| Revision as of 18:13, 15 October 2018 editNaomiAmethyst (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers, Template editors6,269 edits →Reporting false positives on others' accounts: Reply.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:50, 30 December 2024 edit undoCiaPan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers12,153 edits Reverted good faith edits by 2605:59C8:409B:4E10:A5C5:6CFD:BC29:C2E2 (talk): Test editTags: Twinkle Undo | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{skip to TOC}} | |||
| {{divbox|1=red|2=This user is NOT a human|3=This is the combined talk page for ] and ]. These users are ''']''' and are '''not humans'''. Please be aware that bots cannot think like a human and cannot operate outside of their programming. '''Messages you leave on this talk page will not be answered by a bot''' – either a bot operator or another human will answer you.}} | {{divbox|1=red|2=This user is NOT a human|3=This is the combined talk page for ] and ]. These users are ''']''' and are '''not humans'''. Please be aware that bots cannot think like a human and cannot operate outside of their programming. '''Messages you leave on this talk page will not be answered by a bot''' – either a bot operator or another human will answer you.}} | ||
| {{divbox|1=red|2=] False positives and false negatives|3=If you believe that ClueBot NG has mistakenly identified a good edit as vandalism, please follow the directions in the warning it gave or ]. Please do not report it on this talk page. It takes less time to report the case to the correct location, and we can handle it more effectively there.<br />If you believe that ClueBot NG has missed an edit that ''is'' vandalism, again do not report it here. ClueBot is unable to catch ''all'' vandalism. Just revert the edit and warn the editor.}} | {{divbox|1=red|2=] False positives and false negatives|3=If you believe that ClueBot NG has mistakenly identified a good edit as vandalism, please follow the directions in the warning it gave or ]. Please do not report it on this talk page. It takes less time to report the case to the correct location, and we can handle it more effectively there.<br />If you believe that ClueBot NG has missed an edit that ''is'' vandalism, again do not report it here. ClueBot is unable to catch ''all'' vandalism. Just revert the edit and warn the editor.}} | ||
| ⚫ | {{divbox|1=blue|2=ClueBot NG Links!|3=]{{•}} ]}} | ||
| <!-- {{divbox|1=red|2=ClueBot III is currently not archiving talk pages; this issue is being investigated.}} --> | |||
| ⚫ | {{divbox|1=blue|2=ClueBot NG Links!|3=] |
||
| {{divbox|1=blue|2=Purpose of this Page|3=This page is for '''comments on''' or '''questions about''' the ClueBots.}} | {{divbox|1=blue|2=Purpose of this Page|3=This page is for '''comments on''' or '''questions about''' the ClueBots.}} | ||
| '''The current status of ClueBot NG is: {{User:ClueBot NG/running}}'''<br /> | '''The current status of ClueBot NG is: {{User:ClueBot NG/running}}'''<br /> | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | ||
| |archiveprefix=User talk:ClueBot Commons/ |
|archiveprefix=User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/Facepalms | ||
| |format= | |format= | ||
| |age=99999 | |age=99999 | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| |archivenow=<nowiki>{{facepalm,{{Facepalm</nowiki> | |archivenow=<nowiki>{{facepalm,{{Facepalm</nowiki> | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{ |
{{Archives|collapsed=yes|image=none|search=no|style=background-color:transparent; border-color:#CCCCCC| | ||
| {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | ||
| |archiveprefix=User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/ | |archiveprefix=User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/ | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| |archivebox=yes | |archivebox=yes | ||
| |box-advert=yes | |box-advert=yes | ||
| |minkeepthreads=2 | |||
| |archivenow=<nowiki>{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}},{{/censor}},{{atop}}</nowiki> | |archivenow=<nowiki>{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}},{{/censor}},{{atop}}</nowiki> | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| Line 41: | Line 42: | ||
| <div style="clear: both;" ></div> | <div style="clear: both;" ></div> | ||
| == Question regarding ClueBot == | |||
| == Reporting false positives on others' accounts == | |||
| Can I please see the source? (A github url for ClueBot) ? | |||
| Are users allowed to report false positives (FP/FPs) if they are not the target of the reversion? I have been trying to report two FPs on someone else's account and I am not sure that I have succeeded. I get to the bit where I'm invited to put in the ClueBot number, I do so, it shows me the relevant edit but then there is no Submit or Continue button, so I am not sure that it has worked. If I look at the list of reported FPs I don't find my two concerns in it. I'm sorry if I am being stupid or have missed an FAQ but I can't see what I should do next. All advice gratefully received. Thanks and best wishes ] (]) 08:47, 15 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
| Is it being run on someone's PC or is it being run in the cloud? | |||
| :Anyone can report false positives. When you enter the revert ID, you'll be taken to a page that shows the change that ClueBot NG reverted, along with some information about the edit. If you scroll down to the bottom, you should see a button that says "Report false positive". Click that button. If you see comments, instead, it has already been reported. If instead you see "Reverted: No," then that means that ClueBot NG does not believe that it actually reverted the edit, so there is nothing to report. -- ]<sup>(]|]|])</sup> 09:10, 15 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
| I have more questions than I have answers coming to this page. | |||
| ::Thank you very much for the prompt and very helpful reply. What is happening is exactly as you describe, taking the branch where after I've submitted the number, when it shows me the edit it says "Reverted: No" so I have no report button. In both the cases that I am looking, though, ClueBot ''did'' revert the edit{{snd}}unless I am having some failure of understanding here <small>(which would not be the first time!)</small> so I am a bit stuck. I have manually reverted ClueBot in both cases but I promise you that it was saying "No" when its edit was the most current too. I can give you the ClueBot refs if it helps you to explain it to me but I was trying to keep it a general question on principles of use, not to look like I am trying to circumvent your request to editors to {{tq|Report ClueBot NG false positives on the false positives page, not here}}. I do have a horrible feeling that I am being stupid and missing the point by a mile (1.6 km) and as I say it wouldn't exactly be the first time I've been very ''very'' stupid here{{snd}}but if you could help ease my incomprehension-pain then would be a ] (secondary meaning), thanks! Best wishes ] (]) 09:35, 15 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :::What ID are you trying to report? -- ]<sup>(]|]|])</sup> 10:20, 15 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks ] (]) 12:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Thank you for the response. 3508994 and 3509001. If I've got this all wrong please just let me have it with both barrels. Cheers ] (]) 14:37, 15 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :@] the bot runs on Wikimedia Toolforge and its source code is . <span style="white-space:nowrap"><span style="font-family:monospace">'''<nowiki>''']<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki>'''</span> (] • ])</span> 13:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: Seems related to a bug reported a couple of weeks ago here: ]. I'll see about prioritizing this fix. I thought this was a one-time occurrence, but apparently not. -- ]<sup>(]|]|])</sup> 18:13, 15 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:50, 30 December 2024
| Skip to table of contents |
False positives and false negativesIf you believe that ClueBot NG has mistakenly identified a good edit as vandalism, please follow the directions in the warning it gave or click here. Please do not report it on this talk page. It takes less time to report the case to the correct location, and we can handle it more effectively there.If you believe that ClueBot NG has missed an edit that is vandalism, again do not report it here. ClueBot is unable to catch all vandalism. Just revert the edit and warn the editor. ClueBot NG Links!Report False Positives • Frequently Asked Questions Purpose of this PageThis page is for comments on or questions about the ClueBots.
The current status of ClueBot NG is: Running
The current status of ClueBot III is: Running
Praise should go on the praise page. Barnstars and other awards should go on the awards page.
Use the "new section" button at the top of this page to add a new section. Use the link above each section to edit that section.
This page is automatically archived by ClueBot III.
The ClueBots' owner or someone else who knows the answer to your question will reply on this page.
| ClueBots | |
|---|---|
| ClueBot NG/Anti-vandalism · ClueBot II/ClueBot Script |  |
| ClueBot III/Archive · Talk page for all ClueBots |
 | Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back. |
Question regarding ClueBot
Can I please see the source? (A github url for ClueBot) ? Is it being run on someone's PC or is it being run in the cloud? I have more questions than I have answers coming to this page.
Thanks Vidyagamerfromaus (talk) 12:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Vidyagamerfromaus the bot runs on Wikimedia Toolforge and its source code is here. ''']''' (talk • contribs) 13:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC)