02, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

== AntiVandalBot ==

Hello Tawker. I was reading the 'Bot's user page when I came across this:<br>

''"...It is a set of check statements that if enough match true, it reverts. The patterns will be emailed upon request to users who can be trusted..."''<br>

I was wondering if I could get the pattern e-mailed to me. I can assure you that I am ''not'' a vandal. In fact, I spend most of my wiki-time reverting vandalism, and my Userpage was even targeted several times. I'm really curious about bots and yours seems to be the most active on the pages that I watch. My e-mail can be reached by clicking the "E-mail this user" link from my Userpage. Thank you for your time and take it easy. -]] <sup>]</sup> 16:46, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:51, 19 November 2024


Archives (Index)



This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Older Archives (by month) @ User talk:Tawker/Archives

BAG membership

Hello. You are listed as a member of the Bot Approvals Group but it appears you may not be actively helping in this area anymore. Do you intend to return to BAG-related activity on Misplaced Pages, or are you happy to be removed from this list? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:57, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder

Information iconThis is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:35, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks - yes I have had significant time constraints - I will look to re-engage where I can. -- Tawker (talk) 22:18, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)